The blog of author Dennis Cooper

Author: DC (Page 20 of 1085)

30 Downtown New York Performance Artists (1980s – early 90s)

 

‘In the decade between 1978 and 1988, over ten new nightclub-performance venues opened in the twelve square blocks comprising New York City’s East Village, providing nightly entertainment for and by a community of young artists. Attempting to convey the flurry of artistic activity, critics mythologized downtown as the “Elysian fields,” the scene as “phenomenal,” spoke of its “aura” and “mystical vitality,” but eschewed any nuanced understanding of the political, economic, and social forces at play in its construction. Even with the benefit of hindsight, little critical headway has been made in assessing why such a scene developed and the type of performances that resulted, beyond citing record numbers of art school graduates and cheap rents. Most art historical attention on downtown art in the 1980s has focused on neo-expressionist painting, graffiti art, and alternative spaces, but there has been scant analysis of performance’s central role in the development of the scene and its market, let alone of the works themselves.

‘By the late 1970s, however, it became increasingly evident that performance was the connective glue of the downtown community. Nightclub performances were crucial in the construction of this community, creating a marketplace for the production and consumption of new cultural content. The work was characteristically entertaining (prop-filled, bizarre, and hilarious) and developed in tandem with a downtown performance community built on shared (and pleasurable) social, symbolic, and economic exchanges between performer and audience. In search of growth through wider audiences, this new style of campy and flamboyant performance art begun in nightclubs, and its market continued to expand with performers moving into large concert hall venues like the Brooklyn Academy of Music (BAM) and eventually onto cable television.

‘Exposing the long-ignored economics of performance art, this dissertation argues that between the emergence of punk and the art market boom of the 1980s, performance found a way to create and profit from a market economy, despite the medium’s ephemerality. This goes against the two dominant and polarized interpretations of this work.On the one hand is the claim that the work is unabashedly complicit with big capital and therefore with the gentrification of downtown. On the other hand is the belief that downtown performances parodied the market, accruing symbolic capital within a ‘restricted field,’ which by the mid-1980s was usurped by real capital (as evidenced by the rise of the art market and ‘crossover’ acts like Laurie Anderson, Ann Magnuson, and Eric Bogosian). Certainly, these performers accrued symbolic capital; however, I contend that they were never operating within a ‘restricted’ field, but rather consciously maneuvering to create an unprecedented market for performance. Thus, the growth of performance in the 1980s owes its success to neither ‘selling out’ nor subversion, but rather to the entrepreneurial creation of what I call a ‘market-community,’ a community constituted by shared practices of production and consumption, and emblematic of the larger economic shift towards affective and immaterial labor in our post-Fordist service economy. Indeed, one can neither sell-out in nor subvert the market one produces, sells, and consumes.’ — Meredith Mowder

 

____________
Selected venues

The Kitchen
Performance Space 122
Franklin Furnace
Dixon Place
Danspace
Dance Theater Workshop
The Performing Garage
La MaMa Experimental Theatre
8BC
The Pyramid
Club 57
King Tut’s Wah-Wah Hut
Chandalier
Darinka

 

________________________
10 DPAs who became very famous

Steve Buscemi
Whoopie Goldberg
Willem Dafoe
Blue Man Group
Jill Clayburgh
Spaulding Gray
They Might Be Giants
Laurie Anderson
Eric Bogosian
Frances McDormand

 

____________
Further reading

* C. Carr On Edge: Performance at the End of the Twentieth Century (Wesleyan, 1993)
*
Roselee Goldberg Performance: Live Art Since 1960 (Harry N. Abrams, 1998)
*
Brandon Stosuy Up Is Up, But So Is Down: New York’s Downtown Literary Scene, 1974-1992 (NYU Press, 2006)
*
Marvin Taylor The Downtown Book: The New York Art Scene 1974-1984 (Princeton University Press, 2005)

 

___
15

____________

Dancenoise
‘The Dancenoise performance art duo of Anne Iobst and Lucy Sexton pull viewers into a world of nightmare dreams and hilarious apocalyptic visions through which the two women travel with friendly, deadpan objectivity. A good deal of the fun lies in the agonizingly slow vaudevillian buildups to fleeting jokes and barbs. The topics include women’s reproductive rights and the Persian Gulf war. The jokes are surprisingly fresh and devastating, and the gentler moments of affection as touching. A good deal of Dancenoise’s impact comes from the scrappily imaginative, sometimes beautiful set elements they work with.’ — Jennifer Dunning, NYT, 1991


Dancenoise at The Pyramid Club’s 7th Birthday Party

 

____________

John Kelly
‘John Kelly is a performance and visual artist has created over 30 performance works which have been performed at many performance and alternative venues, including The Tate Modern, The Kitchen, PS 1, The Warhol Museum, the Whitney Biennial, Dance Theater Workshop, The Sundance Theatre Lab, The Drawing Center, LaMaMa ETC, Creative Time, Performance Space 122, and the Brooklyn Academy of Music’s Next Wave Festival. His performance works have consistently focused on the character of creative genius, and have ranged from the autobiographical to historic figures such as the Viennese Expressionist artist Egon Schiele, Caravaggio, Antonin Artaud, Joni Mitchell, and Jean Cocteau, as well as cultural phenomenon such as the Berlin Wall, the Troubadours, the AIDS epidemic, and Expressionistic Film.’ — John Kelly Website


“The Dagmar Onassis Story” (excerpt)

 

____________

David Leslie
‘I have been creating public spectacle as an artist / daredevil in the cultural arena of performance art in NYC art houses and club venues since the mid eighties. My addiction for art and adrenaline drove me to my first stunt in SOHO, when I attempted to fly a small single seat rocket over a mountain over watermelons. That night I almost broke my neck and was nearly burned alive in the flaming wreckage. I loved it. Throughout the mid to late eighties I offered up many outrageous acts and actions mostly in admiration, imitation and respect for of the men and women who inspired me. My over the top outrageous acts were in simpatico with a temperament that was pervasive in the East Village at that time. My over the top outrageous act were a in simpatico with a temperament that was pervasive then in that East Village. My fans and followers of my work named me “The Impact Addict”. I was given that name after doing a show that I had titled “impact addict”. In that show I jumped off a 3 story building onto a sheet of steel while wrapped in bubble wrap and christmas lights .. and the name stuck.’ — David Leslie


MTV News Story: David ‘The Impact Addict’ Leslie

 

____________

Yoshiko Chuma
‘The School of Hard Knocks, more fully titled “Yoshiko Chuma & The School of Hard Knocks,” was founded in 1982 and is located in New York. Described in 2007 by Bloomberg as “a fixture on New York’s downtown scene for over a quarter- century”, her work spans from early “absurdist gaiety” to more recent serious reflection, which nevertheless represents the “maverick imagination and crazy-quilt multimedia work” for which the artist is known. Dance commentators have found her work difficult to classify; in a 2006 profile, Dance Magazine speculated that “One might call her a postmodern choreographer, a movement designer, or a visual artist whose primary medium is human beings–dancers, musicians, pedestrians”.’ — Wikipedia


Excerpts from ‘Dead End Falling – Secret Journey’

 

_____________

John Sex
‘After early work as a gay stripper, John Sex became an alternative performance artist, creating a character based on an exaggerated, cheesy Las Vegas lounge singer/MC. Sex developed a persona that simultaniously masked and amplified his polymorphous self, elaborating a mythinc yet parodic rock-star figure of mercurial presence”. His “Acts of Live Art” series brought performance art into the club context. He was able to further refine the combination of performance art, drag act, gay go-go dancer, cabaret singer, lounge MC, etc. as a performance art dancer who performed at such legendary New York clubs as Club 57, the Pyramid Club, Danceteria, The Palladium, Paradise Garage and Andy Warhol’s Underground. Mr. Sex’s trademark was his long, blond hair which stood straight up, and which he claimed was kept erect by a combination of Dippity-do, Aqua Net, egg whites, beer, and semen. He also dressed in flamboyant costumes. He owned a python named Delilah that was often included in his cabaret act, and was a friend of artist Andy Warhol. Sometimes he would leave the python on stage and come down into the audience and wrestle with patrons of the club. He died from AIDS-related complications.’ — Steven Hager


“Rock Your Body”

 

____________

Robert Whitman
‘Robert Whitman is best known for his seminal theater pieces combining visual and sound images, actors, film, slides, and evocative props in environments of his own making. Since the late 1960s he has worked with new technologies, and his most recent work incorporates cellphones. He has collaborated with engineers on installations and works that incorporate new technology: laser sculptures, including Solid Red Line, in which a red line draws itself around the walls of a room and then erases itself. In 2003, Dia Art Foundation, New York presented, Playback, a large-scale retrospective exhibition of Whitman’s works. The exhibition traveled to Porto, Portugal, and opened at the Museum of Contemporary Art in Barcelona in September 2005. A major book, Playback, a comprehensive study of his work, accompanies this exhibition.’ — The Pace Gallery


from ‘Inside Out’

 

____________

Tom Murrin
‘Tom Murrin began performing under the name “Tom Trash” in the late 70s, doing street shows, but also getting gigs in rock clubs, opening for the bands. The punk scene was just starting at that time in New York, and his brand of theater was considered “punk”. In 1979, he changed his name to The Alien Comic. During the early ’80’s, Murrin also did shows at the off-off Broadway theaters, like La Mama and Theater for the New City, and opened for many bands, including X, Pere Ubu, the Stranglers, and James Brown. In the early ’80’s Murrin met a group of women dancers who had recently graduated from Ohio University, in Athens, Ohio, who were then living in Manhattan. They were Jo Andres, Mimi Goese, Lucy Sexton and Annie Iobst, and they were interested in performing. Murrin taught Sexton and Iobst what he had learned along the way, and the two women became DANCENOISE. The five became The Full Moon Crew, and with the production help of Bill Schaffner, they put on many Full Moon Shows at P.S. 122. In May, 2008, Murrin was honored by P.S. 122, along with his friend, producer/stage technician Lori E. Seid, at their annual Spring Gala and Benefit at Angel Orensanz Foundation.’ — Alien Comic Website


Tom Murrin (Alien Comic)

 

____________

Ann Magnuson
‘In 1978, Ann Magnuson moved to New York City, New York and was a DJ and performer at Club 57 and the Mudd Club in Manhattan circa 1979 through the early 1980s, while pursuing a performance career on varied fronts. She created such characters as “Anoushka”, a Soviet lounge singer, wearing a wig backwards and singing mock-Russian lyrics to pop music standards, and separately sang in an all-girl percussion group, Pulsallama, whose 1982 single “The Devil Lives In My Husband’s Body” was a housewife’s lament of a spouse who appears to be possessed. Later, in the 1990s, Magnuson fronted the satirical faux-heavy metal band Vulcan Death Grip. In the late ’70s and early ’80s, Magnuson ran Club 57, in New York City’s East Village. The club was located in the basement of the Polish National church. It became a center of a world that included Keith Haring, Kenny Scharf, and many others from New York’s budding graffiti and downtown scenes.’ — Art in America


from ‘Made for TV’

 

____________

John Jesurun
‘John Jesurun, a winner of the MacArthur “Genius” Fellowship in 1996, is widely acknowledged as one of the foremost innovators of avant-garde theater, creating virtuoso works that overlap media and language in surprising and unpredictable ways. His works play with various media forms, pop-cultural constructs and entertainment genres. The construction is as important as the text. It is converged by the influence of film, television and radio rather than by theatrical convention. Scenes begin and end abruptly, as if cut and spliced together. Camera effects are replicated: actors are frequently suspended on platforms in various configurations to suggest overhead shots, long shots, and shots from below. Stagings have included helicopter rescues, sailboat races, a floating saxophone, car crashes and chases.’ — MacArthur Foundation


SUNSPOT(1989)

 

____________

Karen Finley
‘Karen Finley is an innovative and controversial New York based performance artist/literary figure/visual artist. She has created countless installations, drawings, performances, and public sculptures all over the world. Many of her works deal with the issues of violence against women, emotional despair, a sense of loss, and abuse. During her performances she often goes into a trancelike voice and verbally juggles different characters and voices. At the end of her shows, she often takes off her clothes and smears herself with chocolate or other substances. Finely gained much notoriety for her show,”We Keep Our Victims Ready.” “The show made her run afoul of Senator Jessie Helms who used her performances as a focal point for a movement to eliminate the NEA. When her NEA grant application was rejected for inappropriate content she challenged the ruling. She took the case all the way to the Supreme Court along with fellow artists, Holly Hughes, John Fleck, and Tim Miller. The artists lost the case.’ — Vittorio Carli, artinterviews


“I’m An Ass Man” performed at Limelight NYC

 

____________

Ethyl Eichelberger
‘Ethyl Eichelberger often performed solo works in free verse based on the lives of the grand dames of history, including Lucrezia Borgia, Jocasta, Medea, Lola Montez, Nefertiti, Clytemnestra, and Carlotta, Empress of Mexico. “I wanted to play the great roles but who would cast me as Medea?”, he mused late in life in Extreme Exposure: An Anthology of Solo Performance Texts from the Twentieth Century. His 1984 play Leer distilled Shakespears’s King Lear into 3 characters, all played by Eichelberger. Such works are rarely revived, as they require a solo performer capable of accompanying himself on the accordion, eating fire, turning cartwheels, and doing splits and other acrobatic feats. He was diagnosed with AIDS and was unable to tolerate the available medications. Only after his suicide did it become widely known that he was ill.’ — Joe E. Jeffreys


from ‘Minnie the Maid’

 

______________

Jeff Weiss
‘Anyone who has visited Good Medicine & Company on East 10th Street over the last fifteen years knows something about theater that many people are just now discovering. Sometimes, before a show, there might be instant shopping expeditions to neighboring bodegas. Always there was red wine, fruit. Often you found yourself on stage, pinpointed, a part of the energy of the evening. All this at close quarters. In that small space audiences experienced a total immersion in their own darker consciousness through the vehicle of Jeff Weiss and Carlos Ricardo Martinez. Suddenly, total darkness, then a candle, a flashlight, or a bare light bulb and then—total theater.’ — Bill Rice, Bomb, 1984


Portrait of the Artist: Jeff Weiss

 

_____________

The Wooster Group
‘The Wooster Group evolved from a small group of people in 1975 who made the trilogy, THREE PLACES IN RHODE ISLAND, around the autobiographical impulses of Spalding Gray. That group included Gray, Elizabeth LeCompte, and Jim Clayburgh. Ron Vawter began performing with the company in RUMSTICK ROAD and Willem Dafoe joined during the making of NAYATT SCHOOL. Kate Valk began working with the Group during POINT JUDITH and Peyton Smith joined for ROUTE 1 & 9. The Group has sustained a full-time, ongoing ensemble since this beginning. The company is constantly evolving, and with its many artistic associates has created and performed nineteen pieces for theater, eight film/video pieces, and five dance pieces. The company members are at the center of the work. Elizabeth LeCompte has directed all of the pieces and members who have “moved on” periodically return to remount repertory pieces and make new work. ‘ — Thewoostergroup.org


from ‘LSD’

 

______________

Eiko & Koma
‘Eiko Otake and Takashi Koma Otake, generally known as Eiko & Koma, are a Japanese performance duo. Since 1972, Eiko & Koma have worked as co-artistic directors, choreographers, and performers, creating a unique theater of movement out of stillness, shape, light, sound, and time. For most of their multi-disciplinary works, Eiko & Koma also create their own sets and costumes, and they are usually the sole performers in their work. Neither of them studied traditional Japanese dance or theater forms and prefer to choreograph and perform only their own works. They do not bill their work as Butoh though Eiko & Koma cite Kazuo Ohno (a Butoh pioneer) as their main inspiration.’ — Village Voice


‘River’

 

____________

Joey Arias
‘Born in Fayetteville, North Carolina, Joey Arias moved to New York City as a teenager and eventually got a job at the Fiorucci designer clothing store. While working at the store he became friends with alternative icon Klaus Nomi, singing backup and designing Nomi’s sets and costumes. Arias gradually became involved in the burgeoning 1980s New York performance art scene, appearing regularly at Club 57 and other downtown venues. During these years he also began crafting a successful career in cabaret, based on his talent for channeling the vocal style and mannerisms of the legendary Billie Holiday. His most recent work was performing in Arias with a Twist, a collaboration with puppeteer Basil Twist, and before that as the Mistress of Seduction in the Las Vegas show Zumanity, an “adult-themed” Cirque du Soleil show running at the New York-New York Hotel & Casino.’ — Wikipedia


1988 TV interview & video clip


Joey Arias & Dean Johnson in the dressing room at Limelight

 

______________

Tim Miller
‘Since moving to New York at the age of 19 to pursue his interests in art and performance, Miller has not only been presenting his own work but also facilitating the development and presentation of other artists’ work. At 21, he became part of the small group that founded one of New York’s most important alternative performance spaces, PS122. Later, when he moved back to his home state of California in the early 1990s, he helped found yet another alternative space in Los Angeles, Highways.’ — Hyperallergic

(more)


My Queer Body (1992)

 

______________

Ishmael Houston-Jones
‘Ishmael Houston-Jones started dancing in the abandoned NYC Public School 122 in 1979; using the newly formed weekly Open Movement nights to meet collaborators, dancers, friends, and lovers. Ishmael and a band of like-minded art rebels that included Yvonne Meier, Stephanie Skura, Stephanie Doba, Frank Conversano, Fred Holland, Jennifer Miller, Robin Epstein, Mark Russell, John Bernd (RIP) as well as directors Charles Dennis, Tim Miller, Peter Rose and Moulton formed the early informal core of what became Performance Space 122. As a choreographer and performer Ishmael Houston-Jones’ early work used movement and text to address issues of race, sexuality, and the AIDS crisis. Houston-Jones and Fred Holland shared a New York Dance and Performance “Bessie Award” for their Cowboys, Dreams and Ladders. Works Houston-Jones premiered at Performance Space 122 include: THEM and Knife/Tape/Rope, both of which were collaborations with novelist Dennis Cooper. He also appeared at Performance Space 122 in the work of Holland, Meier, Bernd, Cathy Weis, DD Dorvillier, Terry Fox, Rotozaza and DANCENOISE. As a teacher at the American Dance Festival, The Eugene Lang College at the New School, the Center for New Dance Development in Holland, and many other schools and festivals, Houston Jones has nurtured continuing generations of radical dance makers.’ — Broadway World

(more)


Fred Holland & Ishmael Houston-Jones, 1983

 

______________

Penny Arcade
‘Penny Arcade Aka Susana Ventura is an internationally respected performance artist, writer , poet and experimental theatre maker known for her magnetic stage presence, her take no prisoners wit and her content rich plays and one liners. She is the author of ten scripted performance plays and hundreds of performance art pieces. Her work has always focused on the other and the outsider, giving voice to those marginalized by society. Her willingness to speak truth to power at the expense of career concerns has made her an international icon of artistic resistance. Her decades long focus on the creation of community and inclusion as the goals of performance and her efforts to use performance as a transformative act mark her as a true original in American theatre and performance.’ — pa.tv

(more)


excerpt from Penny Arcade’s “True Stories”

 

_____________

Tehching Hsieh
‘The performance artist Tehching Hsieh has isolated himself in a barren, caged room, making no contact with the outside world; lived and slept on the streets of New York, avoiding any form of shelter; and tied himself to fellow artist Linda Montano with a rope—each piece lasting for an entire year. (“Life is a life sentence; life is passing time, life is free thinking,” he has said, suggesting the stoic philosophy that guided these radical, time-based performances and others of the late 1970s through the ’90s.) Yet, despite having undergone these extraordinary performative endurance tests, Hsieh is often excluded from major texts on conceptual and performance art and, strangely, remained relatively unknown until he quit making art altogether.’ — artsy.net

(more)


Outside Again is a short documentary on Tehching Hsieh’s performances

 

______________

Carmelita Tropicana
‘Carmelita Tropicana has been performing in New York’s downtown arts scene since the 1980s, straddling the worlds of performance art and theater in the U.S., Latin America and Europe with her irreverent humor, subversive fantasy and bilingual puns. She received an Obie for Sustained Excellence in Performance (1999) and is a recipient of the Performance and Activism Award from the Women in Theater Program / American Theater in Higher Education (2015). Notable and recent works include: Schwanze-Beast (2015), a performance commissioned by Vermont Performance Lab; Recycling Atlantis (2014), a performance installation at 80WSE Gallery; Post Plastica (2012), an installation/video and performance presented at El Museo del Barrio; and the highly anthologized Milk of Amnesia (1994). Her publications include the book, co-edited with Holly Hughes, Memories of the Revolution: The First Ten Years of the WOW Café (University of Michigan Press, 2015). Tropicana has taught at numerous universities and sits on the Board of Directors at Performance Space 122 and NYFA.’ — ct.com

(more)


Carmelita Tropicana Sample

 

______________

Pat Oleszko
‘Performance artist Pat Oleszko makes a spectacle of herself—and doesn’t mind if you laugh. With elaborate handmade costumes and props, she utilizes the body as armature for ideas in an array of lampoons that call her audience to action. From the personal to the political, her performances and installations ceremoniously exorcize through humor. Hoisting an enormous burning bra on the exterior of the Women’s Studies Research Center, the exhibition Fool for Thought highlights costumes and performances from a wild variety of events including Hello Folly: The Floes & Cons of Arctic Drilling, Oldilocks and the Bewares, Stalking Walking Topiary and The Pat and the Hats. Oleszko, self-identified as the Fool in question and the questioning Fool, fans the flames with rousing absurdity and maintains that she who laughs, lasts.’ — brandeis.edu

(more)


Four/Shortened Works

 

_____________

Hapi Phace
What ever happened to Hapi Phace? The drag queen from the 80s – yes, in NYC. Anyone know? Is s/he till in NYC? I used to think Hapi Phace was hilarious. Lives with a doctor on an old farmhouse in Sharon Springs now. Hapi Phace moved to Boston a few years ago. Well, if anyone knows him…tell him someone in NY misses him!

(more)


Hapi Phace does her Comedy Monologue at The Pyramid Club

 

______________

Eric Bogosian
‘Bogosian is an author and actor known for his plays Talk Radio and subUrbia as well as numerous one-man shows. Between 1980 and 2000, six major solos written and performed by Eric Bogosian were produced Off-Broadway, garnering him three Obie Awards as well as the Drama Desk award. His first two solos, Men Inside and funHouse were presented at the New York Shakespeare Festival. His third, Drinking in America, was produced by American Place Theater. Sex, Drugs, Rock & Roll, Pounding Nails in the Floor with My Forehead and Wake Up and Smell the Coffee were all produced commercially Off-Broadway by Frederick Zollo. In addition to Bogosian’s touring the United States and Europe, the solos have been produced featuring other actors in Argentina, Brazil, Italy and Poland.’ — collaged

(more)


Eric Bogosian “Medicine” (1994)

 

______________

Spalding Gray
‘Spalding Gray detailed the minutiae of his neuroses, fears, experiences, and desires through his cutting and dry self-deprecating humor. An actor, playwright, and novelist, Gray came into his own with the 1987 film adaptation of his monologue Swimming to Cambodia. The spare set included Gray sitting at a table with a pitcher of water and a drinking glass with a map of Cambodia behind him while he detailed parts of his personal history with a history of the Khmer Rouge and its impact on the people of Cambodia. Author Francine Prose described the power of Gray’s monologues to Bruce Weber of the New York Times, “He transformed darkness into dark comedy.”‘ — EoWB

(more)


Terrors of Pleasure (1988)

 

_____________

Alexis del Lago
‘A short documentary, directed by Craig Calman and alternately called He Made Herself a Star, is a marvelous peek into the bygone world of a quietly fading goddess. The ever-alluring drag legend Alexis Del Lago has been beguiling clubgoers for decades. I remember meeting her in the ’80s and even then she seemed a dazzling relic from an earlier age. Here she talks (in a sadly faltering voice) about Warhol and Mapplethorpe (whom she found “tacky”) and shows us the pictures of an incredible life lived to the fullest, on the furthest edges of society. This is our LGBT history,people, and Alexis is a living monument to our culture.’ — WOW

(more)


The Exotic Queen Alexis del Lago at the Pyramid Club NYC 1980s

 

______________

John Bernd
‘In the early 80s, the yet to be named AIDS epidemic was decimating the New York and San Francisco’s large gay male populations. The dance and theater worlds in were particularly hard hit and for the next decade untold numbers of artists were lost until the effective anti-viral medications became widely available in the mid-90s. Among them choreographer John Bernd, who died in 1988 at age 35. Bernd had worked with such dance luminaries as Merce Cunningham and Twyla Tharp, as well as collaborating with other legendary artists from other fields. Bernd founded the improvisational collective Open Movement in Performance Space 122. He received a Bessie Award in 1978 and in 1986, two years before his death, prestigious New York Dance and Performance Award. He was at the height of his creative powers, as a dancer, choreographer, composer and interdisciplinary visual artist.’ — The Dance Journal

(more)


TELL ME MOVING (1985)

 

_______________

Holly Hughes
‘Holly Hughes is an internationally acclaimed performance artist whose work maps the troubled fault lines of identity. Her combination of poetic imagery and political satire has earned her wide attention and placed her work at the center of America’s culture wars. Hughes was among the first students to attend The New York Feminist Art Institute, an experiment in progressive pedagogy launched by members of the Heresies Collective. While there, she worked with feminist artists such as Miriam Schapiro and Mary Beth Edelson and participated in performance work at A.I.R. gallery. In the early ’80s, Hughes became part of the Women’s One World Café, also known as the WOW Café, an arts cooperative in the East Village established by an international group of women artists. As the Village gradually became a magnet for the avant-garde art world, WOW served as an incubator for a generation of artists.’ — STAMPS

(more)


The Dog and Pony Show (Bring Your Own Pony)

 

______________

Ralph Lemon
‘Much of Lemon’s success is attributed to his unique ability to express dramatic and emotional content through movement using new art forms. Ralph Lemon is currently the artistic director of Cross Performance Inc. in New York. Lemon strives to invent and be innovative with each performance he creates by conveying different concepts and using different media. The core of Ralph Lemon’s style in his earlier works was atmospherically showcased with strong costumes and props to visually help the audience understand the narrative. By the early 1990s he strayed away from a theatrical style to a more movement oriented style by focusing on the body. Ralph Lemon uses both his art and anthropology backgrounds to influence his choreography, but he refrains from distorting the cultural importance of dance within traditions.’ — collaged

(more)


Talking Dance (1997)

 

______________

Frank Maya
‘Maya was part of John Jesurun’s legendary serial theater piece, Chang in a Void Moon, when it premiered at the Pyramid Club in 1982. His music performances had always verged on theater with interludes of acerbic monologues he called rants. In the mid- 1980s, he began focusing more on his rants, joining a growing cadre of solo performers such as Spalding Grey, Eric Bogosian, and Karen Finley, who were similarly examining American society through a personal lens. He created three hour- long solo performances that tackled pop culture, gender issues, and the mundanity of existence. Thirty years before the current outcry over the lack of minorities in mainstream media, Maya was commenting, “There’s a few movies like Cotton Club where they take all the black actors who’ve been out of work for ten years and put them in the same film… People say, ‘See we’re making progress.’” His acclaimed shows were performed at P.S. 122, La Mama, Dixon Place, the Kitchen, and Lincoln Center’s Serious Fun series. He also toured the mid-Atlantic states and performed in Germany.’ — Vaudevisuals

(more)


Recorded at La Mama Theatre on April 20, 1987

 

______________

Mabou Mines
‘The company began as a resident company at Ellen Stewart’s La MaMa Experimental Theatre Club in the East Village. In 1986, the company won an Obie Award for Sustained Excellence for its theatrical contributions to the Off-Broadway community. As the company stated in a 1990 press kit, “The artistic purpose of Mabou Mines has been and remains the creation of new theatre pieces from original texts and the theatrical use of existing texts staged from a specific point of view. Each member is encouraged to pursue his or her artistic vision by initiating and collaborating on a wide range of projects of varying styles, developing them from initial concept to final performance. This process is intense and often lengthy. While the director of a Mabou Mines work is responsible for its concept and its basic structure, the ultimate production reflects the concerns and the artistic input of all its collaborators.”‘ — collaged

(more)


an excerpt of Mabou Mine’s “Lucia’s Chapters of Coming Forth by Day”

 

______________

Lady Bunny
‘A fixture of New York night life since the early 1980s, when she moved from Atlanta with her pal RuPaul, Lady Bunny is arguably the city’s reigning drag queen, less a mother hen than a queen bee with plenty of sting. Her signature look — big curves, bigger hair — has endured, as has her act: scowling, spiky comedy, laced with political jabs and honeyed with Southern-fried gregariousness. And while much has changed in L.G.B.T. life over the past 17 years (gay marriage, PrEP, Caitlyn Jenner and “RuPaul’s Drag Race”), Lady Bunny retains the rude and crude spirit that has eroded over the decades, both from downtown Manhattan and from drag itself, now that “Drag Race” has minted a new crop of camera-ready stars.’ — NY Times

(more)


Werq the World

 

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** James, True. And true again. I agree with almost everything you wrote, and your enthusiasm for the post would be highly infectious if I wasn’t already enthusiastic. An A! And a scraped A! There’s at least one Swedish regular on this blog, so you’ve at least rubbed texts with one. Mozzarella sticks are so good they’re almost sentient. I’ve never been called a faggot. I feel kind of sad about that. I hope you really enjoyed that shave. ** jay, Leve also loved the great Joe Brainard and kind of kick started a Brainard cult over here. Excellent question about that online site. It’d be so nice to put the fear of god into the crystals believing set. So your boyfriend has at least a bit of an edge, at least in theory. My weekend didn’t storm at all. It just dripped occasionally. ** PL, Hi. I haven’t had the chance to delve into your portfolio yet, but I look forward to it. ** Steeqhen, Hey. One of Zac’s and my future plans to make a film with this great sound artist Aki Onda who records and repurposes real life sounds. We want to make a film with him on set the whole time recording the sound of us making the film which we would use as the film’s score. The Dalek, right, I know that term. They seem kind of steampunk but without all the ick that comes with steampunk. When do you think you’ll hear back about the submissions? I guess you probably don’t know. Luck galore, naturally. ** Dominik, Hi!!! Well, if you’re ambitious, ‘Life, A User’s Manual’ is kind of his masterpiece, but it’s a biggie. If you want a short, fun one, ‘An Attempt at Exhausting a Place in Paris’ is great, for instance. I had to look love’s last karaoke up, but, of course, Placebo! Yeah deep in the night, I’m lost in love, Yeah deep in the night, I’m lost in love, A thousand lights, Look at you, I’m lost, I’m lost, I’m lost, yeah, I’m lost, Lost, lost, lost, Ooh, Ooh, low, low, low, low, low, low, low, low, G. ** _Black_Acrylic, Oh, no, the day has come! PT enters its eternity as a legacy act! You did great, maestro! I’ll go listen and sniffle. Everyone, Ben Robinson’s gift from god in the form of a musical podcast Play Therapy v2.0 has just launched its final ever episode. A sad day, but your ears and probably booty will celebrate if you’re wise enough to hear it out here. Take my word for it. Hugs and hurrah, B! ** Lucas, I’m okay, I think, and you foraged through the crappiness perfectly well, so we’re kind of twinsies, I guess. Well, posts can be pretty long. I mean today’s post is pretty long. Don’t worry about it, iow. I’m thrilled that you’re enjoying making it. Are you/did you read in the group reading? This week is visa material gathering and making the teaser trailer for our film and no doubt a bunch of other as yet undetermined things. Thanks, buddy. ** Steve, Hey. No, I wouldn’t write for Spin. I swore off writing non-fiction/ journalism/ reviews quite a while ago. An exception would be being able to interview someone that seemed exciting to talk with. I hope they bite on your proposal. I’ll try to find ‘GTH’ for sure. Interesting: the Wiseman retro is just wrapping up here, so on to the next. I assume he’ll go over for that? It’s pretty impressive how energised and completely mentally with it he is at his age. He lives here in the same artists residency complex I lived in for seven years. ** Diesel Clementine, Hospital porter, that’s interesting. And intense. Mm, I’d have to guess, but, if I guess, I would guess the Gamecube game I was probably raving about is ‘Eternal Darkness’, although I’m not 100% sure it’s a Gamecube game. Probably. Oh, wow, how was FKA Twigs? She’s playing here soon, and I was wondering if I should go, or I was until I saw it’s sold out, of course. We didn’t have any storming here. Just the usual Paris moist dreariness. Glad you’re on the other side of all of that. ** HaRpEr, And the poem revision is truly more exciting. How interesting. I mean, the original wasn’t shabby either. Everybody is talking about the new FKA Twigs, but I haven’t checked in on it yet, though almost certainly today. I like her work, yeah, of course. ‘Celine and Julie …’, yeah, so wonderful. My weekend: I saw my visiting UK friend Adem. He and his ex-bf are starting a literary press, so we talked a lot about that. I worked fitfully on things. I had my bi-weekly Zoom film/book club and we watched/ talked about Errol Morris’s great documentary about pet cemeteries, ‘Gates of Heaven’, and that was excellent. I’m okay, in other words, thanks! I’m going to read ‘A Burning Stint’ once I publish this and when I’m not in p.s. mindset. Thank you! Exciting! ** Darbz, Apologies about my blog’s or your server’s stinginess. Oh, you talked that comment. That’s interesting. I wonder if other people do that. I never talk/type. I think it would be really a mess if I did. I don’t talk that good. ‘Black Sunlight’ is great, highly recommended again. Nice: snow. We’re still utterly bereft here on that front. You live where ‘Blue Velvet’ was filmed? Wow. I’ll watch it again and imagine you scurrying around in the frames. No, the novel I lost I just totally wiped out of my mind and started over. Hopefully it was shitty. Good to find out if drag is your thing or not, although if it’s just blah, usual drag, don’t dismiss the genre. For instance, there are a few great drag artists in the post today. I don’t know ‘Labyrinth Ear’, so thank you. I’ll hear it out once I’m out of the p.s. because my brain won’t be so concentrated on paying close attention to verbiage and then outputting verbiage. Thank you! May your week begin like amazing opening credits. ** Right. Today the blog presents the opportunity for you to go back in time and and experience a really exciting period when downtown NYC was bursting with wildly amazing performance artists of all different kinds. There’s some really great stuff up there. Have a look and listen. And see you tomorrow.

Georges Perec Day *

* (restored/expanded)

‘Georges Perec was born, the only son of Icek Judko and Cyrla (Schulewicz) Peretz – Polish Jews who had emigrated to France in the 1920s – in a working-class district of Paris. Perec’s father, who enlisted in the French Army during World War II, died in 1940 from unattended gunfire or shrapnel wounds, and Perec’s mother perished in the Nazi Holocaust, probably in Auschwitz. Perec was taken into the care of his paternal aunt and uncle in 1942, and in 1945 he was formally adopted by them.

‘He started writing reviews and essays for La Nouvelle Revue Française and Les Lettres Nouvelles, prominent literary publications, while studying history and sociology at the Sorbonne. In 1961, Perec began working at the Neurophysiological Research Laboratory attached to the Hôpital Saint-Antoine as an archivist, a low-paid position which he retained until 1978. A few reviewers have noted that the daily handling of records and variegated data may have had an influence on his literary style. Perec’s other major influence was the Oulipo, which he joined in 1967, meeting Raymond Queneau, among others. Perec dedicated his masterpiece, La Vie mode d’emploi (Life: A User’s Manual) to Queneau, who died before it was published.

La Vie mode d’emploi (1978) brought Perec some financial and critical success – it won the Prix Médicis – and allowed him to turn to writing full-time. He was a writer in residence at the University of Queensland, Australia in 1981, during which time he worked on the unfinished 53 Jours (53 Days). Shortly after his return from Australia, his health deteriorated. A heavy smoker, he was diagnosed with lung cancer. He died the following year, only forty-five years old.

‘The Association Georges Perec was founded in 1982 in order to promote the work of Georges Perec internationally and to establish public archives. The Perec archives in Paris have almost all editions of Perec’s work published both in France and abroad, as well as a weath of secondary literature on the author. The association is open to visits once a week in the Arsenal library. It organises a monthly seminar at Paris VII Jussieu university where researchers present papers on Perec. It also publishes its own biannual Bulletin Georges Perec with details of the latest editions and secondary literature published worldwide, and the Cahiers Georges Perec with articles on Perec’s work.’ — collaged

 

____________

Georges Perec, Oulibiographer
by Bernard Magne

‘There are facts: Georges Perec has been a member of the Oulipo since March 1967.

‘There are photographs: in the group’s “official” photo, taken in 1975, Georges Perec occupies the eleventh position from the right (counting the head of André Blavier on the table).

‘There are rules: despite his death on March 3, 1982, Georges Perec is still a member of the Oulipo—which, as we know, makes no distinction between living members and deceased ones.

‘There are statistics: “I consider myself a genuine product of the Oulipo. My existence as a writer is 90% dependent on my knowing the Oulipo at a pivotal point in my formation, in my literary work,” Perec has declared.

‘There are tributes: pen in hand, Oulipians remember Georges Perec each week.

‘There are pilgrimages: pen still in hand, Oulipians make their own attempts to exhaust Parisian locations.

‘There is, above all, the complexity of a body of work so rich and so diverse that it seems impossible to reduce to a label—whether grandiose or grassroots is anyone’s guess.’

(Read the rest)

 

____________

The Infra-Ordinary

In an essay written in 1973 (“Approches de quoi?” “Approaches to What?”), Georges Perec coined the term “l’infra-ordinaire” (the infra-ordinary) for those minimal aspects of reality which he hoped to zero in on. Perec asks himself: “What is the real in people’s life, what is the real in people’s consciousness? What real still belongs to them?” For him, the real is not what merits inclusion in History, but instead what is likely to be forgotten, what is fleeting, inconsequential. The anthropologist’s task is to rescue things from their opacity: “what we call quotidian is not evidence, but opacity” – writes Perec – “a kind of blindness, a sort of anesthesia.” In order to free oneself from such blindness, phenomenologists prescribe the bracketing of the world as a necessary precondition to understanding. Similarly, Perec’s first step is to detach himself from contingency, yet for him the process of bracketing focuses on what is the narrative material for other writers or journalists, evidence itself. He will scrupulously avoid any “interesting” detail; instead he will launch himself into a diligent analysis of the most trivial aspects of the here and now:

‘What happens everyday, the banal, the quotidian, the evident, the common, the ordinary, the infra-ordinary, the background noise, the habitual; how can one account for it, how can one question it, how can one describe it?’

‘Trains begin to exist only when they are derailed, the more passengers are dead, the more trains exist; planes have access to existence only when they are hijacked; the only meaningful destiny for cars is crashing into a sycamore: fifty-two weekends per year, fifty-two totals; so many dead and all the better for the news if the figures keep increasing! […] In our haste to measure the historic, the meaningful, the revealing, we leave aside the essential.’

‘What really happens, what we live, all the rest, where is it?’

‘It is of no importance to me that these questions here are fragmentary and simply hint at a method, or, at the most, a project. It is of great importance to me, on the contrary, that these questions appear to be futile and trivial: it is precisely that which makes them as essential as, if not more essential than, so many other questions through which we have vainly tried to capture our truth.’

— taken from The Ali Baba Project

— Read Perec’s full essay ‘The Infra-Ordinary’ here.

 

____________

Georges Perec Thoughts on the Art and Technique of Crossing Words

‘The construction of a crossword consists of two operations that are quite different and in the end perfectly independent of each other: the first is the filling of the diagram; the second is the search for definitions.

‘The filling of the diagram is a tedious, meticulous, maniacal task, a sort of letter-based arithmetic where all that matters is that words have this or that length, and that their juxtapositions reveal groupings that are compatible with the perpendicular construction of other words; it is a system of primary constraints where the letter is omnipresent but language is absent. Contrariwise, the search for definitions is fluid, intangible work, a stroll in the land of words, intended to uncover, in the imprecise neighborhood that constitutes the definition of a word, the fragile and unique lo­cation where it will be simultaneously revealed and hidden. The two operations imply mental faculties that could almost seem contradictory: in the first, one proceeds by trial and error, starting over twenty or thirty times a grid that one always deems less than perfect; in the second, one favors intuition, fortuitous finds, sudden illumination; the first is done at one’s table, with obstinacy and tenacity, groping, counting, erasing; the other is rather done at any hour of day or night, without thinking about it, strolling, letting one’s attention float freely in the wake of the thousand and one associations evoked by this or that word. One can very well imagine—and one sees this sometimes—a crossword composed by two cruciverbalists, one of whom would supply the diagram, and the other the definitions. In any case, the two operations are almost always separate: one starts by constructing the diagram (gene­rally starting from the first word across or down—which constitute what is called the gallows—chosen in advance because of a definition deemed felicitous), and it is once the diagram is completed that one starts to seek definitions of the other words it contains. Not only words, alas, but also groups of two, three, four letters, or even sometimes more, which, in spite of the author’s efforts, persist in not spontaneously offering any known meaning.’

(Read the entirety @ The Believer)

 

____________

Georges Perec’s 10×10 Knight’s Tour

‘The following 10×10 Knight’s Tour was used by Georges Perec to descibe the rooms of a Paris apartment building in his masterpiece: Life: A User’s Manual.

Perec: “it would have been tedious to describe the building floor by floor and apartment by apartment; but that was no reason to leave the chapter sequence to chance. So I decided to use a principle derived from an old problem well known to chess enthusiasts as the Knight’s tour; it requires moving a knight around the 64 squares of a chess-board without its ever landing more than once on the same square… For the special case of Life A User’s Manual, a solution for a 10 x 10 chess-board had to be found… The division of the book into six parts was derived from the same principle: each time the knight has finished touching all four sides of the square, a new section begins”

‘Perec’s 10×10 Knight’s tour is reproduced below. Notice that the tour is not accurate, because of the incorrect knight move between squares 65 and 66. A more accurate knight’s tour can be seen further below.’

— taken from The Borders Chess Club Website

 

____________

Georges Perec A Void

A Void (La Disparition) is a novel in the form of a lipogram in which the letter e does not appear. In English this deprives one of an essential article (“the”) and about two thirds of the words in the language; in French it is even worse, leaving one with about an eighth of the lexicon. My initial feeling was that this was a gimmick which might be amusing in a poem or a short story but which must surely be ridiculous in a novel, but I soon realised I was wrong.’

Excerpt: ‘Noon rings out. A wasp, making an ominous sound, a sound akin to a klaxon or a tocsin, flits about. Augustus, who has had a bad night, sits up blinking and purblind. Oh what was that word (is his thought) that ran through my brain all night, that idiotic word that, hard as I’d try to pun it down, was always just an inch or two out of my grasp – fowl or foul or Vow or Voyal? – a word which, by association, brought into play an incongruous mass and magma of nouns, idioms, slogans and sayings, a confusing, amorphous outpouring which I sought in vain to control or turn off but which wound around my mind a whirlwind of a cord, a whiplash of a cord, a cord that would split again and again, would knit again and again, of words without communication or any possibility of combination, words without pronunciation, signification or transcription but out of which, notwithstanding, was brought forth a flux, a continuous, compact and lucid flow: an intuition, a vacillating frisson of illumination as if caught in a flash of lightning or in a mist abruptly rising to unshroud an obvious sign – but a sign, alas, that would last an instant only to vanish for good.’

— Read ‘Anton Vowl,’ the first chapter of Perec’s A Void, here.

 

____________

Georges Perec and classification
Oct 23rd, 2006 by maxine
from LibraryThing’s ideas blog

‘The brilliant, eclectic French writer Georges Perec is best known for his unconventional novel Life: A User’s Manual. Others may know him as the guy who wrote a novel, La disparition, without using a single e–which is at least as hard to pull off in French as it is in English—and followed it up with the shorter Les Revenentes, which used e as its only vowel! (La disparition was translated into English by Gilbert Adair as A Void; Les revenentes hasn’t been translated.) He wrote a 5,000 word palindrome—much harder to do before computers—and a fake paper on the “yelling effect” produced when a soprano is pelted with tomatoes.

‘What does any of this have to do with classification? Well, for much of his life Perec worked as a archivist and classifier for a scientific laboratory. He thought deeply about classification and its consequences, a topic which appears often in his essays and other (unclassifiable) short pieces, published in English as Species of Spaces. “Think/Classify” is (intentionally) an unordered grab bag of thoughts on the topic—Sei Shonagon’s lists, French place-names, the organization of the 1900 World’s Fair, his personal filing system, etc. “On the art…” aligns nicely with what Thingamabrarians say about what really happens when you try to put your books in order. Some choice bits:

“Disorder in a [personal] library is not serious in itself; it ranks with ‘Which drawer did I put my socks in?’ … Opposed to this apologia for the sympathetic disorder is the small-minded temptation toward an individual bureaucracy: one thing for each place and each place for its one thing, and vice versa. Between these two tensions, one which sets a premium on letting things be, on a good-natured anarchy, the other that exalts the virtues of the tabula rasa, the cold efficiency of the great arranging, one always ends by trying to set one’s book in order. This is a trying, depressing operation, but one liable to produce pleasant surprises, such as coming upon a book you had forgotten because you no longer see it and which, putting off until tomorrow what you won’t do today, you finally re-devour lying face down on your bed.”

“So very tempting to want to distribute the entire world in terms of a single code. A universal law would then regulate phenomena as a whole: two hemispheres, five continents, masculine and feminine, animal and vegetable, singular plural, right left, four seasons, five senses, six vowels, seven days, twelve months, twenty six letters. … Unfortunately, this doesn’t work, has never even begun to work, will never work. Which won’t stop us continuing for a long time to come to categorize this animal or that according to whether it has an odd number of toes or hollow horns.”

“Taxonomy can make your head spin. It does mine whenever my eyes light on an index of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC). By what succession of miracles has agreement been reached, practically throughout the world, that 668.184.2.099 shall denote the finishing of toilet soap, and 629.1.018–465 horns on refuse vehicles; whereas 621.3.027.23, 621.436:382, 616.24—002.5—084, 796.54, and 913.15 denote respectively: tensions not exceeding 50 volts, the export trade in Diesel motors, the prophylaxy of tuberculosis, camping, and the ancient geography of Japan!’”

— taken from OWL’s (omnipresent Wisconsin librarian) Librarian’s Place Blog

 

____________

Georges Perec Métaux
R.L.D. [Robert et Lydie Dutrou], 1985; edition of 135

‘Robert Dutrou, one of the most important French printers, founded the RLD studio in 1973. In 1985 they published seven poems by Georges Perec: Métaux. The book contained seven engravings by Italian artist Paolo Boni. In addition to his well known novels, Perec wrote so-called ‘heterogrammatical’ poems, written with a limited number of letters: a, e, i, l, n, o, r, s, t, u, adding one other letter of the alphabet for each poem (the so-called ‘joker’). The author therefore uses a special alphabet of only 11 letters for these poems. The poem is presented in a square of 11 x 11 letters, in which the letters he uses may only appear once in each line and each column. For clarity’s sake, the poem is also presented in more traditional form, with the addition of punctuation marks, accents, spaces and blank lines. In 1976 Perec published 176 such poems under the title Alphabets. He changed his spelling rules for Métaux: these are seven poems for which he used a 14-letter alphabet: 12 regular letters (a, d, e, i, l, m, n, o, r, s, t, u) with one additional letter for each poem, and another ‘joker’ letter.’

— See sample pages from Métaux and read more about the book here.

 

____________

Three authors’ anagrammed versions of ‘Vocalisations’ by Georges Perec

‘These are all simultaneous anagrams and approximate English translations of Vocalisations by George Perec, a lipogrammatic rendering of Rimbaud’s poem Voyelles omitting the letter E. Note that this constraint is present at two levels: the poem elides the parts of Rimbaud’s original that talk about E, as well as avoiding the letter itself.’

Vocalisations

A noir, (Un blanc), I roux, U safran, O azur:
Nous saurons au jour dit ta vocalisation:
A, noir carcan poilu d’un scintillant morpion
Qui bombinait autour d’un nidoral impur,

Caps obscurs; qui, cristal du brouillard ou du Khan,
Harpons du fjord hautain, Rois Blancs, frissons d’anis?
I, carmins, sang vomi, riant ainsi qu’un lis
Dans un courroux ou dans un alcahool mortifiant;

U, scintillations, rond divins du flot marin,
Paix du pâtis tissu d’animaux, paix du fin
Sillon qu’un fol savoir aux grands fronts imprima;

O, finitif clairon aux accords d’aiguisoir,
Soupirs ahurissant Nadir ou Nirvâna:
O l’omicron, rayon violin dans son Voir!

Read the authors’ anagrammations here.

— taken from The Anagrammy Awards Home Page

 

________________

from Georges Perec’s History of the Lipogram

‘Littré defines the lipogram as “a work in which one affects to exclude a particular letter of the alphabet”; Larousse says, more precisely: “literary work in which one compels oneself strictly to exclude one or several letters of the alphabet”. An appreciation of the nuance between “one affects” and “one compels oneself” might have constituted one of the purposes of this article….

‘Exclusively preoccupied with its great capitals (Work, Style, Inspiration, World-Vision, Fundamental Options, Genius, Creation, etc.), literary history seems deliberately to ignore writing as practice, as work, as play. Systematic artifices, formal mannerisms (that which, in the final analysis, constitutes Rabelais, Sterne, Roussel…) are relegated to the registers of asylums for literary madmen, the “Curiosities”: “Amusing Library,” “Treasury of Singularities,” “Philological Entertainments,” “Literary Frivolities,” compilations of a maniacal erudition where rhetorical “exploits” are described with suspect complaisance, useless exaggeration, and cretinous ignorance. Constraints are treated therein as aberrations, as pathological monstrosities of language and of writing; the works resulting from them are not even worthy to be called “works”: locked away, once and for all and without appeal, and often by their authors themselves, these works, in their prowess and their skillfulness, remain paraliterary monsters justiciable only to a symptomology whose enumeration and classification order a dictionary of literary madness.

‘Without wishing to distinguish between that which, in writing, is madness, and that which is not (is platitude a form of wisdom?), one might at least recall that formal mannerisms have existed since time immemorial and not only, as some feign to believe, during so-called “decadent periods”: they have traversed all of Western literature (we shall not speak of the others here) and have left their trace on every genre….

‘We do not pretend that systematic artifices are identical to writing, but only that they constitute a dimension of writing which must not be ignored. Rather than harrying the ineffable to who knows where, shouldn’t we first examine the reasons for the persistence of the sonnet? And why should we forget that the most beautiful line of poetry in the French language is composed of monosyllables?…

‘…the suppression of the letter, of the typographical sign, of the basic prop, is a purer, more objective, more decisive operation [than suppressing a given word], something like constraint degree zero, after which everything becomes possible.’

— taken from Attempts: A reality-based blog by Stephen Frug

 

____________

The system inside Georges Perec’s Life: A User’s Manual

‘In keeping with Oulipo objectives, Perec created a complex system to construct the novel Life: A User’s Manual which would generate for each chapter a list of items, references or objects which that chapter should then contain or allude to. He described this system as a “machine for inspiring stories”. There are 42 lists of 10 objects each, gathered into 10 groups of 4 with the last two lists a special “Coupl
es” list. The way in which these apply to each chapter is governed by an array called a Graeco-Latin square. The lists are considered in pairs, and each pair is governed by one cell of the array, which guarantees that every combination of elements is encountered. For instance, the items in the couples list are seen once with their natural partner (in which case Perec gives an explicit reference), and once with every other element (where he is free to be cryptic). In the 1780s, the great mathematician Leonhard Euler had conjectured that a 10×10 Graeco-Latin square could not exist and it was not until 1959 that one was actually constructed, refuting Euler. To further complicate matters, the 38th and 39th list are named “Missing” and “False” and each list comprises the numbers 1 to 10. The number these lists give for each chapter indicates one of the 10 groups of 4 lists, and folds the system back on itself: one of the elements must be omitted, and one must be false in some way (an opposite, for example). Things become tricky when the Missing and False numbers refer to group 10, which includes the Missing and False lists.’


One constraint was Perec constructed the novel based on the Knight’s Tour within a chessboard: “The knight is placed on the empty board and, moving according to the rules of chess, must visit each square exactly once”. He divided the apartment block into a 10 X 10 grid and followed the Knights Tours from character to character, room to room, chapter to chapter.

‘Life: A User’s Manual (Ch. 51)’ by Georges Perec
from Intermittencies of the Mind

‘I have been reading Georges Perec’s Life: A User’s Manual for the last week. I have been taking it slowly and still have a little way to go but hope to finish in a day or so. It’s a fun book that can be maddening at times, and even dull every now and then (I find lists dull, there’s no way round it. Beckett also enjoyed lists and listing permutations of things, and it can be amusing in a way, but, at the same time…dull). But one list that is ‘not-dull’ comes about halfway through the book in chapter fifty-one.

‘Before I go any further I should point out to anyone who is unfamiliar with the book that it takes place at a specific point in time in a Parisian apartment block at 11 Rue Simon-Crubellier. We get to nose around in each apartment, see who is there and find out about their lives as well as the lives of the previous inhabitants; but the narrative is frozen in time—according to Wikipedia it is June 23, 1975, just before 8 pm; I haven’t seen this stated explicitly in the text yet but it can probably be inferred from the chronology at the back of the book. It is also worth noting that Perec was a member of the Oulipo group of writers who wrote inventive works using ‘constraints’ as a way to inspire their writing. As an example Perec wrote a novel without using the letter ‘e’ ( A Void in English).

‘So, back to Chapter fifty-one, and one of the characters, an artist called Valène, considers painting a picture of the apartment block, with the front removed and he will paint all the inhabitants of the building in situ, including himself. Perec then proceeds to create a list which we soon realise is a list of short descriptions of characters in the book so far and, as we don’t recognise all of them, characters who will appear in the rest of the book. Because the text used for the list is a monospaced typeface, possibly Courier, it is obvious that each list entry is the same length, which turns out to be sixty characters. We then notice that every ten entries are blocked together and there is a separator after 60 entries. There is another separator at 120 and another at 180….well, not quite, it ends at 179.

‘At this point it may be best to look at some images to see what I mean.

‘If you look on the second image you may be able to see that a diagonal line appears from top-right to bottom-left. This is formed because of a further pattern that Perec has used. Line 61 ends with the letter ‘g’, the second to last letter in line 62 is also ‘g’, the third from last letter in line 63 is also ‘g’ and so on until we get to line 120 which starts with ‘G’ thus forming a diagonal of ‘g’s. Now that we know that the second block has this pattern we can see if the first and third blocks also have this pattern. Although it’s not so obvious we can see that there is a similar diagonal of ‘e’s in lines 1-60 and a diagonal of ‘o’s in lines 121-179, which together spells ‘EGO’. Why? I’m not sure there is one other than playfulness.’

Wikipedia has a decent thumbnail explanation of the novel’s systems, and you can read it here.

 

____________

George Perec’s Last Healthy Days in Australia
by Joseph K.

In 1981 Jean-Michel Raynaud, then lecturer in French at the University of Queensland, invited Perec to Australia for two months, and later documented the writer’s stay in Pour un Perec, lettré, chiffré (Presses universitaires de Lille, 1987).

Throughout that September, Georges Perec was resident writer at the University of Queensland in Brisbane, where his duties consisted mainly in running a weekly Oulipian poetry workshop for students and staff. Perec had hoped that, while in Australia, he would be able to concentrate on Fifty-three Days, the novel that was still unfinished when he died; but progress was slow, as he found himself busier than expected.

October was spent giving lectures and interviews in Adelaide, Melbourne, Canberra and Sydney, some of which were duly recorded. Things, his first novel and the only one then available in English, was already on the syllabus of many universities and, as a result, Perec gave several lectures on this book. He also talked at length about poetic writing and the work of Oulipo. Unfortunately there is no trace of the lecture in English entitled “Fiction and Autobiography” that Perec was scheduled to give at Flinders University, Adelaide, on 2 October 1981.

A few days before Perec’s departure for Australia, Kaye Mortley recorded a long conversation with him in English in Paris for The Listening Room, an Australian literary radio programme. This proved to be the last formal interview of his life, as he died of cancer not long after his return to France. Here are three of Perec’s answers:

– ‘At the end of my life, I would like to have used all the words of the dictionary. That’s impossible. And not only to … use all of them but to create some. That’s my ambition. That’s why I write and how I write, at the same time.’

How do you situate yourself in relationship to your readers…?

– ‘I represent myself as something like a chess player playing [a game of chess] with the reader. I must convince him, or her, to read what I wrote, and he must begin the book and go until the end. If he doesn’t, I miss my aim.’

So you regard him as a sort of alter ego who reads, who is reading?

– ‘Not exactly… yes, at the end. But I mean during the process of reading, I consider him like a chess mate – somebody who is playing a part with me. The model for that kind of thing is the detective novel, all detective novels. When you read a detective novel, you don’t care really about who kills the victim and who is the murderer and… you care only about… you wonder why you don’t find. And it’s very interesting because in a novel you try to play with what is true, what is false, what to think, what to… – just to keep an aura of suspense, in a sense like Roland Barthes uses it. Something is suspendu – hanging – and it’s a way of dreaming, of going elsewhere through the process of fiction. What is most important in a novel, it’s… I could say it’s not written. It’s something which is… behind the words and which is never said.’

 

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** Dominik, Hi!!! Curious invention, yes? Natalie Cole? I haven’t thought about her in a million years. My mom loved her dad. Love me hate me help me, Save me from me, Hold me hurt me stop me, Take this love out me!, G. ** jay, Hey. ‘Audition’, nice pick. I don’t want to say ‘Salo’ because it’s so obvious and I don’t even like ‘Salo’, but it would be awfully smelly, so … ‘Resident Evil 7’ candle, wow, news to me. I’m going to poke around on eBay in a minute, and I’m not kidding. As I wish for only experiences of pleasure for you, I hereby thank Von Trier for assisting in the granting of that wish. Weekend of … ? ** Misanthrope, We always do, get through things. One of the assists of getting older is that you can remember things like the nuclear bomb scare and Vietnam and AIDS and whatever awful else and also remember that the world around you continued, battered but still in place. How much does a pack of ciggies cost in VA these days? My weekend looks to be both chill and chilly. Yours too to some degree, I assume. ** HaRpEr, It’s good to get hung up on that stuff temporarily. It’s good to have a clear idea of what you and your work have to deal with. The trick is just to not overrate and empower that stuff, basically. You know. ** _Black_Acrylic, I heard about that storm, jeez, don’t forget to buckle up. It doesn’t seem to be barreling our way, but the French weather predictors are legendarily 75% always wrong. Are the skies quelled now? ** Steeqhen, I wish someone would invent … what would it be called … Hear-o-hearing? Where you could hear the actual sounds of the filming of the movie you’re watching, the stuff that gets erased in post-production — the footsteps and mumbling of the crew, the clanking of the equipment, the sound of the fans blowing the ‘wind’, etc. I think the only ‘disasters’ I’ve ever had to deal with were earthquakes. They’re scary, but they usually only last for thirty or forty seconds, which is nice because you get the scare and then the relief in one batch. You can’t sleep through those, although I guess people do. When I see the words ‘Doctor Who’ I only picture that kind of ornate robot or whatever it is and a phone booth that I think is like an elevator or something? Did you get your writings finished and submitted? Hope so. ** PL, Thank you. There’s a 4D movie theater here. I only went there to see that last ‘Godzilla’ movie. It was weak sauce but kind of funnish, I guess. On a first, quick scroll-through, those new artworks by you are really great! I’ll need to pore over them, but, yeah, I can see the growth from the earlier work of yours I saw. And I’ll see if I can find the ‘Sluts’ thingeroony. Congrats! Awesome work! Everyone, Highly recommended that you poke this link and go look at some new drawings by the wonderfully exploding artist PL. Thanks so much for sharing that. I’m already jonesing to delve. ** Steve, Hey. Weekend: The plan had been to make the teaser trailer for ‘Room Temperature’, but it looks like that’s not going to happen so quickly. The Pompidou is hosting a Frederick Wiseman retrospective, and they’re showing a film of his that I’ve never seen, ‘Public Housing’ with him in attendance, so I might see that. Tomorrow is my biweekly Zoom book/film club, this time discussing Errol Morris’s ‘Gates of Heaven’ and Madison Murray’s book ‘My Gaping Masshole’. Stuff like that. I’ve heard about ‘Grand Theft Hamlet’, and what a swell idea. How was it? I guess my question would be has Spin returned to being a magazine that there is any good reason to read? I hope your parents’ phone is back on the hook. Everyone, Steve has a triple-header of reviews he wrote that you can read and inform yourself via. He reviews Michael Roemer’s 1982 PILGRIM’S FAREWELL here. He reviews Steven Soderbergh’s PRESENCE here. And he reviews a Liza Minnelli documentary here. ** Lucas, I fully agree that 2025 will be your starring vehicle. Well, you see what variety there can be with posts here, structure-wise and build-wise, so anything that works for you will be just fine. You sound better, excellent. My Friday was pretty nothing-ish, I think, because I can’t really remember it distinctly. Have the finest weekend! ** James, Physics, yeah, I think I got a D in Physics back in school. Sometimes the steady, predetermined path is the best one. Apparently IKEA’s food court serves very good Swedish meatballs. Apparently even Swedish people rave about them. I wouldn’t know. They smell yuck. Breakfast in America is fun, at least if you’re an actual American. Iced tea! Chocolate milkshakes! Mozzarella sticks! The decor is a little too ‘Happy Days’ but you can’t have everything. Oh, I love Antiques Roadshow. I don’t know what that reveals about me. Oops, but anyone who calls you a dumbass is obviously unqualified to make that assessment. May you return with plenty of cut slack to bolster you. ** Diesel Clementine, Oh, okay, sorry for the preemptive congrats, but congrats on submitting it, and hopefully whoever decides will be sufficiently smart and have sufficiently excellent taste that I will be able to congratulate you without qualifications the next time the subject arises. You’re in the storm too, or were. We’re all dead still and merely moist here. Knock on wood, I guess? So keep your psychic projection handy and watch the news for a possible Paris assault. What is your husband’s job? Sorry if you or he already said and my brain is malfunctioning. ** Larst, I’m gonna hit the live show up this weekend. I don’t think they’re streaming ‘Eno’ over here, which sucks. You sound like you’re maxing out what the world has to offer you indeed! Well, and what you have to offer yourself, more importantly. ** Justin D, Hey, hey. You just made me imagine an advanced version of Scratch-n-Sniff where you could scratch the actual words in the text and something would waft up. Like even ‘the’ would exude something, fuck knows what. Anyway, thank you for the reverie, and I agree. I laid my potential weekend out somewhere above. Pretty tentative. You, yours? Thank you for the song. I’ll investigate it imminently. You keep finding new artists for me, and you know how hungry I am. xoxo. ** Okay. This weekend I give you a kind of hodge-podgy but well intentioned post about the great, great Georges Perec. See you on Monday.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 DC's

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑