The blog of author Dennis Cooper

Category: Uncategorized (Page 10 of 1102)

Bloody 3

_______________
Andrei Molodkin Putin Filled With Ukrainian Blood (2022)
‘Artist Andrei Molodkin has produced a portrait of Vladimir Putin filled with blood as a protest against the invasion of Ukraine. The new work was done in collaboration with his Ukrainian friends and co-workers, who symbolically donated their blood before returning to their home country to fight. Since then, Molodkin has opened his doors at The Foundry to their wives and children fleeing the war.’

 

_______________
Imran Qureshi And they still seek the traces of blood (2013)
‘Imran Qureshi’s “And they still seek the traces of blood” (2013) has become renowned for its ability to invoke emotional responses from viewers as this intrinsic work is printed on thousands of crumpled sheets of paper and gathered to form a precipitous heap. The title of his work, “And they still seek the traces of blood quotes a poem by Faiz Ahmed Faiz1 with reference to individuals who have been killed and buried without their lives honoured nor the events surrounding their deaths investigated.’

 

_______________
Renluka Maharaj Lillah (2019)

 

_______________
Ted Lawson Ghost In The Machine (2015)
‘Brooklyn artist Ted Lawson hooked himself up to a robotic painting machine that used his blood as ink to draw a nude portrait of himself. As part of a series of artworks made using Computer Numerically Controlled (CNC) machines – originally programmed to paint with a self-filling brush and ink device – Ted Lawson decided to hack the device to use his own blood, which led to the notion of a self-portrait.’


Turning the video’s volume off is recommended.

 

_______________
Lil Nas X and MSCHF Satan Shoes (2021)
‘The red and black kicks include a pentagram, the “Devil’s Star,” and an inscription of “Luke 10:18,” the Bible passage that reads, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.” The air bubble at the sole of the shoe contains about two fluid ounces of red ink and a drop of human blood, supplied by people who work at MSCHF. The packaging includes drawings of the Devil walking up to Jesus. All 666 pairs of the rapper’s Satan Shoes, listed at $1,018, sold out in under a minute.’

‘The shoes were made using Nike Air Max 97s, but the sportswear giant has said they do not endorse them, filing a lawsuit against MSCHF for trademark infringement. Nike claims that the “unauthorized” sneaker has caused confusion amongst customers, many of whom believe that the company is promoting Satanism.’

 

_______________
Simeen FarhatBlood Shot is Blood Loved (2017)

 

_______________
Riley Harmon What it is Without the Hand That Wields it (2008)
‘Violence is an inevitable, mechanical function of the human brain, hard-coded down through time by culture, genetics, and evolution. Mediated experiences of killing change our perception of violence and death. As players die in a public video game server for Counter-strike, a popular online first person shooter, the electronic solenoid valves spray a small amount of fake blood. The trails left down the wall create a physical manifestation of nebulous kills. In simple terms it is about manifesting experiences that are purely virtual, or only ‘real’ in a psychological sense, into the physical world – physical computing.’

 

_______________
Heji Shin Baby (2016)

 

_______________
César Bardoux Blood pouch (2018)
Oil on canvas

 

_______________
Jordan Eagles Blood Equality Illuminations (2017)
‘Blood Equality Illuminations unites 59 voluntary human blood donations from the MSM (men who have sex with men) community that Eagles collected for the Blood Mirror project. The donations came from two groups – the first from nine individuals, each with unique life experiences and perspectives, highlighting the repercussions of the ban and the importance of full equality, and the second group combined blood from a community of 50 PrEP (Pre-exposure prophylaxis – a daily pill proven to be 99.9% effective in preventing HIV transmission (iPrEx trial)) advocates, each of whom donated a single tube of blood – the 50 tubes amount to a full pint, which is the amount of a standard blood donation.

‘For Blood Equality Illuminations this blood was scanned and printed as digital composites and then projected onto surfaces to create an immersive installation. Through the projection you can ‘step into’ the blood – blood which could have been used medically and given to someone in need by way of a selfless act.’

 

______________
Aida Ruilova Hey, 2001 (2001)

 

_______________
Hermann Nitsch Oedipus (1990)
Sculpture

 

_____________
Mike Parr Cathartic Action: Social Gestus no. 5 (The Armchop) 1977 (2020)
‘Creating discomfort in his audience, artist Mike Parr invites spectators to watch in grand awe as he is hacking off his bloody arm with a meat cleaver – however, unbeknownst to them, it is a prosthetic limb filled with meat and fake blood.’

 

_____________
Louise Bourgeois Untitled (Hearts) (2006)
Incised with the artist’s initials and dated 2006 on a plate, rubber and steel

 

______________
Barnaby Furnas Boogie Man (2005)
Oil and watercolor on linen

 

______________
Maxwell Rushton Inside Out (2016)
‘Rushton has taken the concept of putting yourself into your art quite seriously, and quite literally.The significance of blood cannot be overstated, Rushton has decanted his own blood, and actually used his body as painting material in his artwork, turning himself into a logo. Peter Beard was ground breaking in using animal blood to paint over images of animals he photographed, but Rushton has literally transformed himself into a logo.’

 

______________
Chiharu Shiota Earth and blood (2014)

 

______________
Johanna Levy Blood and Data Flows: in my panties (2017)

 

______________
Nalini MalaniIn Search of Vanished Blood (2012)
‘In Search of Vanished Blood is the most consummate and compelling example of Malani’s ‘video shadow plays’ series that she has been developing since 2001. This installation comprises of 5 reverse painted rotating mylar cylinders and six video projections and sound. It is an immersive kaleidoscopic environment, and its title comes from a poem by the Pakistani poet Faiz Ahmed Faiz. The piece itself is inspired by the 1984 novel Cassandara by Christa Wolf, and the 1910 book The Notebooks of Malte Laurids Brigge by Rainer Maria Rilke. The visuals are accompanied by a soundscape made of a collage of lines from Heiner Mullers 1977 Hamletmachine, Samuel Beckett’s 1958 Krapp’s Last Tape and Gayatri Spivak’s 1997 English translation of the short story Draupadi by the social activist and writer Mahasweta Devi.’

 

______________
Wang Xiaofeng Series: work with no series (2009)
‘The surrounding sounds pass through the sound sensor and controller to influence the height of a fountain of pigs blood erupting from the middle of an iron pan.’

 

______________
Horacy Muszyński ASS.DEATH.DICKS (2019)
‘Horacy Muszyński’s film series, ASS.DEATH.DICKS (read: aesthetics), tells the story of six young artists invited to work on an exhibition. It is supposed to be their first major project, and the launch of their artistic careers. However, due to creative-block frustration, envy, or ruthless ambition, the young artists start killing each other, turning the gallery white-cube into a bloodbath. According to Muszyński, nowadays rivalry is not only young artists’ main motivation, but also society’s drive at large. Brutal and bloody, ASS.DEATH.DICKS (read: aesthetics) exposes egocentrism and a will to win at all costs.’

 

______________
Ed Ruscha Boiling Blood, Fly (1969)

 

______________
Johann Kresnik 120 Tage von Sodom (Volksbühne, 2015)
‘Austrian director Johann Kresnik – a warhorse of the dance-theatre world who’s been nicknamed “Der Berserker” for loud productions containing a lot of blasphemous imagery – has taken on the novel The 120 Days of Sodom, written by the Marquis de Sade while he was imprisoned in the Bastille. Kresnik has also drawn from Pier Paolo Pasolini’s grim and graphic 1975 film of the same name.

‘As in those works, we’ve got a group of corrupt libertines who enact sadistic fantasies and perversions on young sex slaves. For the 75-year-old Kresnik, that means enough nudity and stage blood to tide audiences over for the rest of 2015. More precisely: cannibalism, copulation, crap-eating, and castration of Christ on the cross (followed by consumption of his cojones as communion).

‘And it’s all in the name of making a statement against capitalism and consumerism. (I’ll take a break from the alliteration now.) As blood-and-grime covered performers writhe about naked, and a zombie conga line in dirty rags dances to “Gangnam Style,” and an infant is ripped out of its mother’s belly, hacked apart and cooked on a real grill, there’s a lot of screaming about Konsumfaschismus, Facebook and banking. Politics, we’re told, is just one big supermarket.

‘But if Kresnik is actually interested in making a cogent argument, he doesn’t show it. Rather than shocking, the onstage brutality feels silly, as superficial as the consumer culture it’s attempting to critique.’

 

______________
Billie Grace Lynn Dead Mouse (2011)

 

______________
Claudio Cavallari Suitcase n.85 – Blood and Ink (2013)
‘Visualisation of suitcase of blood and ink for the “THE TULSE LUPER SUITCASES” by Peter Greenaway.’

 

______________
Judy Watson a preponderance of aboriginal blood (2005)

 

______________
Handmade Acoustic (2018)

 

______________
Marianna Simnett Blood (2015)
‘Blood runs thicker than water – which is maybe why it clots and coagulates. Emotions adhere to notions of blood, and what it represents; signifying kinship, invoking destiny; marking the body as a source of vitality or, on occasion, a site of shame. Blood goes deep, and in so doing it can get messy. Marianna Simnett knows this. Her short film, adorned with its deceptively simple title Blood, deals in both its material and its mythological dimensions.’

Watch an excerpt here

 

______________
Rebecca Horn Overflowing Blood Machine (1970)
‘Horn’s machine evokes medical apparatus, though its function remains unclear. Horn says of this piece, ‘the performer is tied up on top of a glass container (more an aquarium), tubes surrounding his body. Blood pumps, slowly, circulated through the glass container through the plastic tubes; enclosing his body like a pulsing garment of veins [it] forces the evolution of the motionless person into being an extension of the mechanism itself’.’

 

______________
Eleanor Antin Blood of a Poet Box (1965–8)
‘American artist Eleanor Antin produced Blood of a Poet Box very early in her career, while she was living in New York. The work comprises a green specimen box containing one hundred glass slides, each holding a blood sample that Antin took from a poet – a loosely defined category that also included artists, performers and dancers. A handwritten list stuck inside the box lid catalogues these contributors, whose blood was taken by Antin at the many poetry readings and performance events that were a feature of the New York avant-garde during the 1960s.’

 

______________
Sterling Ruby Various (2014 – 2018)


“Red Uniform”


“Bloody Pots”


“Monument”

 

______________
Cassandra Chilton and Molly O’Shaughnessy You Beaut (2017)
‘Cassandra and Molly O’Shaughnessy, two members of the Hotham Street Ladies, are behind You Beaut. This piece features two toilet stalls covered extensively with graffiti of uteruses, including examples of uterine diseases and abnormalities. The entire work is painted with royal icing, piped from icing bags in shapes and patterns that give an uncomfortably visceral yet undeniably delicious quality to the uterine diagrams. In one stall, a uterus has menorrhagia, or heavy menstrual bleeding, depicted by volumes of vivid red icing laced with red raspberry lollies pouring down the wall and out the cubicle door. The icing pools in large droplets on the floor, uncomfortably, tantalisingly close to the viewer.’

 

______________
Naoki Kato Blood Splatter (2019)

 

______________

Flavia Lupu Finish’it (2013)
‘The principle: we have a woman who offers herself, hypothetically, to the public to be abused. Participants can intervene with a gilded hammer, nails and other objects that are on a table, also gilded, used in the medical system.

‘The substrate: an ambiguous relationship. Those who take part in the action „are plaing”, being, most likely, amused. The experiment is a fake. Metaphorically, a reference is made to the idea of identity as an image that others, that are stronger, can have, depending on the authority they hold, within the accepted possibilities (hammer, nails, wires, knife, etc. – in this case). At the subconscious level we do not know if the public feels that they use the power that they have over a simple sheet of paper, or if they have the feeling of freedom to dispose of a person in a way that would be impossible in real life.’

 

_______________
More blood spilled Thursday in Kevin Hilton’s Criminal Justice classroom than was extracted by Freddy Krueger, Jason Voorhees and Michael Myers during their entire horror movie careers combined. Volunteer High School’s Criminal Justice classroom was the gruesome scene of a lesson in blood spatter investigation that had the walls, floor, ceiling and even some of Hilton’s 85 students dripping with gore. “Since this was Halloween, I thought it would be a good opportunity to show them how to do blood spatter, how to measure it, analyze it, look at it,” Hilton told the Times News. “This is one of the most popular hands on activities that we do. Kids just seem to love it.”’

 

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** Dominik, Hi!!! Yes, dilemma, but if the festival thing happens, we’ll do it. Film comes first. Eek, has the mystery of the stink been solved … err, pleasantly? Can I be love’s designated phone call helper if ‘WWtbaM’ still does that? Although, well, love seems like he’d have those bases pretty covered. Love all bloodied and smiling beatifically, G. ** _Black_Acrylic, Cool that the Treut sat well. Congrats on the 1-0. That goal was a pretty thing. ** Carsten, Beach bum mode, nice. I’m more of a slather on the sunscreen dude. I’m not the best judge of warmth, but at least in the summer, at least when I’ve been in Marseille, it broils. Oh, no, no outrage. I like lists. They’re fun. But hierarchies always make me roll my eyes. Interesting to know where that site’s head is at. The German festival isn’t a for sure quite yet, and the protocol of these things is the filmmakers can’t say anything until the festival announces. I think it’ll happen. ** Mark Johnson, Hi! How nice to have you here. I saw your comment yesterday, and I’m friends with Bruce, so I contacted him. He says the problem is that Smith’s estate has two owners who greatly disagree about what should happen to his work, which is why the work remains disappeared. He said he thinks Semiotext(e) has the work. I don’t know if he meant they have the work on hand or if they have some kind of rights to it. He suggested you contact Hedi at Semiotext(e). I hope that’s at all helpful, and I sure hope you can publish ‘Days in the Clouds’. What a boon that would be. Thanks! ** jay, Hi, j! Smith’s book covers all kind of topics. There’s an amazing essay about Levis that reads them through this incredibly obsessive numerology filter. I really hope that book comes back. There’s nothing like it. ‘Benny’s Video’ might be my second favorite, so high five on the excellent taste front, bud. Ah, your dad is Hungarian, okay, now it makes a little more sense. But still. So happy the trilogy is insinuating itself into you. It certainly haunts me. Best weekend in recorded history to you. ** Steeqhen, Oops. Power through, man. You know you can. I have never played a Pokemon game weirdly. I don’t even know what they are other than looks-wise. ** Tosh Berman, If you can somehow get his book, it’s really something. I’m positive you’ll be super glad you did. I look forward to hearing about your visit with Michael from Jeff. Its niceness is a big relief, obviously. ** Mari, Hi, hi! Mm, no, I don’t worry about that. Granted I’m a relentless optimist, but I think the current fascist hell will fade out before too, too long just like all the arch conservative rules from the top always do eventually. It’s true that right now is as bad as things could possibly be, but … Otherwise, no, books survive even if it’s in small numbers, and distinctive things always have long if sometimes limited lives, I think. ‘God Jr.’ was kind of influenced by two Nintendo 64 games: ‘Banjo Kazooie’ and ‘Conker’s Bad Fur Day’. No, I’ve never consulted a psychic. When I was writing ‘I Wished’ and was really in a bad mental/emotional space thinking about my friend George, a friend who does tarot offered to do a reading for me and try to put me in touch with him. And it was really weird because he did the reading and his face turned white when he saw the cards, and he said that he was being told that me getting in touch with George was extremely dangerous, and he refused to continue the reading. I don’t believe in tarot, but I’ve always wondered what that meant. Writing non-fiction did help my fiction, yes, because I learned how to structure something to give it a kind of narrative build up, and I hadn’t known how to do that very well before. In that sense it did give me a valuable skill set, even I don’t use it all that much. Thank you for asking those things. It’s great that you’re excited about the classes. I don’t know that I really know what coding involves, but I love codes and decoding and so on. Awesome! How are you spending your last ‘free’ days? ** Steve, This weekend: work, film stuff, hopefully see some art. No big whoop. It’s fall here too now, and it’s so, so nice. In the actual home haunt scene, no, not really. I’m very interested though obviously. There’s a big annual home haunt convention in LA, but it’s always at a time when I can’t be there, and I would love to explore there and schmooze. Maybe next year. Everyone, Three reviews from Steve for you this weekend, and they are … Alex Russell’s LURKER here, Ethan Coen’s aptly named HONEY DON’T! here, and Nourished By Time’s THE PASSIONATE ONES here. I’m kind of curious about ‘Lurker’ and interested to see what you think. ** julian, Hi. Yeah, Smith is the kind of old school conspiracy theorist who used to amaze and delight. Congrats on the new apartment. Hopefully you’ll like living alone. It’s great to get work done if you like digging into your things. Your friend is nuts! Oh, he lay down behind the drum kit and kind of hit the shell of the bass drum with a drum stick. He did hit it pretty hard though, I’ll give him that. ** Jeff J, Fascinating book if you can find it. Got the Zoom link, thanks! ‘That Smell’, no, I don’t know it at all. Huh. Great, I’ll make an effort to find it. Thanks a bunch, pal. ** Tyler Ookami, That does sound really good! ** Hugo, Hi. Historical figure + cigarette … huh, it’s hard not to chose Rimbaud because when I was younger I was obsessed with inventing a time machine so I could back and hang out with him. Otherwise, gosh, I think maybe I would choose Hollis Frampton. But of course I would be happy to smoke with any of your guys’ choices, although I did smoke with Kathy a few times, so that one’s less romantic to me. It’s autumn-y and dreamy here. Peaceful weekend at all costs. ** HaRpEr //, I saw The Replacements maybe five times, and they were always a mess. It’s just whether it was an inspiring mess or an off-night mess. Yes, and the Big Star comparison, sure. Good writing day, whoopie! Very cool. The Holly Woodlawn book is very sweet. Sort of apropos, have you read ‘I Could Not Believe It: The 1979 Teenage Diaries of Sean DeLear’? It’s wonderful. ** Okay. Here’s the third edition of my Bloody series to escort you through the weekend. See you on Monday.

Spotlight on … Duncan Smith The Age of Oil (1986)

 

‘The near invisibility, online as well as off, of writer Duncan Smith (1954-1991) is a stark reminder of how thoroughly information can go missing, or never emerge at all. The barely visible traces left by Smith, who published little during his lifetime, can be easily and briefly enumerated: The Age of Oil, his 1987 book of essays, long out of print and extremely rare; a few articles in the back issues of Flash Art, Artforum, Semiotext(e) and Art & Text (most of which were reprinted in The Age of Oil); a catalogue essay for a show of graffiti art at a Munich gallery; a contribution to a book on painter Alain Jacquet, and the text (partly co-authored with Diego Cortez) for a book of photographs of Elvis Presley during his Army years in Germany. The only examples of his writing currently online are two brief essays and his translation of a text by Friedrich Schlegel on the website of Bomb Magazine, which published him while he was alive.

‘Oddly, Smith may be best known not for his writing but for his appearance in Eric Mitchell’s film Kidnapped (1978), an hour-long Super-8 document of No Wave Cinema viewable on YouTube. Yet even here his presence is elusive. The author of a recent article on Kidnapped is at a loss to identify Smith beyond his name: “It’s a hangout movie with Mitchell, actress and No Wave fixture Patti Astor, Mudd Club co-founder and James Chance (of The Contortions) manager Anya Phillips, Teenage Jesus and the Jerks bass player Gordon Stevenson, and the mysterious Duncan Smith.” In other discussions of Kidnapped and the downtown scene, people who are apparently unfamiliar with his writings often misidentify Smith as an artist.

‘None of this would be worth commenting on—after all, history, even recent history, is full of forgotten authors, obscure bohemians and marginal cultural figures—were it not for the fact that Smith was a writer and theorist of striking originality. Valuable in their own right, his experiments with language paralleled and very likely influenced the work of important visual artists of the 1980s. Smith was also a candid chronicler of New York City gay life, pre and post AIDS, and a sharp-eyed observer of American popular culture. Wielding a self-invented style that pushed the strategies of post-structuralism into the realm of experimental literature, Smith mined Freud, Lacan and Derrida to pursue his own obsessive theories of language and society. Beginning in the late 1970s, long before Chris Kraus’s I Love Dick, he dared to mix confession and critical theory in a radical manner that is as close to his literary contemporaries such as Kathy Acker as to any postmodern art theorist.

‘Typically, Smith’s essays begin with a fragment extracted from everyday existence—a common phrase, an object, an encounter—which he then subjects to a series of variations and deformations that draw on classical rhetoric and psychoanalysis. The departure point for “Reflection on Rhetoric in Bars” is Smith and a friend being pushed out of a bar at closing time. “Why Diamonds Are a Girl’s Best Friend” unpacks the clichéd phrase of the title. The brief text “On Wit” meditates on the significance of the popping of a champagne cork.” Smith’s most favored source, however, is the entertainment industry. The first essay in The Age of Oil, for instance, offers an explanation of Elvis Presley’s propensity to give away expensive cars, which Smith traces back to the singer’s obsession with his mother and his twin brother who died at birth. As in much of Smith’s writing, “An Interpretation of Elvis’s Car Giving” hinges on proper names, and frequently resorts to italics. …

‘Over the next three and a half pages—this is one of his shorter pieces—we learn how the name “Cadillac” can be read as “a virtual rebus of events in Elvis’s life” as Smith uses the brand’s three syllables (“cad” “ill” and “lac”) to uncover the rock ‘n’ roller’s hidden motivations. Elvis’s choice of Cadillacs as gifts is, in Smith’s account, over-determined. His mother, it appears, fell in love with Cadillacs when she saw a “fine lady” drive up to a hospital in one. “This very hospital,” Smith observes, “with its doctors and sophisticated medical technology could have relieved her of the death of Jesse Garon.” With his first paycheck from Colonel Parker, Elvis bought his mother a Cadillac, a car whose name, says Smith, “echoes the name Garon whose bereavement would last all the Presleys’ lives.” For Elvis, Smith speculates, the first syllable of “Cadillac” mirrors his propensity for misbehaving, sparked by his guilt for being the surviving twin: “With cad one is first struck by the association with a cad, a bad boy, a jilter. The radical innocence of a dead infant perpetually stipulated that the evils of Elvis would prove him a cad, a bad boy.” After spinning phrases around “ill” and “lac” Smith arrives, in the penultimate paragraph, at the word “car”: “This car was made possible by Colonel Parker’s deal with RCA, Elvis’s new record company. Car and RCA are anagrams. The car/Cadillac was also the RCA/Cadillac that would be able to buy his mother gifts that filled the lack of Garon.” …

‘There is so much more to be said about Duncan Smith, both his writings and his place in and influence on the New York artworld. I haven’t mentioned his activity as a poet, nor his involvement with the music scene, nor even touched on Days in the Clouds, an unpublished collection of his essays from 1987 to 1991 in which he writes at length, and heartbreakingly, about his battle with AIDS, his experiences as a gay man in New York, and his departure from the city, initially for Cornell to work on his Ph.D, then to Portland, Oregon, where he died. For now, more than a quarter century after his death, it is perhaps enough to break, if only slightly, the silence that has far too long enveloped him and his writing.’ — Raphael Rubinstein

 

_____
Further

Duncan Smith by Raphael Rubinstein
Everybody Wants Exposure by Duncan Smith
Schlegel on Wit by Duncan Smith
Why Diamonds Are a Girl’s Best Friend by Duncan Smith
Private Elvis, Edited by Diego Cortez with text by Duncan Smith, 1978.
‘The Age of Oil’ @ goodreads
‘The Age of Oil’ is out of print, but …

 

____
Extra


Kidnapped [Eric Mitchell, 1978] Featuring Duncan Smith, Patti Astor, Anya Phillips, Gordon Stevenson.

 

___
Book

Duncan Smith The Age of Oil
Slate Press

‘A key figure in the Downtown art, film and music scenes of the late 1970s and early 1980s, Smith, who died of AIDS in 1991, forged a unique style, a distinctive interpretative apparatus, that pushed techniques borrowed from psychoanalysis and post-structuralism into the realm of avant-garde writing. He was also—though not in this particular essay—a memoirist of heartbreaking effect. In his brief life (he was 36 when he died), Smith had a significant though as yet unacknowledged influence on the course of contemporary art, most notably via dialogues with his friends Jean-Michel Basquiat and Rammellezee, whose art is pervaded by radical wordplay very close to Smith’s); his own work, beyond his writings, includes collages, collaborative projects such as an unpublished photo-text book about the movie Sunset Boulevard created with artist Seth Tillett, and roles in legendary underground films such as Eric Mitchell’s Kidnapped and Underground USA.’ — Raphael Rubinstein

 

______
Excerpt

from On the Current Symbolic Status of Oil

Cars, as everyone knows, are powered by oil, a condition that powerful interests have aligned Western countries, America in particular, to for many decades. Oil is the law for a car’s operation, and the law, or as the French would say, la loi, is oil. The loi/law of oil is thus necessary for the American car to go anywhere. And where will the ego goe without oil, without a car? Heretofore the loi has always been cars driven by oil. This is witnessed by the failure of steam driven and electrically powered cars to have any success on the internal combustion machine market, the present-day oil powered cars made in Detroit. Without the loi of oil (conditioned by car companies and oil companies), there would be the likehood of no oil, no oil for egos to goe on. This is the supreme threat to America’s ego for without it nothing will goe, unless America’s interests liquidate the aggressive, oil-hoarding counterpart. Goe over there…

Within the car there is a radio, and within the word car there is the anagram RCA. Originally a company aligned to the technical innovation of transmitting sound over distances, RCA became equatable with the radio. And nearly every car has a radio or RCA (letterally) within it.

Cars and radios are thus in intimate connection, rhetorically a metonymic one. What is interesting is that cars are powered by oil just as radios, in association, are powered by oil. Both are in conjunction with oil, cars burn oil while radios play oil, that is, records, made of oil or vinyl, are played over the apparatus of a radio. The car that burns oil reproduces the radio that plays oil, here records, an oil-derived product. Even the word radio has two essential letters for car.

Again without oil our cars or RCA could not goe. The loss of oil to power our cars is as threatening as the loss of oil/vinyl/records for our RCA, our popular music, played over the car radio, the radio cryptically echoing the car it is contained in. We hear the radio with our cars, noting another similarity between car and ear. Ears hear the car radio. Also, ear is within hear. Since we have ended up identifying with our cars so much, we’ve also ended up identifying with the stars our ears hear, our popular musicians heard on music stations over the radio. Elvis Presley loved cars, which is inevitable since he was signed over to the record company RCA. America loves cars and loves to hear Elvis Presley. The lack of oil will then make loving cars and hearing rock stars an impossibility (since their voices are on an oil/vinyl record).

Ears have wax in them. Wax too is synonymous with oil, as demonstrated by the title for a hit record called Hot Wax, now transformable into Hot Oil. There is already oil in our ears, the wax, enforced by the idea that there is oil in our cars, in our radios. To be close to the music played over the radio seems to be a condition we have already met up with because the wax/oil makes the distantly playing record much more interior and proximate. Popular music resolves this distance by using words in songs that are exchangeable with its listeners. We then presume the sung material to be our very own, our “feelings.” Singing the record to oneself is an introjection, an interiorization of the distant singer. The singer is brought closer to ourselves, just as the unconscious idea is one of already possessing that record inside our ears, but as ear wax or ear oil.

Around the time that cars and radios were assuming their egological power over American citizens, UFO’s were being cited in great numbers. You could surmise this bit of common knowledge to be widespread around the beginning of the 1950s, the beginning of a wide scale introjection of records played on car radios. UFO’s, or flying saucers, were also often cited from people’s ears. Around the time that cars and radios were assuming their egological power over American citizens, UFO’s were being cited in great numbers. You could surmise this bit of common knowledge to be widespread around the beginning of the 1950s, the beginning of a wide scale introjection of records played on car radios. UFO’s, or flying saucers, were also often cited from people’s ears. I’ll venture a correspondence that might illuminate these mutual car/radio/UFO phenomena. A flying saucer is a disco, the Spanish word for saucer or disc. A UFO is often described as a disc-like object, resembling in many instances, a record. Since a record playing on the radio cannot be seen, a UFO can, though very rarely. To see a UFO, to be the lucky person, is also the desire, the delusion to see the disco, disc or record that we never see in a car when the radio plays that record/music we enjoy so much. And that playing record is a burning one, a condensation that accounts for the reported brilliance of UFO’s, the UFO’s that are brightly lit, lit as if on fire or burning. Granted the accounts of people who might have truly seen a saucer, it also bespeaks a delirious curiosity, at heart a desire to see as opposed to hear what those purely heard saucers look like. And their appearance is conditioned by the confusion of burning and playing, transforming the UFO disc into a bright, fiery object.

Furthermore when a radio plays a song, we have no visual equivalent as to how that sound reached the ear, the car’s radio or the radios in our homes. A flying saucer, seen by someone, is the visual transmission of a purely auditory stimulus. And with our reflexes reduced to staring (while driving) so much, the mysterious radio sound is perforce given its sheer visual support, a record that flies into our car. The quickness of the radio signal is also in relation to the UFO, that ultra-fast disc. Crazy as this idea might seem, it fits in with the craziness of the teenagers then who loved to listen to car radios as were those people called “crazy” if they saw a UFO, or fou, the French word for mad or crazy. People who hear pop music go crazy like the people who see UFO discs. A record, a piece of wax, a waxen disc, flies into my ear, a nonidentifiable object, a nonvisual object, the sound. Already crazy with a nonscopic sound in my ear, the record/wax sound makes me crazier and the record/wax/disco/UFO makes me the craziest, since I’m really seeing what I can only hear. Incidentally, a major record and stereo equipment entrepreneur goes by the name “Crazy Eddie.”

When cars goe or drive on tar, they drive over the asphalt on such roads. Without asphalt or tar, there would be no surface for a car to drive on, no tar or oil for a car to drive with and no tar or sound from the records heard over the car radio to listen to. A car travels along a road, a path, a trail. These are the “grooves” on a road, associative with the “grooves” on a record. Road equals record, since both are derived from oil, roads being made of asphalt and records composed of vinyl, derived as asphalt is, of oil products.

The stylus that plays the record is the car that drives along the road. A record’s turning motion allows the stylus to move. The turntable is powered by electricity, often a transformation of energy from oil. A stylus, besides being a writing instrument, is also related to a ship’s prow, the edge that cuts through water. Every car has a hood, a “prow” of sorts. Ships travel as do cars, one on water, the other on land. Both are called “she.” The car/ship has a stylus, podium, prow that cuts along a path, and thus its mark or trail is made. The wake of churned-up water is the ship’s path as the drippings of oil is the car’s path. The oil drippings of cars are the indicia of a car’s path (not to mention its tire marks). The record’s sound from an LP is the index of a stylus’ path. Sound travels on tar/oil/vinyl records as cars travel on tar/oil/asphalt. Thus a stylus traveling down a record groove is an allegory of a car traveling down a road.

In another vein, without oil there would be no art. In art, there’s the word tar, an anagram. Tar is derived from oil. Painters, of course, use oil to make their art. There are many kinds of oil, or many tars: vinyl, records, acrylic, etc. Artists need tar. Artist-musicians need tar/oil, the same kind of tar that’s involved in the manufacture of records. Painters and musicians employ different art forms or they use different tar forms. Some of them can become a star after becoming successful with their art made of tar, such tar allowing them to goe far. The anagrams arts/tars/star are crucial to the symbols that determine an identification in our culture.

With stars on tars doing arts, the lack of oil threatens their activity too. No oil means no arts, not a single star because of the lack of tars. Again without art or tars or star(s), what will that do to star(ing), what will happen to our sight, since no arts/star(s) will be able to be looked at? What films will we see and what car windows will we look through? As well, no ear wax/oil/tars/arts/star(s) over the car’s radio also means an imminent crisis for our hearing. No records played or burned, no RCA and no car, means no sound heard as it means no oil for cars to drive on. Not being able to see and hear, taken in their sense as drives, is also a lack of the energy or oil to keep those drives goeing. The other drives, the oral and anal, also derive from this collapse of culturally shared images, pleasurewords, mythologies and lois. Thus an ego will then not goe without being driven by the four-wheeled drives of the apertures of our bodies, our bodies that have energy or oil along with the rims or sources from which to discharge that energy: the ears, the eyes, the mouth and the anus. Egos go(es) to drive with oil and aim at oil. Oil drives us from one state of oil to another state/taste of oil.

To taste oil introduces oil’s relation to the third gear of the oral drive, noting another phonic resemblance. America’s addiction to tar is as bad as its addiction to the tar in cigarettes. Even low-tar or ultra low-tar cigarettes resonate with the desire to move away from tar, too much tar, too much oil. Low-mileage cars are really low in tar as some cigarettes are. Low-tar cigarettes are a “rationing” of tar, like the inevitable “rationing” of oil when supplies get low. The oral drive, exemplified by smoking, is also present in the repetitive and pleasurable activity in listening to songs over the radio, on the jukebox, on one’s stereo. Both smoking and listening involve tar/ art and oil/vinyl records. Both are an inhalation, since with smoking one interiorizes tar and in the other, in listening, one can interiorize via the mouth the record’s voice. Resinging a popular song that is played on oil is inhaling a cigarette that has “tar” in it. Introjection is an oral affair, and the record assures us of oral stimulation by the silent, but still vocalized, activity under-goeing when we listen, when we hear the wax in our car that we cannot see. True, the ear wax is invisible, the partition between seeing the ear’s contents and the eye that is to accomplish that act is permanent, unless you were enterprising enough to have a photograph taken of it. Oil is not only in our cars, but in our ears, in our eyes (our stares), and in our mouths. A cigarette, believe it or not, is a small car, an i caret get, an I get(te) a car, or simplified, an I get car. Car’s rhyme with tar could mean I get tar for cigarette, “I smoke cigarettes” can translate into either “I smoke I get cars” or “ I smoke I get tars.” With smoking, the cigarette’s smoke is similar to the exhaust that comes from a car, the remains of burnt-up car oil are also the remains of burnt-up tar. But is the cigarette filter’s passage of smoke the only “exhaust” when we, as smokers, exhale the “exhaust” from our mouth? The exhaust of a car resembles either the cigarette smoke that then passes through the lungs, throat and mouth, as an exhalation, as exhaust. Smoking a cigarette is then an allegory of a car burning oil as both of them spew forth “exhaust.”

Another attenuation of the oral/oil drive. The LP for a vinyl record could bear an i between the letters 1 and p, producing lip. LPs are sung on our lips, our singing reproduces the singing on the record. Lip synch is LP synch, a truism to the argument that our culture is heavily involved in the introjection, the filling of an oral void, of records and oil.

Also, introjecting oil is implicated in the confusion as to whether oil is water or not. Oil is not water, but then water is a liquid, just as oil is.

The fourth gear in the “drive” is the anal drive.

Oil companies have a lot of gold from all the money they’ve made. Gold and oil are nearly synonymous, since their prices affect the status of the world market so radically. Oil is precious, but more precious in its refined state. Black, crude, “dirty,” the oil is originally shitty. Refined, made clean by oil refinery, sewage system plants, the oil loses its shittiness and becomes more valuable, like gold, and circulatable, rather than in its less valuable, “dirty,” crude state.

But if oil is shitty in its crude state and then valuable in its refined state, a hit record, or one of the hits, here was once shit, since shit and hits are anagrams of each other. From crude oil equals shit to refined oil or vinyl equals hits as in the phrase “Top 40 Hits” (Shit), oil will always bear the meaning of its excremental status. Records, as texts, are involved in the problematic of being “extrinsic excrement” or “intrinsic ideality” (Derrida). Oil pollutes too, as in oil slicks or massive refinery plant fires. The dead remnants of prehistoric forests left their rich deposits behind so as to fuel our possessions. Oil is the manure of ancient forests just as it is a manure when “crude” or “dirty” before it is cleaned and refined into the Top 40 Hits (Shit) vinyl LPs. The anal drive completes oil’s four-wheel drive that helps the American (to) drive.

Also the anality of oil is prefigured in the means to mine it. Drilling into the earth to yield the riches (Atlantic Richfield ) withheld by resistant layers of crust obeys sadistic, coprophagic ideas. (Coprophagia is “feeding off dung.”) For the earth to withhold its riches is much like the constipated retention of faeces that enemas or in similar fashion oil rigs relieve.

Oil is gold and gold is shit. Thus oil is shit, either because it resembles shit (dark, untouchable, nauseating, hidden from view) or because its extremely valued state allows us to compare it with what is the least valued as gold is with shit. Gifts, and the symbology derived from them, obey oblative, anal drive ideas. Oil companies and

oil rich countries give us oil, or they, in their withholding, retain the precious gift. This is sadism in its truest sense. Furthermore, concern over the profits oil companies make propels moral ideas as to a more proper distribution, another facet of the ablative character of the anal drive. The shit/oil/gold should be circulated in equivalent amounts, otherwise retention forces those lacking into accusations of hoarding, another anal motif.

America’s desire to ration its oil supplies demonstrates what attenuations the anal drive can goe to. Frugality and judicious use of oil are not without their sadistic connotations, a sodomy done to all, while elsewhere lurks the greater sadists, Arabia and the large oil companies.

The unseen character of oil, its abstractness, after all this gross materiality, and its transformation into fire, energy, combustion, etc. is another important idea. I’ve already tried to explain that with records/oil played/burned on an RCA/car, the unseen disc of vinyl returns in the form of a flying saucer. Oil’s invisibility returns in the form of a disco/disc/vinyl record that flies into the car/RCA burning or playing the music. This music is the beat that goes/egos on, drives egos on. Oil is usually the fuel that our eyes do not see. Oftentimes it is a simple mathematical quota in terms of the car’s registration that the fuel is low. It can also be the rapid calculation of gallons and fractions of gallons seen at the gas pump along with its calculation into a price at another adjacent window on the pump. Its abstract character is further testified by its facilitation of general movement from one place to another. Oil is simply energy, and that energy makes things happen, but energy is not the thing, the idea, it simply allows the thing or idea or event to take place. Like the crucial distinction in psychoanalysis between idea and instinct, oil is instinct, the drive to which the idea is “soldered.” (Although Freud distinguished the two.) Oil determines the drive’s energy as well as the object of the drive, the oil-related product. The record’s idea, its music, is made possible by its oil/vinyl as are the housewife’s errands made possible by car fuel. Oil drives the car just as ideas are aligned to drives, the economic factors that account for the ideas’ repetition, their persistence. There can be no idea without its concomitant energetic investment, no idea without the pressure that realizes it. Conversely there can be no energy without an idea attached to such a quantity-ridden abstraction, a notion prey to alinguistic, transcendental assertions. Oil neither escapes its idea, its conceptual, linguistic, presentational status nor does it escape its energetic quanta, its reducibility to simple distributions of affects. The word oil is just as important as its unseen combustions, its mysterious pervasiveness that organizes things while at the same time remains invisible to them.

There is the vulgarity of those who stress pure, nonverbal ascensions into absolute energy, vibration, impulse, quanta, etc. They are at once giving an idea to a sensation (a sign too), this distribution of pressures that is never independent of representation, language, speaking subjects, discourse.

The fad of jogging is a near mystical embrace of this idea of pure energy, but why would they be jogging but in a time-bound situation where the deprivation of oil or energy insists that they have vitality, a lot of energy or oil? Joggers presume their freedom from oil at the very moment when their livelihoods are threatened by its absence. The fastest jogger inversely affirms a slowing down of the I go in cars. One reminder: race and car. Eliminate the e in race and permute the rest of the letters into car. Joggers are in a race, a strange car race. Even the ger in jogger echoes car (c and g arc both velar stops). Mania, here in the jogger, is close to mourning, where the oil-ideal (usually an ego-ideal) is now about to become lost forever to the historical specificity of driving oil-powered automobiles.

Other movement manias, the discomania and the roller skating mania, are close to the problem of the disappearance of oil. Dancing in discos and roller skating obey the general idea of movement and lots of it. Disco music is the music that is in our ears whose ear wax is also the oil that constitutes the records played over sound systems. Hearing oil is also moving to it and being driven by it. Dancing and its euphonic embrace, this mania for the ego in perfect self-presentation, is only about to mourn the loss of what makes the dancers goe so energetically, the oil record or the car/ear oil/wax under question. When we dance our cars are driven by oil and when we drive our cars are driven by oil.

Oil as instinct will probably find its greatest threat in the future when no oil makes impossible libidinal contact with others. The freedom for a young man and woman in a car, flaunting parental admonitions against sex, to have that pleasure (and the car/RCA/radio music that serves to express that impulse) is threatened by no more oil. Goeing elsewhere for sex is becoming an archaism, at least when fuel, energy, oil is involved. Granted there will always be libido, drives and instincts, it’s just that oil has tyrannized ourselves, our autos to the point where its exclusion would result in the deprivation of key ideas governing so much human intercourse. No energy (oil) is no sex, a thought related to Ernest Jones’s observation that what the subject fears most is the loss of libido, aphanisis, an idea more threatening than the irreducibility of castration. Will no oil castrate the Western/ American subject so radically as to force libidinal contact into retreat? Will the lack of oil dismiss representation altogether? An impossibility, despite the intimate congruence between its manufacture and the significations surrounding it. No sex, no art, no stars, no records, along with the absence of their energetic foundations, shows the profound anxiety we’re goeing through. Its resolution appears to be intractably elusive, considering oil’s complex impregnation into our culture’s discourse, our intramental and socially exterior selves, our autos. How can our auto/ego let goe of oil?

Some further points.

Having used the phrase “our oil” throughout the text, it appears to be a cryptic device since it works on a variety of registers. America’s oil, the country’s oil, or “our oil” works on a phonic level with the l and r substitutive with each other. Some people have difficulty learning the interval r, since both l and r are liquids. Our oil can reverse into oul oir in light of the transposability of the liquids, thus proving the word our’s proximity to oil. On the semantic level, our oil makes the phonic connection even more binding since we do believe that oil is essential to our selves, our autos, our properties, our cars, our records, stars, arts, etc.

Iran anagrammatizes into rain. Rain is from the air, whereas oil is from the ground or oils are from the soil. But Iran is in a desert where there is little rain. Oil’s difference to water is also implicated in the question whether the Persian Gulf has water, drinkable or nondrinkable, or oil within the waters of the gulf. Is the Persian Gulf made up of oil? Since, empirically, it’s saltwater, our desire believes the Persian Gulf (as in the Gulf Oil Company) to be composed of oil, an immediate explanation for its oil-rich status. But Iran and its Persian Gulf neighbors are in an arid, desert-ridden land. They only have oil and saltwater, and none of them are drinkable. America, however, has water, fresh, drinkable water in great quantities but none of the great quantities of Persian Gulf oil, made into an even greater quantity because of the equation of the gulf’s waters with the wealth of the oil near its shores. The rain or water in Iran is its oil that does not come from the air but from the ground, even in our delusion from the oil-rich Persian Gulf itself, the sea, the saltwater. Saltwater already has a mineral in it just as it could possess oil: oilwater for saltwater shows a mixture of mineral with water.

I wrote this essay during the hostage crisis in Iran. Then, in 1980, nearly every American politician ran for office. “I ran” is a conceivable phrase to have been uttered by a presidential candidate in the ‘80s elections. “I ran against Iran” forms a neat cryptophor in the narration of a campaigning ego. And that ego will have to goe far on oil in a car to assert why Iran is something he (in specular opposition) is running against. “I go” becomes the same as “I ran” (aren’t some candidates joggers, an “ I ran”?), but with Iran being the aggressively counterposed party , the I go/ego/I ran of an American presidential candidate will have to outdistance Iranian policy, a difficulty since the politics of oil make that running, going and driving a tremendous problem.

Iran’s oil anagrammatizes into the opposition no Israil. Either America gets Iran’s oil at the expense of Israil/lsrael or refuses Iran for the sake of Israel.

The Arab oil cartel is a cryptophor working against those cultures that have lots of cars but no oil. A cartel of oil rich countries makes Americans in particular angry over what will not let car(s) run on their needed fuel.

America’s president, (Jimmy) Carter, remixes into car tar, another cryptophor that would explain our current repetition of an oil-based economy. (His predecessor was car-related: Gerald Ford.) Carter/car tar cryptically advocates cars powered by tar, even though this man set up a Department of Energy. Its secretary, Mr. Schlesinger, is from the army; from the occupying forces to the question of “force” or energy in general, he is still in the same role. For force to be used against the cartel that will not let our cars goe needs someone intimate with force, energy, drives in general. If we were to “occupy” or to “besetzen” Iran, for example, it would be true to the Freudian idea of economy, the economic factor in his metapsychology. To occupy Iran is the very thing that determines occupation, Besetzung, mistranslated by James Strachey as “cathexis.” The cathexis of oil in our daily lives shows how much oil is on our minds. Our occupation with oil will lead us to occupy oil, to occupy the countries that have oil. The occupation of Iran is only the intramental equivalent of an occupation, a hyper-occupation (Überbesetzung), the same kind of energy that makes joggers and disco dancers goe so fast. James Schlesinger’s position in the Energy Department makes him the Defense Department’s chairman all over again, simply because he will advocate “occupation,” or oil, America’s energy that is now about to loose occupations, to loose peace, to loose a machinery of signs, all to countries that America has to occupy for its occupation to continue. A beaten Iran will be occupied and the beat will run on and the occupation will continue its simultaneously pleasurable and unpleasurable drive.

 

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** jay, Hi, jay! Awesome you love ‘Gendernauts’. The ‘sequel’ ‘Genderation’ is very interesting if you can manage to see it. Haneke, nice. Actually, ‘White Ribbon’ might be my favorite Haneke. Sort of an odd choice maybe, but there you go. So happy you’re into the Kristof trilogy. So, so great. And your dad is into Kristof. That’s crazy. I feel like she’s so under -known relative to her amazingness. Gold star for your dad. Super nice. Thanks, I will proceed apace and you too wth your work and play. ** _Black_Acrylic, Hope the film sits well with you. Autumny here too. Such a relief! ** Dominik, Hi and yay back!!! It’s not for sure about the German festival, but they would want us there for four days, and the festival is at the end of October, so that would kind of kill the LA Halloween. We’ll see. Dead rotting body slumped unseen over the roof of the elevator cabin? Just a guess. Love hoping that a film festival we really want to get RT into having decided to follow me on Instagram yesterday is a good sign, G. ** Carsten, Constant surprise is one of the blog’s goals in life. Pleasant surprise, mind you. LA is pretty swell year-round too, it’s true, although heat-hater me could maybe do without the July -> late October over-sunniness. Wow, Marseille? You really do like heat, don’t you? I’ll pore over the Indiewire list, but already just at a glance seeing ‘All That Jazz’ as #1 does not bode well whatsoever. And Hollis Frampton can’t get any higher than #28? Phooey. And Bresson only at #90?! Fuck them and the horse they rode in on. ** Steve, Yes, someone from Anthology just asked me to do a conversation with Treut for that, but unfortunately I don’t think I can do it. Odd dream. Death’s sneaky effect is the strangest and maybe most fascinating thing about it, as I think I already said. Extremely early on the haunt plans. First we need to see who’ll be on board to collaborate and what the location possibilities are. We can’t do much until we actually get to LA. ** Jeff J, Hey! September 1 at 4 pm my time is good. I just penned it in. Great. You were in LA! Tosh mentioned something about seeing Michael. I’m very curious to hear about that, obviously. Yes, happy with the RT rollout so far. Really excited that RT is the Official Opening Night Film at the Chicago Underground Film Festival. That’s a dream come true, and the Toronto screening soon thereafter should be great. There are some good later things happening that I can’t talk about yet. And of course the theater release in France is huge. Yes, of course about The Song Cave posts. Yes, I’d be honored. Thanks, man. ** Bill, Her films are reasonably seeable online. I guess ‘The Marbled Swarm’ is pretty squishy, but only once it gets into your mind. Ooh, find the time to build that tool, obviously. Right, the comix = squishiness incarnate. And, yeah, I see/feel that in your work. Sonically too. Do you think you’ll be able to start making that work, or I mean is the approach sufficiently cemented? ** Florian S. Fauna, Hey there, Florian! Very curious to see what you do with video. I did get ‘Eusect’ just recently, and I started reading it, and I like it a lot so far. This is a good nudge to get back into it. The illustrations are wonderful, of course! So nice to see you! ** julian, I’ve been … pretty okay, how about you? Oh, nice that my conversation with Ryan made my stuff enterable. It was so great being able to do that with him. I really, really want to go over there and visit him and the project. I have to figure that out. But, yeah, he’s a real genius. I’m totally in awe of his and Lizzie’s work. ** HaRpEr //, Rosa Von Praunheim’s work is really all over the place, but when he’s good, he’s really good. Oh, god, the wait for a reply to a submission is total hell. Obviously we’re in that with the film. And, yes, it’s shocking how many, in our case, film programmers think never responding is an acceptable way to say no. That happens all the time. I think you can submit to multiple places at once, no? Certainly with the film we do. ‘Let it Be’, the Replacements album not the worst ever Beatles song, is sublime. Kind of a perfect record. One of the times I saw The Replacements was in Amsterdam when I was living there, and they were so drunk and stoned that they played their whole set lying on their backs. Even the drummer. ** Tyler Ookami, Hi. I hope the employment has counteracting benefits, maybe even more than financially? Oh, ugh, about ‘Bring Her Back’. That’s what I was afraid of, I guess. Back-pedalled. Cool about the show. How was it? ** Darby 🐈‍⬛, Oh, shit, you’re right about the alligator. I just thought the lizard was a little chubby. ‘The Dispossessed’ … no, the name sounds familiar though. I’ll check it out. I thought you asked me about spontaneous cheese. My eyes were clearly wack last time. I have no idea what it is, but I like the concept. The pharmacy is still there, but they don’t have a big stock of things, and they don’t speak English, and whenever I go in they look at me and cringe. Patches, nice. They sound spooky. ** Nicholas., Congrats on the job interview. I’m not the hugest Tarkovsky fan, but everyone else I know is, so ‘Stalker’ is probably great, or so my friends think. Was it? I miss great Mexican food. I miss driving sometimes. I miss my friends, duh. I miss the flock of wild parrots that live in the palm tree in front of my apartment there. There are some things. Get some sleep. ** Right. Many, many years ago I made a post about ‘The Age of Oil’, but there was almost nothing about the book online at the time so the post sucked. But I checked recently, and there is slightly more about the book now, so I made a new if still inadequate post about it. You’ll probably never be able to find the book, but it’s a very eccentric and kind of amazing thing. See you tomorrow.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 DC's

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑