The blog of author Dennis Cooper

Category: Uncategorized (Page 213 of 1086)

José Val del Omar Day *

* (restored)

 

‘All over the Spanish-speaking world however, much experimental film has been made, generating on both sides of the Atlantic a surrealist-inflected historical avant-garde, ‘60s formal innovation in the interest of political militancy, a Super 8 underground of the ‘70s, and the contemporary proliferation of work enabled by video technologies. Several DVD collections of experimental film have recently been released by the Barcelona-based Cameo Media, a distributor that specializes in independent and experimental film. Unquestionably the most invaluable of these, the five-disc Val del Omar: Elemental de España, is dedicated to the works of the unique solitary inventor-artist José Val del Omar, the most notable of which is the formidable Tríptico elemental de España (Elementary Triptych of Spain, shot between 1953 and the mid-‘60s), without a doubt the most ambitious project in Spanish cinema history and one referred to by Amos Vogel in Film as a Subversive Art as “an explosive, cruel work of the deepest passion…nameless terror and anxiety…one of the great unknown works of world cinema.”

‘The Tríptico is a series of three “elementales,” (the name would translate as “elementary”), which Val del Omar proposed as a cinematic genre distinct from the documentary: Aguaespejo granadino (Water-Mirror of Granada, 1955) Fuego en Castilla (Fire in Castile, 1960), and Acariño galáico (Galician Caress, begun in 1961 and completed posthumously in 1995 from Val del Omar’s footage, recordings, and notes). Parts of the Tríptico won awards at the Cannes, Bilbao, and Melbourne film festivals in the late ‘50s and early ‘60s before disappearing from view for decades, noticed only by such diligent UFO-spotters as Vogel. Since the 1980s the films have occasionally been screened theatrically, most notably opening a 1982 retrospective of Spanish experimental film at the Centre Pompidou and inaugurating the Filmoteca de Andalucía in 1989, which has since recovered and restored several of Val del Omar’s earlier documentaries.

‘Val del Omar’s cultural formation took place in the intellectual ferment of the Granada-based avant-garde of the ‘20s. He was a neighbour of the composer Manuel de Falla and a friend of Federico García Lorca, both central figures of Spain’s modernist cultural flowering. During the years of the Spanish Republic, he worked with the misiones pedagógicas (teaching missions), a state-run program that brought modern culture and learning to rural populations still dominated by large landowners and the Church, challenging the latter’s monopoly on truth. The misiones’ project included the use of cinema as a pedagogical instrument, but Val del Omar—a utopian modernist with a pronounced spiritual bent—saw the relatively young medium as a way to foster a collective identity among its viewers, overcoming the principle of individuation that both confined human beings to a brief and tragic temporal existence and hindered social progress.

‘Val del Omar filmed more than 40 silent documentaries and took hundreds of still photos, many of which show peasant faces entranced by the novelty of the cinema. This power of the medium later motivated many of Val del Omar’s inventions and the dream of the grand project he called meca-mística (mechanical mysticism), in which the cinema would serve as a “magic instrument, amplifier of our vision,” making palpable—thanks to its indexicality, the traces of the material brought to the screen by light—what he called the “mystery” or “substance”: that immutable, impalpable omnipresence of elementary matter that makes up the cyclical rhythms of the universe, and that has been displaced by temporal, especially modern, concerns.

‘However, instead of a programmatic rejection of the modern à la the Spanish right, Val del Omar spent much of his life developing a cinematic technology that would facilitate ecstatic transport beyond the limitations of the body’s sensorium. Herein lies the paradox: a humanist—called by fellow restless filmmaker Luis García Berlanga “one of the last survivors of that proud caste of the enlightened that has done so much to dignify scientific and humanistic progress in Spain”—who strove to advance progress not through reason but through a mystic idealism. Val del Omar’s notion of progress is not an advance from the ideal to the material, nor from faith to reason, but is instead an inspired combination of the old plaint of the fall into temporality and the modernist conception of bourgeois individualism as a post-lapsarian condition. Val del Omar’s mysticism addresses both, by seeking to unite man with the divine in nature and with the rest of humanity through the cinema.

‘After the Civil War, Val del Omar’s dreaming found little room in the autarchic Spanish cultural field of the ‘40s and ’50s. Congenitally suspicious of cultural marginality, the Franco regime fomented a monocultural commercial cinema as a natural outgrowth of its militaristic National-Catholic project, vesting all authority in the major national studios and leaving little space for avant-garde experimentation. Unable to film independently, Val del Omar turned to technological experimentation with lenses, sound, and lighting and projection technology as a part of his mystical project, designed to thrust the Tríptico’s viewer into ecstatic transport by eliminating the distance between spectator and spectacle.

‘While working in special effects at the Estudios Chamartín (one of the four major film studios at the time) and on radio programs during the early ‘40s, Val del Omar filed several patents for inventions in audio technology, one of which, the Diáfono sound system, was his first technological step toward the total spectacle of the Tríptico, placing sources both in front of and behind the spectator, each on a separate track, to produce what he called a “dialectical dialogue” of sound. Diaphony was not meant to enhance sonic verisimilitude like the stereophony it predated, but to enhance the power of the cinematic apparatus beyond the mere faithful representation of reality. By 1956, when Aguaespejo granadino played at the Berlinale, Val del Omar had also perfected what he called Desbordamiento Apanorámico de la Imagen (Apanoramic Overflow of the Image), in which a simultaneous projection of abstract images, synchronized with the rhythms of the film’s sound, could be seen on the front and side walls and the ceiling of the theatre, creating in effect a concave screen that engulfed the spectator. He then developed Visión Táctil (Tactile Vision), a system of pulsating light intended to “tactilize” visual perception, which he used for the second part of the Tríptico, Fuego en Castilla. These inventions were designed to release his films from confinement within the edges of the flat screen, a move from the optic toward the haptic and an expansion of perceptive possibilities beyond those normally available to the sensorium, both in the cinema and outside. In the Tríptico, the elemental movement of water, clouds, and light in rhythms normally invisible to the naked eye is made perceptible through Val del Omar’s many inventions, in combination with freeze frames, fast and slow motion, filters, and anamorphic mirrors. The resulting experiences range from solemn to ecstatic, from torment to illumination.

‘The settings of the Tríptico—Galicia, Castile, Granada—trace an arc across the Iberian Peninsula, while the corresponding elements of earth, fire, and water point to a pre-modern epistemology, restoring the Islamic and Jewish others long suppressed by those traditionalists (now restored to power by the Nationalist regime) who promulgated nostalgic imaginings of a homogeneous Catholic national origin. Drawing freely on the writings of the 16th-century mystic San Juan de la Cruz—whose poems and commentaries describe a spiritual journey from a fallen temporal condition, advancing, cycling back, and eventually progressing through “purgation” to the “illuminative” stage—Val del Omar sought to reconcile this older mysticism with the avant-garde project of shocking the spectator out of an anaesthetized modern condition, in the process implicitly scorning the Franco regime’s militaristic mediocrity. Following the sequence of San Juan’s interior journey, the Tríptico was designed to be viewed in the reverse order of its making: from the post-lapsarian state of Acariño galáico, in which the spirit is trapped by the body’s attachment to the material, through the sufferings of the “dark night” of purgation’s painful release from the emotional attachment to the material (Fuego en Castilla), and closing with Aguaespejo granadino’s mystical union with the divine in nature.’ — Matt Losada, Cinemascope

 

_____
Stills




























































 

____
Further

José Val del Omar Website
JVDM @ IMDb
José Val del Omar’s Tríptico Elemental and Other Experiments from Spain
SÉANCE ART & CAMÉRA : JOSÉ VAL DEL OMAR
El genial naufragio de Val del Omar
José Val del Omar @ MUBI
JOSE VAL DEL OMAR COLLECTION
VAL DEL OMAR: ELEMENTAL DE ESPAÑA
José Val Del Omar @ cineastes
Dos o tres cosas que (ahora) sabemos de Val del Omar
Las Misiones Pedagógicas de José Val del Omar
José Val del Omar @ Criterion Forum
José Val del Omar, pionero del cine documental español
Val del Omar y las Misiones Pedagógicas
VAL DE OMAR ‘Desbordamiento de Val del Omar’
José Val del Omar: una pedagogía de la visión
Art Education, Visual Images, Technologies and Cultural Contexts from José Val del Omar (I)
José Val del Omar: “Tríptico elemental de España” (II)

 

____
Extras


la retrospectiva : desbordamiento de VAL DEL OMAR – En Proceso


Explicación Diafonía en “Ojalá Val del Omar”


Desbordamiento de Val del Omar, Virreina-Centre de la Image


VAL DEL OMAR & EL NIÑO DE ELCHE (NOOK, BCN, 22-11-2014)


Lagartija Nick x Val del Omar

 

__________
Óptica biónica energética ciclo-tactil
by José Val del Omar

 

Enunciado
Sin relación alguna con la utilización habitual de los objetivos anamórficos en cinematografía (con finalidades concretas de cambio de formato entre el área del fotograma impreso en la cinta y el área de la pantalla donde se reproduce) la óptica cilíndrica, con su distorsión astigmática fundamental en permanente giro lento de su eje anamórfico, permite obtener un efecto de anticipación original, de verdadera trascendencia histórica en nuestra cultura.

Statement
Without any relation to the usual use of anamorphic lenses in cinematography (with specific purposes of changing format between the area of the frame printed on the tape and the area of the screen where it is reproduced), cylindrical optics, with its fundamental astigmatic distortion in permanent slow rotation of its anamorphic axis, allows obtaining an effect of original anticipation, of true historical significance in our culture.

Explicación
Nuestra civilización canaliza y transfiere por dos dimensiones, imágenes que tienen tres. Este es el caso de los dibujos murales, de los lienzos pictóricos, de las estampas de los libros y de las pantallas del cine y de la televisión.
Ante estas representaciones distorsionadas, por la incidencia generalmente oblicua de nuestra mirada sobre el plano base en que las imágenes se presentan, el observador actual las ecualiza espontáneamente.
(El hombre actual, sumergido en el mundo de tales representaciones culturales, ejercita de forma permanente, espontánea e insensible, una cibernética psico-fisiológica de reconstrucción correcta de la perspectiva real).

Explanation
Our civilization channels and transfers through two dimensions, images that have three. This is the case of wall drawings, pictorial canvases, prints in books and cinema and television screens.
Faced with these distorted representations, due to the generally oblique incidence of our gaze on the base plane in which the images are presented, the current observer spontaneously equalizes them.
(Today’s man, immersed in the world of such cultural representations, permanently, spontaneously and insensitively exercises a psycho-physiological cybernetics of correct reconstruction of the real perspective).

Anticipación
A este hábito cibernético nosotros nos anticipamos por medio de un artificio óptico biónico, que permite ofrecer a la percepción visual del espectador, unas imágenes cuyo eje de distorsión astigmática gira en acuerdo con su deseo de contornear hasta adquirir, por reciclaje, consciencia palpable del mundo material representa do en las imágenes.
La presencia interferente de esta óptica energética (precisamente por la distorsión astigmática, en giro uniforme constante), nos permite gozar de un fenómeno extraordinario de pretensión tactil –(estéreo-biológica)– de nuestra mirada.

Anticipation
We anticipate this cybernetic habit through a bionic optical device, which allows us to offer the viewer’s visual perception images whose axis of astigmatic distortion rotates in accordance with their desire to contour until acquiring, through recycling, palpable awareness of the world. material represented in the images.
The interfering presence of this energetic optic (precisely due to the astigmatic distortion, in constant uniform rotation), allows us to enjoy an extraordinary phenomenon of tactile pretension – (stereo-biological) – of our gaze.

En resumen
Nos encontramos sumergidos en una cultura de representaciones visuales distorsionadas, y constantemente, haciéndonos cargo de ellas, ejercitamos el automatismo de una ecualización mental.
Por ello, al anticiparse nuestro mecanismo biónico a la espontánea cibernética del espectador, provocamos que éste, confundiendo movimiento mecánico óptico externo con su energética visual, se lo apropie, sufra el error, goce la ilusión de desplazarse alrededor de las imágenes; y el hecho de esta sucesión de distorsiones producidas por el giro constante de un eje astigmático le estimula a intuir la imagen central, correcta, fotogramétrica, virtual, no aparecida en la proyección.

Colegas participantes en el XII Congreso UNIATEC que se celebra en una ciudad meridiano fronteriza oriente occidente:

tengo a honor ofrecer,
como libre representante de las investigaciones españolas sobre
Picto Lumínica Audio Tactil,
un descubrimiento que les invitará a una reflexión colectiva,
de trascendencia histórica en el parámetro de las transferencias visuales.

Nacido en una tierra vértice común de tres continentes, pues allí razonó Europa,
soñó África
y se impulsó el descubrimiento de América,
encendido por esta confluencia,
–hoy convertida en cuna de serenidades–,
soles y lunas volando sobre Granada,
me han permitido vislumbrar el siguiente fenómeno,
que muy bien había podido pasar a Ustedes inadvertido,
al estar todos nosotros sumergidos en culturas en las que permanentemente se ejercita,
igual que respiramos el aire.

Constantemente, transferimos a las dos dimensiones de una superficie más o menos plana,
–llámese mural, lienzo pictórico, página impresa de libro o periódico, o en pantallas de cine o de televisión–,
imágenes que requerirían no las dos, si no las tres y hasta las cuatro dimensiones.

Tan estrecha canalización de unidades informativas,
nos obliga, constantemente,
a la hora de ser comunicadas estas páginas o planos,
a que todo… espectador desarrolle un mecanismo humano psico-fisiológico, una cibernética de ecualización y restitución.

Tratando de fijarles, claramente, esta idea,
observen … que el eje de visión ideal de la pantalla de un cine,
se encuentra en la cabina de proyección,
pero el público siempre está en un lugar de la sala,
donde, si hiciéramos desde aquel sitio una fotografía de la pantalla, quedaríamos perplejos al comprobar la brutal distorsión que absorbemos, y sin darnos cuenta, anulamos.

Igual ocurre con la convexa pantalla del televisor,
con las curvadas páginas de los libros,
con la percepción de las pinturas en los muros o colgadas en éstos, y con los techos planos o curvados sobre los ámbitos.

En general nuestra mirada no suele caer con una incidencia perpendicular, si no oblicua y a veces muy oblicua,
sobre las superficies donde se nos ofrecen las imágenes;
y ello nos obliga al desarrollo de una cibernética de compensación,
que no percibimos por encontrarnos constantemente ejercitándola.

Gracias a la energía lumínica, complementada con la sensibilidad óptica, hemos realizado una extensión del tacto.
Es conveniente observar “que un ciego,
al querer darse cuenta de la forma de un objeto, extiende las manos hacia su superficie,
las desplaza casi en diagonal, rodeándolo, contorneándolo una y otra vez
hasta conseguir una imagen virtual satisfactoria”.

Esto escribí en una revista especializada de Madrid, hace 48 años.

Posteriormente, en la reunión mundial de expertos cine-TV convocada por UNESCO en 1955,
presenté mi “Teoría de la Visión Tactil”;
y más tarde, en 1961 obtuve en el festival de Cannes y gracias a la sensibilidad de Jean Vivié,
la “mención técnica”
por la práctica lumínica en mi filme Fuego en Castilla.

Discúlpenme, si les he marcado tres puntos del árbol genealógico que acredita el presente fruto, de una cultura experimental;
y al que considero superior decisivo.

En esta hora en que la Holografía, con su gran logro estéreo, nos despega, definitivamente, de la monoperspectiva,
he concebido un Artificio Biónico mediante el cual,
el creador de la comunicación visual picto-lumínica
se anticipa a los deseos del espectador,
tomando por base la inquietante y atractiva distorsión astigmática de las imágenes.

Originariamente, tal artificio, lo orienté
a marcar el mérito artístico de las imágenes
hasta ahora, culturalmente, transmitidas en dos dimensiones;
en particular las pictóricas y fotográficas;
aunque la ci[ne]mática del cine y de la televisión puedan utilizarlo, enriqueciendo, con toda seguridad, sus mensajes.

Tomando por base la distorsión de imágenes
–a la que ya estamos acostumbrados–,
nuestro artificio biónico también ofrece la proyección de imágenes en distorsión astigmática,
pero con la particularidad de presentarlas bajo el movimiento de giro lento y permanente de su eje astigmático.

Con este artificio biónico energético ciclo tactil,
la proyección –repito– con el movimiento de giro lento y permanente de su eje astigmático,
ofrece un efecto de gran atractivo y simpatía analógica
con los brazos y las manos del espectador palpando el contorno,
en repetido acto tactil, elemental y espontáneo.

El espectador, sumando esa distorsión,
en permanente desplazamiento concéntrico,
acumulando en su mente las consecutivas
posiciones del eje astigmático, poco a poco termina anulándolas;
y de tal reciclaje tactil, nace una nueva especie de “modulación cruzada”; en su imaginación una imagen virtual,
en la que se presiente la imagen real fundamental y escamoteada.

Señores Colegas: Es posible que más de uno de Vds. prefieran,
por estar más introducida,
la clásica actual imagen fotogramétrica congelada.
Yo me permito suplicarles, dada la evolución filosófica e instrumental de los “medios”,
una reflexión íntima y desapasionada.
Ya vivimos en un mundo que se siente sin pies ni suelo,
casi flotando en cero gravedad,
donde se anuló tiempo, espacio, perspectiva y secuencia, según los conceptos hasta ahora admitidos.
Se nos habla, no sólo de participación,
sino también de aprojimación del espectador.
La fórmula de mantener en giro lento un objetivo anamórfico, de tan elemental… pierde valor;
pero no olviden que uno de los grandes pasos del cinema, consistió en que, un buen día,
a un señor se le ocurrió levantar el trípode de la cámara
y acercarla a la cabeza de uno de los actores
de una escena que se fotografiaba en todo su conjunto.
De la espontánea estereografía
debida a nuestra visión binocular
y desde el desplazamiento personal cercando
atenazante el contorno del sujeto de nuestra visión,
hoy, al empleo de ópticas de ángulo variable
y al empleo más racional de los rayos luminosos, como dedos que palpan… podemos incorporar,
nacida de nuestro genérico impulso de posesión,
y para un nuevo gozo visual tactil,
esta nueva lírica óptica.

In summary
We find ourselves immersed in a culture of distorted visual representations, and constantly, taking charge of them, we exercise the automatism of mental equalization.
Therefore, by anticipating our bionic mechanism to the spectator’s spontaneous cybernetics, we cause him, confusing external mechanical optical movement with his visual energy, to appropriate it, suffer the error, enjoy the illusion of moving around the images; and the fact of this succession of distortions produced by the constant rotation of an astigmatic axis stimulates him to intuit the central, correct, photogrammetric, virtual image, not appearing in the projection.

Colleagues participating in the XII UNIATEC Congress held in a meridian city on the east-west border:

I have the honor to offer,
as free representative of Spanish investigations on
Picto Lighting Audio Tactile,
a discovery that will invite you to collective reflection,
of historical significance in the parameter of visual transfers.

Born in a land common vertex of three continents, because Europe reasoned there,
Africa dreamed and the discovery of America was promoted,
lit by this confluence,
–today converted into a cradle of serenities–,
suns and moons flying over Granada,
They have allowed me to glimpse the following phenomenon,
which very well could have passed unnoticed by you,
As we are all immersed in cultures in which we constantly exercise,
just like we breathe the air.

Constantly, we transfer to the two dimensions of a more or less flat surface,
–call it a mural, a pictorial canvas, a printed page of a book or newspaper, or on movie or television screens–, images that would require not two, but three and even four dimensions.

Such a narrow channeling of information units,
forces us, constantly,
When these pages or plans are communicated,
for every… spectator to develop a psycho-physiological human mechanism, a cybernetics of equalization and restitution.

Trying to fix this idea clearly,
Note… that the ideal viewing axis of a cinema screen,
is located in the projection booth,
but the audience is always in one place in the room,
where, if we took a photograph of the screen from that place, we would be perplexed to see the brutal distortion that we absorb, and without realizing it, cancel.

The same happens with the convex television screen,
with the curved pages of books,
with the perception of the paintings on the walls or hanging on them, and with the flat or curved ceilings over the areas.

In general, our gaze does not usually fall with a perpendicular incidence, but rather obliquely and sometimes very obliquely,
on the surfaces where the images are offered to us;
and this forces us to develop cybernetic compensation,
that we do not perceive because we find ourselves constantly exercising it.

Thanks to light energy, complemented by optical sensitivity, we have achieved an extension of touch.
It is convenient to observe “that a blind man,
wanting to realize the shape of an object, he extends his hands towards its surface,
He moves them almost diagonally, surrounding him, contouring him again and again.
until a satisfactory virtual image is achieved.”

I wrote this in a specialized magazine in Madrid, 48 years ago.

Later, at the world meeting of film-TV experts convened by UNESCO in 1955,
I presented my “Theory of Tactile Vision”; and later, in 1961 I obtained at the Cannes festival and thanks to the sensitivity of Jean Vivié, the “technical mention” for the lighting practice in my film Fuego en Castilla.

Excuse me, if I have marked three points of the family tree that accredits the present fruit, of an experimental culture; and whom I consider decisive superior.

At this time when Holography, with its great stereo achievement, definitively takes us away from monoperspective, I have conceived a Bionic Artifice through which, the creator of picto-luminous visual communication anticipates the viewer’s desires, based on the disturbing and attractive astigmatic distortion of the images.

Originally, such an artifice, I directed it
to mark the artistic merit of the images
until now, culturally, transmitted in two dimensions;
particularly the pictorial and photographic ones;
although the cinematics of cinema and television can use it, certainly enriching its messages.

Based on image distortion
–to which we are already accustomed–,
Our bionic device also offers the projection of images in astigmatic distortion,
but with the particularity of presenting them under the slow and permanent rotating movement of its astigmatic axis.

With this tactile cycle energy bionic artifice,
the projection – I repeat – with the slow and permanent turning movement of its astigmatic axis, offers an effect of great appeal and analog friendliness with the spectator’s arms and hands feeling the contour, in a repeated tactile, elemental and spontaneous act.

The viewer, adding this distortion, in permanent concentric displacement,
accumulating in his mind the consecutive positions of the astigmatic axis, little by little it ends up canceling them; and from such tactile recycling, a new species of “cross modulation” is born; in his imagination a virtual image, in which the fundamental and hidden real image is sensed.

Dear Colleagues: It is possible that more than one of you prefers,
because it is more introduced,
the current classic frozen photogrammetric image.
I allow myself to beg you, given the philosophical and instrumental evolution of the “media”,
an intimate and dispassionate reflection.
We already live in a world that feels without feet or ground,
almost floating in zero gravity,
where time, space, perspective and sequence were annulled, according to the concepts until now accepted.
We are told not only about participation,
but also the approach of the viewer.
The formula of keeping an anamorphic lens in slow rotation, so elementary… loses value;
but do not forget that one of the great steps of cinema was that, one fine day,
It occurred to a man to raise the camera tripod
and bring it closer to the head of one of the actors
of a scene that was photographed in its entirety.
From spontaneous stereography
due to our binocular vision
and from personal displacement surrounding
gripping the outline of the subject of our vision,
today, to the use of variable angle optics
and to the more rational use of light rays, like fingers that feel… we can incorporate,
born from our generic impulse to possess,
and for a new visual tactile joy,
this new optical lyric.

 

___________
10 of José Val del Omar’s 13 films

____________
Elementary Triptych of Spain (1982)
Elementary Triptych of Spain is the last film project by José Val del Omar (Granada, 1904 – Madrid, 1982). The idea arose in the last stages of his life and was aimed at creating a trilogy using his three ‘elemental pieces’: Aguaespejo granadino [Water-Mirror of Granada] (1955), Fuego en Castilla [Fire in Castille] (1960) and Acariño galaico [Galician Caress] (1961). The connecting link in the trilogy, which was filmed in different times and places, is spelled out in a prologue entitled Ojalá [If Only] (1980), which establishes the key points with which to read the whole. Beyond all motivation, a constant approach can be found in Val del Omar’s work: circling round, returning again and again to constant features. And this work must be seen as a whole, where technical trials, formal experimentation and the creative process merge. The Triptych, therefore, must be seen as one step more in the trajectory of an oeuvre that, while unfinished and open, always turns on itself and, at the same time, is a response to the prevailing audiovisual forms. Val del Omar worked on the conception of the Triptych from 1981 until his death in 1982, particularly on finishing Acariño galaico and preparing Ojalá. Throughout this process, he decisively influenced the presentation of his work by the curators of the Anthology of Avant-Garde Film in Spain, Manuel Palacio and Eugeni Bonet. Val del Omar was committed to presenting his Triptych with Acariño galaico and Ojalá, but in the end, he was not able to finish these works and only Aguaespejo granadino and Fuego en Castilla were screened. The Triptych, then, remains unfinished, but its three pieces, the unedited images and the loose notes conserved today make it possible to establish a unique relationship in Val del Omar’s work: beyond spectacle, in a dimension where the artistic experience creates its own conditions of appreciation, before it reaches the screen, but projecting its light onto our gaze. The time has come to our eyes.’ — Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía


Excerpt

 

_____________
Variations on a pomegranate (1975)
‘In the late 1970s Val del Omar set up a laboratory named PLAT (Picto – Luminic – Audio – Tactile) in Madrid, and continued experimenting with video and multimedia equipment. Variations On A Pomegranate is the only preserved piece from this period.’ — Experimental Cinema

Watch an excerpt here

 

_____________
Óptica Biónica (1974-1982)
Slide projector. Bionic optic. Truca (with chromatic adaptator and liquid adaptator).

 

_____________
Galician Caress (Of Clay) (1961, 1981-82, 1995)
‘This film was reconstructed and completed in 1995 by Javier Codesal for the Filmoteca de Andalucia, from the montage and the sound that Val del Omar had outlined before his death, after having returned to a project abandoned twenty years before with the incorporation of significant additions (above all in the soundtrack). Val del Omar’s notes show that, as he typically did, he had other alternative titles in mind, such as “Acariño de la Terra Meiga” (Caress of the Magic Land), “Acariño a nosa terra” (Caress of Our Land), or “Barro de ánimas” (Clay of Souls), and that in the final phase of the unfinished project he wanted to add a second sound channel – following the diaphonic principle, and using electro-acoustic techniques – consisting of ambient material that he intended to record at the first screenings of the film in the very places and to the very people that were its origin: its “clay”.’ — letterboxd.com


Excerpt

Watch the film here

 

______________
Fire in Castilla (Tactilvision from the Moor of the Fright) (1961)
Fuego en Castilla is the second of Val del Omar’s trilogy Tríptico elemental de España (‘Elemental Triptych of Spain’), a tactile visual poem begun in 1952 that brilliantly juxtaposes the modern and the folkloric, exploring myth, mysticism, religious imagery, fear, death, fire, rites and delirium. Each short film is set in a different region of Spain and focuses on an emblematic, essential element: water, fire and mud, for Granada, Castile and Galicia respectively. Fuego en Castilla starts with a line written by Lorca about the rituals of Holy Week: “In Spain, every spring Death comes and lifts the curtains.” After the explosion of light and sound in Granada in the first part, the film plays with chiaroscuro, shadow and light, creating movement using the pulsating light technique to bring to life the religious sculptures of Holy Week kept in the museum in Valladolid. Effectively, the symbiosis of human and sculpture will occur in Galicia, where water (Granada) and fire (Castile) will turn the human into a clay figure – a purification by fire.’ — bfi


the entire film

 

___________
Aguaespejo granadino (1955)
‘This video is based on an excerpt from Aguaespejo Granadino (1953-55) by José Val del Omar. The soundtrack on this video is a musical adaptation composed -as tribute to Val del Omar- by Joaquín Medina Villena for clarinet and electronic, with exclusive authorization from “Archivo Val del Omar”.’ — Joaquín MEDINA VILLENA


Excerpt


the entire film

 

___________
Película Familiar (1938)
Película Familiar is a family album in motion. It shows the director’s fondness for portraiture, here contrasted with his fascination with certain energetic or honest facial expressions. As a final kiss – Barthes’ punctum – intimate and indescribable.’ — MUBI

the entire film

 

____________
Vibración De Granada (1935)
‘This is a short film that, although a documentary in appearance, has very little to do with the generic conventions of that form. It would seem, then, that what we have here is the embryo of what he was subsequently to call the ’’elementary’’: an abstract or lyrical modality…’ — MUBI


Excerpt


Excerpt

 

_____________
Fiestas Cristianas/Fiestas Profanas (1934)
‘Silent documentary-film about Easter and Spring Festival in the region of Murcia (Spain) in the period between 1930 and 1935 during the 2nd Spanish Republic.’ — Cuneta


Excerpt


the entire film

 

_____________
Estampas 1932 (1932)
Scenes 1932 is a collective piece that reflects the work of those Pedagogical Missions from the II Spanish Republic that for many years took culture (not out of a didactic will but more of a recreational one) to the most forgotten corners of Spain. It is undoubtedly a vital experience that became crucial for the work and thinking of Val del Omar, who took part in them.’ — BAFICI


the entire film

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** David Ehrenstein, Yes, very sad about Davies. But great about your piece on him. I look forward to reading it. Everyone, maestro David Ehrenstein wrote a piece on the sadly recently departed filmmaker Terence Davies a few years ago entitled ‘A Director’s Struggle With Art and His Beginnings’ that’s no doubt extremely interesting. You can read it here. ** _Black_Acrylic, Oh, I don’t think you missed the point at all. I must admit I’m somewhat curious about that Savile biopic so I’ll see if it shows up in some accessible (to me) place. Mums know best, right, ha ha? ** Valno B., Hi, Valno. I don’t have a VHS of Shozin Fukui’s METAL DAYS, but, if I did, I would certainly at least rip it for you. ** T, Hi. Yeah, the week is going to be eaten by a work marathon, I can tell. Collectif du Jeune Cinéma starts this week? Yikes. I’d love to, but let me see how the work or rather the work schedule goes. At the moment we’re working into the evenings. But, yeah, I’ve been looking forward to hitting up the festival. With you would be ultra. Otherwise, ASAP, def. ** Bill, Yes, sad business about death swallowing TD. Glad you liked the array. I think I did have ‘Round Table’ on here before in some thematic context or other, yes. Excited to hear/think about that gears-using project, and I highly hope you sort it or sort a workmate. Pray tell. Yay for the blog’s timeliness. May it stand. I don’t think I had the Susan Taubes book here. It doesn’t sound familiar. I’ll look into it. Thank you! ** Mark, Hey! Awesome about the ToF festival. I’ll check around for pix or vid or something. And about Printed Matter + the zine. Everyone, Should you be interesting in scoring a copy of Mark’s (and Jose’s) amazing zine about moi — ‘For the Love of Dennis Cooper’ — you can do so via Printed Matter aka here. Infinite thanks, you guys. ** Cody Goodnight, Hi, Cody. I’m fine. So sorry about the insomnia. It’s the worst, the almost absolute worst. Based on your playlist, your brain is functioning in a highly proper manner at least. I’m in film editing mode, so that’s all I have to report on my end. Big day, better night! ** Right. The Museum of the Moving Image in NYC recently held a retrospective of José Val del Omar’s amazing and often difficult to access works, which seems to have inspired me to restore my old day about him. And I hope it will suit whatever you have planned or maybe not planned for today. See you tomorrow.

Mechanisms

________________
‘The Turkish artist Server Demirtas has been making mechanical, robotic sculptures since the late 1990s, which he himself calls ‘mechanical fictions’. Within his work and the subjects he addresses, he often chooses to reconstruct certain repetitive actions, such as a woman looking up from a deep thought, or the postures of a sleeping child. He is interested in the emotions that these movements can evoke in the viewer. In Koro/Choir, the artist clearly chose sexually tinted actions.’ — Mad Gallery


Twins, 2019


Scramble, 2019


Koro/Choir, 2015

 

________________
Inside a white-cube gallery space (with twenty-foot ceilings), visitors find themselves immediately confronted with Michael Sailsltorfer‘s Clearing at Proyectos Monclova in Mexico City, three larger than life, upside-down trees, slowly and methodically twirling in different directions propelled by giant metal mechanical arms, like dystopian jewelry box ballerinas in an unfolding horror film of climate crisis.

 

________________
‘I stumble upon a distraught woman hunched over on the floor, her face buried deep in her hands and pink flip-flops cast aside. Her feet are worn and ragged; her clammy skin is so pale the veins peek through and is ice cold to the touch. She seizes up at my contact and the crying comes louder now, mimicking the effect of real human vulnerability. It’s only when she lifts her head I realize she’s a robot—and even then, it takes more than a few seconds to fully register: a slow realization that sends me through an emotional cyclone of empathy, sadness and fear. She is Annelies, Looking for Completion by Dutch artists (and twins) Liesbeth and Angelique Raeven, alias L.A. Raeven.’ — elephant.art

 

________________
Can’t Help Myself, by artists Sun Yuan and Peng Yu is a giant industrial robot. The neck-like machine whips around viciously and spews a reddish-brown liquid towards viewers then laboriously cleans up the mess.

 

_______________
Rectangular Rotation by interdisciplinary researcher and artist Christian Faubel is an audiovisual performance based on a modified overhead projector, the ZoOHPraxiscope. Analog robotics are used to control motors and generate movement and sound. These movements are projected and create an animated shadow play that is always in sync with the sound. In addition the projector light can be switch at hight rates, to create flickering light and cinematographic animation of rotating picture discs.

 

________________
Stelarc’s Exoskeleton (1999). A six-legged, pneumatically powered walking machine has been constructed for the body. The locomotor, with either ripple or tripod gait, moves fowards, backwards, sideways and turns on the spot. It can also squat and lift by splaying or contracting its legs. The body is positioned on a turn-table, enabling it to rotate about its axis. It has an exoskeleton on its upper body and arms. The left arm is an extended arm with pneumatic manipulator having 11 degrees-of- freedom. It is human-like in form but with additional functions. The fingers open and close , becoming multiple grippers. There is individual flexion of the fingers, with thumb and wrist rotation. The body actuates the walking machine by moving its arms. Different gestures make different motions- a translation of limb to leg motions. The body’s arms guide the choreography of the locomotor’s movements and thus compose the cacophony of pneumatic and mechanical and sensor modulated sounds….

 

________________
Chrysalis by Chico MacMurtrie is a site specific, ever-changing, interactive inflatable architectural robotic environment. This live structure was composed to respond to and inhabit the great hall of MOCA Tucson, Arizona, in 2013. It is composed of 100 inter-connecting servo controlled fabric tubes, approximating both the qualities of muscles and the structural function of bones. 16 live networks can be selectively animated by the viewers’ motion, capable of opening up the structure, creating portals and inviting the viewer inside in order to sculpt the ever changing architecture.

‘Like the biological specimen, Growing Raining Tree responds to elements in its environment and is sensitive to movement around its perimeter. As you approach the pool surrounding the Tree, its limbs slowly come to greet you. Once they reach your location, the branches pull back and begin to drip rhythmically in response to your presence. When the Tree has no visitors, it takes a willow-like resting posture.’ — Amorphic Robot Works


Growing Rain Tree


Chrysalis

 

________________
Donato Piccolo Sebastiano (Il nottambulo) (2014)
platinum latex, oil, aluminium, electric system, motors, electronics

 

________________
In Ryuya Matsui’s exhibition Flower Robotics a large group of dangling robots dance frenetically on a strobe lit dance floor. Each robot’s character is determined by analyzing an inputted voice. As a result of the analysis, those robots have sex (pitch), characters (change in volume), and conditions (change in rhythm). Those robots also affect each others’ dancing styles, creating patterns of light and sound.

 

________________
‘An art-making robot was detained on her way to show at the pyramids because Egyptian customs officials thought she was a spy. Border agents kept the robot artist Ai-Da in custody for 10 days and debated removing her eyes, which have built-in cameras. “The British ambassador has been working through the night to get Ai-Da released, but we’re right up to the wire now,” said Aidan Meller, an Oxford art dealer who is both Ai-Da’s creator and representative. “It’s really stressful.”’ — Artnet

 

________________
Rafael Lozano-hemmer‘s Wavefunction is a kinetic sculpture comprised of fifty Charles and Ray Eames moulded chairs (designed in 1948) and placed in ten rows of five chairs each, facing the entrance to the exhibition space. When someone approaches the work, a computerized surveillance system detects their presence and the closest chairs automatically begin to lift off the ground, creating the crest of a wave that then spreads over the whole room. A system of electromechanical pistons raises each chair forty centimetres from the ground. The pistons are controlled by a computer that runs the mathematics of fluid dynamics, thus making the waves interfere with each other, creating turbulence or becoming calm, just like real water.

 

________________
‘Swiss/French artist Guillaume Reymond presents a new project Transformers. This series of performances brings together different types of vehicles, gathering them according to a precise choreography, and creating what looks from the sky like gigantic robots.’ — presurfer

 

________________
In a scene reminiscent of a life drawing class, Patrick Tresset’s 5 Robots Named Paul await the human sitter. When the subject arrives he is invited to sit in an armchair, an assistant pins sheets of paper onto the robots and wakes each one up. Immediately the robots look at the sitter and start to draw, their gazes alternating between the drawing in progress and the posing human. As the model in a life drawing class, the sitter is an object of study. Immobile, yet active in keeping the pose, the human is there to inspire the machines. For the audience he is only one of the 6 silent actors of a short theatrical event. The sounds produced by the robot’s motors create an improvised soundtrack. The robots, stylised minimal obsessive artists, are only capable of drawing. Each look alike except for their eyes, either obsolete digital cameras, or webcams. Their bodies are old school desks on which the drawing paper is pinned. Their left arms, bolted on the desks and holding black biros, are only able to draw. Paul’s behaviours are based on research into the cognitive, perceptual and motor processes involved when artists draw from life, and also by the author’s drawing practice.

 

____________________
Arcangelo Sassolino Figurante (2010). Steel, bone, hydraulic system, 29 ½ x 26 3/8 x 9 1/16 inches (head)

 

____________________
In ‘colmena’ by Pascal Glissmann and Martina Höfflin, a swarm of one hundred creatures settles in the trees of the Mediterranean park upon the hills of Palma where Joan Miró used to live and find his inspiration. At the break of dawn the silent population becomes a vivid collective that assimilates sunlight into organic and chaotic sounds and movements. The hanging creatures have a solid skin made of hand-crotched isolated wire to protect their simple analogue electronic organs. These are connected to tentacles that wind up the trees to collect as much sunlight as possible. Fed by light each corpus releases a repetitive monotonous movement accompanied by a a rather technical sound. Gathered as a swarm the individual output is merged into an organic soundscape and a united motion that feels natural and merges with the environment.

 

__________________
In Wade Marynowsky’s The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie Robot (2008), the scene is this: both side walls of the gallery are lined with gramophone horns that hiss gentle static; a robot spins around the floorboards at the arrival of each new guest. Human height, its mechanism is hidden by a lace-trimmed black bustle; a single (also lace-trimmed) video camera eye beneath a plastic dome is all that ties this machine to the 21st century. At a glance it resembles the autonomous robotics experiments of Mari Velonaki’s Fish-Bird, minus the Research Council support: the machine’s erratic trajectory and myopic focus speaks of the buggy algorithms of artificial intelligence on an arts grant budget, and the tinny, canned voice sounds the routine synthesised knell of another ‘new’ media interactive.

 

_________________
Mark Pauline’s Extremely Cruel Practices, featured the downtown L.A. 1985 performance of industrial-sized killer robots and occasionally fire-breathing monstrosities, all equipped with unique destructive capacities. That August 11, 1985, public performance — the full title was actually “Extremely Cruel Practices: A Series of Events Designed to Instruct Those interested in Policies That Correct or Punish” — featured incredible post-apocalyptic death machines built by Pauline and Matt Heckert, with assistance from Eric Werner, Neal Pauline and Monte Cazazza, not to mention a team divided into groups who specialized in computer and electronics work, props and mechanical operations.

 

__________________
Max Dean & Raffaello D’Andrea Robot Chair (2006): Raffaello D’Andrea, an associate professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering at Cornell University, has created a chair in conjunction with Canadian artist Max Dean that can crumple itself into a disjointed pile of wood and then reassemble itself.

 

___________________
‘The ORLANOÏDE is a sculpture that was created especially for the Artistes & Robots exhibition at the Grand Palais. The artificial hybrid has collected social intelligence that in turn generates texts and movements. The ORLANOÏDE that resembles ORLAN questions AI and new technologies which search to rebuild, reconstruct and reinvent the human body. In this installation the robot speaks, dances and sings with ORLAN’S voice and multiplies using mirrors to create a real visual spectacle and a theatre of deep learning. The ORLANOÏDE is in dialogue with ORLAN through the use of two HD screens and three cameras and a presence sensor. ORLAN asked many people to participate in the collective intelligence by imagining questions ORLAN might ask the ORLANOÏDE In the dialogue the social intelligence of social networks is also created and ORLAN invites the public to participate by responding to the Questions of Proust on the website: ORLAN.EU.’ — ASVOF

 

___________________
Bill Vorn, Emma Howes, and Jonathan Villeneuve’s Grace State Machines is a Robotic Art performance project. The name of the project is inspired by a virtual “state of grace” that could be expressed by automatons and other finite state machines. Through this project, we want to explore the close relationship between the real physical human body and machine body. We want to express the inner perceptions of both entities and how they intertwine, blend, mingle and become blurred as they interact and exchange in an intimate dialog between the organic and the artefact. The show is a twenty-seven minute stage performance involving solely a human performer and a machine. Both are linked via a high-end motion capture system and a set of biofeedback sensors and interfaces. By monitoring the human body movements and internal states and transposing this information to the robot body, we aim to establish a dynamic and symbiotic relationship between the actors. Both eventually blend into a single organism, where flesh, bones, wires and tubes become a whole individual body. The robotic machine is built as an abstract shape and is composed of actuated sections similar to flight simulator platforms and capable of producing very complex movements. The machine will sometimes react to the performer’s body movements, sometimes move on its own behavior and induce a response from the performer. We aim to induce empathy from the viewers towards a character which is nothing more than an articulated metal structure. The strength of the simulacra is emphasized by opposing the personalities of the performer and the machine, by subverting the normal perspective of human communication.

 

___________________
‘Korean artist Choe U-Ram‘s Round Table is made up of a gigantic round table supported by 18 headless straw statues. Sculpture moves so table tilt constantly changes, preventing the ball from falling out. Whenever the sphere is close to falling, the statues towards you stand up, changing the slope and forcing the sphere’s trajectory in the opposite direction.’

 

___________________
A Los Angeles based ‘Street’ artist who uses the name XVALA has stolen teen idol Justin Bieber’s wheeley bin and created a sculpture from it titled BieberBot. The work of art has been completed with a crate commandeered from the Facebook headquarters’ cafeteria and forms a singing life-like robot of the star. It will now make its debut at an upcoming gallery exhibition in Los Angeles.

 

___________________
Andro Wekua’s Some Pheasants in Singularity featured the life-size figure of a young woman. The blonde girl, sporting a short black mesh dress and silver tennis shoes floats, ghost-like, just above the floor. But she is no spirit, she is a cyborg; one of her arms is encased in a robotic prosthesis and the other, adorned only with a sweatband, thrums against her bare thigh. Her chin rests upon a rectangle of reflective glass suspended horizontally from the ceiling, which simultaneously recalls both a childhood swing and a hangman’s noose. The eerie pallor of her face, her almost peacefully closed lids and the rhythmic thrumming of her fingers against her bare legs would almost be erotic if it weren’t so distressing. Connected by black wires to the source of her movement, a conspicuous black box, she makes a hair-raising sight.

 

____________________
Muhannad Shono worked with Factum Arte, CALiper and the Beuth Hochschule für Technik in Berlin to create ‘On Losing Meaning‘: a robot encased in plasticine-like pigment designed to enact a performance with its own body.’ — Fact Arte

 

____________________
Perched on the edge of a stage at Prada Foundation wearing a transparent PVC jacket, sits Goshka Macuga’s bearded android. Created by A-Lab in Japan, he blinks, moves his hands, and turns his head as he rehearses a monologue pieced together from excerpts of history’s greatest orations. Surrounded by a cosmos of great art from around the world that suggests a history museum rather than a contemporary institution, he is a repository of human speech for a post-human world. Like Wolfson’s installations, Macuga’s man-made man is both alluring and repellent, for though he may spout the wisdom of ages, he suggests a somewhat dystopic future where this wisdom is manipulated into demagoguery bereft of meaning.

 

________________
For Rumba I: Incubator, Cao Fei combines an automated vacuum cleaner with synthetic chicks in a kinetic sculpture.’ — Parkett

 

________________
Accomplice is a large-scale robotic installation by Petra Gemeinboeck that embeds a group of autonomous robots into the walls of the gallery. The work presents an allegory of our world as a complex machinic ecology, nestling itself into our human environment and turning it into a playground for a colony of creative, social machines.’ — GTA

 

________________
‘San Francisco artist Alan Rath, internationally recognized for his pioneering exploration of electronics as an art form, died at age 60 on October 27, 2020 after battling a rare form of multiple sclerosis for many years. Beginning in 1985, Rath made sculptures with robotics and computer-generated video animations, which he designed, machined, and programmed himself. Formally elegant and meticulously crafted, yet playful and unpredictable, his leitmotif was the relationship between the mechanical/technological and the human body and behaviors.’ — Hosfelt Gallery


Forever


Wallflower II


Again


Moist

 

________________
Mika Rottenberg‘s Ponytail (Raven) & Ponytail (Gray) (2022)  consists of two fine ponytails — one blond and one raven coloured — that protrude through holes in the wall and vigorously bounce up and down.

 

________________
‘A robot terrier named AICCA is capable of analyzing and printing art critiques thanks to AI. It was created by artist Mario Klingemann, who wants to debate the use of AI in a provocative way. “AICCA, when it comes to an art space has the capability to recognise artworks so, when it has recognised a piece, it will take a closer look and analyse it. It´ll look for forms, shapes, abstract concepts. It tries to extract all these and turn them into a text prompt. When it defecated the text, the elements and symbols that it analysed appeared, 80% of them had a lot to do with the original concept.”‘ — AP

 

 

*

p.s. RIP Terence Davies. ** Armando, Hi, pal. Really nice to see you. Yes, still editing the film. We’re in a push right now to get the film ready for a deadline this Friday. It’s all good. Oh, yeah, ‘The Illiterate’. I’m happy you read it. It seems to have slipped through the cracks. She’s major, for sure. Great, man. How are you? What’s new? ** David Ehrenstein, Nice! Actual Dusty up close and personal time. Much missed: her. ** Misanthrope, Again, so sorry. That’s rough. I wasn’t big on the first ‘Avatar’ either, duh. And I guess I’ll sit through the second one a plane at some point. People are funny. ** Darbi 🦧, Hi, D! Thanks for the warning. I ducked just in time. Not that I couldn’t use some facial scratches. No, I really loved the sculpture. Word. Cross my heart and hope to die. Your roommate sounds wretched, but don’t let her overpower your good sense. Mountains are nice. As long as you’re not too high up and feel short of breath all the time. Yeah, ‘Martin’ is really good, or I think so. Maybe Romero’s best? You should watch it again, no? Is it at your fingertips? ** _Black_Acrylic, I think you’ll like ‘Blood Feast’. What’s not to like, really. I still need to read Chris Kelso’s book. For all kinds of reasons as well figuring why Burroughs and Scotland are/were a power couple. I have no clue. ** Audrey, Hi, Audrey! Thank you for entering. Thank you so, so much for saying that. That really means so much, and I’m grateful on behalf of my work. If you feel like it, come back and tell me anything you like about you and yours. It would be a pleasure. In any case, I send you love right back. Dennis. ** T, Hi. Uh, some of the locations were on the hill, yeah, but ‘Tim’s’ house was in the suburbs somewhere. We just yesterday got hit with a fast Friday deadline and will start editing the film this morning. I’ll know better by tomorrow how much time that’s going to take. This week might be rough though. Hope not. Let’s meet up as pronto as possible if so. I’ll give you the word. ** ANGUSWAVES, Hey, man! Great to see you! Wow, awesome about the Leckey exhibition! I just saw something about that yesterday on artnet or somewhere that I will now go back and read thoroughly. That sounds totally amazing on every front! And meeting and starting to get to know the ‘big deals’. Dude, that’s so fantastic! You sound really jazzed, and that’s wonderful to hear. I’ll go look at the Turner Contemporary website post-haste. Don’t lose your troublemaking side, yeah. Great, great. I wish I could get over there to see it before it closes. But I’m beset with work on our film right now, so I don’t know. Take care. Please keep me as informed as you find it interesting to do. xo. ** Corey Heiferman, Man, I’ve thinking about you the last few days, obviously. Holy shit. I’m glad you’re okay and still watching things on your roof. It sounds intensely scary. My imagination and willpower are attempting to construct a force field around you, my friend. ** Steve Erickson, Oh, other Vollman faves would be ‘Rising Up and Rising Down’, ‘The Ice Shirt’, ‘The Royal Family’, I guess, if I were to pick and choose. You a fan/reader of his? Everyone, For Gay City News, Steve has reviewed Pedro Almodovar’s short STRANGE WAY OF LIFE here. ** Yes, RIP Terence Davies. That was sad, unexpected news. His last short is online, wow. Everyone, Before we leave Steve for today, he tips us to the fact that the great and newly departed filmmaker Terence Davies’ final short film, ‘PASSING TIME’ is available to be viewed on youtube right here. I haven’t seen it, but I highly recommend it nonetheless. ** Cody Goodnight, Hi, Cody. Oh, no problem. I totally understand busyness. Honestly, I would say your two faves are mine as well. ‘Gore Gore Girls’ is pretty fun. ‘Peeping Tom’ is amazing. So influential too. Great you watched it. I’ve read the two big Shirley Jackson books. and some stories. Yeah, I’m a real admirer too. I hope your day and night drift/fly by lustrously. ** Right. I’m giving you a bunch of machines to ‘play with’ from a distance today. Check them out. See you tomorrow.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 DC's

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑