The blog of author Dennis Cooper

Author: DC (Page 358 of 1092)

_Black_Acrylic presents … Fungus the Bogeyman Day



 

Fungus the Bogeyman is a 1977 children’s picture book by British artist Raymond Briggs. It follows one day in the life of the title character, a working class Bogeyman with the mundane job of scaring human beings.

The book follows a typical day for Fungus the Bogeyman, starting when he wakes up and ending just before he falls asleep. As his day progresses, he undergoes a mild existential crisis, pondering what his seemingly pointless job of scaring surface people is really for. He is a member of the Bogey society, which is very similar to British society, but Bogeymen enjoy things which humans (called Drycleaners because of their contrasting environmental preferences) would not be comfortable around; for example darkness, damp, cold and over-ripe food. The book depicts the mundane details of Bogey life in loving detail, with definitions of Bogey slang and numerous annotations concerning the myths, pets, hobbies, literature, clothing and food of the Bogeys.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fungus_the_Bogeyman

 

 

Melancholy, erudite, beautiful, funny. Fungus the Bogeyman is a lovingly created work of art, with as much care and thought in the words as in the images. Almost documentary-style, the book follows a day in the life of the title character, his work and home life, and along the way introduces the culture and manners of his people, the Bogeys, whose occupation is frightening humans, also known as the surface-dwelling “Dry Cleaners”. As the day progresses, we learn more about Fungus and his philosophical self-doubt.

Through the richly-detailed pages, contrasts and parallels are revealed between the gentle, disgusting Bogeys, and humans.
Tom Hurst https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/4711469513

 

 

It has been called “the nastiest book ever published for children,” and it stands in a pivotal position among the picture books of the British artist-writer Raymond Briggs. Fungus the Bogeyman offers both the most fully developed fantasy and the most outrageous affront to conventional mores of all Briggs’s children’s books to date. It also marks the midpoint of a philosophic curve Briggs has been tracing from the cheerful confidence of Jim and the Beanstalk (1970), to the black despair of When the Wind Blows (1982). A close look at Fungus reveals the common concerns that tie these two extremes together, and that make the last book a wholly logical development from the first. Bogies, according to K.M. Briggs’s Encyclopedia of Fairies, comprise “a whole class of mischievous, frightening and even dangerous spirits whose delight it is to torment mankind.” From this basis in folklore, Raymond Briggs has postulated a race of large, blobby, green-skinned beings who inhabit their own underground world. At night (their day), the Bogeymen emerge to carry on their “work”—frightening human beings with mysterious footsteps, scrapings on windowpanes, and an occasional graveyard appearance; they also cause boils. But we see the daily life of Fungus at home too, eating breakfast with his wife and son, bicycling off to work, and stopping off at a pub on the way back. Meanwhile, as an anonymous narrator fills in a complete picture of Bogeydom, lecturing in academic style on Bogey culture, sports, flora, fauna, and anatomy, Briggs utilizes the full subcreative power of fantasy, supposing not only magical powers (as he does in Father Christmas and The Snowman), but a race of imaginary beings and their entire world. Fungus is Briggs’s most deeply fantastic book for children and his most startling. Indeed, both in form and in content, it could scarcely be better calculated to repel the adult reader—or intrigue the young one.
SuzanneRahn https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236787432_Beneath_the_Surface_with_Fungus_the_Bogeyman

 

 

Far from being a simple celebration of all things wet and slimy, Briggs’ book creates an upside-down underworld where a gloomy nihilism is the order of the day, and with whose attitudes Briggs clearly has some sympathy. The book was first published in 1977 and has a definite punky, “no future”, Sex Pistols quality.

The Bogeymen have something of the grumpy old man about them. They abhor anything new, and for that reason do not buy newspapers, but rather oldspapers. Posters on the walls advertise events long since passed.

It is an appealingly slow world. Bicycle tyres are filled with goo and sailboats are square-fronted to ensure slow sailing. Their games, such as pig-sticking and tiddlywinks, are non-competitive and can last for days. In Bogeyball, there is no cheering or shouting and the players glide dreamily around in the thick mud, with a grace, Briggs says, “which makes the fussy scrurrying around of Surface footballers appear slightly ridiculous”. The purpose of angling is to avoid catching fish, and any Bogey who does so will retire shamefacedly to a bar.

 

 

Bogeys love sleep and the outdoors is dotted with dreamholes, whey they will retire for a nap. When their problems appear insurmountable, they simply retreat form the world and may go to sleep for up to a year in specially created graveyard-like zones called “interests”.

The book masterfully combines a thorough anatomy of Bogeyworld with a meditation on the futility of existence. As Fungus moves slowly through his day (or, I should say, his night, since Bogeys are nocturnal), he is given to such reflections as “Not to reason why… not ask questions… just keep bogling away”.

And that brings us to the vexed question of the Bogeyman’s job: frightening humans. In the book, it is Bogeys like Fungus who spend their nights separating socks, kicking tiles off the roof, creaking the stairs and banging the dustbin lids. They also press their green fingers on the necks of sleeping humans in order to create boils. Why?

All of Briggs’s work is great but I think Fungus is his masterpiece.
Tom Hodgkinson https://www.theguardian.com/books/booksblog/2007/apr/24/whatimreadingfungusthebog

 

 

Raymond Redvers Briggs, an only child, was born in midwinter 1934 to Ethel, a lady’s maid, and Ernest, a milkman. Long before they appeared as themselves in the deeply moving Ethel & Ernest in 1998, Mr and Mrs Briggs floated in and out of their son’s books like kindly spirits. Believe it or not, Fungus the Bogeyman was inspired by Ethel, whose sweetness is very much at the fore. A less than earnest milkman offers Tilly 20 pints to feed her ursine guest in The Bear and greets Father Christmas with a knowing ‘Still at it, mate?’, as he makes his own chilly rounds. Briggs dedicated Father Christmas to them both following their deaths in 1971.

Briggs has written of his regret at how often people take the fact of having a family for granted. In Notes from the Sofa, a compilation of his witty columns for The Oldie, he jests about inviting his — a lone cousin — to a ‘big family get-together’ for Christmas. Should he hire a hall? Tragically, Briggs lost his wife Jean, who was schizophrenic, to leukaemia the year Father Christmas was published. Liz, his partner since around 1975, passed away in 2015. While Briggs often spends the season with her children and grandchildren, he cannot help but think of those who have no one at this time of year.

Isolation is very much at the heart of his books. Father Christmas has an entire turkey, pudding and ‘party size’ bottle of red to himself. Not too shabby, you think, eyeing his enormous feast. And yet, here’s the chap who enters more homes than anyone else, resigned to spending Christmas day alone, with only his cat, dog, and beloved deers for company. He has just about the loneliest job in the world.

As a child, of course, it doesn’t occur to you to pity him. You are too busy laughing as he brushes his hair and beard simultaneously — separate brushes, please — and rests his derrière on the outside latrine. The young imagination overcomes loneliness by conjuring company out of thin air. Such is the phenomenon Briggs’s books celebrate. Characters emerge fully formed, the Snowman so human that he covers where his genitals should be after trying on some trousers, feeling, like Adam, shame at his nudity for the first time. Only when you reread these books in adulthood do you comprehend the sadness through which imaginary friends may grow and perish.

You may not be surprised to learn that Briggs — who trained at Wimbledon School of Art, Central, and the Slade — is an admirer of Bruegel the Elder. The artist’s peasant-filled winter landscapes have a darkness that permeates the beauty of their setting. Where Bruegel’s snow is so thick it looks unlikely ever to thaw, Briggs’s is as fine as the lines that describe it. Like the imagination, it is transient, destined to melt into puddles, like those of The Puddleman.
Daisy Dunn https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-grumpy-genius-of-raymond-briggs

 

 

I was 12 when Fungus came out in 1977. I bought it with my pocket money from High Hill Bookshop (RIP) in Hampstead High Street in north London and pored over it for hours in a state of repulsed yet instantly adoring fascination. The disgusting detail! The spirit of punk that informed every frame!

But the sensibility of the Briggs cohort was so wildly inventive, so risk-taking and unafraid, so art-school in its outlook, that I worry we will not see their like again. I think it’s because this sensibility was adult. Many of today’s writers and illustrators write as though they were children, with a faux-naif child’s sensibility.

Briggs and so on were very clearly adults, making books for children. This meant their work was meaty and had real heft. Fungus is essentially having an existential crisis — he spends the day wondering what he is for. Father Christmas is knackered, highly irritable, and he needs a drink, which makes his flashes of tenderness all the more affecting.

Illustration is supposed to show you surface, but these illustrators took us far beneath that — some of their work was almost novelistic and therefore deeply satisfying.

I worry that some of this is lost with some contemporary children’s picture books, which seem so nicely and predictably behaved. They are thoughtful and inclusive, which is obviously great, they teach a nice moral lesson about sharing or suchlike, hurrah (and also, slightly, yawn), but the most anarchic or subversive they get is poo, pants and fart jokes — all of which have their place, and many of which are funny, though perhaps not as hideously funny as the Plop-Up edition of Fungus the Bogeyman. But they are not thrilling.

You don’t gasp as you turn the page. You aren’t shocked, and there isn’t that sense of being absolutely and instantly submerged in a whole other world where strange things might happen.

Perhaps this is why the Snowmans and Funguses of the world, along with the entire oeuvre of Roald Dahl, endure. At least they haven’t been cast out into the wilderness.

If novels by Jane Austen and Charlotte Brontë now come with trigger warnings, as has been reported — I do wonder how young people, raised on porn and video games, are apparently left cowering by the deeds of fictional characters — then that leaves Fungus perilously exposed, trousers down and on the lav, probably, which is just the way he’d like it.
India Knight https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/snowman-author-knew-kids-werent-snowflakes-666fp5x7c

 

 

Raymond Briggs, who has died aged 88, did a great deal to elevate the art of illustration to being something much more than a servant of the written word. Though he was best known for his hugely popular books Father Christmas (1973) and The Snowman (1978), his output also explored themes such as war, politics and the environment through a deeply human, very British lens that often settled on the quiet heroism of ordinary lives.

Briggs may be seen to sit comfortably in the English anecdotal tradition exemplified by Randolph Caldecott in the 19th century and Edward Ardizzone in the 20th, but his often wordless graphic literature built bridges between the picture book and the comic or graphic novel, introducing a new way of reading to the adult publishing market, or at least asking grownups to relearn the business of reading a silent visual sequence.

Fungus the Bogeyman (1977) could be seen as a character very much close to home, displaying as he does an extreme version of the author’s own tendency to be outspoken and impatient.

At Hamish Hamilton the newly arrived editor Julia MacRae (later to set up her own imprint) played a major role in developing the artist’s career. The illustrator John Lawrence, who was also published by Hamish Hamilton, recalled those days with great fondness: “All the talk was about ‘is the world ready for Fungus the Bogeyman?’ and we all turned up at the launch party in green wellingtons surrounded by buckets of suspicious-looking green liquid, wondering whether it might be the wine.”

Briggs’s keen interest in narrative drawing was not welcomed at Wimbledon School of Art, which was rooted in traditional representational painting. He recalled: “I had gone to art school to learn to draw so as to become a cartoonist. But I was soon told that cartooning was an even lower form of life than commercial art.”

Loyal and playful, an inveterate practical joker. Lord once made the mistake of confessing to a dislike of dogs in the presence of Briggs, thereby immediately committing himself to becoming the recipient of all manner of canine-related gifts on subsequent birthdays and Christmases. Like so many of his characters, Briggs’s grumpiness never quite managed to conceal an underlying warmth and kindness.
Martin Salisbury https://www.theguardian.com/books/2022/aug/10/raymond-briggs-obituary

 

 

 

*

p.s. Hey. Today the mighty musical curator, writer, bon vivant, style icon and upstanding DC’s veteran _Black_Acrylic (aka Ben Robinson) commandeers the blog with my supreme blessing to pay tribute to his (and many people’s) favorite work by the recently and sadly late British artist Raymond Briggs. It’s quite a treat, folks, so give it your all and please, if you don’t mind, send a word or more in your comments to _Black_Acrylic to thank him for his generous and pointed work. Thanks, and thank you ever so much, Ben. ** Florian-Seraphim Fauna, Hi, Florian! I’m excited about it too, as you gathered from my ‘like’,  and I’m relieved it’ll be digital since my cassette player days are in the past. My end? Mostly getting ready to shoot Zac Farley’s and my new film and working on some fiction and counting the seconds until horrible summer is over. And you? ** Dominik, Hi!! Thanks a lot, pal. Big agree on Christopher Knowles. Thank you re: the weather. Supposedly after an awful today and especially tomorrow, the descent will begin, and it had better be the summer’s final descent, or else! No, no mind blows since the potential mother actor. But we’re looking at video auditions. Oh my god, I loved tomato soup with little alphabet dough things in it. Love is not alone in his cravings. Can one still buy that kind of soup? Must be, no? Today I just want to love to have very poor eyesight and to have forgotten his glasses and to be coincidentally carrying an AK47 and to see the summer and mistakenly think it’s Putin and assassinate it, G. ** David Ehrenstein, So, you’re secretly another woman in love? That is a reveal! Everyone, If you’re in or around LA, Mr. Ehrenstein has some bargains for you: ‘Le Berceau de Cristal (1976) by Phylippe Garrel, poster by Frederic Parso. Film with Nico and Anita Pallenberg $100.00 / ‘Raging Bull’ (1980) Wood Frame and close-up of Robert DeNiro under glass $75.00 / ‘1900’ (1976) Bernardo Bertolucci $20 // David Ehrenstein / 1462 S. Shenandoah St. #7 / Los Angeles, Ca. 90035.’ ** James Benning, Hi. First, my apologies if necessary for the follow short stretch of gush, but you’re one of the most important artists to me, a big influence on both my work and the films I make with Zac Farley, and it’s an astonishment to have you on my blog. Finding your work via a screening of ’11 x 14′ at Filmex back in the day permanently changed the way I think about making and seeing things. Thank you for everything. Secondly, thank you for the Jesse “Outlaw” Howard link. I don’t know his work, and now I will. Everyone, The very great filmmaker James Benning suggests Jesse “Outlaw” Howard’s work be added to the wordage shebang yesterday. Please investigate. Thank you again, and great respect! ** Tosh Berman, Very happy to contribute, sir. ** Sypha, Hi, James. Is that how I put it? Yeah, I still agree. I’m really sorry to hear about all the travails you’re being forced to deal with you. Your place in the blog’s heart and lexicon are ever assured, and time is a blip here. Here’s heavily hoping your family vacation will be restorative. I think they usually are, right? I loved ‘Mudmonster’ too, don’t you know. I’ve been good except for hating the summer like I always do. Yeah, Zac and I are preparing to shoot our new film, tentatively just after Xmas. Lots to figure out. And I’m working on some short fictions. Yay for your completism! Take care, pal, and I hope to see you again soon. ** _Black_Acrylic, Thank you so much again ‘in person’ for today’s splendors, Ben! Yes, the French like football so much that they even care about non-French football! ** Bill, Hi, Bill. Thanks about the heat. It’s mostly today and especially tomorrow. The plan is to hunker down today first in a big Elsa Schiaparelli exhibition and then at the Hard Rock Cafe for some nachos. And tomorrow I think I might use the ugly sky as a reason to finally go see ‘Nope’. Yes, get back to your unstable text project ASAP! My brain is growling like a stomach. And that post would be awesome too, natch. Any particularly exciting gigs? ** Brendan, Hi, B! Oh, man, you so lucky! What a lineup, good lord! Who were the most amazing, and who were the most sadly wanting? If any? This week! Cool, give me/us the heads up, master. ** Travis (fka Cal), Thank you, Trav! I’m not on Instagram, ridiculously, I know, but I’ll take a peak before they shut me out. Everyone, Go check out the work the excellent artist and etc. Travis (fka Cal) over at Instagram by clicking this.  Good, happy your mood is heading upwards and that you’re back to work. Actually just working is almost always the cure. And thanks so much about ‘God Jr.’. I really appreciate it. ** Right. _Black_Acrylic has you covered, and you’re in excellent hands, and I’ll see you again tomorrow.

Words

___________
Fiona Banner 1066, 2010
‘The default take on Fiona Banner’s work is that it’s “about” language. Given that she has made punctuation marks into glowing neons and weighty bronzes, has handwritten start-to-finish running commentaries on Hollywood blockbusters, sexually explicit films and the bodies of life models, and fashioned an ersatz alphabet from fragmented images of fighter planes, that’s not an entirely unwarranted assessment. It is, however, a partial one, obscuring the poetics and acuity of the Merseyside-born artist’s practice, whose insights arise between laterally connected points of reference. Words and how they fail us, yes, but also war, pornography and the vulnerable human body. Banner has suggested that she began making art from war films because she loved them; because she wanted to figure out why they gripped her – how they could be at once seductive and repulsive; how we could hate war, but relish these movies. The earliest war film she found fascinating was Top Gun; in 2004 she made a word-portrait of Black Hawk Down. As for 1066, it does have a beautiful aspect which is the way that one description of what is going – an arrow in the eye, a soldier felled – overlays another, words running in opposite directions evoking the headlong vectors of the tapestry; and the idea that there always two sides to each story of war.’

 

____________
Jason Rhoades Twelve-Wheel Waggon Wheel Chandelier, 2004
12 wheels, acrylic glass, cables, 48 neon phrases, fishing line, polystyrene, hot glue, carpet, various materials.

 

_____________
Micah Lexier & Derek McCormack I am the Coin (2010)
‘I AM THE COIN WAS A YEAR-LONG INSTALLATION CONSISTING OF THOUSANDS OF COINS MOUNTED DIRECTLY ON ONE WALL OF THE BMO PROJECT ROOM IN 2010.. EACH CUSTOM-MINTED COIN IS IMPRINTED WITH A SINGLE LETTER OF THE ALPHABET. WHAT AT FIRST APPEARS TO BE A RANDOM GRID OF LETTERS REVEALS ITSELF, UPON CLOSER INSPECTION, TO BE A SERIES OF WORDS AND SENTENCES UNINTERRUPTED BY SPACES OR PUNCTUATION MARKS. THE WORDS AND SENTENCES COMBINE TO TELL A STORY THAT WAS WRITTEN SPECIFICALLY FOR THIS PROJECT BY TORONTO WRITER DEREK MCCORMACK. THE BOTTOM HALF OF THE GRID SPELLS OUT THE STORY, WHICH CAN BE READ LIKE A BOOK, FROM LEFT TO RIGHT; THE TOP HALF OF THE GRID IS A MIRROR IMAGE OF THE BOTTOM. THE STORY IS ALL ABOUT COINS, THE INSTALLATION ITSELF, AND THE PEOPLE BEHIND IT.

‘THIS COMPLEX TALE IS NARRATED BY ONE OF THE COINS ON THE WALL, A SLIGHTLY MISCHIEVOUS COIN WITH A TASTE FOR PUNS, PUZZLES, CRYPTIC CONSTRAINTS, AS WELL AS ANECDOTES ABOUT REAL PEOPLE. BUT BE WARNED, THE ANECDOTES ARE NOT NECESSARILY TRUE.

‘A CLUE CONCEALED WITHIN THE STORY REVEALS THE LOCATION OF THE NARRATOR. THE FIRST ONE HUNDRED PEOPLE TO FIND THE CLUE AND IDENTIFY THE NARRATOR ON THIS WEBSITE WILL BE AWARDED A SPECIAL PRIZE.’

 

_____________
Christopher Wool Untitled, 1990
‘This work is part of a series of language-based black-and-white “word paintings” Wool began making in the late 1980s. In an effort to impose limits on his abstract compositions, he tied them to phrases of his own invention or borrowed from other, often popular sources. The lines “The cat’s in the bag. The bag’s in the river” come from the 1957 film Sweet Smell of Success, written by Ernest Lehman and Clifford Odets, where it serves as film-noir code to convey the successful execution of a scheme to bring about the downfall of one of the characters.’

 

_____________
Matt Mullican Untitled (Learning from That Person’s Work: Room 1), 2005
‘Since the 1970s Mullican has been experimenting with hypnosis to create art that both examines his subconscious, and functions as a strategy for breaking from the patterns of everyday life. Working under these hypnotically induced intoxications or psychoses, Mullican becomes his alter ego, what he refers to as that person—an ageless, genderless being that inhabits his physical body. That person’s reality is documented through a series of performances wherein he draws, counts, and writes with ink on large sheets of easel paper (as seen in the video below). The finished drawings are attached to queen-sized bed sheets in a grid-like pattern, and hung through a maze of installation rooms that acts as a diagram of that person’s reality (or, arguably, of Mullican’s subconscious).’

 

____________
Yi Xin Tong Fishermen’s Words, 2018
‘Gravesend-based Yi Xin Tong identifies as an artist first and as a fisherman second. But it’s a close second.’

 

____________
Edward Ruscha Pay Nothing Until April, 2003
‘In Pay or Pay Nothing Until April, Ruscha has used a mountain landscape and an advertising slogan painted in a clean modern font. Ruscha lives in Los Angeles and the city and its film industry is important in his work. The mountains he uses in his works have the spectacular and slightly unreal look of a film backdrop. By mixing awe-inspiring natural imagery with banal, consumerist text without any clear style, Ruscha’s painting reflects the city in which he lives, a place he once referred to as ‘the ultimate cardboard cut-out town’.’

 

____________
Richard Prince Joke Paintings, 1992 – 1999
‘Beginning in 1984, Richard Prince began assembling one-line gag cartoons and ‘borscht belt’ jokes from the 1950s which he redrew onto small pieces of paper. ‘Artists were casting sculptures in bronze, making huge paintings, talking about prices and clothes and cars and spending vast amounts of money. So I wrote jokes on little pieces of paper and sold them for $10 each’. Following the hand-written jokes and subsequent works in which cartoon images were silkscreened onto canvas, in 1987 Prince adopted a more radical, formulaic strategy of mechanically reproducing classic one liners and gags onto a flat monochrome canvas.’

 

_____________
Ray Johnson Rejected cover design for Arthur Rimbaud’s Illuminations, 1957
‘Ray founded the New York Correspondence School with the first mailings being sent as far back as 1958. Ray was the center and primary proponent of the ‘school,’ mailing mimeographed letters, drawings (often of bunnies), instructions and collage. Text-wise, the work offered 4 primary challenges to the traditional studio/gallery/viewer formulation: Subverted the notion of high or low brow by simply ignoring the world in which those notions held sway. Changed the traditional artist-viewer relationship, offering original work to be viewed expressly in the home in what amounted to a 1:1 setting. Moved past the question as to whether or not language could be trusted. Johnson rendered it moot by mailing the work. If the Post Office could be trusted to deliver the work to the address on the envelope, how could you not ‘trust’ the work inside to be faithful to the same basic notions of language? It could not be reviewed…’

 

__________________
William Burroughs Untitled, 1959
‘It’s a literary technique, but crazy influential as certain folks began to reconsider (again) how we understand the basics of our written language, looking instead to break down structural assumptions in order to find hidden meaning or, according to Burroughs, with potential for divining the future.’

 

______________
Carey Young Declared Void, 2005
Vinyl drawing and text, dimensions variable

 

______________
Carl Andre Untitled, 1963
Typed carbon paper transfer on paper

 

_______________
John Waters Various, 1991 – 2006
‘You could just ask yourself, as Waters does in the essay “Roommates” in his 2010 book Role Models, “Isn’t art supposed to transpose even the most banal detail of our lives?”’

 

_______________
Ben Anderson DFYVVM, 2017
Acrylic on faux marble

 

_______________
Ad Reinhardt How to Look at …, 1946
‘These cartoons, neatly conjoining reproduced and hand-drawn line, pedagogically engage with exactly the problems Reinhardt was working out elsewhere and earlier on the sketchbook page and in actual lines of charcoal, ink, gouache, and glued paper. At the same time, they evince the artist’s impulse to both mine and undermine the burgeoning power of New York’s art institutions. (The Museum of Modern Art had opened in 1929, the Whitney Museum of American Art in 1931, and the Museum of Non-objective Painting—now the Guggenheim—in 1939.) The cartoons’ conflation of line and lineage, “actual activity” and critical engagement of institution and context, mirrors the artist’s multifaceted praxis as a whole. Reinhardt was keenly aware of what was and was not on view “about town”; he not only reviewed shows for publications including New Masses and PM but picketed museums and wrote pamphlets and letters to the editor about exhibition policies.’

 

_____________
Larry Johnson Various, 1982 – 1991
‘Johnson’s art is highly formalized. Although he almost always uses photography, he does not consider himself a photographer. He follows a tradition of conceptual photography in which artists use photography for purposes other than capturing a decisive moment. Johnson works with text and images in various combinations invoking the parallel worlds of design and American popular culture.’


Untitled (A Quiet Life), 1990


Untitled (Movie Stars on Clouds), 1982/84


Untitled (Classically Tragic Story), 1991


Untitled (I Hated that About You), 1987


Untitled (Ghost Story for Courtney Love), 1992

 

_______________
Goran Trbuljak old and bald I search for a gallery, 1982
‘The New Art Practice in the 1970s were mostly going on outside exhibition spaces, in galleries that were part of the student cultural centers, but occasionally also in certain state galleries which presented in their programs the local and international avant-garde scene, like the Gallery of Contemporary Art in Zagreb. In 1971, in the gallery of the Student Cultural Centre in Zagreb, Trbuljak exposed only a poster on which it was written, “I do not want to show anything new and original”.’

 

______________
Marcel Broodthaers L’Art et les mots, 1973
‘Although they may seem arbitrary, everything in those paintings has been carefully studied, from the typography to the kind of printing. The elegance and style of the typography frequently connote the tradition of high culture and its concern with execution and expression. He combines them in his literary paintings with an industrial element, mechanical reproduction, and they are his ironic response to the successive fashions of minimalism and conceptual art, while opening the way for a kind of visual expression which, without necessarily being poetry or painting, is both at the same time. They take to extremes the peintures-poèmes of Joan Miró and, most of all, the work of René Magritte (another Belgian, who had a deep influence on him).’

 

_____________
Kay Rosen Various, 1991 – 2021
‘Kay Rosen is a master of the text-based art medium. She’s figured out how to meld the visual and the verbal into an ideal gallery experience. Using only words in block letters, her work is easy to read, yet beautiful to look at, delivering a mental punch that resonates long after her language is consumed. Specific enough to deliver a message, yet at the same time open enough to invite multiple interpretations. Rosen’s practice is masterfully tuned into the desire of the art viewer.’

 

_____________
Shirin Neshat Zahra, 2008
C-print and ink

 

_____________
John McQueen Bird Brain, 2002
‘On close inspection, the names of various birds are legible.’

 

______________
Camilio Rojas Flavor, 2011
‘This piece was created using over 3,400 cigarettes that spell the word flavor. The cigarettes are half smoked showing the nicotine in them.’

 

_____________
Christopher Knowles Typings, 1981 – 1996
‘For a person with autism, like the artist Christopher Knowles, the world outside can be so noisy, so busy, so full of information that it becomes overwhelming and, sometimes, terrifying. Knowles’s response to the frenzied world around him is to construct islands of visual and auditory play in its midst. In his art—spanning text, sound, painting, sculpture, and performance—concrete facts, numbers, and patterns are basic elements that not only ground him in the world, but are a source of delight. His work can be disconcerting and strange, but is so imbued with Knowles’s ebullient energy that it’s always enchanting—and fun.’

 

_____________
Rhys Ziemba Frank Zappa Quotation, 2008
Acrylic and vinyl lettering on found artwork

 

_____________
Tom Phillips Humument Fragment, 2005
‘In 1966, at age twenty-nine, Tom Phillips began his Humument project, the “treatment” of the 1892 novel A Human Document, by the Victorian author William Hurrell Mallock. The first artist’s book that resulted was initially published in 1973 and has now gone through five editions; Phillips began a second version in 1980 and continues to work on it to this day. To create these treatments, the artist removed each page from Mallock’s novel and subjected it to playful editing, surgically removing blocks of text to form an Apollinaire-like shaped poem—or, rather, a Mallarmé-like throw of the verbal dice. Sometimes Phillips’s treated pages borrow from pop-culture imagery, sometimes old photographs are used, and sometimes figures are painted on the page. Each page has been worked and reworked, yet it all looks random and informal, as though Phillips had a divining rod that suddenly found the “right words” or else had been spooked by some hidden, subliminal meaning. In either case, a kind of alchemical distillation has taken place, with the lead of Mallock’s heavy prose quintessentialized into lyrical golden drops.’

 

_____________
Jenny Holzer Various, 1989 – 2020
‘Since the 1970s, Jenny Holzer has inserted language into public settings as part of her singular conceptual practice. Her installations—which have taken the form of billboards, projections, park benches, condom wrappers, and electronic signs—feature texts which range from enigmatic, koan-like phrases such as “Abuse of power comes as no surprise” to longer, more involved screeds.’

 

_____________
Richard Hamilton Swingeing London 67, 1968
‘Hamilton’s art dealer, Robert Fraser, and members of the rock group the Rolling Stones were arrested in 1967 by the London police for drug possession. The following year, Hamilton published several prints about the press coverage of the events. Swingeing London 67 is an assemblage of clippings compiled by Fraser’s gallery and laid out to mimic the composition of a page of newsprint. He selected headlines that focused on trivial details, such as the men’s meals, cars, and clothing, rather than on the court proceedings and sentences. Pieces of wrapping paper from an incense packet that appear between the cuttings reference the incense sticks that authorities encountered during 
their raid and alleged were meant to disguise the smell of cannabis.’

 

_____________
Betty Tompkins Various, 2018
‘The artist has literally ripped out the pages of the art-historical canon, altering its images with very contemporary language about women, power, and guilt.’

 

_____________
Zhang Dali Slogan No. 6,’Strengthen the construction of moral thought’, 2007
‘Zhang uses a particular technique of text and image juxtaposition to engage with the civic political slogans that were plastered on the streets of Beijing on the eve of the 2008 Olympic Games.’

 

_____________
Bruce Nauman Eat Death, 1972
Yellow (Eat) glass tubing superimposed on blue (Death) tubing with glass tubing suspension frame

 

_____________
Roni Horn Dickinson Stayed Home, 1992-1993
‘Emily Dickinson is a pivotal figure for Roni Horn, while also a figure of empathy. Born in 1830 in New England, Dickinson wrote some 1800 poems. But she preferred not to publish them, lived as a recluse in her bedroom, and restricted her social life to her Homestead. Her involvement with the world occurred through the books in her father’s library and her abundant correspondence. American feminist criticism, which blossomed in the early 1990s, returned to the question of Dickinson’s poetry and the normative image of her as a “recluse”, reassessing her chosen solitude as a requirement for her creativity and the fundamental condition for her freedom. Roni Horn, who takes the stand of being “before gender”, “neutralises” Dickinson. As a figure with whom Horn identifies, the poet and her poetry are an integral part of Horn’s quest for a centre.’

 

_____________
Dan Graham Rock My Religion, 1982-84
Rock My Religion is a thesis on the relation between religion and rock music in contemporary culture. Graham formulates a history that begins with the Shakers, an early religious community who practiced self-denial and ecstatic trance dances. With the “reeling and rocking” of religious revivals as his point of departure, Graham analyzes the emergence of rock music as religion with the teenage consumer in the isolated suburban milieu of the 1950s, locating rock’s sexual and ideological context in post-World War II America. The music and philosophies of Patti Smith, who made explicit the trope that rock is religion, are his focus. This complex collage of text, film footage and performance forms a compelling theoretical essay on the ideological codes and historical contexts that inform the cultural phenomenon of rock `n’ roll music.’

 

_____________
John Baldessari Various, 1966 – 1968
‘In the late 1960s Baldessari neglected painting and started to use words as a compositional element as images. ‘A word can’t substitute for an image, but is equal to it’, explained the artist in an interview with Hans Ulrich Obrist and stated further: ‘You can build with words just like you can build with imagery.’ He began to create artworks with pure painted text on canvas and emulsions of photo and text. From 1966 to 1968 Baldessari produced a series of text-paintings consisting of statements about art and its concept. He displayed quotations from known art critics and used formulaic instructions or definitions and comments from art manuals. Thereby the artist transformed the influence of art theory and critics on artworks to the motif of his conceptual text-paintings.[5] As an artist of the conceptual art movement Baldessari’s aim was to produce art without using the conventional art praxis.’

 

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** Dominik, Hi!!! Guess what, our temperature starts climbing into the gross realm again starting tomorrow. One last (hopefully) sweat pot of a Paris. Yeah, the casting part of making a film is maybe the most exciting, certainly the most important. Maybe especially to a fiction writer like me since my fictional characters never grow surfaces (and I like it that way). Happily slightly belated birthday to Anita! Ha ha, that’s some mom love has there. Explains a lot. Love realising that what we call syntax is what words themselves call an orgy, G. ** David Ehrenstein, I don’t know ‘La Chair de l’Orchidée’, but soon I will. ** Travis (fka Cal), Hi! Oh, no, I’m sorry you had to go through the Covid ordeal. Ah, you are Cal or, rather, were ‘Cal’. Travis certainly works. Two syllables, strong on the first one, nice vowel sound combination. I’m hoping and trusting that your feeling of defeat is some last bit of mindfucking exhaust from your Covid bout. Your talent has always jumped into my brain full-fledged. It’s really nice to have you back. ** _Black_Acrylic, ‘ À l’intérieur’ is the Satan of scissors films. I saw on the news that Leeds won yesterday. Assuming that’s a plus in your world, congrats. ** Russ Healy, Oh, man, is there stuff you can or do take to make the arthritis take long naps? Thank you very much about ‘I Wished’. Yeah, I’m a big sentence fetishist. When I’m writing I think about the sentences more than anything else, I think. And when I read, same deal. And when I read a writer whose sentences seem too amazing to have even been possible — Foster-Wallace and Lutz being great examples — it’s like nerd LSD. And thank about ‘PGL’. Zac and Are super exciting and jonesing to make the new one. Have best day humanly possible. ** trees, Ted! Old buddy! Mega-maestro! You know, I’ve never seen ‘Exorcist 3’, and clearly that’s a gaping gap. That I will plug with it as soon as I find ‘E3’. Which shouldn’t be too hard? I’m well, and you? Love from Paris meeting and greeting your Philly love midair. ** Steve Erickson, Hi. Well, we’re looking at initial audition tapes now. When we get to LA, we’ll meet in person with the most promising folks and have them do a little line reading but mostly just hang out and talk with them casually and observe them. Theoretically we’re open to pretty much anyone with any background or lack thereof. The first person we cast for ‘Room Temperature’ about six months ago is a young French guy who starred in a Michel Gondry film when he was 14, but he’s against conventional acting. So he has experience being filmed, which is very helpful, but has no acting tics we’ll have to erode. There are three people who we’re seriously interested interested in right now, and two of them are visual artists, and one of them is a 12 year old boy with no acting experience. So anything is possible. Mm, hm, I don’t remember where that list came from. I must have done a general google search re: films/scissors and ended up seeing a link. The Chills! You keep listening to bands I haven’t thought about in ages and would like to think about (and hear) again. I hate those delays. I managed to sneak into Criterion Channel over here through a VPN, but the connection is so sluggish for some reason that it’s almost useless. ** Misanthrope, Howdy, G! Up? This and that and the other thing, thanks. Argh about the impending extra work. How do you prepare for that, or will just leap into it blind? ** Robert, Hi! Oh, thanks a lot. Sounds nice. I live about two blocks from the Tuileries-Concorde-Champs Elysee corridor where the supersonic jets do their flyover on Bastille Day. I cant see them from my window, other than their reflection in a neighbor’s window, but the sound is immense and borderline apocalyptic earthquake-like. I think you’d like it. I hope your week has begun inimitably. ** Right. You get artistically employed wordage today. See you tomorrow.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 DC's

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑