The blog of author Dennis Cooper

Author: DC (Page 20 of 1086)

Mimsy Farmer’s Day

 

‘Cult icon Mimsy Farmer was a pretty hazel-eyed blonde with the fragile features of a Mia Farrow or Yvette Mimieux and the independent streak of a Tuesday Weld. After playing the innocent virgin in a few movies and on TV, she essayed restless youth roles in a string of AIP drive-in exploitation movies in the late Sixties. Farmer then relocated to Europe, where with a whole new look, she became an international sensation in 1969 due to her mesmerizing performance as a heroin addict in More. Thereafter she remained in Italy in a series of popular European giallos and horror films between some acclaimed dramas that never found their way to the U.S.

‘Mimsy Farmer was born Merle Farmer in Chicago. Her parents, Arch and Suzette Farmer, were reporters for the Chicago Herald Tribune. Though named after her father’s favorite brother, she always went by the nickname Mimsy, which came from her mother who Mimsy suspects took it from the poem “The Jabberwocky” used in Alice in Wonderland. When their daughter was about four years old, the Farmers moved to Hollywood when Mimsy’s father took a job writing news for NBC-TV’s Los Angeles affiliate. While attending Hollywood High, the lovely teenager was discovered by an agent and almost immediately landed roles on TV’s My Three Sons and The Donna Reed Show.

‘Mimsy came close to replacing Sandra Dee as Gidget in Gidget Goes Hawaiian (1961), but the producers opted for Deborah Walley. As consolation, they gave her a bit uncredited role. Her official film debut was in the heartwarming or mawkish (depending on your taste—there is no in-between) family drama Spencer’s Mountain (1963). It was based on the novel by Earl Hamner, Jr., who later created the popular seventies television drama, The Waltons, and set in scenic Wyoming with the majestic mountain peaks of the Grand Teton Range as background.

‘Unhappy with her performance in Spencer’s Mountain, Mimsy began studying with esteemed acting coach Jeff Corey. Despite keeping busy on television including guest appearances on The Outer Limits and Perry Mason, Farmer kept her job selling candy at a local movie theater. She finally left it when she returned to the big screen in the soapy Bus Riley’s Back in Town (1965) directed by Harvey Hart from a screenplay by William Inge who had his name removed from the credits when Universal ordered a script re-write to make the film more of a vehicle for Ann-Margret. Aping James Dean, the brooding Michael Parks played a disillusioned sailor returning home after three years at sea. He finds his sultry ex-girlfriend (Ann-Margret) unhappily married to a wealthy older man, his job prospects bleak, and his younger sister (Farmer) has become the town tart. The film was not well-received though Farmer does well with her role.

‘For drive-in movie fans, 1967 was a banner year for Mimsy Farmer who had three films in release. Despite her ambition not to become an idol for the young, she became very popular with teenage audiences for a short period of time and began her ascension to cult movie actress. First up was the explosive youth exploitation classic Hot Rods to Hell from quickie producer Sam Katzman for MGM and directed by John Brahm whom Mimsy liked a lot. She credited him for teaching her the trick to crying on screen with a little help from glycerin drops in the eye. Originally made for television as 52 Miles to Terror, it was deemed to violent and released to drive-ins throughout the country instead with a more exploitative title. This was Farmer’s first real bad girl role after playing mostly ingénues. The worried actress remarked that she was cast by her looks alone and hoped she wasn’t going to now be typecast.

‘Mimsy Farmer and Laurie Mock were teamed again by producer Sam Katzman in her most notorious movie from this period, Riot on Sunset Strip. However, the roles were switched as Mock was cast as the out-for-kicks Liz-Ann friend of Farmer’s more conservative Andy who was described in the press book as “a real swinger, who took her first ‘trip’…all the way to Hell and back!” All the ingredients were present—hippies, LSD, protestors, free love, mod fashions, police brutality— to make Riot on Sunset Strip a camp classic of the alienated youth movie genre. The movie’s standout scene is Farmer’s wild LSD freak out dance where she writhes around the floor in her mod mini-dress gazing in wonder at her hands and feet. She then begins dancing around shaking her wild mane of hair ala Ann-Margret (critic Clifford Terry described it as “a dry-land water ballet”). Whatever you label it, it has become a YouTube favorite much to Farmer’s bemusement.

‘Unhappy with her husband and her career in Hollywood, Mimsy headed for Vancouver on advice from actor Peter Brown who told her about HollywoodHospital where they experimented with LSD and psychotherapy. After her own session, she began working there but quit when she realized the hospital never followed up with their patients after their “treatment.” Still in Vancouver, she received a life changing phone call from director Daniel Haller (one of her favorite directors) who wanted her for the female lead in his new movie The Wild Racers (1968), which was going to be shot on location throughout Europe. Mimsy played Katherine the girlfriend of race car driver Joe Joe Quillico (Fabian) who progresses from U.S. stockcar racing to traveling the European Grand Prix circuit. The more successful he becomes, the more his relationship with Katherine crumbles. This was the only film the actress did for AIP that was not a hit with the drive-in crowd. In an interview with the Oakland Tribune, Haller opined that it was a picture “too esoteric in its treatment to make as much money as it should have.”

‘Deciding to remain in Europe, Farmer sought out work there and landed the female lead in More (1969), first time director Barbet Schroeder’s cautionary tale of drug taking with an original song score by Pink Floyd. The actress was introduced to Schroeder by The Wild Racers’ cinematographer Nestor Almendros and associate producer Pierre Cottrell. Though not completely happy with the script or things her character had to do in it, Farmer accepted the role in part because she would get to work with her two friends again. The movie was filmed on a shoestring budget, but you would never guess that when watching the movie.

More was an international sensation and really clicked with young people of the time. It helped to kick off Mimsy Farmer’s European career, which lasted for over 20 years. Her films included Dario Argento’s suspenseful psychological thriller Four Flies on Grey Velvet (1971) and Lucio Fulci’s The Black Cat (1981). Her last acting credit is the Italian TV-movie Safari (1991) for director Roger Vadim. Today, Mimsy concentrates on her art (displayed on her web site www.mimsyfarmer.com) and sculpture work, which can be seen in such movies as Blueberry (2004), Troy (2004), Marie Antoinette (2006), The Golden Compass (2007), and Clash of the Titans (2010).’ — Sixties Cinema

 

___
Stills


























































 

___
Further

Mimsy Farmer @ IMDb
Mimsy Farmer Website
Mimsy Farmer Info Site
‘648: MIMSY FARMER’
‘façade: Mimsy Farmer’
‘Hommage à Mimsy Farmer’
Mimsy Farmer films @ MUBI
‘THE TRACK (1975) and more from Mimsy Farmer’

 

___
Extras


Alain Delon & Mimsy Farmer 1975


Bob Adkins interviews Mimsy Farmer and James MacArthur


A song by Nicola Piovani, performed by Mimsy Farmer


Mimsy Farmer Tribute

 

______
Interview

 

Your first big movie role was in Spencer’s Mountain. What was it like to work on this?

When we made Spencer’s Mountain I was fifteen and a half. I was accompanied by my mother and a teacher, and spent most of my time with them (or riding horseback) when I wasn’t working. I didn’t have many scenes with Henry Fonda who seemed pretty miserable and spent most of his time at the local café, or Maureen O’Hara who was also fairly distant. James MacArthur, who was quite a bit older than me, was nice but the person I felt most comfortable with was Wally Cox who seemed to take me more seriously and taught me some lovely Elizabethan songs, which I still remember. Delmer Daves [the director] was more concerned about my weight than about my acting, unfortunately, and kept telling me, ‘watch your bottom honey.’

What do you recall most about your second film Bus Riley’s Back in Town with Michael Parks and Ann-Margret?

I just remember being impressed by being on the same set with Jocelyn Brando [who played her mother], as much as if she’d been Marlon [her brother].

Hot Rods to Hell was your first real big screen bad girl role. What attracted you to the part?

I needed to work and couldn’t wait for a better offer. I also thought, ‘If Dana Andrews and Jeanne Crane had accepted who the hell was I to be finicky?’

Your next three movies were for American International Pictures. Did you sign a contract with them?

No, I had no contract with AIP but I was supporting my ‘cowboy’ husband [he was from Brooklyn and failing to get work as a stuntman in Hollywood] and a bunch of animals. The better directors were not lining up in front of my door pleading for me to be in their movies. They didn’t even know I existed.

You have a great LSD freak-out scene in Riot on Sunset Strip. Do you remember anything special about it or the movie itself?

That ‘great LSD freak-out scene,’ which I took very seriously at the time, has since become for me a source of amusement tinged with embarrassment. Somewhere on the internet someone said, ‘that scene is so bad, that it’s hilarious.’ I agree. I was pretty naive back then and so earnest!

In Devil’s Angels you played a local girl who makes trouble for the Hell’s Angels led by John Cassavetes. How was it to work with him?

I really liked Daniel Haller [the director], a very nice man, and admired John Cassevetes, also a very nice guy. All Cassavetes and I talked about was how much he missed his wife. Actually, I mostly listened. Anyway, doing a movie with him, even though he wasn’t directing it, was a step in the right direction.

Your last AIP movie was Wild Racers with Fabian and your second film directed by Daniel Haller.

I’d left my ‘cowboy’ husband and was working in a hospital in Canada where they were using LSD as a tool for psycho-therapy. The experience was enlightening but disappointing. When Daniel Haller called me, I jumped at the chance to go to Europe and also to see my brother Philip, who was living in London at the time. It was the best move I’d made up to then and I loved traveling in France, Spain, and Holland.

After accepting the role in More did the nudity ever become a concern? A number of your ‘60s contemporaries would not take roles where they has to be naked.

No, not all. Nudity was an integral part of the movies in which I appeared naked. Being flat-chested and boyish helped a lot and, I hope, there was nothing vulgar or lewd about these scenes.

Do you consider More of your best or important movies? Back then you remarked that you thought the idea of marijuana leading to heroin addiction was not believable.

I don’t think it is my best movie, though the role was interesting and Nestor Almendros’ photography was gorgeous. It was, though, very important for my career, both in the positive and in the negative sense. Its success in France was huge and overnight I became a ‘star’ but, as is often the case, I became ‘type cast’ and most of the roles directors offered me subsequently were those of neurotic or outright mad young women. Well, I can’t complain.

It’s true that I said, and still believe, that smoking grass does not in itself lead to shooting heroin. I know many people who light up a joint from time to time who have never touched anything harder and never will, myself included (though now I prefer a good glass of wine).

How would you rate Barbet Schroeder as a director? In an interview you gave to the New York Times you were unhappy with some of his directorial choices.

Well, I think now, that I was silly to berate Barbet and his movie at the time but I still think that it’s naive and moralistic and some of the scenes were an embarrassment to do, all the ‘Zen’ and ‘Lotus’ shots and the ‘unexplored brain’ nonsense. What I didn’t say though was that his movie was pretty daring and unconventional for those years, in Europe anyway, and that he was a better than average director.

Did you find a big difference between working in Europe versus Hollywood?

In Europe, actors were not shuffled off to their trailers between shots and were invited to participate and collaborate with the director and other crew members. It was so different. Nobody was anxious about my ‘bottom’ (admittedly much diminished) and nobody was redesigning my eyebrows and curling my hair. I just had the feeling that nobody wanted me to act or look like anyone but myself—such a relief!

Were you surprised that More was such a hit especially in France?

Yes, More got its chance because it had been so successful at the Cannes film festival but was blasted by the critics in the U.S. Of me, Newsweek said, “She acts the range of emotions from A to B.” Bette Davis once said, ‘Old age ain’t for sissies.’ I say, neither is being an actor!

You seem to have a healthy attitude about bad reviews.

For me, the movies I’ve done aren’t only about how they turned out but also, who was involved in them. Also, on the whole, when you’ve decided to live and work in a foreign country, you are the foreigner, and if you’re an actor there are limits to which and how many roles you’re going to be offered and if you’re working to make a living you can’t be too choosey and you’re mostly grateful when you can work.

 

___________________
15 of Mimsy Farmer’s 68 roles
______________
John Brahm Hot Rods to Hell (1967)
Hot Rods to Hell begins with corn and is full of corn, though it hits the viewer in waves rather than consistently. No amount of acting talent could have made this film phenomenal, as much of the cheese comes from the script itself. It is amplified, however, by often-exaggerated performances and a plethora of sudden zooms (for “dramatic” effect – usually on Dana Andrews’ face). One thing the film wins legitimate cool points for is style. Hot Rods to Hell is full of great music. Mimsy Farmer rocks some totally groovy outfits. The outfits worn by Gloria and Tina are completely indicative of the late ’60s, which enthusiasts of the era (myself included) will love.’ — The Motion Pictures


Trailer


Excerpt

Watch the film here

 

______________
Arthur Dreifuss Riot On Sunset Strip (1967)
‘For about the first two-thirds of the feature, both freaks and cops are sympathetically portrayed. The bad guys appear to be—in art as in life—the Sunset Strip merchants and business owners who used the police to harass longhairs. Wise as Solomon, patient as Job, the paternal Lieutenant Walt Lorimer (Aldo Ray) is the movie’s hero. He tries to broker a deal between the establishment and the freaks, whose number includes his estranged (because mom is a lush) daughter Andy (Mimsy Farmer). If a well-meaning liberal had written an episode of Dragnet, it would look something like this part of the movie. But at 47:55, a hippie cad doses Andy’s diet soda, and the application of a phasing effect to the electric blues on the soundtrack signals that all hell is about to break loose; though slow to build, the freakout that follows is epic, in the sense that it is very long. Now, the movie turns into a regular episode of Dragnet: five wasted youths, who have degenerated through regular acid use to the level of rutting curs, rape Andy while she trips. (If you’re thinking it’s like that scene in Touch of Evil, guess again.) Lt. Walt, who hasn’t seen his daughter in years, finds her naked at the scene of the crime, and suddenly the wealthy businessmen of the Sunset Strip don’t look like the bad guys anymore.’ — Dangerous Minds


Trailer


Excerpt

 

______________
Daniel Haller Devil’s Angels (1967)
‘With only a $4 million gross, Devil’s Angels may not have been a major hit for AIP, but it’s still an interesting and well-done biker film which features several highly recognizable faces from 1960s/70s cinema and television such as Marc Cavell (Cool Hand Luke), Russ Bender (Bonanza), Buck Taylor (Gunsmoke), Bruce Kartalian (The Outlaw Josey Wales) and Mitzi Hoag (Deadly Game). Although not nearly as well-remembered as the Dennis Hopper/Peter Fonda 1969 classic Easy Rider nor as hard-hitting as Al Adamson’s Satan’s Sadists from the same year, Devil’s Angels is a solidly-made, quirky and enjoyable exploitation film that benefits most from a wonderfully complex performance by the legendary John Cassavetes as well as an entertaining and thoughtful screenplay by the extremely underrated Charles Griffith. There’s also a terrific musical score written by Mike Curb and performed by Sidewalk Productions. Not to mention a catchy theme song by Jerry and the Portraits with additional music courtesy of Dave Allen and the Arrows.’ — Cinema Retro


Trailer


the entire film

 

_____________
Daniel Haller & Roger Corman The Wild Racers (1968)
‘Fabian plays Joe Joe Quillico, a cocky, womanizing, race car driver who loves to win! This is not your average racing movie. Filmed in Europe it has a distinctive “art film” feel with interesting edits and scene structure. And it’s got a lot of Grand Prix racing footage! Joe Joe Quillico is hired by a race car owner/businessman to be runner-up for a veteran driver in the year’s big European trophy races. Joe Joe doesn’t like coming in second and blows an engine disobeying the owner’s directive to not win. Eventually Joe Joe is given a shot; he wins a few races and becomes the toast of the European racing circuit. Now he’s a celebrity, gets product endorsement deals and parties like a wild man all while his ego explodes. He uses chicks as if he’s testing race cars!’ — The Video Beat


Trailer


Roger Corman on THE WILD ANGELS

 

______________
Barbet Schroeder More (1969)
‘The first directorial effort by Barbet Schroeder, the film became a hit in Europe, and today has now achieved the status of “cult classic”. Starring Mimsy Farmer and Klaus Grünberg, it is principally set on the sun-drenched Spanish island of Ibiza. A young German student, Stefan (Grunberg), is taking a break from his university studies. He hitchhikes to Paris for some freedom. He says he wants to be warm for a change, to have a chance to see the Sun. While at a party in Paris, Stefan meets a free-spirited American girl named Estelle (Farmer). He is instantly drawn to Estelle, and pursues her. He will even eventually follow her to the island of Ibiza. In Ibiza they slowly begin a relationship. Estelle introduces Stefan to many pleasures and freedoms, including taking drugs. Ultimately he will even try heroin, to which he eventually becomes addicted. The results are tragic. Schroeder has said that the story of More was modeled on the myth of Icarus and Daedalus, “with Estelle representing the Sun”. The film was shot on location by the legendary cinematographer Nestor Almendros, who was to become a long-time collaborator with Schroeder. More debuted in Cannes at the 22nd Cannes Film Festival, in May of 1969, and the U.S. premiere was in New York in August, 1969. The film’s musical score was unique for the time, as it was written and performed by the group Pink Floyd, they would later release the music as an album, Soundtrack from the film More. The score is now one of the reasons of its cult status.’ — BBS


Excerpt


the entire film

 

_______________
Georges Lautner Road To Salina (1970)
‘It was the last movie acted in by Ed Begley, who died the same year it was released. It was the third-to-last for Rita Hayworth, and her role as an out-to-lunch marm is eerie when you consider that she was later diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease. It was the only English language movie directed by Georges Lautner, who was a household name in his native France if not a universally appreciated auteur. The film is based on the French novel Sur La Route de Salina, penned by the ridiculously obscure writer Maurice Cury. The theme to its soundtrack (which is stunningly good) was used by Quentin Tarantino in Kill Bill Vol 2. There’s nothing particularly strange about the actors who played the two lead roles, but they’re both intriguing thespians. Mimsy Farmer, a quirky American beauty who had recently moved to Europe (she’s never left) and was just beginning a run of notable Euro art house film appearances, portrays a sexy psycho chick in a role not completely dissimilar to the one she’d done the year before in Barbet Schroeder’s cult classic More. The main male part, a hippy drifter, is ably handled by Robert Walker, Jr. son of acting people Jennifer Jones and Walker, Sr. (film noir lovers might remember Walker, Sr.’s beautifully perfect portrayal of the creepy Bruno in Alfred Hitchcock’s Strangers on a Train).’– criminal element


Trailer

Watch the film here

 

_______________
Dario Argento Four Flies on Grey Velvet (1971)
‘The little-seen Four Flies on Grey Velvet is perhaps most remarkable for it’s unusual spiritual underpinnings and Dario Argento’s deft attention for sexual signifiers. The title of this third and final film in Argento’s “animal trilogy” is as egregious as the weird science that literalizes the eye as a photographic camera. Rock star Roberto Tobias (Michael Brandon) leaves his rehearsal studio and follows a mysterious figure into an empty theater where he struggles with the switchblade-wielding man. Roberto accidentally stabs the man, who falls evocatively into the theater’s orchestra pit. From a balcony, a masked figure captures the moment on camera. If Argento’s signature use of a black-gloved killer is noticeably absent, this is compensated by the presence of Brandon himself, whose striking features recall those of the giallo director’s. There isn’t much to Four Flies on Grey Velvet besides pent-up rage though much of the film’s sexual frenzy prefigures themes from Deep Red.’ — Slant Magazine


Trailer


Excerpt

 

_____________
Fabio Carpi Body of Love (1972)
‘A father and a son meet for a holiday on a beach. The father is 62 and a researcher of insect life, the son is 15 and at a boarding school. They don’t have to say much to each other and both agree to „stop the experiment”. But then they come across the inert body of an unconscious young woman. They carry her to their beach house. She regains consciousness and it turns out that she speaks a language they do not understand. They treat her as their property, take her to the beach, to the small restaurant nearby and on boat trips. The woman’s presence enables father and son to come to terms. One day she disappears and they find her together with her hunky diver boyfriend who speaks her language as well as theirs. Father and son don’t like this intrusion into their harmonious triangle and they start fiddling with the hunk’s oxygen tanks …’ — manuel-pestalozzi


Excerpt


Mimsy Farmer on the set of Body of Love

 

______________
Francesco Barilli The Perfume of the Lady in Black (1974)
‘Written and directed by Francesco Barilli, Il profumo della signora in nero (The Perfume of the Lady in Black) is one of most bizarre Italian giallo films of the 1970s. Starring American actress Mimsy Farmer, the film tells the story of Silvia Hacherman, an industrial chemist who tries to escape from her troubled past. A series of musical and visual cues trigger terrifying visions as Silvia becomes the focus of a series of murders inspired by Lewis Carroll’s Alice in Wonderland…’ — Quartet Records


the entire film

 

_______________
Armando Crispino Autopsy (1975)
‘Like most gialli, the plot is convoluted and contrived, and the mystery unsolvable. Much is made of Mimsy Farmer’s obsession with death, sexual frigidity, and ambiguous relationship with her father, but director Crispino is little interested in subtext and motivation. Of course, one doesn’t watch a film like this for the story and theme, but rather the cinematography, graphic violence, and over-the-top acting. Autopsy doesn’t disappoint in any of these areas. Shot in Rome on a decent budget, Autopsy is a great film to look at. The colors are rich and vibrant. The camera work and editing, while not on par with Dario Argento, effectively conveys the lead character’s paranoia and disorientation. There is little onscreen carnage after the opening suicide montage. To make up for it, director Crispino gives us good, long looks at Mimsy’s research subject: cold, black-and-white photos of crime scenes, autopsies, and medical anomalies. While arguably a cheap ploy, these are real, grotesque, and sometimes strangely beautiful, and give the film an understated feeling of unease that a dozen fake splatter scenes couldn’t equal.’ — Classic Horror


Trailer


All Death Scenes

 

_______________
Serge Leroy La Traque (1975)
La Traque is an undeservedly obscure French drama/thriller that is incredibly tense, intelligent, compelling and unpredictable. The title, plot synopsis and awesome movie poster make you assume that this is another variant on the The Most Dangerous Game in combination with Straw Dogs or Deliverance, but the film is much more than that. It’s a dreary Sunday and a bunch of macho males gather in the countryside for an afternoon of wild boar hunting. The group of acquaintances (I really wouldn’t refer to them as close friends) exists of prominent aristocrats, like a land owner and an aspiring senator, as well as middle class guys, like a pair of car mechanic brothers and a former military man. During the hunt, the Danville brothers encounter Helen Wells, a beautiful English tourist searching for a country cottage to rent during the holidays. They viciously rape the defenseless poor girl, but she manages to wound Paul Danville and flee into the forest. Although none of the other hunting party members is responsible for what happened, they all have their own dark secrets and absolutely want to avoid getting linked to a scandal. Therefore, rather than helping Helen, they decide to collectively track her down and silence her. The acts and decisions taken by the lead characters may seem illogical and revolting, but they’re actually very realistic and plausible. In fact, La Traque is much more of a social character study instead of a rancid backwoods thriller. Real human beings are much more cowardly and self-protective than the heroes depicted in movies, as illustrated in the unforgettably bleak finale. The atmosphere of the film is thoroughly grim and depressing, with fantastic exterior locations and powerful camera-work. The all-star cast is sublime, with particularly Mimsy Farmer, Michael Longsdale and Jean-Pierre Marielle giving away solid performances.’ — Coventry


the entire film

 

________________
Marco Ferreri Bye Bye Monkey (1978)
‘Never one to embrace the ordinary, Italian arthouse director Marco Ferreri went hog wild with this New York City-based oddity starring Gerard Depardieu (back in his early, more subversive years, before turning into a fat French joke). And if you thought Ferreri’s LA GRANDE BOUFFE or THE LAST WOMAN were strange, he was simply warming up for this wrongheaded vision of America. The plot alone is enough to leave your queasy, with Depardieu playing a French cad (a big stretch, eh?) who works with a troupe of half-baked radical feminists (isn’t that redundant?) who feels they can’t effectively argue against rape until they’ve actually experienced the act firsthand. Later, he runs into eccentric old fart Marcello Mastroianni, who, while roaming Lower Manhattan, stumbles across a giant (fake) ape lying dead near the Hudson at the foot of the World Trade Center (shades of Dino DeL.’s KING KONG!), with a baby chimpanzee buried in its fur. And it’s no surprise when Depardieu adopts the cute li’l hairball, since they almost look like father ‘n’ son. The plot continues to spin uncontrollably.’ — Shock Cinema


Excerpt

Watch the film here

 

________________
Lucio Fulci The Black Cat (1981)
‘From Italy’s own Godfather of Gore Lucio Fulci (Zombie, The Gates of Hell) comes The Black Cat – a gruesome reimagining of the classic Edgar Allan Poe tale starring Patrick Magee (A Clockwork Orange) and Mimsy Farmer (The Perfume of the Lady in Black). When a young couple goes missing in a sleepy English village, Scotland Yard Inspector Gorley (David Warbeck, The Beyond) is brought in to assist on the case. But what starts off as routine investigation turns into a murder inquiry when the couple are found dead in mysterious circumstances. Fusing a classically gothic atmosphere with the decidedly more visceral elements that are the hallmark of Fulci’s films, The Black Cat is a too-often overlooked and underrated entry in the Italian master filmmaker’s canon.’ — Arrow Films


Trailer


Excerpt

 

_______________
Ruggero Deodato Bodycount (1987)
‘Although no film with David Hess, Mimsy Farmer AND Charles Napier could be a complete waste of time, BODY COUNT is still fairly routine. In addition to showdown!some fairly bad dialogue, it also features the most annoying variation on the chubby practical-joker character that I’ve ever seen, and it takes entirely too long for the killer to end the audience’s discomfort. Still, it’s rarely boring, with a few good moments, and many of the murders are pretty graphic (if not as gory as I’d been led to believe; I mean, this was directed by the same guy that helmed CANNIBAL HOLOCAUST (1979), for pete’s sake!)’ — Hysteria Lives


Excerpt


the entire film

 

_____________
Lewis Klahr Her Fragrant Emulsion (1987)
‘HER FRAGRANT EMULSION is an obsessional homage to the 60’s B-film actress Mimsy Farmer. The film’s visceral collage images act as a metaphor for sensuality and move in and out of sync with the soundtrack to evoke the distancing and intimacy cycles that are common in love relationships.’ –L. K.

Rent the film here

 

 

*

p.s. RIP Lionel Soukaz ** _Black_Acrylic, Hi, Ben. It’s great. I think Millhauser is one of the very, very best fiction writers in the US. Always a total pleasure. Hope you enjoy ‘Shame’. Wintery is such an appealing word, and I hope your weekend’s surroundings live up to it. ** Steeqhen, My favorite things tend to be things with high ambitions but without the means to achieve said ambitions. Zac’s and my films are always about that. As well as being perfect examples, haha. I’ll just peek at R&P, at least to start. Oh, well, good that you’ll have DH’s take to bounce off of. I get those random moments all the time, in fact. As much as I’m mostly drawn to experimental music, a perfectly constructed pop song is a heady drug. Great, your posted piece! I’ll devour it at the soonest opp. Everyone, Steeqhen has written what is no doubt a superb think-piece on his Substack about David Lynch entitled ‘David Lynch’s Emotional Resonance’, and you are hereby recommended to spend a little time there with attentive eyeballs. Go here. ** Misanthrope, Indeed. Do your very best, and fuck knows you already are. I’ll be chilling but hopefully working in my portion of the chill. ** Jack Skelley, It’s divinity. And we get to speak about it tomorrow. I’m very curious about Omar King’s book. I met him, and he is a serious total trip of a guy. Curious to hear your thoughts on him and, well, the event too. And the Movie Club thing. Wow, fun. God knows we all need every bit of respite we can get these days. ** Charalampos, I’m happy you’re on board with that novel. It’s a singular masterpiece if you ask me. ** Tyler Ookami, Hey. Yeah, I just literally cannot take reggae. It’s so not my rhythm or mindset. I really like dub and ska and toasters, and breakbeat ragga now that you mention it, but not just plain old reggae. It has the opposite of its intended effect on me. It just makes me tense. Strange. Yeah, Laika had the rights to ‘God Jr’ for about ten years. They intended it to be their first combo animation-plus-live action film, but I think they never quite ended up making that leap. I personally also quite like ‘Paranorman’, and ‘Box Trolls’ too to some degree. But, yes, they’re not the same group as they were back then. They were really interesting people. I had exciting conversations with them. ** James, It’ll be sad the day the blog shows you something, and you think, ‘Oh god, that again’. It’s a great novel. I very highly recommend it. I suppose I see the keys on a keyboard as technologically advanced pens perhaps. No muss, no fuss. I’m meh on beer, but I do like cider. Most hippies these days just seem like tech bros waiting for a barber. I applaud, no, wait, give you standing ovation for your day spent with GbV. I alway have to think when UK people say biscuit because the US definition of biscuit is something entirely different. Enjoy your relaxing weekend and get those eyelids of yours springy. ** Chris Kelso, Thanks, yeah, me too. 15 days is not insane. We shot ‘Permanent Green Light’ in 12 days. You just have to be extremely prepared and basically have every shot pre-planned and have your performers really ready to jump right into their characters because there’s no time to experiment on that schedule. I think I’m cool with YouTube game players. Watching them often helps me decide if I want to spring for a game or not. But, yeah, the less blathering the better. ‘All the Devil’s Are Here’, no, but I’ll hunt it assuming you’re recommending a hunt. Have a swell weekend, bud. ** Steve, Oops. Ah! Everyone, Steve has launched a new music track, “This Is The Water”, which I believe is a kind of an homage to the recently late Mr. Lynch if I’m not mistaken. You can listen to it, etc. here. Thanks, I’ll try to check out that analog series. My understanding is that we will be able to announce the World Premiere somewhere around the end of this month. ** Lucas, Hi. That makes sense. Yeah, I mean that’s obviously a big strength of the film. It just didn’t sit right with me. Totally subjectivity on my part there. My weekend? Well, yesterday when I was eating vegan Vietnamese food with friends half of one of my teeth broke off, so today I need to decide if I can live with a broken tooth or if I have to go to the dentist, and I’m really hoping it’s the former. Otherwise, work on the new film script, supervise some last little SFX work on ‘RT’, do my biweekly Zoom book/film club tomorrow. Like that. Xiu Xiu is back in Europe already? Wow. Have major fun. ** HaRpEr, True, but they’re just smart enough to know when they’ve been embarrassed, even if they can’t show that, happily. Actually, to finish my bully story, that boy, whose name was Scott, ended up falling in love with one of his straight friends and confessed to the friend who then told everybody about it, so Scott was outed, which wasn’t an easy thing back in the late 60s, and then after high school he moved to San Francisco and became a wild gay slut and ended up dying of AIDS, which is the really sad ending. It does sound maybe like ADHD. I hope you can just dismiss his shit and roll your eyes or something. But that’s annoying. You started filming, wow, cool. The editing is the best part. I think I partly make films just so I can edit them. Due to our having been stiffed during post-production by our monstrous ex-producer, Zac and I ended up editing ‘RT’ for six months by default, which was such a joy. The Millhauser novel is amazing. He’s an extraordinary writer. ** Dan Carroll, Hi. Yes, do read ‘Edwin Mullhouse’ if you can. It’s really singular and great. So far so good with the job, it sounds like. I guess that could get lonely and old, but … Yes, wonderful Millhauser quote. Hey, have a really fine weekend, Dan. ** Okay. If you’re not yet acquainted with the oeuvre of the beloved cult actor Mimsy Farmer this weekend offers you an opportunity to incorporate her. See you on Monday.

Spotlight on … Steven Millhauser Edwin Mullhouse: The Life and Death of an American Writer 1943-1954 by Jeffrey Cartwright (1972) *

* (restored)

 

‘Whether the point of this novel is to show us the adult that lies latent in the child or to reveal to us the child that the adult never manages to quite fully outgrow is a question that is difficult if not fruitless to answer. What is certain, however, is that the novel Edwin Mullhouse is brilliantly conceived. It is also shockingly well written, replete with uncannily accurate descriptions of childhood perceptions that can at times be overwhelmingly sympathetic. It is at turns funny, sad, insightful, and even profound; but above all else, it is deeply creepy: It reveals — almost imperceptibly at first, but then slowly, incrementally, the inertia builds, like a snowball rolling down the hill of your neighborhood cemetery — the dark, lurking, unconscious desires that shadow what we might otherwise simply take to be our bright, waking, thoughtful acts.

‘Originally published in 1972 by a then twenty-nine year old Steven Millhauser, Edwin Mullhouse is not the sort of novel that you would expect to be produced at that time by someone of that age. It is a novel out of synch with its time, but also ahead of it as well. It prefigures, albeit in a unique — and most likely inimitable — fashion, much of contemorary criticism’s obsession with positing the inseparability of act and artifact, and capturing creativity in mid stride. And by exposing a connection between adult obsessions and nostalgic recollections of childhood behaviors it provided and continues to provide a bounty of insight into contemporary adult psychology.

‘A single conceit enables this amazing feat: We are to believe that this book is the work of twelve year old Jeffrey Cartwright. During the course of this novel the perceptions, conceptions, recollections and general over-all mind-set of a young boy left fatherless by WW II are conveyed with all the skill and adeptness that only an experienced and highly practiced adult writer could possibly accomplish, yet we are to believe that it is the work of a sixth grader. And, implausible as it may sound, we do. While the language used in the writing of this book is clearly that of an adult, it somehow manages to seem– at the actual moments of its reading– that it is that of a child. How exactly Millhauser manages to pull this off it is extremely difficult if not impossible to know. Suffice it to say that Edwin Mullhouse constitutes a classic example of taking something which is in fact an arduous nerve-wracking task and making it seem as though it were mere child’s play.

‘The single most pronounced aspect of the prose that constitutes this work is the pyrotechnic language of its descriptive passages. In capturing the visual perceptions of children– or at least boys– it is simply unsurpassed.

‘It is at times hard to resist– during and after the reading of this work– the thought that Edwin Mullhouse is the secret font of a stream that has been irrigating and nourishing some distant and obscure fenced off field of popular culture about which we think we might have heard tell a tale or two but are never quite sure as to the veracity or accuracy of the reports. In the literature, film and– perhaps especially– the comics of the last few decades, we can’t help but notice faint hints of flavor, subtle aromas, and distant echoes which seem, now, after becoming familiar with it, to have somehow emanated from this work.

‘The inescapable conclusion one reaches after completing Edwin Mullhouse is that it has earned the right to be considered as a fixture in the firmament of 20th Century American literature. It may not shine as brightly as some others, but it is there nonetheless, its light traveling to us on a unique wavelength, neither replicated nor even approximated by any other.’ — The Copacetic Comics Company

 

_____
Further

Steven Millhauser @ The New Yorker
SM @ Harpers Magazine
Steven Millhauser @ Facebook
Steven Millhauser @ goodreads
‘Is Steven Millhauser America’s Best Short Story Writer?’
‘Eisenheim the Illusionist’, by SM
SM interviewed @ Transatlantica
‘The Fantastic Realist’
‘A Daydreamer in the Night: An Introduction to Steven Millhauser’
‘Understanding Steven Millhauser’
‘Steven Millhauser’s 6 favorite story collections’
‘The Fascination of the Miniature’
‘Steven Millhauser the Illusionist’
‘MATCHING STYLE AND THEME IN STEVEN MILLHAUSER’S “MIRACLE POLISH”’
‘What Can We Steal From Steven Millhauser’
‘Steven Millhauser’s stories of everyday wonder’
‘The Edge of Comprehension: On Steven Millhauser’
‘Recycling in Steven Millhauser’s Fiction’
‘A Master of the In-Between World’
Buy ‘Edwin Mulhouse’

 

____
Extras


Steven Millhauser: 2012 National Book Festival


“Home Run” by Steven Millhauser – An Electric Literature Single Sentence Animation


Mary Caponegro and Steven Millhauser Read From Their Work


The Story Prize 2011 at The New School

 

______
Interview
from BOMB

 

Jim Shepard: Perhaps as much as any American writer I can think of, you’ve been drawn to the novella. Are there aesthetic advantages and disadvantages peculiar to the form? Does it even have a form?

Steven Millhauser: Is it possible not to be drawn to the novella? Everything about it is immensely seductive. It demands the rigor of treatment associated with the short story, while at the same time it offers a liberating sense of expansiveness, of widening spaces. And it strikes me as having real advantages over its jealous rivals, the short story and the novel. The challenge and glory of the short story lie exactly there, in its shortness. But shortness encourages certain effects and not others. It encourages, for instance, the close-up view, the revelatory detail, the single significant moment. In the little world of the story, many kinds of desirable effect are inherently impossible—say, the gradual elaboration of a psychology, the demonstration of change over time. Think of the slowly unfolding drama of self-delusion and self-discovery in Death in Venice—a short story would have to proceed very differently. As for novels: in their dark hearts, don’t they long to be exhaustive? Novels are hungry, monstrous. Their apparent delicacy is deceptive—they want to devour the world.

The novella wants nothing to do with the immense, the encyclopedic, the all-conquering all-devouring prose epic, which strikes it as an army moving relentlessly across the land. Its desires are more intimate, more selective. And when it looks at the short story, to which it’s secretly akin, it says, with a certain cruelty, No, not for me this admirably exquisite, elegant, refined—perhaps overrefined?—delicately nuanced, perfect little world, whose perfection depends so much on artful exclusions. It says, Let me breathe! The attraction of the novella is that it lets the short story breathe. It invites the possibility of certain elaborations and complexities forbidden by a very short form, while at the same time it holds out the promise of formal perfection. It’s enough to make a writer dizzy with exhilaration.

JS: And how do such characteristics impact the novella’s form? Is it worth trying to talk about the peculiar nature of that form, or does that simply head us into the land of “There are as many forms as there are…,” etc.?

SM: The novella isn’t really a form at all. It’s a length, and a very rough length at that (sixty to a hundred pages? Seventy-five to a hundred and twenty-five pages?). In this it’s no different from the short story or the novel, which are frequently called “forms” but are in fact nothing but rough lengths. A true literary form exists only in the fixed poetic forms: the sonnet, the villanelle, the sestina, and so on. But having said that, I don’t mean to suggest that nothing more can be said about the novella. Length invites certain kinds of treatment rather than others. Just as a very short length is likely to concentrate on a very short span of time (say, a crucial afternoon), in a tightly restricted space, with a very small number of characters, and an extensive length is likely to cover a great stretch of time, in a wide variety of settings, with many characters, so the novella length seems to me peculiarly well suited to following the curve of an action over a carefully restricted period of time, but one wider than that suited to the short story, in a small number of sharply defined spaces, with two, three or perhaps four characters. To be more precise than that is to risk insisting on proper behavior. But the novella is much too alive to be asked to behave properly. Compared to the short story, it’s a length that hasn’t even begun to be explored.

JS: Part of the revelation of Edwin Mullhouse for many readers was its ability to render the intensity of attention involved in childhood perception: how certain objects, especially for children, become luminous, if not numinous. Does what you’re doing—when it’s going well—feel like aesthetic problem solving, or more exalted than that?

SM: Hmmm: aesthetic problem solving. That sounds like the sort of thing a sly critic might wish to say about a book he particularly dislikes. Of course, there’s no getting around it—one thing you relentlessly do when you write is solve aesthetic problems. But to leave it at that! No, when things are going well, the feeling I have is much more extravagant. It’s the feeling that I’m at the absolute center of things, instead of off to one side—the feeling that the entire universe is streaming in on me. It’s a feeling of strength, of terrifying health, of much-more-aliveness. It’s the kind of feeling that probably should never be talked about, as if one were confessing to a shameful deed.

JS: And is that a feeling that seems important in terms of understanding childhood?

SM: Yes, so long as it’s clear that, for me, childhood is above all a metaphor for a way of perceiving the world.

JS: In that we’re all, if we keep our eyes open, in the position of confronting barely apprehensible wonders?

SM: Exactly.

JS: Don Juan in “An Adventure of Don Juan,” the second novella in The King in the Tree, longs for “a madness of desire, a journey into feeling so intense that he would ride through himself like a conqueror of unknown inner countries.” Is that what fiction should enable?

SM: I’m fanatically reluctant to say that fiction ought to do one thing rather than another. I do know what I want from fiction. I want it to exhilarate me, to unbind my eyes, to murder and resurrect me, to harm me in some fruitful way. But that said, yes, the journey into intense feeling and the conquest of unknown emotional territory is something fiction can make possible.

JS: Your Don Juan also says of his host that “the irrepressible squire had a way of making you feel like a 12-year-old boy following an adventurous 14-year-old brother.” Is that also an ambition of your fiction?

SM: Fiction is an adventure or it’s nothing—nothing at all. What’s an adventure? An invitation to wonder and danger. If what I write doesn’t lead a reader into the woods, away from the main path, then it’s a failure. Somebody else wrote it. I disown it.

JS: Does that mean that your fiction is always in some ways a fiction of initiation?

SM: I would never myself put it in those words. That is, I would never say to myself: Now I am writing a story about initiation, or Now I have written a story about initiation. But if you define “initiation” to mean more or less what I mean by adventure and the wayward path, then it must be true that in some ways my fiction is a fiction of initiation.

JS: The narrator of “Revenge,” the first novella, in her opening paragraph compares houses where doors open right into living rooms to “being introduced to some man at a party who right away throws his arm around your shoulders,” and says she prefers instead “a little distance, thank you, a little formality.” Do you find yourself making aesthetic choices with the same sort of preferences in mind?

SM: Yes, I do. But words like “distance” and “formality” are easily misunderstood. To say I prefer distance isn’t to say I prefer coldness, haughtiness, lack of feeling, deadness. In my view, it’s precisely that “little distance” that permits genuine feeling to be expressed. My dislike of warm, cozy, chummy writing is that it always strikes me as fraudulent—a failure of feeling. Passion, beauty, intensity—everything I care about in art—is made possible through the discipline of distance. Or to say it another way: Powerful feeling in art takes place only through the particular kind of distance known as form.

JS: Many of your works play off literary antecedents in affectionate and complicated ways. Does that mean you’ll reread The Romance of the Rose or “The Cask of Amontillado” half thinking it might engender a story of your own? Or do you continually tell yourself you’re just reading?

SM: It may be that I’m deluding myself, but I never have the sense of looking for inspiration in my lustful, wildly irresponsible reading. What I’m looking for, I think, is pleasure so extreme that it ought to be forbidden by law. As for the engendering of stories: that, for me, is a mystery I don’t pretend to understand. I not only don’t know what gives me the idea for a story, I don’t even know whether it’s proper to say that what comes to me is something that might be described as an “idea.” It’s more like a feeling, vague at first, that becomes sharper over time and expresses itself after a while in images and then in oppositions that might develop into protodramas. A murky business, at best. But once a story starts taking shape in my mind, if that’s where it takes place—I think it takes place all over my body—then it’s fed by everything in my experience that can feed it. And part of my experience is a mile-high mass of books, which I sometimes draw on deliberately to create certain effects. I’m reluctant to talk directly about my work, for fear of harming it with deadly explanations that I’m bound to regret, but let me try just a little. When I wrote Edwin Mullhouse, I made use of a number of models, such as Leon Edel’s five-volume biography of Henry James, Nabokov’s Pale Fire and Mann’s Doctor Faustus. But to say that any of those books somehow engendered my own would be, I think, false. My book came from something deeper, more personal, more intimate, more ungraspable, more obscure than other people’s books, though at the same time it was pleased to make use of those books in order to become itself, in order to give birth to itself. Books as midwives—maybe that’s what I mean.

JS: Books as midwives makes sense. But when asking about how much your reading engendered in you, I didn’t so much mean ideas as feelings: so much of your fiction seems to come from deeply personal responses to already-created worlds, to previous stories: Tristan and Isolde’s, or Don Juan’s, to cite the most recent examples. Is that another way of maintaining what you called that discipline of distance?

SM: It’s true that I sometimes make deliberate use of existing stories, though it’s also true that I very often don’t. Insofar as I do, it is, yes, one way of maintaining a necessary distance, for the paradoxical sake of closeness. But I think something else is also at work. When I make use of an existing story, I take pleasure in participating in something beyond myself that is much greater than myself, and equal pleasure in striking a variation. I take pleasure, you might say, in acknowledging the past and then sharply departing from it. And there is something to be said for releasing oneself from the obligations of relentless novelty; a certain kind of insistent originality is nothing but the attempt of mediocrity to appear interesting to itself.

JS: Given your delight in wonders and your interest in the forbidden, does it surprise you that you haven’t taken an even greater interest in monsters? The Lernean Hydra shows up in Don Juan, for example, but it’s a special effect in a theme park.

SM: Legitimate, bona fide monsters do in fact make occasional appearances in my work, but what interests me is something quite different. What interests me—not exclusively, but in relation to the monstrous—is the place where the familiar begins to turn strange. When things cease to be themselves, when they begin to turn into something else, which has no name—that is a region I’m always drawn to. This, I think, accounts for my interest in night scenes, in childhood, in bands of prowling adolescent girls, in underground and attic places, in obsession, in heightened states of awareness. In this sense, it might easily be argued that the wondrous and the monstrous are very much the same. My plan for Mr. Juan was to estrange him from his familiar world of loveless conquest and lead him toward the terrifying world of genuine feeling.

JS: So is the stress on “terrifying” intended to crucially complicate the novella’s overall design as a moral fable? Or would you claim that it has only the shape and not the intent of a moral fable?

SM: If I hear a piece of writing described as a moral fable, my instinct is to head for the hills. I’ll never admit to having written one myself. But let’s say that, by some oversight on my part, a moral fable did slip out. In that case, then yes, the design is crucially complicated through the new discovery of feeling. Don Juan’s fate isn’t to be punished for sin, but to be led—or shall we say initiated?—into human feeling. To put it somewhat differently: In traditional Don Juan stories, the hero is punished by hellfire. Here, his fiery punishment is unrequited love. Meanwhile the underworld becomes, as you wittily put it, only a theme park.

 

___
Book

Steven Millhauser Edwin Mullhouse: The Life and Death of an American Writer 1943-1954 by Jeffrey Cartwright
Vintage

‘Edwin Mullhouse, a novelist at 10, is mysteriously dead at 11. As a memorial, Edwin’s bestfriend, Jeffrey Cartwright, decides that the life of this great American writer must be told. He follows Edwin’s development from his preverbal first noises through his love for comic books to the fulfillment of his literary genius in the remarkable novel, Cartoons.’ — Vintage

 

Excerpt

Behind the rich blue luminous curtain, rippling, the pale blue luminous letters ripple, mingling with bright blue luminous melodies jingling with jujubes, in the black-crow licorice dark. In light, caught, the letters, transfixed, stiffen. Brighter than licked lollipops, livelier than soda in sunlight, lovelier than sunshine on cellophane the colors shine: popsicle orange and lemon-ice white, cotton-candy pink and mint-jelly green, cherry-soda red and raspberry-jello red. Cellophane crackles in the green-and-red-tinted dark. Thick with purple shadows, a dim room appears. In the center stands a vertical ladder, from the top of which a narrow shaft of yellow light falls diagonally down, cutting across one end of a bed and illuminating two round white feet sticking up at the bottom of a blue blanket. A white rabbit, wearing one red nightcap on each tall ear, lies on his back, asleep. As he exhales, with a whistling sound, the blanket under his chin rolls down to his feet. As he inhales, with a snoring sound, the blanket over his feet rolls up to his chin. Over his head a dream appears: he is sawing a log in half. As the saw cuts through the log a piece falls out of the dream and hits him on the head. He sits up, rubbing his head. A red throbbing bump grows higher and higher, pushing up his hand, and then grows lower and disappears. The rabbit yawns and stretches and removes both nightcaps. Putting on a pair of large round black eyeglasses he walks over to a little stove and begins to fry an egg, flipping it up in the air and catching it in his pan. He changes hands, flips it up in the air, and holds out the pan waiting. The egg does not return. Sighing, the rabbit walks over to the ladder and begins to climb.He pokes his head out of his hole into a bright green clearing. In the near distance stand several thin black trees, each with three or four leaves. Beside the hole lies the fried egg. The rabbit picks it up and disappears into his hole. From behind one tree an orange snout with a black nose pops out, followed by a V-shaped frown. In long white eyes, little black pupils move to the left and right. The fox tiptoes quickly to another tree, no thicker than one of his eyebrows, and disappears entirely behind it. His foot peeps out and tiptoes across the grass, followed by his leg, which stretches to twice its length and stops behind another tree; the rest of the fox shoots across to the new tree in an orange blur and disappears behind it. His frowning head peeps out. He looks to the left and right. With hunched shoulders he tiptoes over to the hole. He is orange except for his white toes, his white fingers, and the broad white patch that stretches from the top of his chest to the bottom of his belly. Reaching behind his back, he brings forward a huge red firecracker. He lights the firecracker, pushes it upside down into the hole, and tiptoes a few paces away. With his back to the hole he squeezes his eyes shut and blocks his ears with his fingers. The rabbit flips his egg and holds out the pan. The egg does not return. Frowning. He looks up and sees the firecracker. The egg is speared on the sizzling wick. He climbs the ladder, removes the egg, and pushes the firecracker up out of the hole. The firecracker rolls along the grass and stops behind the fox, who stands with his fingers in his ears. After a while he opens his eyes, removes his fingers from his ears, and turns around. When he sees the sizzling firecracker at his feet his eyes spring out of head an the ends of springs. He dives headfirst onto the grass, landing with a crash and covering his head with his arms. The sizzling wick goes out. The fox looks up. He rises to his feet, walks to the firecracker, picks it up, and smiles. The firecracker explodes. When the smoke clears. The fox is still standing. He is entirely black, except for his white eyes and his white smile. The rabbit sits in a rocking chair by the stove, reading a newspaper. The frying pan is attached to one foot. As he rocks back the egg flips into the air. As he rocks forward the egg falls into the pan. The fox approaches the rabbit hole, pulling a rope attached to a shiny black cannon. He places a shiny black cannonball into the shiny black cannon, tips the front of the cannon into the hole, and lights a wick at the cannon’s back. He turns around, shuts his eyes, and blocks his ears. The front of the cannon swings up, followed by a fried egg, and turns all the way around until it is pointing at the fox. The fried egg goes back into the hole. The fox turns around, sees the cannon, and looks at the audience. The cannon goes off. When the smoke clears, the fox is standing with a hole in his stomach, through which a tree is visible. He reaches down and zips up the hole. Then he collapses onto the grass. A new scene begins on the left, traveling to the right and erasing the old scene. The fox enters pulling a rope tied to the top of a bending tree. He hammers a peg into the ground , ties the rope to a trigger attached to the peg, lays the rope in a circle near the hole, and places inside the circle a bright orange carrot that rests at the end of the trigger. The fox sits down against a nearby tree, crosses his legs, crosses his hands behind his head, closes his eyes, and begins to snore. Above his head a dream appears: he is seated at a table with a napkin tied under his chin and the rabbit bound hand and foot on a plate before him. The rabbit’s head pops out of the hole. He sniffs, adjusts his eyeglasses, and sees the carrot. He climbs out of the hole, steps into the rope-circle, and removes the carrot. Reaching into a pocket in his skin, he removes a leg of roast chicken and places it on the trigger. Crunching on the carrot he steps out of the circle and sees the fox asleep against a tree with a dream over his head. He walks over to the fox, unties the dream-rabbit, who runs away, and puts in its place a huge red firecracker. Then he goes back into his hole. The dream-fox bites into the firecracker, which explodes. The real fox wakes up. He spits out a mouthful of teeth.. In the circle of rope he sees the chicken leg. He walks over to the rim of the circle and frowns down, tapping his foot. As he stares, lines of odor twist from the chicken leg to his twitching black nose. He bends over, reaches toward the chicken leg, and suddenly straightens up. He looks at the audience and shakes his head slyly. Reaching into a pocket he removes a cane. Gently he prods the chicken leg until rolls from the trigger. He flinches, but nothing happens. Shrugging, he picks up the chicken leg. Thrusts it deep into his mouth, and removes a clean white bone. He licks his chops, rubs his belly, and tosses the bone away. It lands on the trigger. The fox’s hair stands on end but nothing happens. Frowning, he pokes the trigger with his cane. Nothing happens. He takes out a sledge hammer and slams the trigger. Nothing happens. He steps inside the rope and kicks the trigger. Nothing happens. As he wipes his forehead with a red handkerchief, a small blue bird flies overhead. A tiny blue feather flutters down. The fox watches the feather as it slowly falls, rocking back and forth, descending past his eyes, his neck, his stomach, his knees. It lands gently on the trigger. The rope yanks the fox into the air and out of sight, accompanied by the sound of a whistling rocket. A distant explosion rocks the forest. The fox enters on the left, leaning on a crutch. One leg is bound in a cast and white bandages cover his head. He sits down beside the rabbit hole and thinks. A lightbulb appears above his head. He reaches up and turns it off. Tearing off his bandages and throwing away the crutch, he removes from his pocket a hammer, nails, and pieces of wood. He begins building furiously, working up a cloud of dust that conceals him completely. When the dust clears a vast blue chute is visible. Beginning in front of the rabbit hole, it rises slowly toward the right on taller and taller posts, passing through the forest where small deer gaze up in wonder, passing over the treetops as an old owl frowns and scratches his head, passing beneath a rainbow into the sky, passing clouds and jagged mountaintops until at last it reaches a tall brown cliff on which a vast boulder rests atop a tiny pebble. Beside the boulder, reclining in a yellow and red lawn chair, wearing green sunglasses and sipping lemonade, is the fox. He picks up a straw, tears one end, and blows the paper wrapper at the boulder. The boulder tips onto the blue chute and starts to roll down. It rolls past clouds and jagged peaks, it frightens a buzzard, it flattens a passing airplane, it snaps apart the rainbow, it roars over treetops past the startled owl, and terrified deer take cover as it thunders past. The rabbit’s head pops out of the hole. Grasping the end of the chute, with a quick motion he bends it upward slightly. Then he ducks out of sight. The boulder follows the curve of the chute and sails into the air, hitting a distant treetop that catches it, bends backwards, and springs forward, flinging the boulder back. The fox is standing on the cliff with his head to one side and one hand cupped over an ear. He removes a watch from his pocket and frowns. As he turns his head to look down, the boulder slams into him, rolling over him and flattening him like dough. For a few moments the fox lies like a colorful shadow. Then one end peels up and he rolls into a tube. His eyes move back and forth in the tube. One leg emerges, one arm, a bushy tail. The fox stands up. Cracks appear in his body and he falls apart with a tinkling sound. The rabbit is lying on his back on the floor, doing sit-ups. He stands up and begins to do quick knee-bends. He lifts a dumbbell over his head. As he begins to skip rope, a sudden crash shakes his house. Frowning, he looks up. The fox, eyes bulging and teeth gnashing, is trapped in the hole at his waist. His arms are pinned to his sides. The rabbit breaks into a smile. Pushing over a small yellow stool, he puts on a pair of boxing gloves and begins to punch the fox’s head as the circle slowly closes.

 

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** Dominik, Hi!!! Agreed. I love early REM when Stipe mumbled and the lyrics sounded like they could be almost anything but increasingly less so when he started articulating like he actually knew something he wanted you to know. Eek, reggae, my least favorite musical form, but I’m sure love pulled that one off because, well, he’s love, he’s the big dude. You won’t be the first, your twisted change is normal, Gossan dirt, whispered to the nodding head, Thrilled you fell apart, instead of them, But they will, ‘cos any hope for love can be killed, If you need a different face, it’s definite time to destroy this place, G. ** Misanthrope, Or maybe one of those fake indoor ski slope joints. Do they have those there? I had a serious boyfriend who was a very bad heroin addict, as I think you know, and he, and surely David, will lie and fuck anyone over to get their dope if they have to, it’s a dead end, and all you can do is try to give them reasons to jump ship. ** _Black_Acrylic, Right, they were considered YBA, and they seem like they’re amongst the few veterans of that moment who aren’t still milking that. That book looks good, indeed. I love looking at books of photos taken back in the early heat of the rave days. Still very charismatic. ** Steve, Yeah, Cave is pretty big over here, or very respected and continually closely attended to at least. I don’t want to talk about the US nightmare here, despite my outburst yesterday, but, yes, good god and holy hell. I didn’t know that about Kane Pixels. How interesting. Yes, curious. ‘The Monkey’, okay, I’ll watch for it, thanks! ** Lucas, Hi. Hm, I remember thinking the ‘Wizard of Oz’ thematic under/overlay and metaphor was pushed way too hard in ‘WaH’ and that robbed the film of the eeriness that I like so much in most of Lynch’s stuff. But there are great sequences. Continued anti-smoking luck. I always dreamt about inadvertently smoking cigs in the years when I quit, when I could rarely remember my dreams anyway. Okay, twenty days to go. That sucks, but you can tough it out, you’re tough, tougher than you maybe know, pal. ** Jack Skelley, Ho! Lucky you. Mine is presumably scrunched in the dreadful French postal system somewhere. That reminds me that I need to tell Ruben that if wants a blog thing he better send me the post stuff soon. Enjoy paging. ** Steeqhen, Hi. Everything good eventually dies while being eaten by cheap copy maggots, I guess. Anyway, your wordage and guesswork re: Analog Horror made much sense. Analog horror will survive because true artists interested in making horror will always gravitate there the same way the truest filmmakers stick to affordable budgets. I love ‘Skinamarink’. It was my favorite film of the year it came out. It gave me a lot of hope. Thanks for the ‘Rodge and Podge’ link. I’ll watch it as soon as I get a 1 1/2 hours. Shouldn’t be too far ahead. I don’t want to talk about the US stuff anymore, at least for the moment, but yeah. If you want me to review your thing, I’m happy to. Do keep in mind that one of DH’s inaccuracies are his claims that Patti Smith had anything to do with what was going on at Beyond Baroque or with me and that she and I were friends because we never were. I’m not sure where he got all those mistaken ideas. Photo shoot sounds to have been invigorating. Is there a more boring actor in the world than Bradley Cooper? I wonder. Enjoyable, yes, taxing, no. xo. ** James, Once again you spoil the blog with your beady, discerning eyes and connected pen strokes. *bowing* (Not easy when you’re sitting at a desk. Well, it’s actually a table, not a desk). Give me the stench of weed over the clouds of beer-y burps. But I was a teenaged hippie. Ah, youth and how it gets wedded to its musical landscape. I have the new GbV on my hard drive and ready to compress into my earphones and spread joy throughout my biology this very morning. Listening to ‘New Day Rising’ would only be good for you. Plus I think it’s Husker Du’s highpoint. ** Chris Kelso, Haha, nah. The producers who made ‘Coraline’ and subsequent films optioned ‘God Jr’ for about ten years, and I was excited about that, actually, but it never happened. But ‘God Jr’ is being adapted into a graphic novel by an excellent French graphic novelist right now, and I’m excited about that. The pure hell of getting ‘Room Temperature’ to the finish line taught Zac and me a lot about what not to do next time, like not making a film that costs that much to make ever again, for one thing. But no. Making ‘PGL’ and ‘LCTG’ weren’t bad experiences, so, with the new film we’re writing, we’ll try to go back to making films that way if we can. The main worry is being able to have a roomy shooting time like we did with ‘RT’. We think there must a way. Because shooting ‘PGL’ in two weeks, which we had to do, was so difficult. Do you have any idea of how long you’ll have to shoot? I did know The Backrooms games, yeah. Nice. I knew Joel Lane. I blurbed his first novel. We were both Serpents Tail authors. Very interesting guy. So sad. You stay well as well! ** PL, The ‘Sluts’ cover is nothing. It’s like a gay greeting card. Yes, ‘The Sluts’ was originally published as a limited edition, illustrated book by Void Books. Cover. That version of the book looks beautiful. Great artists can be minimalists or maximalists. I don’t agree with Matt on that. ‘Emilia Perez’ seems dreadful, so I’m avoiding it. I’m curious about ‘Anora’, but I think I’ll dislike it. My pal Zac thought it was awful, and we tend to agree on films. But I hope they’re both super swell for your sake. ** Dan Carroll, Hi. Well, I’m, like, old, and I like analog horror but maybe it reminds me of cheaply made horror movies from my childhood or something. I love ‘Skinamarink.’ It’s a role model. Thanks for reading ‘MLT’. Hm, I haven’t reread it in a long time, and I don’t think I remember what movie scene I was writing about unless it’s from ‘River’s Edge’ maybe? Huh, I’ll go find a copy and try to figure that out. It was probably a real movie, yes. That makes sense: the crowd effect on your viewing experience. Do you like ‘Devil’s Rejects’? I like that Zombie movie too. But those are his only two films I like much at all, I think. ** Tyler Ookami, I did see ‘I Saw the TV Glow’, and I liked it pretty much, yes. I’m glad I waited until all the hype wasn’t present anymore. I don’t know ‘Y2K’, but I’ll search it out, thanks. It sounds like it bears enough fruit to be committed to. Oh, the 2010s, The Strokes, MGMT, Yeah Yeah Yeahs, etc., okay, that era. I get kind of blurry about what occurred when. Indie landfill is a good term. Rarefilmm I know, yeah, it’s terrific. I actually don’t know the other two, so thank you a lot! Bon day to you. ** HaRpEr, Nice, the instructional video. And ‘Pipergate’, whoa, I’ll get on that. They must be hiding somewhere. Thanks for the alert, pal. Fantastic about making a film for the class! That’s really exciting. Let me know how it goes, obviously. Fuck the lowkey sadistic lecturer. Being embarrassed in front of a class is a special kind of wounding. One time in high school this boy, straight-attempting but clearly closeted, sitting at the desk in front of mine had a little ripped hole in the seat of his jeans, and he saw me looking at it, and he loudly announced, ‘I bet you want to put your finger in there don’t you, Cooper?’ And everyone laughed. But I was in some strangely alert mood, so I said, ‘Not as much as you want me to put it in there, Scott’, and that got even huger laugh from the other students, and I think that was probably some massive traumatic moment in his life, and I felt bad afterwards, but not very bad. ** Florian S. Fauna, Hey! Thanks, Florian. Yes, you certainly have that I know of. Yes, I just got the book in the mail yesterday, and I haven’t started reading it yet, but it looks great. Exciting! I’m good, finishing our film and writing the next one mostly. All good. Good luck with your deadlines. ** nat, Hey, natttttt. That doesn’t work so well with ‘t’ ending name, sadly. Is that true about single authored things being more appealing than collaborative things? Hm, I can see that, I guess, thinking about it. I do recall that project of yours, yes. If that thing you’re making with your friend gets out sneak me a link or directive or something. Cool you’re reading ‘CODON’. Nice. That press, Calamari, is a great press, always does fascinating things. What are you picking up, writerly-wise, from The Bible. I’ve never read it, oops. If you have to be gifted with an ass, you could have done worse, for sure. It seems like a hit. Why wouldn’t it be? ** Charalampos, Thanks. There’s an ‘RT’ teaser trailer, and I think it’ll get released at the same time the premiere date/location is announced. ** Justin D, Hair is so reliable until it starts falling out. Then I guess the falling out part becomes the reliable aspect. I hate small talk. I can do it if I have to, but it works my nerves. I like to try to kill it by asking the person something deep and serious. But sometimes they secretly want to tell you all about their inner depths, and your question pulls the finger out of the hole in their dam, that can be even worse. My day … Zac and I finally had a big talk about the new film script and decided to make a big change in it, so that was exciting because that means now we’re heading into the meat of the thing and the finish line has begun to appear however distantly. Otherwise, just email and stuff. How was your … what is today … Friday? ** Uday, I don’t know, if academia is intimated by you, that’s a plus, isn’t it? I know little about academia, as I probably just proved. Thank you. Dude, it’s gif with hard ‘g’. Sorry, it just is, haha. I wear my clothes loose due to my fabric/dye allergy, but I’ll try tightening them a little and see what happens. Based on the looks of a lot of famous people who seem to accrue groupies, I think you have to be right. ** Right. Today I am reviving the spotlight that I had earlier aimed at one of my all-time very favorite novels, so of course I hope you see the spotlight’s beam as an enticing entrance. See you tomorrow.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 DC's

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑