The blog of author Dennis Cooper

Month: October 2022 (Page 5 of 7)

Spotlight on … Shirley Jackson The Haunting of Hill House (1959) *

* (restored/Halloween countdown post #11)
—-

 

‘I have always loved to use fear, to take it and comprehend it and make it work and consolidate a situation where I was afraid and take it whole and work from there…I delight in what I fear.’ — Shirley Jackson

‘North Bennington is a tiny village less than a mile from the otherwise isolated Bennington campus in Vermont. Shirley Jackson was married to Stanley Edgar Hyman, a literary critic who taught at the college. And she spent her life in the town, raising four children, presiding over a chaotic household that was host to Ralph Ellison, Bernard Malamud and Howard Nemerov, and at times going quietly crazy — and writing, always, with the rigor of one who has found her born task. Six novels, two bestselling volumes of deceptively sunny family memoirs and countless stories before her death at 48, in 1965.

‘Jackson was in many senses already two people when she arrived in Vermont. One was a turgid, fearful ugly-duckling, permanently cowed by the severity of her upbringing by a suburban mother obsessed with appearances. This half of Jackson was a character she brought brilliantly to life in her stories and novels from the beginning: the shy girl, whose identity slips all too easily from its foundations. The other half of Jackson was the expulsive iconoclast, brought out of her shell by marriage to Hyman — himself a garrulous egoist very much in the tradition of Jewish ’50’s New York intellectuals — and by the visceral shock of mothering a quartet of noisy, demanding babies. This second Shirley Jackson dedicated herself to rejecting her mother’s sense of propriety, drank and smoked and fed to buttery excess — directly to blame for her and her husband’s early deaths — dabbled in magic and voodoo, and interfered loudly when she thought the provincial Vermont schools were doing an injustice to her talented children. This was the Shirley Jackson that the town feared, resented and, depending on whose version you believe, occasionally persecuted.

‘The hostility of the villagers further shaped her psyche, and her art; the process eventually redoubled so the latter fed the former. After the enormous success of “The Lottery,” a legend arose in town, almost certainly false, that Jackson had been pelted with stones by schoolchildren one day, then gone home and written the story. The real crisis came near the end of her life, resulting in a period of agoraphobia and psychosis; she wrote her way through it in We Have Always Lived in the Castle. In that novel, Jackson brilliantly isolates the two aspects in her psyche into two odd, damaged sisters: one hypersensitive and afraid, unable to leave the house, the other a sort of squalid demon prankster who may or may not have murdered the rest of her family for her fragile sister’s sake.

‘Shirley Jackson wrote about the mundane evils hidden in everyday life and about the warring and subsuming of selves in a family, a community and sometimes even in a single mind. She wrote about prejudice, neurosis and identity. An unfortunate impression persists (one Jackson encouraged, for complicated reasons) that her work is full of ghosts and witches. In truth, few of her greatest stories and just one of her novels, The Haunting of Hill House, contain a suggestion of genuinely supernatural events. Jackson’s forté was psychology and society, people in other words — people disturbed, dispossessed, misunderstanding or thwarting one another compulsively, people colluding absently in monstrous acts. She had a jeweler’s eye for the microscopic degrees by which a personality creeps into madness or a relationship turns from dependence to exploitation. Judy Oppenheimer’s fine 1988 biography of Jackson is called Private Demons, but it could have been called Little Murders.— Jonathan Lethem, Salon

 

 

______
Further

Shirley Jackson: The Full Wiki
A modest Shirley Jackson resource page
‘Shirley Jackson’s The Haunting of Hill House: An Introduction’
‘Shirley Jackson: House and Guardians’
‘SHIRLEY JACKSON: Delight in What I Fear’
‘The Witchcraft of Shirley Jackson’
‘The Haunting of Hill House’ by Shirley Jackson: The Paperback Covers’
Shirley Jackson @ Goodreads
Buy Shirley Jackson’s books

 

__________
The Sketches

‘Shirley Jackson’s great-great-grandfather, Samuel Bugbee, designed beautiful Nob Hill mansions, and her grandfather was a prominent San Francisco architect as well. Jackson was sufficiently imbued with an architect’s brain to draw rough schematics for the houses in her fiction, unbuildable but detailed enough to guide her thinking about which rooms Eleanor would run through to reach the tower in The Haunting of Hill House’s penultimate scene. These drawings, found in Jackson’s papers at The Library of Congress, inspire a particular form of creative thinking and planning. Rather than creating a structure for a world of words, Jackson envisions structures that she will then use words to describe.’ — Susan Scarf Merrell, Writers’ Houses

 

___________
Remembrance

 

‘Forgotten now as a writer, Stanley Edgar Hyman — a brash, blunt, myopic polymath, blimpish in form and bearded, we thought, at birth — was once a boy-wonder: a New Yorker staffer at 24 and a literary critic whose forte was the exploration of figurative language. Stanley Hyman was also the most popular teacher in a school which prided itself (shades of Miss Jean Brodie) on being in the prime of life: a dramatic experiment in female education in full bloom. Even the 300 acre country campus –- hay fields and spiky marsh grasses, cow and carriage barns, apple orchards, and a brooding greystone mansion — radiated the sense of privilege that came with being the right place at the right time …

‘Stanley’s wife -– and that’s how we thought of her -– was the writer Shirley Jackson. The first thing you heard about Shirley Jackson was that she was a witch. Shirley tacitly encouraged this rumor, although the evidence supporting it would have been admissible only in Salem, Massachusetts in 1692. Shirley had written a book about witchcraft; she was known to “read” Tarot cards; she inserted into her exquisitely written fictions quotations from her large collection of grimoires and magic books; and she gave to some of her many cats -– eleven cats! they must be her familiars! — the names of the dukes and demons of Hell.

‘Shirley was a wide pale woman with a face like a baleful moon. Her fine skin glowed with a pallor that looked unhealthy even in a climate cold enough for “winter white” to be a seasonal description of a woman’s complexion. Her hair was sandy, lank, and raked back in a bun from which wisps and hanks always escaped. Her eyes were alive (as Stanley’s were not) and protected by large unfashionable glasses, but they were like windows whose shades had been pulled down. Light shone behind them, but not for us. Shirley gave the impression of never wanting to mix with her husband’s students. She had her reasons.

‘Shirley was even bulkier than Stanley, and so, naturally, the Hyman family car was the smallest possible Volkswagen bug. Shirley was the chauffeur -– Stanley never did anything practical if he could help it -– and on-campus sightings of the two of them struggling to enter and exit their tiny vehicle were highly prized. One night, I watched Shirley and Stanley try to walk through a wide-open auditorium doorway side by side. They wedged together in the doorjamb for an awful moment; then Stanley, decisive as ever, burst free.’ — Joan Schenkar, Wall Street Journal

 

____________
SJ at the Movies


The 1963 movie based on ‘THoHH’


The 1999 movie based on ‘THoHH’ – Trailer


Excerpt from a film based on ‘We Have Always Lived in the Castle’


A 1969 short film based on Shirley Jackson’s ‘The Lottery’

 

_____
Interview

 

I still remember the day we were assigned to do a research paper on a piece of literature we had read in my English 198 class. The story I chose to write my paper on was “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson, it was one of my favorites. Luckily for me Mrs. Jackson lived in my neighborhood and my parents were friends with her and her husband. So I knew it would not be difficult to set up an interview with her for my research paper. One day after getting home from school, I met my mother in the living room so I told her that I was doing a research paper on Mrs. Jackson and asked if she could set up an interview for me. The following day I was thrilled to hear that my mom had successfully arranged for me to have my interview.

On the day of the interview I walked to Mrs. Jackson’s home, it was only about five minutes away from my home. I remember feeling a bit nervous as I pressed the door bell, within a couple of seconds Mrs. Jackson opened the door and welcomed me with a beautiful smile. As we walked towards the parlor she asked how my parents were doing, I told her they were doing fine. After that she asked me if I was thirsty, I kindly said I was not. She paused for a few seconds than told me to begin.

Interviewer: Mrs. Jackson, thank you for agreeing to do this interview. I have a couple of questions to ask.

Mrs. Jackson: You’re welcome, so what would you like to know?
Interviewer: To start off, where were you born? And did you grow up there?

Mrs. Jackson: I was born in San Francisco. No, I actually grew up in California.

Interviewer: were you interested in writing as a child? Or was it something you developed later in life?

Mrs. Jackson: I became interested in writing at an early age. I actually won my first poetry prize when I was twelve. Later on in high school I kept a diary to record my writing progress.

Interviewer: That’s very interesting. Have you ever used a place you have lived in as a setting for any of your works?

Mrs. Jackson: Yes, in my first novel the setting was based on Burlingame, a suburb I lived in, in San Francisco.

After my first set of questions Mrs. Jackson asked if we could take a break, she than walked into the kitchen. While I was by myself in the parlor, I noticed some family pictures on the wall and next to them were some of the awards she had won for her works. When she returned from the kitchen, she brought some sandwiches and drinks. I took a sip of orange juice then continued with the interview.

Interviewer: In “The Lottery” what point were you trying to make by having the villagers stone one of their members.

Mrs. Jackson: I wanted to dramatize graphically the pointless violence in people’s lives, to reveal the general inhumanity of man.

Interviewer: I see. As I read the story in school, I realized that the lottery was a means of finding a sacrifice for the season’s harvest. Is that the only thing the lottery is supposed to represent?

Mrs. Jackson: That’s the main thing it represents. However, it also illustrates how societies tend to hold onto traditions, even meaningless ones, revealing our need for ritual and belonging.

Interviewer: Finally Mrs. Jackson, what message are you trying to get across to the public with this story?

Mrs. Jackson: I want people to learn that, “custom and law, when sanctioned by a selfish, unthinking populace, can bring an otherwise democratic and seemingly just society to the brink of paganism”.

Interviewer: That’s very interesting. Well Mrs. Jackson, I think I have enough information. Thank you for allowing me to interview you.

When we finished the interview Mrs. Jackson walked me to the door, I thanked her again for her time, than I started to head back home. When I got home and began to write my paper, I was just amazed at how fortunate I was, to have the author of one of the stories I read in school as a neighbor. The next week of school I got my graded paper and I was not surprised by my grade. I smiled as I read all the positive remarks my teacher had written down about my paper.

 

____
Book

Shirley Jackson The Haunting of Hill House

Penguin

‘Shirley Jackson’s The Haunting of Hill House has unnerved readers since its original publication in 1959. A tale of subtle, psychological terror, it has earned its place as one of the significant haunted house stories of the ages.

Eleanor Vance has always been a loner–shy, vulnerable, and bitterly resentful of the 11 years she lost while nursing her dying mother. “She had spent so long alone, with no one to love, that it was difficult for her to talk, even casually, to another person without self-consciousness and an awkward inability to find words.” Eleanor has always sensed that one day something big would happen, and one day it does. She receives an unusual invitation from Dr. John Montague, a man fascinated by “supernatural manifestations.” He organizes a ghost watch, inviting people who have been touched by otherworldly events. A paranormal incident from Eleanor’s childhood qualifies her to be a part of Montague’s bizarre study–along with headstrong Theodora, his assistant, and Luke, a well-to-do aristocrat. They meet at Hill House — a notorious estate in New England.

‘Hill House is a foreboding structure of towers, buttresses, Gothic spires, gargoyles, strange angles, and rooms within rooms — a place “without kindness, never meant to be lived in ….” Although Eleanor’s initial reaction is to flee, the house has a mesmerizing effect, and she begins to feel a strange kind of bliss that entices her to stay. Eleanor is a magnet for the supernatural — she hears deathly wails, feels terrible chills, and sees ghostly apparitions. Once again she feels isolated and alone — neither Theo nor Luke attract so much eerie company. But the physical horror of Hill House is always subtle; more disturbing is the emotional torment Eleanor endures. Intense, literary, and harrowing, The Haunting of Hill House belongs in the same dark league as Henry James’s classic ghost story, The Turn of the Screw.’ — Naomi Gesinger

______
Excerpts

No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions of absolute reality; even larks and katydids are supposed, by some, to dream. Hill House, not sane, stood by itself against its hills, holding darkness within; it had stood so for eighty years and might stand for eighty more. Within, walls continued upright, bricks met neatly, floors were firm, and doors were sensibly shut; silence lay steadily against the wood and stone of Hill House, and whatever walked there, walked alone.

Dr. John Montague was a doctor of philosophy; he had taken his degree in anthropology, feeling obscurely that in this field he might come closest to his true vocation, the analysis of supernatural manifestations. He was scrupulous about the use of his title because, his investigations being so utterly unscientific, he hoped to borrow an air of respectability, even scholarly authority, from his education. It had cost him a good deal, in money and pride, since he was not a begging man, to rent Hill House for three months, but he expected absolutely to be compensated for his pains by the sensation following upon the publication of his definitive work on the causes and effects of psychic disturbances in a house commonly known as “haunted.” He had been looking for an honestly haunted house all his life. When he heard of Hill House he had been at first doubtful, then hopeful, then indefatigable; he was not the man to let go of Hill House once he had found it.

*

Eleanor Vance was thirty-two years old when she came to Hill House. The only person in the world she genuinely hated, now that her mother was dead, was her sister. She disliked her brother-in-law and her five year old niece, and she had no friends.

*

It started again, as though it had been listening, waiting to hear their voices and what they said, to identify them, to know how well prepared they were against it, waiting to hear if they were afraid. So suddenly that Eleanor leaped back against the bed and Theodora gasped and cried out, the iron crash came against their door, and both of them lifted their eyes in horror, because the hammering was against the upper edge of the door, higher than either of the them could reach, higher than Luke or the doctor could reach, and the sickening, degrading cold came in waves from whatever was outside the door.

Eleanor stood perfectly still and looked at the door. She did not quite know what to do, although she believed that she was thinking coherently and was not unusually frightened, not more frightened, certainly, than she had believed in her worst dreams she could be. The cold troubled her even more than the sounds; even Theodora’s warm robe was useless against the icy little curls of fingers on her back. The intelligent thing to do, perhaps, was to walk over and open the door; that, perhaps, would belong with the doctor’s views of pure scientific inquiry. Eleanor knew that, even if her feet would take her as far as the door, her hand would not lift to the doorknob; impartially, remotely, she told herself that no one’s hand would touch that knob; it’s not the work hands were made for, she told herself. She had been rocking a little, each crash against the door pushing her a little backward, and now she was still because the noise was fading. “I’m going to complain to the janitor about the radiators,” Theodora said from behind her. “Is it stopping?”

“No,” Eleanor said, sick. “No.”

It had found them. Since Eleanor would not open the door, it was going to make its way in. Eleanor said aloud, “Now I know why people scream, because I think I’m going to,” and Theodora said, “I will if you will.”and laughed so that Eleanor turned quickly back to the bed and they held each other, listening in silence. Little pattings came from around the doorframe, small seeking sounds, feeling the edges of the door, trying to sneak a way in. The doorknob was fondled, and Eleanor, whispering, said, “Is it locked?” and Theodora nodded and then, wide-eyed, turned to stare at the connecting bathroom door. “Mine’s locked too,” Eleanor said against her ear, and Theodora closed her eyes in relief. The little sticky sounds moved on around the doorframe and then, as though a fury caught whatever was outside, the crashing came again, and Eleanor and Theodora saw the wood of the door tremble and shake, and the door move against its hinges.

“You can’t get in,” Eleanor said wildly, and again there was silence, as though the house listened with attention to her words, understanding, cynically agreeing, content to wait. A thin little giggle came, in a breath of air through the room, a little mad rising laugh, the smallest whisper of a laugh, and Eleanor heard it all up and down her back, a little gloating laugh moving past them around the house, and then she heard the doctor and Luke calling from the stairs and, mercifully, it was over.

—-

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** David Ehrenstein, Hi, David. Your link didn’t work, but, based on the prompt, I’m strongly guessing it had something to do with Sondheim? ** Dominik, Hi!!! My favorites? Oh, wow, uh … I like Sean Landers’ trees, the Martian language thing is interesting, the Jesse Howard things, and I love Frances Stark always, so maybe them? LA plans: lots of interviewing prospective crew and collaborators, finding the house location (top priority), auditioning actors, figuring out the exact amount of money we need, deciding precisely when we’ll shoot the film, and tons and tons of haunted house attractions!!!! I kind of worship Mexican food, or my tongue does, and Zac just found this new Mexican food place in the 11th arr, and we ate there last night, and it’s the best Mexican food in Paris by a million miles, so now I have a place to sate my cravings in-between US trips! I would say love has excellent taste in both tattoos and their placement. Love making Destroyer wander around in the audience of his gig that I’m attending tonight so I can thank him in person for letting Zac and me use his song for free in ‘Permanent Green Light’, G. ** _Black_Acrylic, It’s true, right? I didn’t know there was a film about Wain. Starring Benedict Cumberbatch? Urgh. ** Sypha, I thought Louis Wain might lure you into the blog’s VIP room. Awesome! Everyone, the mighty writer James Champagne, best known around here by his local moniker Sypha, wrote a piece about one of yesterday’s ‘Words’ stars Louis Wain for the late, great Yuck ‘n’ Yum zine years ago that I can guarantee is a killer read, so do think about being killed in the good way by it by clicking this. Me neither about that martian language person. So interesting, no? Use it! I think she’s very dead and won’t mind. ** Steve Erickson, Oh, poor, poor you for having had your mind picture said speculative film, although, okay, it does have camp classic pre-written all over it. There really is a lot of posthumous Mark Fisher popping up, isn’t there? Nice in the obvious way, but yeah. ‘Jack Bauer’s Tulpa’! What a title. A lot to live up there, bud. ** Robert, Thanks a bunch. I’m assuming the is-it-or-is-it-not-sentimental effect is intentional, or I was hoping so. Yeah, man, I get in those states. I think it’s like the necessary rough patches that make writers tough enough to forge ahead with their difficult life decision or something? I read Emily Dickinson in high school, like I guess all teens do, and I was like, blah, old stuff, I don’t care, but then I tried reading her years later, and it was, like, holy shit, she’s completely radical and amazing. Yeah, she was quite something style-wise, externally and inside. How’s Friday? ** Okay. I decided to bring some rare class to the Halloween countdown and restore this old, formerly dead post about Shirley Jackson’s great and spooky novel. See you tomorrow.

Words 2

____________
Sean Landers Various, 2017-2018
‘In the beginning was the word and the word got fleshed out. That would be the opening line in Sean Landers’s version of his Bible, were he to write one. It would be a kind of secular new testimony because, for him, language is the medium and the message. When I say, the word gets “fleshed out,” I mean it literally. Both his written paintings and [sic], his quasi-fictional, quasi-factual Bildungsroman, are overflowing with the pleasures and the anxieties of the flesh. He presents himself as two characters, one who is a writing self and the other a fictive self, and together they tell the story of Sean Landers. He says the fictive persona not only makes things more interesting, but it also provides him “with a fig leaf to hide behind.” There are occasions when that cover falls off and he ends up being full-on leafless. His early videos and language paintings are delightfully outrageous acts of exposure. Were he to make one, his philosophical declaration would be Discoperio ergo sum. The translation goes something like, “I uncover and lay bare; therefore I am.”’

 

____________
Jillian Mayer You’ll Be Okay, 2014
You’ll Be Okay is a 4 minute looping animation of the title’s reassuring text written against a background of white clouds in a blue sky, composed to appear as if a skywriting plane had created the text. Set to time-lapsed clouds, the words of the message fade away over several minutes before slowly being re-written in a continuous pre-programmed loop of reassurance.’

 

____________
Ronnie Van Hout Various, 2016-2017
‘It’s performance, so I was also interested in the stage. I was into the punk rock music scene when I was younger, which worked with the idea of taking away the stage. A lot of punk gigs were just on the floor, with the band on the same level as the audience, in a non-hierarchical situation. I’m interested in that in relationship to the performer’s position. In stand-up there’s an intimacy that’s created through the performance, which is different to theatre. You have to laugh. It’s not funny and it’s not a joke until someone laughs at it. My high school yearbook quote was: “The difference between people and animals is stand-up comedians.”’


YOU!, 2016



I Know Everything, 2017

 

____________
Paul Thek You Cannot Resist My Wave, 1979
Ballpoint on paper, 11 1/2 x 9 1/4 x 5/8”

 

____________
Cécile Babiole Copies conformes, 2017
une oeuvre réalisée grâce à une imprimante 3D


 

____________
Catherine Élise Müller Martian Language, 1897
‘Catherine Élise Müller (1861-1929) was a Swiss woman based in Geneva who, as a spiritualist medium, became known as “Hélène Smith.” In 1891, she attended her first séance, experienced hallucinations, and discovered her paranormal ability. Between 1895 and 1900, Théodore Flournoy, a psychology professor at the University of Geneva, observed Smith’s automatic writing, trances, and claims about channeling the spirit of Marie Antoinette and being psychically transported to Mars. Smith “wrote” in hitherto unknown languages, including, she said, those of Mars and Uranus.’

 

____________
Tim Rollins and K.O.S. Darkwater (after W.E.B. DuBois), 2013
‘Rollins and K.O.S. begin with important literary and musical classics as the inspiration for their artwork, which is typically produced directly on the pages of books, cut out and laid in a grid on canvas. This is their signature style, which was developed early on in their collaboration. To create Darkwater (after W.E.B. Du Bois), Rollins introduced Dubois’ seminal text to the IS 218 students during a weeklong workshop. By dipping 72 pages from a first edition print of the book into black and gold watercolor, the students responded to issues discussed in ‘Darkwater’ – relating to race, class and gender – through the process of art making.’

 

____________
Adam Pendleton Various, 2016-2019
‘Adam Pendleton is a conceptual artist known for his multi-disciplinary practice, which moves fluidly between painting, publishing, photographic collage, video and performance. The artist’s work centers on an engagement with language, in both the figurative and literal senses, and the re-contextualization of history through appropriated imagery to establish alternative interpretations of the present and, as the artist has explained, “a future dynamic where new historical narratives and meanings can exist.”’

 

_____________
Matt Donovan & Hallie Siegel Landscape, 2012
Mixed media installation 16′ x 10′ x 10′

 

______________
CB Hoyo Buy Art Not Drugs, 2018
‘CB Hoyo is a self-taught Cuban artist, who lives and works in Europe. He is also very active on social media, starting conversations with his followers about art, about the issues which he addresses, about very awkward and personal subjects.’

 

______________
Robert Lyn Nelson Beatles Tribute, 2020
‘Years of painting and creating works has helped Robert to be able to create a vision in his mind and transfer it to canvas without the use of studies in most of his works. Robert’s Beatles Tribute Series, which he started in 2008, allows him to explore and discover different avenues of surrealism. Interpreting the songs and lyrics of the music of The Beatles like “Hey Jude” to create visual art has taken him on a surrealistic journey….expanding his artistic range, which is how you do an art study.’

 

______________
Nathan Carter TRAVELING LANGUAGE MACHINE WITH #3 FREQUENCY DISRUPTOR AND DISINFORMATION NUMBERS STATION, 2007
‘Carter matter-of-factly declares, “This is a radar reflector,” [Gestures wildly] and this [Gestures wildly] is a traveling radio station.” He’s a guy who imagines the letters of a text message floating in a jumble up to bounce off a satellite, then back down to fill the recipient’s phone.’

 

______________
Lawrence Weiner As far as the eye can see, 1998-2015
‘The artist may construct the piece. The piece may be fabricated. The piece need not be built. Each being equal and consistent with the intent of the artist the decision as to condition rests with the receiver upon the occasion of receivership.’ – Lawrence Weiner

 

______________
Gabriel Kuri Various, 2003-2006
‘Gabriel Kuri is renowned for sculptures and collages made from the remains of everyday purchases and found objects. Kuri reconfigures meaning from tickets and receipts, retail supplies and slabs of marble, stones and other incongruous materials of related to consumption. Both his objects and images are often created from the residue of monetary exchanges and the consumed goods that the artist collects on a daily basis.’


 

______________
Glenn Ligon Various, 1992-1995
‘Glenn Ligon’s early love of literature evolved into a fascination with the political and social uses of language, which informs much of his work. Ligon’s paintings and prints contemplate issues about the formation and perception of identity and race. Ligon is perhaps best known for paintings that feature carefully selected phrases or sentences taken from literary sources such as Gertrude Stein, James Baldwin, Ralph Ellison, Mary Shelley, and Jean Genet. Ligon’s manipulations of the text call into question the difference between seeing and reading, and the reliability of the ways in which people see and read each other.’

 

_____________
Claire Fontaine Various, 2008-2021
‘Claire Fontaine is not just a conspicuously feminine name for an artists’ collaboration. “She” cannot be mistaken for a woman, because she is already something else: a brand of French notebook, more ready-made than fictional character. Since 2004, Fontaine has, with her Paris-based “assistants,” Fulvia Carnevale and James Thornhill, produced textual and object-based inquiries into the legacies of the left, most explicitly May ’68 and Italian movements of the 1970s, in an almost forensic search for the secret freedoms that might be cultivated under capitalism, a search whose tactics they refer to as “human strike”—radical secession from much that comprises contemporary subjecthood (work, consumption, and so-called individuality).’


Please come back, 2008


Evil/Good, 2017


Sputiamo su Hegel: La donna clitoridea e la donna vaginale brickbat (2015)



Dior Autumn-Winter 2020-2021 Show

 

_____________
Louis Wain I Am Happy Because Everyone Loves Me, 1928
chalk and coloured ink on paper

 

_____________
Jesse Howard Various, 1958 – 1966
‘He was named one of the ten most important folk artists in America before his death, his works hang in the Smithsonian and around the world, and Pulitzer Prize-winning author Richard Rhodes described him as the “Grandma Moses of print culture;” yet, few in his hometown of Fulton would remember Jesse Howard as anything but an eccentric crank. As the years have passed, Howard is more renowned for his art outside of Fulton than within it, which might just be appropriate because it was Howard’s uneasy relationship with this community that inspired his best work.’

 

_____________
Emily Dickinson One sister have I in the House, 1859
‘What was Emily thinking when she “wrote” this? Was it the start of a poem? What was she feeling?’

 

_____________
Ken Lum Time. And Again., 2021
‘Ken Lum is known for text-based photographs that challenge notions of cultural identity and multiculturalism by exploring interactions of language, kitsch, image, and narrative. All of the ideas explored by Lum are defining characteristics for shareable memes online.’

 

_____________
Joseph Kosuth TITLED (ART AS IDEA AS IDEA), 1967
photographs mounted on sintra PVC

 

_____________
Marcel Broodthaers La Pluie, 1969
La Pluie (The Rain) was filmed in the garden of the rue de la Pépinière during the Musée d’Art Moderne, Département des Aigles, Section XIXe siècle period. The film shows Marcel Broodthaers trying to write while the rain constantly washes away the ink. In the final scene, during which the artist gives up and drops his pen, the inscription “Projet pour un texte” (Project for a text) appears.’

 

____________
Rana Hamadeh Can You Pull In an Actor With a Fishhook or Tie Down His Tongue With a Rope? 2015-2016
‘Rana Hamadeh’s “Can You Pull In An Actor With A Fishhook Or Tie Down His Tongue With A Rope?” is an eight-channel sound play that departs from a claim that regards justice as the extent to which one has access to the dramatic means of representation – the measure to which one can access theatre. The performance takes the Shi’ite ceremony of Ashura, alongside the political, military and legal actualisations of this ritual within the Lebanese and Syrian contexts, as a field for commentary and research. Ashura is a theatrical religious ceremony that re-stages the battle of Karbala during which Imam Al Hussein (626–80 AD), the grandson of Prophet Mohammad and an allegorical reference to the figure of the oppressed, was killed. Through a series of rites and orations over the course of ten days each year, Ashura mourners recount the battle’s events, weep and inflict wounds onto their bodies. Fluctuating between the theatrical and the actual witnessing of the crime, Ashura mourners constitute themselves as testimonial subjects while embodying the roles of the oppressor and the oppressed at once. Treating Ashura as a dramaturgical framework that underlies the entire politics of oppression in Lebanon and Syria, Hamadeh’s performance decodes, reorders and re-choreographs the ceremony’s theatrical components, proposing with that a possible language through which the history of the region’s violence can be re-read. The work considers whether it is possible to script Justice – to rehearse, narrate, weep, chant, choreograph, or even spectate justice.’

 

____________
Lee Ming-Wei 100 Days with Lily, 1995
100 Days with Lily was created at a time when I was grieving the death of my maternal grandmother. I chose to live with it 24/7 for the following 100 days, as a form of ritual grieving for her. From the day I planted the lily bulb, through its germination, sprouting, blossoming, fading and death, I experienced at close hand a full cycle of its life and, by extension, my grandmother’s and my own. I randomly chose a moment in each day to document what I was doing with the lily present.

‘In the final presentation, text was overlaid onto five of the photographs to create images showing both various stages of lily’s life and my activities at various moments: day 1, 10:23, planting lily; day 2, 06:34, sleeping with lily; day 3, 12:05, eating with lily; day 4, 09:14, walking with lily; day 5, 07:12, meditating with lily. Lily died on day 79, at which point I postponed the exhumation and carried the now dormant lily bulb in my hands for the remaining 21 days as I ate, walked, slept, gardened, bicycled, shopped, cooked, read, and contemplated, until I had lived with the lily for the full 100 days.’

 

_____________
Konrad Smolenski The End of Radio, 2012
‘The End of Radio is an installation of two hundred microphones, which emit two hundred field recordings of people talking on the street.’

 

_____________
Rene Ricard Various, 1989-1997
‘Known as “poem paintings”, Ricard merged imagery and text onto antique prints or old photographs that he would find in second-hand stores – layering his words over the original surface or covering it entirely.’

 

_____________
Dennis Oppenheim Theme for a Major Hit, 1974
Aluminum, felt, plastic, wood, electric motor, spotlight, and other materials

 

_____________
Mel Bochner Untitled, 2015
‘For more than 45 years Mel Bochner has explored the intersections of linguistic and visual representation. As one of the pioneers of conceptual art during the ‘60s, Bochner developed a body of work that causes us to read and see simultaneously, to “think” as we look. Mel Bochner has taken an unusual turn toward painterly expressiveness during the past two decades.’

 

_____________
Art & Language Now They Are I, 2015
144 parts, ink and paint on paper

 

______________
Shilpa Gupta Words come from Ears, 2018
Motion flapboard

 

______________
Barbara Brandel Sampler (Jacket), 1995
dyed cotton, silk, and wool

 

______________
Frances Stark Osservate, leggete con me, 2012
3-channel digital video for projection, black and white with sound

 

______________
Matt Siber Various, 2003-2006
‘Matt Siber’s work is characterized by the intervention on urban photographs where the focus is on traffic signs, advertising posters on the roads, or the most influential capitalist consumerism brands. Using Photoshop, he eliminates the support structures of these objects so that the logos are left floating. Using this action, the artist removes all visual distractions to only pay attention to the text or the logo.’

 

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** Tomk, With a capital ‘T’ no less! Any part that this place might have played is a source of immense pride, maestro. I hope your head rests so lightly on your neck it feels like a whiffle ball today. ** Dominik, Hi!!! Tough choice, no question there. Yes, tickets to-and-fro LA are secured. Leave here on the 17th, return here on November 11th. And those will be the blog vacation dates too, of course. Thank you, love. That soundtrack switch would absolutely and entirely recreate my relationship to my upstairs’ temporary neighbors. I would even bake them a cake or something. Love successfully bribing me with Mexican food to return his affections, G. ** Misanthrope, You must be right, but an LLC was no tripping of the light fantastic. Yeah, I don’t care about Harry Styles. *ducks* You must really like him because most people I know say his acting abilities make Madonna seem like Isabelle Huppert. *ducks* Oh, yeah, man, you and me, we just get studlier by the minute. I’m always really surprised that the US still celebrates Columbus Day. Happy to hear you’re putting writing at the fore, natch. Ah, but your straight out of the gate fart reference might make Amphetamine Sulphate and Infinity Land Press drool. ** David Ehrenstein, That I did not know. How curious. Thank you! ** Tea, Well, while they were briefly or sort of briefly imprisoned in the meat locker they would have heard the sound of a tape recording of me and my friends screaming into an old reel-to reel tape recorder’s microphone that had been slowed down to make it sound not like just a bunch of kids screaming intone microphone if that counts as music? Yay, you’re a ‘Grounded’ guy too! What were the odds? I love so many of theirs. ‘Starlings in the Slipstream’ pops into my head. I did read, I think, that the new Swans is the last Swans, but, you know, Michael did that before and it didn’t stick. No new fetish stuff from me either, I don’t think. Alas. My day was kind of inflated in a funny way. I hope your day’s only limits are scat, blood, and children. ** Jamie, Hey, pal. I need to do that horror update too, but I haven’t yet. I’m still just trawling for haunted houses and gory props and stuff. I too am most curious how Bret responds to my question. He likes me so maybe he’ll cut my question some slack. I had a friend in high school who died because he was huffing aerosol from a paint can and didn’t do it right and filled his lungs with paint, so the thought that people do that always gives me chills. It’s aways best to push yourself beyond your current limits and then pare back if need be. I do that all the time. You’ll get your ending. It’s fated. I got my tickets to go to LA, and I bought tickets to see Destroyer play on Friday night, so those made yesterday something. And other stuff of no excitement that didn’t undercut that something. So, did ‘Celtic’ win, and is ‘Celtic’ related to the Boston Celtics? Sports and I are barely familiar with each other. I have not seen ‘The Wolf House’, no, but it will be my first Halloween movie, if I can help it. Hello-there-ladies-and-gentlemen-hello-there-ladies-and-gents-are-you-ready-to-rock love, me. ** _Black_Acrylic, You nailed precisely what he is admirable for and impeccably, sir. Oh, no, so sorry you’ll miss that event. Grr. ** Steve Erickson, I’m not sure. I’m not even sure when it’s being conducted. Presumably timed with ‘The Shards’. Everyone, Steve’s ‘October music roundup for Gay City News, featuring Shygirl, Ezra Furman and the Recitals, came out today.’ Zero interest in seeing “Blonde’. Nothing about it lures me in at all. I’ve heard that about ‘My Policeman’ and about Mr. Styles’ performance, and you had better hope Misa didn’t read your comment about Mr. Styles’ acting chops because he might just train into NYC and whomp you upside your head. ** Robert, Hi. Oh, Not infrequently do I not read an entire novel, but not because I dislike it necessarily, but because I pretty much read for style and structure and stuff, and sometimes it only takes a chapter or whatever to figure what the writer is doing, and then I lose interest because I don’t really believe in fiction enough to care about the characters and story. When I hate a novel, it usually only takes me about ten sentences before I close the cover. But I totally get you. I don’t know, I think your highly selective manner of reading is the sign of someone who gives a huge shit about what you’re reading which quite possibly makes you a great reader, in fact. You and your standards have my complete admiration. ** Paul Curran, Hi, P! Excellent! And I am not even surprised, dude! Interlocking devil horns! I pray for some form of Halloween within easy distance of your hideout. But in the meantime, yes, J-novel advancing, please, pretty please. ** Right. I hope you liked my recent ‘Words’ post because today you get its sequel. See you tomorrow.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 DC's

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑