The blog of author Dennis Cooper

Category: Uncategorized (Page 210 of 1067)

5 books I read recently & loved: Ange Dargent The Others Lived As Me, Bert Meyers Bert Meyers: On the Life and Work of an American Master, Alice Notley Early Works, Doug Lang In the Works, Sara Nicholson April

_________________

DC: How old were you when you wrote your first poem, and what was it about?
Ange Dargent: I wrote my first poem when I was eight, during holidays, to impress mom. It was (already) a silly poem on death. Here is picture of it, it’s hard to read and full of spelling mistakes, but here is what I say: “Oh demonic force, why did you come here, I was born yesterday, and because of you, I will die tomorrow. Why, between thousands of houses, did you choose mine? Why? Why? Because your…”

DC: If you were to name poets who either especially influenced you and who you feel a special kinship with, who would they be and why?
AD: A lot of poets are important to me, and it’s hard to classify them. Like many French people, I discovered poetry with Rimbaud and for a long time he was my friend, my hero, the person I wanted to be. But to avoid a déjà vu feeling, I’ll talk of the others.
Those with the biggest influence on me would be: Paul Verlaine, Fernando Pessoa (as Alvaro de Campos), Anna Akhmatova. Pessoa for the themes he boards, Akhmatova for the mood she sets up, Verlaine for the way he speaks.
I think Verlaine reaches a perfect musicality. All his poems are not amazing but when they are, hell, he is the best. He expresses the deepest, saddest, and dirtiest thoughts with the prettiest words and the purity of a child. He plays around with sentences, repeat them, changed them slightly, and varies emotionally around them. Also, he is obsessed by his souvenirs, for all of this, I’d say he is the most influential on me.
Akhmatova, it’s more like a crush I didn’t expect, like this kind of person you kiss in a nightclub, that you’re supposed to forget right away, but strangely the day after, you keep a warm and close feeling of the person. Like if, during this kiss, you had understood something about yourself. I read her book “Requiem” when I was living in a maid’s room. I had no idea of who she was, I just went in a bookshop and there was a very good review written by one of the sellers. I was really impressed by the unity and mood continuity of it. She made me understand that book of poetry can have a narrative.
Pessoa was so important to me, not so much in his style, but I completely relate to his way of seeing the world. That his inner life doesn’t match the outside one, that everything is dreamlike, and that he doesn’t feel the principle of causality. ‘Tabacaria’ was for a long time my favorite poem.

DC: You’re an actor as well as a writer. Please describe how the reward you feel from writing and from acting are different or alike.
AD: I’d say that when I write, I get a creation reward feeling, to finally catch time and trap it somewhere, to go against death, and I get a reward of being able to work again on words and to only stop when it’s finally better.
When I act, I have the feeling to be more alive, but I have no idea of what is happening, it’s blurry, and, if I understand it, then it’s bad. As an actor I must turn my brain off. I mean what is nice about acting, it’s the experience of living the deepest moment of a character, and then, to pass to another thing, leave the character behind you. I think you fully experience life and get an idea of death when you are an actor. But I never felt like I was creating something by myself when I was acting. The reward feeling would be more to be part of something that might be beautiful, deep, and true.

DC: Is a poem a grave? If so, why, and if not, why not?
AD: In a way, yes, it is. I think a poem, is the expression of a sensation, and when I succeed to transcribe it, if I want to go visit the sensation and say hello to it, all I have to do is remember the words and to gather on them, like on a grave. But the sensation is not dead. The sensation still lives in me, just now, in a weird way, I understand it better and I’m allowed to forget it. Also, what is nice about grave, is that we can project all of what we want on it, the grave belongs to the visitor, and poems are the same. I think a poem is different for every reader. And people should be able to talk to the poem, with the poem, for the poem, like we do with a grave, we imagine over it, we cry over it, but honestly, it’s just a personnel thing, a grave, as a poem, is loaded by us.

DC: Describe the ceiling of the room you are sitting or standing in.
AD: Right now,
The ceiling is almost black.
It’s night and I should sleep.
During day this ceiling is white
If the sun goes on it,
It turns to golden
But I hope
That when you’ll read this,
I’ll be far away,
Of night,
Of day.
I hope
I’ll be moving,
And the ceiling
Will be sky
Or whatever.

Thinking about it, it might be a grave’s ceiling.

 

Ange Dargent @ Agences Artistique
Ange Dargent @ Instagram
Ange Dargent @ Facebook
AG @ IMDb
Buy ‘The Others Lived As Me’

 

Ange Dargent The Others Lived As Me
Kiddiepunk Press

‘A little book of sad poems about childhood, memory and loss. “The Others Lived as Me” is presented in a bilingual English-French edition.

‘Ange Dargent is a writer an actor. He has starred in numerous films including Michel Gondry’s ‘Microbe et Gasoil’, Michael Salerno’s ‘The Masturbator’s Heart’, and Dennis Cooper & Zac Farley’s ‘Room Temperature’ (forthcoming) — Kiddiepunk

68 pages, perfect-bound. Paperback.
Size: 12 x 18 cm

Excerpts

Extras


Bande démo Ange Dargent


Entretien avec… Ange Dargent

 

 

_____________

‘Bert Meyers was born Bertram Ivan Meyers in Los Angeles on March 20, 1928. The son of Romanian and Polish Jewish immigrants, he maintained strong lifelong ties to his Jewish cultural heritage without being religious. Always rebellious and a questioner of authority, he decided to drop out of high school and become a poet.

‘For many years he worked at manual labor jobs, including janitor, farmer worker, house painter, and printer’s apprentice, until he became a master picture framer and gilder. Here he finally found some satisfaction in the process of craftsmanship and attention to detail, the same approach he used in composing his poetry. Throughout these years he continued to write, feeling that a poet should be immersed in the world, not ensconced in academia, and should have real world things to write about. As he wrote in his journals “I worked for more than fifteen years at various kinds of manual labor and during that time I met many men and women who could see and speak as poetically as those who are glorified by the printing press and the universities.”

‘Meyers wanted to be self-taught. He read everything he could get his hands on and had a prodigious literary memory. He frequented the vibrant circles of LA poets at the time, with Thomas McGrath among others. Fiercely independent and nonconforming he strove to find his own path. In the words of his fellow poet and friend Robert Mezey, “Bert Meyers belonged to no school or coterie and had no use for fashion. He was that rarest of creatures, a pure lyric poet. His poems are very much what he was – gentle, cantankerous, reflective, passionate and wise.”

‘Although he had never taken undergraduate classes, and had no high school diploma, in 1964 he was admitted to the Claremont Graduate School on the basis of his poetic achievements. By 1967 he had completed a Masters degree and all the work necessary for a Ph.D in English Literature and was hired to teach poetry and literature at Pitzer College in Claremont where he taught until 1978. Bert Meyers died of lung cancer in 1979, at the young age of 51.

‘During the last period of his life as a professor Meyers not only finally had the time offered by academia to focus on his writing, he also had an important and lasting influence on some of his most talented students, a new generation of poets and writers, including ; Dennis Cooper, Amy Gerstler, Garrett Hongo and Mauyra Simon among others.’ — Bertmeyers.com

 

Bert Meyers Website
Fire Undressed My Bones: Remembering Poet Bert Meyers
A Gardener in Paradise
On Bert Meyers
Buy ‘Bert Meyers: On the Life and Work of an American Master’

 

Bert Meyers: On the Life and Work of an American Master
Pleiades Press / The Unsung Masters Series

‘Bert Meyers is an American original—a brilliant poet whose use of tone and figurative language was so emotive, intelligent and nuanced, it became inimitable, became its own unique perspective on our world. I wouldn’t be surprised if mid-21st century scholars announce that in Bert Meyers we have overlooked the best poet of his generation. Immense gratitude to Dana Levin and Adele Williams for this rediscovery.’ — Ilya Kaminsky

Excerpts

L.A.

The world’s largest ashtray,
the latest in concrete,
capital of the absurd;
one huge studio
where people drive
from set to set and everyone’s
from a different planet.

For miles, the palm trees,
exotic janitors,
sweep out the sky at dusk.
The gray air molds.
Geraniums heat the alleys.
Jasmine and gasoline
undress the night.

This is the desert
that lost its mind,
the place that boredom built.
Freeways, condominiums, malls,
where cartons of trash and diamonds
and ideologies
are opened, used, dumped near the sea.

 

**

Stars Climb Girders of Light

Stars climb girders of light.
They arrange themselves
in the usual place,
they quit before dawn,
and nothing’s been done.

Then men come out.
Their helmets fill the sky;
their cities rise and fall
and men descend,
proud carpenters of dew.

Man brief as the storm,
more than five feet of lightning,
twisted and beautiful.
Man made like his roads,
with somewhere to go.

 

**

Driving Home at Night with My Children After Their Grandfather’s Funeral

See how the moon follows us?
That’s Grandpa’s face in the sky.
It smiles; so, he’s still the same.
Sleep. The way home’s always
shorter than the way you came.

Shh …  the car’s a steel measure
that swallows the road like a tape;
and we’ll all live twice as long
as it takes the snail to go
around the world on its crumpled skate.

 

**

The Poets

There he sat among them
(his old friends) a walking ash
that knows how to smile.
And he still dreamed of a style
so clear it could wash a face,
or make a dry mouth sing.
But they laughed, having found
themselves more astonishing.

They would drive their minds
prismatic, strange, each wrapped
in his own ecstatic wires,
over a cliff for language,
while he remained to raise
a few birds from a blank page.

Extras


Bert Meyers recorded 2-20-75 at the Poetry Center


DANA LEVIN reads BERT MEYERS

 

 

_______________

‘You always remember the first time you read – or hear – a poem by Alice Notley. I was in my early 20s, sitting in a cold room in a house in Oakland late in the evening. A friend played a recording of ‘At Night the States’ (1985), from a reading Notley had given in Buffalo in 1987. Her voice spilled into the bedroom like a pearl-grey fog rolling over the Bay: ‘At night the states / I forget them or I wish I was there / in that one under the / Stars.’ I bolted upright. Notley was a name I had always heard in connection to her husband, the poet Ted Berrigan, a grandee of the New York School who still loomed large over poetry students like us, though he had been dead since the early 1980s. ‘At Night the States’ is her final elegy for him, written two years after he died; I almost always fail to describe its power when recommending it to friends. Just listen, I say. The recording lasts for 8 minutes and 55 seconds. ‘Play that again,’ I asked that night in Oakland. And again, and again.

‘Next month, Fonograf Editions will publish two new collections by Notley – The Speak Angel Series and Early Works. The first of these brings together six interrelated volumes of an epic poem that follows her 1992 book The Descent of Alette. Tantalizing excerpts have appeared for some years now. Expect this lyric narrative to resemble her other experiments in long-form poetry, constructed out of some voices that are decidedly alive and others raised out of the numinous ‘beyond’. ‘Dead people talk to me,’ she told the Los Angeles Review of Books in 2016. ‘I don’t know what they are doing precisely. A lot of my recent work is trying to find out what they are doing.’ Early Works will see into print, for the first time in decades, Notley’s first four books, as well as 80 pages of previously uncollected material from the 1970s and ’80s – all essential reading.’ — Andrew Durbin

 

Alice Notley @ Wikipedia
Alice Notley @ Twitter
Alice Notley and the Art of Not Giving a Damn
Seeing the Future: A Conversation with Alice Notley
Buy ‘Early Works’

 

Alice Notley Early Works
Fonograf Editions

‘In the author’s note that begins Grave of Light: New and Selected Poems 1970-2005, Alice Notley writes, “My publishing history is awkward and untidy, though colorful and even beautiful.” I have always been enamored of this sentence, which reminds us that an array of dispersed and varying publishing contexts are the original sites that give shape to such a book’s form. It is also something of an invitation into that color and untidiness, a prompt to become more curious about the awkwardness and beauty of Notley’s publishing history. This book, Early Works, accounts for a significant portion of that history by bringing back into print the complete versions of her first four books, a little-known 22-poem sonnet sequence, and a large selection of early uncollected poems gathered from little magazines. In doing so, Early Works joins an important set of recent volumes that put Notley’s earlier poetry back into circulation, including Manhattan Luck (Hearts Desire, 2014), which collects four long poems written between 1978 and 1984, and Songs for the Unborn Second Baby, originally published by United Artists in 1979 and reissued in a facsimile edition by London-based Distance No Object in 2021. Each in their own way, and especially taken together, these books continue to confirm that, as Ted Berrigan writes in The Poetry Project Newsletter in 1981, “Alice Notley is even better than anyone has yet said she is.”’ — Nick Strum

Excerpts

You

You’re not a giver
You’re a taker & tolerator

*

I’m a natural born person
And don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about

*

KEEP AWAY FROM SMALL CHILDREN
Like me
I kill people
And throw their entrails into the sea

 

**

Three

I’m so weak! and rain
again instead of noble
anger I cry some and talk
like a fish, underwater and
little bubbles words breaking

because we love each other
noble stands against each
other are out of the question
not of the question

everyone’s crying today
the baby and I the sea
is the sky

—————————-Emerging
out of another spell that’s
a circle
———————-Concentric circles
like bangle bracelets slipping
over in and out of each other

Maybe I’m supposed to spend
this life finding out by
finding out about not succeeding
——————————————————No
I don’t believe like that, yet
I’m writing holding a baby
and I realise, myself, I haven’t
myself, haven’t a self
and me wanting to impress you
with my universal and wise and
crystalline beautiful flowering
and form, O my person!
——————————————–My person
is smears of prints
from all the touchings—–layers
of prints
——————right down to
the one fist of crystal
I mean the one
the one that smashes through
like death and power

 

**

April

broke the bed fucking
morning tears
poems guests chatty birds

friendly neighbor zero
typically interesting dump
new flowers yellow pink scarlet

& sometimes looking pretty cold
grand piano
grandly inaccurate pianist

Extras


everyday life


2022.4.21 Alice Notley, atelier Michael Woolworth, Paris

 

 

______________

‘Doug Lang has been one of those poets and writers who publish extremely sparingly, and except for his first book, the novel FREAKS, published in 1973 by a commercial paperback publisher (New English Library) his work has come out from relatively obscure small presses. Including this latest book (Primary Writing in Washington DC).

‘But among aficionados of alternative poetry (or whatever term we use now for poetry that is not what the general public thinks of when they think of poetry) Lang has always been a deeply admired but too well-kept secret favorite. Full disclosure, I’ve known and admired and been a friend of Doug’s for decades now (as I am with the people who were able to get him to put this collection together and help publish it, but also as I happen to be with thousands of poets and writers so it’d be pretty difficult to avoid writing about folks I know personally), but I have plenty of creative friends whose work I am not afraid to criticize harshly. If I didn’t know Doug Lang I’d still love and admire his work, especially this latest book.

‘The gift Lang gives his readers is not just his reinvention of the sonnet form, but using every approach to reinventing how the content of these sonnets could be created, from found writing and sampling to acquisition and excerpting to original content with parody, homage, scholarship, tips-of-the-hat(s) and more, often fragmentary, never seen before in sonnet form and all structured by juxtaposing these techniques and many others with often seemingly arbitrary frames determined by what also often seems like chance or arbitrary determinants.

‘Ah, there’s hardly a language for what the variety of techniques seem to be, at least not for me. I can’t reproduce the look of many of these sonnets here because most of the lines are too long for this computer format unless I were to reduce the type to unreadable (for me).’ — Michael Lally

 

Doug Lang in America (Terence Winch)
REMEMBERING DOUG LANG
Remembrances: Doug Lang (1941–2022)
DÉRANGÉ BY DOUG LANG
Buy ‘In the Works’

 

Doug Lang In the Works
Edge Books

‘The delight of play and the play of light, atolls of wit and the wit of soul, the hilarity of the words and worlds of hilarity: Doug Lang’s saucy, irresistible impishness and explosive intelligence make his poetry as intoxicating as it is inimitable. In his fortune cookie poem Lang writes, “Your sense of humor is of no use to you” –– but it is to us. This is nude formalism avant la lettre. And then some.’ — Charles Bernstein

‘Doug Lang’s poems are the only poems that matter, the only poems to undo matter and matter’s semolina mango afore the great splatter — he has written the only sestinas I can stand, much less admire amidst the undead security guards & golfers lying dude fried. As the great Patrick Ewing told his boys once he made the NBA & played against Larry Bird for the first time, this motherfucker is the Truth! I can attest that Irish Americans know that change is bad — & in the future you will look at me and say, “No kidding?” All the diction, all the play, all the prosody, all the graphs of the mind moving and retooling, all the if you see someone, why not have doubts are here. This is a hell of a book, the soulful revolution of wild flying crab language beyond sex with microbes. Are you sure you deserve it?’ — Anselm Berrigan

Excerpts

THE DEPRESSION

Charlie Green was a member of Fletcher Henderson’s
Orchestra, played trombone, cut 38 sides with Bessie
Smith, froze to death on the doorstep of a Harlem
Tenement during the depression. The snow keeps coming
Down. Well, let it come down. The city gets
Kind of white. Your body is cool.
I forget when I look in your face how far back.
Details, standing around. Everything goes out.
Face back. Heat eases
Up. Suspended. You bring wine, you talk. I like
To hear you talk, the way you talk.
I get nervous, anyway. Follow me up, through
The clocks, Mister B.
B for boss. The book I toss.
She who longs for the red hot songs of Robert Johnson.
And so the bread is baked by you now, maybe draw
Some beer & sit for hours, you had it spaced wrong.
Saturn a bromide & Irish cream & footsteps on Sullivan
Street & Burgundy from the mountains, the mountains
Of romance, talk to me. Fat chance.
Tight wire risk.
The onion & onion.
Umbrellas from you, all broken.
Drunk & stoned & crazy 3 in the morning phone ringing.
The most difficult a relationship
Of air & what is wrong.
Trying to remember where the wall is.
Margaret Johnson came in from Kansas City &
Played piano on one record date with Billie Holiday,
Buck Clayton, Dickie Wells, Lester Young,
Freddy Greene, Walter Page & Jo Jones.
& Lester Young said, “I have eyes & I can see.”

 

**

STIIN IF MIGGIK SONNET
For Corliss Skicki

Be warned if you should feel like doing this quest I think it has been nerfed.I have an agnostic enchanter and I cannot get the Ogres to let me do the turn ins.
I’ve slaughtered many Dwarf guards and still nothing. I cannot even do the newbie
Lizardman Meat quest to raise faction. Clurg and the Warrior guildmaster are

indifferent to me, and its not good enough. I’ve finally raised my faction enough to
do the Lizardman Meat quest and after tons of tons of turn in Clurg still does not
like me well enough and the alliance line of spells do not work on him anymore. As
much as I would like to do this quest for old times sake it just doesn’t seem I am

going to be able to. I’ve tried Ogre illusion and DE illusion both to no avail.
Just trying this quest so my chanter could bake some more and as of today Frostbite
is still broken. After reading many posts on other pages and such, I see that you
must now cast idenify on the Regurgitonic to see if it’s bad or not. Guess I’ll try

that and go get a new one. That’s a long run if it is so I would try it before you run all
the way back to Frostbite in West Karana. Hope this helps everyone, i.e. fuckwits

 

**

TINA SESTINA

Please, what is this process to which we refer as semolina?
Hello? Spending all your time in the cantina?
Please, I got these words from a page in a book of poems by Mina
Loy. Now I see that over the whole of Washington there is a strange blue patina.
And you know how much we all miss Corinna.
Like as much as there are as many ducks in all of Carolina.

Carobola. Carobingo. Carolampus. Carolina. Carolingus. Carolina.
Semi-Demi. Semolana. Semalapon. Semolina.
Corri. Corridora. Corrigendum, Corinna. Corinna.
Cannoli. Cannula. Canononical. Canopry. Cantina.
P’p’p’p’p’p’p’p’p patina.
Mama mia. Mama mama. Mama Mina.

Mina Loy. Mi. Na. Mina. Mindbending mindbending mindblowing mindboggling Mina
Loy. Blue mountains to the north of the walls in Carolina.
Munching on a plum a patina
Of your desolation. This is what you call semolina?
Unchanging motion in a straight line? Resulting from the absence of a force in the cantina?
This is a portrait of somebody, some other than Corinna.

The memory of the memory of Corinna.
With the publication of Galileo’s Discorsi in 1638, Mina
Loy started spending all her nights praying in the cantina
Gravitationally collapsing thermal particles all over Carolina
Frontal lobe all semolina
Zero-angular-momentum state of the patina

You are the mystic boss of Lobachevskian space: and time is a patina
You use to unlock the grid confining Corinna
As the photon’s wave function impinges on the semolina
Unlike Smoot’s God ? more like Hawking’s evaporation time now under the spell of Mina
Under the spell of Poincaré under the spell of Mozart in the continuum known as Carolina
And after the Turing machine comes to a halt, you might leave the cantina

Who is not afraid of the cantina?
Who is not in love with the patina?
Who is not alone in Carolina?
Who is not beguiled by Corinna?
Who is not Mina
Loy? There is no authentic semolina.

Dante conceived it: the cantina. Beyond Tuscany there is Corinna.
This black snake dualism is all patina. With Mina
Smoking like a fissure deep in Carolina, I am the semolina

Extras


Doug Lang reading ‘The Americans’ 1 May 2013


Doug Lang & Ron Silliman

 

 

________________

‘Sara Nicholson’s allusive poetry of inquiry is composed with close attention to syllable and syntax. In a 2015 review of The Living Method for A Perimeter, Hajara Quinn observes that “Nicholson establishes a metaphysical attraction to a multi-disciplinary poetics,” while on the Public Books blog list of the best poetry books of 2013-2014, poet Geoffrey G. O’Brien chose The Living Method, stating, “the method is more than meter, it’s meter’s living purpose: Nicholson wields the authority of archival rhythms and the forceful syntax of a logician, but she constantly attaches these certainties to a wildness of premise and a brevity of figure: instead of self, ruled utterance; instead of help, poetry.”

Joshua Edwards has noted, “Nicholson’s poems, diverse as they are, are all intensely bold. Sure, they are often aphoristic and declamatory, but this is not the sort of boldness that I mean. I mean a boldness akin to that of Catullus and Dickinson. Like them, Nicholson makes the page into an eye that stares directly.” In an author’s note for her poem “The Burden,” Nicholson states, “A creative writing teacher once told me that I didn’t know how to use prepositions. I’m still not sure I’ve mastered them. Not knowing’s not exactly a burden I carry along with or inside or behind me. Instead, I think of it as my refrain.”’ — Poetry Foundation

 

Sara Nicholson’s “The Art of Symmetry”
Ten Lyric Pieces, by Sara Nicholson
Two Poems by Sara Nicholson
Sara Nicholson – six poems
Buy ‘April’

 

Sara Nicholson April
The Song Cave

‘Deadpan, heartfelt, and everything in between, Sara Nicholson is a reluctant mystic who can both make us laugh and point us toward magical truths within a single poem. Her third collection of poems, APRIL, is filled with the perverse and the sacred, whether the subject is art, love, or sex, whether it’s ancient or contemporary. Nicholson’s interests are timeless, and by the end of April, the reader may be convinced that they’ve brushed up against a somewhat strange and singular poet who is inventing a new way of seeing specifically for them.’ — TSC

Excerpts

Spain

Having never been to Spain
I left for it, as one who
Hazards faith in vagueness. The rose
Shrieks each autumn, dies
Tragically. The pomegranate, too,
Has nothing of interest to say.
All fruit trees flower
But in Spain, they florecen—minor Differences of sounds like these
The traveler must learn.
One must occasionally allow oneself Bourgeois imaginings
As of wine flights by the sea
Or the carpeted staircases
Of castles, renovated by the state.
I am a very rich woman
Who winters in Tenerife, the Spanish crown Seeks my guidance on all matters Tenerife-related. I feel
Melancholy when it snows
Over the Atlantic, from the window
Of my castillo. Mere presence
With no cause for concern
My life is lived
For me by others, portioned out In intervals of rest and music
(It should be obvious
By now that I have many servants. All are well paid).
The white buildings of Cádiz Communicate in pictures other truths Than those intended.
The act of reading
Has become for me a form
Of blunt force trauma to the head.
Thus was I persuaded
To enter this sanitorium
Where beneath the well-clipped ilex Acorn-fed swine roam wild
Until the peasants slaughter them
For their sweet flesh, rumored
To have healing properties—I am here For my health, trusting
That the Mediterranean will work
Its slow miracle on the brain. I was born For convalescence, the daughter
Of Doña Maria, Baronesa.
Each September
I leave a flower on her grave.

 

**

The Archetype

Even Cézanne painted her, naked of course,
reclining on a chair. The mythical
Leda, mother of Helen, raped by a metamorphosed
Zeus in the guise of a swan.
She faces front, and we can almost see
everything—the hips, the uneven
Breasts, the nipples that echo her blush-pink
knees and cheeks, but not
Her vulva, as it’s cloaked by a twisted
piece of cloth. She looks bored.
Unlike Delacroix’s Leda, who appears to be choking
the neck of the swan, her back
Facing us, hiding from view her naughtier
bits which, however, I think,
The swan can still see. Cézanne’s Zeus
bites Leda’s wrist. Or maybe he’s
Shaking her awake? Like the way Yeats’s bird
pecks at her, grabs her “nape”
In his “bill” in mid-air; this is a sonnet
and by the volta we learn
Her vagina is Troy. I don’t like the modern
paintings of her story. I prefer
Those Renaissance Ledas, plopped in
landscapes rich in Arcadian
Cliché—chasms, mountains, and clumps
of woods; palazzi with views of
The Florentine hills. Michaelangelo painted them
fucking. Correggio, too, who stuffs
His canvas with babies and angels, lyres,
flutes, swans, and naked ladies
Who bear witness to the mytho-erotic act.
But Da Vinci’s Leda forgoes
The sex, depicts instead the hatchlings
Castor and Pollux, Helen
and Clytemnestra, sons and daughters of
Zeus who bears the Aegis,
Her fledgling brood, all pudgy, balding,
and bandy-legged, tenderly
Dwarfed by their shells. Still others chose
to depict her inside, to move from
The public to the private sphere, as in Veronese’s
Leda, where we, the voyeur,
Watch the two embrace, she with a hand
at the base of his tail, he sticking
His beak in her mouth. She’s naked, apart from
her jewelry. The boudoir’s
Draped in velvet, her hair bedewed
with pearls. We are meant
To be titillated—this is adultery, after all,
however grotesque—so it’s ok
If you feel a frisson as you eavesdrop
on the primal scene.

My favorite Leda is also en couchant, splayed
wide before divinity, so wide
We get an unobstructed view of her
vagina while the swan
Peers into it, transfixed as by the void of
archaic memory. Call it
The ornithological gaze. This Leda
has no author, is attributed
to François Boucher, master of the Rococo
nude, the plump and idle
Venus on a chaise. Each of the above
mentioned artists paints
The sex as consensual, as seduction rather than
rape. Therefore Leda’s story
Is the story of interpretation itself
in every possible style—
There are Pre-Raphaelite Ledas, cubist,
surrealist and neoclassical
Ones. You can find her in miniature
and on the decorative
Lids of snuffboxes, in mosaic and frieze.
Yet Twombly’s is the only Leda
To eschew both nudity and naivete. Its subject
is, we might say, movement
Itself—the flapping wings, the shock and
clash, the chaos and the strife.
Crazy brushstrokes, lines and dripping paint
suggest feathers, maybe
Blood, too. He has obviously painted
a rape. I was inspired
By my research to look up YouTube
videos of swans mating and
As you might’ve guessed, swan sex is difficult
to watch—the male grabs
The female’s neck, holds her head
underwater for so long
She occasionally drowns. A user named
Geof commented “Um there
Bangin” and not to kink-shame the natural
but with Mr.Bright68 I’d have
To agree: “This is not normal not love.”
The Old Masters, I’m shocked
Not one of them ever chose to paint
the egg-laying, or to pair her
With another of those mythical feminine
archetypes—the Fates and Furies,
The loathly lady, a huntress or gorgon
with snakes for hair. I’d like
To see Leda in Heaven, or like Persephone
rule death, restore flowers
To usher in Spring. To see her wander
like Odysseus to Circe’s
Island, wave at Scylla and Charybdis
on her way to Hell.
She might have murdered Tyndareus,
her husband, a King of Sparta.

Like Medea, she could’ve smashed her eggs.
The oldest works of art
To depict Leda’s story—a Greek amphora
now in Los Angeles, a fresco
In Pompeii—show her kissing and fucking
the swan, respectively. In one
She stares right at us, from the ruins
of a Roman bedroom. In one
She is naked, but in the other, clothed.

Extras


Sara Nicholson – Holloway Reading


Sara Nicholson + Mei-mei Berssenbrugge @ The Lab, SF (4.24.23)

 

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** Dominik, Hi!!! It seems like all of her novels individually are out of print. I think the only book in print, or at least close to being in print, is a collection called ‘Three Novels’. Love reminded me to print out the docs and sign them but not to walk to the FedEx office to send them, but he cut me some slack as long as I walk over there this morning. Love writing an epic poem entitled ‘Bite Me’, G. ** A, Hi. Zac is still out of town until, I think, tomorrow. Ha ha, dude, you are relentless. Is that a Greek thing? Me too: imprisoned in my town working until the leaves turn brown again. ** Nightcrawler, Hi, my pleasure. ** Jack Skelley, Cool, yeah, they’re nice, right? Uh, there’s a kind of style intersect between her paintings and novels, but the novels are kind of wackier, you know, very sort of late 60s playful a la McGuane and ‘Electric Kool Aid …’ but slightly noir or something. Her stuff is way out of print. Maybe Ruben can dig around in the now darkweb-locked zLibrary and find something? I’m … fiddling with pre-existing writing more than writing, although the fiddling is writing, so … yeah? Sounds like a fun gig. I’ll go see what I can listen to re: Double Naught Spy Car. I guess you didn’t go to Cruel World? I saw videos. Iggy looks like a pile of mud. Ooh, excerpt! Everyone, You can take a sneak peek at Jack Skelley’s legendary and soon-to-be republished masterwork ‘Fear of Kathy Acker’ via an excerpt on the Mousse Magazine site here and also read a bit of Sabrina Tarasoff’s outro while you’re there! Do what you have to do to keep that outflow of crazy new shit a gusher. Coucou, Dennis. ** Bernard Welt, You didn’t talk to me, but hi anyway. xo. ** David Ehrenstein, Yes, I didn’t even mention her plays, silly me. ** Nick., I know I’m romanticising wildly, but I miss the days when I didn’t know what was going to happen anymore. But, yeah, when it’s love or lack of love related, that’s a special, unpleasant case. At a certain point, I got really into friendship and decided fuck love, but I’m basically wedded to writing so maybe that’s why it seems to work. And then there’s drugs, yeah. I survived caring about things that didn’t care about me by writing tons of poems about that. I guess it worked? Sorry, though. I know that’s hard. Consider me an open ear. ** Jim Pedersen, Hi, Jim! So awesome to have you here! I can imagine Hudson liking her work for sure. Maybe he told me so. Anyway, damn, that would have been a great and very Feature-y show too. You good, pal? ** Cody Goodnight, No apology necessary of course. Wow, New Orleans. Safe trip if you haven’t headed off yet. I’m very fond of Steely Dan. And, of course, ‘Evol’. I wanted to title one of my novels ‘Evol’ but my publisher wouldn’t let me. So it ended being called ‘Try’. Zac and I often go on toad trips and we almost always listen to the first two Pinback albums — ‘Pinback’ and ‘Blue Screen Life’ — at some point on the drives. Have a fanatic time, pal! ** Misanthrope, I long for the days when big music venue weren’t the name of the company that owns them. The big music venue in downtown LA is called Crypto.com Arena for goodness sake. Sad that KIX ended their long and storied career by sucking. I think Martin Amis is/was a very clever and even gifted conventional sentence writer. I personally preferred his non-fiction, but, sure, RIP. ** Telly (formerly loser and twelve), Hey there! Telly is a fun name. ‘The Cosmopolitan Girl’ is o.o.p. and pricey, but it seems like you could probably pick it up for chump change at the right thrift store. Where can I see your comics? Tell me please. The SF Zine Fest would be insane not to take you, I can tell. ** _Black_Acrylic, Nice, your Leeds day. It was almost too warm here yesterday, and now it’s borderline pouring rain. Yeah, I can’t think of a 2000s UK pop act that I was into, come to think of it. There must be someone. ** Minet, No, I don’t know Brisseau’s ‘White Wedding’. Is it named after the Billy Idol song, I hope not? Homerun! I knew you could do it! I do think I remember life being quite weird when I was 23, it’s true. Good weird. I think I do know the type you describe, although the Scott Walker ingredient is an interesting head scratcher of sorts. Anyway, lucky all of them! I sleep pretty okay so you can some of mine if you need. Or you can just do what I do and take Melatonin every night. Enjoy everything! You are, right? Hugs. ** Kettering, Ha ha, that’s very thoughtful of you. Have had a lovely day yourself! ** malcolm, Oh, interesting, yes, I’ll go recheck the Alan Boyce commenting arena. How curious. For his eyes only, gotcha. That certainly seems like the best and most powerful way to go about it, whatever its longterm fate. I’ve written or made things like you’re making, and it’s the best use of one’s talent, if you ask me. 10k words of your most intensely gay thoughts is a pretty charismatic descriptor, so … yes. Keep it going, and see you tomorrow. ** Right. Today I give you five books I read in recent days and loved, and this time they’re all poetry books. Exact your interest on them please. See you tomorrow.

Galerie Dennis Cooper presents … Rosalyn Drexler

 

‘As a writer Rosalyn Drexler enjoyed considerable success during the 1960s and ’70s. Her many novels were critically well received, she won Obies for three of her plays, and an Emmy for a Lily Tomlin special. As a visual artist, however, Drexler was less successful, unfortunately experiencing what George Kubler would have called a “bad entrance.” In The Shape of Time (1962} Kubler explains that an individual artist’s success will often depend less on temperament, talent, and training than on luck, on where in the artistic tradition “his biological opportunity coincides.” The artist whose temperament coincides with the early stage of a tradition is luckier than the one who follows later. With regard to timing, at least, Drexler would appear to have been very fortunate. She began using popular imagery late in 1961 at precisely the same time as Warhol, Lichtenstein, and the other celebrated pioneers of the Pop movement. Although Drexler is mentioned in the early histories of Pop, she received little serious attention at the time. As Robert Storr so nicely put it in a recent reappraisal of her work for a Rosenwald­ Wolf Gallery catalogue, “It is the fate of some artists to arrive at the station on time, and still find themselves being left on the platform as the train pulls away without them.” Drexler’s problem was two-fold. Firstly, her work was not consistent with period taste.

‘Her themes were hot in an era of cool. And what was perhaps worse, her works evoked narratives at a time when the art world seemed to have accepted critic Clement Greenberg’s judgment that stories belonged to literature, not the visual arts. Her second problem was gender. In the sixties art was still a male domain, as the pronoun in the Kubler quote above will attest.

‘Drexler’s bigger problem, as it turned out, was that she was too early. The train on which she belonged would not arrive at the station for another two decades. This train would not only welcome women passengers as a result of the feminist movement of the 1970s but had a special car for the Metro Pictures stable of artists such as Cindy Sherman, Richard Prince, and Robert Longo whose interests were very similar to Drexler’s. Longo’s Men in the Cities series, in particular, closely resembled her early work and was often mistaken as such. It was in the context of these developments of the 1970s and early ’80s that a serious reassessment of Drexler’s pioneering work was not only possible but mandatory.

‘Drexler began making visual art in the early 1950s while living in Berkeley, California, where Sherman was finishing his art degree. An early and unrecognized participant in the assemblage movement that would shortly blossom in the Bay kea, Los Angeles, and New York, she began producing art with trash found at home and in the city streets in order to create a kind of true-to-life museum in her home. In 1955-56 she and Sherman had a two­ person exhibition at the Courtyard Gallery. Unlike the well-known Bay kea assemblers, such as Bruce Conner, whose use of junk represented an implicit rejection of American postwar consumerism, Drexler had no social agenda. Nor was she even aware of the budding San Francisco Renaissance centered at the City Lights Bookstore, although she knew its most famous participant, Allen Ginsberg. “If there was a burgeoning counterculture in the SF area,” she claims, “I didn’t know about it. I wasn’t part of anything. I was a loner.” On the subject of her work, she said at the time, “I perform rescue work (in memory of the death of the Little Tin Soldier who was lost forever in a sewer). I peruse the sewer with wonder and love.”

‘In order to accentuate the fragile, messy lives of her poignant incarnations of the human condition-such as Pregnant Princess and Grown-up Lolita Doll, both late 1950s-she began adding touches of raw plaster and crude color.

‘In 1960, shortly after her return to New York, she showed her sculpture at the recently opened Reuben Gallery, where Allan Kaprow and his Rutgers colleagues in Fluxus exhibited. Drexler was given an exhibition on the recommendation of the critic-turned-dealer Ivan Karp, whom she had recently met at an exhibition and who was arguably the best-informed observer of the avant-garde scene in the city at the time. Through Karp, Drexler began socializing with a number of the established and emerging artists of various stripes, from Elaine de Kooning to Donald Judd to Andy Warhol, who made a small series of silkscreen paintings after a Polaroid he took of her dressed as a wrestler.

‘Drexler gave up sculpture in 1961, despite the encouragement and recommendation of David Smith, partly because “it became too difficult to lug that stuff around.” She turned, instead, to painting themes borrowed from popular culture. “I was very guilty about it,” she later admitted, “achieving something not out of your [own) head. Little did I know [this technique] would become so hot.” As her remarks indicate, she began to appropriate popular materials not because of the contemporaneous examples of artists such as Lichtenstein and Warhol-to which Karp introduced her shortly after she began working with similar sources-but because of the same confluence of art-world influences that led them and others almost simultaneously to recognize the value of popular imagery as a lingua franca, most important of which was the permissive examples provided by Rauschenberg and Johns. And for Drexler, the use of “what I, a homemaker, had available in the house: magazines, posters, etc.” was a natural extension of her approach to sculpture.

‘Drexler clipped images from magazines and newspapers, attached them to canvas or board and then selectively painted out details with acrylics to emphasize the essential action, which she ordinarily set against a contrasting, largely empty monochromatic ground. She soon learned how to enlarge copies on paper, which she also attached to canvas and overpainted. This also meant that she could consider a larger range of source materials, which now included books on Hollywood and photographs borrowed from the library.’ — Bradford R. Collins

 

____
Further

Rosalyn Drexler @ Wikipedia
Rosalyn Drexler: Wrestling Feminist in the Pop Art World
Rosalyn Drexler: Who Does She Think She Is?
Rosalyn Drexler: An Imagination at Work
Prudence Peiffer on Rosalyn Drexler
Rosalyn Drexler’s Noir Paintings
Caught Up in Rosalyn Drexler’s Dramatic Moments
Rosalyn Drexler Does Not Look Back
Rosalyn Drexler with John Yau
‘Dear’, by Rosalyn Drexler
Rosalyn Drexler: Varieties of Reclamation
Rosalyn Drexler @ goodreads
Rosalyn Drexler: “You couldn’t have known my work. How could you?”
Sad and Bad and Mad: The Fiction of Rosalyn Drexler
ROSALYN DREXLER IS PRETTY GREAT

 

____
Extras


Artist Talk: Rosalyn Drexler


Seductive Subversion: Rosalyn Drexler


Excerpts from an interview with Rosalyn Drexler

 

_____
The novels
from The Reading Experience

 

‘Perhaps it is because her most lasting accomplishment may turn out to be her paintings that Rosalyn Drexler is now so very little known as a writer of fiction. Although she did attract attention with her novels in the 1970s, and her plays gained notice for their association with the “theater of the ridiculous,” a kind of variation on theater of the absurd, it seems safe to say that for most current readers and critics Rosalyn Drexler has almost no name recognition. Perhaps the novels to an extent seem dated, their cultural references and lingo too stuck in the 60s and 70s (although ultimately they are not at all trying to “capture” their era in any direct way). Or perhaps Drexler has simply been overshadowed by the already established experimental writers of her time, most of whom are male, even at a time when efforts are regularly made, by academics and publishers, to maintain attention on neglected women writers.

‘Still, that little effort has been made to refocus our attention on the fiction of Rosalyn Drexler remains rather surprising, for her novels are indeed singular achievements, adventurous works that are entirely worthy of comparison with the other heterodox writing of the period that has persisted in the cultural memory. Moreover, while Drexler’s work is not feminist in a directly political way, it most assuredly does provide a representation of women and their circumstances that feminist critics ought to find deeply resonant (something that could be said about Drexler’s paintings as well). And if many of the novels do indeed reflect the social and cultural tendencies of their time, they also use those tendencies to render more broadly and enduringly relevant accounts of women freely expressing their own versions of their lived experience and in the process freeing themselves of the versions imposed by others.

‘The best illustration of this perhaps is her third novel, To Smithereens (1972), which features a lady wrestler as protagonist and is perhaps her best known work of fiction, largely because it draws on Drexler’s own experience as a wrestler before she became established as an artist. As in many of the paintings, here Drexler uses the iconography associated with this figure from popular culture to evoke attitudes and beliefs about the pervasive violence of American culture and the confused state of relations between men and women. The latter is signaled in the novel’s first scene, narrated by Rosa (later to be proclaimed “Rosa Carlo, the Mexican Spitfire”), who in a movie theater encounters a “creep” in the next seat rubbing his hand on her thigh. Rosa is duly annoyed, expressing her annoyance by lashing out at him, yet agrees to have coffee with him after the movie and then goes to his apartment, where soon she waits for him in the bedroom: “I took off my clothes and lay on top of the blanket, still as death, one arm dangling off the side of the mattress; I knew I looked beautiful that way; soft, receptive, passively offering my body. . . .”

‘The creep is (once again) named Paul, in this case an art critic, and he and Rosa are soon a couple. But while in this scene Rosa chooses to be sexually passive, throughout the novel she continues to exhibit both the aggressiveness she displayed in the movie theater (and which presumably she channels in her short career as a wrestler) and a more conventional acceptance of gendered sexual roles. (When she decides to try wrestling Rosa discovers a lesbian subculture among the women wrestlers, but she does not take part.) Still, while Paul in a sense is trying to exploit Rosa for his own enjoyment when he encourages her to try wrestling, his efforts to control her cannot succeed, as he himself acknowledges:

Rosa did not conform to any idea I had conceived of her in advance. She related to me with the same sense of immediacy and beauty that the artist experiences in relation to her material. She was molding me on behalf of the vast world of being she existed in; while I had foolishly believed it was I who was shaping her.

‘The point of view in To Smithereens alternates between Paul and Rosa (with the usual additional interpolated documents), and this provides overall a somewhat more detached perspective from which the reader can contemplate the comic verbal collage Drexler has assembled, although undoubtedly Rosa emerges from the novel a character as forceful as Paul himself finds her. The novel does not really dwell much on Rosa’s actual time in the wrestling ring (only one match is recounted at any length), preferring just to introduce us to the colorful characters with whom Rosa interacts and to create a female character who embodies in her life the “sense of immediacy and beauty that the artist experiences in relation to her material” but has perhaps not yet quite found the best “material” in which to express it.

The Cosmopolitan Girl (1974) is the last of the original series of novels that made Drexler known as a writer as well as an artist. (It is available. along with I Am The Beautiful Stranger and One or Another, in a volume simply called Three Novels, published by Verbivoracious Press, the only fiction by Drexler officially in print.) This might be called Drexler’s weirdest novel (an accomplishment in itself). Certainly it is the most openly surreal, featuring a protagonist with a talking dog, a dog she winds up marrying to boot. While this blending of Kafka and Helen Gurley Brown is alternately kooky and spooky, perhaps it also represents Drexler’s most faithful translation of the Pop sensibility characteristic of her paintings to fiction, provoking equal parts disquiet, amusement, and something like annoyance. It can be difficult to decide whether we should find Helen Jones a sympathetic character just attempting to find happiness in the big wide world, or an appalling freak. Perhaps she is both. The media image of the Cosmo Girl becomes not exactly the object of satire, nor is it celebrated as a fabulous icon of popular culture, although certainly Drexler does occasionally have fun with it:

At home I walk around with no clothes on at all (depending on whether the steam is up). I do not bother to pull down the shade. If someone in the building opposite wants to look, he’s welcome. If someone doesn’t like it, that’s his problem. I do what makes me feel good. . .but not always. It’s a hard rule to follow because sometimes I’m not sure what does please me.

‘The Cosmopolitan Girl can be regarded as the completion of an initial quartet of singular but aesthetically consistent novels that introduce both a thematically and formally complex literary practice Drexler continues to pursue in her later fiction but that probably is carried out most successfully in these four novels. Unquestionably it would be warranted to claim Drexler’s project as part of post-60s feminism, but the women characters in these novels are neither unequivocal champions of equality nor emblematic figures exemplifying the inherent virtues of their gender. Ultimately each of these characters is emblematic only of herself, although they do have enough similarities that they collectively comprise a kind of Drexlerian prototype: autonomous, but not without a lingering dependency, self-aware but also at times willfully capricious.’

Buy ‘To Smithereens’
Buy ‘The Cosmopolitan Girl’
Buy ‘Three Novels’

 

____
Rosalyn Drexler speaks
from Artforum

 

It’s wonderful to be having a retrospective, like being a star again! Of course you also want to just run away.The show belongs to the people who created it now. It’s going to be wonderful, and then it’s going to be past, like all things. I’m going to try to be in the moment. Some of these artworks have been gone from me for fifty years. I’ve seen reproductions of them and wondered who did them, and thought, That’s pretty clever! So to see them all together will be incredible—one painting referring to another emotionally, and what was happening in my life at the time.

I don’t think my paintings were seen much back in the 1960s. It was the time for Abstract Expressionism and Minimalism; Pop was just beginning to rear its huge, glittering head. My work was a secret kind of thing. I was very close to the Abstract Expressionists, and to the women I worked with when we started Women in the Arts—but no one realized I was a painter because I was writing about painting. I was happy being productive and having good friends and being ignored. But now I’m getting angry about it, looking back!

I never thought about careers. I was even a wrestler for awhile. I learned how to look ominous and on top of things as I strode around the ring from corner to corner. But the truth is I hated it. I thought, Well, the experience should not be wasted—I should at least get a book out of it. I was also a waitress, cigarette girl, hatcheck, masseuse, anything to earn a living. And in between it all I was giving birth, writing books and plays, doing paintings, and going to parties. I met my husband Sherman when I was eighteen, married at nineteen, first kid when I was twenty and I was off to the races. I was married for sixty-nine years.

Our closest friends were Franz Kline, and Bill and Elaine de Kooning, and they used up all the oxygen in the room, they were such heavy hitters. I thought painting was serious and wonderful, but I couldn’t put myself in that class. I was divided; I must have really thought of myself as a writer. My books were doing very well, getting published and critiqued. And there wasn’t a lot of interest in my painting, so I didn’t have that same kind of encouragement that I think you need. And I had no idea that what I was doing would interest anybody deeply.

I never studied art. But my parents exposed me to it from an early age. A newspaper had a special: For twenty-five cents you could get art posters and books, and my mother bought me Turner seascapes, Dickens, Twain. And my father took me to a museum once and showed me a Chardin peach. I couldn’t understand how wonderful that peach was. Later, my husband would take me by the shoulders in a museum, and we would exchange ideas.

I’m still painting. My husband was dying in 2014, and I was with him almost all the time, and then I would go into my studio and start a painting. He was a great critic, and I was able to share the making of these works with him. And now I have to get over the mourning, the sorrow, and I suppose that will bring a whole new kind of work.

There’s a narrative thread going through all my work. It may not be seen but it’s in my head, like a kind of music. I get an idea to paint, and then I get ideas by painting. Some of the works do tell a story, but it’s not like sitting down and telling a story, or even using one word, like some artists today. I don’t use words in painting because I use words in books and articles.

My love of art—an exuberance and a feeling that I wanted to do something, that I wanted to express myself—comes from when I was young. I wanted to be a writer even though I had only written one paragraph. A friend introduced me to a publisher who said, “I like what you’ve written so far, and I’m coming back in two years—give me a novel.” To start, I told myself: Just be honest, say something that means something, and amuse yourself. Well, how do you do that? So I had to find out.

 

___
Show

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** Charalampos Tzanakis, Hi. Montparnasse isn’t as pretty as Pere Lachaise by far, but it is packed with greats. I used to really like the Curve song ‘Coast Is Clear’. I saw them live once, and there was something about them that made me suspicious, I don’t remember what. Wow, I hope your Crete move went very smoothly. Mm, no, I think I’ve maximised whatever LA held for me creatively, not that I wouldn’t be able to write there, but I think I’m more interested in being away from there apart from visits. But I was there for a really long time. ** Dominik, Hi!!! Yeah, as cool as the haunted house I imagine my grave would be, I’m definitely not ready to sacrifice myself for it. I want to get a text like that! All love has to do for me today is to keep reminding me to print out some tax documents and sign them and FedEx them to the guy doing my taxes for me by 5 pm, ugh, G. ** David Ehrenstein, I am, of course, in total agreement with you. ** Minet, Hi. Ha ha, my favorite Rohmer film is one you don’t like: ‘The Green Ray’. I also really like the one that most other Rohmer fans don’t like: ‘Perceval le Gallois’. It’s true, people here seem to be talking about Rohmer a lot more recently. Curious, but good. I do like Hong Sang-Soo, yes. I think he’s even said Rohmer was a huge influence on him. How was the party? Hard to imagine you weren’t a big hit there given your magnificent sounding style choice. Who doesn’t like a ’77 street hustler! ** Wheeler Winston Dixon, Hi! Oh, it’s a great pleasure and honor to have you here. Amazing, that footage, but how tragic that it’s lost. I only had the chance to meet him once. His book ‘Taylor Mead on Amphetamine and in Europe’ is so great. Someone really needs to republish that. Thank you so much for commenting. Everyone, the blog had the honor of being intersected by the great filmmaker Wheeler Winston Dixon over the weekend. I did a post about his work, here, if you don’t know his work or, of course, if you do. ** Darbz, Hi. Typing while suppressing giggles must be hard work. So, I nailed you with my first guess! What were the odds. Sounds like you might want to be the protector of that boy in the program. Either that or stay far away from him. Hard to pick. My day has just started, so who knows. If you mean yesterday, I saw friends. We drank coffee while looking at the Seine. It was very nice. Oh, I’m 6’1″ so almost everyone seems short to me. I’m a bad judge. I keep trying to talk writers I know into titling their next book ‘Dead Kid’s Ass’ because that’s what I wanted to title my second poetry book before all of my friends talked me out of it, so maybe name your snake Dead Kid’s Ass? ** A, Thomas knows how to make a post. I fact, I think I will be getting one by him very shortly. New with me? Really, I’m just in limbo waiting to start editing the film. Everything just seems hazy right now. I’ve had good Greek food in Paris. I don’t think there are all that many venues featuring it here, but I’ve been satisfied, I think. I went to Greece once in, mm, I think the early 00s. I was in Athens and then about five islands. I didn’t like Athens at all. But seeing the very pollution-yellowed Acropolis on that hill in the middle of the very polluted city was kind of depressingly profound. I liked Santorini a lot, but who doesn’t. ** Misanthrope, For a long time I thought Animal Collective just made up that name Merriweather Post Pavilion. You will be having Freddy dreams for the rest of your very short life, yes. ** Ian, Hi, Ian. Good to see ya. I’m fine. Writers I know who have kids tend to tell me it takes about two years to get totally back in full-on writer’s mode. I’ll be in Paris all summer because I’ll be editing Zac’s and my new film pretty much every day from morning til night. Well, you managed to produce a recent piece! Excited to read it. Everyone, Very fine writer Ian Townsend has a new short fiction piece up at the tragical site, and I highly recommend you hit it up. It’s here. ** _Black_Acrylic, Taylor Mead is the epitome of the term singularity. Ongoing sorriness about Leeds’s slumping. Hugs. Yeah, I was never into the Spice Girls for even a fraction of a second. ** Steve Erickson, I ran into Udo Kier a few times when he lived in LA — maybe he still does — and he was always a least a little plotzed and it was almost always at the check out counter of some store where he was shouting at the clerk ‘Don’t you know who I am?!’. Everyone, Here’s Mr. Erickson’s review of Kassa Overall’s “excellent” jazz-rap album ANIMALS. Big up re: the lightbulb! ** Jamie, Hi. My weekend was pleasant and mostly uneventful apart from a more than pleasant meet up with friends. Nice about the Luther Price screening, yes. When I was in LA during the film preproduction I saw Balthazar Clementi host a screening of his dad’s totally amazing film ‘À l’ombre de la canaille bleue’, and that was great, but it had English subtitles. Taylor Mead is great one to investigate in depth should the mood strike. Next time you’re in Paris I’m going to make you come over and make me nachos. I have to do a bunch of paperwork for my taxes today so Monday might have a fairly big dollop of the manic within it. And yours? Parsimonious love, Dennis. ** Nick., Hi! It’s me again too! What a coincidence! Oh, shit, I’m glad you’ve put yourself back together successfully. Sorry about the near-murderous interlude. But it’s good to be shaken up or to hence be made to know right from wrong better or something maybe? Did your today hint at anything great? ** Nightcrawler, Her stuff in the 60s and 70s was pretty great, but now she’s a machine. But more power to her, you know. I don’t have AC so even indoors and even with movies as a companion is not the solution, but it’ll be sorted. Warhol’s films are great. I recommend ‘Chelsea Girls’ and ‘Lonesome Cowboys’ as starting places. I didn’t hit that film screening yet, but there are still a few days left to go. Tomorrow, I’m thinking. ** malcolm, Nice about the premiere! Yes, a screener would be most welcome whenever a screener becomes a thing. I have a bad habit, or maybe it’s a time saving device, of never looking for comments on the older posts, but if Alan Boyce possibly commented I will definitely make a beeline backwards. Huh. Annie’s makes vegan Mac & Cheese? Zac is obsessed with Annie’s M&C. Whenever we go to the States, he always brings back, like, ten boxes of it in his suitcase. You can’t buy it here. There’s something in the cheese sauce that’s illegal in France. (?!) Of course I’m a million percent encouraging re: your huge love letter monument to your friend. Might the public get a peek, or is it too personal? Love is good. Wow, is that like the most uninteresting sentence ever? But it’s true. See you soon! ** Today I’m putting all the blog’s eggs in the basket of the pop-expanding painter and novelist Rosalyn Drexler who I thought you should know or at least know exists if you don’t. Be at it, please. Thank you. See you tomorrow.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2024 DC's

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑