DC's

The blog of author Dennis Cooper

Page 754 of 1102

Varioso #25: Satan’s God, Marías, Bachelot/Caron, Q-Literary Museum, Mauss, Hengel , Strauss, Bonello, Superplexus, Tomita, Brainard, I cannot go to sleep, Brothers, Russell, Talkowski, Sala, Mik, Rising Sun Anger Release Bar, cotton candy, Allen/Rohmer, Nishino, Padgett, Joyland *

* (restored)

______________

Satan’s God

 

_____________

‘This is a 57-page long novella about Elvis Presley shooting the film Fun in Acapulco in Mexico. A translator is hired to ensure that Elvis pronounces his few handful of Spanish lines in a proper Castillian accent. But when a drunk American and Elvis insult the local “white mafia” leader, and a translation is necessary, the protagonist soon finds himself on the hunted. The story is kind of Marías-lite, but the opening sentence is a typical sinewy sentence from one of Spain’s greatest living writers.’ — Peter McLachlin, TERITW

No one knows what it is to be hunted down without having lived it, and unless the chase was active and constant, carried out with deliberation, determination, dedication and never a break, with perseverance and fanaticism, as if the pursuers had nothing else to do in life but look for you, keep after you, follow your trail, locate you, catch up with you and then, at best, wait for the moment to settle the score. It isn’t that someone has it in for you and stands at the ready to pounce should you cross his path or give him the chance; it isn’t that someone has sworn revenge and waits, waits, does no more than wait and therefore remains passive, or schemes in preparation for his blows, which as long as they’re machinations cannot be blows, we think the blows will fall but they may not, the enemy may drop dead of a heart attack before he sets to work in earnest, before he truly applies himself to harming us, destroying us. Or he may forget, calm down, something may distract him and he may forget, and if we don’t happen to cross his path again we may be able to get away; vengeance is extremely wearying and hatred tends to evaporate, it’s a fragile, ephemeral feeling, impermanent, fleeting, so difficult to maintain that it quickly gives way to rancor or resentment which are more bearable, easier to retrieve, much less virulent and somehow less pressing, while hatred is always in a tearing hurry, always urgent: I want him now, I want him dead, bring me the son of a bitch’s head, I want to see him flayed and his body smeared with tar and feathers, a carcass, skinned and butchered, and then he will be no one and this hatred that is exhausting me will end. (cont.)

 

_____________

Bachelot/Caron

 

_______________

Myrian Solar’s Q-Literary Museum is a multidisciplinary webmuseum of immaterial Literature that brings together the geometric, chemical and quantum physical aspects of parallel worlds. With a literary and curatorial audio-visual programming of its contents it invites the visitor to make a trip by the space-time through texts of representation that turn their collections into unique in the present literary panorama. The museum is organized like a fractal with different nodes for the diffusion of a new literary thematic one and for the informal learning that is complemented with a bilingual educative program and an interactive platform of thematic research open to the contribution of the users, at the same time as it provides resources for the researchers in experimental Literature.’ — archimuse.com

 

_______________

‘For his ongoing series begun in 2003 and titled “ONS” (short for one-night stand), artist Jan-Holger Mauss collects black-and-white images from post-1945 gay porn magazines. Using a special eraser, he then delicately effaces the nude model on each page while leaving the background. The result is a scene emptied of figures, with traces of an intervention detected in vaguely metamorphosing organic forms emerging from rockscapes and waterfalls, or as halations appearing among props or furniture.’ — Art in America

 

_______________

‘Sam Hengel drew crude sketches depicting scenes of violence and warfare, but police say none of them help explain why the 15-year-old held his high school classmates hostage at gunpoint for six hours on Nov. 29 before fatally shooting himself when a SWAT team swarmed the classroom. The police report included an undated drawing with Hengel’s name on it. The sketch showed a helicopter dropping a bomb on a square labeled ‘city’ while a stick figure on the ground fires a grenade at the bomb. Bullets from the helicopter split another figure in half, and a paratrooper fires into trees. Elsewhere one stick figure pushes another off a steep hill. Skorik told AP he didn’t think there was any link between the drawing and the hostage incident.’ — Kansas City Star

 

_______________

‘Journalist Neil Strauss, who has coauthored books with the band members of Mötley Crüe (The Dirt) and porn superstar Jenna Jameson (How to Make Love Like a Porn Star) now offers a terrific look at the dysfunctional livelihoods of stardom, a theme based on his many interviews for various publications. Strauss went back to his original interview tapes and notes in search of moments—mostly unpublished—that reveal “the truth or essence of each person, story, or experience.”‘ — PW

1. Courtney Love

The Scene: Courtney Love’s house in Los Angeles. The time is very late. The moment is when she leaps off her bed and suddenly says…

Courtney Love: Say hi to Kurt …

[She walks to a dresser, pulls open a drawer, and removes a square-shaped tin. She removes the lid, revealing a plastic bag full of white ashes. A faint smell of jasmine emanates from the tin.]

Too bad you don’t do coke. Otherwise I’d suggest taking a metal straw to it.

2. Snoop Dogg

The Scene: Snoop Dogg’s home outside Los Angeles, shortly after the murders of Tupac and Biggie Smalls—and just after Snoop left Death Row Records.

Snoop Dogg: I want you to hear a few songs first.

[Presses PLAY on a DAT machine, and leaves the room while 13 songs he’s just finished recording blare from the studio speakers. As soon as the last song ends, he bursts back through the door.]

Well, did you tape some of it?

Of course not.

You should have.

What?!

Didn’t we talk yesterday about taping pieces of the album and leaking them on the Internet?

Yeah, but most rappers try to avoid leaking their music, because then no one will buy it when it comes out.

Fuck it, just bootleg that motherfucker. Come on, man. I’ll give you the ones you want.

[He plays three songs, and watches diligently to make sure I record them.]

Cool. Can we use your wheels? I gotta go get Pampers.

3. Chuck Berry

The Scene: Sitting in the St. Louis restaurant and club Blueberry Hill, Berry, known for avoiding reporters, has his longest interview in decades. At the end, he suggests staying in touch via telephone and fax, then suddenly grows concerned.

Berry: Yeah, let me ask one question. Don’t laugh at this because it’s not laughable, and I’m not . . . Yes, I am serious. You’re not funny, are you?

No, I’m not.

Well, that’s what I want to hear. I mean, I’ve talked to funny guys. Like do you know Little Richard?

Not personally.

Anyway, he’s for real. I know because I’ve been asked for . . . He came on to me once, you know. And it just doesn’t make sense. I couldn’t believe it! And he believes it. By that, I mean he doesn’t deny it. Anyway, when I ask you that, it’s only because you said, “We’ll talk,” you know …

Everyone Loves You When You’re Dead

 

_______________

‘Filmmaker Bertrand Bonello crafted something extraordinary with his short Cindy: The Doll Is Mine, an ode to three of my favorite things: Asia Argento, Blonde Redhead and, especially, Cindy Sherman. As Sherman, Argento plays the dual role of the artist and the model. As the artist, her hair’s cropped short, and she wears a loose, button-down shirt; as the model, she dons a blonde wig and a dress better suited for a poupée. As Cindy the artist arranges Cindy the model around the room, nowhere seems appropriate for what she’s looking for. At one point Cindy the artist asks Cindy the model to stand more feminine, more curvy and seductive. However, it turns out that what’s missing are tears, which Cindy the artist asks, very reluctantly, of her model. Aside from the specifics of the artist though, Cindy: The Doll Is Mine is like an abridged version of Catherine Breillat’s Sex Is Comedy, both fascinating looks into the strife in the process of creating art.’ — Fin de Cinema

 

____________

 

______________

‘A lifelong fisherman who studied ichthyology as an undergrad, the Japanese artist Iori Tomita uses marine life he receives from fellow fishermen to create what he calls New World Transparent Specimens—sea creatures that have been transformed into DayGlo shells of their former selves. He first saw a sample of a fish that had been turned transparent at a university lecture six years ago, and since then he has used the same preservation technique to make thousands of hypercolored cadavers, which he sells at the Tokyu Hands department store.

‘To produce the specimens, Tomita first removes the scales and skin of fish that have been preserved in formaldehyde. Next he soaks the creatures in a stain that dyes the cartilage blue. Tomita uses a digestive enzyme called trypsin, along with a host of other chemicals, to break down the proteins and muscles, halting the process just at the moment they become transparent but before they lose their form. The bones are then stained with red dye, and the brilliant beast is preserved in a jar of glycerin. The extensive production takes five months to a year.’ — Wired

 

______________

Art

Looking through a book of drawings by Holbein I realize several moments of truth. A nose (a line) so nose-like. So line-like. And then I think to myself ‘so what?’ It’s not going to solve any of my problems. And then I realize that at the very moment of appreciation I had no problems. Then I decide this is a pretty profound thought. And that I ought to write it down. This is what I have just done. But it doesn’t sound so profound anymore. That’s art for you.

 

A Sign of the Times

‘A sign of the times’ are posters plastered up all over West Broadway announcing a new magazine called ‘No Magazine’. (Can hardly wait for the first issue!) Seriously though — and aside from finding it all a bit silly — it’s kind of sweet too — don’t you think? — that we can care so much, as to try so hard, irregardless of…but then why bother?

 

Poem

Sometimes

everything

seems

so

oh, I don’t know.

 

Imaginary Still Life No. 5

I close my eyes. I see a charming nosegay of violets in an ordinary drinking glass. That’s all.

 

1970

1970

is a good year

if for no other reason

than just because

I’m tired of complaining.

 

Joe Brainard

 

______________

I can’t go to sleep

 

______________

‘Laura Brothers (b. 1982) resides in the forested portion of New York State. Her work is born-on and bound-to the computer. Its primary venue is the internet, a space where one may wade through a sea of cultural referents to ultimately reach a false sense of nostalgia. Although her work has been referred to as “digital hallucinations,” she parallels her imagery to re-polished pop songs under the guise of ephemeral landscapes.’ — transmodernfestival.org

Laura Brothers

 

______________

‘Ken Russell’s In Search of the English Folksong, was actually made in 1997, making Ken bizarrely ahead of the pack — just him and the dude in Current 93 at that point, eh? No ancient footage from mid-Sixties folk cellars like Les Cousins and Bunjie’s, or Communist Party singalongs from the Fifties… instead it’s the performers as they are now (well, ’97, but you catch my drift) … June Tabor doing a wonderfully haunting unaccompanied story-song “The King of Rome” in the grounds of a stately home, the Albion Band marred a bit by some nasty modern keyboards, Carthy/Waterson harmonising in a graveyard, Donovan singing “Nirvana”, Fairport Convention doing a sort of video I guess and cavorting around a thatched cottage, the Cropedy Festival (including Osibisa!)…. and then lots of stuff that doesn’t fit at all (this being a wonderfully eccentric take on what constitutes folk song, goofily presented by the ruddy-faced Russell).’ — Simon Reynolds

 

______________

Steve Talkowski

 

______________

A History of White People

white people were paid well

not to witness

the fact that they were white

you know the theory

white isn’t a color

but color’s unlimited absence

white goes with anything

that’s why it seemed fair that white people

conquered the world

they were the real invisible men

cause they could perch on top of a country

and say they weren’t there

they could move through its neighborhoods

like mysterious aliens

with this difference:

in ufological lore

aliens often infiltrate a world

without its inhabitants knowing about it

but when white people invaded

everyone could see them

but themselves

 

The Martyrs

last night we rented a documentary

on the life of Jean Seberg

that pointed out the parallels

in her artistic career

with Vanessa Redgrave and Jane Fonda

later

a PBS special

on the life of Liz Taylor

followed by an episode of Biography

on the career of Jack Lemmon

unseen narrators

told the tales of these lives

in the form of voice-overs

behind stills and film clips

we were led to believe these stars

were representative

that they ventriloquized

our own concerns

that they were stand-ins

for democracy

each

we were told

suffered greatly

 

Jerome Sala

 

______________

Aernout Mik

 

______________

‘If using restaurant staff as punching bags sounds like a good anger management tactic to you, check out the Rising Sun Anger Release Bar and Restaurant in Nanjing City, China where customers pay a fee to beat up staff, scream and break glasses. The staff, which dons protective gear, will dress up to resemble the person you’d really like to physically assault. The bar is said to be especially popular with Chinese women who work in the service industry.’ — Sydney Morning Herald

 

______________

‘Cotton candy was first recorded around the 1900’s. At that time, spun sugar was an expensive, labor-intensive endeavor and was not generally available to the average person. Machine-spun cotton candy was invented in 1897 by William Morrison and John C. Wharton and first introduced to a wide audience at the 1904 World’s Fair as “Fairy Floss” with great success, selling 68,655 boxes at the then-high 25¢, half the cost of admission to the fair. Fairy floss was renamed to “cotton candy” in the 1920s. Typical machines used to make cotton candy include a spinning head enclosing a small “sugar reserve” bowl into which a charge of granulated, colored sugar (or separate sugar and food coloring) is poured. Heaters near the rim of the head melt the sugar, which is squeezed out through tiny holes by centrifugal force. Precolored sugar packaged specially for the process is milled with melting characteristics and a crystal size optimized for the head and heated holes. The molten sugar solidifies in the air and is caught in a larger bowl which totally surrounds the spinning head. Left to operate for a period, the cottonlike product builds up on the inside walls of the larger bowl, at which point the machine operator twirls a stick, cone, or their hands around the rim of the large catching bowl, gathering the sugar strands into portions which are served on stick or cone, or in plastic bags.’ — rainbowcottoncandy.com

 

_____________

‘comme on le sait pas de cheval, pas de chevalier. mais ce qui passe quand le chevalier n’a pas de château? il simplement chevauche.’

UN RÉDUCTION DE PERCEVAL LE GALLOIS

 

_____________

Sohei Nishino’s extraordinary photographic dioramas, monumental in size, map out the artist’s personal impressions of the world’s major cities in several thousand intimate details. Nishino’s collages are not precise geographic recreations, but an imperfect mix of landmarks and iconic features conceived from his personal ‘re-experiencing’ of a city.

‘When photographing a city, Nishino walks the entire city on foot for a month, wandering the streets and recording from every possible angle. In total he uses over 300 rolls of black and white film and took over 10,000 pictures. In the following three months Nishino selects some 4,000 of these photographs, hand printed in his own dark room, which he then meticulously pieces together with scissors and glue in his Tokyo studio. The result was an aerial view of the city, which was then reshot as a completed collage to produce a final image in photographic form.

‘This lengthy and painstaking process, all done by hand, only allows for the creation of three maps per year. Nishino’s re-imagination of a city presents a convincing record despite its geographical inaccuracies, a map embodying the intricacies of a city through the eyes and recollection of an outsider.’ — Art Daily


San Francisco


Amsterdam


Berlin


London


Paris

 

______________

Bargain Hunt

Suppose you found a bargain so incredible
you stood there stunned for a moment
unable to believe that this thing could be
for sale at such a low price: that is what happens
when you are born, and as the years go by
the price goes up and up until, near the end
of your life, it is so high that you lie there
stunned forever.

 

Bluebird

You can’t expect
the milk to be delivered
to your house
by a bluebird
from the picture book
you looked at
at the age of four:
he’s much older
now, can’t carry those
bottles ‘neath his wing,
can hardly even carry a tune
with his faded beak
that opens some nights
to leak out a cry
to the horrible god
that created him.

Don’t think I’m
the bluebird, or that
you are. Let him get
old on his own and
die like a real bluebird
that sat on a branch
in a book, turned his head
toward you, and radiated.

 

Ron Padgett

 

_____________

 

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** David Ehrenstein, Yes, indeed. I believe your book is how I originally discovered his films if I’m not mistaken. ** Keaton, Whoa, Mr. K! Wait, you’re coming to Paris? Should we not shatter the glass wall and have a coffee at the very least? How about it? Give me a poke or shout or something if you’d like to. No protests of late, but we’re always on the cusp. Some art around, yeah, it’s true. Hit me up. Ha ha, thank you for the gift. That’s so obviously ripped off from PGL. I think we have a case. I’ll get out lawyers on it stat. ** Corey Heiferman, Seems possible they’d have Owen Land over there on VHS, if his stuff was ever on VHS. Okay, sorry, I clearly was cloudy and jumping to the wrong conclusions, but I think I understand now. Ah, well, my half-kidding about interns was tonally off. Nice. That there are recruitables. Uh, I’m not classically a note taker. I keep a calendar/agenda to remind me what I’m locked into doing and when and remember what I did and when. And I carry a little notebook and pen everywhere in case I get a good idea or see or hear something I want to coopt. But not, like, notes on what I’ve read or seen anything. My memory’s pretty good and detailed for some weird reason. So far. ** Steve Erickson, You’re probably right. I keep waiting for the France outbreak since it’s tearing around in northern Italy, but so far we just have scattered sickos. ** _Black_Acrylic, Yeah, he seems like he was very enigmatic. Which, as you said, is a good thing. At least from this afar. Your friend’s MRI things are very cool. If I wore extras, I’d order something. ** Jeff J, Hi, Jeff. I saw I guess on FB that you’re showing a Land film the other day, but the timing was coincidental since that post has been locked in place for weeks. What an amazing line-up there, needless to say. Land/Brakhage/Sharits = wow. If I were at all nearby, I would be there lickety-split. How amazing if the crowd gets into your program. That would be so heartening and inspiring to hear. Let me know. Me? Sending off the materials and instructions for my new GIF novel to Kiddiepunk today, so I’ve been finishing that. New film grant applying and fundraising and trying to figure out wealthy people to hit up for donations. The TV series is on serious life support. Extremely long story very short, the powers that be really like Episodes 1 and 3, which are the ones we went furthest re: normalising, and they hate Episode 2, which is our favorite and the one we’ve doggedly tried to protect. So a big meeting soon to find out if we’re willing to normalise it, and to what extent we would need to normalise it, or not. If we don’t, the series is dead. It’s very fucked. So we’re in this dilemma re: do we surrender? And they have over a barrel since we’ve been working on this for five years and really don’t want to have wasted all that work and time — the next option would be turning it into a feature film which would mean hugely more work, again totally on spec, which Zac and I really, really don’t want to do — while really not wanting to give up. It’s just misery central 24/7/365 with that fucking project. Otherwise, all is okay. Dying to get my new novel a US home and hoping that’ll be decided and over ASAP. How are you? New novel work? Or other things? ** Okay. Today I resurrect another one of the old Varioso posts consisting of things that interested me but not enough to devote an entire post to them, and there’s a lot of cool stuff up there if you’re willing to scroll around and dig in. I hope you will. See you tomorrow.

Owen Land Day

 

‘Owen Land, formerly known as George Landow, was a really really great filmmaker. His films are like no others. I first saw Landow’s early standard-8mm films (which may be no longer extant — is that right?) such as Are Era and Not a Case of Lateral Displacement at an open screening in New York in the summer of 1964 or 1965. Open screenings, even back then, tended to have many films that weren’t so interesting. Landow’s not only engaged me, but seemed both great, and unlike anything I had seen before. One seemed to be long takes of a wound. Are Era was shot off TV, very rapidly cut (in camera I assume), showing a TV head both right side up and upside down. Still in my teens, I had only recently discovered cinema, and had never heard of Landow before that screening. “Structural film” had not yet been so named, so the statement from the gallery that Land’s “debut” was a “critique of structural film” is not right, as a “genre” that has not yet been named is not exactly ready for its “critique.”

‘It’s true that Land was not the most sociably adept of people. But one would not expect that from his films. If you understand his films, you understand that communication in them is always paradoxical. His fascination with palindromes (and he and I exchanged a few ordinal palindromes at times) was only a bare surface indication of his films’ profound inwardness, an inwardness that was not one of psychological interiority, as in Brakhage, but of irreconcilable paradox. Land was fascinated with cinema’s artificiality, and his use of film imagery was profoundly hermetic; it always feels as if his film images are spiraling inward, collapsing in on themselves.

‘He was not necessarily the friendliest instructor for young filmmakers interested in “self-expression.” He wasn’t very patient with long, self-indulgent, emotionally-laden “personal” films. I once saw him advise a student, correctly in my view, that the student did not have the distance needed to deal with the family footage he was trying to fashion into a film. But those who so easily make personal voiceover pieces today (in which a voiceover narrates autobiographical details on the sound track which the images illustrate) might have something to learn from really studying Landow’s deeply hermetic art, an art I find true in some deep way to the truths of images either on film or seen with the eye: Do we really know what any image might mean, or how it might “feel”?

‘There is much humor in Land’s work, and one genuine belly-laugh for those who had had their fill of the academic use of Hollis Frampton’s (admittedly wonderful) (nostalgia) to illustrate “structural” film: The film within Land’s Wide Angle Saxon titled Regrettable Redding Condescension, credited to someone named “Al Rutcurts” (remember Land’s love of palindromes), which was indeed a “critique” of “structural film.”

‘I wish “experimental” cinema had more true originals such as Land, filmmakers who find a new and original use for cinema, a new type of film grammar, which, of course, can also lead to a new type of thinking. In my view, the “project” of “experimental” film at its best has always been that of forging new types of consciousness, new was of conceiving of the world, new ways of being in the world.’ — Fred Camper

 

___
Stills















































 

_____
Further

Owen Land @ IMDb
‘Owen Land (1944-2011)’ @ LUX
The Films of Owen Land @ Harvard Film Archive
Owen Land @ Office Baroque Gallery
Book: Mark Webber ‘Two Films by Owen Land’
Owen Land @ mubi
‘Avant-gardist Owen Land Comes Out of the Shadows’

 

________
Documentary

‘“So, how’s that avant-garde film you’re working on going?” Hopefully, that question will be met with a fun, answer like “Oh great, it’s a really interesting project.” However, director Ben Lazarus has documented the resentful feelings of the disgruntled crew who worked on Owen Land‘s Dialogues, which was filmed in Los Angeles. In the Land of Owen, which features footage not in the original film, is a documentary of the aftermath of a film production gone haywire. Word of warning: This video is NSFW as it contains lots of nudity.

‘There is no actual footage of Land directing in In the Land of Owen. There are a couple of still pictures of him where he doesn’t look very well and some of the interviewees talk about him being ill and having had a stroke. But without actual footage of him directing and no direct interview with him, it’s tough to determine exactly how the production of Dialogues descended into complete chaos.

‘Many of the crew members and actors refer to Land as if he was a tyrannical crank on set, including being verbally abusive, but details of the abuse are not given. Some crew members are still incredibly hostile and bitter, while others kind of laugh off the flakier aspects of Land’s personality and behavior. One shocking revelation is that the first director of photography on the film has withheld over half of the footage shot of Dialogues due to non-payment.

‘One recurring topic of the documentary is that everyone on the crew was not only completely baffled by what Land was shooting, but that was a source of frustration. I don’t know if that’s because this was an L.A. crew or if the crew just generally wasn’t into avant-garde and underground filmmaking. The clips that were withheld from Dialogues and that appear in this documentary make it look like a fun film. And I totally don’t agree with the one actor’s assessment that making a film “irritating” is a goal of a lot of experimental filmmakers. That sounds like the reaction of somebody who just expects all films to have clear narratives.

‘There aren’t many “making of” documentaries about avant-garde films. Hearing about the tribulations of making Dialogues in In the Land of Owen is really pretty fascinating; and it’s a very well put together and entertaining documentary by Lazarus.’ — Underground Film Journal

 

____________
Interview 2009

 

_______
Obituary

 

‘A question that one should never ask an experimental film-maker is: “What is your film about?” George Landow, who has died unexpectedly aged 67, would probably have responded: “It’s about eight minutes.” Along with many other “structural” American film directors in the 1960s and 1970s, Landow – who changed his name to the semi-anagram Owen Land in 1977 – rejected linear narrative, giving primacy to the shape and essence of film. “I didn’t want to make films that were narrative. I found the whole traditional narrative approach was really non-visual,” he commented.

‘Landow trained to be a painter. This is demonstrated in the self-explanatory title of Landow’s Film in Which There Appear Edge Lettering, Sprocket Holes, Dirt Particles, Etc (1966). What he called “the dirtiest film ever made” consists of four identical images of a blinking woman, off-centre, made to appear as a loop without a beginning and end, giving prominence to the sprocket holes and edge lettering on the 16mm film, components that audiences do not normally see. Landow used “found footage”, in this case a Kodak colour test, throughout his oeuvre, where film itself is the subject matter.

‘Landow later parodied his early experimental films and those of his mentors, Stan Brakhage and Gregory Markopoulos, with jokey titles such as On the Marriage Broker Joke As Cited By Sigmund Freud in Wit and Its Relation to the Unconscious Or Can the Avant-Garde Artist Be Wholed? (1977–79). This features two actors dressed as pandas who discuss film in a false-perspective room patterned with checks and polka dots. “What is a ‘structural film’?” asks one. “That’s easy, everybody knows what a structural film is,” comes the reply. “It’s when engineers design an aeroplane, or a bridge, and they build a model to find out if it will soon fall apart. The film shows where all the stresses are.” The pandas then suggest strategies for marketing Japanese salted plums illustrated by a Japanese publicity film created to look like found footage.

Remedial Reading Comprehension (1970), in the form of an educational film that is part of a woman’s dreams, uses colour footage of an auditorium of people who are about to watch a film, a mock television commercial about rice, text from a speed-reading manual, and the director himself running, with the superimposed words, “This is a film about you … not about its maker.” In New Improved Institutional Quality: In the Environment of Liquids and Nasals a Parasitic Vowel Sometimes Develops (1976), a middle-aged man attempts to carry out a test full of seemingly meaningless instructions before entering transcendence through a woman’s shoe.

Dialogues, his valedictory film, was based on his own bizarre and comic sexual encounters with women and his relationship with his contemporaries, including a mocking portrait of Maya Deren, the avant-garde film-maker. He was given a retrospective at the Rotterdam film festival in 2005. This programme then moved to the Tate Modern in London, the Whitney Museum of American Art in New York and the Pompidou Centre in Paris. In 2009, his work was presented at the Kunsthalle in Bern and the Kunst-Werke, Berlin.

‘This was the last film Landow made before becoming Owen Land and leaving the underground film scene for more than three decades. He reappeared with his last film, Dialogues (2009). Little is known of his movements in between. He spent a year in Japan and taught film at US universities throughout the 1970s, and settled in Los Angeles in 2006. Landow died as mysteriously as he had lived. His death was announced a month after his body was found in his Los Angeles apartment.’ — Ronald Bergan, The Guardian

 

_____
8 of Owen Land’s 17 films

_______________
Film In Which There Appear Edge Lettering, Sprocket Holes, Dirt Particles, Etc (1965-66)
‘This film takes the view that certain defining characteristics of the medium, such as those mentioned in the title, are visually “worthy”. For this reason it is especially recommended.’ — Lux

‘The richest frame I have seen in any film when you take into consideration all movements lines the beautiful whites, and reds and blacks… The kinetic and visual experienced produced by Landow’s film is even more difficult to describe… There is humour in it (the blink); there is clear Mozart -(Mondrian)- like sense of form … ‘ — Jonas Mekas

 

______________
The Evil Faerie (1966)
The Evil Faerie is a movie starring Steven M. Zinc. It is directed by Owen Land. It is one minute in length.’ — mrr

Watch the film here

 

_______________
Diploteratology: Bardo Follies (1967)
‘His remarkable faculty is as maker of images … the images he photographs are among the most radical, super-real and haunting images the cinema has ever given us.’ — P. Adams Sitney

 

_______________
Film That Rises to the Surface of Clarified Butter (1968)
‘This film had already been in my mind for a very long time, this type of film. I wanted to do a film which dealt with drawings which somehow had a life of their own, which existed in the same space as real objects and yet still had their own two-dimensional space. I wanted a kind of imagery that didn’t refer to anything in our visual vocabulary, and also was so non-objective that it didn’t refer to anything.’ — George Landow (aka Owen Land)

 

_______________
Remedial Reading Comprehension (1970)
‘Two kinds of material are used: 1) Material in the tradition of the “psycho-drama” or “personal film”; 2) Material of the sort used in industrial, educational, or advertising film. Questions are raised about the necessity of using acceptably “artistic” material to make a work of art, as well as about the relationships between “personal” and “impersonal” works. “One of the ways that REMEDIAL READING COMPREHENSION works is in the degree of filmic distance which each image has in the film. Distance here refers to the degree of awareness on the part of the viewer that the image he is watching is a film image, rather than ‘reality.’ [Land’s] film does not try to build up an illusion of reality, to combine the images together with the kind of spatial or rhythmic continuity that would suggest that one is watching ‘real’ people or objects. It works rather toward the opposite end, to make one aware of the unreality, the created and mechanical nature, of film.’ — Fred Camper

 

_______________
Thank You Jesus for the Eternal Present (1973)
‘A rapturous audiovisual mix that `deliberately seeks a hidden order in randomness.’ The film combines the face of a woman in ecstatic, contemplative prayer with shots of an animal rights activist, and a scantily clad model advertising Russian cars at the International Auto Show in New York.’ — IFFR

 

_______________
New Improved Institutional Quality: In the Environment of Liquids and Nasals a Parasitic Vowel Sometimes Develops (1976)
‘A reworking of an earlier film, Institutional Quality, in which the same test was given. In the earlier film the person taking the test was not seen, and the film viewer in effect became the test taker. The newer version concerns itself with the effects of the test on the test taker. An attempt is made to escape from the oppressive environment of the test – a test containing meaningless, contradictory, and impossible-to-follow directions – by entering into the imagination. In this case it is specifically the imagination of the filmmaker, in which the test taker encounters images from previous Land films …. The test taker is “initiated” into this world by passing through a shoe (the shoe of “the woman who has dropped something”) which has lost its normal spatial proportions, just as taking the test has caused the test taker to lose his sense of proportion. As he moves through the images in the filmmaker’s mind, the test taker is in a trance-like state, and is carried along by some unseen force …. At the end of the film the test taker is back at his desk, still following directions. His “escape” was only temporary, and thus not a true escape at all.’ — Canyon Cinema

 

______________
On the Marriage Broker Joke as Cited by Sigmund Freud in Wit and Its Relation to the Unconscious or Can the Avant-Garde Artist Be Wholed? (1977)
‘ON THE MARRIAGE BROKER JOKE … turns upon an opposition of Freudian analysis and Christian hermeneutics …. Two pandas, who exist only because of a textual error, run a shell game for the viewer in an environment with false perspectives. They posit the existence of various films and characters, one of which is interpreted by an academic as containing religious symbolism. Sigmund Freud’s own explanation is given by a sleeper awakened by an alarm clock.’ — P. Adams Sitney

Watch the film here

 

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** Armando, Hi. I hadn’t noticed that about Malick, but, based on a quick thought/rerun, I think you’re right. Huh. Sorry, yesterday was an intense day. I’ll get to your email today. I have no idea about the ‘Crowd’ shows in Annecy. Check the theatre’s website? No, ‘TIHYWD’ is a piece from more than ten years ago. It has played in Paris five times before over the years, I think. ** Corey Heiferman, Hi. Ah, I see, it’s a place to exhibit rather than film? Gotcha. You need interns. ** David Ehrenstein, Hi. I still think mentioning your sale on social media would get more response than just mentioning it here. Everyone, FaBlog takes on the Chris Matthews controversy right here. ** _Black_Acrylic, Hi. Yeah, there’ve actually a bunch of artists/filmmakers/musicians who’ve set pianos on fire. I ended up having to pick and choose for the post. Interesting about the new DG film, and obviously cool that you’re getting a showing there. ** Bernard, Hi, B. Well, there’s still time. You’re most welcome about the ‘Golden Boys’ retrieve. Once I realised I could do a decent ‘best of’, it became a no brainer. You are, and will always be, The Sex Guy, don’t worry. Ha ha. Oh, shit, get and feel better. You must tail-ending it now, yes? You’re going to AWP. I’ve always wanted to go, but it’s always too difficult for whatever reason. It seems like it should be very invigorating. And, yeah, so many interesting writers and presses to interact with face to face. That should be pretty swell. I’d be curious to hear what you make of it. Ah, okay, UK and Ireland. Hopefully without heatwaves. And Paris will be a Eurostar away if you need a fix. Cool, thank you for letting Diarmuid know people are excited for his book. That post got ‘likes’ mega-galore. Pretty crazy. Get well immediately. ** Misanthrope, Oh, sure, you know me, every possible ramification of every post is thought through like a fine toothed comb before I launch it. Wouldn’t want to screw anyone up. I liked things about ‘Heredity’, and I didn’t like other things about it. Which is the case in general with these ‘artful’ horror films that seem to be the trend du jour. Maybe it was just your descriptive abilities, but your MRI experience sounds kind of fun to me. Coronavirus is pretty impactful over here in different ways. Normally the area where I live is completely swarmed with tour bus-originating Chinese tourists in these giant clumps that fill the sidewalks day and night, and, in the last two weeks, I haven’t seen a single one of them. Just one tiny offshoot. But, yeah, in Italy right now it’s scary. So I think it’s a real thing. ** Bill, Hi, Bill. Yes, indeed, about Alex Rose, but I think in his work it’s always the fire’s aftermath? I could be wrong there. If letterboxd is the force behind your curtain, you’re still the Wizard of Oz in my book. My copy of the Steve Abbott book is in the mail. I’m excited. ** Okay. I urge you to use the opportunity the blog affords you today to get to know or re-appreciate the films of the lovely and peculiarly brilliant filmmaker Owen Land. See you tomorrow.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 DC's

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑