The blog of author Dennis Cooper

Category: Uncategorized (Page 265 of 1086)

Tim Callum presents … 18 anomalies of British Rock (1971 – 1981)

 

If we ever meet, you might notice my hand slip down the back of my trousers to caress my buttocks. I also have a habit of going off at inappropriate tangents during conversation and am borderline obsessive about my chickens and their laying schedule, even though I haven’t eaten an egg for over ten years. Odd, you might think, but as far as eccentric behaviour goes all this is so mild as to barely register.

Eccentricity. We all know it when we see it. Chances are high some of you reading this are eccentric, and we British are quietly proud to lead the world in producing Grade-A loons.Yet there has been astonishingly little clinical research into the subject to date, probably because eccentrics tend to be cheerful souls who rarely seek treatment. Counterintuitively, for many assume that eccentricity is one short step from serious mental disorder, studies of eccentricity show that eccentrics suffer less from mental illnesses such as depression than the majority of the population.

In 1859, the anti-slavery campaigner, women’s rights advocate and Liberal MP John Stuart Mill wrote in On Liberty, “That so few now dare to be eccentric, marks the chief danger of the time.” A man who hated any kind of tyranny, Mill particularly despised the sneering, curtain-twitching, self-elected arbiters of social conformity. For him, they were tyrants responsible for “enslaving the soul.” Instead, Mill saw eccentric behaviour – so long as it harmed no-one – as not only a matter of personal freedom, but a boon to society.

Sir Isaac Newton once stuck a large needle into his eye socket and twiddled it around, apparently for the sheer wanton hell of it, while Einstein always filled his pipe with tobacco from cigarette butts he found in the street. The naturalist Reverend William Buckland famously attempted to eat his way through the entire animal kingdom (he reported that moles and bluebottles taste vile, should you ever be tempted by a tasting menu). Realising that it was one of the few things he hadn’t eaten, the Rev is also said, on a whim, to have gobbled down the preserved heart of King Louis XIV.

Eccentrics are the people who see problems from new and unexpected angles; whose very oddity allows them to conjure innovative solutions. They are the visionaries who make giant imaginative leaps. It’s been suggested that, like the occasional mutations that drive evolution, eccentrics may provide the unusual, untried ideas that allow human societies to progress. Be proud of your eccentricity and always remember that while there will be those who disapprove, you don’t have a problem – they do. You are doing yourself, and the rest of us, a favour. The mockers have nothing to offer but a social straitjacket.

 

Kevin Ayers
Dagmar Krause
Arthur Brown
Vivian Stanshall
Roy Wood
Robert Wyatt
John Cale
Julian Cope
Scott Walker
Ivor Cutler
Syd Barrett
Simon Fisher Turner
Robyn Hitchcock
Nick Lowe
Neil Innes
Alex Harvey
Roger Chapman
Billy Childish

 

_________
Kevin Ayers
‘Oleh Oleh Bandu Bandong’
Joy of a Toy is the debut solo album of Kevin Ayers, a founding member of Soft Machine. Its whimsical and unique vision is a clear indication of how Soft Machine might have progressed under Ayers’ tenure. After a Soft Machine tour of the USA with the Jimi Hendrix Experience, Ayers had decided to retire from the music business. Hendrix however, presented Ayers with an acoustic Gibson J-200 guitar on the promise that he continue his songwriting. It was on Joy Of A Toy that Ayers developed his sonorous vocal delivery, an avant-garde song construction and an affection for bizarre instrumentation that would have a deep influence far into the 1970s and indeed the present day.’ — collaged

 

_________
Dagmar Kraus
‘Bad Alchemy’
‘Slapp Happy is the most favorite band of mine. Finally, I start writing about them. I could not write about them until now because I was anxious if I can write well. (My love for them is so strong!) Slapp Happy is made of three persons. No one can substitute members. They are Dagmar Krause, Anthony Moore, and Peter Blegvad. Some of their songs remind me strongly of Kurt Weill. Particularly, “Some Question About Hats”, “A Worm Is at Work”, “Bad Alchemy”, “Apes in Capes” are very Weillian. Also, there is some influence of Carla Bley/Michael Mantler music. Very acrobatic, circus-like, Berlin Cabaret-like music with a taste of avant-garde jazz. Ahhh, it was more than 20 years ago. And I am still listening to them with the same excitement and astonishme
nt like the time when I first heard it.’
— Airstructures

 

_____________
Arthur Brown ‘Galactic Zoo’
‘Arthur Brown. How many of you just visualised him singing his hit song Fire on TV with his head on fire? And there is the blessing and curse that Arthur has had to carry the whole of his career – that song was so ubiquitous, and the visual image so striking, that it has become his very own Freebird or Stairway To Heaven, only magnified by a large factor owing to his continued lack of any real commercial success in the decades since. When the Crazy World collapsed in something of a heap in 1969, Arthur cast around for another line-up of suitable musicians, finally assembling the first line-up of Kingdom Come. The band secured a deal with Polydor Records on the strength of a jam recording which impressed the label, and the band were set to record the first Kingdom Come album. Having got the contract, Arthur then promptly replaced the entire band. All of them. Nevertheless, the new line-up which was recruited turned out to be more than up to the task, and recorded the fascinating album The Galactic Zoo Dossier, which was unleashed on an unsuspecting world in 1971. The unsuspecting world ignored it, which in truth is hardly a great surprise, but in fact the album is far from the ‘explosion in a psychiatric ward’ that some claim it to be.’ — Velvet Thunder

 

____________
Vivian Stanshall
‘The Beasht Inside’
‘Vivian Stanshall was an English singer-songwriter, painter, musician, author, poet and wit, best known for his work with the Bonzo Dog Doo-Dah Band, for his surreal exploration of the British upper classes in Sir Henry at Rawlinson End, and for narrating Mike Oldfield’s Tubular Bells. Stanshall was often called a “great British eccentric”, but this was a label he hated: it suggested that he was putting on an act. Instead, as he himself always insisted, “…he was merely being himself.” However, it is not difficult to understand why he received the label. Neil Innes said of their first meeting: “He was quite plump in those days. He had on Billy Bunter check trousers, a Victorian frock coat, violet pince-nez glasses, and carried a euphonium. He also wore large pink rubber ears.”‘ — collaged

 

_______
Roy Wood
‘Meet Me at the Jailhouse’
‘Roy Wood was particularly successful in the 1960s and 1970s as member and co-founder of the bands The Move, Electric Light Orchestra, and Wizzard. He was and remains keen on musical experimentation and was in this respect one of the most progressive musicians of his time, taking the ‘pop group’ into new areas. He was an early proponent of combining rock and roll and pop music with other styles, such as classical music, or the big band sound, and introduced classically-styled string and brass sections into the pop record. His 1973 album Boulders was an almost entirely solo effort, right down to the sleeve artwork, with Wood playing a wide variety of musical instruments.’ — collaged

 

_________
Robert Wyatt
‘Muddy (c) Wich Leads to Muddy Mouth’
‘An enduring figure who came to prominence in the early days of the English art rock scene, Robert Wyatt has produced a significant body of work, both as the original drummer for art rockers Soft Machine and as a radical political singer/songwriter. Born in Bristol, England, Wyatt came to Soft Machine during the exciting, slightly post-psychedelic Canterbury Scene of the mid-’60s that produced bands like Gong and Pink Floyd. Soft Machine eschewed bloated theatrical excess, preferring a standard rock format that interpolated jazz riffing, extended soloing, and some forays into experimental noise.His solo career was built less around his abilities as a percussionist and more around his frail tenor voice, capable of breaking hearts with its falsetto range.’ — allmusic

 

_______
John Cale
‘My Maria’
‘John Cale’s trilogy of albums of the mid-70s – Fear, Slow Dazzle, and Helen of Troy – were recorded with other Island artists including Phil Manzanera and Brian Eno of Roxy Music, and Chris Spedding, who featured in his live band. This era of Cale’s music is perhaps best represented by his somewhat disturbing cover of Elvis Presley’s iconic “Heartbreak Hotel”, and by his frothing performance on “Leaving It Up To You”, a savage indictment of the mass media first released on Helen of Troy, but quickly deleted from later editions of the record due perhaps to the song’s pointed Sharon Tate reference. Both “Leaving It Up To You” and “Fear Is A Man’s Best Friend” (from Fear) begin as relatively conventional songs that gradually grow more paranoid in tone before breaking down into what critic Dave Thompson calls “a morass of discordance and screaming”.’ — Wikipedia

 

_________________
Julian Cope
‘Strange House in the Snow’
‘Along with other contemporary Liverpudlian groups, The Teardrop Explodes played a role in returning psychedelic elements to mainstream British rock and pop, initially favouring a lightly psychedelic West Coast beat-group sound (sometimes described as “bubblegum trance”) and later exploring more experimental areas. In addition to their musical reputation, the band (and Cope in particular) had a reputation for eccentric pronouncements and behaviour, sometimes verging on the self-destructive. During the recording of their second album, the previously drug-free Cope was introduced to both cannabis and LSD. This would ensure that a band which had previously had a strong interest only in the stylings and theory of psychedelic rock soon began living the psychedelic lifestyle and perspective in earnest.’ — mmmm.eclipse.co.uk

 

_________
Scott Walker
‘Copenhagen’
‘In 1968 Scott Walker threw himself into intense study of contemporary and classical music, which included a sojourn in Quarr Abbey, a monastery on the Isle of Wight, to study Gregorian chant. His own songs gradually coursed into Lieder and classical musical modes. Scott Walker’s early solo career was successful in Britain; his first three albums, titled Scott, Scott 2 and Scott 3, all sold in large numbers, Scott 2 topping the British charts. There were also early indications that this concentrated attention was not conducive to Walker’s emotional well-being. He became reclusive and somewhat distanced from his audience. During this time, he combined his earlier teen appeal with a darker, more idiosyncratic approach that had been hinted at in songs previously.’ — collaged

 

________
Ivor Cutler
‘Go and Sit Upon the Grass’
‘He’s an amazing lothario and a true person-devourer.. He is easily bored. Boring Ivor Cutler is like placing your hand on a burning hotplate. It’s very painful. What’s more, he considers it criminal. The whole of Ivor Cutler’s life is like a children’s picnic. He has a fantastic selection of silly hats which he’ll answer the door in. Usually, if you visit, as he moves around, an odd chirruping sound will emerge from the creases in his clothing. He carries a small bird-sound device in his pocket. As it twitters, his face is always as straight as a ruler. Curiously enough, Ivor is reputedly one of Johnny Rotten’s heroes. That seems appropriate. He’s a perpetual rebel. In many ways he’s a man ahead of his time.’ — Nicola Barker

 

________
Syd Barrett
‘If It’s in You’
‘Besides being a pioneer in psychedelic rock with his expressive guitar playing and imaginative compositions, Barrett was also a pioneer in the space rock and psychedelic folk genres. He was active in music for only about seven years, recording four singles, the debut album (and contributed to the second one), plus several unreleased songs with Pink Floyd; and a single and two albums (plus a third one of unreleased tracks/alternate takes), as a solo musician, before going into self-imposed seclusion lasting more than thirty years. Most of the compositions on Barrett’s solo albums date from his most productive period of songwriting, late 1966 to mid-1967, and it is believed that he wrote few new songs after he left Pink Floyd.’ — collaged

 

_______________
Simon Fisher Turner
‘Love Around’
‘Simon Turner rose to fame as an offbeat teen star in Britain in the early 1970s. His work quickly turned experimental, ending his teen idol fame abruptly. He has since used several names as a recording artist, including Simon Fisher Turner, The King of Luxembourg, Deux Filles and Simon Turner. Simon Turner continues to record albums for Mute Records as Simon Fisher-Turner.If there’s a location for Fisher Turner’s work it might be somewhere near the zone defined by renowned trumpet player John Hassell as the Fourth World – a place where cultures and techniques mix without compromise. To include Fisher Turner, however, the borders would have to be open enough to accommodate The Aphex Twin, Terry Riley, Black Dog, John Lydon, Howie B, Harold Budd, Miles Davis, The Prodigy, Eno and a restless host of cor anglais wielders and teletext machine tapers.’ — collaged

 

__________
Robyn Hitchcock
‘Leppo and the Jooves’
‘Formed in Cambridge, England in 1976 on the heels of the punk revolution, the Soft Boys eschewed the three-chord nihilism of punk and opted for a crude version of psychedelic/folk-rock that was well on its way out of fashion, but oddly, just on the cusp of a resurgence. Their LP Underwater Moonlight has become extremely influential in the guitar rock canon — the Replacements, R.E.M., and the L.A. Paisley Underground scene all claimed it as a prime influence. The album launched a thousand bands, but it turned out to be the Soft Boys’ swan song. Band member Robyn Hitchcock has had a prolific post-Soft Boys recording career, sticking to the unusual style he’s forged and finessed since 1976.’ — allmusic

 

________
Nick Lowe
‘Marie Provost’
‘Nick Lowe’s first and most influential album Jesus of Cool has a number of tracks attacking the commercialism and greed of the record industry and the shallow content of pop music: “Music for Money”, the fraternal twin songs “Shake and Pop” and “They Called It Rock”, and “Rollers Show”; the last being a parody of the teen audience of the Bay City Rollers. Although musically sophisticated in conventional genres, the album shares the energy, cynicism and rebelliousness of the contemporary New Wave movement. Lowe was concerned with bringing back the tradition of three-minute pop singles and hard-driving rock & roll, but he subverted his melodic songcraft with a nasty sense of humor. His records overflowed with hooks, bizarre jokes, and an infectious energy that found them a devoted cult audience and were often critically praised.’ — collaged

 

_______
Neil Innes
‘Them’
‘Neil Innes is that rarity among musical comedians, a side-splitting satirist who can also write perfectly straightforward, catchy pop songs. He’s best known for his collaborative work with Monty Python, for playing in the legendary Bonzo Dog Doo-Dah Band, for a series of unpredictable solo albums, and for writing the music for and performing in The Rutles. The Rutles songs so cleverly parodied the original source material that he was taken to court by the owners of The Beatles’ catalogue. Innes had to testify under oath that he had not listened to the songs at all while composing The Rutles songs, but had created them completely originally based on what he remembered various songs by The Beatles sounding like at different times. Ironically, Innes himself would go on to sue heavily Beatles-influenced band Oasis over their 1994 song “Whatever”, as it directly lifted parts of its melody from Innes’s 1973 song “How Sweet to Be an Idiot”.’ — collaged

 

___________
Alex Harvey
‘Sgt. Fury’
‘Alex Harvey was a Scottish rock and roll recording artist. With his Sensational Alex Harvey Band, he built a strong reputation as a live performer during the 1970s glam rock era. The band was renowned for its eclecticism and energetic live performance, Harvey for his charismatic persona and daredevil stage antics. It was simplicity itself: theatre and music, performance and attitude. SAHB really put on a show, creating larger-than-life characters and 3-D images with a fake wall, a can of spraypaint, a lamp post and old mac Harvey bought for 50p in an Oxfam shop. The band split up in 1978, and Alex continued with a solo career, but was never able to recreate the success of SAHB.’ — collaged

 

_______
Roger Chapman
‘Drowned in Wine’
‘Family’s sound was distinguished by several factors. The vocals of Roger Chapman, described as a “bleating vibrato” and an “electric goat”, are among the most unique and polarizing in rock history. John “Charlie” Whitney was an accomplished and innovative guitarist, and Family’s sing arrangements were often extraordinarily complex. The band’s sound has been variously described as progressive rock, psychedelic rock, acid rock, folk rock, jazz fusion. Family were particularly known for their live performances; one reviewer describing the band as “as one of the wildest, most innovative groups of the underground rock scene”, noting that they produced “some of the rawest, most intense performances on stage in rock history” and “that the Jimi Hendrix Experience were afraid to follow them at festivals”.’ — collaged

 

____________
Billy Childish ‘Fun in the UK’
‘A cult figure in America, Europe and Japan, Billy Childish is by far the most prolific painter, poet, and song-writer of his generation. In a twenty year period he has published 30 collections of his poetry, recorded over 70 full-length independent LP’s and produced over 1000 paintings. Born in 1959 in Chatham, Kent. Billy Childish left Secondary education at 16 an undiagnosed dyslexic. Refused an interview at the local art school he entered the Naval Dockyard at Chatham as an apprentice stonemason. During the following six months (the artist’s only prolonged period of employment), he produced some six hundred drawings in ‘the tea huts of hell. On the basis of this work he was accepted into St Martin’s School of Art to study painting. However, his acceptance was short-lived and before completing the course he was expelled for his outspokenness and unorthodox working methods.’ — Hamper87


—-

 

*

p.s. Hey. Today a non-commenting reader of this blog has kindly made this lovely post about 70s Brit rock oddballs for your delectation. It was a colorful time when rock was experiencing particularly fruitful growing pains, and here’s the proof. Please enjoy Tim Callum’s generous gift and spare a word or several for him in appreciation if you don’t mind. Thanks, and thanks a billion, Tim. ** Misanthrope, Sorry about the hella boring. Maybe it was better than frantic, but maybe not. Rock the busy. ** David Ehrenstein, Oh, I certainly think it has a future. There are exciting films being made all the time. The only problem is that it’s getting harder and harder to find out about them much less see them. ** _Black_Acrylic, Hm, I suspect you’d remember ‘Malgre …’ but find out. Wow, strange about the 49s buying Leeds. I’m absolutely no fan of American football, but I presume they do have the dough to buy you a top notch team? ** tomk, Hi! What is your time being swallowed by? Getting any writing in? I liked the Goldin doc. It gets a lot done/said in an economical time. What did you think? ** Steve Erickson, Yes, your yellowed skies are big international news. Lots of End of the World rhetoric. I think Grandrieux’s films’ poetics and singularity are pretty US unfriendly. Not to say he’s a household name here even. ** Cody Goodnight, Hi. I’m good. I wish I’d gotten a little more sleep last night, but hey. I agree that ‘Haute Tension’s’ ending is a real let down. If you want to see a Grandrieux where’s at his most ‘Extremity’, probably ‘Malgré la nuit’. It’s an imperfect film, but it has amazing things in it. Or maybe ‘Sombre’, which I think is ultimately a more consistently excellent film. I have an intrusive thoughts issue too, high five. Enjoy that potentially fun-centered day. Me, I’ll just editing the film, but that’s pretty fun. ** Mildred, Hi. Uh, my favorite of his is ‘Un Lac’. But ‘Sombre’, his first, is a good entrance point if you want to start earlier. I agree about the conscious/ unconscious balance. It’s tricky and exciting to get that right. The only happy accident I can remember at the moment is that one of our actors was really sick once day but had to work anyway because our schedule was so tight, and his sickness made him kind of listless and sad, which, now that we’re going through the footage, worked accidentally perfectly for his scene. Nice story about the drummer. Same with acting. There are scenes in our film where we thought an actor was pushing it too much or too little, but then on film it somehow is amazing. Best to you, M. ** Guy, Thanks! Quality-wise, you probably made the better choice on the poetry front with Pasolini. I hate thinking about money. I can’t think about money without worrying about it. Self-disclipine helps a lot, obviously. I’m weirdly disciplined. Sometimes I procrastinate too lengthily before bearing down on a project, but once I’m on the ‘job’, I get very locked in. Pardon me for my space out — I’m rushing to get to the editing room and a bit sleep deprived — but where is here again? I’m sure I’d love to go there. Editing is going to be consuming until the mid-to-late fall, so that’ll keep me stuck in place a bit. Have a swell day. ** Dee Kilroy, Hi, Dee! It’s great to meet you, and thanks so much for entering. Ha, I’m kind of happy you started with ‘TMS’ since that’s my favorite of my novels, but it is a strange entrance. I’m always kind of amazed that any of my books are in any library, in the US at least. Cool. Michael Nava, that’s pretty different, ha ha. And, wow, your dude is optimistic, or, dare I say, a little naive? But naïveté is lovely. I miss it. You can ask me a personal question if you want. As for the question you asked, I actually don’t know the story of Bluebeard’s wife off the top of my head, at least this morning. What’s her deal? Thanks, Dee. Hope to see you again. ** Jack, See if it’s appropriate and/or find out what you think. NYC does look quite astonishing in the news footage. Kind of a really ugly yellow color though. Thanks about the editing. We’re almost finished with an entire first rough cut. Pretty exciting. Clearer skies to you. ** jack_henry, Hi! I think there was a time when the mention of Abramović’s name would send me on a lengthy rant, but I guess I’m just bored with her now. I do like performance art a lot. Most of my performance faves are in the past because France doesn’t really have a performance art tradition/scene. Everything here is either dance or theater. Some of my long time faves are Dancenoise, Ishmael Houston-Jones (whom I’ve collaborated with), Jeff Weiss, Vito Acconci, Mike Kelley, … I could go on. Are you interested in performance? Is there much going on in Milwaukee on that front? Greetings from sunny Paris. ** Nick., Hi, Nick.. Rice noodles sound good, I’m going to eat some today by hook or crook. It is fun: the editing. Tough at times. Like there’s one scene late in the film that’s very important and we have not been able to make it work right in the editing yet. But generally it’s been kind of dreamy. Crazy and hot, what more could you possibly ask for, ha ha? Probably better that it’s your body that’s not over the boy than your mind, in my experience. The end of world, which I personally don’t think is quite here yet, needs a perfect rock star, and why not you for goodness sake! I slept shit last night, but there’s always later today. Take care. ** Okay. Tim Callum has a wonderful batch of people for you to dip into today. Be there/here. See you tomorrow.

Philippe Grandrieux Day *

* (expanded)

 

‘The films of Philippe Grandrieux pulsate. They pulsate microcosmically: in the images, the camera trembles and flickers so violently that, even within a single, continuous shot, no photogram resembles another. And they pulsate macrocosmically: the soundtrack is constructed globally upon unidentifiable, layered, synthesised, ambient noises of breath or wind, sucked in and expelled, which underlie the entire film and constitute its disturbed heartbeat, returning to our ear when all other sounds have disappeared. In the very beginnings and endings of his films, over the credits, there is nothing but this strangely bodily sound.’ — Adrian Martin, Kinoeye

‘There is something profoundly new about Grandrieux’s plastic exploration of violence, but also something very contemporary. His approach is not based on such editing and framing effects one finds and admires in Hitchcock and Ray, nor in an exploration of excess as in Tarantino. He works on the inside of an image, on the special relation between the luminous content and the vibrant and fragmentary representation.’ — Christa Bluminger, Parachute

‘Grandieux’s films carefully try to understand the exact inner-working of one’s psychic, and more especially the part that deals with desire and transformation. How does desire work? What are the elements that this energy-matter is using to expand its empire? What are the social repressions that desire has to face? Unlike Pasolini who is really interested in the way that society is theatrically transforming the ceremony of predating into a show, there is here an experimental cinema; it is true; that is trying to register, thanks to the camera, what humans eyes would never be able to see in order to deconstruct and analyze reality. Grandrieux’s films are analytical films, like a microscope, that give the viewer the possibility to see more accurately what is movement, emotion, sensation, colour, darkness and the emergence of the image (either material or thought). What is the process that enables something to become an image in the dark? Why can this process only be seen as a threat?’ — Jean-Claude Polack

‘In his films, Philippe Grandrieux has revealed his startlingly corporeal vision of a world in which the body and its drives remake cinematic form and content alike. Often compared to the work of Stan Brakhage, Grandrieux’s films similarly reject representational cinema in favor of a mode of filmmaking that, in Brakhage’s famous phrase, realizes “adventures in perception.” In Grandrieux’s case, this approach entails a radical reworking of the frame, offscreen space, lighting and even focus, at times edging the image towards the barely perceptible. No less radical is Grandrieux’s approach to sound, which is often distorted and accentuated, with dialogue kept to a careful minimum and music alternately ambient and blaring. Grandrieux’s is a cinema of vibrations and tremors in which image and sound seem to pulsate with a kind of furious life.

‘The subjects of Grandrieux’s first two features, Sombre and New Life – a serial killer and sex trafficking, respectively – quickly gave him the reputation of being something of an enfant terrible. Yet, while Grandrieux’s vision is very dark – literally and figuratively – it is never gratuitous but rather an extension of the French fascination, from Sade to Bataille to Genet, with the body’s potential to undo subjectivity in the gaps between social order and animality, where the body/corporeality itself becomes radically refigured not as the vehicle for consciousness but as flesh with a life of its own. Even those who, like Jonathan Rosenbaum, have reservations about the sexualized violence of Grandrieux’s first two films will appreciate the originality and gravity of their formal audacity.’ — Harvard Film Society

‘Grandrieux’s reflection belongs to the body’s modernity – the modernity of Sigmund Freud, Antonin Artaud, Gilles Deleuze and Michel Foucault, to name only a few – and thus returns the anthropological need for representation to a state of immanence. The image is no longer given as a reflection, discourse, or the currency of whatever absolute value; it works to invest immanence, using every type of sensation, drive and affect. To make a film means descending, via the intermittent pathways of neuronal connection, down into the most shadowy depths of our sensory experiences, to the point of confronting the sheer terror of the death drive (Sombre), or the still more immense and bottomless terror of the unconscious, of total opacity (La Vie nouvelle).’ — Nicole Brenez

 

___
Stills





































 

____
Further

Philippe Grandieux Official Website
PG @ IMDb
PG @ Wikipedia
PG interviewed by Nicole Brenez
Magick Mike on PG’s ‘Sombre’ @ EEP
PG’s ‘Un Lac’ reviewed @ Screener
PG @ Facebook
PG @ the Harmony Korine Website Forum
Video: PG interviewed (in French)
PG Torrent Search
PG interviewed @ Rouge

‘Film Comment Selects: Philippe Grandrieux Films’
‘Malgré la nuit’ page @ Facebook
‘PHILIPPE GRANDRIEUX HAPPILY BRINGS HIS DARK VISIONS TO LINCOLN CENTER’
‘La caméra haptique de Philippe Grandrieux’
‘Propos de Philippe Grandrieux’
‘Entretien: Philippe Grandrieux [critikat.com]’
‘Dans une langue étrangère” Un lac de Philippe Grandrieux’
‘ARTIST IN FOCUS: Philippe Grandrieux’

 

____
Extras


Philippe Grandrieux / films by / extracts


Alan Vega ‎– ‘Les Amours Perdues’ from Philippe Grandrieux’s “Sombre”


Cápsula 04 – Philippe Grandrieux


Oscuro – Philippe Grandrieux


MARYLIN MANSON / Putting holes in happiness // Directed by Philippe Grandrieux


Tristan und Isolde in de regie van Philippe Grandrieux

 

_____
Interview

 

I was wondering about the dimension of politics in your work. In former films like SOMBRE or LA VIE NOUVELLE you have political references and now with portraying Masao Adachi, one of the most radical and well known activists and filmmakers in Japanese history, of course you created a very explicit context. Do you consider the film as a political film?

Philippe Grandieux: Well, it’s trivial to say that, but all our acts involve politics. You couldn’t be here without thinking about politics. It is much more than ideology; it’s decision in fact. Politics means making decisions about your own life: How you act in the world and how you want to be. So it’s really something very important. In SOMBRE for instance there wasn’t any morality – no good, no bad. It is a decision, a very political decision to let the audience face their own desire, their own unrest. LA VIE NOUVELLE was more or less the relationship between the chaotic historical post-communism in Bulgaria and the chaotic psychic world. You drive inside of it. So ADACHI is politics but a very sensual movie at the same time, I hope. It’s based on emotion and sensation, as my movies generally are. Making movies, like life, is a path. So you’re following your own path as much as you can. Sometimes you’re weaker and sometimes you feel energized. This is always more or less the same question I’m working on.

I noticed as well that you link, in a very interesting way, the portrait of Adachi itself and the formal strategies of the feature films you did before, for example the dissolution of the images which are mirrored in the landscape of Tokyo that you depict repeatedly. I have the impression that the connection of this real political background with your artistic style gives your work a new layer.

PG: You’re right, yes. It’s true.

Do you intend to further follow this direction?

PG: The movie I’ve just finished now is called WHITE EPILEPSY and it’s supposed to be a kind of a tryptich on the question of unrest. This movie is very particular, because for me it’s a feature film, but it’s done out of a very radical position: the frame is vertical. The question of storytelling also became very important to me, in order to understand how I want to work with it. In WHITE EPILEPSY there are no more questions of characters and the psychological map of the characters throughout the movie, of how the story grows out of these characters – instead the question is more about the event: something happens. Questioning the event is rather in the centre of the movie itself compared to the development of the story. This is something that I really want to work on. I also want to further pursue the relation between sensation and emotion. They are two different issues, but not so far from each other. I try to explore the same possibilities over and over through cinema.

I’ve heard that after Masao Adachi you and Nicole Brenez are planning to portray other radical filmmakers as well? Will you be directing?

PG: No. We try to provide the possibility for making other movies but I’m not going to do the other ones myself. Other filmmakers will. We have a project on René Vautier, a french filmmaker. A very strong guy: at 15 he was a part of “La Résistance” in France, after which he fought against the colonization, in Algeria too. Now he’s old, maybe 80-82, but he is an incredibly strong filmmaker. We also plan a project on newsreels in America. Well, we’ll see, because for this series we haven’t got any money yet. We don’t want to write things to get money so we try to keep it very, very free. Because I think this is very important. This movie – ADACHI – as I went to Tokyo, I was facing the possibility that there might have been no movie at all in the end. So it was not necessary to finish something. This gives you a lot of freedom.

Since you were mentioning the money aspect: This is of course closely linked to the fact that depending on your work it is not easy to reach an audience. I have the impression that you’re a filmmaker who seeks to address people through cinema and move something in their way of perceiving the world. Being fairly well known now, is it easy for you nowadays to reach new audiences? Are you actively trying to reach out?

PG: I would like to try to expand the possibilities of cinema with my next feature film. It’s not necessary to reach huge audiences. Maybe the audience will be more important than the other movies had, but I can’t think in terms of that. I really try to follow my own steps.
I’m very interested in actors, stars. I think it could be very interesting to make a movie with no money at all but with very well known actors. Because this is also a part of what ‘cinema’ is. It’s about political problems, agents, lawyers, distributors and sellers. About these very well formed industrial systems and I think they offer a huge possibility for working. I would like to try something alike next.

I’m interested in the relationship between emotion, sensation and intellectualization. How has it changed over the years in your personal view and in the reception of others, in their approach of others towards your work?

PG: I think it depends on where you are, because when you are making movies – as Adachi says at the end of the movie – there is an intellectual aspect, but in the end it must be about the sensation itself. Because sensation is life in a way: something you couldn’t control, that you couldn’t put inside any kind of system. Even if the systems are very, very clever and very powerful. Think of Leibnitz or Kant – even with all these very strong philosophers we couldn’t reach the real point of knowing what life is. Maybe ‘odd’ is a possibility. Maybe it’s the only one. Sometimes I think like this, when I am in a positive mood.

To answer your question: When you do a movie, you organize things, you write, you scout, you cast, you think a lot, you take notes, you write the script, you prepare everything, it’s a very intellectual process. But when you shoot it’s something else. It’s really back to sensation, pure sensation, pure feelings, and pure intuition. A beautiful aspect is that time is an editing process, an intellectual process. You cut things and put them together, and after a while sense appears. But sensation is something else. It’s intuition, pure duration. It’s not any more the time that you can cut into discrete seconds; it’s an eternity inside of yourself. It’s a big question. Maybe the same question as: If you are thinking too much in terms of intellectuality and sense, you’re thinking in terms of immortality. If you’re thinking in terms of duration you’re thinking in terms of eternity. It’s two different ways to be and to me art is really part of these eternity feelings, which are a part of us.

What about the reception that comes from the outside, from theorists or critics? Do you still find something useful, when they interpret your work in a highly intellectual way?

PG: Well, it’s not helpful at all to make movies. It’s helpful for me to be inside of the world. I mean to be with my… I don’t know what to say. It’s helpful, because you see that what you are trying to do is not just ‘nowhere’. Of course it’s important. But after a movie is done, one can write a thousand pages. It’s strange; it’s really something completely different.

And what about beauty? Is this something you are searching for? Have you got a concept of beauty or is it pure instinct? For example Bruno Dumont says that he tries to avoid beautiful images, but that is something I can’t believe.

PG: It’s not beauty at this level; it is not the question of beautiful images. The beauty is something much stronger. When Dostojewski says that the beauty saves the world, the question is not about doing beautiful things. Beauty is a political decision in a way. It’s to be alive with your own self, strongly alive. I mean not under submissions. Beauty is the possibility to feel ‘la force’, the strength of the things, the reality and the real. So beauty is very important of course, but it’s not at all about beautiful pictures.

What about melancholy? When I saw UN LAC it seemed to me that for the first time in your work appeared a very strong sense of sadness. Do you think sadness is a proper way to react to this world?

PG: I think it’s impossible to be untouched by melancholy. We are dealing with time, memories and our childhood. We can’t escape from this and I think these melancholic dimensions are very important. It’s also in terms of politics: All the organizations are transforming more and more into paranoid systems in which you fit in. You fit in via computer, cell phone or Facebook – it’s a paranoid organization of our feelings. Melancholy is something else. Melancholy could be dangerous too, as a tendency you may incline towards. But it’s very important.

Maybe it’s kind of subversive to be melancholic.

PG: I think so, yes. You know these systems to control the streets? If somebody stops walking, after two or three minutes, the computers signal that somebody stopped walking. Something happened. Someone stopped in the middle of the street, but the person shouldn’t be immobile. This is a very interesting conception of your destiny [laughs].

You mentioned that you try to dive further into this field of pure sensation. Now you did WHITE EPILEPSY. I heard it is very focused on bodies. I wonder if it is very important for you to find a certain body. Would you cancel a project if you couldn’t manage to find a certain professional or non-professional?

PG: Absolutely. For this project I worked with a dancer, Hélène Rocheteau. We worked together on what we can call choreography, although I’m not a choreographer. It was a piece of twelve minutes; it was shown in Metz in France and was very interesting. It was a cycle and featured a loop of Joy Division music: a ceremony. We worked on insect movements, on the way insects are completely limited to their instinct. For them there is no possibility to escape their instincts at all. There are very few needs, but these needs are accordingly intense, there is no doubt. We tried to work on these kinds of movements and I was very impressed by her body, how she can move each muscle with such intense possibilities, like Butoh dancers. An when I was thinking about WHITE EPILEPSY I had this idea of this naked body, that I can be with her in this kind of very, very strong relation: very strange way of movement, human but not completely human.

Being a critic and writing about film, I’m more and more doubting that people take out a lot with them, when they leave the cinema. I’m a bit pessimistic about film and the way that it fails to activate something in audiences. Many seem to use these two hours in order to separate themselves from their lives. I would love to contribute to them connecting more to film and I’m trying to do my part through writing. Since we talked about bodies, do you think that using the body and its physicality expands the possibility of cinema to reach people more intensely?

PG: That’s an interesting point of view, the question how cinema is moving inside of us. We never know; it’s strange. Maybe cinema is less powerful than years ago. But I couldn’t really think in those terms, because I don’t like glorifying the past. We are here, just here and now, and we are dealing with our reality. This is nice and it’s strong and I like it. I have no regrets about anything – no regret about the 35mm, no regret at all. I like numeric cameras and if tomorrow there are no more cameras, ok. Then there are no more cameras; who cares. But the question you rose, how the movies are inside of us, or what we can call movies today, I think this is very important. Because I’m sure it is still operating, it is still strong. I mean you are still undergoing a certain experience when you go see a movie. If it’s pure entertainment, you get a good moment with your friends, you have a beer and that’s it. Why not? We shouldn’t be dogmatic in this aspect of the things. But you know, there are some kinds of movies that move you very deeply and sometimes even influence all of your live. Of course, this is what I would like to try to catch with my work. I don’t know if I have success. I would like to put one human being in front of these pictures, inside of this sound, inside of this world to get the possibility to feel something within itself. No words, just the feeling of being alive and of the complexity this situation achieves.

 

______________
10 of Philippe Grandrieux’s 13 films

_________
Sombre (1998)
‘Philippe Grandrieux’s first full length cinema film has unleashed a storm of controversy since its showing at the Locarno initernational film festival in 1998. It had critics solidly divided into two camps – those who regard it as an obscene, unwatchable mess, and others who rate it as a sublime masterpiece of the psychosexual thriller genre. It is clearly a film which is acceptable only to certain tastes, and many will find the film very hard to stomach. Certainly, Grandrieux’s extremely minimalist photography, much of which involves jerky camera movements and hazy out-of-focus images shot in virtual pitch-blackness, makes few concessions to traditional cinema audiences. To his credit, this unusual – and frankly disorientating – cinematography serves the film well, heightening the menace in the killer and the brutality of his murders by showing little and prompting us to imagine much more than we see. The idea presumably is to show the world as the obsessed killer sees it, through a darkened filter with periodic loss of focus.’ — James Travers, filmsdefrance


Excerpt


Excerpt


Excerpt

 

_____________
La vie nouvelle (2002)
‘Since its premiere screenings in late 2002, Philippe Grandrieux’s second feature La Vie nouvelle (The New Life) has been a cause célèbre. On its theatrical release in France, it was savaged by a large number of prominent newspaper and magazine reviewers. But the film has many passionate defenders. Grandrieux’s work plunges us into every kind of obscurity: moral ambiguity, narrative enigma, literal darkness. La Vie Nouvelle presents four characters in a severely depressed Sarajevo who are caught in a mysterious, death-driven web: the feckless American Seymour (Zach Knighton), his mysterious companion (lover? friend? brother? father?) Roscoe (Marc Barbé), the demonic Mafioso Boyan (Zsolt Nagy), and the prostitute-showgirl who is the exchange-token in all their relationships, Mélania (Anna Mouglalis). Eric Vuillard’s poetically conceived script takes us to the very heart of this darkness where sex, violence, betrayal and obsession mingle and decay. Grandrieux feels freer than ever to explore the radical extremes of film form: in his lighting and compositions and impulsive camera movements; in the bold mix of speech, noise and techno/ambient music (by the celebrated experimental group Etant Donnés); and in the frame-by-frame onslaught of sensations and affects.’ — Adrian Martin, Kinoeye


Excerpt


Excerpt


Excerpt


Philippe Grandrieux, à propos de La Vie Nouvelle

 

_____________
Un lac (2008)
‘How to sum up Un Lac? It’s no easier than with Sombre or La Vie nouvelle, the two last films by Philippe Grandrieux. Suffice to say that Grandrieux has been hotly acclaimed on both sides of the Atlantic as one of Europe’s most innovative and uncompromising filmmakers, his visionary films testing the very limits of screen language. This minimalist new work is at once Grandrieux’s most accessible film and his most abstract. The vestigial narrative takes place in a frosty Northern landscape of forests and mountains, where young woodchopper Alexis lives with his sister, their blind mother and a younger brother. Then one day a younger man arrives on the scene… Grandrieux doesn’t make events easy for us to follow, often shooting in near-darkness, with sparse dialogue sometimes pitched barely above a whisper. But narrative apart, the film is distinctive for the unique, self-enclosed world that Grandrieux creates with a palette reduced almost to monochrome: a world of stillness and near-silence, of forbidding yet alluring landscapes whose affinities are as much with the Romantic paintings of Caspar David Friedrich, as with the cinematic ilk of Alexandr Sokurov, Bela Tarr and Fred Kelemen.’ — Jonathan Romney


Trailer


Excerpt


Excerpt


Making of Un lac

 

_____________
Il se peut que la beauté ait renforcé notre résolution – Masao Avachi (2011)
‘This tribute to the radical Japanese writer-director Masao Adachi is the first in a series of documentaries that Philippe Grandrieux wants to dedicate to deeply political filmmakers. For decades, the eccentric Adachi was a member of the extremist Japanese Red Army. French director Philippe Grandrieux (Sombre, 1999; A Lake, 2009) wants to make a series of portraits of politically committed filmmakers. His film about Japanese avant-gardist Masao Adachi (1939) is the first in this series. In the 1960s and 1970s, Adachi was a prominent film critic and underground filmmaker, with experimental films such as Sain (1963) to his name. He often collaborated with his contemporary and ally Nagisa Oshima, wrote scripts for Koji Wakamatsu and made films in the pink genre. Disappointment with the political direction of Japan made him join the the extreme left-wing Japanese Red Army in the early 1970s and he started making films in Beirut. Grandieux engages in sometimes cryptic conversations with him about film, art and politics and films him in his characteristic style: sometimes out of focus, sometimes under or over- exposed. With a few clips from Adachi’s work, such as The Red Army/PFLP: Declaration of World War from 1971.’ — IFFR


the entire film

 

_____________
White Epilepsy (2012)
‘Philippe Grandrieux’s work has often invoked the world of Francis Bacon, but in this almost purely experimental piece it is even more pronounced, as he takes Bacon’s fascination with the triptych and the body and insists on utilising only the middle section of the frame. Here are bodies in primordial states, fully formed as muscle and flesh, but as if unformed in the nature of their desires and subsequently somehow closer to nature. Utilising a dense soundtrack that both suggests the internal organs (lungs, larynx and heart) and the extended sounds of the forest, Grandrieux has made a film that isn’t easy to watch but equally not easy to forget. It is a strategy that has worked wonderfully well for him in the past with moments from Sombre (for example, the Punch and Judy contest), La vie nouvelle (the scenes filmed with a thermo camera) and the misty lake in Un Lac all examples of the cinematically unforgettable. Perhaps the images here are too abstract and sculptural to fascinate us fully, without that soupçon of story that can make Grandrieux’s work maddeningly suggestive, but this is is still a film by a modern master.’ — List Film


Trailer

Watch the film here

 

______________
Meurtrière (2015)
‘The film opens on the body of a naked woman, lying on her back. Only her flesh, muscles, curves and hollows are thrown into relief against the surrounding darkness. Her face remains invisible. Slowly, to a rhythmic soundtrack of muffled, raspy breathing, other bodies appear, their faces also masked and their nudity on full display. In slow motion, arms, legs, bellies and breasts intertwine, collide, latch together, submit or hold still in a resolutely static and vertical frame. As each scene flows into the next, throbbing and relentless, the atmosphere grows threatening and disquieting. Cinema in its most stripped-down form becomes a pure sensory experience, the stock-in-trade of French director Philippe Grandrieux (Un lac). The second movement of his performance triptych Unrest after White Epilepsy, Grandrieux’s exploration of worry, Meurtrière is a striking tableau vivant reminiscent of Goya and Francis Bacon and populated by the bodies of four dancers: Émilia Giudicelli, Vilma Pitrinaite, Hélène Rocheteau and Francesca Ziviani. Graceful yet ruthless, obscene yet mystical, monstrous yet sublime, the film fascinates by virtue of its hypnotic, unsettling tone.’ — Festival du nouveau cinéma


Trailer

 

_____________
Malgré la nuit (2015)
‘Early in Philippe Grandrieux’s Malgré la Nuit, Lenz (Kristian Marr) encounters a friend (Lola Norda) in a dark, abstract space illuminated only by a faint copper-toned light as smoke billows around them. They call each other out in diaphanous whispers enhanced by the absence of any diegetic noise, until their hands touch. She asks him what he’s doing back in Paris, to which he plaintively responds, “I’m searching for Madeleine,” crystallizing the film’s axis of conflict: the regaining of a lost love. It’s an unusual start coming from a filmmaker who routinely eschews anything that so much as resembles plot markers or sentimentality. Then again, no one accustomed to Grandrieux’s penchant for disruption should be too surprised by this. Since his startling debut feature, Sombre, Grandrieux has become one of cinema’s most audacious chroniclers of society’s underbelly, maybe even its best articulator of heightened sensations; despair and ecstasy erupt from the fabric of his films with a blistering, almost physical intensity. While Grandrieux’s fourth fiction feature continues his usual investigation into the limits of experience and range of cinematic possibilities, there’s also a strong willingness here to work along a more traditional narrative scheme. Not that Grandrieux has totally softened up. Malgré la Nuit still plays out like a sordid nightmare straight out of Georges Bataille’s imagination.’ — Film Comment


Trailer


Excerpt


Critics’ Talk: Philippe Grandrieux (Malgré la nuit)

 

__________
Unrest (2017)
‘In a career spanning more than 40 years, Grandrieux has interrogated the power of images and presented us with every possible permutation of love, violence and life itself, often in its most extreme forms. His latest short film ‘Unrest’ is the final part of a 10 year project, a triptych of short works (with ‘White Epilepsy’ and ‘Meurtriere’) grouped together under the collective title ‘Unrest’. Here Grandrieux strips back his vision to its most minimal form yet to present us with a vision of bare life that evades enclosure within fixed form and meaning. As Grandrieux has written, ‘No narrative link unites the three parts of the triptych, what we have is rather three stages of bodily presence, three affective intensities, three events that we are able to access only via what they make us experience inside of us, our own disquiet’.’ — QAGOMA


Trailer

Watch the film here

 

____________
‎The Scream (2019)
‘Split-screen of three identical scenes (the middle offset by 3 seconds and the right by 5) of “cathartic performances” of naked women screaming, laughing, singing, writhing around, banging the walls and floors, allows Grandrieux a more emotive response to his bodily works, even if their derivative form makes predecessors like Meurtrière superior in their quiet resolutions. The Scream probably works better as an installation as it appears to be, so I won’t deride it much for its repetitive nature; however, the distinct lack of slow-motion or ambient noise is disappointing given their effective use in all of Grandrieux’s other works.’ — sky3088

Watch the film here

 

_____________
w/ Lav Diaz, Manuela de Laborde, Óscar Enríquez Liminal (2020)
‘A FICUNAM commission for four directors, Liminal seeks to play with poetic affinities between film and music. Moving across aesthetic and generational differences, the film-makers explore this relationship through four distinct stories as to context and imaginary. Grandrieux’s opening short “La Lumière la Lumière” is the standout. It covers the investigation on the relationship between body and light that Grandrieux has becoming even more interested during the past decade and does so in exciting miniature fashion. It helps that Grandrieux project fits perfectly with the “poetic relationship between cinema and music” thst the movie synopsis claim links the four shorts, so he was very well suited for the commission, while everybody else mostly struggle to fit ideas into it.’ — Filipe Furtado


Trailer

 

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** Dominik, Hi!!! Yeah, I originally thought I’d only be in Paris for about six months so it was a little easier to think about. Hm, strange choice but maybe I’d like to see ‘The Wizard of Oz’ for the first time for some reason. Not sure why. You: same question? So I’ll see you next time as a Vienna person. A Vienner? Is there a name for it like Parisian or Los Angeleno? Safest, swiftest drive today if you see this before you split, and love slipping ‘We’re Off to See the Wizard’ into your car’s sound system, G. ** Guy, Hi. Oh, I don’t know. I’m actually of the opinion that there’s a ton of really interesting, daring fiction coming out right now, but you have to do your searching in the smaller indie presses. The big presses are largely deserts on that front. Let me have a think as to who as I’m in rushes these current days re: the p.s. because of marathon daily film editing sessions, but there’s a lot of exciting fiction being sprung upon the unsuspecting right now, I swear. I never thought about a career, I just thought of what it would take to pay the bills whilst I did what I really wanted to do the rest of time which, in my case, was write. Any ideas at all? I go to bed at about 10:30 every night and wake up at 6-ish, so I feel you on the all nighter stuff. ** Florian S. Fauna, Hi, Florian! Lovely to see you! We shot in Flamingo Heights, which you probably know is a kind of section of Yucca Valley, but of course we were in Joshua Tree a bunch getting supplies and eating and stuff. I have to say I’m very happy not to be there anymore, ha ha. I’ve been to Salton Sea, trippy, but not Bombay Beach. I’ll look for pix. How are you? ** _Black_Acrylic, Cool that you’re a big Zurn fan. She’s amazing. I haven’t read ‘The Man of Jasmine’. I’ll get it. Thanks, Ben. ** Steve Erickson, That’s curious, apparently there was a big outage in LA yesterday as well according to my friends there. Sounds like a great plan re: the music-only laptop. As far as an initial rough cut, I think we’ll likely have that in about a week, but then there’ll be many weeks of revising and fiddling. ** jack_henry, Hi, jack. Well, I don’t know her personally, but it’s true that I can’t stand her work. The reasons seem obvious to me, but … ha ha. Why do you ask? ** Bill, Awesome, interesting that she’s a big one for you. I would so love to see a show of her drawings. There was a museum in Vienna that had a lot of her work, but my trip was too time-tight to get there. Huh, I’ve never heard of ‘Virtue’. How curious it looks. I’ve never heard of Camera Obscura either. Wow, on the hunt for more about that. Nice. I feel like I should be excited about the Apple VR thing, but I just can’t get it up. ** Darbz 🐦, Hi. Paper writing rules. I always used to write my novels on paper by hand, but then I decided I should write ‘The Sluts’ on a computer since it’s set on a computer, and then I got spoiled, drat. If you need meds, for sure take them. Whatever it takes to feel right. Can you not restart them easily? Yes, I like Tim Buckley a lot too. Deep and adventuring. Yeah, great. Hanging out with friends sounds like a perfect plan, so I hope that goes well, and I’m here pretty much always awaiting any check ins you feel like making. xo. ** Kettering, Thank you for writing all of that. Hugs. ** Right. I decided to restore and expand the blog’s very old and out of date Philippe Grandrieux post. Know his films? Pretty amazing. A good peruse on your parts is highly recommended. See you tomorrow.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 DC's

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑