The blog of author Dennis Cooper

Author: DC (Page 117 of 1086)

Pervs

____________
Paul Chan Sade for Sade’s sake, 2009
‘A 5 hour and 45 minute-long projection. Structured in the form of a ballad, Sade for Sade’s sake is comprised of forty-five second scenes that relate to one another like lines in a poem. The quivering, shadow-like imagery depicts naked human bodies in discursive, rhythmic, and orgiastic movements, with abstract shadows of geometric shapes floating among the bodies like artwork hung on walls, windows in a room, or even devotional objects. As the piece progresses, the bodies interact with growing intensity, until the entire projection erupts in trembling forms and part-objects, abstractly manifesting images of sex enmeshed with freedom, violence wrapped up with reason, art entangled in it all.’

 

____________
David Kennedy Cutler Second Skins, 2017-2020
inkjet on cotton and PETG, zipper, Velcro, deconstructed sneakers, wood, aluminium, hardware, casters

 

____________
Martin Gerber Various, 2010-2017


Blood of Eden, 2017


Das Mutterland (Et in Arcadia Ego), 2010


Attack of Plurals, 2017


Who Cares What the Future Brings, 2013

 

____________
Yu-Tzu Huang Perverted Norm, Normal Pervert, 2022
Perverted Norm, Normal Pervert is a project inspired by scientific research and explores the normality and abnormality of sexual activities among humans and snails.’

 

____________
Parviz Tanavoli Farhad and the Deer, 1960
‘Constructed from scrap metal, this assemblage depicted a man having sexual relations with a deer. The deer’s antlers were made of a bicycle’s form, the man and animal bodies of fenders and other parts of junkyard vehicles.’

 

____________
Nina Beier Manual Therapy, 2016
Robotic massage chair, precious and noble metals from electronic waste, dental industry and various currencies

 

____________
Marybeth Chew Black Narcissus, 2020
oil on canvas

 

____________
Richard Štipl Untitled, 2019
‘Stipl’s work is developed in traditional materials (wood, metal) and in the disciplines of figure and relief. The way they are handled, however, is not so traditional. Rather, it is inverted. Powerful sources of inspiration are evident in late Gothic wood-carving (especially in relief formats) and in the expressively tuned registers of baroque naturalism (e.g. Franz Xaver Messerschmidt).’

 

___________
Nicole Eisenman Various, 1998 -2016


It Is So, 2014


Long Distance, 2015


Dysfunctional Family, 2000


Morning Studio, 2016


Tunnel of Love, 1998

 

_____________
Eva Isleifs and Rakel McMahon Pervert Hunt, 2021
‘In the rise of the greek #metoo movement and the first juridical condemns of performers of sexual harassment in public space, the artists engage with the issue collecting stories from international contribution, spotting repeatedly mentioned urban areas and re-envisioning the map of Athens. Having experienced several incidents themselves and processing the confessions of others, Eva Isleifs and Rakel McMahon chose to respond to the undetectable threat seeking for the “dangerous” areas, wandering across them, resting to draw and sketch the environment and fortunate or less fortunate encounters. The material, collected throughout their research, is still developing as their observation continues and as participants contribute to the archive with their personal stories.’

 

_____________
Toshio Saeki Various, 2009-2015

 

_____________
Kaari Upson Janice, Tracy, Sarah, Kristin, Joan, … (2012)
‘In 2003 Kaari Upson entered a deserted house close to Los Angeles where she lives. Apparently a pervert has lived here who is now serving his time in prison. Upson took some of the found objects, named the mysterious figure ‘Larry’ and created several works within this new reality. All women that played a role in the narrative of the Larry project come together here and are named in the endlessly long title. the crutches are made from silicon and in their slackness have lost all functionality of support.’

 

_____________
Anna Uddenberg Sub-D (Inflation) x, 2022
polylactic acid, thermoset polymer resin, electropolished stainless steel, foam boat flooring, leather, chalk paint

 

_____________
Brian Sergio A day with milky, 2014
A series of 8 x 10in c-print photographs

 

_____________
Elaine Cameron-Weir hairshirt with lucky cilice SS 23 cartoon violence collection, 2023
mixed media

 

____________
KING COBRA White Bread, 2021
bamboo, resin clay, hair weave, acrylic, silicone, tattoo ink, mirror plinth

 

_____________
Darja Bajagic Ex Axes – Headless Body in Topless Bar, 2023
Direct-to-substrate print on steel axe

 

_____________
Cindy Sherman Untitled #257, 1992
cibachrome print

 

_____________
Galkin Daniil BDSM-2222, 2013
‘«BDSM» is divided into two parts, «Crop» and «Cuts» are located opposite to each other, and the combined «Wall of identification photography», against which there will be identification photography. In the authentication photographing every visitor can take the role of «suspect», which would be «a victim of child sexual manipulation» committed sexual acts against minors. The first part of the «Cuts», set up in a near-collage art, carved with images of children, against the walls for shooting identifications offering do for a sexual assault. The second part of the «Crop» demonstrates monochrome canvases with images of «empty» silhouettes of children, so-called «malyavy» Created from the remnants of childish and presented as a waste material. Thus, the project «BDSM» calls for the formation of healthy people, not sex offenders.’

 

_______________
Vesna Jovanovic Vanitas Still Life with Straitjacket, 2019
‘I spent the summer of 2017 working on this painting. The idea came to me that spring, after several months of private performances in which I restrained my erotic partner in order to draw him. I fastened all of the buckles and zippers and then started a timer, sketchbook in hand. I commanded him to sit still for an hour as he writhed helplessly.

‘Following each scene, I removed the sweaty restraints and set them aside, sometimes onto the nearby dining room table to protect them from dust. As they dried, the canvas straitjacket and matching leg restraint kept their human form, like a shell, a haunting reminder of the body that had struggled inside them. One day, after an exceptionally brutal scene, the lights were off and the evening sun entered the apartment at an angle just so. The rays illuminated the straitjacket like a 17th century still life.

‘After our next encounter, I arranged the gear and photographed it with the blinds open. The muzzle stood in for a human skull; the straps curled down like lemon peel cascading from the edge of the table… A month or two later he and I broke up, but I had the photographs to remind me of the scenes we did and how dangerous they were.’

 

_______________
Emma Sulkowicz The Ship Is Sinking, 2017
‘Sulkowicz’s new work almost seems to be crafted specifically to troll her critics. For the new piece, titled The Ship Is Sinking, she wore a white bikini adorned with the Whitney logo. An S&M professional who goes by “Master Avery,” playing a character called “Mr. Whitney,” bound Sulkowicz tightly and hung her from the ceiling on a wooden beam, periodically whipping and insulting her.’

 

_____________
Vincent Tiley Drummer, 2017
‘A high-shine silk organza work coated in semen-colored acrylic gel and bound in sleek lines of Shibari knotting, shares its name with the famed porn mag that explored gay leather subculture from the 1970s to the late nineties.’

 

_____________
Shawné Michaelain Holloway Sub Not Slave, 2017
‘There are two videos: one in a toilet, representing my likeness, and a multichannel video of me sitting and watching the space, positioned toward the toilet. To view the video in the toilet, one must place their feet inside guidelines on the floor to properly understand what I’ve created. It’s not enough to look, your body must be implicated. This way, viewers are flirting with a proposition, “Piss on me,” and are ultimately walking away having gone through a kind of negotiation. I suspect no one will accept the proposition but it is a proposition no less; each question on screen has a “yes or no answer” and everyone is encouraged to vocalize their responses while looking at the piece.’

 

______________
Nayland Blake Lap Dog, 1987
leather shoes, brass plates, chain

 

_____________
Xu Zhen Play 201301, 2013
‘It’s the attesting Gothic cathedral-inspired sculpture unlike any other art you might have seen. Its leather-bound spires are made of whips, chains, studs and spikes, sex toys and gags. Weighing close to a tonne, it hovers almost a metre above the floor, suspended by four ropes knotted according to the Japanese bondage technique Kinbaku, meaning the “beauty of tight binding”. The impressive sculpture, which is made entirely of bondage material, is the brainchild of provocative Chinese conceptual artist Xu Zhen​. Weighing a staggering 930 kilograms, and requiring a structural engineer and construction of a purpose-built frame to hang it from the gallery’s high ceiling, Zhen’s work Play 201301 took around 20 people almost three weeks to install.’

 

______________
Christopher Chiappa Lazy Boy Crucifix, 1999
fabric

 

_______________
Allen Jones Hatstand, Table and Chair, 1970
‘Debuted to protests in the 1970s, Allen Jones’ forniphilic “fetish” mannequins rocketed the artist to international fame while simultaneously making him enemy number one of the women’s liberation movement. Although Jones defended his work as a statement about the female form in response to the overwhelming decline of figural representation in modern art, his exhibitions continued to inspire outrage as protestors let off stink bombs and a demonstrator poured paint stripper over ‘Chair’ at the Tate Modern on International Women’s Day in 1986.’

 

_____________
Oscar Tuazon F.T.W., 2009
wood, metal, stain, lamps

 

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** Minks, Hi, Minks. Score on the Hebrew translation. All the best to you! ** jay, Hey. No summer plans yet here either other than trying to survive whatever Paris becomes once the Olympics invades us. I am a Dasai fan, yes. He’s great. Oh, that’s interesting, but no. I had a friend named Osamu, and I stole his name for the character. I wish it was more meta though. ** Lucas, Hi, L. Happy you liked the post. Um, the meeting was really annoying and stressful, but I’m over it now, at least until the next meeting. That’s interesting about the fewer dedicated spaces theory. Huh. That makes sense, doesn’t it? I’m super wary of landing myself in places like TikTok or Twitter or so on. I still only have Facebook, which is kind of homey, relatively speaking, or my feed is. I do have to join Instagram soon as I’ve been ordered to do that to promote our new film. A friend and I were just talking the other day about how strange and even improbable it is that this blog manages not to be invaded by aggressive opinion givers re: politics and social issues, etc. It’s remarkable, and I’m so happy about that. Luck galore with the math final today if you see this before then. I stopped understanding math when they got to Algebra. Maybe there’s some way in which brain fog and math can cohabit successfully? Anyway, luck, like I said. Filmmaking workshop? Like instruction re: how to make films? Obviously, that interests me. I hope there’s something of use for you there. ‘Our Lady of the Flowers’, yes, wonderful. My fave Genet is ‘Funeral Rites’, which is sort of like ‘OLofF’ but darker, I guess. ** Charalampos, Hi. Follow your inspiration wherever it takes you. I like the idea of a novel that’s only two paragraphs long. I think they mentioned what else Del Rey lost, but I was only looking for novels, so I didn’t pay attention. ** _Black_Acrylic, Kafka, king of the unfinished maybe. Great, great about the class’s long awaited return! ** Jack Skelley, Jack of jackalope zoo. Oh, wow. Assuming Hitchcock naturally did ‘Lucifer Sam’ then please tell he did ‘If It’s In You’? Nice. See you, like, wait, no ‘like’, tomorrow. ** Tosh Berman, There’s always another happy day, my friend. ** Cletus Crow, I think I read she wanted to rewrite/recreate that novel, but it’s been a while, and she hasn’t. ** Tomás, I’m glad I managed to make a kind of sense. Yeah, with films, sure, I agree, like ‘Marienbad’ for instance, and Haneke too. But films have the leg-up of actually presenting a determined physical space visually whereas with fiction it’s just about creating a formula that occasions readers’ imaginative leaps. It’s like architecting the perfect drug or something. I definitely look forward to our eventual coffee. Lebbeus Woods: I don’t know his work. I just did a quick search. Yes, his work looks fascinating. I’ll look further and do my best re: a post about him/his. Or if you want to do one, of course let me know. Thank you for that find! Swimmingly excellent Thursday to you. ** Sypha, Oh, right. I know zip about George R.R. Martin’s stuff other hearing lots about people’s frustration with his writing tempo. I figured you probably had a bunch of unfinished novels in your backlog. I do like the idea of a Christmas novel, if that’s a push of any help. ** Don Waters, Hi, Don! Great to see you, pal! I can’t even imagine how people with day jobs write novels, although I know some do. I have a friend who works as a guard at the Louvre, which he says involves just sitting in a chair all day and occasionally saying ‘step back’ when some get too close to a painting and makes the motion sensor beep, and he’s writing a novel. Largely in his head, admittedly. All my books? Jeez, you’re a trooper and a saint, buddy. Thank you. You’re writing a novel, and I’m guessing it’s going okay since you mentioned it? That’s really great news! Uh, I don’t know who you haven’t heard of … Have you read ‘Autoportrait’ by Edouard Leve? ‘Man in the Holocene’ by Max Frisch? I could go on and on. There are so many really good French novels. Short is standard fare over here. I’m good enough, thanks. And you too, seemingly. Yeah, lovely to get to talk with you, man. ** Harper, Hi. I love Welch too, a whole bunch. I did a post years ago about the doll houses he made that I really need to restore. Yeah, his poetry isn’t so great, it’s too bad, but nobody’s flawless. I love Jane Bowles too. Another high five. Big luck re: the job interview. Better to be offered and decline or accept and bail eventually than not, worst comes to worst. I didn’t know that about Stephen Tennant. Did any of his attempts survive? ** James Bennett, Hi. I think I mostly just like to get the lay of the land of the place I’m visiting unless there’s some pre-known highlight that I’m in search of. It just seems crazy and counterproductive not to visit Dublin for every reason, so I’ll probably hit that up and see what happens. I like the lush and green. I guess who doesn’t? I’ve read ‘The Third Policeman’ and ‘The Dalkey Archive’. Both great. What’s your O’Brien favorite or tip? Thanks! ** A, Hey. So sorry about the family mess. I’ll go find your Hobart piece. Sounds intense. I’m fine, just trying to finish the film and write the next one. I have a little book coming out, so I’ll see what that does if anything. I haven’t seen The Whitney Review thing. They didn’t send it to me. I guess it must be sold in Paris somewhere. I did read ‘Twelve’, but I can’t remember if I liked it or not. I’ve never heard of ‘Parasocialite’, but I’ll go see what it is. Not sure about LA. Our fucking film producers don’t want us to do a cast/crew screening for absurd reasons, so we’re fighting to do that then get over there. ** Steve, Mm, I’m not sure. ‘The Pale King’ obviously. ‘A Voice Through a Cloud’ And I think maybe a few others. Hope your friend pops up. No, I haven’t started ‘Fuccboi’. I’m way behind on so much. You’ve nudged me, so that’ll help. ** David Breithaupt, H, David! Thanks so much for entering. And for the news about that Jackson which I personally did not know about and will certainly read now that I do. Thank you! ** Dot Toevsky, Thanks, and nice name to you. Not a Dale Peck fan then, haha. What about Anne Sexton? You down with her? Cheers back to you, sire. ** Jeff J, Yeah, the melancholy is nice. The ‘planned and never happened’ reeks of charisma. Sometimes. Okay, I’ll angle for ‘Boys Alive’ then. Thanks. The producer meeting was rather awful, and no progress was made. Backsliding, if anything. Long, uninteresting story. I’ve had ‘ …TV Glow’ cued up to watch for a while, but I haven’t. The reports are warding me off a bit. But I will, Okay, cool, about the email. ** Jamie F, Thanks, Jamie. Me neither about the Lana Del Rey novel. I’m a big fan of David Foster Wallace. The recent turn against him just seems boring to me. Nobody writing in English writes better sentences than he did. If you’re a sentence fetishist like me, they’re like LSD. Plus, he was a great guy. I knew him. He was kind and a total pip. Me too: I can skill my way through the crowd set up with seeming aplomb while, inside, I’m rattling like a wild animal in a cage. It’s great you had the soulmate even if it didn’t last forever. Finding someone you’re just magically in tune with is really remarkable. And, in Zac’s case, someone you can collaborate with artistically with any compromising whatsoever. It’s crazy. Enjoy the bright sun. You guys are heading into winter, aren’t you? Here it’s springy for sure, and I’m going to walk within that, maybe without even wearing a coat! ** Justin D, Hi, J. Hm, I wonder if any Koi owners bond with them. They seem like their fate is to be decorative, the poor things, unless they like being objects in motion. Da Vinci makes sense right there, I think, yeah. No, I can’t take what I am told X/Twitter is. Even peaceful Facebook gets a little too testy at times. And, you know, there’s niche porn all over the place, or in accessible pockets all over the place, so … But it’s good that you can max it out. I’m sure Zac and I would be happy to be on Bret’s podcast. I did it not so long ago, and he’s fun. I like him. I think our film is probably a little non-commercial for him. He likes edgy indie, but I think ours might a little too leaning towards the experimental side for his tastes. But why not find out. Thank you for looking out for me. Same from me to you if you need it. ** PL, Hi. Well, I like them at a distance, of course. I don’t, like, hang out with guys like that. Or not these days. I did whence I was young, to say the least. It was good for my work, less so for me. I like and admire Jonas Mekas very much. Quite a bit of a hero, that guy, if you kneel before experimental film, which I have been known to do. ** Huckleberry Shelf, Hey there. I’m going to try Pasolini’s ‘Boys Alive’ first just ‘cos Jeff up above pushed me there. I’ll let you know, or you let me know. I haven’t actually seen ‘Crimes of the Future’, strangely. It slipped by, I don’t know why. But I’m definitely on it with your high recommendation. You sound like I remember feeling when I started moving more firmly into writing prose. Watch out, you might be a novelist any day now. It’s not so bad, it’s just a lot more time consuming. I’m excited to read/feel your excitement about that. David just moved back to LA, which is good because I might actually get to see him. I haven’t seen him in person in literally decades. We both had brown hair the last time. I like Michael Mann’s films. Especially his films up through ‘Collateral’. A little less so after that. I weirdly haven’t seen ‘Manhunter’. Kind of a niche thing to say, but he’s kind of the great genius of framing shots. I watch his films, and the way he frames shots makes my jaw drop over and over. Anyway, I’ll add ‘Manhunter’ to my knowledge. Thanks, pal. May your day speed or drift luxuriously by, whichever you prefer. ** Uday, That would be an amazing compliment. ‘The Weir of Hermiston’ is news to me. Huh interesting. Noted. Well, I hope you have the best kind of busy days betwixt now and our next meet up. ** Oscar 🌀, I have a quiet voice too. I think a cone would be best, although I do like what happens to voices when megaphones eat them. But with the bucolic setting, yes, cones of some sort. No, no, I still am a Character.AI virgin, only because a bunch of taxing shit is going on in the atmosphere of my life at the moment, and I know my dip into that realm is going to be a lengthy, foraging one. I’ll get there. Soon I’ll have the weekend. I was going to include that Márquez novel until I saw it’s being published controversially. I don’t know, seems kind of an ugly move to me, but maybe it’s super great? Not sure I’ll be reading it any time soon. I’d say getting yelled at by a cyclist is perhaps close enough. Thank you for that day wish, Given my miserably bad French, that would be quite a surprisingly and lovely turn of events. I hope AC/DC do a free concert in your neighborhood and haul you up on stage to sing ‘Highway to Hell’. I think that song might sound really interesting sung by someone with a quiet voice. ** Okay. Today’s post is one of those posts that needs no further introduction from me. See you tomorrow.

24 unfinished novelists

____________

Denton Welch‘s A Voice Through a Cloud was written largely during the final racking months before Welch’s heart gave out. Echoing his own tragedy, it is a lyric, rebellious plaint of pain, fear and despair. The novel is also devastating in ways Welch did not intend. It breaks down painfully towards the end as Welch’s physical condition became so dire that he was capable only of writing one sentence at a time, and the exertion of doing even this would exhaust and sicken him so severely he would need to lie very still for hours afterwards with a cold compress on his forehead until he regained the strength to add another sentence. The last few pages become insensible and the novel ends abruptly with Welch’s final, inconclusive thought.’ — Michael de la Noy

 

____________

The Splendor And Misery Of Bodies, Of Cities was intended as Samuel R. Delaney‘s sequel to his classic novel Stars In My Pocket Like Grains Of Sand, but it looks like it will never see the light of day. Asked recently if he would ever finish and publish the sequel, Delaney’s answer was “Probably not, I can’t say for sure. Again, I haven’t written it off entirely. I did write about 150 pages of it at some point. But a number of things had come up to undercut it. I’ve explained it many, many times, and don’t mind explaining it again. I was in a major relationship at that time, that kind of fueled the first volume, Stars In My Pocket Like Grains Of Sand. And that relationship broke up, and that was the beginning of the Eighties, at the same time the AIDS situation came in. A lot of it, as the diptych was originally planned out, was a celebration of lot of the stuff I saw at the time in the gay world. Sort of in allegorical form, a lot of that was being celebrated. There was a lot of the gay situation that made me rethink some of that, not in any kind of simplistic way, but in a fairly complicated way. So between the personal breakup, which was an eight-year relationship that came to ane nd, and the changes in the world situation, there were other things that sort of grabbed my interest more. That made the second one a little hard to go on. I still think there are some valid things to be said about it, in that second volume. And it’s quite… I’ve got two or three more books, that I really would like to write, and at this point, my books take me three to five years. So that’s 15 years, and I’m practically 70 years old. So I’ll be in my 80s when those books are done, and I don’t know whether I’m going to be writing anything, or even if I’m going to be here”.’ — io9

 

______________

‘Throughout Jane Bowles’s letters, the unceasing lament about not-writing, “I have decided not to become hysterical, however. If I cannot write my book, then I shall give up writing, that’s all. Then either suicide or another life. It is rather frightening to think of. I don’t believe I would commit suicide, though intellectually it seems the only way out.” The book, a novel entitled Out in the World about a character whose goal is to “bed like God”, a follow-up to Two Serious Ladies, went unfinished.’ — dabney

 

________________

Campo Santo is a hybrid volume, a posthumous act of packaging by W.G. Sebald’s German publisher Hanser.When Sebald died December 14, 2001, very shortly after the appearance of his fourth work of prose, Austerlitz, he apparently had not begun a new prose project. The crucial part of this book is the first section, which contains the four prose four pieces. After finishing The Rings of Saturn in the mid 1990s, Sebald, we are told, began a book on Corsica, which he eventually set aside in favor of Austerlitz. According to the editor of Campo Santo Sven Meyer, the Corsican fragments form the only new prose pieces by Sebald we are likely to see. The Corsican prose pieces in Campo Santo pose interesting questions for the reader of Sebald.The most obvious issue to me concerns the lack of images in the three main pieces. All four of Sebald’s full-length prose works employ images as an essential part of the “text.”But, with one exception, and that including an image not chosen by Sebald himself, the Corsican pieces are devoid of images. Was this going to be an unillustrated work or would Sebald have added images before finishing the manuscript?’ — Vertigo

 

_______________

‘When Dashiell Hammett died of lung cancer Jan. 10, 1961, at age 66, he was a broken man. The architect of the modern American crime novel and the author of five classic works, Hammett was nearly penniless at the time of his death, his income attached by the Internal Revenue Service, his health destroyed by a six-month stint in federal prison. Despite his fragile health, he smoked and drank heavily and was prone to alcoholic blackouts. As he grew older, he wrote less and drank more until, finally, he wrote not at all. In his letters, Hammett makes reference to dozens of novels in progress, books with titles such as Dead Man’s Friday, Toward Z and The Valley Sheep, all unfinished – or more likely never begun. The only incomplete Hammett novel for which any manuscript materials survives is The Secret Emperor. Working notes for The Secret Emperor, which was Hammett’s first, never-finished novel, show that it included elements he later used in The Maltese Falcon and The Glass Key.’ — Wallace Stroby

 

________________

‘Novelist Terry Pratchett died at his home from complications of Alzheimer’s disease on the morning of 12 March 2015. He was 66 years old. Pratchett left “an awful lot” of unfinished writing, including a new novel in his famous and popular Discworld series. Pratchett told Neil Gaiman that anything that he had been working on at the time of his death should be destroyed by a steamroller. On 25 August 2017, his assistant Rob Wilkins fulfilled this wish by crushing Pratchett’s hard drive under a steamroller at the Great Dorset Steam Fair.’ — Stephanie Convery

 

________________

Michael Chabon began writing Fountain City as a follow-up to his fine 1989 debut novel, The Mysteries of Pittsburgh. The story centered on an architect who dreamed of building the perfect baseball stadium. After five years, he gave up on the project. “Often when I sat down to work,” Chabon wrote later about the abandoned novel, “I would feel a cold hand take hold of something inside my belly and refuse to let go. It was the Hand of Dread. I ought to have heeded its grasp.” He also wrote in the margins of Fountain City: “A book itself threatens to kill its author repeatedly during its composition.” It was a novel, he added, that he could feel “erasing me, breaking me down, burying me alive, drowning me, kicking me down the stairs.” Upon abandoning the project, he immediately changed gears and wrote his next novel Wonder Boys in seven months.’ — A New Fiction Writers Forum

 

_____________

‘A sniper, a black man, situates himself by an upper-floor window overlooking a street filled with white police officers busy overseeing a protest march. He proceeds to shoot and kill as many of them as possible from his vantage point with a high-powered rifle, before the police deploy an even more powerful weapon to retaliate and end his killing spree. these events are taken from Chester Himes’s novel Plan B, which he started writing in the late 1960s and which was finally published posthumously, unfinished, in France in 1983, and not in the US until 1993. By the time Himes began Plan B he had grown tired of depicting scenes of disorganised violence, and increasingly struggled with the task of reconciling his detectives to the demands of upholding racist laws. With Plan B, he envisages what a violent black uprising might look like and what its consequences would be. In the novel the knockabout brutalities of his two detectives are replaced with acts of straightforward political intent. “If there must be violence,” Himes declared, “I believe it should be organised violence”.’ — The Conversation

 

______________

The Temple at Thatch was Evelyn Waugh’s first attempt at a novel, and its failure temporarily derailed him. Waugh began writing the book in 1924 during his final year as an undergraduate. The plot, according to diary entries, is largely autobiographical and based on the writer’s experiences at Oxford, with themes of madness and black magic. So what went wrong? In 1925 he gave the manuscript to his friend Harold Action, who criticized the book (Action later said: “It was an airy Firbankian trifle, totally unworthy of Evelyn, and I brutally told him so. It was a misfired jeu d’esprit.”). Waugh was so distraught that he burned the manuscript and went to the beach and started swimming out. In his biography, Waugh said: “Did I really intend to drown myself? That was certainly in my mind.” But a short way out, he was attacked by a jellyfish and swam back. For a while afterward, he stayed away from fiction writing, but soon returned.’ — PW

 

____________

‘In the early 1980s, I started an epistolary novel called The Plant. I published limited editions of the first three short volumes, giving them out to friends and relatives (folks who are usually but not always the same) as funky Christmas cards. I gave The Plant up not because I thought it was bad but because other projects intervened. At the time I quit, the work in progress was roughly 25,000 words long. It told the story of a sinister plant—sort of a vampire-vine—that takes over the offices of a paperback publishing company, offering financial success in trade for human sacrifices. The story struck me as both scary and funny.’ Stephen King

 

____________

Truman Capote signed the initial contract for the novel Answered Prayers on January 5, 1966 with Random House. This agreement provided a $25,000 advance with a stipulated delivery date of January 1, 1968. Distracted by the success of his “nonfiction novel,” In Cold Blood, the Black and White Ball, television projects, short pieces and increasing personal demons, Capote missed his 1968 deadline. In July 1969 the contract was renegotiated, granting a “substantially larger advance” in exchange for a trilogy to be delivered in January 1973. The delivery date was further delayed to January 1974 and September 1977. A final agreement in early 1980 would have yielded Capote $1,000,000 to have been paid only if he submitted the manuscript by March 1, 1981. This final deadline was not kept. Capote first envisioned Answered Prayers as an American analog to Marcel Proust’s Remembrance of Things Past that would come to be regarded as his masterwork.

‘In the years prior to his death, Capote frequently read chapters from Answered Prayers to friends at dinners, but such was his gift of storytelling that few could discern whether he was actually reading from a manuscript or improvising. He attempted to sell one of the chapters to Esquire sometime in the early 1980s but balked and feigned illness when an editor asked to see the story. Capote claimed that lover John O’Shea had absconded with “A Severe Insult to the Brain” in 1977 and sued for repossession, but he eventually reconciled with O’Shea and dropped the lawsuit. At least one Capote associate claims to have acted as a courier for the full manuscript. According to Joseph Fox, four of Capote’s friends claim to have read drafts of “Father Flanagan’s All-Night Nigger Queen Kosher Cafe” and “A Severe Insult to the Brain”. Capote regularly cited dialogue and plot points from these chapters in multiple conversations with Fox that never wavered or changed over the years. In his editor’s note, Fox “hesitantly” theorized that the two chapters did exist at one juncture but were destroyed by Capote in the 1980s.

‘Shortly before his death in 1984, Capote informed his friend Joanne Carson that he had finally finished Answered Prayers and was preparing to die in peace. Carson allegedly had read the three chapters prior to this date and described them as being “very long.” On the morning preceding his death, Capote handed a key to Carson for a safe deposit box or locker that contained the completed novel, stating that “the novel will be found when it wants to be found.” When Carson pressed Capote for a precise location, he offered a myriad of locations in various cities. An exhaustive search for the manuscript after Capote’s death yielded nothing.’ — PBS.org

 

________________

Seth Morgan wrote his first novel, the blistering Homeboy, during a brief layover between heroin habits. But despite a decent critical reception and a promising literary future, Seth jumped right back up on that horse. Maybe it was that five-figure advance on the paperback, burning a hole in his pocket. Shortly after the book’s release, Morgan died in a drunken bike wreck. His second novel, Mambo Mephiste, was by his own account to be the definitive Mardi Gras novel. But only a few chapters and a synopsis exist, rescued from his apartment before it was tossed by the neighborhood junkies.’ — litreactor.com

 

____________

Lana Del Rey posted to Instagram this week to tell fans that a backpack containing her laptop, hard drives and three cameras were stolen from her car in a Los Angeles robbery a few months ago. In a series of since-deleted videos shared to the singer-songwriter’s @honeymoon account that’ve been reposted by fans, she informed followers of the incident and revealed a 200-page novel manuscript, as well as various unfinished songs and personal camera footage, were among the items lost. “I had to remotely wipe the computer that had my 200-page novel for Simon & Schuster, which I didn’t have backed up on a cloud,” said Del Rey, 37, who noted that she doesn’t have access to “any cloud systems.”‘ — Jack Irvin

 

____________

Philip K Dick‘s last wife has reworked the novel the legendary science fiction author was working on when he died in 1982. Tessa Dick, who described her self-publication of The Owl in Daylight as a tribute to her former husband, was Dick’s fifth and final wife, marrying him in 1973. She told online magazine the Self-Publishing Review that her version of the novel was an attempt to express “the spirit” of Dick’s proposed book. Little is known about the novel, which Dick mentioned in a letter to his editor and agent. Very little material exists and it might be more accurate (if poor English!) to say that it is his unstarted novel. Tessa points out, Phil “spent months working out the plots for his novels” before committing them to paper: “The typing, however, is not the writing.” According to Tessa, the letter to Dick’s agent revealed plans to “have a great scientist design and build a computer system and then get trapped in its virtual reality. The computer would be so advanced that it developed human-like intelligence and rebelled against its frivolous purpose of managing a theme park”. The letter also mentioned Dante’s Inferno and the Faust legend, she said.’ — Science Fiction World

 

______________

The Buccaneers is the last novel written by Edith Wharton. The story is set in the 1870s, around the time Wharton was a young girl. It was unfinished at the time of her death in 1937 and published in that form in 1938. Wharton’s manuscript ends with Lizzy inviting Nan to a house party, to which Guy Thwaite has also been invited. The book was published in 1938 by Penguin Books in New York. After some time, Marion Mainwaring finished the novel, following Wharton’s detailed outline, in 1993. The novel received positive and negative reactions from critics. It was often referred to as the “unfinished novel”. The main questions asked by critics were: “Is this really her legacy?” and “Was there enough left of the book to publish in the first place?”‘ — Percy Hutchinson

 

_______________

Prince Jellyfish is an unpublished novel by American journalist and author Hunter S. Thompson. The novel was Thompson’s first, written around 1960 while he was in his early 20s and was working as a reporter for the Middletown Daily Record in New York State. Thompson had moved to Middletown from New York City, where he worked briefly as a copy boy for Time. Little is known about the book, although in Thompson’s obituary, The Guardian described it as “an autobiographical novel about a boy from Louisville, going to the big city and struggling against the dunces to make his way.” The book was rejected by a number of literary agents before Thompson moved briefly to Puerto Rico and then moved on to writing his next novel, The Rum Diary. The Rum Diary, too, was rejected by every literary agent to whom Thompson shopped it, and it remained unpublished until 1998, long after Thompson had become famous.’ – collaged

 

______________

‘The writer David Foster Wallace committed suicide on September 12th of last year. His wife, Karen Green, came home to find that he had hanged himself on the patio of their house, in Claremont, California. For many months, Wallace had been in a deep depression. The condition had first been diagnosed when he was an undergraduate at Amherst College, in the early eighties; ever since, he had taken medication to manage its symptoms. During this time, he produced two long novels, three collections of short stories, two books of essays and reporting, and Everything and More, a history of infinity. Wallace in his final hours had “…tidied up the manuscript of a novel he had been writing for over ten years so that his wife could find it. Below it, around it, inside his two computers, on old floppy disks in his drawers were hundreds of other pages—drafts, character sketches, notes to himself, fragments that had evaded his attempt to integrate them into the novel. The novel had numerous working titles, some of them including ‘Gliterrer’, ‘SJF’ (‘Sir John Feelgood’), ‘What is Peoria For?’, and ‘The Long Thing’, although he had settled on The Pale King. The drafts tell of a group of employees at an Internal Revenue Service center in Illinois, and how they deal with the tediousness of their work. The partial manuscript—which Little, Brown plans to publish next year—expands on the virtues of mindfulness and sustained concentration. Wallace was trying to write differently, but the path was not evident to him. “I think he didn’t want to do the old tricks people expected of him,” Karen Green, his wife, says. “But he had no idea what the new tricks would be.” The problem went beyond technique. The central issue for Wallace remained how to in his words give “CPR to those elements of what’s human and magical that still live and glow despite the times’ darkness. Really good fiction could have as dark a worldview as it wished, but it’d find a way both to depict this world and to illuminate the possibilities for being alive and human in it.”’ — collaged from various sources

 

_____________

Robert Musil worked on his monumental novel The Man Without Qualities for more than twenty years. Some of Musil’s working titles were The Gutters, Achilles (the original name of the main character Ulrich) or The Spy. Musil’s aim (and that of his main character, Ulrich) was to arrive at a synthesis between strict scientific fact and the mystical, which he refers to as “the hovering life.” He started in 1921 and spent the rest of his life writing it. When he died in 1942, the novel was not completed. The first two books were published in 1930, the last and unfinished one posthumously by his wife Martha in 1942. He worked on his novel almost every day, leaving his family in dire financial straits. The novel brought neither fame nor fortune to Musil or his family. This was one of the reasons why he felt bitter and unrecognized during the last two decades of his life. Musil thought he had many years of productive work ahead of him, when he could complete his great novel. But the author died suddenly of a cerebral hemorrhage, after an exercise session, on April 15, 1942. He was sixty-two years old. Critics speculate on the viability of Musil’s original conception. Some estimate the intended length of the work to be twice as long as the text Musil left behind. As published, the novel ends in a large section of drafts, notes, false-starts and forays written by Musil as he tried to work out the proper ending for his book. In the German edition, there is even a CD-ROM available that holds thousands of pages of alternative versions and drafts.’ — Ted Gioia, Exhuming Robert Musil

 

____________

‘A work in progress at the time of Piero Paolo Pasolini‘s murder, the novel Petrolio exists as a made up of a series of notes – some extended and polished narrative passages, others cryptic messages from the author to himself that consist of no more than a few words. At the novel’s center is Carlo, an oil executive who undergoes a profound personality split: Carlo 1 is a super-Machiavellian power monger; Carlo 2 lives only to satisfy his perverse and insatiable sexual desires. Carlo also experiences a sexual metamorphosis in which he becomes, at will, female. The story of Carlo is interspersed with re-visions of myth – Oedipus, Medea, the Argonauts – and of Dante’s hell. The teller of this story appears to have been intended to be dual in nature. There is the author – the external shaper of the novel – who interrupts the text to comment on its mechanics and its meaning. And there is the narrator, whose cynical and seductive perspective comes from within Petrolio’s fictional world. Fragmentary, deliberately self-referential, meta-literary, schizoid, a devotional exploration of the male libido, an ode to the lust for power and the power of lust and, above all, a failed, piecemeal by default yet wrenching attempt to define the intellectual and his responsibilities.’ — The Grand Continent

 

______________

Jim Carroll, the legendary Manhattan poet and punk rocker, died of a heart attack on Friday, Sept. 12, at the age of 60. Recently, Carroll, the author of The Basketball Diaries, had been working on a new novel called Triptych; his longtime editor at Penguin, Paul Slovak, said that it “tells the story of a hermetic and mystical 35-year-old painter who becomes kind of a golden boy in the late ’80s New York art world. It’s a very moving examination of spiritual bankruptcy and other themes in both art and life.” Mr. Slovak said Carroll had turned in revisions of the first two parts of the novel, but didn’t know how far he’d gotten on the third. He said it was possible something would come of the work, pending a conversation with Carroll’s literary agent, Betsy Lerner, but that it was too soon to tell.’ — The New York Observer

 

_______________

Richard Yates wrote at least three masterpieces: Revolutionary Road, Easter Parade (clearly recognized seminal novels of America in the second half of the 20th Century), and Eleven Kinds of Loneliness, a superb collection of his early short stories. Yates was a kind of F. Fitzgerald of the 1960’s, writing novels and story volumes about doomed post-WWII idealists colliding with reality. Yates’ first books were hailed, but his later efforts received mixed reviews, and were seldom read. He kept at his trade through illness, nervous breakdowns, and drink by editors like Sam Lawrence at Delacorte and Esquire’s Gordon Lish. Yates also wrote speeches for Bobby Kennedy, and taught creative writing at the University of Iowa. When the hard drinking, heavy smoking Yates died of emphysema in 1992, at the age of 66, none of his books remained in print. In the last month of his life, Richard Yates was working against deadline to finish his final (never completed andas yet unpublished) novel, Uncertain Times, based on his experience with Bobby Kennedy. He was in a skid row room (the kind he preferred to live and work in), surrounded by dead cockroaches he killed on work breaks, breathing oxygen for his emphysema from a huge canister, still smoking.’ — Zimbio

 

______________

Woes of the True Policeman is a project that was begun at the end of the 1980s and continued until Robert Bolaño’s death. A version of the novel was eventually published consisting sections collated from typescripts and computer documents. In a 1995 letter, Bolaño wrote: “Novel: for years I’ve been working on one that’s titled Woes of the True Policeman and which is MY NOVEL. The protagonist is a widower, 50, a university professor, 17-year-old daughter, who goes to live in Santa Teresa, a city near the U.S. border. Eight hundred thousand pages, a crazy tangle beyond anyone’s comprehension.” The unusual thing about this novel, written over the course of fifteen years, is that it incorporated material from other works by the author, from Llamadas telefónicas (Phone Calls) to The Savage Detectives and 2666, with the peculiarity that even though it features some familiar characters, they belong to Bolaño’s larger fictional world, and at the same time they are the exclusive property of this novel. The novel’s remains exuded a strong consciousness of death, of writing as an act of life, which was part of Bolaño’s biography, since the Chilean writer was condemned to write his limitless fiction against the clock.’ — Works in Progress

 

______________

Nikolay Gogol began writing Dead Souls in 1836 while living in Paris, finishing the first volume in 1841 while on a visit to Rome. After returning to Russia in October, Gogol, with the help of the critic Vissarion Belinsky, printed the first volume in 1842. Belinsky called it a “deeply intellectual, social and historic work.” The work on the second tome of Dead Souls coincided with Gogol’s deep spiritual crisis and mainly reflected his doubt on the effectiveness of literature, putting him on the edge of denouncing his previous creations. In 1849-1850, Gogol read parts of the second volume of Dead Souls to his friends. Their approval and delight encouraged him to work twice as hard. In spring, he made his first and only attempt to create a family. He proposed to Anna Wielhorski, who turned him down. On 1 January 1852 Gogol informed everyone that the second volume was “completely finished.” But at the end of the month, signs of a new personality crisis appeared. He was tormented by a sense of approaching death, worsened by new doubts in his success as a writer. On 7 February Gogol confessed and took communion and on the night of 12 February he burnt the clean manuscript of the second volume of Dead Souls. Only five unfinished chapters remained from various draft editions, which were published in 1855. On the morning of 21 February Gogol died in his apartment in Moscow.’ — Russia Now

 

______________

Sylvia Plath is known primarily for her Pulitzer Prize-winning poetry. However, She also wrote short stories and journals that were later posthumously published in both abridged and unabridged formats, and a novel, The Bell Jar, using the pseudonym Victoria Lucas. It was published under her real name posthumously. However, this is not the only one she wrote. One novel, Falcon Yard, was burned by Sylvia Plath herself. Double Exposure is said to have disappeared in 1970, and her last two journals are said to be missing or destroyed by her husband Ted Hughes. Double Exposure was a novel for which little is known. Like The Bell Jar, it was reportedly going to be semi-autobiographical. Ted Hughes has cited figures of 60 or 70 pages up to as high as 130 pages. Plath’s literary executor, Olwyn Hughes, said only two chapters were completed. The plot was said to revolve around a woman discovering her husband having an affair culminating in the husband’s desertion of his family. Plath said it was a “dark comedy.”‘ — scholarworks

Some others

Gustave Flaubert Bouvard et Pécuchet
René Daumal Mount Analogue
Lew Welch I, Leo
Thomas Mann Confessions of Felix Krull
James Joyce Stephen Hero
Mina Loy Goy Israels
Ralph Ellison Three Days Before the Shooting
Brad Gooch The Silver Age of Death
Dale Peck Red Deer
Frank O’Hara (untitled)
Albert Camus Le premier homme
Herman Melville The Confidence Man
Henry James A Sense of Time
Ingeborg Bachmann The Book of Franza
Georges Perec 53 Days
Jack Kerouac Old Bull in the Bowery
Alain-Fournier Colombe Blanchet
Stendahl Lucien Leuwen
Robert Shea Children of the Earthmaker
James Dickey Crux
Alexander Pushkin The Negro of Peter the Great
Charles Bukowski The Way the Dead Love
Kingsley Amis Black and White
Fyodor Dostoevsky Netochka Nezvanova
Georges Bataille Ma Mere
Joe Orton Head to Toe
Alberto Moravia I due amici
Osamu Dazai Gutto Bai
—-

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** James Bennett, Hey, James. I think it’s highly possible to get a lot out of Bangs and Meltzer by just sticking to the prose and the passion/dispassion and making assumptions about the topics. It always amazes me to know that Flaubert wasn’t a critical establishment darling in his day. A hopeful sign. I’ve only been to Cork in Ireland. There was a kind of seminar on my work there that I attended. I don’t know why I haven’t made the effort to get to Ireland otherwise  since it’s so close to where I’ve ended up and in the EU, for goodness sake, so hassle free to enter/exit. Recommendations? Because I really should target it. Hug of considerable warmth back to you. Oh, and Uday asked me to convey his thanks because he doesn’t know to use the reply function. ** Lucas, Hi, Lucas. Thanks, yeah, I’m post-stress today. It was just a thing. I’m happy I got you revved up for the amusement park. Hopefully the hopeful attitude will add some romance to the place when you’re actually there too. I’m on the cusp of digging into the character ai. Hopefully after I get an annoying meeting done this morning. Thank you for the link. I’m not on X, and X is very fascist about not letting non-X people look at anything there, sadly. That’s very interesting about the stronger taboo amongst the currently young driving the ai option. Huh. I wish I understood why those taboos have taken hold of people, but I can’t, or not without further research, which I’ll do. Such a huge difference from the hunger for the wild that was considered cool when I came of age. Zac happily liked what I wrote, so now we can continue building the script, so that’s exciting. I’m really jonesing to get a new film on its way. Making films is strangely addictive. I have some artist friends who work a lot with ai visual generating apps like Midjourney, and it’s the same thing with no sexual content. They try, but when they try to circumvent the rules and get sexy, it just looks very hint-hint 1950s. Gigantically positive vibes are on their way to you. What are you up to, life-wise, at the moment? Oh, jay talked to/about you in their comment if you didn’t see. ** jay, Hi. Big congrats on being post-school for at least a while. Do you have a particular summer in mind? I may actually take you up on your advice offer one of these days. I think people think because I do the blog I have tech savvy, but I’m really just very basic and feeling my way along. Thanks! Have a Thursday of note. ** Jeff J, Howdy, Jeff! I saw on FB that you were back in your hood. How great that you had such an awesome time after all that body rebellion you were going through. Funny you mention Pasolini’s novel given what’s above. No, I haven’t. Making the post made me realise I need to. Did your friend have any tips on where to start? Wow, I did not know that about a new Pinget! Holy shit. Or that Dalkey is actually back alive like they had seemed to be promising. Whoa, I’ll get the Pinget asap, and the Queneau too. Thanks, buddy. The film is finished but for the minor, needed special effects which Zac and I have been waiting to do for months, thwarted by our producers, but we intend to force the issue at a meeting with them this very morning. Otherwise, it’s under consideration at four big festivals. Two are maybe hopeful, two are very unlikely. Sure, Zooming sounds good. Hit me up. ** Black_Acrylic, Cool, thanks, Ben. ‘Fargo’ is my favorite Coens for sure. Lightning in a bottle, that one. ** Huckleberry Shelf, Hey!! You studied with David! That’s awesome. You probably know he and I are very old friends and colleagues, although colleagues is such a boring term. He let you use that Ouija board! He must really like you. That makes sense re: your attitude towards the sun being from SF. I’m from LA, so escaping the sun still feels like a success story. Although I lived in Amsterdam for a couple of years, and Amsterdam is like SF to the nth degree, and that was too non-stop gloomy even for me. Great that you’re writing. And ‘hopefully’, that’s the key. I totally get your interest in your work feeding off the Craigslist source. Your story idea sounds great, of course. I learned how to write prose as a poet, and it actually seemed like a really good way into prose, so keep your hopes and trust your instincts, and you’ll likely come up with something really yours and unique. I actually just read a very positive review of the Cronenberg yesterday. I feel like a lot of people just want him to stay on the body horror track, but most of my favorite films by him are when he diverges from that. My pleasure about the post, of course. I hope your day holds some amazement. ** Tomás, Hi, Tomás! Wow, to fully explain the sculpture influence would take more room and brain power than the p.s. pacing allows. At the simplest, I try to think of my fiction, and fiction I read as well, as being 3-dimensional. That there’s the surface, which does certain things and can have a certain effect, but there’s also a roomy interior where I can try to make things happen that the reader can either notice and follow or which enlarges the reading even if you don’t see the internal machinations. I like to try to write thinking of the prose as something you can sort of walk around and view from difference angles. It helps me get excited about the possibilities. That probably makes no sense. Consolidation problem. And also thinking about positive and negative space, so what’s written and there and solid is no more important than what’s missing. Someday let’s have a coffee and talk about our methodologies. That would be super interesting. What you say about your thinking about your writing makes total sense to me, and maybe is not so difference than my thinking that I just confusedly attempted to describe. I don’t have a daily routine about approaching films. Or about my fiction either. I’m kind of a workaholic. Once I get my head inside a project, I get very fixed on it and driven to finish it. And I try hard not think about the hellish part of getting the funds to actually make the film because that’s so daunting and beyond my control. Thanks very, very much for the links to your work. I’ll go over there(s) today when I finish this and get through a film-related meeting I’m due at shortly. Excited to find your work. Thanks again! ** Harper, Hi. Your name is clean again. ‘Accidental postmodern’, ha ha, nice. That doesn’t surprise me about Pratt. It’s interesting to have a bead on what his stoicism thing is about. Parisians don’t have AC in their homes either. Like you guys, I guess, there was no real need until about five years ago when Paris started cooking in the summer. Ugh. Enjoy your calm. I hope it extends and extends. ** Steve, Troye Sivan is so not otherworldly looking. Well, neither is Chalamet, of course, although hordes would troll me for that statement if hordes read this blog, which happily they don’t. Everyone, Steve has weighed in one Richard Linklater’s new one ‘Hit Man’ right here. A couple of the Cannes films have already opened. Paris holds an annual little festival where most of the Cannes films play for one screening each, so that’s next in a few weeks. ** PL, Hi, good to see you. Dump stories are both inherently interesting and not so much, straight or otherwise, I was interested. That guy in that group you describe does sound like a character I might devise, or at least like a slave on a slave site whose profile I would put in one of those posts. I obviously can stand guys like that and find them interesting. I like the combination of trashiness and pretension. There can be a lot going on there. It’s just a matter of regulating the real life dosage of them, I guess. But, yeah, get out of the group if the cops are eyeing its doorway. Better safe than whatever else. Hm, I can’t think of any great musical finds of recent days. I need to go looking. I’ll check out that Panchiko album, thanks. I’m good. You sound lively. Nice to get to talk with you. ** Justin D, Hi, J. Cool, glad you’re liking his stuff so far. I do remember about your Koi feeding gig, and that’s a strange outcome. The fountain being empty sounds a little odd, no? Alien abduction maybe? I hope the owners don’t blame you. Yikes. I’m an overanalyser too. I think, push comes to shove, that’s preferable than, say, airheadedness, although airheadedness has external beauty at least, unlike the overanalysis-beset. Mostly. Sometimes. ** Jamie F, Greetings, Jamie. Cool, happy Scott’s stuff intrigues. I am confident, I think, but much less so in crowds, or disorganised ones at least. I’ve figured out how to deal with, say, doing readings or events when my work is ‘on show’ because I can just becomes its spokesperson, and I’ve learned how to do that. But generally I’m not so good at adopting a kind of superfice of personality to negotiate groups of folks. Or something. I don’t know. No, Zac isn’t my boyfriend. We’re very close, and we’re kind of soul mates, but it’s not romantic or sexual at all. Bon day. ** Darby🐼, There was a parrot in a box. My roommate found it injured in a park, brought it here, washed it, put it in a box, and it eventually felt better, started freaking out, and yesterday it was successfully released into the park. Happy ending. Google wouldn’t let me see the photo. It says I don’t have access. So, … I’ll daydream. In purple. Fucking google, I swear. I hope your classes are enriching and that your screen does not irritate. ** Nicholas, Hey there. Uh, last night I had very delicious vegan sushi at this new vegan sushi restaurant I found. And today … my food intake is still a crapshoot. Nothing fancy for sure. Your intake sounds enviable. Yes. ** Uday, Hi. I actually swore off using one word titles after the Cycle, and I’m kind of shocked that I agreed with myself to use one again. But it fits. I think the editor of TPR at that time was kind of a perv, and he got me-tooed and fired later, so there you go. Oh, yeah, everybody has their own powers from their art or skills or beauty or age or whatever, and individualist hierarchies are natural in that case, I guess as long as the bearer doesn’t work the hierarchy. Hierarchies are something I’ll be negotiating forever. They’re inescapable. And I conveyed your thanks to James. ** Oscar 🌀, I’m imagining us on adjacent mountaintops with our hands cupped around our mouths. ‘Whump’: what a nice category or at least word. Underused, that word. I’m going to start using it. Listen, I’m so happy my early writings were pre-internet and are just yellowed papers that are evermore yellowing and increasingly unreadable. ‘Naïve. Super.’: I’m going to try to locate that. In the meantime, I will pick up one of the zillion of books in my to-read pile and hope it’s keeper as you wish, thank you. I hope someone with very baggy jeans crosses your path today and asks you to autograph their skateboard. ** Okay. Sorry this is so late today. A meeting interrupted me. A few of the examples up above in the post are rather well known already, but what the hell, right? See you tomorrow.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 DC's

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑