‘Sensuous, deeply felt, rigorous, uncompromising – the work of Chick Strand belongs in the canon of avant-garde cinema alongside that of her contemporaries Stan Brakhage and Bruces Baillie and Conner. Thanks to a spate of recent restorations by the Pacific and Academy film archives, they may slowly be getting their due.
‘Co-founder with Baillie of Canyon Cinema in 1961, Strand helped create an audience for experimental filmmakers, which she continued over 24 years as a professor in Los Angeles, bending and expanding minds with the manifold potentials of cinematic form. Her own mastery of poetic abstraction, found footage and lyrical ethnography make her filmography one of the most dynamic and distinctive of an era.
‘A student of anthropology who went on to study ethnographic film, Strand is most often associated with her work documenting the people she encountered in Mexico, in and around the town of San Miguel Allende, Guanajuato. For years she spent her summers there, always with a 16mm camera in hand: Cosas de Mi Vida (1976), Fake Fruit Factory (1986) and Señora con Flores (1995/2011) are only a handful of the many portraits she created before her death in 2009.
‘Many of them focused on the everyday lives of women. The 1970 film Mosori Monika, which considers the relationship between missionaries and native Waraos in Venezuela, exemplifies Strand’s signature style: caressing movements and features in close-up, pulling viewers in by the lapels with a telescoped lens, incorporating the subject’s thoughts via voiceover narration.
‘Perhaps the most radical is Artificial Paradise (1986), an ecstatic rapture of glimpses and textures that dares to express, as she has written, “the anthropologist’s most human desire.” The intimacy of her gaze wants to collapse the distance between filmmaker and subject, outsider and native – in true avant-garde fashion, to recast the document as ‘of’ rather than ‘about’. The result is a relentless, deeply absorbing visual encounter that must be experienced to be understood.
‘Perhaps this unapologetic subjectivity played a part in keeping Strand’s work from embrace within visual anthropology circles – although practitioners like Robert Gardner and John Marshall managed to push notions of the genre from within. (She also felt a strong sense of duty to access and interpret the female experience across cultures, something underrepresented in the male-dominated anthropological work of the early 1970s.) Still, the breadth of Strand’s interests went well beyond ethnography, into film language and experimental technique.
‘When she moved to Los Angeles to study at UCLA, Strand met Pat O’Neill, who encouraged her interest in film stocks and showed her how to solarise film as well as operate an optical printer. Angel Blue Sweet Wings (1966) and Waterfall (1967) are early examples of her experimentation with these tools and techniques. The former is a layered poem of landscape, creatures and natural light with a jazz inflected soundtrack; the latter a deftly synthesised reverie of figure skaters, retriever dogs, church towers and Busby Berkeley mass ornament.
‘Also assembled from appropriated materials are the later works Cartoon le Mousse (1979) and Loose Ends (1979), both decidedly poignant if darker visions of suffering and the human condition. These films succeed in absorbing the viewer into their own universe of keen and unsettling association, dry wit and devastation.
‘The intensity of Strand’s oeuvre finds its breath in films like Kristallnacht and Fever Dream (both 1979), each a sustained meditation on reflected light. But where Kristallnacht hovers over rippling water, with drips and sprays in luminous black and white, Fever Dream insists on the body, all skin and sensuality. They give you the distinct sense of Strand’s voice distilled: the intimacy of physical experience married to light and movement; the essence of vision, the essence of cinema.
‘Describing ethnographic filmmaking, Strand once wrote: “It is a means to get into other perspectives of the culture, to meet them, and to identify with them as fellow human beings.” Her diverse output is permeated by this profound sense of humanity, of film as a tool for identification and relation, transcending time and culture. Strand, who preferred intuition to analysis, would agree: stop reading. See the films.’ — Vera Brunner-Sung, Sight & Sound
___
Stills
___
Further
Chick Strand @ The Film-Makers Cooperative
‘Chick Strand: Loose Notes’
‘U of M Students Respond to Chick Strand: In Retrospect’
‘Divining spirits: Chick Strand’
‘Soft Fiction and Kristallnacht: An Interview with Irina Leimbacher’
‘Chick Strand, Señora con Flores’
‘Tags: Chick Strand’ @ Experimental Cinema
‘Remembering Chick Strand’
‘Chick Strand at 75’
‘Who’s Chick Strand?’
Steve Polta on Chick Strand
‘Forgotten Classics of Yesteryear: Fake Fruit Factory’
‘THE JOY OF AMERICAN AVANT-GARDE’
‘Last Strand’
‘Chick Strand: Now They Call it “Avant-Garde”‘
‘Goodbye, Chick Strand’
___
Extras
CHICK STRAND DOCUMENT
“Marmor”, a found footage video using film material of Chick Strand
_____
Audio Interview 2008.02.25
____
Quotes
“I have no idea what my films mean when I’m doing them. That is boring to me to figure out…If I knew what the meaning was, there would be no reason to do it.”
“Other people love to work with a script and the whole thing but not me…”
“[Soft Fiction] is a film about women who win…What I mean by winning is that they don’t become victims, and they don’t become survivors. They carry on. They take the responsibility for having had the experience and carrying it off and dealing with it and carrying on and becoming more potent, more powerful, more of themselves.”
“The end one, Hedy, means it is never trivial. It is all going to get us in the heart and the gut. She just comes to a blank when she gets to that hill where bad things are going on. She gets to a blank. She’s had a hard time, obviously. And that was the first time that she told the story to anyone….in a sense the film itself acted as an exorcism for some of these things. These stories are what the women told me….”
“I make films. I don’t make films for a living. It’s out of pocket most of the time. And I damn well do what I want. I have no responsibility to the Women’s movement, to liberal politics, to international workers of the world, or to anything or to any political correctness, none at all. I’d be bored. It’s all going to come out. Let the people speak for themselves, the incidents speak for themselves. When I first started showing Soft Fiction, I’d get shit from some feminists as if I wasn’t supposed to show it—as if I was supposed to lie about it somehow.”
“All of us experimental filmmakers are in the hole—the guys and the women, too. We’re the last anybody ever thinks about and the first to go. But then our own boys don’t pay any attention to us. Well, they do but…that’s pretty hard. But that’s okay, because the biggest hole is experimental film…We’re all in it as experimental filmmakers. So that’s the part of me that ends up going to these shows and speaking—just in case one or two people might be interested enough to pay the fee to get in and keep things going.”
“I shoot documentary style…And Soft Fiction, no. I don’t know to this day whether one person’s story is true or not. I mean, it has to do with memory. I am much more interested in how it is related to Alain Resnais—to Last Year at Marienbad (1961)—than I am interested in whether it is related to Salesman (Albert and David Maysles, 1969).”
“I like a lot of movement. I like to make my own special effects. I like to put the viewer in a position they would never be in: really close in, for a length of time, like they’re flitting around the feet of the dancers.””
______________
10 of Chick Strand’s 18 films
______________
Anselmo (1967)
‘Strand spent over twenty years documenting her friend Anselmo Aguascalientes’ life, eventually creating a stunning trilogy of films—Anselmo, Cosas de mi vida, and Anselmo and the Women—tender portraits that are also glimpses into poverty, resourcefulness, perseverance and patriarchy.’ — letterboxd
______________
Mosori Monika (1970)
‘ Mosori Monika considers the relationship between missionaries and native Waraos in Venezuela, exemplifies Strand’s signature style: caressing movements and features in close-up, pulling viewers in by the lapels with a telescoped lens, incorporating the subject’s thoughts via voiceover narration.’ — bfi
______________
Elasticity (1975)
‘Impressionistic surrealism in three acts. The approach is literary experimental with optical effects. There are three mental states that are interesting: amnesia, euphoria and ecstasy. Amnesia is not knowing who you are and wanting desperately to know. I call this the White Night. Euphoria is not knowing who you are and not caring. This is the Dream of Meditation. Ecstasy is knowing exactly who you are and still not caring. I call this the Memory of the Future.’ — C.S.
the entire film
______________
Cosas de mi vida (1976)
‘Expressive documentary in an ethnographic approach about Anselmo, a Mexican Indian. It is a film about his struggle for survival in the Third World. Orphaned at age 7, he was the sole support of himself and his baby sister, who eventually starved and died in his arms. The film continues with Anselmo’s struggle to live and to do something with his life other than a docile acceptance of poverty. Totally uneducated in a formal way, he taught himself how to play a horn and when he became a man he started his own street band. The film was started in 1965 and finished in 1975. During the 10 years, I saw the physical change in Anselmo’s life in terms of things he could buy to make his family at first able to survive, and during the last years, to make them more comfortable. I felt a change in his spirit from a proud, individualistic and graceful man into one obsessed with possessions and role playing in order to get ahead and stay on top, but one cannot help but admire his energy and determination to succeed, to drag himself and is family out of the hopelessness and sameness of poverty to give them a future. Anselmo tells his own story in English although he does not speak the language. After he told me of his life in Spanish, I translated it into English and taught him how to say it.’ — C.S.
______________
Loose Ends (1979)
‘LOOSE ENDS is a collage film about the process of internalizing the information that bombards us through a combination of personal experience and media in all forms. Speeding through our senses in ever-increasing numbers and complicated mixtures of fantasy, dream and reality from both outside and in, these fragmented images of life, sometimes shared by all, sometimes isolated and obscure, but with common threads, lead us to a state of psychological entropy tending toward a uniform inertness … an insensitive uninvolvement in the human condition and our own humanity.’ — Filmmakers Coop
the entire film
______________
Soft Fiction (1979)
‘Chick Strand’s SOFT FICTION is a personal documentary that brilliantly portrays the survival power of female sensuality. It combines the documentary approach with a sensuous lyrical expressionism. Strand focuses her camera on people talking about their own experience, capturing subtle nuances in facial expressions and gestures that are rarely seen in cinema.’ — collaged
the entire film
Irina Leimbacher talks about “Soft Fiction”
_____________
Kristallnacht (1979)
‘”Kristallnacht” is so abstract that any connection to the Holocaust beyond the film’s title and dedication can be seen as deeply seeded if not entirely non-existent. I don’t consider that a complaint even if it sounds that way. If anything, this is less about the images evoking meaning on the surface and more about the context deciding the meaning of its images. Light on water, silhouettes of faces, a naturalistic mostly environmental score – so so minimal, yet placed underneath the inescapable implication of death.’ — Puffin
_____________
Fake Fruit Factory (1986)
‘ I discovered this particular piece after it being mentioned as one of the National Film Registry’s 2011 list of 25 culturally significant films. Before actually viewing the film I was surprised by its inclusion given that it is only a twenty minute documentary about a group of Mexican women making fake fruit. Upon beginning my viewing of the film though I realized it was something far grander and more realized than simply documenting an unusual type of employment. What Chick Strand creates in her brief documentary is an ethereal study of human existence as seen through the lives of a few under-appreciated and blatantly exploited women. Unlike other fly on the wall documentaries, Strand offers you no explanation as to what you are watching besides an occasional title card of explanation, you are left to glean from the film what is shown and what is said by the works, most of which is referencing the sexual exploits of the women. This approach makes considerable sense given Strand’s close ties to the ethnography program that existed at UCLA in the 1970’s. What Fake Fruit Factory becomes through Strand’s vision is a concise narrative essay on a few women who are being exploited by an often faceless white man, who only desires their craftiness and, at times, exotic bodies. We as viewers fear the worst when we realize that there is little these women can do to escape, until we are shown the women enjoying a picnic and swimming at an unknown park. This brief moment reminds viewers that life is not about the products we create or those things we can quantify, but instead the always fleeting moments of quality which toss and turn like agitated waters. Chick Strand offers something different and proves how integral experimentation in film has become to the grander evolution of cinema.’ — Travis Wagner
Excerpt
the entire film
_______________
Coming Up for Air (1986)
‘A “new narrative” film based on the visions of magic realism in an Anglo context. This is a gothic mystery that explores a reckless pursuit of interchangeable personalities and experience. Whether experience is first hand, read, remembered from a conversation during a chance encounter, heard of from all possible sources of information, whether fact or fiction, the “experiences” become ours; reinterpreted, reconstructed, and restructured, finally becoming our personal myths, and the source of our poetry and dreams. The sources for this film include night dreams, the idea of holocaust, the exoticness of the Mid-East, the sensuality of animals, the explorations of Scott in Antarctica, and a film I once saw, entitled The Son of Amir Is Dead.’ — Chick Strand
the entire film
_______________
Wild Rumpus (2008)
‘A pastiche by Chick Strand built out of footage from Where the Wild Things Are.’ — dustincollins
the entire film
*
p.s. Hey. ** _Black_Acrylic, Hi, B. Black Metal is very stylin’. Eek, I had measles as an adult when I was living in Amsterdam, and it was really rough. It took my immune system more than a year to work properly again. Avoid the possibility at all costs. ** Darby𓃱𓃱$$$, Giddy, sweet. ‘Freak Toons’, no, I don’t, but I will check with my most zine-savvy associates and pursue post-haste. If I find it, you’ll know. Thanks! Awesome about your New Year! Thank you about the mouse. I saw it just in the nick of time. ** jay, HNY to you! Gosh, maybe I’ll actually give celebrating the change of years a shot, but I don’t like drinking, and I’m basically post-druggie, so it might be a real challenge. It’s very rare that studio porn these days isn’t just boxy and old fashioned. A dying breed, I think. I’m one of those persons who can’t watch or read or listen to anything, even porn, without immediately deconstructing it formally and trying to figure out how it works, or, in porn’s case, putting aside its cast members and assessing how it gave me a boner our didn’t. I think they call people like me geeks. How nice that the slaves post did extracurricular duty, and successfully. Thanks for passing that along. Good luck making your New Years fun a mere twinkle in your year’s eye. Eye? Or something. ** Steeqhen, I never remember my dreams so I’m envying the clarity and narrative properties of yours. 30 is wholly doable. I don’t know how many books I read yearly, but it’s quite a bunch. For me, yoga worked pretty well, if memory serves, but not well enough. That said, I don’t remember anything about doing it what that felt like. So, who knows. Much luck on the throat/cough upswinging. ** Dominik, Hi!!! You’re back!!! Good, good that you only had 8.5 lousy hours since we last spoke. My holidays were very lowkey, Kind of a blur. This year has started without an untoward incident thus far. Black Metal can be very good at kind of scrubbing you out, clearing the mental decks and all of that. Like a deep cleaning. Thank you putting my thing on your list of favorite things! Your thing was on my list of favorite things too. Fist bump. Love’s not a girl who misses much, G. ** James, Ridiculous, poorly recorded things are a problem? Since when? HNY to you! There is quite a lot of grunt work involved in finding slaves who are interesting/ amusing/ tragic enough to present to you all, so I’ll accept a smidgen of your compliment, thank you. No, I think you have to write that Burroughsian novel, as far as I can tell. Ultimately, as something of a news junkie, not to mention a devourer of every fact-based tidbit about my various obsessions, I definitely read more non-fiction than fiction, but when non-fiction is in a book, I do fight off feeling like ‘Get that rabble out of the sacred object!’. You’re lucky to have the brother you have, trust me. That guy you chatted with sounds like a total warning sign. Glad he couldn’t keep himself from warning you. Luck with the short story. Nose to the grindstone, as they say, and whatever the hell that means. ** Cletus, HNY to you and yours! Cool. I once tried to interview a Black Metal musician as part of my research for the text portion of a theater piece Gisele Vienne were making, but every time I asked him a question he just glowered at me and rolled his eyes, so that didn’t help. Or, well, it did, I guess. ** Misanthrope, Well, next time, man. There’s always a next time. Ugh, re: David’s state. I think you have to cut him off. He’ll probably lose his shit, but he needs to lose his shit. Man, so much luck to you on that. Poor David. I so really hope he gets his shit together. ** Tyler Ookami, Hi. I did do an early search on the furry bands/music, and it does look pretty healthy and interesting. I’m just waiting to see if it’s enough to make a blog post about at the moment. Thanks! ** Steve, In my experience of late, most of the people I’ve met who are big readers of fiction and/or poetry have either been female, trans, or young queer guys. I have to wait for the venue hosting the premiere to announce before I can. I’m not sure when that will be. I don’t believe the venue has a competition. It’s an exciting, logistically smaller, relatively new festival. ** Steven Purtill, Hey, man! I’m glad you saw that I re-upped it! It’s still fresh as a daisy. HNY to you! I hope everything in your world is progressing greatly! ** HaRpEr, The Schuyler novel is really lovely. Very him. Calder is so great. There was a time when every book I read was either a Calder or Grove book. Did you ever get caught shoplifting? I did twice, but I was still young enough at the time, maybe 13 or 14, that my crocodile tears got me scoldings and not the cops. As a thrower of myself into work type of person, I don’t need to tell you which side of that argument I’m on. Throw. ** Dev, Hi. It does feel like the Cloudflare monster is weakening, but I don’t know if that’s technically true. Anyway, hey! Thanks for knocking twice. FUMES by Miccaeli: cool, I just bookmarked it. I do sorely need to enter the minds of people who think complexly about smells. ’19-69′ … I do know what cocaine smells like, I’ll try to find it and give it a whirl. Thanks, pal. I’m guessing Oxford, MS was named after Oxford, UK and now I am wondering why. Nothing against non-fiction at all, at least from me. I do think it’s interesting that most readers would rather have factual material to use their imaginations on rather than pre-imagined non-truthful writing to build upon. Wow, yeah, our birthdays are next door neighbors! Thats crazy. Uh, I want to go to my favorite amusement park Efteling, but I won’t be going on my actual birthday. I’m not sure what I’ll do. Traditionally my friends and I always went to the Hard Rock Cafe to eat nachos, but Hard Rock Cafe shut down permanently last month, so I’m a bit lost. You’ll be studying so hard you can’t even go outdoor a birthday dinner on your big day?! Hats off to your dutifulness, man. Well, at least eat something completely amazing on Friday. ** Justin D, Hey, JD. Oh, wow, choosing a favorite GbV song is very, very, very hard given their endless supply of song masterpieces. At one point I decided that ‘Red Men and Their Wives’ was my favorite by them, so it’s possible it still would be, but don’t hold me to that. What’s yours? Every day I curse the forces that do not allow us in France to access The Criterion Channel. My first day of 2025 was okay. I saw a visiting friend. I progressed in my video game. The price of cigarettes went up one euro per pack and that wasn’t so great. That’s kind if it. How was your second day of 2025? ** Okay. Today I present to you the work of another very interesting filmmaker that you may not be familiar with due to the ridiculous conservatism of current day film critics and distributors and streaming platforms. So, in that sense, today is a possibly rare opportunity to say, ‘Fuck the boring, mainstream self-appointed culture-arbitrating powers that be, I’m going to discover films based on their uniqueness and daring, and here’s one of my chances.’ Or you could just scroll down rapidly. It’s a free country. It’s all good. Maybe. See you tomorrow.