The blog of author Dennis Cooper

Category: Uncategorized (Page 257 of 1102)

Mechanisms

________________
‘The Turkish artist Server Demirtas has been making mechanical, robotic sculptures since the late 1990s, which he himself calls ‘mechanical fictions’. Within his work and the subjects he addresses, he often chooses to reconstruct certain repetitive actions, such as a woman looking up from a deep thought, or the postures of a sleeping child. He is interested in the emotions that these movements can evoke in the viewer. In Koro/Choir, the artist clearly chose sexually tinted actions.’ — Mad Gallery


Twins, 2019


Scramble, 2019


Koro/Choir, 2015

 

________________
Inside a white-cube gallery space (with twenty-foot ceilings), visitors find themselves immediately confronted with Michael Sailsltorfer‘s Clearing at Proyectos Monclova in Mexico City, three larger than life, upside-down trees, slowly and methodically twirling in different directions propelled by giant metal mechanical arms, like dystopian jewelry box ballerinas in an unfolding horror film of climate crisis.

 

________________
‘I stumble upon a distraught woman hunched over on the floor, her face buried deep in her hands and pink flip-flops cast aside. Her feet are worn and ragged; her clammy skin is so pale the veins peek through and is ice cold to the touch. She seizes up at my contact and the crying comes louder now, mimicking the effect of real human vulnerability. It’s only when she lifts her head I realize she’s a robot—and even then, it takes more than a few seconds to fully register: a slow realization that sends me through an emotional cyclone of empathy, sadness and fear. She is Annelies, Looking for Completion by Dutch artists (and twins) Liesbeth and Angelique Raeven, alias L.A. Raeven.’ — elephant.art

 

________________
Can’t Help Myself, by artists Sun Yuan and Peng Yu is a giant industrial robot. The neck-like machine whips around viciously and spews a reddish-brown liquid towards viewers then laboriously cleans up the mess.

 

_______________
Rectangular Rotation by interdisciplinary researcher and artist Christian Faubel is an audiovisual performance based on a modified overhead projector, the ZoOHPraxiscope. Analog robotics are used to control motors and generate movement and sound. These movements are projected and create an animated shadow play that is always in sync with the sound. In addition the projector light can be switch at hight rates, to create flickering light and cinematographic animation of rotating picture discs.

 

________________
Stelarc’s Exoskeleton (1999). A six-legged, pneumatically powered walking machine has been constructed for the body. The locomotor, with either ripple or tripod gait, moves fowards, backwards, sideways and turns on the spot. It can also squat and lift by splaying or contracting its legs. The body is positioned on a turn-table, enabling it to rotate about its axis. It has an exoskeleton on its upper body and arms. The left arm is an extended arm with pneumatic manipulator having 11 degrees-of- freedom. It is human-like in form but with additional functions. The fingers open and close , becoming multiple grippers. There is individual flexion of the fingers, with thumb and wrist rotation. The body actuates the walking machine by moving its arms. Different gestures make different motions- a translation of limb to leg motions. The body’s arms guide the choreography of the locomotor’s movements and thus compose the cacophony of pneumatic and mechanical and sensor modulated sounds….

 

________________
Chrysalis by Chico MacMurtrie is a site specific, ever-changing, interactive inflatable architectural robotic environment. This live structure was composed to respond to and inhabit the great hall of MOCA Tucson, Arizona, in 2013. It is composed of 100 inter-connecting servo controlled fabric tubes, approximating both the qualities of muscles and the structural function of bones. 16 live networks can be selectively animated by the viewers’ motion, capable of opening up the structure, creating portals and inviting the viewer inside in order to sculpt the ever changing architecture.

‘Like the biological specimen, Growing Raining Tree responds to elements in its environment and is sensitive to movement around its perimeter. As you approach the pool surrounding the Tree, its limbs slowly come to greet you. Once they reach your location, the branches pull back and begin to drip rhythmically in response to your presence. When the Tree has no visitors, it takes a willow-like resting posture.’ — Amorphic Robot Works


Growing Rain Tree


Chrysalis

 

________________
Donato Piccolo Sebastiano (Il nottambulo) (2014)
platinum latex, oil, aluminium, electric system, motors, electronics

 

________________
In Ryuya Matsui’s exhibition Flower Robotics a large group of dangling robots dance frenetically on a strobe lit dance floor. Each robot’s character is determined by analyzing an inputted voice. As a result of the analysis, those robots have sex (pitch), characters (change in volume), and conditions (change in rhythm). Those robots also affect each others’ dancing styles, creating patterns of light and sound.

 

________________
‘An art-making robot was detained on her way to show at the pyramids because Egyptian customs officials thought she was a spy. Border agents kept the robot artist Ai-Da in custody for 10 days and debated removing her eyes, which have built-in cameras. “The British ambassador has been working through the night to get Ai-Da released, but we’re right up to the wire now,” said Aidan Meller, an Oxford art dealer who is both Ai-Da’s creator and representative. “It’s really stressful.”’ — Artnet

 

________________
Rafael Lozano-hemmer‘s Wavefunction is a kinetic sculpture comprised of fifty Charles and Ray Eames moulded chairs (designed in 1948) and placed in ten rows of five chairs each, facing the entrance to the exhibition space. When someone approaches the work, a computerized surveillance system detects their presence and the closest chairs automatically begin to lift off the ground, creating the crest of a wave that then spreads over the whole room. A system of electromechanical pistons raises each chair forty centimetres from the ground. The pistons are controlled by a computer that runs the mathematics of fluid dynamics, thus making the waves interfere with each other, creating turbulence or becoming calm, just like real water.

 

________________
‘Swiss/French artist Guillaume Reymond presents a new project Transformers. This series of performances brings together different types of vehicles, gathering them according to a precise choreography, and creating what looks from the sky like gigantic robots.’ — presurfer

 

________________
In a scene reminiscent of a life drawing class, Patrick Tresset’s 5 Robots Named Paul await the human sitter. When the subject arrives he is invited to sit in an armchair, an assistant pins sheets of paper onto the robots and wakes each one up. Immediately the robots look at the sitter and start to draw, their gazes alternating between the drawing in progress and the posing human. As the model in a life drawing class, the sitter is an object of study. Immobile, yet active in keeping the pose, the human is there to inspire the machines. For the audience he is only one of the 6 silent actors of a short theatrical event. The sounds produced by the robot’s motors create an improvised soundtrack. The robots, stylised minimal obsessive artists, are only capable of drawing. Each look alike except for their eyes, either obsolete digital cameras, or webcams. Their bodies are old school desks on which the drawing paper is pinned. Their left arms, bolted on the desks and holding black biros, are only able to draw. Paul’s behaviours are based on research into the cognitive, perceptual and motor processes involved when artists draw from life, and also by the author’s drawing practice.

 

____________________
Arcangelo Sassolino Figurante (2010). Steel, bone, hydraulic system, 29 ½ x 26 3/8 x 9 1/16 inches (head)

 

____________________
In ‘colmena’ by Pascal Glissmann and Martina Höfflin, a swarm of one hundred creatures settles in the trees of the Mediterranean park upon the hills of Palma where Joan Miró used to live and find his inspiration. At the break of dawn the silent population becomes a vivid collective that assimilates sunlight into organic and chaotic sounds and movements. The hanging creatures have a solid skin made of hand-crotched isolated wire to protect their simple analogue electronic organs. These are connected to tentacles that wind up the trees to collect as much sunlight as possible. Fed by light each corpus releases a repetitive monotonous movement accompanied by a a rather technical sound. Gathered as a swarm the individual output is merged into an organic soundscape and a united motion that feels natural and merges with the environment.

 

__________________
In Wade Marynowsky’s The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie Robot (2008), the scene is this: both side walls of the gallery are lined with gramophone horns that hiss gentle static; a robot spins around the floorboards at the arrival of each new guest. Human height, its mechanism is hidden by a lace-trimmed black bustle; a single (also lace-trimmed) video camera eye beneath a plastic dome is all that ties this machine to the 21st century. At a glance it resembles the autonomous robotics experiments of Mari Velonaki’s Fish-Bird, minus the Research Council support: the machine’s erratic trajectory and myopic focus speaks of the buggy algorithms of artificial intelligence on an arts grant budget, and the tinny, canned voice sounds the routine synthesised knell of another ‘new’ media interactive.

 

_________________
Mark Pauline’s Extremely Cruel Practices, featured the downtown L.A. 1985 performance of industrial-sized killer robots and occasionally fire-breathing monstrosities, all equipped with unique destructive capacities. That August 11, 1985, public performance — the full title was actually “Extremely Cruel Practices: A Series of Events Designed to Instruct Those interested in Policies That Correct or Punish” — featured incredible post-apocalyptic death machines built by Pauline and Matt Heckert, with assistance from Eric Werner, Neal Pauline and Monte Cazazza, not to mention a team divided into groups who specialized in computer and electronics work, props and mechanical operations.

 

__________________
Max Dean & Raffaello D’Andrea Robot Chair (2006): Raffaello D’Andrea, an associate professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering at Cornell University, has created a chair in conjunction with Canadian artist Max Dean that can crumple itself into a disjointed pile of wood and then reassemble itself.

 

___________________
‘The ORLANOÏDE is a sculpture that was created especially for the Artistes & Robots exhibition at the Grand Palais. The artificial hybrid has collected social intelligence that in turn generates texts and movements. The ORLANOÏDE that resembles ORLAN questions AI and new technologies which search to rebuild, reconstruct and reinvent the human body. In this installation the robot speaks, dances and sings with ORLAN’S voice and multiplies using mirrors to create a real visual spectacle and a theatre of deep learning. The ORLANOÏDE is in dialogue with ORLAN through the use of two HD screens and three cameras and a presence sensor. ORLAN asked many people to participate in the collective intelligence by imagining questions ORLAN might ask the ORLANOÏDE In the dialogue the social intelligence of social networks is also created and ORLAN invites the public to participate by responding to the Questions of Proust on the website: ORLAN.EU.’ — ASVOF

 

___________________
Bill Vorn, Emma Howes, and Jonathan Villeneuve’s Grace State Machines is a Robotic Art performance project. The name of the project is inspired by a virtual “state of grace” that could be expressed by automatons and other finite state machines. Through this project, we want to explore the close relationship between the real physical human body and machine body. We want to express the inner perceptions of both entities and how they intertwine, blend, mingle and become blurred as they interact and exchange in an intimate dialog between the organic and the artefact. The show is a twenty-seven minute stage performance involving solely a human performer and a machine. Both are linked via a high-end motion capture system and a set of biofeedback sensors and interfaces. By monitoring the human body movements and internal states and transposing this information to the robot body, we aim to establish a dynamic and symbiotic relationship between the actors. Both eventually blend into a single organism, where flesh, bones, wires and tubes become a whole individual body. The robotic machine is built as an abstract shape and is composed of actuated sections similar to flight simulator platforms and capable of producing very complex movements. The machine will sometimes react to the performer’s body movements, sometimes move on its own behavior and induce a response from the performer. We aim to induce empathy from the viewers towards a character which is nothing more than an articulated metal structure. The strength of the simulacra is emphasized by opposing the personalities of the performer and the machine, by subverting the normal perspective of human communication.

 

___________________
‘Korean artist Choe U-Ram‘s Round Table is made up of a gigantic round table supported by 18 headless straw statues. Sculpture moves so table tilt constantly changes, preventing the ball from falling out. Whenever the sphere is close to falling, the statues towards you stand up, changing the slope and forcing the sphere’s trajectory in the opposite direction.’

 

___________________
A Los Angeles based ‘Street’ artist who uses the name XVALA has stolen teen idol Justin Bieber’s wheeley bin and created a sculpture from it titled BieberBot. The work of art has been completed with a crate commandeered from the Facebook headquarters’ cafeteria and forms a singing life-like robot of the star. It will now make its debut at an upcoming gallery exhibition in Los Angeles.

 

___________________
Andro Wekua’s Some Pheasants in Singularity featured the life-size figure of a young woman. The blonde girl, sporting a short black mesh dress and silver tennis shoes floats, ghost-like, just above the floor. But she is no spirit, she is a cyborg; one of her arms is encased in a robotic prosthesis and the other, adorned only with a sweatband, thrums against her bare thigh. Her chin rests upon a rectangle of reflective glass suspended horizontally from the ceiling, which simultaneously recalls both a childhood swing and a hangman’s noose. The eerie pallor of her face, her almost peacefully closed lids and the rhythmic thrumming of her fingers against her bare legs would almost be erotic if it weren’t so distressing. Connected by black wires to the source of her movement, a conspicuous black box, she makes a hair-raising sight.

 

____________________
Muhannad Shono worked with Factum Arte, CALiper and the Beuth Hochschule für Technik in Berlin to create ‘On Losing Meaning‘: a robot encased in plasticine-like pigment designed to enact a performance with its own body.’ — Fact Arte

 

____________________
Perched on the edge of a stage at Prada Foundation wearing a transparent PVC jacket, sits Goshka Macuga’s bearded android. Created by A-Lab in Japan, he blinks, moves his hands, and turns his head as he rehearses a monologue pieced together from excerpts of history’s greatest orations. Surrounded by a cosmos of great art from around the world that suggests a history museum rather than a contemporary institution, he is a repository of human speech for a post-human world. Like Wolfson’s installations, Macuga’s man-made man is both alluring and repellent, for though he may spout the wisdom of ages, he suggests a somewhat dystopic future where this wisdom is manipulated into demagoguery bereft of meaning.

 

________________
For Rumba I: Incubator, Cao Fei combines an automated vacuum cleaner with synthetic chicks in a kinetic sculpture.’ — Parkett

 

________________
Accomplice is a large-scale robotic installation by Petra Gemeinboeck that embeds a group of autonomous robots into the walls of the gallery. The work presents an allegory of our world as a complex machinic ecology, nestling itself into our human environment and turning it into a playground for a colony of creative, social machines.’ — GTA

 

________________
‘San Francisco artist Alan Rath, internationally recognized for his pioneering exploration of electronics as an art form, died at age 60 on October 27, 2020 after battling a rare form of multiple sclerosis for many years. Beginning in 1985, Rath made sculptures with robotics and computer-generated video animations, which he designed, machined, and programmed himself. Formally elegant and meticulously crafted, yet playful and unpredictable, his leitmotif was the relationship between the mechanical/technological and the human body and behaviors.’ — Hosfelt Gallery


Forever


Wallflower II


Again


Moist

 

________________
Mika Rottenberg‘s Ponytail (Raven) & Ponytail (Gray) (2022)  consists of two fine ponytails — one blond and one raven coloured — that protrude through holes in the wall and vigorously bounce up and down.

 

________________
‘A robot terrier named AICCA is capable of analyzing and printing art critiques thanks to AI. It was created by artist Mario Klingemann, who wants to debate the use of AI in a provocative way. “AICCA, when it comes to an art space has the capability to recognise artworks so, when it has recognised a piece, it will take a closer look and analyse it. It´ll look for forms, shapes, abstract concepts. It tries to extract all these and turn them into a text prompt. When it defecated the text, the elements and symbols that it analysed appeared, 80% of them had a lot to do with the original concept.”‘ — AP

 

 

*

p.s. RIP Terence Davies. ** Armando, Hi, pal. Really nice to see you. Yes, still editing the film. We’re in a push right now to get the film ready for a deadline this Friday. It’s all good. Oh, yeah, ‘The Illiterate’. I’m happy you read it. It seems to have slipped through the cracks. She’s major, for sure. Great, man. How are you? What’s new? ** David Ehrenstein, Nice! Actual Dusty up close and personal time. Much missed: her. ** Misanthrope, Again, so sorry. That’s rough. I wasn’t big on the first ‘Avatar’ either, duh. And I guess I’ll sit through the second one a plane at some point. People are funny. ** Darbi 🦧, Hi, D! Thanks for the warning. I ducked just in time. Not that I couldn’t use some facial scratches. No, I really loved the sculpture. Word. Cross my heart and hope to die. Your roommate sounds wretched, but don’t let her overpower your good sense. Mountains are nice. As long as you’re not too high up and feel short of breath all the time. Yeah, ‘Martin’ is really good, or I think so. Maybe Romero’s best? You should watch it again, no? Is it at your fingertips? ** _Black_Acrylic, I think you’ll like ‘Blood Feast’. What’s not to like, really. I still need to read Chris Kelso’s book. For all kinds of reasons as well figuring why Burroughs and Scotland are/were a power couple. I have no clue. ** Audrey, Hi, Audrey! Thank you for entering. Thank you so, so much for saying that. That really means so much, and I’m grateful on behalf of my work. If you feel like it, come back and tell me anything you like about you and yours. It would be a pleasure. In any case, I send you love right back. Dennis. ** T, Hi. Uh, some of the locations were on the hill, yeah, but ‘Tim’s’ house was in the suburbs somewhere. We just yesterday got hit with a fast Friday deadline and will start editing the film this morning. I’ll know better by tomorrow how much time that’s going to take. This week might be rough though. Hope not. Let’s meet up as pronto as possible if so. I’ll give you the word. ** ANGUSWAVES, Hey, man! Great to see you! Wow, awesome about the Leckey exhibition! I just saw something about that yesterday on artnet or somewhere that I will now go back and read thoroughly. That sounds totally amazing on every front! And meeting and starting to get to know the ‘big deals’. Dude, that’s so fantastic! You sound really jazzed, and that’s wonderful to hear. I’ll go look at the Turner Contemporary website post-haste. Don’t lose your troublemaking side, yeah. Great, great. I wish I could get over there to see it before it closes. But I’m beset with work on our film right now, so I don’t know. Take care. Please keep me as informed as you find it interesting to do. xo. ** Corey Heiferman, Man, I’ve thinking about you the last few days, obviously. Holy shit. I’m glad you’re okay and still watching things on your roof. It sounds intensely scary. My imagination and willpower are attempting to construct a force field around you, my friend. ** Steve Erickson, Oh, other Vollman faves would be ‘Rising Up and Rising Down’, ‘The Ice Shirt’, ‘The Royal Family’, I guess, if I were to pick and choose. You a fan/reader of his? Everyone, For Gay City News, Steve has reviewed Pedro Almodovar’s short STRANGE WAY OF LIFE here. ** Yes, RIP Terence Davies. That was sad, unexpected news. His last short is online, wow. Everyone, Before we leave Steve for today, he tips us to the fact that the great and newly departed filmmaker Terence Davies’ final short film, ‘PASSING TIME’ is available to be viewed on youtube right here. I haven’t seen it, but I highly recommend it nonetheless. ** Cody Goodnight, Hi, Cody. Oh, no problem. I totally understand busyness. Honestly, I would say your two faves are mine as well. ‘Gore Gore Girls’ is pretty fun. ‘Peeping Tom’ is amazing. So influential too. Great you watched it. I’ve read the two big Shirley Jackson books. and some stories. Yeah, I’m a real admirer too. I hope your day and night drift/fly by lustrously. ** Right. I’m giving you a bunch of machines to ‘play with’ from a distance today. Check them out. See you tomorrow.

Herschell Gordon Lewis Day *

* (Halloween countdown post #6/restored)

 

‘As a filmmaker, Herschell Gordon Lewis was a businessman above all else, and his 12-year movie career was spent either chasing or creating trends. But the one trend that he is directly responsible for — the splatter film, where Grand Guignol theater is translated to the screen for the sole purpose of allowing the viewer to ogle the dripping viscera of the human body — has endured, inspiring an entire new genre of film and breaking down the barriers of what is allowable in onscreen violence. All of Lewis’ artistic choices were made for strictly mercenary reasons, and retaining a competitive edge over Hollywood was prime consideration. In simply showing more onscreen than other filmmakers would dare, Lewis inadvertently created a monster that still stomps messily among us and influenced American culture (popular and otherwise) forever.

‘His film career began one day when he was complaining to an associate at his ad agency that the only way to make real money in the business was to shoot features. When the man asked why he just didn’t make one, Lewis realized he didn’t have an answer, and the seeds for The Prime Time were sown. Lewis produced but did not direct this inaugural project, a mildly sleazy melange of juvenile delinquency and beatnik jive, and his experiences with the film encouraged him to take the reins of further productions. He was dismayed by what he considered to be unnecessary wasting of time and resources while the picture was made, and he was determined to trim every financial corner in hopes of larger profits. He debuted as a director with Living Venus, notable primarily for introducing Harvey Korman in his first feature film role.

‘Around this time he went into partnership with David F. Friedman, an ex-carny and road show man who had the background and instincts to help exploit Lewis’ films to their utmost potential. They wasted no time in jumping into the nudie film business, producing low-budget product for display at striptease clubs. The Adventures of Lucky Pierre cost only 7,500 dollars to make and was a hit, a silly burlesque-style rip-off of Russ Meyer’s The Immoral Mr. Teas. The pair then turned to nudist colony films, one of the few ways that filmmakers could legitimately show skin in those stringent times. Their films were successful enough, but both Lewis and Friedman were hungry for something that could separate them from the rest of the pack. While watching a gangster film one night on television, Lewis noticed that a character’s bullet-riddled body barely bled, and a brainstorming session with Friedman led to a whole new genre of film.

‘While blood had been shown onscreen before in other non-Hollywood productions, no one had devised a film that would focus directly on the carnage, with scene after scene of graphic, stomach-churning mayhem as the sole point of the show. The gimmick was something that might give the filmmakers an edge over their competition. After wrapping up their nudist colony epic Bell, Bare and Beautiful, the two were inspired by the Egyptian facade of the hotel they were staying at and developed a script on the spot about a sinister caterer who collects body parts for use at a feast designed to raise an ancient Egyptian goddess from the dead. Blood Feast was completed in two days and was a hit in 1963, filling drive-ins and outraging decent citizens. Lewis and Friedman had found their cash cow and were determined to milk it.

‘They would continue down the exploitation path with 2000 Maniacs, Color Me Blood Red, Alley Tramp, Monster a Go-Go!, Sin, Suffer and Repent, and Moonshine Mountain, and even tried his hand at two children’s films: Jimmy, the Boy Wonder and The Magic Land of Mother Goose. Lewis explored a number of exploitation subjects in the latter half of the 1960s, usually following proven trends in an effort to strike while the iron was hot. She-Devils on Wheels arrived early in the popular surge of motorcycle action dramas, while Blast Off Girls was a belated attempt to exploit rock & roll. Suburban Roulette was an uncharacteristically tame story of wife swapping, and Something Weird’s plot included LSD use along with witchcraft and extra sensory perception.

‘While Lewis may have been playing the field, he hadn’t given up on the gore genre completely. The bizarre horror comedy The Gruesome Twosome arrived in 1967, as did his lengthy vampire epic A Taste of Blood. But his final two horror features helped cement his legacy as the creator of gore films with an enthusiastic exclamation point. 1970’s The Wizard of Gore is a surrealistic, confounding tale of a mysterious magician who uses sleight of hand and mind control to physically tear his victims limb from limb. Even more grotesque, though, was The Gore Gore Girls (1972), a jaw-droppingly tasteless nudie-horror-comedy that found Lewis outdoing every outrage he had ever perpetrated on the audience. While the effects remained as cheap as ever, the audacious brutality and mutilations (set against corny humor and an inappropriately jolly musical score) earned The Gore Gore Girls the first X rating given solely for violence.

‘The film turned out to be the voluntary end of Lewis’ movie career. He had kept his advertising agency throughout his filmmaking years and it was flourishing, as was his expertise with copywriting. Finding it harder to outdo his fellow exploiteers as well as the more liberal Hollywood features of the time, he gave up the grind and went on to a very successful career in direct mail marketing and copywriting; indeed, the instructional tomes he’s produced on the subjects are considered essential reading for many professionals. Lewis ended up losing the rights to his films after putting them up as collateral for a car rental business venture that failed. He didn’t mourn, thinking that they weren’t worth much, but when home video exploded in the 1980s, Blood Feast found a whole new bloodthirsty audience, and as the years have progressed, Lewis’ films are more popular than ever. After years of musing over returning to the slasher genre he created, Lewis finally began production for Blood Feast 2 in 2001.

‘Herschell Gordon Lewis has never regarded himself as a great filmmaker, and it isn’t false modesty on his part that prevents him from making such a claim. His interest in a motion picture career was predicated solely on making money, something that he has always cheerfully admitted. Whether or not he succeeded to the extent that he desired is only for him to decide, but one thing is for certain, his work opened up avenues for a legion of hucksters and con artists to make millions off the cruel desires and tasteless urges of audiences.’ — Fred Beldin

 

___
Stills







































































 

_____
Further

Herschell Gordon Lewis Official Site
HGL @ IMDb
‘The Cinema of Herschell Gordon Lewis’
‘Why the Godfather of Gore came to Calgary to make his latest film
Download HGL’s films @ Something Weird
Review: ‘The Eye Popping Sounds of Herschel Gordon Lewis’
‘Herschell Gordon Lewis Returns with Anthology “BloodMania”‘
‘Splatter auteur Herschell Gordon Lewis: “I’m no artist”‘
‘Herschell Gordon Lewis and the Corpse Reviver Shot’
‘Scum of the Earth – 7 Herschell Gordon Lewis Films’
‘Herschell Gordon Lewis: The Godfather of Gore’ @ Slant
‘Well, life is full of surprises. For all of us.’
‘Herschell Gordon Lewis may not be one of the two greatest filmmakers of all time’
‘Gore Pioneer Herschell Gordon Lewis Gets His Due’
‘Dream – Herschell Gordon Lewis’ @ Arte
‘Herschell Gordon Lewis: Exploitation with a goblet of gore’
‘Master Of More Than Gore’
‘Bad Biology and Herschell Gordon Lewis’

 

____
Extras


Trailer: ‘Herschell Gordon Lewis: The Godfather of Gore’


THE LOST FILMS OF HERSCHELL GORDON LEWIS


The Eye Popping Sounds of Herschell Gordon Lewis


Herschell Gordon Lewis’s Holiday Marketing Tip

 

_______
Interview
from Bright Lights Film Journal

 

Your background in academics was quite different from that of your partner David Friedman. Was this difference an advantage in that it allowed for two widely differing viewpoints, as far as how to market or sell a film?
The disparity of backgrounds was a heavy asset. I brought a sophisticated knowledge of advertising and communications; Dave Friedman brought a carnival barker knowledge of how to motivate people. The combination worked, and we learned from each other.

Did you ever think when you were making the now classic Blood Feast and Two Thousand Maniacs that future filmmakers, not only those in the exploitation market, would cite your films as being influential?
I hadn’t anticipated being a footnote to motion picture history. I did realize we were producing a film of a type no one had produced before. The question was: Would any theatre play it?

Was there a particular film or even a particular scene in one of your films that really outraged the public and incurred the wrath of decency groups?
The infamous tongue scene in Blood Feast was the watershed gore scene.

Did it surprise you or does it surprise you when certain films, novels, or artworks come under fire from decency groups for containing what they consider to be extreme violence?
Decency groups don’t bother me as long as they proselytize their own followers. When they try strong-arm tactics in the mainstream, I’m very much opposed.

What did you think of the gore films of the mid-1970s and 1980s that came after Blood Feast and Two Thousand Maniacs?
Most of the follow-up films were formulaic. I don’t sense a great deal of difference among the various Halloweens and Amityvilles and Screams, although certainly their effects far transcend any I was able to include.

Was the dialogue in your films improvised or was there always a complete script that you adhered to?
After Blood Feast the films were scripted. This was self-protection to assure minimal film wastage.

When looking back to your films, are you ever surprised that you were ale to get so much from relatively small budgets?
I’m not at all surprised that I could get so much from a small budget. My rules were absolute: 1. Don’t shoot a rehearsal. 2. Make do. 3. Don’t quit for the day until you’ve shot every scheduled scene.

Did the small budgets inspire you to become more creative in the setting up of scenes, camerawork, special effects, etc.?
Yes, small budgets were the driver, forcing us to substitute imagination for dollar expenditure.

Does it surprise you when serious, or if you want to use the word “highbrow,” film journals such as Cahiers du Cinema discuss or profile your career and your films?
I once was nonplussed that serious publications took my work seriously. I no longer am, because I see the profound effect our early films had on film production.

Do you see filmmaking as an artform, as something to be taken seriously?
I see filmmaking as a business and pity anyone who regards it as an artform and spends money based on that immature philosophy.

Do you think that all works of art must contain exploitation elements?
Art is in the eye of the beholder. It isn’t necessary for all art to include exploitation materials, but certainly it’s necessary to include devices that seize and control attention from the target-group the artist is trying to reach.

How do you think the independent film market has changed since the days when you were an independent? Has it changed for the better?
The independent film market no longer exists. The industry is an Arabian bazaar, with nonaffiliated producers clamoring for attention along with the major studios. The successful independent invariably sells his/her product to a major company or direct to cable.

Just For the Hell of It (1968) is considered to be one of the most disturbing and violent juvenile delinquent films ever made, two years before Clockwork Orange was released. Were comparisons ever made between the two, and what did you think of A Clockwork Orange?
I never have drawn a parallel between Just For the Hell of It and A Clockwork Orange. Many feel A Clockwork Orange is pompous and obscure; I don’t…and I love Beethoven’s music.

A number of your films contain the theme or subject of psychic phenomena as well as witchcraft and magic or what you might term occult subjects. Are these subjects that are of interest to you?
I’m mildly interested in psychic phenomena but am no fanatic. I’d be delighted if some sort of proof ever came to light.

Who are some of your favorite directors? And what are some of your favorite films?
I admire the Coen Brothers and like just about every film they’ve made.

In films like Color Me Blood Red (1965) and even The Adventures of Lucky Pierre (1961), you poke fun at the pretensions of art and the world of art. Are you suspicious of the intentions of filmmakers who try to package exploitation as art?
I think I’ve answered that question. Yes, I’m suspicious of filmmakers who regard themselves as artists and auteurs.

How did you respond to critics who viewed your films as bizarre, either in content or style?
I don’t regard having a film called “bizarre” as an insult. If a critic offers that comment, I’d thank him for it.

 

___________________
16 of Herschell Gordon Lewis’s 38 films

______________
Blood Feast (1963)
‘Groundbreaking in so many evil ways, Blood Feast is the simple tale of an insane Miami resident who kills women in putrid manners, in hopes of resurrecting an Egyptian goddess. Yes, it’s a load of narrative malarkey, yet Lewis’ one-note flick is charmingly despicable. It took some major balls to make a gross-out of this kind back in ’63, and Blood Feast doesn’t shy away from its vileness; the film’s most memorable (for all the wrong reasons) image is that of the antagonist pulling a hot blonde’s tongue right out of her throat. It’s a moment akin to the moon landing for gore-hounds.’ — Complex


Trailer


the entire film

 

______________
Scum of the Earth (1963)
‘The film truly belongs to Lawrence Wood, who plays Mr. Lang with such an insane joy that it’s impossible not to root for the sleazy old pornographer. Whether he’s giggling as a toy monkey somersaults across his desk or he’s politely explaining why nothing is actually his fault, Wood appears to be having such a good time that it’s just infectious. Wood’s best moment comes when Kim expresses some reluctance about modeling for more pictures and suddenly, Mr. Lang starts to shout at her about how she (and all the other kids) are hypocrites. “You’re damaged merchandise and this is a fire sale!” he shouts as sweat streams down his face and Lewis zooms in for a close up of his mouth, “You’ll do what I tell ya!” Wood screams, “Do you hear!?” It’s a scene of lunatic genius that, in the best tradition of both Herschell Gordon Lewis and the grindhouse in general, comes out of nowhere and is all the more effective because of it.’ — unobtainium13.com


Trailer


Excerpt

 

________________
Two Thousand Maniacs! (1964)
‘While Two Thousand Maniacs! may not be as rudely in-your-face as Blood Feast, it is a much more accomplished and effective picture, one which still has the power to make first-time viewers squirm uncomfortably in their seats. Essentially a macabre version of Brigadoon, Two Thousand Maniacs! sees the southern residents of Pleasant Valley seeking vengeance for Civil War atrocities by capturing two carloads of northerners and subjecting them to a variety of ingenious and stomach-turning tortures. Among the grisly highlights are a blonde sexpot (SHELBY LIVINGSTON) having her thumb sliced off by a muscle-bound hayseed, after which the demented townsfolk treat her wound by chopping off her entire arm! While her arm is being served up as barbecue(!), her husband JEROME EDEN is liquored up with moonshine, then drawn and quartered by four horses which gallop off in different directions.’ — Something Weird


Trailer

the entire film

 

________________
Monster a-Go Go (1965)
‘Director Herschell Gordon Lewis needed another movie to round out a double-feature with Moonshine Mountain. So he bought Bill (The Giant Spider Invasion) Rebane’s unfinished Terror at Halfday, added a couple of extra scenes, some new dialogue, some narration, and voila – Monster A Go-Go was born. The plot, such as it is, is that an astronaut has gone missing after crash-landing in suburban Illinois. At the same time, a monster that looks suspiciously like the lost spaceman (and is highly radioactive) has been terrorizing teenagers and scaring the pants off of the locals. Scientists work to study the monster, but he escapes into the Chicago sewers, only to disappear suddenly.’ — tvtropes.org


Excerpt


the entire film

 

_______________
Color Me Blood Red (1965)
‘Though Color Me Blood Red is the least discussed of Herschell Gordon Lewis’s unofficial “Blood Trilogy” (which also includes Blood Feast and Two Thousand Maniacs), it’s probably my favourite. It’s lighter on gore, but there’s hardly any boring filler, its concept is great (a mad artist using blood for paint), and it’s hysterical (sometimes intentionally, other times unintentionally). Best of all is its lead actor. Gordon Oas-Heim gives an outrageous performance as loony painter Adam Sorg. He shouts his way through the film with Zach Galifianakis-esque outbursts, bugged out eyes, and a sweaty forehead. He’s a wonderful thing to watch.’ — Dave Jackson


Trailer


the entire film

 

_____________
Something Weird (1967)
‘Between the Blood Trilogy and 1970’s The Wizard of Gore, director Herschell Gordon Lewis explored a wide variety of themes outside the hard-gore arena while continuing to court viewers with the sensational and the exploitable. One of his most unusual offerings of this period was this category-defying tale from 1967. It would be too easy to simply suggest that Something Weird lives up to its title. What’s truly remarkable is that this exploration of psychic phenomena, criminology, drug therapy, and the supernatural actually manages to remain coherent throughout its running time! The concept began as a script by producer James F. Hurley, who later complained that director Lewis had compromised his serious vision. (Interestingly, Hurley’s original intent was reflected in his own subsequent film The Psychic in 1968, which utilized Lewis as cameraman. Viewing this film, one can see immediately why Lewis felt the story needed some “juicing up.”)’ — images journal.com


Trailer

 

_______________
A Taste of Blood (1967)
‘Herschell Gordon Lewis is one of my favourite directors and this was a huge let down for me. The master of gore became the master of bore in this retelling of Dracula. The pacing of this film is incredibly slow. There are many continuity errors including a chase scene where at one moment it’s midday and then suddenly it’s night and back to midday…and back to night. I thought I missed something at first and went back but no. Each scene is drawn out. A lot. I had to hold myself back from skipping through scenes. It could have easily been 40 minutes shorter. I will give him credit for trying something different from what he normally does. I think that’s important in any craft…sometimes it doesn’t work out. Skip it if you’re not a fan of HGL though.’ — Nikola Night


Trailer


the entire film

 

_________________
The Gruesome Twosome (1967)
‘This 1967 Herschell Gordon Lewis feature has the unique distinction of having one of the most bizarre openings in low-budget horror cinema history. After editing, the film was short in length. As filler, Lewis added two wig blocks with construction paper faces talking to each other during the opening. One of the wig blocks is stabbed as blood gushes out everywhere. Even after inserting this opening sequence, the film only runs 72 minutes. Crazy Mrs. Pringle and her mentally challenged son Rodney run a wig shop near a Florida college campus. The wigs are advertised as 100 percent real human hair. The shop also rents vacant rooms to college co-eds. The renting of rooms is only a disguise for Pringle to lure young women to the shop so Rodney can scalp and murder them.’ — Plan 9 Crunch


Trailer

Watch the film here

 

________________
The Girl, the Body, and the Pill (1967)
‘Always in search of uncharted exploitation territory, Lewis turns his attention this time to the then-controversial topic of birth control. Given the nature of the film, it is surprising that it contains practically no overt sexual situations beyond a couple suggestive dissolves. One of Lewis’s more multifaceted productions, The Girl, the Body, and the Pill follows the subject through multiple perspectives. We see a liberal high school teacher (Pamela Rhea) advocating for sex education as a means of promoting proper hygiene among her rapidly developing adolescent students. Her efforts to promote planned parenthood meet with fierce opposition from the school board as well as the parents of several of the students. Actually, one parent in particular, the hyperprotective puritanical father (Bill Rogers) of a virginal daughter whose boyfriend wants to go all the way, is the loudest voice to oppose such education. The film additionally follows the exploits of the school’s most promiscuous student, Randy (Nancy Lee Noble), and that of her considerably more promiscuous single mother(Valedia Hill).’ — Wikipedia


Trailer


Excerpt

 

_______________
Blast-Off Girls (1967)
‘Sleazy music promoter Boojie Baker convinces a pop band to come work for him. He arranges play dates, publicity, record contracts, and the band’s loyalty by getting his hired girls to exercise their feminine charms on all who stand in his way. Thus he creates the new music sensation, The Big Blast, but the band is unhappy about Boojie keeping most of the money. When they try to leave, Boojie sets them up for trouble with the law, but offers to bail them out if they sign the contract. Can’t anyone stop this scum bucket?’ — letterboxd.com


Trailer



the entire film

 

__________________
She-Devils on Wheels (1968)
‘1968 saw no less than nine feature films from the prolific Herschell Gordon Lewis. Without a doubt, the best-remembered of the batch was this innovative girl gang mini-epic. Lewis didn’t invent the biker film, but the female “Man-Eaters” of She-Devils on Wheels (written by Louise Downe) were the first of their kind. The Man-Eaters live up to their name in all but the most literal fashion. Led by Queen (Betty Connell) and the huge, poetically-inclined Whitey (Pat Poston), they’re the terror of their community. To them, men are cattle–to be chosen from “stud lines” at their whim and to be tossed aside after use. Young initiate Honeypot (Nancy Lee Noble), however, hasn’t quite got the idea; she tends to stick to one particular “stud.” A challenge is set to the candidate: she’ll become a full-fledged Man-Eater once she proves her loyalty by dragging the beaten body of her beau from the back of her own motorcycle!’ — images journal.com


Trailer


the entire film

 

_______________
Just for the Hell of It (1968)
‘Hear the name Herschell Gordon Lewis, and you may picture in your mind’s eye gouts of blood and gore, intestines being dangled in front of the screen and the somewhat dubious acting skills of playmate Connie Mason. There’s a non-gore stream to the directing output of the man though, and although there is some blood right towards the end of the film, Just for the Hell of it eschews the trademark gore for the most part. What we have here is a foray into nihilistic morality and hippy-beatnik violence, which ends on quite a surprising note for a film made nearly forty years ago. For those of you with a penchant for vintage exploitation, you can do a lot worse than Just for the Hell of it. Aside from any thematic concerns, you’ve got the great sixties decor, clothes and soundtrack. After these surface thrills you can appreciate the pretty confronting violence and themes. Lewis has crafted a fairly potent essay on mindless evil, despite the sometimes clunky performances and low budget.’ — Girls Guns and Ghouls


Trailer


Excerpt

 

________________
The Wizard of Gore (1970)
‘What WIZARD OF GORE does differently than most other magic films, especially of its time, is introduce popular technology into its trickery. The titular wizard, Montag, doesn’t only mesmerize his theater audiences but those viewing at home as well, with Lewis perhaps boldly starting a ‘fear of TV’ trend that would fully manifest in later features like NETWORK (1976) and VIDEODROME (1983). That the various slayings in the film also take place in the home rather than on the stage as they appear to – or do they? – root this almost firmly in the type of home invasion/slasher feature that would become popularized in 1978 with HALLOWEEN. What Lewis’s film may lack in subtlety it makes up for in blurring lines that were already blurry in the first place. The real spectacle isn’t all of the young women being dissected on screen and covered in – what was rumored to be – sheep guts, it is in Montag’s speeches about what we don’t know and can’t begin to figure out.’ — Brattle Blog


Trailer

the entire film

 

________________
The Gore Gore Girls (1972)
The Gore Gore Girls stands alone in the Lewis repertoire in several ways. Though no stranger to sex and nudity in his non-horror work, the director had always kept these elements a safe distance from his gore films, feeling such a blend was too risky even for him. But competition had upped the ante, so the move was finally made here (Lewis remembers less nudity than the film actually contains, incidentally). The combination of sick gore and sick humor remains as potent today as ever. Many viewers (including some horror fans) still find it unwatchable. Even Something Weird owner Mike Vraney (in his audio commentary interview with Lewis, where he’s joined once again by Jimmy Maslin of Shock Films) admits his discomfort with the film’s most extreme sequence. Lewis is neither defensive nor apologetic: he made the film, he states, for adults only; and for that matter, for adults who possessed a certain sick sense of humor. No attempt was ever made to disguise the nature of the film, and the idea that anyone would take it seriously is simply bewildering to the director. This was an attempt to once again out-“gross” what anyone else was doing; and it unquestionably delivered the goods.’ — images journal.com


Trailer

 

___________________
Blood Feast 2: All U Can Eat (2002)
‘Thirty-nine years after making his groundbreaking independent horror film Blood Feast, director Herschell Gordon Lewis returns with a sequel. This time around, Faud Ramses III (J.P. Delahoussaye) , the grandson of Blood Feast’s protagonist, moves into his granddad’s catering shop. It isn’t long before Faud proves to be a chip off the old block, as he lures buxom young women into his lair and carves them up for sandwiches. Nobody ever has, nor could, accuse H.G. Lewis of being a genuinely good filmmaker – his career is built on lower-than-B-grade trash after all, but similar to the likes of Lloyd Kaufman, his movies must be viewed using a wholly different set of expectations than critical standard. In this sense, Blood Feast 2 is a raging success. Not only is it excessively gory (sickly, even, in parts), but it’s also legitimately funny. Visually, it looks cheap and uninspired – Lewis employs no glitzy camera tricks, displays no directorial flair, and blocks as easily as possible for an obviously quick shooting schedule. Again, being an H.G. Lewis film this is something to be expected, alongside lingering close-ups of the extreme mutilation conducted during the kill scenes and uniformly hammy acting from the cast.’ — dreadcentral.com


Trailer

 

_______________
The Uh-oh Show (2009)
‘Originally conceived under the title of Grim Fairy Tales, The Uh-Oh Show! is gore and exploitation legend Herschell Gordon Lewis’s minimally scary second film of the new millennium. While his previous film was a sequel to arguably his most famous work, Blood Feast, this one’s a completely original idea. It blends his usual trademark extreme, absurd gore with light satire on reality TV and pop culture. The most important thing this horror comedy makes clear is that the man has not lost his sense of humor and fun in the slightest nor has he forgotten how to sling blood around or hack off body parts.’ — best-horror-movies.com


Trailer


THE UH OH SHOW Movie Review

 

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** Misanthrope, Me? Awww. Well, the two ‘Avatar’ movies are in the top three all-time highest grossing movies list, so go figure. Zac’s and my new film has a swamp with fake alligators and fog machines, you’ll love it. I’m so sorry to hear about the Neo-Decadent writer. I don’t know his work, but I’ll go look it up. That’s really sad. Hugs, George. ** David Ehrenstein, As you well should. I saw Dusty Springfield lip-synch three songs at a scarcely populated gay bar on La Brea, I think called Pulse, in he early 80s when she was at her nadir before the Pet Shop Boys rescued her. It was pretty depressing, but I’m glad I got to see her. ** _Black_Acrylic, Hi, Ben. Wonderful about the class. I’m very excited that you’re back to writing, and of course I’ll be greatly looking forward to the results. ** T, Hi. Me too, now that you mention it. Cherbourg! Hometown of ‘PGL’! Next week will probably be fine. We have work to do, but I don’ think we’ll be marathoning. Hit me up when you’re back and know your sched for the duration. And enjoy the sea and gulls. Have a rugby-unimpaired weekend. ** Corey Heiferman, Hi. The Vollman book I spotlit yesterday isn’t so complicated if you want to start him smoothly. ‘Miracle’ is great, obviously. My fave Genet is ‘Funeral Rites’. Is Genet doing anything for you? Yes, we are forced to play that game. And the world premiere game most immediately. I do really hate how hierarchical the film world’s rollout system is. But, for now, we’re in the game, I guess. My weekend? Mm, see if I can get into a sold-out performance (by Jonathan Capedevielle, former Gisele Vienne superstar) tonight. Fiddle with some fiction. Plan out next week’s film work. Try to decomplicate a complication. Stuff like that there. April is as good a time to visit Paris as any other, for sure. It’s always great here except for during heatwaves, and even then it’s still pretty good. So the answer is yes, and an enthusiastic yes even. Enjoy your differently configured weekend. ** Steve Erickson, Timmy’s stans are getting what they deserve, sorry. Yes, I just saw that about the remix! So cool! I’ll get it and the EP this weekend. Everyone, Big double header treat. Novelist and longtime d.l. Jeff Jackson has a band called Julian Calendar, as you might know. They have a new EP out, and if that’s not good enough, the writer/ critic/ filmmaker/ composer Steve Erickson has a remix of one of the songs on said EP that he, in his own words, ‘radically reworked, influenced by both ambient and industrial music’. Must get, you surely must agree. The EP is called ‘Swimming Lessons’, and it’s right here. Spooky about band camp. Its destruction would be world destroying. My weekend’s plans were vaguely detailed by default to Corey up above. Nothing too anticipatory, at this point anyway. Enjoy yours. ** 2Moody, Hi. Vollman is very prolific, maybe too prolific, but that spotlit one is a keeper. I don’t remember my haunts having a particular overall theme. Just a scattershot of ‘scary’ motifs and things. The highlight was that we had a big walk-in, refrigerated meat locker in our basement, and the haunt ended with me in costume leading visitors close to it then shoving them inside, slamming the door shut, and forcing them to stay in the freezing pitch-black there for a couple of minutes. Nowadays I would be taken to court multiple times if I tried that. I should say that my family wasn’t involved. They didn’t like I was inviting strangers into our house. I’ve kind of sworn off writing non-fiction, but I do wish someone would write that book. I would be willing to be an advisor or something. Nice camping tidbit. Scary too. For me. Yes, your friends are freaks. I’m a million percent in agreement with you. Well, there are a wad of Lewis films in toto right up there if you wish. I think you know what to expect. May sublimity take a quick swipe at me and then head over and smother you this weekend. ** Okay. What can you say about Herschell Gordon Lewis. I would say that if you were to compare horror movies to, say, haunted house attractions, ‘The Nun 2’ and its many brethren would be the Universal Horror Nights, and HGL’s films would be the homely, well meaning home haunts. Which is obviously a compliment coming from me. Anyway, I restored HGL’s Day as the next in my series of Halloween gifts to y’all. See you on Monday.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 DC's

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑