The blog of author Dennis Cooper

Jesse Bransford presents … A List of Grimoires for the Twilight of the Age of the Book *

* (restored)

Since the 60s there has been a ton of scholarly research on magic and the history of magic. Pioneered by people like Francis Yates, there have also been in and out of the margins public ‘practitioners’ that despite all efforts continue to profess the reality of certain techniques of ‘action at a distance.’ Some of the names below may be familiar; some less so. The survival of this material in the public consciousness is strange. Part of it has to do with the way books work. And that’s all of course changing radically right now.

The grimoire, or magical textbook, has a long and spurious history that sits in several places, often contradictory in nature: the most immediately relevant is it’s relationship to reality and fantasy. Magic books have lived most of their lives in the imagination – most grimoires were limited in distribution and secreted for various reasons in hand-written manuscript form. Their movements and reality were shrouded in rumor and secrecy. This secrecy became part of the grimoire’s reputation and it’s hidden and rare status contributed to it’s notoriety. This often dramatic reputation was immediately seized on in the advent of mass publication, and the occult book of arcane knowledge became a singular protagonist in most genre fiction and popular cultural forms. For fun I’ve sprinkled this survey with my favorite examples in recent film and television. The smattering of clips is a fraction of the material and could make a post all it’s own.


Giles the Watcher on Books vs. the Internet from Buffy the Vampire Slayer

As the internet absorbs printed text, a universe of books is being redistributed, pulped and fetishized. Nowhere is this more clear than in the bibliophile/scholar/geek culture for occult books. Certain choice used book stores are flooded with vintage books from the 60s and 70s new age, and small-run presses are fueling a renaissance of translation, scholarship and publication of magic texts that have languished for centuries in libraries all over the world. As someone who has been watching and participating in this culture for a while it seems to be a great moment to share a small list of available works and to meditate on the present moment’s import for the book and the book of magic.


Evil Dead II

The specific quality of this list helps underline the triple reality these books present at the moment. First, no matter how you break it down, these books are arcane. It is one thing to read about occult books as narrative devices in thrillers and weird fiction (which is awesome). It is entirely different to read the books themselves and chance the bleed of fantasy into reality. A close reading of any grimoire is Lovecraft x10. Sanity points will leech away from you and chapel perilous, once looming safely in the distance, will be just over the next hill. That’s the cautionary tale in every book/film/story about infernal books… Secondly, although arcane, all of these books are in print, available right now on Amazon. In fairness, to keep to that qualification necessitated some omissions I’m sad about, and in one or two instances I chose versions of the texts that are in fact out of print (this is after all a collector’s fetish realm). But thirdly, all of these texts are available online in one form or another. You won’t get the commentaries and the awesome footnotes detailing library chases for manuscript copies that were compared, and in many instances the online versions available suck, but the texts are all out there.

Enough people over the years have asked me ‘what books to get’ on this subject and while I in no way claim any expertise on the subject beyond blind bibliomanical enthusiasm, I don’t think I’m steering anyone wrong with the list of ten texts below and mentioning the most active presses and scholars I’ve come across in my travels.

***


The Devil Rides Out

Magic texts are as old as the written word (actually older). The form is almost unique in it’s persistence: from the oral tradition, into the time of hand written manuscripts, through early printing, into mass publication and now witnessing the transition to electronic text. Given this lineage it’s not surprising much of it feels like poetry, the only other form to ride all of these waves. It’s also no surprise that some of these texts have extremely bad reputations. The fluid social/political/philosophical space these books inhabit by definition makes them a threat to the status quo.

Magical texts are always in motion and eternally up for grabs. They suggest totalizing systems without ever accomplishing that totality. All I can say is that this seems to be the point. Every text I’ve looked at has and seems to encourage differences and discrepancies. As more and more manuscript research is done, part of the confusion seems to be from transcription errors and other typical forms of errata, but some of these foibles seem willful. The mistruths in these texts, it is often said, are to separate the worthy from the unworthy. It is well known that some works were written with multiple interpretations in mind, but there’s evidence some of them have multiple systemic interpretations or different codes to interpret the symbols by. Many of the societies formed around these texts, secret and otherwise, have graded progressions or levels, and symbol sets get completely different meanings depending on the reader’s grade or level. Where you are as a reader has a place that is rarely given importance in other kinds of text. Many magical texts can feel completely different on subsequent readings and will open up the more you work with them and the topics they cover. In that sense alone these texts have a palpable effect on reality. I can attest to this personally.


In the Mouth of Madness

Looking at these books historically it is also stunning and heartening how truly multi-cultural and inclusive the works are. Magic seems ultimately to be about synthesis, and looking historically, the magical tradition seems to have the most purchase and power where cultures meet and interact. I have been continually shocked to find every continent’s thought structures at play in one place or another. What is termed the ‘western’ esoteric tradition has back-currents from and to Africa, Asia and even the Americas. Several European grimoires have entered into African and Caribbean magic traditions, usually as representations of ultimate taboo. John Dee’s famous black mirror came from America and is rumored to have belonged to an Aztec priest…


John Dee’s Obsidian Mirror

 

The List of Texts

Three Books of Occult Philosophy, Henry Cornelius Agrippa
Probably the most referred to of all of the grimoires, this book is a true encyclopedia of magical thought as it was beginning to shear away from accepted knowledge in the renaissance. Erudite in the high, Agrippa fluidly quotes between the Bible and the Christian apocrypha, The Jewish and hebraic occult traditions as well as the entire hellenic record. Chaldean and Islamic astrology have a prominent place, as well as most of the european folk remedies and cures. It was this later data that really marked the book for infamy: the perceived threat of witches and Ottoman expansion of the time made these materials ‘infernal’ in the eyes of his peers. Given all of the material covered and quoted, Donald Tyson’s fully annotated edition pictured here adds a value to the text that can’t be under estimated.



Book: http://www.amazon.com/Three-Occult-Philosophy-Llewellyns-Sourcebook/dp/0875428320/ref=pd_sim_sbs_bt_1



Online: http://www.esotericarchives.com/agrippa/

 

The Hieroglyphic Monad, John Dee
Second only to Aleister Crowley here in the English speaking world, John Dee is synonymous with magic and witchcraft. He’s gone through a significant makeover, being most recently the subject of an opera written by Blur/Gorillas architect Damon Albarn. The Monad is Dee’s first and most accessible magical text, written in a form mimicking Euclid’s Geometry which Dee had translated into English around the same time. With all the indicators of what was to come in what is now called Enochian magic, this text is shorter, clearer and much simpler than any of the Enochian texts, which are all dazzling in their own right. The Monad is a great introduction to the occult tradition and a great multiple-read text.



Book: http://www.amazon.com/Hieroglyphic-Monad-Dr-John-Dee/dp/157863203X/ref=tmm_pap_title_2?ie=UTF8&qid;=1328905487&sr;=8-2



Online: http://www.esotericarchives.com/dee/monad.htm


A full documentary on Dee I hesitate to post for it’s length (and slight bombast) but I’ve already posted Evil Dead bits and the soundtrack is all Coil!

 

• Aleister Crowley, The Book of the Law: Liber Al Vel Legis
If the Hieroglyphic Monad is short and clear, the Book of the Law is short and utterly opaque. Dictated from a revelation/possession experience in 1904 in Egypt, this text is the foundation of the Thelema tradition, the contemporary bridge between the historical traditions and the contemporary traditions that exist today. Firmly rooted in the ideas of the Corpus Hermeticum as well as the east-meets-west confluences and conflations that are really what the occult tradition is all about, the text has everything Crowley has to offer at his most lovable and obnoxious. An automatic poem with a sharp and tangled point, it even ends with the warning that the book should be destroyed after being read. Several annotated versions of the text, all titled The Law is for All are available, each surrounded by controversy. I am partial to the commentaries of Crowley’s secretary Israel Regardie, an accomplished occult philosopher in his own right. The Book of the Law’s importance as a magical text is argued intensely, but no one denies Crowley’s importance in transmitting the fire and enthusiasm for magic that has burned steadily in the popular consciousness ever since.



Book: http://www.amazon.com/Book-Law-Aleister-Crowley/dp/0877283346

Online: http://www.sacred-texts.com/oto/engccxx.htm

Video: 9th Gate (Fargus’s collection)

 

The Chemical Wedding of Christian Rosenkreutz

While not strictly a magical text, this allegorical story is a great ‘gateway’ into the mindset necessary to process a lot of the thinking found in magical texts. Surrealism as we know it today was heavily influenced by this text and the history that grew out of the alchemical and Rosicrucian traditions, of which The Chemical Wedding is considered the masterpiece. The merging of the symbolic, poetic and descriptive modes of writing makes for a dreamy, delusional and above all magical feeling that se
ems to be suggesting something above and beyond the simple ‘reading’ of the text. Indeed, the symbolism and structure of the text has been studied and interpreted rigorously since the work appearance in 1616.



Book: http://www.amazon.com/Chemical-Christian-Rosenkreutz-Hermetic-Sourceworks/dp/0933999356/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie;=UTF8&qid;=1328905631&sr;=1-1



Online: http://www.levity.com/alchemy/chymwed1.html

 

Picatrix: Ghayat Al-Hakim, Volumes I and II

Of the books coming from the orient to renaissance Italy, this tome seems to be architectonic for many of the magical threads we can find today. An arabic text made up of several smaller works discussing the making of talismans, the lunar calendar and its magical properties, it clearly influenced all of the renaissance magicians and was at that time considered among the most infernal texts. It is also an excellent example of how much cross-cultural influence these traditions have, clearly demonstrating the large part the Islamic world had in preserving the knowledge of antiquity. Only recently translated into English, there are now several versions available.



Book (this is a different translation from the one above but is well rated and contains both volumes): http://www.amazon.com/Complete-Picatrix-Classic-Astrological-Atratus/dp/1257767852/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid;=1328905994&sr;=8-1



Online (this is a summary and not the full text): http://www.esotericarchives.com/picatrix.htm

Video: 9th Gate (book making: the devil is in the details)

 

Sefer Yetzirah: The Book of Creation

The core text of Jewish mysticism, the correlation of alphabetic letter, number and the cosmos is here so elegant and systematic it is no wonder why Hebrew became the de-facto magical alphabet of choice. Most of the so-called angelic scripts are either ciphers of Hebrew or obviously derived from the letter system. Gemmatria, kabbalah, talismanic manipulation and many kinds of evocation and invocation owe their being to this text. Short and clear in it’s presentation, it is said this text existed orally for hundreds of years before it was written down in the early middle ages. Kaplan’s annotated version includes multiple translations and an in depth commentary that gives insight and clarity, whatever your familiarity with hebrew.



Book: http://www.amazon.com/Sefer-Yetzirah-Creation-Aryeh-Kaplan/dp/0877288550/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie;=UTF8&qid;=1328906136&sr;=1-1



Online: http://www.sacred-texts.com/jud/yetzirah.htm

 

The Book of Abramelin, Abraham von Worms

A degraded manuscript version of this text was a source document many of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn’s rituals were based on. The current translation is the result of almost 20 years of research and it opens up the text and clarifies many of the operations and procedures. Most importantly, the Book of Abramelin contains the blueprint of the HGA ritual (Holy Guardian Angel), an extremely involved ritual practice that really sets the bar for what kind of dedication a magical practice can require. The links to what we now know of the tantric, yogic and other eastern psycho/physical practices are amazing.



Book: http://www.amazon.com/Book-Abramelin-New-Translation/dp/089254127X/ref=sr_1_1

Online (This is an older translation): http://www.sacred-texts.com/grim/abr/index.htm

 

The Clavis or Key to the Magic of Solomon

A great new trend in contemporary magical publications has been facsimile editions of the more referred to manuscripts. Some of the most famous of these were penned by the victorian occultist Frederick Hockley. Most interested in scrying, Hockley a
lso copied occult manuscripts for his extensive library, a self-admitted bibliophile. The meticulous artistry exhibited in these documents transmits part of the pleasure of books and hand-made books in particular. This is a particularly interesting text to facsimile because of the number of variations of the Clavis or Keys that exist. The recent scholarship on these manuscripts is obsessive, detail oriented and wonderful to follow. Sifting between versions of talisman recipes underlines the personal, esoteric and process-oriented nature of these practices.

Solomonic grimoires show the intricacies and difficulty of dating and locating the origins of most Grimoires. Hundreds of manuscripts claiming the bible’s King Solomon as the author exist. None have proven to be nearly that old. The content of the texts is on one hand remarkably similar and on another intensely culturally specific, and examples of Solomonic grimoires have been found written in almost every language. The works definitely merit their own sub-category, but because of the way many of these texts were grouped together with other works the categories are fairly porous (see 9 and 10). The literature surrounding King Solomon (including the Bible) gives him great power as a controller of spirits (many were said to be marshaled in the construction of the first temple). This relationship between power and control of the spirit realm led to many stories up to the 19th century of powerful lords and their architects using ‘infernal labor‘ in their construction projects, particularly bridges.

Book (expensive, but it is an extensively annotated facsimile edition of a beautiful hand-rendered text): http://www.amazon.com/Clavis-Key-Magic-Solomon-Talismanic/dp/0892541598/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie;=UTF8&qid;=1328906684&sr;=1-1

Online (this is a completely different version, based on the same family of manuscripts but producing a very different text, and no pretty handwriting): http://www.sacred-texts.com/grim/kos/index.htm


From deGivry’s survey Magic Witchcraft and Alchemy


From deGivry’s survey Magic Witchcraft and Alchemy

 

The Veritable Key of Solomon

In 1889 S. L. MacGregor Mathers, one of the founders of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, published a text called the Key of Solomon, ostensibly starting the entire field of research/enthusiasm for what are now termed the Solomonic grimoires. There are hundreds of them and the divisions separating them can be minute and immense. While Peterson’s facsimile of Hockley’s manuscript gives a singular focus to the Solomonic tradition, Skinner and Rankine’s compendium of Keys (there are three separate tracts in this text) seeks to orient the reader to the different clusters of documents that have been translated and published over the years and given the Solomonic modifier. The research shows just how inter-penetrating and intermixed these manuscripts had become over several hundred years of clandestine transmission. Clear in the confusion, the reader gets a sense of some of the materials Agrippa, Dee and our other protagonists had access to in their researches. The book comes from the Sourceworks of Ceremonial Magic series, now numbering eight volumes, all of which of the highest quality and detail.



Book: http://www.amazon.com/Veritable-Solomon-Sourceworks-Ceremonial-Magic/dp/0738714534/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid;=1328987337&sr;=8-1



Online (One version from a specific manuscript, different from the ones referred to in the book, but comparable): http://www.esotericarchives.com/solomon/sl3847.htm

 

The Arbatel of Magic

The Arbatel represents a renaissance streamlining of many of the threads of the occult tradition being formed and reevaluated. Insisting on an ‘olympian’ character of the planetary influences, the system described feels both pagan and judaeo-christian in it’s origins and makes for a somewhat unique and syncretic voice in the literature. Also of note is that unlike most texts, which claim an almost always apocryphal antiquity, this text was first printed in 1536 and seems to have been written at that time. Whereas Agrippa’s text is clear in his sources to the point of confusion (without a commentary I think most readers will be lost), the Arbetel is almost simple in it’s presentation. This gives it a somewhat privileged place in the lore, as it is an extremely ‘user friendly’ text. Peterson’s modernized translation makes it more so and the edition available is elegant and erudite. It also smells delicious.



Book: http://www.amazon.com/Arbatel-Concerning-Ancients-Joseph-Peterson/dp/0892541520/ref=sr_1_7?s=books&ie;=UTF8&qid;=1328907812&sr;=1-7

Online: http://www.esotericarchives.com/solomon/arbatel.htm

 

Notes

The three sections below are gravy for people who want more information. I also wanted to specifically mention these small presses as I think they are quite amazing, some making books that are art quality objects. While I don’t totally agree with Giles’s sentiments stated in the opening clip of this post I do feel that there is an experience in books that is unique, that books should share our thinking space with these new technologies rather than be replaced by them.

 

Presses

Ouroboros Press

The Golden Hoard Press (Sourceworks of Ceremonial Magic)

Magnum Opus Books/Alchemy Web Bookshop

Teitan Press

 

Scholars/Translators

Frances Yates

Aryeh Kaplan

Adam McLean

Joscelyn Godwin

Donald Tyson

Stephen Skinner

David Rankine

Joseph H. Peterson

 

Additional Reference Texts

* I could list hundreds of books here but have chosen the ones I’ve found myself needing to refer to the most. Tyson’s edition of Agrippa can make up for most of the gaps, but if you find yourself getting comparative in your analyses and want primary data, these books have helped a ton. I’m not including any eastern or hellenic source works, although Ovid and the Upanishads etc… of course are relevant…

777
Aleister Crowley’s collection and correlation of tables. These get a little funky the further you get into the material record and begin comparing the data, but it is a notable and fairly reliable (and precedent setting) collection of the tabulations and correlations of thousands of years of magical data.

The Complete Magician’s Tables
Stephen Skinner’s answer to the missing facts and errata that have surfaced since 777‘s publication. Much more useful and accurate ultimately than 777, it is reverent to and respectful of the document it owes fealty to.

The Torah
Commentated and scrutinized in a completely different manner, the book of course gives insight to many of the specifically Hebraic structures that appear in much of this material.

The Bible
One way or another you will come back here. As something to react for or against (‘I keep the Bible in a pool of blood so that none of it’s lies can affect me’ is a good Slayer quote for the moment), the Bible is there looming in the background of most of this material. Over the years I’ve come to appreciate much of the text, and realize that like all infernal books it’s what you do with it that counts.

The Qur’an
Much more of the occult tradition is built on concepts in this book that most would at first think and it is pretty embarrassing how ignorant we are in (America at least) of what is in this book…

The Nag Hammadi Scriptures
For those leery of the ‘good books’ mentioned above (like me), the Nag Hammadi scriptures can ease some of the frustrations the Torah/Bible/Qur’an as a reference can cause. These texts also open up a universe of religious and mystical thought that was virtually unknown to the modern world prior to their discovery in the 40s. Much more mystical and concerned with the individual than made it into the good books, and you can see a pattern of control that got exercised by excluding many of these thought bombs…

The Corpus Hermeticum
This collection’s influence on magical texts cannot be underestimated. It also links many of the other occult traditions, especially alchemy. Presumed to be of deep Egyptian antiquity for centuries, it is actually 2nd century, close in age to the Nag Hammadi codices and sharing many of their ideas.
—-

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** Laura, Hi, there you are. Nothing like family drama to create a full body vortex. Sorry. Russia had/has the lion’s share of contemporary cannibals, if my researcher memory serves. Why, I don’t know, other than Russians I know saying the police, etc. there are almost completely corrupt. Ah, you’re adding to rather thin cannibal fiction genre. It’s a genre ripe to be conquered. I supposedly get my visa on May 7. That’s my appointment date. Not counting my veritable chickens. Thanks re: my eyes. One time when I was at university eating in the cafeteria a girl I didn’t know walked up to me and told me I had beautiful eyes. It confused me, and I asked my friends, ‘Do I have beautiful eyes?’, and they looked at me like I was crazy, and said ‘No’. ** _Black_Acrylic, Or maybe the charismatic ones manage to evade the authorities? Probably not, or only in the movies. ** Dominik, Hi!!! Oh, shit, I think it did eat your comment. Maybe the blog was anticipating yesterday’s post. Yes, I swear I didn’t invent Gheorghe Dincă, but it’s uncanny. If love finds that assessment, err, pass it on. Love wondering what a mannequin of himself would look like, G. ** kenley, Hi. Haha, I hope it was because of the alliteration. It’s true, or I agree, about the true crime stuff. Back before the internet there used to be these quite sleazy true crime magazines that you could buy at the corner shop that got into the nitty gritty, and I read them voraciously when I was planning my Cycle books looking for ways into that material, but even they were very superficial. I think the monster killer guys themselves are just not deep guys. There’s a lesson in there somewhere. Oh, no! Dumped? A clearly unworthy dude, but that won’t stop the pain. Onwards and upwards, maestro. I’m so sorry though. xoxo. ** Carsten, I will admit I wondered if your recent absence was health related. So sorry. That sounds miserable. When I had my fairly recent bout of awful illness, whatever it was, the thing that helped as much or more than the antibiotics was the steroids they prescribed. Maybe they’d help? I don’t know. I’m fine with normal eyes again, thanks. I’ve had friends tell me that the book ‘Eaters of the Dead: Myths and Realities of Cannibal Monsters’ is enlightening, but I haven’t read it. ** jay, Hi! Yeah, pretty bleak, I guess. And rare and scattered, yeah. I’m always surprised that there are relatively very few cannibals on the master/slave sites. Speaks to the poverty of their imaginations. No, I don’t know ‘Cruel God Reigns’ or even of it. It does sound very intriguing. I wonder if it’s something that would be in Paris’s rather seemingly good manga stores. There used to be practically a whole little street here lined with nothing but manga and related accoutrement stores. I wonder if that’s still the case. Hm. Thanks. That’s very curiosity making. You good? ** Steve, I’m glad to hear ‘TTofW’ holds up. There have long been, yes, rumors that Fassbinder secretly co-directed it. Haha, hi, Armie! I think you’re right about that horrorcore rapper but the name escapes me. I’ll look. ** julian, Hi. There were probably a lot of reasons why I wanted to tackle cannibalism in that work. There was the fact that I never had, so that challenge interested me. Also there was this genre of bleak, depressing Russian twink porn that was popular at the time that interested me a lot because of how bleak it was — the models were visibly quite poor street guys who didn’t even pretend that they were into the sex they were having — and there was one model that guys who frequented the related message boards kept saying they wished they could eat, and I went back and looked at him again, and I thought, ‘Yeah, I could see eating him’, and that weird realisation probably played into the decision too. Stuff like that. Yeah, Lydia Lunch is cool through and through. I think she has a podcast or vidcast that I keep meaning to listen to/watch. Have you followed that? ** Bill, Oh, wow, I’m going to chase down ‘I Love Cannibal’. That’s wild. You seen it? No, I wasn’t targeting location in my research. Russia just kept popping up. A solo set, excellent! Please video or record it or something. Awesome! Godwaffle Noise Pancakes is a wonderful name, I must say. ** Charalampos, Even among the most hardcore completist Pollard collectors, no one has managed to collect all the ‘Propellor’ editions. That’s the unreachable nirvana. Morning from a Rue in Paris. ** Gustavo, Hi. I’m not big on Aster’s films either. I do think he sometimes takes kind of interesting chances in a formal way. So sometimes I appreciate that he’s trying to experiment a bit. ‘Fat Girl’ is a good one. I liked ‘Resident Evil 7’. Have you played ‘Resident Evil: Village’? That’s my favorite of the recent ones. You’re not jaded, they are kind of funny, but then I’m not a normal person. And neither are you, it seems! This week: my filmmaking collaborator Zac just gave me his final notes on the script for our next film, so I’ll be making the changes and hopefully finishing the script for good this week or early next week. Otherwise, I don’t know. Good question. ** Adem Berbic, I knew it! Well, I didn’t know it, but yay on the cat’s getting bored of freedom and feeling ready to reenter your prison. Nice prison, of course. Mallarmé is probably a better or more pleasurable writer than Hegel though, no? Once you find your bearings, riding a unicycle while juggling becomes a cakewalk, believe it or not. Good morning. ** HaRpEr //, Relaxation of the Asshole’ is a one-timer record if there ever was one. But yeah, Pollard’s between songs inebriated concert blathering are legendary amongst the fold. Right, me neither re: romanticising being sick even though I’m rarely sick. There was a brief time in the early Emo era when I would see Emos in Paris sporting fake crutches and big bandages on their heads and things. It did look awfully cool. John Rechy, ugh. ** Nicholas., Yeah, France is more hilly than mountainous until you get down in the south where there’s the Alps and Pyrenees. I think if I was a house I’d be a loft in some city’s former warehouse district. Movie land … still arranging the last batch of screenings before the thing starts streaming and living on a BluRay. The next film is going to be rather episodic but with no commercials in between them or anything. ** rewritedept, Howdy. I really like ‘Lost Highway’ but I think if Lynch had let me do a final edit on it and removed a few scenes like the annoying Marilyn Manson stuff it would have been a masterpiece. I know about the failed ‘Glamorama’ film, yeah. Never say never though. My fave BEE is ‘Lunar Park’. Thanks about my stuff, pal. ** Right. Today I’ve restored a quite informative old post made for the blog by the visual artist and occult scholar Jesse Bransford. Dig in. See you tomorrow.

19 Comments

  1. jay

    Hey Dennis! Esoteric alchemical stuff is cool, but I’m always a bit shocked to find out some people still actually live/believe in it. The guy I lived with for a bit last year was totally obsessed with it, to a kind of scary degree, it was all he consumed or talked about. Sadly I don’t think he owned any grimoires.

    I sort of doubt Cruel God Reigns is available anywhere, it’s both really old and really long, as well as a bit uncomfortable – the main boy starts a relationship with his adult stepbrother, and the manga’s sort of 50:50 on whether or not it’s a good or bad thing for him to experience, given that the other guy is violent and pretty uninterested in his personhood. This chapter’s probably quite a good representation of the whole thing, the fan translation’s quite good, even if there are some amusingly Kinbotey arguments in the margins about the usage of the word “lover”. Anyway, I’m doing well, I hope you are too. See you!

    • fish

      I’m not usually a manga reader, but this description is encouraging me to check it out, thanks!

      • jay

        Thank you, I hope you enjoy it!

  2. Dominik

    Hi!!

    That could be it, haha! I’m glad yesterday’s comment didn’t get eaten – it didn’t show up on my end when I checked, but when I tried to resend it, the blog informed me that I’d already commented the same thing. So I’m glad everything seems to have worked out in the end.

    Love actually did find Austin Harouff’s assessment: https://www.scribd.com/document/403637223/Austin-Harrouff-psychiatric-evaluation

    I’d be curious about a mannequin of myself too. I guess it’d be a little creepy but potentially informative? If it’s realistic enough. Love wondering, whenever he sees a pacifier on the ground (which is more often than one would think, since he lives next to a kindergarten), whether the parents didn’t notice that it had fallen or whether they just decided not to pick it up, Od.

  3. Adem Berbic

    I’d like to believe that your (and certain other DC’s-dwellers’) continued faith in the cat’s return bent the universe into submission, because things were getting pretty bleak in my own mind, so thank you for that.

    Oh, definitely agreed on Mallarmé vs Hegel, but I think one can draw a very loose analogy between the experience of reading each of them. That Mallarmé thing where each piece is operating on a literal, conceptual and materiality-of-language level, and it becomes more about the relations (or lack thereof) between each of them than their positive content in a vertiginous way – if you take that, and make everything a lot more tedious, you kind of have how it feels to read Hegel.

    Mallarmé did apparently have a Hegel phase which crops up in the stuff about negativity and abstraction and the Idea, which is what I used to find most interesting in him but probably less so now. I think I want to spent the weekend rereading Mallarmé and Rimbaud in the sun, ideally with the cat sleeping next to me.

    Unfortunately I’m not sure if I can rethink my Faulkner thought. I think something to the effect of seeing a work as a freestanding and self-sufficient thing with form equalling content, versus as expressing or capturing something external to it (or in other words, is the power in the ambiguity of the work’s relationship with the reader or the writer). Which is a pretty facile distinction but that’s how my brain tends to sift things. Anyway, there was more of a point to it at 1am than there is now.

    Re: cannibals, that whole arena’s been on my mind off the back of the Fred West book Charlotte suggested I read, which is propulsive enough but not mind-blowing. I think my limited interest in all that stuff starts and ends with (this is so painfully highbrow) how it demonstrates the impossibility of transgression. I.e., here’s what sounds like the most extreme/transgressive action possible, but you’re actually just left fiddling with a jumble of nasty-smelling goop, or compulsively serial killing in roughly the same guilty way that someone else might jerk off too much of something. It always ends up being very small, when it seems like it should be big. So I’ve never fully understood how people like Martin can find a limitless interest in these kinds of subjects. Well, I wish any single thing could interest me as much as Nilsen seems to fascinate Martin.

  4. _Black_Acrylic

    Today’s post puts me in mind of James Champagne’s decadent classic Grimoire which upended the rules of reality back in 2011. I did once fancy myself as a wannabe occult scholar back in the day but sadly I just never had the attention span for it.

  5. Charalampos

    Hi
    Do you remember the names of these true crime magazines? Curious
    Did you incorporate images from them into collage work or my imagination is running wild? I think often of the beautiful image of the tied up boy floating over this landscape that is I think in Gone, not that I own it yet just seen it online
    I wonder how did this eatable guy from the message boards looks
    Hi from sunny under the sun Chania Crete

  6. julian

    I’ve been very into the occult lately, especially chaos magic(k), but I still feel like I’ve barely scratched the surface of any of this stuff. There’s so much writing out there and most of it is so esoteric that it’s hard to know where to start. I’ll definitely be coming back to this post. I tried reading The Book of the Law and realized it may not be the best entry point into Crowley given that I admittedly understood very little of it. I’ve been reading Austin Osman Spare, whose work I’ve been getting more out of. Interesting, about the cannibalism thing. From what I’ve seen of those Russian twink porn actors I don’t think there would be a lot of good meat on them, but I guess that’s not the point LOL. Do you remember the name of the porn actor? I’ve noticed that gay porn from the 2000’s generally has a bleaker tone, even to a lesser extent in the American videos. I wonder why that is. Maybe something to do with the fact that PrEP wasn’t yet widely available, so gay sex seemed more dangerous? Or maybe it was just the drab look of those old digital camcorders. I listen to the Lydia Lunch podcast whenever they have someone I’m interested in on it, like Jarboe or Jamie Stewart. The episodes usually start with about 20 or so minutes of just her and her co-host talking about whatever they want before they bring on the guest, which I usually skip, but the conversations can be pretty interesting, especially when she knows the guest.

    • rewritedept

      if you want a good starter on crowley, the book of thoth is great for theory, astrological associations, and tarot. book 4 is quite helpful and packs a load of info into a very short space. i have a few other titles i can recommend if you’d like.

  7. Carsten

    How kind of you to worry about my absence. Yeah I’m definitely a man of rituals & routines, & popping in here at least once a day is one of them. It takes either stress or sickness to derail me.

    I got that specialist lined up now, who confirmed that he can take a swab & send it to the lab. Gotta get to the bottom of this. Today I was a bit more mobile & my gut has calmed down somewhat. Was able to eat without struggling to keep it down & went for a short walk. But right after the walk I felt like I had run a marathon, & there’s no way those are just antibiotic after-effects.

    I will bring up the steroids when I see the specialist. Were you given them to boost your overall immune system & well-being or to kill whatever virus was plaguing you?

    Interesting topic today. Nice work there Jesse Bransford!

    Those old European patchwork manuscripts & their histories are fascinating. Jesse’s absolutely right in saying that magical texts are older than the written word. In fact, they’re among the oldest forms of poetry in existence. Now in much of the world, where an oral tradition was kept alive, such poetry remained intact. Being part of an ongoing deep culture, where the oral tradition continued being used in contemporary sacred practice, kept the poetry pure from outside influence or missionary censorship. Europe’s tougher though, due to its very early christianization & the fact that pagan traditions were either snuffed out or driven underground. A lot of Europe’s most astounding pagan poems come down to us in manuscripts written by monks. Manuscripts which are, for the most part, patchwork assemblages. So you’ll leaf through pages of missionary propaganda mixed with dubious history before suddenly coming across the “Song of Amergin” in a history of Ireland, or the “Nine Herbs Charm” in an old medical book, or the Taliesin poems in a history of Wales.

    This always brings me back to Rothenberg’s mantra: “Primitive means complex”. When you consider all the loss of deep knowledge brought about by literacy, compounded with scribal errors, copying mistakes, fading or damaged manuscripts & sheer misunderstandings or willful distortions, “the written word” suddenly seems a lot less civilized. One of my favorite questions to ask folks when arguing this topic (which you can tell I like doing): what’s more civilized, the ability to accurately memorize, recite & pass on complex volumes of oral text, or the need to rely on a fragile, fault-prone system of notation called writing in order to preserve it?

    Sorry, this got long I think, but you know this is my jam, haha.

  8. Marbella Photographer

    Grimoires in a wedding context is an interesting twist. I wonder how they tie into the themes of the day.

  9. Gustavo

    Hi.
    I still haven’t played Resident Evil: Village, I have been recently going through the games chronologically, my favorite is Resident Evil 2 Remake. I think Resident Evil 7 is great, specially the Baker family, I think they are the heart of the game in a way. A friend of mine completed Resident Evil Requiem recently in just two days, he said it is pretty good.

    Glad you are progressing on your script. Not wanting to be nosy, but what will it be about thematically speaking? If you can answer, of course.

    On the post, I am very ignorant when it comes to the occult, it seems rather interesting tho. I am more of a UFO guy, despite not believing in them.

  10. HaRpEr //

    Hey! That black mirror belonging to John Dee is in the British museum and I’ve seen it countless times. They have a couple other of his things, too. Side note: I think he was believed to have owned the Voynich manuscript at one point, which is something I’m very interested in.
    With chaos magick and stuff, I find that the methods can be more interesting than the madness. In an artistic context specifically I mean. I’ve been reading a lot about Artaud lately and just read this book of his last writings. I was really drawn to this detail about how he used to write these hexes for people he didn’t like, which he called his ‘spells’. They were a mixture between poems and drawings, and he’d burn holes in important details with cigarettes. The existing photos are quite beautiful.
    You see an increasing number of celebrities these days talking about manifestation but in a way that’s totally removed from anything esoteric and more in a vaguely ex-christian sort of way. Some people, not just celebrities, really swear by it. I’m sort of interested to read the book that Alex Kazemi wrote about it.

    I read this fairly recent interview with John Rechy where he was going about how much he hated the word ‘queer’ because he thinks it makes straight people smile to say a former-pejorative. Sorry, but ‘queer’ hasn’t been a slur for an awfully long time. There’s something about that specific line of thinking which really makes me think that you’ve got to have a pretty narrow mind, though the guy is like 100. I guess he was sort of interested in assimilation just by the nature of categorising gay life, even if he’d totally reject that notion.

  11. Steve

    How much of this material did you read while working on GUIDE? Any time I’ve dipped into it, my head immediately starts swimming (though Justin Sledge’s Youtube channel Esoterica is worth a look).

    If anything, my vision is getting worse. The flouter has not cleared up. I called my eye doctor today and made an appointment to see him next week.

    • Steve

      PS: here’s another YouTube find, Fruitier Than Thou: https://www.youtube.com/@FruitierThanThou. They’ve posted 5,000 music sessions and concerts recorded by the BBC, going beyond John Peel’s death and up to the near present.

  12. kenley

    hi hi!

    ahhh! spooky shit!!!!! ive been very grounded in “reality” lately and its really been a bummer…perhaps its time for me to get occult w it. ill have to pick thru this post! chaos magick is such an interesting provocation to me, but my knowledge of it is sooooo surface level

    yeah…idk, sometimes shit just kinda Happens. like, war sure doesnt make any goddam sense, and yet there it is, Happening All of the Time. so why should, like, suburban cannibalism make “sense”? idk if thats cynical/dumb. hmm. did digging into the true crime annals feel different for the cycle as it did for, say, jerk?

    gah. he’s a dummy and im pretty sad abt the whole thing, but oh well. ive impulsively decided to escape my woes for a little while in montreal. was reading good morning midnight on the train ride over today and was like, “am i about to do the canadian version of this”? aaaaanyway. hope youre not doing the original recipe version of rhysian despondence today!

  13. Hugo

    Hi Dennis

    I’m a bit sick rn so I’m kept up a good bit. I’m falling back into my periodical Micheal Jackson obsession because of the new biopic (which I am not going to see). Do you think MJ would have been a better artist if he was a cannibal? I feel like he’s one of the top 10 weirdest guys to have ever lived so I think about him a lot. I sometimes think about writing about him, but I don’t think it would go far because MJ fans are a touchy bunch, he’s kinda like mormonism.

  14. rewritedept

    d-

    yeah, lunar park is probably my second favorite ellis. just a heartbreaker of a book, and the prologue is some of the funniest material he’s ever written.

    i have several of the grimoires listed in today’s post. my favorite of my collection is this one called touch me not, though, which is an old german grimoire from the 1500s or thereabouts with a lot of notes on demonology and some of the most incredible illustrations, but i also have a lot of crowley and the keys of solomon, both greater and lesser keys.

    i thought god jr was out of print, but it appears to be in stock. a friend of mine from work wants to read it so i’m gonna grab him a copy.

    uneventful day again. made a big batch of marinara sauce at work today, which took up most of my shift so my day went pretty quickly. played dead moon, ted leo, jehu, thingy, bowie at work. really like thingy. as established, rob crow rules, and that’s definitely one of his most rewarding projects.

    one more day of nights and i’m all done. hope yr thursday is full of joy and goodness. talk soon.

    -me.

  15. Laura

    will i be on time? =D

    ha! @Jesse in restored form, cool. <3 as per one of my fav definitions of magic, it's basically reality bending to desire’. reckon the desire part is doing a lot of work there.

    def think the Islamic occult arts, which we call 3ulum al-ghariba (the weird sciences lol) aren’t well known enough outside of muslim/adjacent contexts, which is a pity. Islam is a contact religion, sort of this trusty bridge between east and west, so both it and just Islamic culture in general put the constructs of east snd west more in their right place in the continuum.

    obvi as per my Andalusi background i’d recommend The Picatrix which in Arabic is Ghayat Al-7kim (the aim of the wise) and doesn’t sound like a saturday morning kid show lol. p cool bc it’s basically this effortless mix of Bizantine Hermeticism and Neoplatonism, Sassanid, Sabian and Indian astrology and talismanic tradition. actually a core book to understand the later European Renaissance.

    ofc most of the Islamic occult is haram as per legalists, but it’s been thoroughly enjoyed by normal people since forever lol. even as a sort of ultraprayer. and then there are obvi all of the folk islams. this days i’d say magic in particular scares a bunch of folks but we’re all into astrology to some extent or other. there’s this guy on X Twitter, Ali A Olomi, who is a Muslim historian amongst other stuff, v into cosmology/astrology and i totally recommend following.

    @DC go w the girls! =D you def have lovely eyes, she knew what she was saying and your bros at the table were just being too broey that day i think.

    i’ve got not one but two types of cannibal in the novel lol, one is way sadder than the other.

    visa for you on the 7th or i miiight have to become a weird scientist, astaghfirullah =D

    <3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2026 DC's

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑