The blog of author Dennis Cooper

Month: November 2019 (Page 2 of 13)

Spotlight on … Christine Schutt Pure Hollywood (2018)

 

‘Christine Schutt’s characters tend to be (or be trying to be) at leisure: on holiday, in the garden, by the pool, at the beach, on a horse. Leisure seeks exclusivity; the you-at-leisure wants to be the only you there is, to rope off everything else (work, relationships, mortality). But reality fights back. Part of Schutt’s immense skill is to show her characters in the process of roping-off, whilst making present and felt that which gets left out. Perspectives are limited, but the world beyond their tight boundaries – an anarchic world of wildness and wild fires, of refuse and decay, of ‘gaudy mayhem’, as one character thinks of the ‘muted news [that] flickers on the flat screen’ in her ‘all-purpose islanded kitchen’ – is always present.

‘One result is that events don’t always register as they should. A hurrying description of Mimi’s husband’s death – ‘the ambulance, the body bag, the funeral home, the furnace’ – leads into a discussion of how much the swimming pool he died in might be worth. Later, as though passing through another story, Mimi mistakenly enters a stranger’s house and witnesses an horrific murder: a woman, Dora Wozack, is shot dead by her son. The narrative passes on without comment and when, later, Mimi tries to describe it, it is language, not event, that she gets hung up on: ‘“Dora Wozack said, ‘My son’s troubled,’ or maybe, ‘My son’s trouble.’ It could have been ‘in trouble.’”’ In ‘A Happy Rural Seat…’, a pattern of unregistered event (an unknown something killed in a drink-driving incident; an unanswered phone call; a disturbing news story switched off) culminates in the glancing half-revelation that Pie has been missing for a long time, presumed dead.

‘Disorientation is the collection’s guiding affect. Schutt’s characters are drunk, lost, amnesiac. The grieving poet muddles the seasons: ‘She thought it was summer still if not spring but the day’s evidence said it was fall. Again!’ After Pie’s disappearance, Nick often ‘found himself standing in front of open broom closets and cabinets, in front of the dishwasher and sinks. Sometimes his hands were wet.’ Homes become unheimliche: Mimi is surprised to find her house full of strangers before remembering that its contents are in the process of being auctioned off.

‘The stories themselves are disoriented. In ‘The Hedges’, a superficial, not-coping couple go on holiday with a sick child who falls off a balcony to his death. In telling us this story, Schutt’s narration seems to be always in the dark, playing catch-up, eavesdropping, struggling to read the signs: ‘Sometime in the night… a cry, followed by another, sounded on the hillside. It might have been a sound of pleasure or pained pleasure or something else; the cry was ambiguous.’ Even the sentences are disoriented; information falls in the wrong order, constructions don’t seem to end up where you expect them to.

‘Schutt’s prose is never less than striking. It has a quality of glancing exactness, as though simultaneously looking and not looking: a modern house is ‘shaped like slung plates’, a pair of nuns are ‘wimpled and sudden’. Occasionally, the prose is striking in its (artful) ugliness: a description of dusk in ‘The Hedges’ reflects the couple’s superficial engagement with the world: ‘By then, the sun had set, and the night sky’s show was blinking on quickly. A greater darkness amid the foliage squeaked notes, very pretty.’ Occasionally, it’s incomprehensible: Dora Wozack stands in her kitchen ‘yukking over a quilted jar of vodka’, whatever that means. But the opacity is important. Schutt writes with a coagulate figurative precision. Her prose is somehow crystal clear and opaque, like the thick surface of an oil painting that both figures a world and arrests your attention with its material texture. It looks at and it looks away from and it knows, in its disorientation, that the two are not always so easy to tell apart. To look at the world isn’t always to know it; to look away from it sometimes is.’ — David Isaacs, The White Review

 

___
Further

Christine Schutt
Christine Schutt @ goodreads
A Conversation Between Christine Schutt and Diane Williams
Podcast: Christine Schutt on Bookworm
Correspondence with Christine Schutt
The Crass Class in Christine Schutt’s “Pure Hollywood”
Pure Hollywood – stories to take you out of your comfort zone
ISSUE 4 An Interview with Christine Schutt
Christine Schutt: Learning What You Do Well
Podcast: Between the Covers: Christine Schutt: Pure Hollywood
‘The Blood Jet’, by Christine Schutt
“Remembered Landscapes,” an Interview with Christine Schutt
‘The Dot Sisters’, by Christine Schutt
Uncomfortable Places
Glitz & Infidelity: On Christine Schutt’s ‘Pure Hollywood’
“something else, with it, in the sky”
the garden of earthly delights: christine schutt’s pure hollywood
Atmospheric Disturbances
Hanging Out With Christine Schutt
The Graduate
Matt Bell on Christine Schutt
Buy ‘Pure Hollywood’

 

___
Extras


Christine Schutt’s First Time


Christine Schutt Fiction Craft Lecture


Christine Schutt: The Writers Studio Reading Series

 

____
Interview

 

Michelle Y. Burke: One of the things I admire most about your writing is how it sounds. Your sentences are so rich and lyrical. To what extent are you thinking about sound when you’re writing?

Christine Schutt: I do think about sound. What I want to do is wed sound to scene. What comes first is a picture. I’m thinking of the way my new book, Prosperous Friends, begins. I had this idea that there would be a couple in their mid-thirties outside of London, maybe in the Fens, near a priory or a church. I was remembering my own experience at that age, being in those sorts of churches, and the stones, and the moss on the stones, and the coldness of it. I thought about that a lot, and I thought about what the couple was doing. They’re alone. He wants to surprise her and be sexually risky. I wanted to get a sound that would call up or be right for those stones and that place.

Burke: Is that how you start a new novel or story—an image catches your attention and you find the sound from there?

Schutt: Sometimes there’s an image, yes, and the language comes so fast on it. I look at something for a long time and roll over words right to the occasion.

Burke: Is that also true when you’re creating a character? Does the character come from an imagined scene or image?

Schutt: When I was creating one of the characters in Prosperous Friends, I looked at a postcard picture of Dante Gabriel Rossetti. I bought it at the National Portrait Gallery. Then there was this quality my younger son had when his hair was long, and then there was someone I was making up: a handsome young man with a side-part. I liked this character so well I gave him some success.

Burke: Your story collections are like catalogues of compelling first sentences. The first sentence of “Teachers” in Nightwork—“She told her daughter as she might a love such things her lover said were best kept secret from a girl”—does amazing work at the syntactical level. What do you expect from a good first sentence, and how do you move forward from there?

Schutt: When I was an MFA student at Columbia, I was in class with people who even then were able to tell a story. I could not. What I could do, and what I was praised for doing, was write a great sentence. It was my only pride. When I tried to write a story, I thought what I was good at had to be put aside in favor of advancing the narrative. I would have a nice, rich opening, and then suddenly, I’d think about how I had to move the character across the room. The character had to say something, do something. Dreaded dialogue. I still have to work hard on it. Now I often take out every other line of dialogue. Then it actually sounds like human speech. Then you get something interesting.

Any success I had early on had to do with the fact that people would say, “Wow, you can really write a sentence.” Gordon Lish taught me how to use what I was good at to tell a story.

Burke: Has your writing changed on the sentence level?

Schutt: Yes. I’m not packing every sentence anymore. I’m not indulging that tendency as much. When I was writing Nightwork, I loaded the sentences because I could; I hyphenated a lot to make adjectives, very self-indulgent. I did that to a lesser degree in the second collection of stories, Day and Night. I have been looking for other sources of interest, along with interest in language and finding different ways of getting drama. So, yes, Prosperous Friends is different. I mean, there are descriptions of houses and barns I am proud of. I love dying barns. I love to look at them, but the characters and their movement take precedence; the exchanges between characters are sharper.

I was very confident about Prosperous Friends for a long time. I went around bragging about it, saying this is it, this is the best thing I’ve done. I surprised myself by saying such things. I’m a little superstitious. I thought I should stop bragging. The first time I turned it in, my agent said the novel was too difficult, too elliptical. Who are these people? How old are they? Where are they? The kinds of questions I’ve always been asked.

Then I had a younger reader weigh in on the sexual dysfunctions the book explores. She said, no, these kinds of dysfunctions don’t exist anymore. They’ve gone away. I was devastated when she said that. I thought, my god, they’ve really advanced, but I decided to keep all of the sexual dysfunction in, because they can’t be all cleared up, right? Not for everyone. It really threw me for a loop. Here I was writing about people in their late 30s and 40s, and I suddenly thought that perhaps I really missed the boat. Perhaps young people today are entirely liberated, at ease with their sexuality, and women are having orgasms left and right. In the end, I decided that can’t be the case, but it really caused me to have a crisis of confidence. A real crisis.

I wrote a new beginning to the book at one point. It was very clunky, but it came very easily, and I thought, all right, maybe this is the way to go, but I ended up throwing it out. When I came back from teaching in California, I got rid of it. But I inserted other things, clarifying things, and the book is finished, but I have not felt that initial certainty of its worth.

Burke: Do you think of your work as challenging? Difficult?

Schutt: No, I don’t. I haven’t. That’s why it unsettled me to have what I’d thought was finished returned with questions. My agent said all of the things that people said when I was doing my MFA: The writing is great, but where are we? How old are these characters? In the last draft of Prosperous Friends I changed the chapter titles to place names and the year.

Overall, I don’t think my work is difficult. I don’t write jolly stories, so maybe that’s hard for some readers.

 

___
Book

Christine Schutt Pure Hollywood
Grove Press

‘In one eponymous novella and ten stories, Pure Hollywood brings us into private worlds of corrupt familial love, intimacy, longing, and danger. From an alcoholic widowed actress living in desert seclusion to a young mother whose rejection of her child has terrible consequences, from a newlywed couple who ignore the violent warnings of a painter burned by love to an eerie portrait of erotic obsession, each story is an imagistic snapshot of what it means to live and learn, love and hurt.

‘With Pure Hollywood Christine Schutt gives us sharply suspenseful and masterfully dark interior portraits of ordinary lives, infused with her signature observation and surprise. Timeless, incisive, and precise, these tales are a rush of blood to the head, portals through which we open our eyes and see the world anew.’ — Grove Press

 

____
Excerpt

Oh, the Obvious

Mrs Pall-Meyer, short-waisted, stooped, breasts shrunk to teardrops, Mrs Pall-Meyer was a dirty old woman, no matter she was rich. What good had money done her? She was traveling alone. They were both, Arden Fawn and Mrs Pall-Meyer, traveling alone, but Mrs Pall-Meyer had been at the ranch for over a month and would ride on long after Arden went home: Monday, next week, the first of April, home to an airbrushed county Arden once thought harmless.

Arden yanked at her reins and brought Doc into line while the old woman, Mrs Pall-Meyer, held back her horse and put even more space between them. Mrs Pall-Meyer was as friendless as Arden; no one would miss them.

They rode to the dried-out creek bed that devolved to a trail of ashy sand, charred wood, and trash not pictured in the ranch brochure – a strip of fender, a Pringles can – the rubbly blight of modern life, no green in sight but dust. At least for a time the sound of the horses was peaceable, but the hard floor of the desert came on with a clap. A wizened spring, the sickly prickly pear and organ pipe cacti were so riddled with holes they might have been targets. Even the paloverde trees looked leached. They rode along a level path, fording dried-out riverbeds of chalky stones – pale landscape, white sun. She put on her sunglasses and the view, honeyed, was not so hard on the spirit, but her back still hurt; it felt as if she were tightening a belt of barbed wire around her waist – God almighty, it hurt, and the ride had hardly begun. Arden rode apart not so much by choice as that it happened. Terrain had nothing to do with it. Her horse was slow and she was heavy.

Mrs Pall-Meyer, even farther behind, was a stick and rode as she liked. Now she went at a gentle pace and comfortable distance, for which Arden was grateful. In this way, far enough apart from all of the others, Arden could play on in her pioneering dream of self-sufficiency, even though her favorite part of the ride was when she was off the horse and walking to the ranch. Her legs felt used and wide apart then, and her walk was more a straddle.

‘Kick him!’ Mrs Pall-Meyer cried. The old woman threatened to pass. They had fallen too far behind.

Arden’s horse started to lope then lapsed into a rough trot stopped by the earthy rump of the dentist’s enormous horse.

‘Oh, hoh, my,’ Arden moaned. Knocked against the saddle horn, her pubic bone stung and she pressed her hand between her legs: she felt her own heat and heard Mrs Pall-Meyer spit. Mrs Pall-Meyer had paused, as had all the riders, at the incline.

‘How long have you been riding?’ Mrs Pall-Meyer asked.

‘Oh,’ Arden, said, shifting in the saddle, ‘all my life, but not a lot.’

Mrs Pall-Meyer, the name suggesting a hyphenated importance, merely snorted and rode ahead.

The trail turned narrower, rougher, stonier although the redheaded wrangler – Red, for his hair – might have been asleep, so little did the ride’s danger impress him. How many times had he led folks up this route?

‘Over five thousand acres gives a guy a lot of different ways to go,’ he answered. ‘You’d be surprised.’

Mrs Pall-Meyer said, ‘If I had something to ride on.’ In this way, she simply went on talking to herself, making tough, irritated pickax sounds with words like crap, drink, think. For all the advantages she must have had, Mrs Pall-Meyer was a coarse woman. She had made herself known in the morning, talking at the young Asbach boy, Ben, ‘My friends are dead. My sister is demented. I’m the last of my line, but I bet you’ve got a lot of friends.’ Oh, the nuisance of them all was what the old woman meant to say in her supercilious voice.

Arden had looked on at how Mrs Pall-Meyer befuddled the boy and made him blush. Ben Asbach of the Asbachs – ‘There are eight of us here,’ said the matriarch merrily. A granddaughter – slight as straw – called Mrs Asbach Nana.

What names, if any, had others at the ranch assigned her? – Arden, Arden Fawn. Was she the fat lady, the dull lady, the shy lady – hair color as uncertain as her age? Arden had a pretty face, of this much she was certain, which made it all the sadder, the weight. She hoped for her horse’s sake she would soon reach the summit.

There, Red said they could get off their horses and stretch their legs. But Arden had no intention of stretching her legs. If she got off her horse, she would never get on again. Besides, she could see just as well from on top of her horse, and her back wouldn’t hurt if Doc held still. The riding itself, walking, walking especially and however precariously, was easiest on her back. No loping, please! They rode up the mountain, slowly and close, and her thoughts were the same and body-centered until they all stopped at the summit. The sturdy banker loudly huffed off his horse and landed hard; his wife tiptoed lightly – all grace. And Arden?

‘You sure?’ Red asked, ready to help. ‘I’m fine,’ she said. ‘No, I’ll stay on.’

So Red adjusted her saddle, pulled it more to his side, asked after Doc.

‘He’s a good boy,’ Arden said and wondered was Red a good boy or did he fuck sheep? Arden liked to appall herself with her own appalling thoughts. She liked a little fright in the middle of small exchanges – the selfmanufactured fright from thinking she was overheard. The dentist’s wife, who rode near and behind Red, asked him about the drought with an informed interest in its effects on the region’s wildlife.

Arden regarded the dentist’s wife, talking about water tables. Maybe in some states this was called flirting but the pity of it: a late-life romance as brief as a paper match, a piff of heat but no flame really, a glow quickly extinguished.

The dentist himself winked at Arden. ‘Not going to get off and stretch your legs?’ he asked.

‘Never. I couldn’t. How would I get on again?’ The dentist, smiling, said, ‘There’s lots of ways.’

The dentist was a small man darkly outlined by his specialty, a dentist for expensive and serious procedures to do with reconstruction – think of the bright pan with its sharp slender instruments – she did and was afraid of what this dentist would do inside her mouth. His jeans looked new and his shirt was very white, unwrinkled, snap-buttons, western. She watched him move to a higher point and a different perspective.

Oh, hell, strike the match of romance, who cares if it’s short? Why else had she come to the Double-D? Should she say the weather, the birdlife, the desert in bloom? No one had mentioned a drought. Scant birdlife this season, no color, but hovering just behind Arden was Mrs Pall-Meyer. Mrs Pall-Meyer, an imperious crone with a pointy face that jabbed, Mrs Pall-Meyer stood for something, but for what? Oh, the obvious, death or the future.

There, leaning against a rock and eating ranch granola was the little Asbach girl, rapt with her story’s unspooling. Her lips moved and she smiled to herself, frowned, pouted, then smiled again. Arden guessed she was ten or eleven, a cozy year, fifth grade, but what was her story about? What could she be saying?

Movement now. The others in the group were getting on their horses again. Only Mrs Pall-Meyer did not. She was protesting about her horse.

‘Want some help?’ Red asked.

‘What do you think?’ Mrs Pall-Meyer, with one foot in Red’s hands, said, ‘I hate having to ride a dull horse.’ She tipped a little trying to look at Red as she talked, unsteady, so that he lifted her until she swung her crooked body over the beast she dismissed as a plodder. She didn’t say thank you, just tocked in the saddle to make herself comfortable. It occurred to Arden that Mrs Pall-Meyer might be drunk.

Red took the lead and the party stayed together, the horses picked their way, butt-close, along a ledge. Steep, narrow, white, the ledge was dramatic and Arden held her breath. No one spoke; quiet but for the clocking noise of the horses, their gassy sighs and shivers. Stones popped and the trail noise sounded serious – just as in the cowboy movies: after the shoot-out comes the slow descent, hints of danger and exhaustion. The palomino stumbled and some of the ledge fell away.

‘We are going down, aren’t we?’ Arden asked, anxious.

Mrs Pall-Meyer snorted.

Okay, the question was stupid but the riding was more rocking from side to side than moving forward. Lean back had been the instruction for going downhill, and dutifully Arden did – had – even though the small of her back ached and she was afraid of her horse.

The old woman, suddenly seeming close, sneered, ‘He knows what he’s doing.’

‘I hope so.’

‘You’ve really no business on this ride.’

‘I don’t,’ Arden said. ‘I don’t know,’ she began but she didn’t want to turn around to address the old woman, riding last again. She was tearful enough as it was – her back ached – and to see Mrs Pall-Meyer’s disdain would surely make her cry. She said no more and the repetitive sound of striking hooves stupefied her and when she woke the trail had begun to level off to a more inviting path, soft, quiet, broad. She kicked Doc into a bumpy trot that didn’t last long though it put more space between her and Mrs Pall-Meyer, Mrs Pall-Meyer now far behind until Red shouted out: ‘ Mrs Pall-Meyer!’

Why did he?

But Mrs Pall-Meyer didn’t respond.

‘What can I . . .’ from Red, inconclusive, and so through fluff adrift they rode in a meditative quiet. The banker had spread his life around miles ago. And Red wasn’t much of a talker. Now the stables were in sight. There was the pasture where the ranch horses socialized; there, the barn, the tack room, the ring. The ranch, on a hill, Arden couldn’t see any part of, but the corral was miraculously close.

She barely heard Red say ‘Shit!’ before he jerked his horse around and rode full out to where Mrs PallMeyer was turned upside down. Her foot, twisted, was caught in the stirrup; most of her lay on the ground. Her horse stood still, unmoved by crisis. What sound was this that Mrs Pall-Meyer was making, but it was familiar.

A small truck, its trunk down, banged alongside the fence, stopped at the gate, and another wrangler from another direction came out to herd Arden’s group into the corral. The banker frisked home, and the dentist’s wife and the dentist followed. The Asbachs, grandmother and granddaughter, were already dismounting. ‘Don’t look,’ the grandmother was saying. Arden saw the fluid ten-year shape slide off her horse and canter on her own once her boots hit the ground. Turn away, little girl, turn away from the future, and she did.

 

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** David Ehrenstein, Hi. Well, as a fan of the markedly un-homoerotic, I’ll definitely check it out, ha ha. ** _Black_Acrylic, Hi, B. Ah, thank you for the backstory which has a nice combo of sweetness and nefariousness. ** Steve Erickson, Hey. Well, obviously you can ask the director about that absence, and no doubt he’ll be fully expecting to answer it. If you’re doing any kind of solo homemade Thanksgiving, may it reign. ** sleepyj, Ah, good. Or happy to know you’re also smitten with that stuff while quibbling with nostalgia. Have a good T-day if you’re doing it. ** Well, that was quick. For those in the US, the blog offers you a fine escape from the Thanksgiving festivities today in the form a book by the supreme prose writer/stylist Christine Schutt. And for those of you elsewhere and not on holiday today like me, same deal without the escapism. See you tomorrow.

John Jesurun Day *

* (restored)

 

‘You live in this house. You walk in this street. If you’re going to be in a big space then you have to make it further. Which is interesting to me from the sculptural point of view—to always deal with the space that you’re in. That’s where you are. That’s where everybody else is going to be. So let’s not pretend that we’re someplace else.’ — John Jesurun

‘Director and writer John Jesurun’s presentations integrate elements of language, film, architectural space and media. His exploded narratives cover a wide range of themes and explore the relation of form to content. They challenge the experience of verbal, visual and intangible perceptions. His work is distinguished by his integrated creation of the text, direction, set and media design.

‘Jesurun is adept at playing with the gaps between what we know and what we think we know, and all of the hazy possibilities surrounding the petty certainties to which we cling. He treats his actors like found objects, setting their vocal qualities and idiosyncratic deliveries against his language and allowing for a certain live mayhem to destabilize the finely calibrated text.

‘Jesurun has employed a number of devices heretofore known as cinematic: jump cuts, pans, visual and verbal double tracks, and editing crosscuts of time and place to create multiple time frames. Most dramatically, Jesurun creates the equivalents of camera angles and points-of-view by the positioning of his actors against planar surfaces so that, to the audience, the actors appear overhead, below, or simply hanging in space.

‘Verbal characteristics of Jesurun pieces include verbal double exposures, dislocations via ellipses and non-sequiturs, sheer babble, and the taking of song lyrics (circa 1967-69) such as Hendrix’ “I’m a voodoo chile” to their illogical conclusions.

‘He began presenting theater works in 1982 at the Pyramid Club with his groundbreaking serial play Chang in a Void Moon, now in its 60th episode (“Bessie” Award). Since 1984 he has written, directed and designed over 25 pieces including: the media trilogy of Deep Sleep (1986 Obie), White Water and Black Maria, Number Minus One, Red House, Shatterhand Massacree, Everything That Rises Must Converge, Slight Return, Faust/How I Rose, Septet and Snow.’ — collaged

 

____
Shots


















 

_____
Further

John Jesurun Official Website
John Jesurun interviewed @ Bomb Magazine
Audio: John Jesurun’s ‘Duet’
John Jesurun’s Vimeo Channel
‘Language Makes Itself Come True: An Introduction to John Jesurun
‘Performance as Design: John Jesurun’s Mediaturgy’
Book: John Jesurun’s ‘A Media Trilogy’
John Jesurun Page @ Facebook
John Jesurun @ goodreads

 

____
Extras


Jesurun directed music video for Jeff Buckley’s ‘Last Goodbye’


Jesurun directed music video for Barbez’s ‘Black Forest’


John Jesurun narrates a historical retrospective of his work

 

__________________________________
breaking the relentless spool of film unrolling

by John Jesurun

 

The innocent eye is essentially the pinhole through which one perceives. What the eye focuses on has as much to do with physical as well as mental processes occurring on both sides of it. Both sides are in a constant and sometimes hostile state of educative communication. They are positioned in a line of communication that extends itself within a chain of command struggling to find meaning in itself. The human struggle to get from the inside to the outside and bring the outside to the inside is full of detours, pitfalls and discoveries in interpretation. There is a constant search for the correct translation.

Our original mediators, language, sound, vision, smell, touch, have been compounded by the addition of other mediators in the form of cameras, imitations, reproductions, recordings. In an almost organic way these mediators reproduce themselves at an astonishing speed. As we have discovered new mediators in an effort to understand ourselves, it has made things clearer and more confusing at the same time. The sophisticated and sometimes brutal techniques in which we present and filter information in our ordinary, contemporary reality is certainly an influence on my work.

One of the main concerns in my work is the use of spoken language and its structure. The many levels and layers through which a thought struggles to become words and language constantly reinvigorate communication. Also important to me is the relationship of content to sound and rhythm and how these reflect the impulses of thought and emotion.

In a sense the use of media is one step further away from the brain than the spoken word. But in other ways it seems one step closer because we are capable of making it dissect the very language that set it into motion. It sees and remembers more than our physiology allows our sanity. We can even attempt to catch it and return to its natural internal origins. It is a reflection of the sophisticated techniques our minds use to decipher, edit, reconstruct, contrive and adapt our personal and collective realities. These techniques are primal, (automatic?). We are constantly looking for their origins.

(continued)

 

______________________
13 of John Jesurun’s works

_______________
Chang in a Void Moon (1982 -> )
‘John Jesurun’s legendary “living film serial”, Chang in a Void Moon,the first serialized play ever produced in NY, began in 1982 at the Pyramid Club with Episode #1, won a Bessie in 1985, and has been highly acclaimed through over 58 episodes produced to-date in New york, Munich, Zurich and Berlin.

Chang in a Void Moon laid the groundwork for a style distinguished by integrated creation of text, direction, set and media design. Chang is influenced more by film, television and radio than by theatrical convention. Scenes begin and end abruptly, as if cut and spliced together. Actors are suspended on platforms in various configurations to replicate overhead shots and shots from below. Sailboat races, car crashes and chases, levitating objects-even a decapitation-have all been staged with astonishing aplomb and a decidedly cinematic manner. A captivating intermingling of both contemporary American pop culture and world history, Chang is at once ironic yet oddly sincere. Michael Feingold said of the work, “Chang is an unremitting stream of violent acts offstage and violent verbal assaults on. They’re made light instead of lugubrious by their fantasticated quality, which encourages us simultaneously to fear the infinite power of Chang’s rich, unscrupulous characters, and to laugh at them as part of an outrageous cosmic joke.” The characters of the serial mysteriously exist in a nether region where time is non-linear, events and circumstances erupt without context, and geographic boundaries are meaningless. At times characters appear to live simultaneously in multiple time zones, across many centuries.

‘Don Shewey made the observation that “It’s really theater of language, the actors conjuring it all up with an earnest delivery that is often hilarious in its campy elevated diction. …there is a historical continuum that connects Jesurun’s writing backwards to Richard Foreman and Jim Strahs and forwards to Richard Maxwell.”

‘With Chang, Jesurun has consistently worked with some of New York’s most exciting performers. Over the years his company has featured: Steve Buscemi, Ethyl Eichelberger, Greg Mehrten,John Kelly, Edoardo Ballerini, Tom Murrin, Anna Kohler, Darren Pettie, Black-Eyed Susan, Ching Valdes-Aran, Mark Boone-Junior, David Cale, Frank Maya and the choreographer Neil Greenberg, among others. Many of these performers first came to prominence with their work in Chang, and most of them continue to appear in new episodes.’ — Broadway World

 

_________________
Shatterhand Massacree
(1985)
‘John Jesurun (playwright, director, media artist) began began his theatrical career in 1982 at the Pyramid Club on the Lower East Side with his groundbreaking serial play Chang in a Void Moon, now in its 60th episode.Since then has been a pioneering force in the use of film and video in live performance. His early interest in issues of identity, presence, and communication have been extended over the years to the digital age. As a writer, director, and designer, he has created unique forms of narrative that capture the dislocation and anxiety of contemporary life in real, virtual, and performance spaces. His many works have been performed all over the world, and range from storytelling to classics to computer-based theatre, including Deep Sleep, Shatterhand Massacree, Firefall and Philoktetes.’ — La Mama


Excerpt


Excerpt

 

_________
Black Maria
(1987)
‘Entering La Mama Annex, rearranged to accommodate John Jesurun’s Black Maria, one immediately wonders where the stage is. The seats are facing in all directions and fill the floor space. The fact is there is no stage. With Black Maria, Mr. Jesurun has moved a step beyond Deep Sleep and White Water, the previous plays in his theater-movies-television cycle. This time, the audience is surrounded by movie screens, four of them as walls and one as ceiling. There are no live actors; the ”play” is entirely on film. Soon the screens are overflowing with vivid images – of actors and landscapes, both interior and exterior. As in the earlier plays, the actors speak to one another across the heads of theatergoers. We are thrown into the middle of a mystery, a threatening story that has something to do with a lonely house in the country, a leper colony, an escaped convict and a missing, perhaps dead horse. As a theater artist, Mr. Jesurun forms a graphic composition, and it stands, enigmatically, by itself. We have no idea what his next move will be.’ — NYT


Excerpt

 

__________________________
Everything that Rises Must Converge
(1990)
‘Jesurun’s performances of Everything That Rises Must Converge eviscerate the nervous system. The performance is a control system that lays bare the innerworkings of language and consciousness. This piece was first performed at the Walker Arts Center in Minneapolis and the at the Kitchen in New York in 1990. Mel Gussow, writing in the New York Times, obseved that the language of the play was complex, moving “backwards, forward and sideways”, but “what holds the audience’s attention is the ingenious style of presentation. While we are still trying to correlate the barrage of words and the live video figures, some of whom appear to be taking to themselves, the rear wall suddenly swings to a perpendicualar, revealing an entirely different audience siting on bleachers on the opposites side of the stage. In a mirror reversal, they have been watching our actors on monitors and our monitor-actors on stage.’ — Sun & Moon


Excerpt

 

_________
Slight Return
(1994)
‘John Jesurun’s Slight Return was originally presented at the Randolph St. Gallery in Chicago and La Mama. In this piece the actor is not physically visible by the audience. He is enclosed in a 2 meter by two meter room which sits on the stage. His performance is fed live to five video projection screens. It is more of a live experience than an experienced illusion. Its feelings live in the crack between the deeply located inner voice and the outer world of human communicative experience. The production with its hidden actor and shifting bank of video images has an immaculate stillness suggesting a world of removed but constant observation. The actor explains in an unbroken sometimes delirious monologue that the surrounding city has been leveled and all the government leaders are gone. He appears to be the only survivor, along with a cat, inside a collapsed hotel. His journey unfolds over a hundred floors in an underground world which resembles the interior of a volcano and where direction has no meaning.’ — John Jesurun Site


Excerpt

 

________________
Imperial Motel (Faust)
(1996)
IMPERIAL MOTEL (Faust) is a cross-media performance which encompasses several versions of “Faust”, including a new version written for the company by John Jesurun, as well as many past versions. Set in a motel room surrounded by cameras, the performance revolves around a latter-day American Faust, “wrestling with his demons” in an anonymous, modern space, and a more nostalgic German Faust, recreating and recording older versions of the parable. Through this “live film,” the two Fausts encountered a variety of characterizations of Gretchen, Wagner, and other stock characters.’ — The Builders Association


Excerpt

 

_______________
Chang in a Void Moon, episodes #51-53 (1997)


Excerpt 1


Excerpt 2

 

_____
SNOW
(2000)
‘Like some of his previous multi-media explorations, Jesurun’s Snow has a plot, characters and dialogue but an unorthodox relationship to its spectators. Audience members are seated in a square, walled-off room at the center of a larger performance space designed by Jesurun and scenic collaborator Sally Fredkin. Meanwhile, the cast of Snow (four human beings, and a mobile robotic camera supplemented with a human voice) perform their roles out of immediate sight but close at hand, in a nearby hallway and in adjacent cubicles. Their actions are captured live on video cameras and relayed to the audience via four overhead screens. Since Jesurun’s fable about media run amok in a remote-control world is set in a TV studio, “Snow” is both a deconstruction of media voyeurism and an experience of it. We look on, from up close yet at a remove, as the aging TV movie star Cricket (Valerie Charles) learns she’s a high-tech pawn of the information age and a victim of cyber- stalking.’ — The Seattle Times


Excerpt

 

_____
Septet
(2005)
‘Being in the calibration department for three years since I was 17 has been ….it’ll be hard to leave the calibration department when the purgatorium is finally enacted. We are caught up in deciphering so many meanings behind meanings behind meanings. Did you ever hear about that group, the Beatles? There apparently was a walrus in one of their songs and no one could figure out the meaning of it. Finally the band member Paul admitted he was the walrus. I’’ll have to see if I can get that song and listen to it sometime and find out what it meant. In any case I am not the walrus in this story. Anyway, I….. How do you like your job? That first paycheck is a real rush.’ — Text from ‘Septet’


Excerpt


Excerpt

 

___________
PHILOKTETES
(2005)
‘It’s worth letting the experience of Philoktetes sink in for a while before trying to dissect it — writer-director-designer John Jesurun’s abstract new work takes its name and part of its structure from Sophocles’ drama, but its emotional texture is unique and deserving of some rumination. By turns a meditation on the Greek play, an antiwar jeremiad and an infuriating snarl of almost-penetrable symbolism, Jesurun’s 70 minutes of blank verse are beautifully staged and acted, particularly by lead Louis Cancelmi, though they eventually wander off, aided in their escape by the production’s dim lighting.’ — Variety


Excerpt


Excerpt

 

_____
Firefall
(2009)
FIREFALL exists in several linked dimensions: a central governing website, live performance, altered video stream. In this environment, the cast attempts to maintain a script that keeps breaking down. As seven performers access and contribute live web interventions, the constantly evolving site becomes a character in itself. Multi-tasking “drama” unfolds as the performers and technicians struggle against being consumed by the expanding form they are creating. “Jesurun’s obsession with seeing….and his method of masterminding the audience’s field of vision are the essential keys to the quiet hysteria his work generates.” – Artforum International’ — Dance Theater Workshop


Excerpt

 

______
LIZ ONE
(2009)
‘Black-Eyed Susan plays Elizabeth I of England as revealed through her private diaries. She struggles with a revolving set of presences to disentangle, un-write and finally rewrite her own biography. These intensely reflected histories include her perceptions regarding her five estranged children, their fathers, her own father, her hidden relationship with Buddhism and finally her disastrous attempt to invade North Africa. She inter-reacts with the kaleidoscopic array of ideas and characters through Jesurun’s multi-dimensional use of language and technology. Jesurun and Black-Eyed Susan are long time collaborators having first worked together in Jesurun’s 1984 production of Red House.’ — The Chocolate Factory


Excerpt

 

___________________
Stopped Bridge of Dreams
(2012)
‘John Jesurun’s Stopped Bridge of Dreams unfolds inside an anonymous globe circling jetliner—a modern age pleasure palace—operated by a mother and son.Inspired by 17th Century Japanese writer, Saikaku Ihara’s “‘floating world” stories, Stopped Bridge of Dreams features a variable nightly series of revolving playlets and characters. Jesurun weaves text, video, music and live internet feeds to reflect the anxiety of spiritual and sexual dislocation in contemporary life. Featuring Obie-winning actress Black-Eyed Susan.’ — La Mama


Trailer 1


Trailer 2


Trailer 3

 

______________
Chang in a Void Moon, episodes #59-61 (2014)


Trailer


Excerpts


Excerpt (Episode #61)

 

________________
Fragments From a Triumphal Arch (The Palace at 3am) (2014)
‘With this New York-based artist’s main theme of exploring the rampant technologization of contemporary culture and its effects on consciousness and communication alike, Jesurun’s work challenges one-dimensional interpretations while simultaneously underscoring the processes that constitute our perception. His incessant interplay with various media thereby strikes as the most obvious strategy, with the texts’ pervasive multilingualism a close second, all while generating a sense of mediatised imbrication of the performative event’s combined constituents.’ — Christophe Collard


Performance Timelapse version
—-

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** David Ehrenstein, Hm, interesting re: Gaddis’s camp along the edges. Next time I reread him, I’ll use that radar. Interesting too that you liked ‘Seberg’. I think you’re the first person that hasn’t dissuaded me from it. Okey-doke. ** richard, Hi! Oh, wait, are you Richard as in Labonte? If so, warmest hugs and very happy to see you! If not, my apologies for the presumption, and it’s very nice to meet you. Win-win. ** Steve Erickson, Hi. Well, maybe being the NYT, they’re already seen everything being released before year’s end? I don’t know why I’m trying to give them the benefit of the doubt though. Very, very curious to see that Merce Cunningham 3D doc. Interesting. Well, it’s not like everyone who knows who he is doesn’t already know he was gay. It’s not like it isn’t a given. And I’m pretty sure there are books and definitely writings online that go into his relationships with Cage and Rauschenberg. I seem to be in a ‘benefit of the doubt’ mood today for some reason, ha ha. I hope the Quietus gives you a big yes, obviously. ** _Black_Acrylic, Nice painting. Is it of anyone in particular? I’ll skip ‘The Report’, thanks. Does not look like my kind of thing. ** sleepyj, Hi. Thank you about the post. Oh, you know Bill Jones? Excellent. He’s an old friend of mine although I haven’t seen him in ages. Ah, Xmas lights in the palm trees. That takes me back, being an LA born and raised guy. I’d happily shuttle a fair amount of our nearly nonstop rain to you and yours if I were a deity. I have to say I like Xmas decorations a whole bunch. And that may be partly a nostalgia thing even though I consider nostalgia one of the great enemies. But I do. Do you? Sounds like it. And Paris does Xmas decorations like wild fire, or else it’s a city beautiful enough that the overlay just enhances what one sees daily to the max. You ever been here? I recommend a jaunt. Happy day! ** Bill, Hi, B-ster. The new Swans feedback I’ve heard seems to circle around the idea that it sounds kind of tired or a bit too ‘what one would expect’. I think that’s the gist of what I’ve heard? But I need to find out for myself, duh. We all know these days how hearsay can be a mental laziness generator. I have not seen ‘November’. I’ve heard of it. Hm, it does look tempting. ‘Bonkers bizarro monochromatic folk horror’: sounds like it might the true face of be what ‘The Lighthouse’ tried so crappily to be. Folk Horror is such a thing right now. Interesting. Thanks for the tip, Bill! ** Okay. If you don’t live in or around NYC or maybe Brussels, it’s pretty likely that you don’t know the works of John Jesserun first hand, which is a shame in my book as he’s one of my very favorite makers of theater, a singular and brilliant/brainy auteur of the form. So today I thought I would bring back my old, dead JJ post, newly updated and enhanced a bit, so you can at least know his work exists and dig into some representations  if you so choose. See you tomorrow.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 DC's

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑