DC's

The blog of author Dennis Cooper

Page 895 of 1103

James Coburn Day *

* (restored)

 

‘For my generation, raised on Sunday afternoon repeats of The Magnificent Seven and The Great Escape, Coburn was one of the great Sixties Tough Guys – part of that breed of hip macho actors like Steve McQueen and James Garner who bridged the gap between the square-jawed heroes of the Fifties (Charlton Heston, Burt Lancaster) and the neurotic anti-heroes of the Seventies, such as Al Pacino and Robert De Niro.

‘These Sixties Tough Guys were old-school without being square. They’d all served in the army or navy, but were shaped by the social liberation of the Fifties, so they smoked dope and broke the rules, whilst being grown-ups and not angst-ridden adolescents. The result was a style of acting that was intense and modern without the woe-is-me excesses of the Method. In a word, cool. As Coburn liked to say, “I’m a jazz kind of actor, not rock’n’roll.”

‘Coburn drifted into the army after school, where he played the conga drums in a service club band before deciding on a career in acting after his formidable baritone (brought on by a childhood bout of bronchitis) found him doing voiceovers for army training films. His unlikely role model was Mickey Rooney, whom he’d watched repeatedly while working as an usher at the local cinema. His biggest influence, though, was grande dame Stella Adler, under whom he studied in New York at the Stella Adler Studio of Acting.

‘He blossomed under her flamboyant approach and quoted her maxims for the rest of his life (‘Never be boring, darling!’). Thanks to his rangy physique and deep voice, he was soon working steadily on television Westerns such as Wagon Train and Bonanza. He nearly always played the heavy or the murderer – everything from eyepatch-wearing hicks to waistcoated smoothies – and tended to fare best when he could add a little panache or sarcastic topspin to his lines.

‘The apotheosis of all this fine-tuned physicality was Coburn’s big break as the knife-throwing gunman in The Magnificent Seven in 1960. The set in Mexico was a testosterone-fest of hotshot actors fidgeting with their Stetsons to upstage the star, Yul Brynner. But Coburn went the other way, making a virtue of his minimal dialogue (just 14 terse lines), and embodying a Zen-like stillness instead. He must be the first Western hero to wait for the bad guys by sitting down cross-legged and inspecting a flower.

‘By 1964, with Coburn progressing to bigger movie roles, the couple decided to buy a house to match. It was a sprawling Moroccan mansion in Beverly Hills, where the neighbours included Bill Cosby and Jack Lemmon. Beverly brought in designer Tony Duquette and turned the house into a Swinging Sixties fevered dream of turquoise walls, scarlet bannisters and zebra-skin rugs.

‘Finally, Coburn ascended to leading man stardom with Our Man Flint in 1966 and the sequel, In Like Flint, a year later. Conceived as the American answer to James Bond films, the movies were unabashed campfests, but not without wit. Master spy Derek Flint boasts a black belt in judo, cohabits with four playmates and can speak in 47 languages, including dolphin. His cigarette lighter has 82 different functions – “83 if you want to light a cigar.”

‘These were the good years for Coburn – a giddy, decade-long whirl of jet-set travel, fast driving, tailored suits, glamorous projects and epochal socialising. When Dennis Hopper threw a wrap party at their house without actually bothering to tell them first, the Coburns simply opened the doors and pressed the kids into service. When the Karmapa of Tibet and his retinue of Buddhist monks came to town, they all stayed at his house. Coburn even took His Holiness for a spin in his red Ferrari along Mulholland Drive, saffron robes trailing.

‘Coburn experimented with LSD, worked out on his back patio with Bruce Lee, and coughed up a Rolls-Royce, as you do, after losing a game of gin rummy to his wife on a plane. Beverly repaid the courtesy by acquiring a couple of pet monkeys for the household. The monkeys, called Moonbeam and Coco, had their own rope-filled enclosure, but often ran free to add to the house’s chaotic anything-goes vibe, even peeing on guests’ heads. Moonbeam, the male, liked to jump onto Coburn’s back when he and Beverly were having sex. “I was not a fan of the monkeys,” says Coburn’s son, James IV. “They got all the attention I wanted. My father just wasn’t into being Superdad. He was an actor and an artist and had his own agenda to deal with.” But Jimmy did get to go to Mexico for the making of Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid, and appears in the film’s river raft sequence. “Look, it was a great life, no question,” he says of his father’s career. “All the actors he worked with, all the films he did – nothing to complain about.

‘Peckinpah remained Coburn’s favourite director despite his addictive extremes. “I got him off alcohol and immediately he started snorting cocaine!” protested Coburn. Yet it was precisely that unhinged quality – at least when aligned with sufficient sobriety – that produced such vibrant cinema. “Sam was a mad genius,” said Coburn. “He would shove you right over into the abyss and sometime he would jump right in after you.”

‘Certainly, Peckinpah inspired what is arguably Coburn’s best performance as the world-weary outlaw-turned-sheriff in Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid. The film remains a woozy mangled masterpiece – even the restored director’s cut – but Coburn’s performance is a hard, clear and beautiful study in disenchantment and self-disgust. In the film’s most poignant scene, a wounded old sheriff (played by Slim Pickens) staggers down to the riverside to die, watched helplessly by his wife. It could so easily be maudlin (the soundtrack is Bob Dylan’s ‘Knocking on Heaven’s Door’), but the effect is heartbreaking, and properly tragic.

‘Steve Saragossi is the author of the first biography of the actor, the upcoming In Like Coburn. He feels that while Coburn never achieved the superstardom of, say, Paul Newman or Clint Eastwood, he did make the transition from classic Hollywood to the post-studio system era more successfully than most. “A lot of Sixties stars couldn’t hack it,” says Saragossi. “Your George Peppards, your Rod Taylors, your Tony Curtises. But actors like McQueen and Coburn were just as good in the postmodern anti-heroic mode as they were in the classic strait-laced heroic mould.” “If you line up Coburn’s roles post-Flint,” says Saragossi, “he played more anti-heroes than anyone you can think of: conman, blackmailer, huckster, outlaw, pickpocket, criminal mastermind, IRA terrorist… He ploughed that trough with abandon, more than Clint Eastwood even.”

‘Watching the Coburn canon again, it’s easy to see why. His expansive lust-for-life charm, seasoned with a little mocking disdain, was perfectly suited to the rogues and scoundrels that flourished in the Nixon era. That vast equine grin was equal to any criminal setback, it seemed. Sergio Leone’s 1971 movie, Duck, You Sucker, is probably the pick of Coburn’s non-Peckinpah films, a billowy meditation on revolution and friendship drenched in dreamy torrents of Ennio Morricone. It contains another favourite Coburn moment – when he watches a firing squad from the shadows, rain dripping off his fedora, and the echoed gunshots send him back into his own tragic past. It’s sublime screen acting – no dialogue, all close-up – the great-souled hero letting us in.’ — Sean Macaulay

 

___
Stills










































































 

___
Further

James Coburn Official Website
James Coburn Official Memorial Fan Club
James Coburn @ IMDb
‘TRIBUTE TO JAMES COBURN’
‘GET TO KNOW JAMES COBURN, THE ULTIMATE SIXTIES TOUGH GUY’
‘Great Conversations: James Coburn’
James Coburn interviewed by Roger Ebert
Quintessential Cool’
‘Was James Coburn “Cured” of Rheumatoid Arthritis?’
‘Top 25 des meilleurs films avec James Coburn’
‘At Home with James Coburn’ @ Architectural Digest
NICK NOLTE AND JAMES COBURN IN CONVERSATION @ Interview
‘Kung Fu Monthly Presents Bruce Lee Tribute By James Coburn, 7″ vinyl, £20.00
James Coburn on Saturday Night Live

 

____
Extras


James Coburn and Sam Peckinpah on Modern Films, Violence


Bruce Lee and James Coburn Chi Sau


Muppet Show – James Coburn and Animal


James Coburn 1977 Schlitz Light Beer Commercial Lite


Joe Mantell plays the drums for his brother James Coburn…


Tombe de James Coburn au Westwood Memorial Park de Los Angeles

 

____
Interview

 

Your character Pop Whitehouse is one of the most loathsome villains to grace a movie screen in recent memory. Did you have trouble shaking him off once the picture wrapped?

JAMES COBURN: Not really, because I got it all out. It’s really when you can’t get it out or when you’re doing it on stage and you have to do it over and over again that it can be troubling. But I learned long ago how to get rid of it by doing it! (laughs) You get it out…villains are really fun to play because they’re usually meatier characters, because they’ve made decisions that haven’t all been very good ones, (laughs) and are paying the price, with a little karma attached. They have something to say, I think. I never play them as a “bad guy.” I play them like I have something to accomplish. In Affliction, it was “I have to get my boys to be men! If they’re not strong men, by God, I’ll beat the shit out of them!” That’s what makes him seem so savage…it’s that conflict. Scripts without conflict are really boring. Characters without conflict are really boring to play, because you’re always trying to catch up with something. And this one was just loaded with conflict. Paul (Schrader) said to Nick and I in the beginning “I’m just gonna let you two guys go after each other!” And we did. We went for it. It was great fun. I’d like to do it all over again.

Is it difficult to go to such a dark place as an actor?

It’s sometimes difficult to find, initially. But as actors, we don’t have to be who we’re playing. That’s one of the good things about being an actor. But, if you let yourself get locked into that, where that character becomes your essence, that’s scary. There was an old film called A Double Life (1947), starring Ronald Coleman, where he became so infected with Othello, that he actually performed it for real, with his own Desdemona. Stella Adler, who I studied with, said “Actors act. They don’t have to be their roles.” On Affliction, we were all joking around between takes, then when we went back to it, boom! We were right back into it again, because it was written so well. It was very straight-on. There was no ambiguity about the characters, and it’s really fun and enriching when that happens. As actors that’s what we try to do, enrich our own beings by absorbing impressions, then generating it out through our craft and giving it to the audience. Truth is obvious, it’s always obvious, isn’t it? Screenplays sometimes hide the truth, which isn’t necessary. You have to give audiences some credit. You don’t have to play around the truth. And what Pop Whitehouse was saying, even though you might hate him for it, was the truth! He knew exactly who he was. He was, nevertheless, afflicted, but he was also very honest.

What was it like studying with Stella Adler?

Great. I actually studied with Jeff Corey out here first. His philosophy was more improvisational. Get away from your ego, get away from lines, things like that. Learn how to play the action of the scene, that’s what improv is really about. Stella, on the other hand, was into style. The style of Shakespeare, modern styles…she’d show you how to do it. You’d see her transform into a raving hag and then into a little girl. Drop of a hat, bang. That’s what I mean about acting. You don’t have to live it. As long as the character doesn’t inhabit you, that’s the kick of acting. De Niro studied with Stella. She was furious with him for putting all that weight for Raging Bull. (laughs)(imitating Stella) “What are you doing to yourself?! You’ll ruin your health!” (laughs). She was very demanding, very hard on women especially. She would just strip you down, peel your ego right off your skin.

Tell us about Sam Peckinpah.

Sam Peckinpah was a genius for four hours a day. The rest of that time he was drunk. He called himself “a working alcoholic,” but he was much more than that. I think the alcohol sort of quelled all the influences that were going on around him so he could really focus on what he was doing with the film. He would shoot with three cameras and just…do it. You never talked with Sam about things like motivation. I asked him one time, when we were doing Major Dundee. I said “Sam, what is it that makes my character tick?” And he thought about it for a minute and finally said “Drier. Dry. He doesn’t give a shit.” And that’s who that character was! And that’s how I played him…It was really sad what happened to that picture. The studio took it away from him and re-cut it. We had a great knife fight in that picture, between Mario Adorf and myself. And it was a viscous fucking knife fight. While we were shooting it, people were yelling for us to stop! That’s how real it looked. It was a terrific piece of action, and it was cut from the film…the night it premiered at the Paramount theater, Sam saw the studio’s cut and was just devastated. His hands were shaking. He had half a pint of whiskey and dropped it. It smashed on the floor. And my wife at the time said “Sam, it’s okay, it’s only a movie.”

When you look at Major Dundee, it’s sort of like looking at the U.S. cut of Pat Garrett, which was also severely compromised by the studio. You can see there’s a masterpiece in there somewhere.

I agree, but what they call the “director’s cut” of Pat Garrett is actually just the television cut. Sam had the only true cut that he made, and that’s up in his archives in Sonoma. When he finished cutting Pat Garrett, it was taken away from him. This was Jim Aubrey at MGM and he was more interested in getting his hotel ready than he was in film. I think he really despised anybody who displayed artistry. He really like digging into them. When we started shooting Pat Garrett, I just finished shooting a film with Blake Edwards called The Carey Treatment (1973) that Aubrey also took away and re-cut. And I said to Sam “This guy’s crazy! He could do this film all sorts of harm.” Sam said “Don’t worry about a thing, Jim. I just bought one share of stock in MGM, and if they mess with me, goddammit, I’ll sue their asses!” (laughs) “One share of stock, Sam?! What’s that gonna do ?!” “You’ll see.” (laughs)

I heard a story that Peckinpah got drunk during the shoot and didn’t want to kill Billy. True?

Yeah, but he wasn’t that drunk. We were sitting in his trailer and he said “Goddammit! Why do we have to kill him?” “Well Sam, that’s the way it happened.” “Well, why can’t we make it un-happen?” “Sam we can’t do it.” (beat) “Why…not?!” (laughs) I think he saw a lot of himself in the character of Billy…We found out halfway through the shoot that most of the masters we had shot were out of focus. We were using five or six cameras at once and we didn’t have a camera mechanic because MGM wouldn’t pay for one! So we used different lenses, different set-ups, and still, it’s all out of focus. Finally the camera mechanic is sent out. It turns out the flange in the camera was off by one one thousandth of an inch, or some damn thing. So we tell Aubrey that we have to re-shoot all these masters. He says “You’re not gonna re-shoot anything. The audience isn’t gonna know the fuckin’ difference!” Can you imagine?! It was just mind-blowing! So what we did was, we stole all those shots when the brass didn’t know we were shooting and got it all! So now this really pissed them off, because now we had some real film on our hands! (laughs) So Sam had his cut previewed, and at the same time, Aubrey had his guys cutting their film. So all the editors got together and gave Sam a cut of his film, but without a soundtrack. He didn’t get that back until he cut it for television. But there’s only about five minutes missing from that cut he originally made.

Tell us about the genesis of The President’s Analyst.

Ted Flicker and I met while we were shooting Charade in Paris. He’d come over to meet with his friend Peter Stone, who’d written the picture. So Ted was sitting in the background with his big black shades, watching us shoot. So Peter introduced us…George Peppard and Elizabeth Ashley were having a Christmas party a few years later. Ted was there. He said “I’ve just finished a script called The President’s Analyst.” I said “That’s an intriguing title. Do you have a deal on it?” He said “No.” So I took it home, read it, and wanted to do it. Ted said he wanted to direct it, so I said “Let me talk to Paramount.” I had just done Waterhole No. 3 (1967) over there. Robert Evans had just taken over, he loved it. Peter Bart read it, loved it. They said “Can he direct?” I said “I dunno, let’s find out.” So they put the whole deal together in five days! It was Evans’ first film at Paramount. There are some great scenes in there. It was named one of the finest political films of the decade by the Sunday Times in London…Ted Flicker never did another movie. He moved out to New Mexico, did one hit TV show, the name of which escapes me, and sculpts, paints. Just finished a script about the Civil War.

I know you were also very close to Bruce Lee. Tell us about Bruce.

Bruce was a true martial artist, created himself, from a little roustabout guy running around the streets of Hong Kong, into this magnificent fighting machine. He truly was an artist. His art had no defensive movements. It was all attack. He was so fast, you couldn’t touch him. He was so fast, he had to slow down for the camera, because it couldn’t catch him! It would look like he hadn’t done anything. (laughs) We wrote a script together called The Silent Flute, with Sterling Silliphant. We all went to India. Everytime we went someplace, Bruce had this pad that he’d hold in one hand and punch with the other! It drove me nuts! (laughs) I said “Bruce, will you cut it out, man?! You’re shaking the whole airplane!” He said “But it make my knuckles hard!” “I know, but it’s pissing me off!” (laughs) Everything he did was related to his art. But he had a great sense of humor, or he did until he went to Hong Kong. He came back from Hong Kong one time, and he was always very outspoken about martial arts. “This martial arts in Hong Kong is bullshit,” he said, because there was no bodily contact. “Judo good. Ju-jitsu good. Aikido, best. But this other stuff, no good.” So we’d go to these tournaments and he’d spout off…he was back in Hong Kong, and was invited to this tournament that was televised, as an observer. He was famous, and controversial, as being an outspoken martial artists. So they were breaking boards and ice with their heads…Bruce said “That’s not martial arts.” So they said “Why don’t you show us your idea of martial arts…” So they taped up three thick pine boards. So he held it out and side kicked it, and everything went flying into the air, knocked one of the lightbulbs out way up. Sparks came flying down…it was one of those great, dynamic moments! And the next day, the papers were filled with this! From that, both Run Run Shaw and Raymond Chow, who were big film producers there, made him offers to do films there. So he came back and we were having dim sum at the Golden Door down in Chinatown, and he’s telling me all this. He said “They want me to do this TV series at Warner Brothers called Kung-Fu. But I’m also getting these offers in Hong Kong. What should I do?” So I thought about it for a minute, because he really wasn’t a good actor. But he had great dynamic presence and had this macho attitude that he could play really well…but that would be very tiresome watching for an hour on television. Plus he spoke with a very heavy Chinese accent. So I said “Go back to Hong Kong and make southeast Asian movies. You’ll be huge star.” “But I want to work here.” I said “You want to be a movie star, right? It’s what you’ve always wanted.” He thought for a minute and said “I want to make more money than Steve McQueen.” (laughs) So he went to southeast Asia, David Carradine did Kung-Fu in slow motion, Bruce became a huge movie star and made more money than Steve McQueen. Strange story…Anyway, then I get a call one morning from Sterling Silliphant saying “Bruce is dead.” I didn’t believe him, but I learned that a couple months before he’d come home and passed out in between really these really intense workouts that he was doing. And this girl that he was with couldn’t wake him up. He went to all of these doctors who told him “Your body’s perfect, you’re just over-worked.” He went back and within six weeks he was dead of an edema of the brain. And that was that…

What do you think of the state of most Hollywood films today?

I’m from the Billy Wilder school. Somebody asked him “Do you ever go to movies?” He said “No.” They said “Why not?” Wilder said (German accent)”Build da set, blow it up! Boom!” (laughs) Finally, they’ve gotten rid of the actors.

 

__________________
20 of James Coburn’s 70 roles

_______________
John Sturges The Magnificent Seven (1960)
‘There’s a famous scene in The Magnificent Seven in which the James Coburn character, Britt, proves his claim that in a showdown in which his opponent is armed with a pistol and he is armed with a knife, he can kill his opponent by throwing his knife into him faster than his opponent can draw and fire his gun. On the special features track of the DVD, Coburn says that he received knife throwing lessons from a stuntman, Richard Farnsworth, who went on to have a successful acting career of his own. Coburn regularly practiced his throw in his bedroom, making his wife nervous. But how plausible is this scene? Plausible enough for a Hollywood movie, in which through the magic of editing the knife has barely left Coburn’s hand when it is shown sticking out of the gunman’s chest.’ — Bowie Knife Fights, Fighters, and Fighting Techniques


Excerpt


Is the skill of James Coburn of “The Magnificent Seven” possible??

 

_______________
John Sturges The Great Escape (1963)
‘In July, Sturges showed the rushes of the first six weeks shooting, and McQueen decided his part was minor and undeveloped. He was particularly upset that his character virtually disappears from the film for about 30 minutes in the middle so he walked out demanding rewrites. Sturges admitted the half-hour gap was likely a problem, but with the production already behind schedule due to the heavy rain, he felt he couldn’t take time out to do rewrites and rescheduling. Co-star James Garner said he and cast member James Coburn got together with McQueen to determine what his specific gripes were. Garner later said it was apparent McQueen wanted to be the hero but didn’t want to be seen doing anything overtly heroic that contradicted his character’s cool detachment and sardonic demeanour. At the same time, McQueen never really liked his character’s calm acquiescence to his time in the cooler or the famous bit with the catcher’s mitt and ball. Sturges considered writing the character out of the story altogether, but United Artists informed him they considered McQueen indispensable to the picture’s success and would spring for the extra money to hire another writer, Ivan Moffit, to deal with the star’s demands. McQueen returned to work.’ — The Great Escape Locations


Trailer


Excerpt

 

________________
Stanley Donen Charade (1963)
‘This film is often called the “best Hitchcock movie Hitchcock didn’t make” because although the film feels like Hitchcock, it was actually directed by Stanley Donen. But Charade is Hitchcockian on purpose. Donen meant it as an homage and near-spoof of Hitchcock’s films, especially those with Cary Grant. As Donen later said, “I always wanted to make a movie like one of my favorites, North by Northwest [1959]. What I admired most was the wonderful story of the mistaken identity of the leading man. They mistook him for somebody who didn’t exist; he could never prove he wasn’t somebody who wasn’t alive. I searched [for something with] the same idiom of adventure, suspense and humor.”’ — The Blonde at the Film


Excerpt


Excerpt

 

________________
Arthur Hiller The Americanization of Emily (1964)
‘The lively but somehow slightly distasteful The Americanization of Emily stars James Garner as a WWII naval officer who happens to be a craven coward. While his comrades sail off to their deaths, Garner makes himself scarce, generally hiding out in the London flat of his lothario navy buddy James Coburn. Garner falls in love with virtuous war widow Julie Andrews (the “Emily” of the title), but she can’t abide his yellow streak. Meanwhile, crack-brained admiral Melvyn Douglas decides that he needs a hero–the first man to die on Omaha Beach during the D-Day Invasion. Coburn is at first elected for this sacrifice, but it is the quivering Garner who ends up hitting the beach. He survives to become a hero in spite of himself, winning Andrews in the process. Paddy Chayefsky’s script, based on the novel by William Bradford Huie, attempts to extract humor out of the horrors of war by using broad, vulgar comedy instead of the light satirical touch that would seem to be called for. Americanization of Emily was Julie Andrews’ second film; it should have led to a steady stream of adult-oriented roles, but the box-office clout of Mary Poppins and The Sound of Music consigned her to “wholesome family entertainment”.’ — Hal Erickson, Rovi


Trailer


James Coburn on “The Americanization of Emily”

 

_______________
Tony Richardson The Loved One (1965)
‘Since the merchandisers of The Loved One are boastfully proclaiming it to be an outrageous motion picture with something to offend everyone, I see no reason to deny their exultation. It IS an offensive film—but for reasons other than the boldness and indelicacy of its theme or, indeed, for the many insensitive and impious things it shows. As a screen version of the famous novel of the same name by Evelyn Waugh that was one of the first blistering satires on the so-called American way of death, this latest piece of social comment from Tony Richardson, which came to the Cinema I yesterday, is inevitably startling and tough. Its candid and glittering expositions of the fantastic funeral rituals that are practiced in some of the gaudy graveyards in the vicinity of Hollywood are naturally shocking and disturbing when so vividly and vulgarly revealed and when shown with such wry appreciation of their commercial sham as Mr. Richardson shows them here.’ — Bosley Crowther, NYT


Trailer


The Loved One/ Making Of …Featurette

 

______________
Daniel Mann Our Man Flint (1966)
Our Man Flint (1966) presents the fantasy world of Bond as seen through the willfully silly prism of the 60s pop movement. It absolutely wallows in its campy aesthetic, giving us 007 by way of Adam West’s Batman. As the film begins, we learn via some grubby stock footage and model work that something is wreaking havoc with the weather. A group of mad scientists are holding the world hostage, threatening to melt the ice caps and destroy Life As We Know It. They also turn women into sex slaves. Why not. The Zonal Organization for World Intelligence and Espionage (Z.O.W.I.E., natch) fires up its UNIVAC supercomputer to find a solution, and the computer spits out the name of the one man who can stop the evil plot: Derek Flint. Flint’s former boss, Lloyd C. Cramden (Lee J Cobb) is reluctant to bring him in; it seems Flint is an unconventional loose cannon who plays by his own rules! Flint, a rich swinger with a private jet and four live-in girlfriends or sister wives or something, could give shit about the world being threatened, and turns down the job a number of times, plenty busy with his karate and fencing and screwing. But when someone tries to kill him with a poison dart while he’s out dancing with his four ladies, it’s on. Flint chases down leads around the globe with a preternatural intuition that would make Sherlock Holmes envious. Conferring with British agent 0008 (a ringer for Sean Connery), he learns the identity of the secret terrorist organization behind the plot and sets out to stop them from using their weather-controlling device against the governments of the world. Lives are saved, women are objectified, there’s a weird stand-off between the scientists and Flint, where he rejects their idea of a scientifically-engineered Utopia because FREE WILL, and credits are rolled.’ — Birth. Movies. Death.


Trailer


Excerpt


Excerpt

 

______________
Blake Edwards What Did You Do in the War, Daddy? (1966)
What Did You Do in the War, Daddy? is one of the mildly satirical, mostly slapstick WWII comedies that came out in the spate of ‘60s war dramas. A lot of movies were about special teams with difficult assignments, and many of these adopted at least a partly insubordinate tone about ragtag misfits, such as Steve McQueen’s character The Great Escape or the cast of The Dirty Dozen. The ideas are that regular officers are incompetent and war is hell, but rugged individuals can have a grand time. No movies were mentioning Vietnam yet (The Green Berets was 1968), but the shadow of its restless, unspoken presence looms dimly. Edwards had pioneered the modern WWII comedy with Operation Petticoat, a success beyond all reason, and here he applies himself to the Allies’ 1943 invasion of Sicily, depicted with sweeping footage of legions of soldiers assaulting the coast of California. Captain Lionel Cash (Dick Shawn), a spit-and-polish by-the-booker with no combat experience, is assigned to lead a weary platoon in capturing a strategic village. The jolly Italian army captain (Sergio Fantoni) is happy to surrender, but first the town must have its festival—a lengthy, loud, frantic setpiece anticipating The Party. One complication and crossed purpose leads to another, and soon the soldiers are staging a fake battle for a newsreel camera, as directed by loosey-goosey Lt. Christian (James Coburn), and then the German army shows up to take everyone prisoner while one Major Pott (Harry Morgan) wanders the underground catacombs losing his mind. There’s also much sexy business with the mayor’s daughter (Giovanna Ralli) and roles for Aldo Ray, Carroll O’Connor, Leon Askin, and Vito Scotti.’ — Pop Matters


Excerpt

 

______________
Bernard Girard Dead Heat on a Merry-Go-Round (1966)
‘Aside from a poetically justifiable title, Dead Heat on a Merry-Go-Round, which turned up yesterday at the Victoria and Festival Theatres, has the refreshing temerity to thumb its nose figuratively at laws and gaily get away with it. James Coburn, who successfully entered the James Bond school of daredeviltry in Our Man Flint, has another vehicle to fit his newly found, profitable talents. Bernard Girard, the writer-director, and Carter DeHaven, the producer, making their film debuts have come up with a convoluted yarn that eventually unravels quite easily. Mr. Coburn is a lovable, craggy-faced, toothy schemer whose machinations carry conviction despite an unlikely story. Camilla Sparv, as the lissome blonde he marries; Marian Moses, as the psychiatrist; Nina Wayne, as a curvacious, dumb maid, and Rose Marie, as a widow he bilks, give him natural assistance. Aldo Ray, Michael Strong and Severn Darden, as his helpmates, and Robert Webber, as a government security aide, lend helping hands along the way.’ — NYT


Trailer

 

______________
Gordon Douglas In Like Flint (1967)
‘There’s really been only one rival to James Bond: Derek Flint. That’s because of James Coburn’s special brand of American cool. He’s so cool, in fact, that he doesn’t care to save the world. That is, until he’s personally threatened. He’s a true libertarian, with more gadgets and girls than Bond, but with none of his stress or responsibility. There was bound to be a Flint sequel, and In Like Flint (1967) delivers the same kind of zany fun as its predecessor. Flint is recruited once again by Lee J. Cobb to be the government’s top secret agent, this time to solve a mishap involving the President. Turns out, the Chief Executive has been replaced by an evil duplicate. The new plan for world domination involves feminine aggression, and Flint, with his overpowering charisma, is just the man to turn the hostile forces around. In Like Flint is still over the top, but some of the novelty has worn off, and it doesn’t have quite the same edge as the original. Even Jerry Goldsmith’s score is a bit more subdued. But the film still has James Coburn and that funny phone.’ — Bill Desowitz


Trailer


Excerpt


James Coburn interview for IN LIKE FLINT

 

________________
Ted Flicker The President’s Analyst (1967)
‘Every month the little TeleBriefs magazine comes with your phone bill. It is the most relentlessly bright, cute and friendly publication in the world. It is the Doris Day of the printed word. It is filled with stories of heroic telephone operators hauling dogs out of the river. It is overdone. One of the world’s largest corporations trying to be folksy is like Godzilla giving Lassie a Milk Bone. The President’s Analyst fights back against the phone company and its accomplice, J. Edgar Hoover and his Electric G-Men. It is one of the funniest movies of the year, ranking with The Graduate and Bedazzled in the sharp edge of its satire. James Coburn stars as an analyst who is called in to give the President someone to talk to. This makes problems. The President is the loneliest man in the world. But the President’s analyst is lonelier, especially since the FBI bugs his room and the CIA hires his girlfriend. Writer and director Theodore Flicker’s satire is modern and biting, and there are many fine, subtle touches in the film. All of the FBI agents are clean-cut, sharp-jawed, impeccably groomed men of exactly 4 feet, 11 inches tall. And when Coburn is kidnapped by the phone company, there is a nauseatingly pleasant young man who lectures him on why the phone company is his friend. To accompany the lecture, there are animated cartoons like a TV commercial — but done in a peculiar way so all the little dancing men look uncoordinated.’ — Roger Ebert


Trailer


Excerpt


Excerpt


Excerpt

 

______________
Christian Marquand Candy (1968)
‘A spoof of Voltaire’s Candide, Candy manages to make almost each and every one of these people look like an idiot. Watch all of this film and you’ll wonder how any of them managed to move on with their careers after such a horrific experience. The loosely constructed story follows the erotic journey of naïve schoolgirl Candy (Aulin). Basically she goes from location to location as she seeks for truth and meaning in life. The only real result is that a bunch of strange and sleazy guys boff her. I suppose that I could elaborate more about the different characters Candy encounters, but what’s the point? They’re all wild parodies of different sorts. Actually, in the early parts of the film, it’s mad broadness almost seems fun. Our first main guest star is Richard Burton as heartthrob poet McPhisto. He offers such a self-mocking and over the top performance that the movie briefly – and I do mean briefly – looks like it might be something interesting. After that, unfortunately, Candy crashes. Essentially the plot follows Candy from sexual partner to sexual partner, and next she gets it on with her family’s Mexican gardener Emmanuel, played by Ringo Starr, the least Mexican man on the planet. I suppose this casting is supposed to be some sort of sly comment on something, but the ultimate result is nothing more than one of the worst performances committed to film. As a Beatle fan of many years, it pained me to see Ringo offer this insanely lame piece of work. Well, at least he got to grope Aulin. Once Ringo leaves the film, we move from one nutty character to another, all with the same results: sex and alleged merriment. Possibly the nadir accompanied Walter Matthau’s bug-eyed General Smight. In addition to the bad pun and weak performance by Matthau, this segment provides some of the movie’s more heavy-handed “commentary”. The usual “army equals bad” mentality of the era comes into play as we learn that Smight controls a squad that lives in a plane that never lands; they constantly fly so they can be ready for action. That’s supposed to be wicked satire? It felt like little more than warmed-over Strangelove.’ — Colin Jacobson


the entire film

 

_______________
Sergio Leone Duck, You Sucker (1971)
‘Up to 1971, Sergio Leone’s films suggested meaning through their operatic tone and lack of dialogue; silence, however long held during a standoff, adds implied depth without words. Zapata or “Spaghetti” Westerns can contain social commentaries (often on America’s capitalist obsession with money and the robbery thereof), but are primarily tooled for stylistic capacity. Often, political events are used as plot devices—for example, one feels the Civil War interlude in Leone’s The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly may be out of place and that the brief political statements in these few scenes do not vastly affect the rest of the picture. Not so with Leone’s last great Western, Duck, You Sucker (Giù la testa) formerly known as A Fistful of Dynamite, and what in Leone’s hopes would have been called Once Upon a Time … the Revolution. Opening titles show a quote from Marxist political leader Mao Tse-tung that reads: “The revolution is not a social dinner, a literary event, a drawing board or an embroidery; it can not be done with elegance and courtesy. The revolution is an act of violence…” With this warning launches Leone’s most established, yet least personal film. After artistic and financial successes from his hugely popular ‘The Man with No Name’ Trilogy, Leone’s Duck, You Sucker humanizes his protagonists, otherwise skewed by Zapata temperament. It is also his most clearly political film. In a meandering plot, much like The Good, the Bad and the Ugly’s, Leone introduces antiheroes galore. Rather than Tuco (Ugly) and Blondie (Good), we get Rod Steiger’s thieving Mexican Juan Miranda and his reluctant partner John Mallory—an ex-Irish revolutionary and explosives expert played by James Coburn. Together, in Leone’s grandiose, episodic Western style, the two seek to rob an idyllic bank in Mesa Verde. Like a diptych, another panel opens when their robbery plans go awry and thrust them deep into the Mexican Revolution of 1913, where Miranda’s false heroism brings him celebrity and Mallory’s explosives provide ample bang.’ — Deep Focus Review


Excerpt


Excerpt

 

________________
Sam Peckinpah Pat Garrett & Billy the Kid (1973)
‘Sam Peckinpah’s Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid is a towering, unfinished masterpiece and one of the saddest movies I have ever seen. A compromised work about how compromise eats the soul, it has a boozy, slouchy grandeur that troubles your dreams for weeks after the closing credits roll. This is Peckinpah’s final word on a genre he helped to define, and what a hopeless, despairing word that is. It’s the greatest movie you almost never got a chance to see. On paper, Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid looked like a slam-dunk proposition. The director of The Wild Bunch headed back out west for this oft-filmed tale of two old friends finding themselves on opposite sides of the law when capitalist robber-barons and government stooges started putting fences up all around the high country. Working from an acerbic script by cult novelist Rudy Wurlitzer, this bitterly revisionist take starred James Coburn as outlaw-turned-Sheriff Pat Garrett, assisted here by a posse of veteran old-timey Western character actors such as Jack Elam, Katy Jurado, Chill Wills and Slim Pickens. For maximum counter-culture kick, Billy the Kid was played by hunky, hugely popular singer-songwriter Kris Kristofferson, with his gang of rebels filled out by Kristofferson’s touring band, Kris’ wife Rita Coolidge, plus other early 1970s music scene denizens including Harry Dean Stanton and some twitchy little cat named Bob Dylan. (Obsessed with Billy the Kid, Dylan reportedly begged Wurlitzer to write him a small role in the movie and composed the film’s haunting, dirge-like score.) What could possibly go wrong?’ — The Artery


Trailer


Excerpt

 

________________
Walter Hill Hard Times (1975)
‘Hill and his co-writers pack a lot of memorable scenes into the film’s scant 93 minute running time. Aided by editor Roger Spottiswood (another future director) and cinematographer Philip Lathrop, Hill makes every frame of the film count. There isn’t a slow moment or a meaningless line of dialogue. Clearly the highlights are the action sequences. This is Fight Club for the Baby Boomer generation. Bronson, who was in his 50s at the time, performs all of his own gut-wrenching fight scenes, along with co-stars Robert Tessier and Nick Dimitri. They are brutal affairs that will quickly convince you that these men are actually beating each other up. The stunt coordination is among the best I’ve seen in any film. The film’s more whimsical sequences are aided immeasurably by Barry DeVorzon’s addictive score. With Hard Times, Bronson reached the pinnacle of his acting career. It’s wonderful to see him reunited with Coburn, his co-star from The Magnificent Seven and The Great Escape. However, Coburn became even more interesting as an actor as he grew older whereas Bronson grabbed for the low-hanging fruit and began to concentrate primarily on by-the-numbers action movies. The film remains a testament to his abilities as an actor- and credit Walter Hill for bringing those out in full force.’ — Cine Mareto


Excerpt

 

_______________
Sam Peckinpah Cross of Iron (1977)
‘Peckinpah wasn’t exactly the go-to guy for fluffy comfort viewing, and the war scenes are as searing and brutal as you’d expect – despite the production’s limited budget. While it is brilliantly filmed, though, Cross of Iron’s big battle sequence drags on for so long that it feels as if Peckinpah is trying to match minute for minute the pace of the actual German retreat. As the troops fall back, Stransky makes sure Steiner’s platoon don’t get their orders, abandoning them in territory that the Soviets have just recaptured.’ — The Guardian


Trailer


Excerpt

 

_____________
Michael Crichton Looker (1981)
Looker is a 1981 science fiction film written and directed by Michael Crichton. It starred Albert Finney, Susan Dey, and James Coburn. Former NFL linebacker Tim Rossovich was featured as the villain’s main henchman. The film is a suspense/science fiction piece that comments upon and satirizes media, advertising, TV’s effects on the populace, and a ridiculous standard of beauty. Though spare in visual effects, the film is notable for being the first commercial film to attempt to make a realistic computer-generated character, for the model named Cindy. It was also the first film to create three-dimensional (3D) shading with a computer, months before the release of the better-known Tron.’ — collaged


Trailer

 

______________
Richard Donner Maverick (1994)
Maverick is a 1994 American Western comedy film directed by Richard Donner and written by William Goldman, based on the 1950s television series of the same name created by Roy Huggins. The film stars Mel Gibson as Bret Maverick, a card player and con artist collecting money to enter a high-stakes poker game. He is joined in his adventure by Annabelle Bransford (Jodie Foster), another con artist, and lawman Marshall Zane Cooper (James Garner). The supporting cast features Graham Greene, James Coburn, Alfred Molina and a large number of cameo appearances by Western film actors, country music stars and other actors. The film received a favorable critical reception for its light-hearted charm, and was financially successful, earning over $180 million during its theatrical run. Costume designer April Ferry was nominated for the Academy Award for Best Costume Design.’ — collaged


Trailer

 

______________
Tom Shadyac The Nutty Professor (1996)
‘For those who have not seen The Nutty Professor, the film is a remake of the 1963’s film of the same name directed by Jerry Lewis and is also an adaptation of the novel Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson. The Nutty Professor, which was released in 1996, was written by David Sheffield, Barry W. Blaustein, Tom Shadyac, and Steve Oedekerk. Tom Shadyac also directed the film. Eddie Murphy, Jada Pinkett Smith, James Coburn, Larry Miller, Dave Chappelle, and John Ales star in the film. In The Nutty Professor, Sherman Klump (Eddie Murphy), an obese college professor, takes an experimental weight loss drug to win over a young woman.’ — collaged


Excerpt


Excerpt

 

_______________
Paul Schrader Affliction (1997)
‘Nolte and Coburn are magnificent in this film, which is like an expiation or amends for abusive men. It is revealing to watch them in their scenes together–to see how they’re able to use physical presence to sketch the history of a relationship. Schrader says he cast Coburn because he needed an actor who was big enough, and had a “great iconic weight,” to convincingly dominate Nolte. He found one. Coburn has spent a career largely in shallow entertainments, and here he rises to the occasion with a performance of power. There is a story about that. “I met with Coburn before the picture began,” Schrader told me, “and told him how carefully Nolte prepares for a role. I told Coburn that if he walked through the movie, Nolte might let him get away with it for a day, but on the second day all hell would break lose. Coburn said, ‘Oh, you mean you want me to really act? I can do that. I haven’t often been asked to, but I can.’ He can.’ — Roger Ebert


Excerpt


Excerpt


James Coburn Wins Supporting Actor: 1999 Oscars

 

_______________
Alan Jacobs American Gun (2002)
‘It’s a shame about American Gun, really. Though it features a fantastic lead performance from James Coburn (in his final film role) and a genuinely involving mystery, the film completely falls apart in the last 15 minutes thanks to an incredibly silly plot twist. Writer/director Alan Jacobs clearly has issues with guns and gun control, and eventually turns his film into an issue-oriented think piece. Right up until that fatal last reel, American Gun is a mostly engaging and intriguing character study of an expectedly determined man. Anchored by a particularly strong performance from Coburn, the deliberate pace of the movie effectively establishes Tillman as someone’s whose motives we can understand. Though Jacobs’ style occasionally resembles that of a TV movie (ie a montage of Tillman and his wife doing various things after their daughter dies) and he’s certainly guilty of overusing flashbacks, he effectively takes his time in laying the entire story out. The slow build allows us to sympathize with Tillman to the extent where we genuinely care about him.’ — Reel Film


Trailer

 

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** Thomas Moronic, Hey Thomas, old pal. I’m obviously very happy you’re a fellow lover of Darius’s book. And awesome that the Bret podcast had the all-time best effect that anything could have. Happy writing! I’d love to hear more, man. ** David Ehrenstein, Hi. I certainly know about the ugly, depressing Jussie Smollet situation, although I don’t know how covered it is in the French media. And Trow loved ‘Negrophobia’, which is, yes, pretty hot. ** James, Hi, man. You def. won’t regret reading ‘Negrophobia’. Yes, major suckage about our heating. Our apartment’s owner is no saint. She’s doing everything she can to avoid paying for a new heating unit while we sit here freezing and begging. The soonest we’ll get relief is early next week. In the meantime, it’s 24/7 brr. Cool, when it’s time, let me know, and I’ll pass along my real world mailing addy. Having an agent makes things infinitely easier if the often huge hassle of getting one isn’t a huge hassle. I don’t have a ‘4 books’ post in-process yet, but I will soon. The BEE podcast is up and listenable as of yesterday. Thanks, buddy, and love back. ** Sypha, Cool re: the timing. Your writing question: For me, the emotional engagement doesn’t kick in usually until I start the actual writing. I find that my writing naturally goes for what’s emotionally engaging, and I just guide/follow its needs. So, yeah, I would say just start the thing, and I would imagine you’ll get pulled towards the aspect of the project for which you have feels naturally. Does it not work that way for you normally? Me too: I just joined Patreon for the first time so I could hear myself. ** Bill, It’s a pretty must read. My NyQuil was confiscated because the bottle was just slightly over the size restriction thing, the bastards. No, there’s nothing like it here. NyQuil has too much of something that France forbids. And yet this is a country where you can buy codeine-laced paracetamol over the counter. Heads up if any video or sound evidence of your gig pops up please. ** Brendan, Hi, B. No, as I just told Bill, there’s something in NyQuil’s ingredients that doesn’t fly here legally. Not sure what, but there’s no equivalent, and NyQuil is kind of a ‘miracle drug’ for me when I have a cold, even if the miracle is psychological, which it probably is. No, I don’t believe I know Naomi Punk at all. Huh. Okay, I trust you like the back of my hand — that makes no sense, but … — so I’ll go fill up on their stuff right away. Thanks a lot! Love, me. ** _Black_Acrylic, ‘Negrophobia’ should be on everyone’s shelf, especially the shelf of a stylish brainiac like you. Thanks a bunch about the podcast. Christ, it’s lengthy though. ** Nik, Hey, N. New York Review Books republished it. Francis Ponge is fantastic. Wow, nice assignment there. Now I need to go reread him and make a post or something. Cool, cool, about the film plans. Very excited to hear how that goes. Like I guess I said, the fear of imitating other writers is the only real fear. It rarely happens. Sometimes you can feel like what you’re written is overly imitative, but it’s rare that others see that. Interesting stuff. No, I have not read your story only because my traveling prevented concentration of a suitable sort, and because I think I’m only today almost cleared out of jetlag, so I’ll do that straight away. Thanks for the nudge. I’m up to having to do a bunch of stuff for the press release for the upcoming French theater release of ‘PGL’ and for its US DVD, and, as of Monday, I’ll probably be back to working on the TV script since we have a no doubt momentous meeting with ARTE on Monday morning. ** Steve Erickson, Hi. My understanding is that Darius never wrote another novel, or hasn’t yet. He’s been writing short pieces and theater works and stuff. I like the series’ title. Metal musician … ? Oh, right, yes, ha ha, mum’s still the word, I’m afraid. ** Misanthrope, A good add. My guess is that Mr. Ehrenstein would know the story behind that title change. We have yet to spring for a space heater, but it’s getting dire enough inside that it might be a choiceless decision. Staying warm means dressing like I’m back in Antartica, which sounds more amusing than it feels. Thanks, G. ** Aaron Nielsen, My great pleasure, Aaron. ** Corey Heiferman, I started the p.s. a little late today, so you got in. It’s fantastic: the book. Thanks about the warmth that I hope to find then stay within by means as yet unavailable. Happy Friday! ** Okay. Someone, whom I’m not quite remembering, wrote to me requesting that I bring this old James Coburn-centric post back to life, and it seemed like a potentially odd yet capital idea, so I did. See you tomorrow.

Nastassja Kinski Day

 

‘Nastassja Kinski was 15 when she was put in juvenile prison. For years she had been stealing, shoplifting little presents for her mother, the sorts of things her father would once come home with – bits of jewellery, watches, chains – things she believed would make her mother happy again, “like I remembered her when I was little”. As though these things were as central to her mother as food. A lot of the time she would get away with it, but at other times she was caught, and then there would be paperwork and forms to fill in and visits to the police to be made. “Except mum wouldn’t take me. I think she thought it would go away. Then I started doing movies.”

‘And so, when she was spotted by Wim Wenders’ wife at a rock-and-roll competition and offered a part in Wenders’ film, Wrong Movement, she said, “Yes”. In fact what she actually said was: “You’ll have to ask my mum.” Which is just poignant and sad. There followed, at age 14, a lead part in Reifenzeugnis, a hugely successful series on German television, directed by Wolfgang Petersen, later of Das Boot fame; she was cast as a schoolgirl who has a love affair with her teacher. Already, it was apparent, this strange tension in her nature: the child who grew up too fast. Already, this was being translated, by the adults around her, into a mystery, a seduction: the child as savage in relation to the world, unleashing uncontrollable primeval urges.

‘How much did she know of what was being made of her? Probably very little. She was no Bardot, no wild creature of the elements. Bardot came from a bourgeois background, she knew enough of the rules to be able to jettison them. Nastassja knew no rules. Her only model was anarchy. She longed for conformity, for domesticity. You see this clearly in Avedon’s portrait of her when she was about 22, naked except for a python draped around her body. How it is possible to look domestic with a snake wrapped through your legs and around your neck is a mystery. But the two of them managed it. The picture is stylised, tame.

‘Polanksi saw it immediately. Recognised the need and contacted her with a view to casting her as Tess, a part he had originally conceived for his wife, the late Sharon Tate. You can imagine he had a particular interest now in a story about a woman who loses her baby and her life. He sent Nastassja to Lee Strasberg’s studio to improve her English and her accent. “He took a lot of time, two years,” she says, “preparing me for that film.”

‘The film, which was released in 1979, made her. What Ingrid Bergman was to the 40s and Julie Christie to the 60s, Nastassja Kinski was to the 80s: the face of the time. Five years later, when Wenders’ Paris, Texas came out – to great acclaim for Kinski and her co-star Harry Dean Stanton, and written by Sam Shepard, the leading American playwright of the day – you would have thought her future fixed. Then, just as suddenly, it was over.

‘She was never reconciled with her father Klaus Kinski. Over the years, she saw him only rarely, and towards the end they were not speaking at all. When he died in 1991 from a stroke, there was no regret. “Maybe a minute. No, 30 seconds.” She didn’t go to his funeral. The last time she had heard from him was when he telephoned to ask her to be in a movie with him. “That’s why he contacted me. Business.” She doesn’t love him. How could she? Imagine, she says – being a father who has never in his whole life done anything right. Who never saw her children. “Not even a picture. That’s pitiful, it really is. He had eyes like hell and the sky at the same time.”

‘At the moment, she is edging back into film, playing bit parts – or love interest, which she’s not very good at. As she says, “too detached”. She knows there will always be some director willing to use her name, her beauty – she is more beautiful than ever, as though time has somehow reversed to soften her features. But the question is, can her persona ever again achieve the force of the early years.’ — The Guardian

 

____
Stills





















































 

______
Further

Nastassja Kinski Official Website
Nostalgia Kinky: Celebrating Nastassja Kinski
Extraits d’une vie, a Nastassja Kinski Fan Site
Nastassja KInski: Visual Website
Nastassja Kinski @ IMDb
Japanese Nastassja Kinski Fan Site (in English)
‘Nastassja Kinski, Still a Daddy’s Girl’
Nastassja KInski @ mubi
Nastasja Kinski: Box Office Data
Nastassja Kinski @ Famous People with Narcolepsy

 

_______
Extras


NK interviewed on David Letterman, 1982


NK dances with Marcello Mastroianni, 1978


NK sings Tom Waits’ ‘Little Boy Blue’


Sparks ‘That’s Not Nastassja’ (live, 2008)

 

_______
Interview

 

So, I say to Nastassja Kinski, tell me about that story I’ve read about you and Paul Schrader, your director on Cat People (1982); the one in which you break off your romance with him and say: “Paul, I always f- my directors. And with you, it was difficult.”

The dreaminess disappears from Kinski’s grey-green eyes, and her melancholy, oddly tentative voice takes on an edge: “You know what,” she says, crumbling the remains of a blueberry muffin, “that’s one of those idiotic, unbelievable things where you go: ‘What! Where does that come from?’ I never, ever said anything remotely like that. Plus I never?’ She pauses, considers. “Well, maybe there was one person I worked with that I had a relationship with. No other director, ever, ever.”

But it’s pity, really, to disown the story, I say; it’s such a good put-down. “Give it to somebody else – it’s not mine.” The German-born actress laughs, as she often does. “But it could not be further from who I am or what I actually said. You know what I think? I think people imagined so many things, put together so many interpretations when they saw me, years ago. And it’s just so many fantasies.”

When people did see Nastassja Kinski, back in 1982, they saw one of the most beautiful women in the world. They saw a woman who had appeared, clad only in a snake, in a Richard Avedon photograph that decorated thousands on thousands of students’ bedrooms. And, by 1984, they saw a woman who had made the lustrously memorable Paris, Texas and who was, it seemed, certain to become the most famous film star in the world.

“Oh I know!” says Kinski, her American English flecked with the seductive accents of a cosmopolitan upbringing. “And sometimes you wonder what happened. And I don’t really know. You do right choices, and you do wrong choices. I just went on living, and things happened. And that’s why I feel that now I’ve done The Claim [her latest film] with all these wonderful actors, it’s such a relief. Because you can’t always do things of such quality; I can’t say that happens all the time. It doesn’t. It hasn’t – not for me.” She’s referring, here, to the eight years she spent, from 1984 to 1992, sacrificing her career on the tainted altar of second-rate Italian films. But she’s also referring to the fact that, at the age of 23, she became pregnant, had a son, Aliosha, and married his father, an Egyptian film producer named Ibrahim Moussa.

The couple also had a daughter, Sonia, now 14, but divorced in 1992 and are currently at war: Kinski refers to him as “that person”. Kinski has another daughter, Kenya, aged six, by Quincy Jones, the record producer. She and Jones are no longer together; their relationship, however, is “fine”. Still, many actresses have children when they’re 23 and pursue super-stardom as relentlessly as they did before their pregnancy. Kinski, the abandoned child, was different. “I never had a family,” she says, “and what I always wanted was my family. And now that I had little kids, that’s what I wanted to do: to be there. And not not be there.”

And not not be there – like her father and, in reality, her mother, Biggi. Kinski used once to rhapsodise about her relationship with her mother: “She’s like the sun coming up to me. In this jungle around us she protects me, like the lion’s mother. When we talk, it’s total ecstasy.” Now, though, they don’t speak. “I try to talk to her,” Kinski tells me, “but she doesn’t talk to me. She decided to go another way, she chose a different life from being with us.” Biggi was against Nastassja’s marriage and has rarely seen her daughter’s children. She is often referred to as a poet: ‘She does write, and I think her poems are beautiful. But she never publishes. Because I think she’s scared. So it’s safer to keep it all to herself. But I say to her, to be alive is to communicate.’ Kinski thinks for a moment: ‘And I’ve told my mother, life is not endless, and I really want you to be fulfilled – but anyone can say sorry later.”

There is, it seems, a mother-lode of sorrow and high drama in Kinski’s life. Before our interview, she had sat for more than half an hour, hidden behind the tinted windows of a black limousine, talking into her mobile. At length, the car door opened and she appeared, the Motorola Nextel still clutched to her chestnut-brown hair. Gesticulating fiercely, she paced up and down the Hollywood pavement, a blue-grey sleeveless Puffa jacket over her light-blue shirt, a large Louis Vuitton bag slung over her shoulder. She was agitated, and she was emphatic; later, on her knees before the photographic shoot, she continued her impassioned dialogue over the mobile, urgent and distraught: “I don’t want to hear this,” she said, “I don’t want to hear this. . . I’m putting so much love and so much care and so much time. . . It just makes me sad. . .”

Over Kinski hovers the fearful cloud of her aberrant father and his abandonment of her. Fittingly, in Tess, she is abandoned; in One From The Heart (1982), she is abandoned; in Paris, Texas (1984), she is abandoned; and in The Claim, she and her baby daughter are abandoned by her husband in favour of the rights to a gold strike. “Really,” she tells me, “I yearned for a sturdy, steady lifestyle.” Instead, while he was with her, her father gave her a whiff of the high glamour and the rootless lunacy of the film world. (He also gave her a dog, Sarah, with which she used to sleep; later, it was poisoned.) According to his almost pornographic autobiography, Kinski Uncut, Kinski père’s grotesque appetite for sex, sex and more sex led him incessantly to betray Nastassja’s mother and finally to abandon her and his daughter. But in one, unusually tender, passage, he claims Nastassja came to visit him and two of his other children, and that ‘she clings to me for help as if afraid. . . and her words come like shrieks from her choking throat: “You. . . don’t. . . love. . . me.”‘

“Complete invention,” says Nastassja. Really? “I haven’t read the book and I don’t want to. But I know. . . he would just invent stuff. That hasn’t happened.” But did she never see him again? “No, I wrote him a long letter, but I didn’t see him. I told him what I thought in the letter – a long letter.”

What she thought may have been bilious, but what she had hoped for was different: “I always thought, ‘Maybe later, maybe later he’ll come back,’ and later never came,”she has said. “When he died [of a massive heart attack, in November 1991], I had a moment of grief that lasted about five minutes. It was very intense, then never again. Because he caused us too much pain.” The aftermath of all this lends itself to the pattest of Freudian analyses: Nastassja, after all, was 27 years younger than Polanski when they met; 14 years younger than her husband when they married, in 1984; 28 years younger than Quincy Jones when she went off with him in 1992. At 39, does she still need father figures as directors, lovers, friends?

“Well, any kind of. . . well, directors, yes. That’s why I know so many doctors – I know more doctors and nurses than I can think. Any kind of person who has authority that gives the impression of care; you know, of caring that you exist. And of course any kid that doesn’t have a father looks for approval and elements of fatherhood in other people. But, no, I can’t say that people I’ve been with are like father figures.” (Her ex-husband, Ibrahim Moussa, would seem to disagree: “She never wanted to marry me,” he has said. “I was more of a father to her than a husband.”)

Directors in whom she wishes to put her filial trust include the 55-year-old Terrence Malick (she loves his Days of Heaven), the 63-year-old Warren Beatty, and the 82-year-old Swedish maestro Ingmar Bergman. She no longer wants to do films ‘just to survive’. She has, after all, worked with the best; but she has also done ‘other things that were not like that – and it’s very painful.’ (Terminal Velocity, a 1994 action flick, and Danielle Steel’s The Ring in 1996 should, perhaps, be uppermost in her mind.) Now she wants to be working with people who are ‘very challenging’, and to take on subjects that are very challenging: she would, she says with a self-deprecating smile, like to make documentaries about the Pope, Nelson Mandela and Leni Riefenstahl, Hitler’s favourite film director.

 

_______________________
15 of Nastassja Kinski’s 50 films

______________
Roman Polanski Tess (1979)
‘Roman Polanski adapted Thomas Hardy’s novel Tess of the D’Urbervilles and came up with this moody, haunting film starring Nastassia Kinski as the farm girl who is misused by the aristocrat for whom she works and who is then caught in a marriage where her initial happiness soon turns to grief. Fans of the novel may feel unpersuaded by Polanski’s effort to marry Hardy’s Dorset vision with his own fascination with psychosexual impulses toward survival, but the film is an often stunning thing to see, and Kinski’s sensitive, intelligent performance lingers in the memory.’ –Tom Keogh


Excerpt


Excerpt

 

____________________________
Francis Ford Coppola One from the Heart (1982)
One from the Heart is perhaps most famous for being one of the decade’s biggest box office bombs than for the film itself. Coppola went widely over-budget, haemorrhaging away money on the elaborate sets, and the film was a critical and commercial disaster. Coppola fails to grasp that all the best musicals have at least some kind of story anchor and genuine heart at the centre of the songs and style, and his incredible visual panache isn’t enough to rescue One From the Heart from eventual tedium. But it’s a beautiful-looking, intriguing failure, and every great director should be allowed a couple of those.’ — Future Films


Trailer


Excerpt

 

_________________
Paul Schrader Cat People (1982)
‘I didn’t agree with the way the film was done. Overall I didn’t like my performance in Cat People at all. I wanted to do the movie in a much rougher way, getting more into the souls and passions of these people. Who cares about blood and flesh smeared all over the place? I blame myself because I listened to the director. I should have rebelled. I followed his path. I sort of melted into what Schrader thought was right. I used to think you had to do what the director tells you to do, but you can’t. You have to put your own individuality into it, your own thoughts. I didn’t. I let myself be trapped. I don’t regret it, except that we didn’t go where we had to go…Schrader should have taken all that other shit out that wasn’t necessary and gone more deeply into the souls of the characters…he lied to me after all we’d been through. He knew exactly what he was doing.’ — Nastassja Kinski


Trailer


Excerpt

 

_______________
James Toback Exposed (1983)
‘It is very important to understand that Exposed, more that any other film she ever made, seems to be about Nastassja Kinski. The first hour of the film is a remarkable character study and portrait of a woman very much separated from her own identity, her own persona if you will. One person even says directly to Kinski at one point, “You have the mystery of Garbo, the wit of Lombard and eroticism of Monroe.” What is striking about this isn’t Toback’s mirroring of the critical reaction Kinski always received, but the near disgusted and exhausted look on her face hearing it. Only Nastassja Kinski knows just how close Exposed was to her own self, but I am willing to bet their are few portrayals she gave that were more personal and close to her.’ — Jeremy Richey


Trailer


Excerpt

 

_______________________________
Jean-Jacques Beineix The Moon in the Gutter (1983)
‘Playing the embodiment of an artists dream is a near impossible task, and I am not sure if anyone besides Nastassja Kinski could have played Loretta with so much dreamy dignity and calm. She delivers a surprisingly human performance in what probably could have been her coldest role. Kinski, who gives one of the decades most defining performances in The Moon in the Gutter, was hurt by the film’s brutal reception, but she would bounce back with four of her best performances before the ill fated Revolution would ground her career a few years later. Beineix would return with a vengeance a few years after The Moon in the Gutter with his fierce Betty Blue, but unfortunately his career has never fully recovered from the pounding that The Moon in the Gutter received.’ — Nick Adams


Excerpt

 

_______________________________
Tony Richardson The Hotel New Hampshire (1984)
The Hotel New Hampshire, a work centered on the very dysfunctional Berry family, features one of the greatest ensemble casts of the eighties. The core of the film belongs to a really wonderful Jodie Foster as the brilliant but troubled Frannie Berry, a handsome (and I think quite good) Rob Lowe as her brother John, and Beau Bridges as their ambitious dreamer of a father, Win. Also as part of the family are Paul McCrane, Lisa Banes, Jennifer Dundas and a young Seth Green. Throughout the film we meet a large variety of supporting players including most notably Wallace Shawn as a Mr. Freud and Nastassja Kinski as the paralyzingly insecure Susie The Bear.’ — Nostalgia Kinky


Trailer

 

__________________
Wim Wenders Paris, Texas (1984)
‘The film is perfectly cast, and while Stanton dominates the film, Dean Stockwell is also effective as the brother torn between love for his brother and fear that his return will mean that he and his wife may lose a child that they have raised as their own son. Hunter Carson is that rare thing – a good eight-year-old actor, while Nastassja Kinski is so beautiful that you truly believe that Travis could have been driven nuts with jealous desire. The ending is the probably the happiest possible outcome for these characters, and yet also desperately sad – it reminded me very much of the final moments of John Ford’s The Searchers. Paris, Texas is easily Wenders’ best film, and a masterpiece of loss and regret.’ — Spinning Image


Excerpt


Excerpt

 

_________________________
Andrey Konchalovskiy Maria’s Lovers (1984)
Maria’s Lovers is notable not only in that it marks Konchalovsky’s English language film debut but it also marks one of the first English language films ever to be shot by a Russian director. Maria’s Lovers would mark the end of an era for Nastassja as it would be her last English language film for almost a decade that would garner any real serious critical and popular acclaim. The film was also important in that would garner Nastassja one of the only major awards for her acting she ever received. It remains one of her finest performances and one of the best films she ever appeared in.’ — Gerard Brach


Trailer


Excerpt

 

_______________
Lina Wertmüller Crystal or Ash, Fire or Wind, as Long as It’s Love (1989)
‘An American journalist works for a French newspaper. He is writing an article about the reaction against people with AIDS, without knowing he is infected too. Once he finds out, he decides to cut off himself leaving his wife and daughter.’ — MUBI


Excerpts

 

_______________________
Wim Wenders Faraway, So Close! (1993)
‘Of the three films Nastassja Kinski made with Wim Wenders, Faraway, So Close! is the weakest and yet there is something profound and right about it. Faraway, So Close! is a overtly spiritual work that has moments that rank along with the best of Wenders, but it’s hard to deny that the film falters in ways that Wenders work hadn’t before it. Gone is the moody perfection that inhabited so much of his early career, and in its place in Faraway, So Close! is a sprawling over-ambitiousness that is as beautiful as it is frustrating and as poignant as it is flawed. It’s a film that finds the great German director transitioning from one of the shining lights of the art house world into one of the most fractured.’ — Nostalgia Kinky


Trailer


Excerpt

 

_____________________
Antonio Tibaldi Little Boy Blue (1997)
Little Boy Blue is a difficult-to-review dichotomy of a movie. It continually pairs brilliant film-making with portions that one would expect from a straight-to-video release. The movie starts off quickly establishing its heavy sexual content and unusual family relationships. The alcoholic, Vietnam veteran father played by John Savage is a fierce, detestable character meant to be feared by all but his inexplicably devoted wife played by Nastassja Kinski (what does she see in him?). Savage’s character is effective but could have given us more understanding of why he became who he is. Savage spares no family member his brutality and cruelty. Oldest son Jimmy (Ryan Phillippe) receives even more denigration than his two younger brothers. The tension as Savage and Phillippe both realize that Jimmy’s now reaching the age where he may be able to stand up to Savage and therefore threaten his dominance over the family is brilliantly played.’ — IMDb


Excerpt


Excerpt

 

____________________
Mike Figgis One Night Stand (1997)
‘The film is narrated by Max Carlyle (Wesley Snipes). Max lives in California, where he has a successful career directing television commercials and is happily married to Mimi (Ming-Na Wen), with whom he has two children. While visiting New York City, Max meets Karen (Nastassja Kinski) by chance after missing a flight; circumstances keep bringing them together over the course of the evening, and they end up spending the night together. The film is directed by British director Mike Figgis. The first draft of the screenplay was written by Joe Eszterhas, who had his name removed from the project following Figgis’ rewrite.’ — Box Office Mojo


Trailer

 

_____________________________
Neil LaBute Your Friends and Neighbors (1998)
‘Neil LaBute’s Your Friends & Neighbors is quite possibly the meanest film I have ever seen. These characters are some of, if not, the worst I have ever come across. What makes them worse than, say Hannibal Lecter, is how they stealthily move behind each others backs to wound each other in the worst and most emotionally damaging ways. You should not be treading lightly when you sit down to view this picture. It’s a nasty piece of work.’ — Steven Carrier


Trailer


Excerpt

 

__________________
Aruna Villiers À ton image (2004)
‘In order to put a painful past and a terrible sense of guilt behind her, a sterile young woman named Mathilde (played by Nastassja Kinski) uses extreme cloning methods to give birth to Manon (Audrey DeWilder), and is comforted by her obstetrician husband Thomas (Christopher Lambert). The child’s growth is abnormally rapid and she becomes the splitting image of her mother. Gradually, the relation between them evolves in an odd manner as Manon takes over her mother’s role in the family.’ — Wikipedia


Trailer


The making of …

 

___________________
David Lynch Inland Empire (2006)
‘Nowadays, Nastassja Kinski is rarely seen on the screen and it is not a matter of being not in demand. With age, the actress learned how to choose roles. After the disastrous comedies Fathers’ Day and Town and Country, the actress refused to star in mainstream films concentrating on low-budget, art-house and television cinema. Her last on-screen appearance was an episode in Inland Empire by David Lynch in 2006. When asked about Inland Empire, Lynch has responded that it is “about a woman in trouble, and it’s a mystery, and that’s all I want to say about it.” When presenting screenings of the digital work, Lynch sometimes offers a clue in the form of a quotation from the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad: “We are like the spider. We weave our life and then move along in it. We are like the dreamer who dreams and then lives in the dream. This is true for the entire universe.”‘ — All rovi


Trailer


Outtake

 

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** Keatonpalooza, Hi, man. LA was fun. The flight was tolerable, I suppose. Escorts are good at restoring the human soul. Maybe. I hope you’re feeling less sick. I’ll trade you my jet lag. Maybe. ** Misanthrope, Thanks, G. I can see you again barely thanks to my lag, but better than nothing. How’s stuff? ** h, Hi. Nope, I’m back in Paris. I’m good, just, predictably, sleepy. But hey. Good to see you! ** David Ehrenstein, Hi. That’s the band. I may have said this already, but I watched a Bresson film (‘4 Nights of a Dreamer’) right after we finished editing PGL, and I was very relieved that our film is actually not overly Bressonian apart from the performance strategy, but, yeah, Bresson echoes in everything I’ve ever done, so of course that’s more apparent in our film. Thank you so much! ** Bill, Hi, B! I know, right? The escorts’ guestbooks have more trolls than Rashida Tlaib of late. Glad the Zurn post hit home. My lag is … we’ll see. Inauspicious start. Flight movies: ‘McQueen’ (Interesting because I realised I hardly knew anything about Alexander McQueen). ‘Venom’ (shitty, watchable). ‘Deadpool 2’ (not my thing, okay-ish, I guess). ‘The Darkest Minds’ (meh low budget attempt to start a new ‘Hunger Games’-meets-‘Maze Runner’ franchise, I think). ‘Incredibles 2’ (fun, okay). I’m with you on the head and blood fountains, in my daydreams. I do know about Kenneth Atchley’s fountains, but I’ve never seen them or any evidence. Huh. ** kier, Hi, Kierolossal! The Bookworm thing was good, I think. Yeah, I’ll link you. Shouldn’t be too long. On Oslo, well, the good news is it’s happening for sure plus a reading by me. The bad news is that it has been delayed until October to coincide with a ‘Jerk’ performance there, so that kind of quite sucks. But at least it’s locked down. I can’t sleep on flights, not a wink. I’m too tall, scrunched, so I watched movie after movie (see: above list) and waited and waited. But it’s over now. Oh, yeah, don’t get stressed about your essay. Stress is the ultimate enemy. I don’t know how to suggest de-stressing, though. It’ll be great, or, even if it ends up being something you don’t think is great, I’m sure it will serve its purpose, you know. Great to see you, buddy! More soon! ** _Black_Acrylic, Hi, Ben. Yes, I remember your essay on Zurn. I don’t know why it wasn’t linked in the post unless the post is older, which seems quite, quite possible. Everyone, If you haven’t yet had your fill of Unica Zurn, and how could you (?), the honorable Ben ‘_Black_Acrylic’ Robinson wrote a fine, fine piece on her back in 2012 called “FRIENDS FEAR FOR UNICA: The abridged life of Unica Zürn” that is must reading and exists here. Oh, awesome about the short story class’s return! ** James, Hi! My travels seem to have been safe, thank you. My favorite LA restaurant, Mexico City, closed down before I got home, and I had to look at its hollow shell a number of times, which was sad. But I did hit others: the godlike Poquito Mas, Massa (great Chicago-style deep dish pizza), Flore (great vegan), etc. I’ve never eaten at Mel’s, strangely enough. We have a billion things we have to do very quickly (stuff for the PGL French press release, stuff for the American PGL DVD, ARTE TV show meeting), but, after that, the first thing that will happen is finishing the new film script. I’m going on strike re: everything else I’m supposed to write or do until that’s nailed down because it’s been waiting to be finalised for over six months, and I’m hoping mad. How’s your novel and everything else going? ** Aaron Nielsen, Hi, Aaron! It was really nice to see you too, albeit too briefly, of course, Thank you about the film. And again for the Bret hookup. I think the show went well, fingers crossed. What are you up to and working on? ** Jeff J, Hi, Jeff. Thanks about the fountains. Yeah, the Ray is god. It’s quite possible you learned of ‘Compact’ here, and I’m very happy you’re reading it. Hm, you know, I don’t think I’ve read ‘Moravagine’, unless I’m spacing, which is possible given my jet lagged head at the moment. Huh. I’ll find out. If not, I definitely will very soon. Thanks! Sure, let’s chat. Just give me a few days to get my sleeping patterns realigned so I’ll be good company. But later this week? ** Dominik, Hi, D! I’m good other than the, yeah, lag. It’s always hard to rate my jet lag on the first day. It usually takes three days to know if it’ll be murderous or not. Today it’s about an 8, I would say. Unfortunately I need to jump back into work starting tomorrow. But that can be good to force my brain back into place, maybe. Yeah, let your tooth sit and see if it bothers you. Mine don’t bug me at all. But I might be lucky? Fantastic news about the SCAB coming together! I’m already twiddling my thumbs excitedly! You have a great week too! And I look forward to mutual speaking with a better brain. ** Steve Erickson, Hi. Me too, about the next days, thank you. And thank you too so much for the email and your kind help. I’ve passed the info along to the powers-that-be, and we’ll see. Ha ha, wow, weird to imagine that Cars remix. Is it easily hearable? ** Quinn Roberts, Hi, Quinn. How nice to see you again! I’m good, just back from traveling and showing the film, but quite jet lagged as an immediate result. I’m sorry to hear Berlin didn’t work out. Where are you now? Yes, I’d still love to coffee, and hopefully we can find a way. Well, on the MFA question, first, my aforementioned jet lag is an issue re: my thinking, and, second, I never went for an MFA myself. I quit university after one year and just developed my writing on my own by writing, reading, and sharing work with other writers I trusted. I think an MFA program can be very helpful at least in terms of meeting peers, the regular attention to your work, the forced discipline, etc. But, based on any experience and that some other writers I know, it’s certainly not a make or break thing, and I wouldn’t take the rejections, if you get them, as any kind of meaningful judgement on your work at all. What they’re looking for is not necessarily evidence of real talent or originality per say. They all have agendas and quotas and things. I’m a bit of a workaholic, so I never had any problem devoting myself to my writing. And, should you not end up going the MFA route, finding writer peers, either in the real world or online, can be totally sufficient. I’m happy to offer any more encouragement and advice that would be helpful, so don’t fear asking. Take care, and hopefully we’ll talk again soon. ** Nik, Hi, Nik! The US trip was great. The screenings went really well, and being out West was a pleasure. That’s totally fascinating about your ‘recreation’ of ‘RiaGE’. Wow. That’s very interesting. That’s very cool, and such a good idea. Well, on the imitation thing, this may not be in the area you’re asking about, but for my novel ‘Closer’, I wanted to find/develop a series of voices for the different chapters that had a strong resemblance but with variations. And what I did to find them was I selected a number of texts of different kinds that I liked, from SE Hinton to Baudelaire to … I forget. Then I did a kind of cut-up of the texts, not in the programmatic, slice and dice way of Burroughs, but kind of intuitively, and then I revised and edited those texts using my own voice of the time, and it worked to create a series of voices that were mine and yet different and a bit far afield of mine, if that makes any sense. So that was a kind of learning by imitation, I think. I don’t think doing imitations as Ann suggested is a bad idea at all. I think it’s easy to worry about being overly influenced by other writers’ work, but, in my experience, it’s actually very rare that the writer’s own sense of voice and literary/real interests don’t overwhelm the ‘imitation’ and make that aspect moot. So, yes, I think doing that can be a totally legit and helpful way to learn new skills and tricks as a writer. You gonna try it? ** Okay. We are caught up. Why don’t you spend your local time today dwelling in my select filmography of Nastassja Kinski? See you tomorrow.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 DC's

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑