The blog of author Dennis Cooper

Category: Uncategorized (Page 10 of 1102)

Spotlight on … Duncan Smith The Age of Oil (1986)

 

‘The near invisibility, online as well as off, of writer Duncan Smith (1954-1991) is a stark reminder of how thoroughly information can go missing, or never emerge at all. The barely visible traces left by Smith, who published little during his lifetime, can be easily and briefly enumerated: The Age of Oil, his 1987 book of essays, long out of print and extremely rare; a few articles in the back issues of Flash Art, Artforum, Semiotext(e) and Art & Text (most of which were reprinted in The Age of Oil); a catalogue essay for a show of graffiti art at a Munich gallery; a contribution to a book on painter Alain Jacquet, and the text (partly co-authored with Diego Cortez) for a book of photographs of Elvis Presley during his Army years in Germany. The only examples of his writing currently online are two brief essays and his translation of a text by Friedrich Schlegel on the website of Bomb Magazine, which published him while he was alive.

‘Oddly, Smith may be best known not for his writing but for his appearance in Eric Mitchell’s film Kidnapped (1978), an hour-long Super-8 document of No Wave Cinema viewable on YouTube. Yet even here his presence is elusive. The author of a recent article on Kidnapped is at a loss to identify Smith beyond his name: “It’s a hangout movie with Mitchell, actress and No Wave fixture Patti Astor, Mudd Club co-founder and James Chance (of The Contortions) manager Anya Phillips, Teenage Jesus and the Jerks bass player Gordon Stevenson, and the mysterious Duncan Smith.” In other discussions of Kidnapped and the downtown scene, people who are apparently unfamiliar with his writings often misidentify Smith as an artist.

‘None of this would be worth commenting on—after all, history, even recent history, is full of forgotten authors, obscure bohemians and marginal cultural figures—were it not for the fact that Smith was a writer and theorist of striking originality. Valuable in their own right, his experiments with language paralleled and very likely influenced the work of important visual artists of the 1980s. Smith was also a candid chronicler of New York City gay life, pre and post AIDS, and a sharp-eyed observer of American popular culture. Wielding a self-invented style that pushed the strategies of post-structuralism into the realm of experimental literature, Smith mined Freud, Lacan and Derrida to pursue his own obsessive theories of language and society. Beginning in the late 1970s, long before Chris Kraus’s I Love Dick, he dared to mix confession and critical theory in a radical manner that is as close to his literary contemporaries such as Kathy Acker as to any postmodern art theorist.

‘Typically, Smith’s essays begin with a fragment extracted from everyday existence—a common phrase, an object, an encounter—which he then subjects to a series of variations and deformations that draw on classical rhetoric and psychoanalysis. The departure point for “Reflection on Rhetoric in Bars” is Smith and a friend being pushed out of a bar at closing time. “Why Diamonds Are a Girl’s Best Friend” unpacks the clichéd phrase of the title. The brief text “On Wit” meditates on the significance of the popping of a champagne cork.” Smith’s most favored source, however, is the entertainment industry. The first essay in The Age of Oil, for instance, offers an explanation of Elvis Presley’s propensity to give away expensive cars, which Smith traces back to the singer’s obsession with his mother and his twin brother who died at birth. As in much of Smith’s writing, “An Interpretation of Elvis’s Car Giving” hinges on proper names, and frequently resorts to italics. …

‘Over the next three and a half pages—this is one of his shorter pieces—we learn how the name “Cadillac” can be read as “a virtual rebus of events in Elvis’s life” as Smith uses the brand’s three syllables (“cad” “ill” and “lac”) to uncover the rock ‘n’ roller’s hidden motivations. Elvis’s choice of Cadillacs as gifts is, in Smith’s account, over-determined. His mother, it appears, fell in love with Cadillacs when she saw a “fine lady” drive up to a hospital in one. “This very hospital,” Smith observes, “with its doctors and sophisticated medical technology could have relieved her of the death of Jesse Garon.” With his first paycheck from Colonel Parker, Elvis bought his mother a Cadillac, a car whose name, says Smith, “echoes the name Garon whose bereavement would last all the Presleys’ lives.” For Elvis, Smith speculates, the first syllable of “Cadillac” mirrors his propensity for misbehaving, sparked by his guilt for being the surviving twin: “With cad one is first struck by the association with a cad, a bad boy, a jilter. The radical innocence of a dead infant perpetually stipulated that the evils of Elvis would prove him a cad, a bad boy.” After spinning phrases around “ill” and “lac” Smith arrives, in the penultimate paragraph, at the word “car”: “This car was made possible by Colonel Parker’s deal with RCA, Elvis’s new record company. Car and RCA are anagrams. The car/Cadillac was also the RCA/Cadillac that would be able to buy his mother gifts that filled the lack of Garon.” …

‘There is so much more to be said about Duncan Smith, both his writings and his place in and influence on the New York artworld. I haven’t mentioned his activity as a poet, nor his involvement with the music scene, nor even touched on Days in the Clouds, an unpublished collection of his essays from 1987 to 1991 in which he writes at length, and heartbreakingly, about his battle with AIDS, his experiences as a gay man in New York, and his departure from the city, initially for Cornell to work on his Ph.D, then to Portland, Oregon, where he died. For now, more than a quarter century after his death, it is perhaps enough to break, if only slightly, the silence that has far too long enveloped him and his writing.’ — Raphael Rubinstein

 

_____
Further

Duncan Smith by Raphael Rubinstein
Everybody Wants Exposure by Duncan Smith
Schlegel on Wit by Duncan Smith
Why Diamonds Are a Girl’s Best Friend by Duncan Smith
Private Elvis, Edited by Diego Cortez with text by Duncan Smith, 1978.
‘The Age of Oil’ @ goodreads
‘The Age of Oil’ is out of print, but …

 

____
Extra


Kidnapped [Eric Mitchell, 1978] Featuring Duncan Smith, Patti Astor, Anya Phillips, Gordon Stevenson.

 

___
Book

Duncan Smith The Age of Oil
Slate Press

‘A key figure in the Downtown art, film and music scenes of the late 1970s and early 1980s, Smith, who died of AIDS in 1991, forged a unique style, a distinctive interpretative apparatus, that pushed techniques borrowed from psychoanalysis and post-structuralism into the realm of avant-garde writing. He was also—though not in this particular essay—a memoirist of heartbreaking effect. In his brief life (he was 36 when he died), Smith had a significant though as yet unacknowledged influence on the course of contemporary art, most notably via dialogues with his friends Jean-Michel Basquiat and Rammellezee, whose art is pervaded by radical wordplay very close to Smith’s); his own work, beyond his writings, includes collages, collaborative projects such as an unpublished photo-text book about the movie Sunset Boulevard created with artist Seth Tillett, and roles in legendary underground films such as Eric Mitchell’s Kidnapped and Underground USA.’ — Raphael Rubinstein

 

______
Excerpt

from On the Current Symbolic Status of Oil

Cars, as everyone knows, are powered by oil, a condition that powerful interests have aligned Western countries, America in particular, to for many decades. Oil is the law for a car’s operation, and the law, or as the French would say, la loi, is oil. The loi/law of oil is thus necessary for the American car to go anywhere. And where will the ego goe without oil, without a car? Heretofore the loi has always been cars driven by oil. This is witnessed by the failure of steam driven and electrically powered cars to have any success on the internal combustion machine market, the present-day oil powered cars made in Detroit. Without the loi of oil (conditioned by car companies and oil companies), there would be the likehood of no oil, no oil for egos to goe on. This is the supreme threat to America’s ego for without it nothing will goe, unless America’s interests liquidate the aggressive, oil-hoarding counterpart. Goe over there…

Within the car there is a radio, and within the word car there is the anagram RCA. Originally a company aligned to the technical innovation of transmitting sound over distances, RCA became equatable with the radio. And nearly every car has a radio or RCA (letterally) within it.

Cars and radios are thus in intimate connection, rhetorically a metonymic one. What is interesting is that cars are powered by oil just as radios, in association, are powered by oil. Both are in conjunction with oil, cars burn oil while radios play oil, that is, records, made of oil or vinyl, are played over the apparatus of a radio. The car that burns oil reproduces the radio that plays oil, here records, an oil-derived product. Even the word radio has two essential letters for car.

Again without oil our cars or RCA could not goe. The loss of oil to power our cars is as threatening as the loss of oil/vinyl/records for our RCA, our popular music, played over the car radio, the radio cryptically echoing the car it is contained in. We hear the radio with our cars, noting another similarity between car and ear. Ears hear the car radio. Also, ear is within hear. Since we have ended up identifying with our cars so much, we’ve also ended up identifying with the stars our ears hear, our popular musicians heard on music stations over the radio. Elvis Presley loved cars, which is inevitable since he was signed over to the record company RCA. America loves cars and loves to hear Elvis Presley. The lack of oil will then make loving cars and hearing rock stars an impossibility (since their voices are on an oil/vinyl record).

Ears have wax in them. Wax too is synonymous with oil, as demonstrated by the title for a hit record called Hot Wax, now transformable into Hot Oil. There is already oil in our ears, the wax, enforced by the idea that there is oil in our cars, in our radios. To be close to the music played over the radio seems to be a condition we have already met up with because the wax/oil makes the distantly playing record much more interior and proximate. Popular music resolves this distance by using words in songs that are exchangeable with its listeners. We then presume the sung material to be our very own, our “feelings.” Singing the record to oneself is an introjection, an interiorization of the distant singer. The singer is brought closer to ourselves, just as the unconscious idea is one of already possessing that record inside our ears, but as ear wax or ear oil.

Around the time that cars and radios were assuming their egological power over American citizens, UFO’s were being cited in great numbers. You could surmise this bit of common knowledge to be widespread around the beginning of the 1950s, the beginning of a wide scale introjection of records played on car radios. UFO’s, or flying saucers, were also often cited from people’s ears. Around the time that cars and radios were assuming their egological power over American citizens, UFO’s were being cited in great numbers. You could surmise this bit of common knowledge to be widespread around the beginning of the 1950s, the beginning of a wide scale introjection of records played on car radios. UFO’s, or flying saucers, were also often cited from people’s ears. I’ll venture a correspondence that might illuminate these mutual car/radio/UFO phenomena. A flying saucer is a disco, the Spanish word for saucer or disc. A UFO is often described as a disc-like object, resembling in many instances, a record. Since a record playing on the radio cannot be seen, a UFO can, though very rarely. To see a UFO, to be the lucky person, is also the desire, the delusion to see the disco, disc or record that we never see in a car when the radio plays that record/music we enjoy so much. And that playing record is a burning one, a condensation that accounts for the reported brilliance of UFO’s, the UFO’s that are brightly lit, lit as if on fire or burning. Granted the accounts of people who might have truly seen a saucer, it also bespeaks a delirious curiosity, at heart a desire to see as opposed to hear what those purely heard saucers look like. And their appearance is conditioned by the confusion of burning and playing, transforming the UFO disc into a bright, fiery object.

Furthermore when a radio plays a song, we have no visual equivalent as to how that sound reached the ear, the car’s radio or the radios in our homes. A flying saucer, seen by someone, is the visual transmission of a purely auditory stimulus. And with our reflexes reduced to staring (while driving) so much, the mysterious radio sound is perforce given its sheer visual support, a record that flies into our car. The quickness of the radio signal is also in relation to the UFO, that ultra-fast disc. Crazy as this idea might seem, it fits in with the craziness of the teenagers then who loved to listen to car radios as were those people called “crazy” if they saw a UFO, or fou, the French word for mad or crazy. People who hear pop music go crazy like the people who see UFO discs. A record, a piece of wax, a waxen disc, flies into my ear, a nonidentifiable object, a nonvisual object, the sound. Already crazy with a nonscopic sound in my ear, the record/wax sound makes me crazier and the record/wax/disco/UFO makes me the craziest, since I’m really seeing what I can only hear. Incidentally, a major record and stereo equipment entrepreneur goes by the name “Crazy Eddie.”

When cars goe or drive on tar, they drive over the asphalt on such roads. Without asphalt or tar, there would be no surface for a car to drive on, no tar or oil for a car to drive with and no tar or sound from the records heard over the car radio to listen to. A car travels along a road, a path, a trail. These are the “grooves” on a road, associative with the “grooves” on a record. Road equals record, since both are derived from oil, roads being made of asphalt and records composed of vinyl, derived as asphalt is, of oil products.

The stylus that plays the record is the car that drives along the road. A record’s turning motion allows the stylus to move. The turntable is powered by electricity, often a transformation of energy from oil. A stylus, besides being a writing instrument, is also related to a ship’s prow, the edge that cuts through water. Every car has a hood, a “prow” of sorts. Ships travel as do cars, one on water, the other on land. Both are called “she.” The car/ship has a stylus, podium, prow that cuts along a path, and thus its mark or trail is made. The wake of churned-up water is the ship’s path as the drippings of oil is the car’s path. The oil drippings of cars are the indicia of a car’s path (not to mention its tire marks). The record’s sound from an LP is the index of a stylus’ path. Sound travels on tar/oil/vinyl records as cars travel on tar/oil/asphalt. Thus a stylus traveling down a record groove is an allegory of a car traveling down a road.

In another vein, without oil there would be no art. In art, there’s the word tar, an anagram. Tar is derived from oil. Painters, of course, use oil to make their art. There are many kinds of oil, or many tars: vinyl, records, acrylic, etc. Artists need tar. Artist-musicians need tar/oil, the same kind of tar that’s involved in the manufacture of records. Painters and musicians employ different art forms or they use different tar forms. Some of them can become a star after becoming successful with their art made of tar, such tar allowing them to goe far. The anagrams arts/tars/star are crucial to the symbols that determine an identification in our culture.

With stars on tars doing arts, the lack of oil threatens their activity too. No oil means no arts, not a single star because of the lack of tars. Again without art or tars or star(s), what will that do to star(ing), what will happen to our sight, since no arts/star(s) will be able to be looked at? What films will we see and what car windows will we look through? As well, no ear wax/oil/tars/arts/star(s) over the car’s radio also means an imminent crisis for our hearing. No records played or burned, no RCA and no car, means no sound heard as it means no oil for cars to drive on. Not being able to see and hear, taken in their sense as drives, is also a lack of the energy or oil to keep those drives goeing. The other drives, the oral and anal, also derive from this collapse of culturally shared images, pleasurewords, mythologies and lois. Thus an ego will then not goe without being driven by the four-wheeled drives of the apertures of our bodies, our bodies that have energy or oil along with the rims or sources from which to discharge that energy: the ears, the eyes, the mouth and the anus. Egos go(es) to drive with oil and aim at oil. Oil drives us from one state of oil to another state/taste of oil.

To taste oil introduces oil’s relation to the third gear of the oral drive, noting another phonic resemblance. America’s addiction to tar is as bad as its addiction to the tar in cigarettes. Even low-tar or ultra low-tar cigarettes resonate with the desire to move away from tar, too much tar, too much oil. Low-mileage cars are really low in tar as some cigarettes are. Low-tar cigarettes are a “rationing” of tar, like the inevitable “rationing” of oil when supplies get low. The oral drive, exemplified by smoking, is also present in the repetitive and pleasurable activity in listening to songs over the radio, on the jukebox, on one’s stereo. Both smoking and listening involve tar/ art and oil/vinyl records. Both are an inhalation, since with smoking one interiorizes tar and in the other, in listening, one can interiorize via the mouth the record’s voice. Resinging a popular song that is played on oil is inhaling a cigarette that has “tar” in it. Introjection is an oral affair, and the record assures us of oral stimulation by the silent, but still vocalized, activity under-goeing when we listen, when we hear the wax in our car that we cannot see. True, the ear wax is invisible, the partition between seeing the ear’s contents and the eye that is to accomplish that act is permanent, unless you were enterprising enough to have a photograph taken of it. Oil is not only in our cars, but in our ears, in our eyes (our stares), and in our mouths. A cigarette, believe it or not, is a small car, an i caret get, an I get(te) a car, or simplified, an I get car. Car’s rhyme with tar could mean I get tar for cigarette, “I smoke cigarettes” can translate into either “I smoke I get cars” or “ I smoke I get tars.” With smoking, the cigarette’s smoke is similar to the exhaust that comes from a car, the remains of burnt-up car oil are also the remains of burnt-up tar. But is the cigarette filter’s passage of smoke the only “exhaust” when we, as smokers, exhale the “exhaust” from our mouth? The exhaust of a car resembles either the cigarette smoke that then passes through the lungs, throat and mouth, as an exhalation, as exhaust. Smoking a cigarette is then an allegory of a car burning oil as both of them spew forth “exhaust.”

Another attenuation of the oral/oil drive. The LP for a vinyl record could bear an i between the letters 1 and p, producing lip. LPs are sung on our lips, our singing reproduces the singing on the record. Lip synch is LP synch, a truism to the argument that our culture is heavily involved in the introjection, the filling of an oral void, of records and oil.

Also, introjecting oil is implicated in the confusion as to whether oil is water or not. Oil is not water, but then water is a liquid, just as oil is.

The fourth gear in the “drive” is the anal drive.

Oil companies have a lot of gold from all the money they’ve made. Gold and oil are nearly synonymous, since their prices affect the status of the world market so radically. Oil is precious, but more precious in its refined state. Black, crude, “dirty,” the oil is originally shitty. Refined, made clean by oil refinery, sewage system plants, the oil loses its shittiness and becomes more valuable, like gold, and circulatable, rather than in its less valuable, “dirty,” crude state.

But if oil is shitty in its crude state and then valuable in its refined state, a hit record, or one of the hits, here was once shit, since shit and hits are anagrams of each other. From crude oil equals shit to refined oil or vinyl equals hits as in the phrase “Top 40 Hits” (Shit), oil will always bear the meaning of its excremental status. Records, as texts, are involved in the problematic of being “extrinsic excrement” or “intrinsic ideality” (Derrida). Oil pollutes too, as in oil slicks or massive refinery plant fires. The dead remnants of prehistoric forests left their rich deposits behind so as to fuel our possessions. Oil is the manure of ancient forests just as it is a manure when “crude” or “dirty” before it is cleaned and refined into the Top 40 Hits (Shit) vinyl LPs. The anal drive completes oil’s four-wheel drive that helps the American (to) drive.

Also the anality of oil is prefigured in the means to mine it. Drilling into the earth to yield the riches (Atlantic Richfield ) withheld by resistant layers of crust obeys sadistic, coprophagic ideas. (Coprophagia is “feeding off dung.”) For the earth to withhold its riches is much like the constipated retention of faeces that enemas or in similar fashion oil rigs relieve.

Oil is gold and gold is shit. Thus oil is shit, either because it resembles shit (dark, untouchable, nauseating, hidden from view) or because its extremely valued state allows us to compare it with what is the least valued as gold is with shit. Gifts, and the symbology derived from them, obey oblative, anal drive ideas. Oil companies and

oil rich countries give us oil, or they, in their withholding, retain the precious gift. This is sadism in its truest sense. Furthermore, concern over the profits oil companies make propels moral ideas as to a more proper distribution, another facet of the ablative character of the anal drive. The shit/oil/gold should be circulated in equivalent amounts, otherwise retention forces those lacking into accusations of hoarding, another anal motif.

America’s desire to ration its oil supplies demonstrates what attenuations the anal drive can goe to. Frugality and judicious use of oil are not without their sadistic connotations, a sodomy done to all, while elsewhere lurks the greater sadists, Arabia and the large oil companies.

The unseen character of oil, its abstractness, after all this gross materiality, and its transformation into fire, energy, combustion, etc. is another important idea. I’ve already tried to explain that with records/oil played/burned on an RCA/car, the unseen disc of vinyl returns in the form of a flying saucer. Oil’s invisibility returns in the form of a disco/disc/vinyl record that flies into the car/RCA burning or playing the music. This music is the beat that goes/egos on, drives egos on. Oil is usually the fuel that our eyes do not see. Oftentimes it is a simple mathematical quota in terms of the car’s registration that the fuel is low. It can also be the rapid calculation of gallons and fractions of gallons seen at the gas pump along with its calculation into a price at another adjacent window on the pump. Its abstract character is further testified by its facilitation of general movement from one place to another. Oil is simply energy, and that energy makes things happen, but energy is not the thing, the idea, it simply allows the thing or idea or event to take place. Like the crucial distinction in psychoanalysis between idea and instinct, oil is instinct, the drive to which the idea is “soldered.” (Although Freud distinguished the two.) Oil determines the drive’s energy as well as the object of the drive, the oil-related product. The record’s idea, its music, is made possible by its oil/vinyl as are the housewife’s errands made possible by car fuel. Oil drives the car just as ideas are aligned to drives, the economic factors that account for the ideas’ repetition, their persistence. There can be no idea without its concomitant energetic investment, no idea without the pressure that realizes it. Conversely there can be no energy without an idea attached to such a quantity-ridden abstraction, a notion prey to alinguistic, transcendental assertions. Oil neither escapes its idea, its conceptual, linguistic, presentational status nor does it escape its energetic quanta, its reducibility to simple distributions of affects. The word oil is just as important as its unseen combustions, its mysterious pervasiveness that organizes things while at the same time remains invisible to them.

There is the vulgarity of those who stress pure, nonverbal ascensions into absolute energy, vibration, impulse, quanta, etc. They are at once giving an idea to a sensation (a sign too), this distribution of pressures that is never independent of representation, language, speaking subjects, discourse.

The fad of jogging is a near mystical embrace of this idea of pure energy, but why would they be jogging but in a time-bound situation where the deprivation of oil or energy insists that they have vitality, a lot of energy or oil? Joggers presume their freedom from oil at the very moment when their livelihoods are threatened by its absence. The fastest jogger inversely affirms a slowing down of the I go in cars. One reminder: race and car. Eliminate the e in race and permute the rest of the letters into car. Joggers are in a race, a strange car race. Even the ger in jogger echoes car (c and g arc both velar stops). Mania, here in the jogger, is close to mourning, where the oil-ideal (usually an ego-ideal) is now about to become lost forever to the historical specificity of driving oil-powered automobiles.

Other movement manias, the discomania and the roller skating mania, are close to the problem of the disappearance of oil. Dancing in discos and roller skating obey the general idea of movement and lots of it. Disco music is the music that is in our ears whose ear wax is also the oil that constitutes the records played over sound systems. Hearing oil is also moving to it and being driven by it. Dancing and its euphonic embrace, this mania for the ego in perfect self-presentation, is only about to mourn the loss of what makes the dancers goe so energetically, the oil record or the car/ear oil/wax under question. When we dance our cars are driven by oil and when we drive our cars are driven by oil.

Oil as instinct will probably find its greatest threat in the future when no oil makes impossible libidinal contact with others. The freedom for a young man and woman in a car, flaunting parental admonitions against sex, to have that pleasure (and the car/RCA/radio music that serves to express that impulse) is threatened by no more oil. Goeing elsewhere for sex is becoming an archaism, at least when fuel, energy, oil is involved. Granted there will always be libido, drives and instincts, it’s just that oil has tyrannized ourselves, our autos to the point where its exclusion would result in the deprivation of key ideas governing so much human intercourse. No energy (oil) is no sex, a thought related to Ernest Jones’s observation that what the subject fears most is the loss of libido, aphanisis, an idea more threatening than the irreducibility of castration. Will no oil castrate the Western/ American subject so radically as to force libidinal contact into retreat? Will the lack of oil dismiss representation altogether? An impossibility, despite the intimate congruence between its manufacture and the significations surrounding it. No sex, no art, no stars, no records, along with the absence of their energetic foundations, shows the profound anxiety we’re goeing through. Its resolution appears to be intractably elusive, considering oil’s complex impregnation into our culture’s discourse, our intramental and socially exterior selves, our autos. How can our auto/ego let goe of oil?

Some further points.

Having used the phrase “our oil” throughout the text, it appears to be a cryptic device since it works on a variety of registers. America’s oil, the country’s oil, or “our oil” works on a phonic level with the l and r substitutive with each other. Some people have difficulty learning the interval r, since both l and r are liquids. Our oil can reverse into oul oir in light of the transposability of the liquids, thus proving the word our’s proximity to oil. On the semantic level, our oil makes the phonic connection even more binding since we do believe that oil is essential to our selves, our autos, our properties, our cars, our records, stars, arts, etc.

Iran anagrammatizes into rain. Rain is from the air, whereas oil is from the ground or oils are from the soil. But Iran is in a desert where there is little rain. Oil’s difference to water is also implicated in the question whether the Persian Gulf has water, drinkable or nondrinkable, or oil within the waters of the gulf. Is the Persian Gulf made up of oil? Since, empirically, it’s saltwater, our desire believes the Persian Gulf (as in the Gulf Oil Company) to be composed of oil, an immediate explanation for its oil-rich status. But Iran and its Persian Gulf neighbors are in an arid, desert-ridden land. They only have oil and saltwater, and none of them are drinkable. America, however, has water, fresh, drinkable water in great quantities but none of the great quantities of Persian Gulf oil, made into an even greater quantity because of the equation of the gulf’s waters with the wealth of the oil near its shores. The rain or water in Iran is its oil that does not come from the air but from the ground, even in our delusion from the oil-rich Persian Gulf itself, the sea, the saltwater. Saltwater already has a mineral in it just as it could possess oil: oilwater for saltwater shows a mixture of mineral with water.

I wrote this essay during the hostage crisis in Iran. Then, in 1980, nearly every American politician ran for office. “I ran” is a conceivable phrase to have been uttered by a presidential candidate in the ‘80s elections. “I ran against Iran” forms a neat cryptophor in the narration of a campaigning ego. And that ego will have to goe far on oil in a car to assert why Iran is something he (in specular opposition) is running against. “I go” becomes the same as “I ran” (aren’t some candidates joggers, an “ I ran”?), but with Iran being the aggressively counterposed party , the I go/ego/I ran of an American presidential candidate will have to outdistance Iranian policy, a difficulty since the politics of oil make that running, going and driving a tremendous problem.

Iran’s oil anagrammatizes into the opposition no Israil. Either America gets Iran’s oil at the expense of Israil/lsrael or refuses Iran for the sake of Israel.

The Arab oil cartel is a cryptophor working against those cultures that have lots of cars but no oil. A cartel of oil rich countries makes Americans in particular angry over what will not let car(s) run on their needed fuel.

America’s president, (Jimmy) Carter, remixes into car tar, another cryptophor that would explain our current repetition of an oil-based economy. (His predecessor was car-related: Gerald Ford.) Carter/car tar cryptically advocates cars powered by tar, even though this man set up a Department of Energy. Its secretary, Mr. Schlesinger, is from the army; from the occupying forces to the question of “force” or energy in general, he is still in the same role. For force to be used against the cartel that will not let our cars goe needs someone intimate with force, energy, drives in general. If we were to “occupy” or to “besetzen” Iran, for example, it would be true to the Freudian idea of economy, the economic factor in his metapsychology. To occupy Iran is the very thing that determines occupation, Besetzung, mistranslated by James Strachey as “cathexis.” The cathexis of oil in our daily lives shows how much oil is on our minds. Our occupation with oil will lead us to occupy oil, to occupy the countries that have oil. The occupation of Iran is only the intramental equivalent of an occupation, a hyper-occupation (Überbesetzung), the same kind of energy that makes joggers and disco dancers goe so fast. James Schlesinger’s position in the Energy Department makes him the Defense Department’s chairman all over again, simply because he will advocate “occupation,” or oil, America’s energy that is now about to loose occupations, to loose peace, to loose a machinery of signs, all to countries that America has to occupy for its occupation to continue. A beaten Iran will be occupied and the beat will run on and the occupation will continue its simultaneously pleasurable and unpleasurable drive.

 

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** jay, Hi, jay! Awesome you love ‘Gendernauts’. The ‘sequel’ ‘Genderation’ is very interesting if you can manage to see it. Haneke, nice. Actually, ‘White Ribbon’ might be my favorite Haneke. Sort of an odd choice maybe, but there you go. So happy you’re into the Kristof trilogy. So, so great. And your dad is into Kristof. That’s crazy. I feel like she’s so under -known relative to her amazingness. Gold star for your dad. Super nice. Thanks, I will proceed apace and you too wth your work and play. ** _Black_Acrylic, Hope the film sits well with you. Autumny here too. Such a relief! ** Dominik, Hi and yay back!!! It’s not for sure about the German festival, but they would want us there for four days, and the festival is at the end of October, so that would kind of kill the LA Halloween. We’ll see. Dead rotting body slumped unseen over the roof of the elevator cabin? Just a guess. Love hoping that a film festival we really want to get RT into having decided to follow me on Instagram yesterday is a good sign, G. ** Carsten, Constant surprise is one of the blog’s goals in life. Pleasant surprise, mind you. LA is pretty swell year-round too, it’s true, although heat-hater me could maybe do without the July -> late October over-sunniness. Wow, Marseille? You really do like heat, don’t you? I’ll pore over the Indiewire list, but already just at a glance seeing ‘All That Jazz’ as #1 does not bode well whatsoever. And Hollis Frampton can’t get any higher than #28? Phooey. And Bresson only at #90?! Fuck them and the horse they rode in on. ** Steve, Yes, someone from Anthology just asked me to do a conversation with Treut for that, but unfortunately I don’t think I can do it. Odd dream. Death’s sneaky effect is the strangest and maybe most fascinating thing about it, as I think I already said. Extremely early on the haunt plans. First we need to see who’ll be on board to collaborate and what the location possibilities are. We can’t do much until we actually get to LA. ** Jeff J, Hey! September 1 at 4 pm my time is good. I just penned it in. Great. You were in LA! Tosh mentioned something about seeing Michael. I’m very curious to hear about that, obviously. Yes, happy with the RT rollout so far. Really excited that RT is the Official Opening Night Film at the Chicago Underground Film Festival. That’s a dream come true, and the Toronto screening soon thereafter should be great. There are some good later things happening that I can’t talk about yet. And of course the theater release in France is huge. Yes, of course about The Song Cave posts. Yes, I’d be honored. Thanks, man. ** Bill, Her films are reasonably seeable online. I guess ‘The Marbled Swarm’ is pretty squishy, but only once it gets into your mind. Ooh, find the time to build that tool, obviously. Right, the comix = squishiness incarnate. And, yeah, I see/feel that in your work. Sonically too. Do you think you’ll be able to start making that work, or I mean is the approach sufficiently cemented? ** Florian S. Fauna, Hey there, Florian! Very curious to see what you do with video. I did get ‘Eusect’ just recently, and I started reading it, and I like it a lot so far. This is a good nudge to get back into it. The illustrations are wonderful, of course! So nice to see you! ** julian, I’ve been … pretty okay, how about you? Oh, nice that my conversation with Ryan made my stuff enterable. It was so great being able to do that with him. I really, really want to go over there and visit him and the project. I have to figure that out. But, yeah, he’s a real genius. I’m totally in awe of his and Lizzie’s work. ** HaRpEr //, Rosa Von Praunheim’s work is really all over the place, but when he’s good, he’s really good. Oh, god, the wait for a reply to a submission is total hell. Obviously we’re in that with the film. And, yes, it’s shocking how many, in our case, film programmers think never responding is an acceptable way to say no. That happens all the time. I think you can submit to multiple places at once, no? Certainly with the film we do. ‘Let it Be’, the Replacements album not the worst ever Beatles song, is sublime. Kind of a perfect record. One of the times I saw The Replacements was in Amsterdam when I was living there, and they were so drunk and stoned that they played their whole set lying on their backs. Even the drummer. ** Tyler Ookami, Hi. I hope the employment has counteracting benefits, maybe even more than financially? Oh, ugh, about ‘Bring Her Back’. That’s what I was afraid of, I guess. Back-pedalled. Cool about the show. How was it? ** Darby 🐈‍⬛, Oh, shit, you’re right about the alligator. I just thought the lizard was a little chubby. ‘The Dispossessed’ … no, the name sounds familiar though. I’ll check it out. I thought you asked me about spontaneous cheese. My eyes were clearly wack last time. I have no idea what it is, but I like the concept. The pharmacy is still there, but they don’t have a big stock of things, and they don’t speak English, and whenever I go in they look at me and cringe. Patches, nice. They sound spooky. ** Nicholas., Congrats on the job interview. I’m not the hugest Tarkovsky fan, but everyone else I know is, so ‘Stalker’ is probably great, or so my friends think. Was it? I miss great Mexican food. I miss driving sometimes. I miss my friends, duh. I miss the flock of wild parrots that live in the palm tree in front of my apartment there. There are some things. Get some sleep. ** Right. Many, many years ago I made a post about ‘The Age of Oil’, but there was almost nothing about the book online at the time so the post sucked. But I checked recently, and there is slightly more about the book now, so I made a new if still inadequate post about it. You’ll probably never be able to find the book, but it’s a very eccentric and kind of amazing thing. See you tomorrow.

Monika Treut’s Day

 

‘Monika Treut’s transgressive brand of filmmaking is a much needed intervention into the arena of sexual politics. Her misbehaving women are a vital form of resistance. — Julia Knight, Sight and Sound.

‘Monika Treut was born in Moenchengladbach, Germany, on April 6, 1954. She studied literature and politics at Philipps-University, Marburg. In the mid-seventies she began working with video. Her PhD thesis The Cruel Woman: Female Images in the Writing of Marquis de Sade and Leopold von Sacher-Masoch was published in Germany, Switzerland and Austria in 1984.

‘In the mid-eighties Treut started to write, direct and produce award-winning independent features and documentaries, which screened at numerous film festivals throughout the world and enjoy international distribution. Retrospectives have been held in Mexico City, Rio de Janeiro, Sao Paolo, Taipei, Toronto, Cambridge, Helsinki, Hamburg, Thessaloniki, Prague, Warsaw, Athens, Los Angeles and Lisbon.

‘Treut’s first feature, co-directed with Elfi Mikesch, was the controversial Seduction: The Cruel Woman,1985, which since has become a cult classic. The black and white coming-out tale Virgin Machine followed in 1988. My Father Is Coming, a comedy of manners set in New York, was released in 1991.

‘In 1992, Treut began directing documentaries including Female Misbehavior, four portraits of bad girls, among them Annie Sprinkle and Camille Paglia; Didn’t Do It For Love in 1997, a portrait of Norwegian-born Eva Norvind, B-movie star in Mexico, later dominatrix in New York; Gendernauts in 1999, about a group portrait of transgendered cyborgs in San Francisco. In 2001 Treut completed Warrior of Light, on Yvonne Bezerra de Mello, an internationally renowned artist and human rights activist who works with endangered children in the streets and slums of Rio de Janeiro.

‘Since 2002 Treut is infatuated with Taiwan. There she wrote, directed and co-produced 3 documentaries, Tigerwomen Grow Wings about three generations of women, featuring well-known writer Li Ang, famed opera singer Hsieh Yueh Hsia and young film director DJ Chen. Made in Taiwan, a portrait of a 17-year-old dance student followed in 2005. In 2009 Treut released Ghosted a feature film about an unsual love story between Hamburg and Taipei. Most recently another documentary was finished The Raw and the Cooked, a culinary journey through Taiwan, which aptly premieres at the 2012 Berlin international film festival’s section Culinary Cinema.

‘Since 1990 Treut has also been teaching and lecturing at Colleges (Vassar, Hollins, and Dartmouth), Art Institutes (SFAI) and Universities (IU Bloomington, UI Chicago, UC San Diego and Cornell U) in the U.S. Treut runs the independent film production company, Hyena Films, with offices in Hamburg, Germany.’ — Hyena Films

 

____
Stills
















































 

____
Further

Monika Treut @ IMDb
Hyena Films . Films by Monika Treut
Monika Treut Film @ Facebook
Monika Treut’s films on Fandor
Monika Treut @ Vimeo
Monika Treut : Die grausame Frau. Zum Frauenbild bei de Sade und Sacher-Masoch
Lesbian Desire Rewrites Venus in Furs
Monika Treut: Female Misbehavior!
Monika Treut’s films on MUBI
Pro-Porn Rhetoric and the Cinema of Monika Treut
Not Enough Body
From Taboo Parlor to Porn and Passing
Interview with Director Monika Treut
IN CONVERSATION WITH MONIKA TREUT
Podcast: A Place For Film: Filmmaker Monika Treut
German director reflects on three decades of lesbian-themed films
Mondo Tranny: Monika Treut’s Gendernauts
Monika Treut captures the power of youth and nature

 

____
Extras


Master Class Monika Treut


Trailer zu Special Teddy Award für Monika Treut – Berlinale 2017


Monika Treut ein Portrait 2005


Interview with Monika Treut, Director “GENDERATION”

 

______
Interview

 

Filmmaker: So what inspired this latest fiction film? It seems quite a departure from 2012’s The Raw and the Cooked – a doc about Taiwan’s culinary traditions – not to mention from your more radical early films. Do you see a common thread throughout your body of work, or have your interests changed greatly over the years?

Treut: Of Girls and Horses was initiated by my German distribution company, Edition Salzgeber. For a few years now, they have been coproducing LGBT-themed, low-budget features. They give me free reign in everything. At first I wanted to stay away from the idea, since I clearly have had many experiences making low and no-budget features. But then I remembered my love for horses, which started in my childhood and teenage years when I was a tomboyish “horsegirl” spending all my afternoons in the stable. I’ve always wanted to convey the attraction to these powerful animals in a movie. At this point in my life I also longed for a change of scenery – getting out of the cities, away from the ubiquitous screens and digital devices, and the overflow of information. When I found the location, the horse and cattle farm in the middle of nowhere in Northern Germany, I was smitten by being able to spend a fair amount of time up there, with little internet access, just surrounded by animals and nature and the relaxed farmers.

The common thread of my films so far? Well, it was possibly the difficulty to get them financed, and the small budgets, which came out as a result. Each of the films was met with skepticism by the funding bodies, not so uncommon for female filmmakers. So I produced most of them myself through my production company Hyena Films. The subjects of the films have always been closely connected to the changes in my life.

Filmmaker: When it comes to filmmaking you’re a “switch hitter” like your fellow countryman Werner Herzog. You seem at ease moving between the worlds of fiction and nonfiction. Do you use specific skills for each form? Or is your working method more like the Danes, who are trained not to separate doc from narrative – to just shoot movies?

Treut: I like switching between the two to ease the pain. In fiction the shoot is nervewracking but postproduction is heaven – and with documentaries it’s the opposite. But really, I believe working in both forms is inspiring – to allow for real life to intrude into fiction, to be open for happy accidents, to leave space for actors to improvise. Whereas in documentary filmmaking I believe it’s helpful to work with a strong narrative structure, especially during the editing process.

Filmmaker: Since you’re an artist who’s worked in both Germany and the U.S., I’m curious to hear what you think are the biggest differences between the two countries. I know several filmmakers who’ve moved to Berlin in recent years, finding the city more conducive to creativity I suppose.

Treut: Often it seems that one’s creativity is helped by being in a foreign environment, and therefore losing one’s sense of security. In Germany it’s easier to find public funding for art and film projects. In the U.S. there’s more support from the actual filmmaking community. But the latter might just be my personal experience.

Filmmaker: I find it pretty mind-blowing that your feature film debut Seduction: The Cruel Woman and documentary Gendernauts: A Journey Through Shifting Identities were released in 1985 and 1999, respectively. I mean, it took literally decades for the culture to catch up with you. So now that we’re in the age of 50 Shades and Caitlyn Jenner on the cover of Vanity Fair, what are your thoughts on the mainstreaming of both BDSM and gender nonconformity?

Treut: I’m all for equal human rights, and I’m happy that the U.S. and Western Europe slowly seem to be coming to a better understanding of trans people. But of course there are still huge problems, not even mentioning the grim situation in most areas of our planet. I can’t say much about Caitlyn Jenner. Her story is small news on the other side of the Atlantic. I understand that in the U.S she’s big news since she was an American celebrity as Bruce Jenner. If this helps to raise people’s consciousness about the terrible binary gender prison that’s great. But as for 50 Shades, I doubt that mainstream attention is able to change people’s attitude on a deeper level.

Filmmaker: Back when I was growing up genderqueer I didn’t have a word for what I felt. I also didn’t know why I was so strongly drawn to the world of S&M. But looking back I realize that above all BDSM allowed me to exist in a genderless space. It’s all tops and bottoms and switches in that community – i.e., you’re defined by your power preference, not by male/female or even necessarily gay/straight. Have you long seen a link between sadomasochism and personal identity?

Treut: I think that was also partly my attraction to the world of S&M in my early years, the playfulness and the irony of gender and power roles. Other than that I was attracted by the power the classic S&M scene gives to women, following the literary sources like Leopold von Sacher-Masoch’s novels, foremost Venus in Furs. And of course the fantastic world of fetishes – costumes, whips, boots, wigs. I believe I’ve learned a lot through communicating intensely with the subjects of my documentary films. Like with Eva Norvind, the subject of my documentary Didn’t Do It For Love, a former dominatrix who changed her identity many times throughout her turbulent life.

 

______________
12 of Monika Treut’s 19 films

_______________
The Virgin Machine (1988)
‘Young Hamburg journalist Dorothee Müller is fed up with her persistent lover, Heinz. A complete ingénue, she innocently embarks upon an exploration of romantic love – is it merely a ‘woman’s malady’? The places where she undertakes this research include a pleasure-addicted hormone researcher’s practice and the monkey house at the zoo. Unable to find any satisfactory answers, Dorothee decides to leave Europe and head for California where she continues her research by conducting interviews and some personal explorations. In swinging San Francisco she meets three remarkable women: a cheeky Hungarian named Dominique who sneers at the German work ethic and offers to help Dorothee in her research; Susie Sexpert, a specialist in sexual pleasures who has an astonishing collection of dildos, and finally the attractive Ramona, who performs a hot strip as a drag king in a lesbian bar. By the end of her journey Dorothee has rediscovered her own sexuality and put several illusions firmly behind her.’ — Berlinale


Trailer

Watch the film here

 

_______________
My Father Is Coming (1991)
‘Treut – a German director whose sex-pol essays like Virgin Machine and Seduction: the Cruel Woman have earned plenty of controversy and cult acclaim – here spins a tale of sexual awakening, presided over with ecstasy-aunt jollity by ‘post-porn sex goddess’ Sprinkle. Vicki (Kästner) is a sexually confused actress holding down a waitress job, and trying to persuade her visiting Bavarian papa (the marvellously shambling Edel) that she’s happily married, although her ‘husband’ is fully occupied with vogueing Latin boys. Happily, La Sprinkle is on hand to distract papa with tender mercies and household appliances while Vicki makes her mark as a nightclub diva. A low-rent, loosely structured lesbian coming-out story that entertains a range of sexual orientations, Treut’s film enshrines an engaging worldview – SoHo chic seen from a sort of polysexual Teutonic ‘Carry On’ perspective.’ — Time Out (NYC)


Trailer

 

______________
Female Misbehavior (1992)
Female Misbehavior is a collection of five films that explore the outer limits of female sexuality and behavior. Each film features a woman who has challenged the status quo, provoking shock and outrage in some and gaining respect and admiration from others. Annie is an inside look (in more ways than one) at Annie Sprinkle, porn-star, performance artist and sexual diva. Dr. Paglia is a confrontation with Camille Paglia, the infamous author. Bondage centers on an S&M practitioner and her use of pain as pleasure. Max is the story of a transsexual’s journey from female to male. And the feature length Didn’t Do It For Love explores the fascinating life of Eva Norvind, the blond Norwegian bombshell who was Mexico’s Marilyn Monroe in the 1960’s and New York’s leading dominatrix in the 1980’s.’ — collaged


the entire film

 

______________
Danish Girls Show Everything (1996)
‘This Danish omnibus film consists of 20 shorts, by a bevy of international directors; the project as a whole was conceived by Danish visual artist Ane Mette Ruge and Dutch opera-director Jacob F. Schokking. The title represents a pun; in addition to its obvious sensationalistic implications (which is used ironically – almost nothing in the film, aside from some incidental nudity, is exploitative), the “everything” refers to the plethora of subjects at hand, with the filmmakers exploring topics from national identity to ornithology, to trips abroad to Vietnam and Brazil, to the history of Berlin’ — filmaffinity


the entire film

 

______________
Didn’t Do It for Love (1997)
‘DIDN’T DO IT FOR LOVE is a documentary portrait of Eva Norvind, a.k.a. Mistress Ava Taurel, born Eva Johanne Chegodaieva Sakonskaya in Trondheim, Norway. The film follows Eva’s many careers, from her time as a showgirl in Paris to becoming Mexico’s Marilyn Monroe in the 1960s to establishing herself as New York’s most famous dominatrix in the 1980s. Using clips from Norvind’s Mexican films, stills from various periods, and interviews with friends, partners and family, Treut’s documentary traces Eva’s search for the wellspring of her obsessive and dark sexuality.’ — gd.de


Trailer

 

______________
Gendernauts: A Journey Through Shifting Identities (1999)
‘GENDERNAUTS explores phenomena of gender fluidity at the end of the last millennium in the Bay Area, California. It is a film about cyborgs, people who alter their bodies and minds with new technologies and chemistry, with an emphasis on biological women who use the male sexual hormone testosterone. Max Wolf Valerio, San Francisco’s leading gender mixer, who reads from his book, Max, A Man; Jordy Jones with his Net art; Texas Tomboy with his video art; Stafford, who explores new business venues and, together with Jordy Jones, organizes ‘Club Confidential’, the world’s leading gender bender event. And there’s Hida, an intersexual woman who happily inhabits the middle ground between male and female; and two extraordinary biological women who support transgender people: sex goddess Annie Sprinkle and ex-centrefold model Tornado, who was Stafford’s lover and is the self-proclaimed mother of Texas Tomboy. Excursions are made into the life of the spotted hyena, a very special animal society. The female hyena has an enlarged clitoris that looks like a penis. Her bloodstream carries a large amount of testosterone, especially when she’s pregnant. The tour guide for this journey through shifting gender identities is Sandy Stone, also known as the ‘Goddess of Cyberspace’, who is the Director of the ACTLab at the University of Texas at Austin. Director Monika Treut is a member of this year’s Joris Ivens jury.’ — idfa.nl


Trailer


Excerpt

 

_____________
Encounter with Werner Schroeter (2008)
‘The late German film, theatre and opera director Schroeter is a self-proclaimed dinosaur from another age when people dreamed of ultimate freedom in film”. Filmmaker Treut visits him on the set of his feature “DEUX” in Paris, and in Düsseldorf during the production of the opera “Norma”.’ — MT

Watch the film here

 

______________
Ghosted (2009)
‘An unusual love story that bridges two worlds. Artist Sophie Schmitt travels from Hamburg to Taipei to come to terms with the sudden and unexplained death of her Taiwanese lover Ai-ling. There, Sophie is pursued by a pushy journalist who seems obsessed with Ai-Ling´s fate. A series of strange happenings unsettle Sophie until she manages to demystify her perception.’ — m-appeal


Trailer


Excerpt

 

_______________
The Raw And The Cooked (2012)
tHE rAw AND tHE cookED is a culinary journey around the gourmet’s paradise, tai- wan. the film makes seven stops along the way. In the island’s capital, taipei, we visit a traditional taiwanese restaurant, a legendary dim-sum palace, and one of the city’s lively night markets. Next, we encounter the hearty cuisine of the Hakka, taiwan’s largest ethnic community; we’re introduced to the pure and delicious seafood specialties of the Ami indigenous tribe; and we get a glimpse of the Buddhist influences on taiwanese cuisine. Finally, we are invited to a banquet by one of the island’s most creative chefs. combining traditional cuisine and best organic ingredients, he weaves a culinary magic to create spectacular and novel dishes.’ — Hyena Films


Trailer


Monika Treut ‘The Raw And The Cooked’ Interview

 

________________
Of Girls and Horses (2014)
‘Girls love horses, according to Peggy Orenstein, author of Cinderella Ate My Daughter, because they identify with their strength. They are, Orenstein explained, in a NPR segment, a source of “power and motion and transformation.” This sense of transformation is what Monika Treut harnesses in her new film, Of Girls and Horses. Of Girls and Horses is a departure from the earlier work that put Treut on the queer map—I mean, I still giggle nervously when I think about her 1992 documentary Female Misbehavior with Camille Paglia. This film turns toward youth, toward innocence, beauty and power as they exist in nature. Some moments linger too long in the heaviness of metaphor, and some parts of the narrative, particularly Nina’s story about her relationship with her partner, feel disconnected from the primary plot. Yet Treut is asking the viewer to sit, rest and take in the energy around them—it is the same task demanded of Alex. This injunction is subtle and startling, just like the vital energy of girls, and of horses.’ — afterellen


Trailer

 

______________
Zona Norte (2016)
’15 years after our award-winning documentary WARRIOR OF LIGHT, the portrait of internationally acclaimed human rights activist Yvonne Bezerra de Mello and her work with street kids in Rio, ZONA NORTE is investigating the development and sustainability of the project. Over the years, Yvonne has developed a new pedagogy that helps children who are traumatized by violence to overcome their experiences and the resulting learning problems. The children we portrayed 15 years ago are now young adults. They report from their lives in the most dangerous favela in the north of the city. They are the living proof that an alternative pedagogy is capable to break the vicious circle of poverty and violence.’ — z-n


Trailer


Interview with MonikaTreut about “Zona Norte”

 

_____________
Genderation (2021)
‘Monika Treut’s Gendernauts was one of the first films to portray the transgender movement in San Francisco. Twenty years later, Treut seeks out the pioneers of that time. What has changed? How have the lives of the protagonists evolved? San Francisco was once, as Annie Sprinkle puts it, the “clitoris of the USA”, but today the tech industry has a firm grip on the city. Aggressive gentrification has displaced the genderqueer community of yesteryear. Under the Trump administration, hard-won transgender rights are under massive pressure as protection against discrimination in healthcare and freedom of choice in the use of public toilets are rolled back.

‘Alternating between quiet, unobtrusive images and flashbacks, the film delineates how the gendernauts have grown into their identities over the years, developed their careers and started families, and how their energy continues to have an impact today. Their activism has changed over time, but the struggles continue. New perspectives have been added – such as the relationship between humankind and nature in the Anthroprocene epoch – but also the question of how they want to live in old age.’ — Berlinale


Trailer


Excerpt

 

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** Dominik, Hi!!! Groovy. No, most amusement parks open like clockwork whereas Prater seems to like to lie in bed for a while staring at the ceiling when its wakeup alarm goes off. But what’s nice is that you can walk around in it while it’s asleep. Most parks lock you out until they’re ready for you. Aw, thanks, to love and you. Love happy that his film just got into a big German film festival but its timing means he might not be able to go to LA Halloween which would be tragic, but hey, G. ** _Black_Acrylic, Right, so confusing that you guys call jello ‘jelly’. And I assume actual jelly is always jam? In Australia they call cotton candy ‘fairy floss’ for goodness sake. Never saw ‘Barbarian’. A friend just recommended I watch it before I dip into ‘Weapons’, I don’t know why. ** tomk, Half-way through! Amazing! I envy you, my man. That’s super exciting. The usual doubts: no way around that shit, sadly. Dude, that’s so great about the NYC thing and the book tour! Don’t worry, it’ll be momentous. Wow. Big pat on the back to Whiskey Tit! Wonderful, Tom! ** Mari, That’s interesting that Latin countries are into jello. Huh. I always think of it as something whose hotbed is the American midwest where the taste in food seems very … industrious and gung-ho. I like one of the red jellos, not strawberry but … raspberry maybe? And with lots of whipped cream. I don’t eat jello without whipped cream. Although even low end, heavily manufactured whipped cream like Cool Whip will do. Oh, I don’t know what kind of people my work attracts. People often seem to think my work would attract predators and abusers and so on, but I will say that in my experience my work attracts people who relate to the young characters, I guess. Really smart and nice and complicated people. Seems to me. I wish the very same and more so for your week. When does the new semester start? What classes (or whatever) are you going to be jumping back into? ** Bill, Jello’s squishiness is so uniquely satisfying. Like a fragile bubble-butt cheek or something. ‘Lurker’ … on it. I want to know how you ace squishiness in your piece. I want to make a squishy novel. I wonder how. Hm. ** Steve, My guess is the latter? Enjoy the wind and rain. We’re wonderfully cooled down, but the rain has been sparse thus far. Wow, I’ll see if and how I can watch that series. Sounds great. ** Carsten, Paris is pretty relentlessly charming. Well, I hate summer, and it does get hot here, but it gets hot everywhere these days, and I’d rather be sweating here than in … anywhere else? Anyway, the heat doesn’t dispel the charms. Crazy place that way. You’ll be close enough to Paris to scoot over here at some point. ** Corey, Who, me? Gosh, thanks. Oh god, I hate jello fruit salad. My problem entirely, I understand, but oh, what a horror that combo is if you like the anti-natural vapidity with wobbly substance of pure jello. What a wonderful jello commercial! How could I have missed it first time around. Everyone, Corey contributes this to yesterday’s jello show, and it’s a keeper. Oh, okay. Paul C. does read this blog sometimes, so I hope we haven’t ruined the surprise. Magazine stuff sounds good. I mean hiccups are inescapable, no? Beyond Baroque: There was a boss who ran the place. There was a Board of Directors who raised money. Jack Skelley ran the typesetting operation they used to have and also curated the music series. I curated the readings/performances/film events. There were volunteers who ran the bookstore. There was someone who did the press releases and calendar and stuff. I had total freedom. Apart from the terrible pay ($300 a month), it was dreamy. Little Caesar: I did everything. It was a one person operation, but sometimes Bob Flanagan would help me schlep packages to the post office and stuff. The magazine got a lot of buzz naturally. I didn’t really have to do anything. And I just wrote to all the writers I liked and asked for work at first. And after LC got buzzy people would submit work all the time. ** Hugo, You’re welcome to. Oh, no big plans on the themes. An idea springs to mind and I do it. I will try ‘Weapons’, but my suspicion is that I’ll think ‘okay, whatever’ at most. Gluck’s always good. I’d suggest ‘Denny Smith’ but it’s very o.o.p., although I think it’s being republished. His recent one ‘About Ed’ is very good. ‘Jack the Modernist’ is my favorite of his, I think. I wish you a day of stars too but with a capital S. ** HaRpEr //, It’s true, jello does still seem like a manifestation of optimistism and futurism to me. From the days when cars had bright colors and physically artful aspirations. Uh, I can imagine maybe Zac and I might make a cameo in the haunt, but I suspect we’ll be the hosts/greeters. With Ryan’s stuff. the thing is that it’s bankroll by one of the big fashion houses, I forget which one, and they’re very controlling of how the work gets seen. He can’t even show the new work in galleries. So I don’t know how that work will get out. It sucks, but they are paying for the amusement park, so … ** Nicholas., Um, a few weeks each time on the bronchitis. And I was supposed to quit smoking, but of course I didn’t. I’ve never vaped. I don’t trust vaping, rightly or wrongly. And when I see someone vaping, I always think ‘what a wuss’, haha. ** Darby 🐊, Nice lizard. Lizards are underrated creatures. Spontaneous cheese … does mean, like, Cheese Whiz? We’re seemingly past the heat over here. I’m counting the minutes until you are. Book club, nice. How is that going to work? In person or online or … ? I will go look for mochi pancakes, wow. Thanks about ‘TMS’, pal. Erasing your comment would have been a crime. Beautiful description of where you are or were when you were being attentive. Where I live? It looks very French, non-stop French. Here’s my street. The door to my building is just behind where those motorcycles are. Being organised is my goal, and I will do my best. You too. ** Uday, Being domestically a little unorganised, I rely on people like you. The hair ironing didn’t work so I was stuck with curly hair. I guess it was more wavy, too wavy. I hope your friends were delighted. ** Okay. Today the blog tackles the films of the pioneering queer filmmaker Monika Treut. Check it out. See you tomorrow.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 DC's

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑