The blog of author Dennis Cooper

Month: November 2020 (Page 8 of 12)

Harry Dean Stanton Day

 

‘A character actor who briefly became a star in 1984, appearing in leading roles in Paris, Texas and Repo Man, Harry Dean Stanton (born in Kentucky in 1926) was also part of what made the seventies such a great decade for film, a time when character actors had the heft of leading parts but happened to play on the margins of a movie rather than at its centre. In Sophie Huber’s Harry Dean Stanton: Partly Fiction, writer and actor Sam Shepard talks of the actor’s reservations about playing the main role in Paris, Texas. Yet Shepard couldn’t see any reason why Stanton couldn’t master the role: it is just a character actor getting a bigger part. Shepard has a point but maybe for many actors this wouldn’t have been so, since film often practices a variation on what the novelist EM Forster calls round and flat characters. Round characters have subtlety, nuance and depth, but ‘flat characters were called “humours” in the seventeenth century, and are sometimes called types, and sometimes caricatures. In their purest form, they are constructed round a single idea or quality; when there is more than one factor in them, we get the beginning of the curve towards the round.’

‘Stanton was in this sense always a round character actor, and through the seventies appeared in Two-Lane Blacktop, Pat Garrett & Billy the Kid, Cockfighter, The Missouri Breaks, 92 in the Shade, Renaldo and Clara, Straight Time and Alien. He was someone that could play a small role without it feeling no more than a plot function, and Huber’s documentary shows a scene from The Missouri Breaks illustrating this well. As his horse rustler talks to Jack Nicholson about his past, director Arthur Penn films Stanton’s brief revelation in a single take. Talking about his father’s cruelty and his own revenge, Stanton delivers his lines with the force of a leading man’s back story, though it remains merely the anecdote of a supporting player.

‘Stanton can be flippant about his interest in cinema, talking about the theatre being too damn demanding and money and girls more easily acquired through film, but his personal assistant insists that Stanton works so hard on the material he can remember other characters’ lines and not just his own. When David Lynch says in the film that many actors can memorize their lines, but what they can’t do is take care of their silences, Stanton seems someone who manages to memorize his and the other characters’ and take care of the silences too. This is beautifully illustrated in a clip from Lynch’s The Straight Story. As Stanton looks out at the motorised lawnmower his estranged brother has driven 240 miles in to visit him, so the emotion becomes too much. It might be Richard Farnsworth who has the leading role, but in this moment it is Stanton who has what we might call the ‘leading feeling’.

‘Stanton understands the years of silence that can yawn between people, and knows that dialogue is sometimes just a bridge to cross it. Much of the time in Huber’s doc, Stanton, a frail, melancholic figure, is happier singing a song about pain rather than expressing his own too directly, as if words ought to be used only when we can put meaningful feelings into them. As Wim Wenders notes in the film, Stanton has always been a vulnerable, sensitive man; it’s a point also made by an acquaintance of Stanton’s who has known him since the late 60s. Stanton doesn’t talk much but what he says really matters, the friend says, and this is no doubt partly what makes Stanton such a marvellous supporting player. He might have over his many years in film been given relatively few lines, but he knows that the feeling often lies elsewhere anyway.’ — film.list.co.uk

 

___
Stills

























































 

____
Extras


David Lynch on Harry Dean Stanton


Harry Dean Stanton /Hunter S. Thompson


Charles Bukowski’s “Torched Out” read by Harry Dean Stanton


Pop Will Eat Itself ‘Harry Dean Stanton’


During his 80th birthday party, Harry Dean Stanton covers the Jim Reeves’ song “He’ll Have To Go”


Bob Dylan and HDS sing ‘Hava Nagila’

 

_____
Further

Harry Dean Stanton Website
THE HARRY DEAN STANTON DAILY
Harry Dean Stanton @ IMDb
‘Wild at Heart: Harry Dean Stanton’
Harry Dean Stanton Fest
‘Harry Dean Stanton: What I’ve Learned’
‘7 Things You Didn’t Know About Harry Dean Stanton’
‘Harry Dean Stanton: Crossing Mulholland’
Crispin Glover/Harry Dean Stanton
‘Harry Dean Stanton’s Long Ride in the Whirlwind’
‘Solitary Man: HARRY DEAN STANTON’
Harry Dean Stanton @ The Criterion Collection

‘What’s with the bump on Harry Dean Stanton’s forehead?’
‘SNL Transcripts: Harry Dean Stanton: 01/18/86’

 

_______
Interview

 

Tell me everything a director should know about actors.
Harry Dean Stanton: Well number one, you don’t have to be an authority figure. If you hear a director say “I’m the director and you’ll do what I say!”…If you ever feel yourself wanting to say that, you’re in deep shit. (laughs) I worked with George Lucas too, and you wouldn’t even know he was there, hardly. I did a video for him with Linda Ronstadt, Dolly Parton and Emmylou Harris. Still plays sometimes. If you know your material, you’ve got to get good actors. Casting is 75% of it, or more. If you’ve got a good script and good actors, you’re in good shape.

What was it like working with Sam Peckinpah on Pat Garrett?
HDS: Well, the thing I remember most about that shoot is becoming friends with Bob Dylan. We hung out quite a bit during the shoot. Drove together all the way from Guadalajara, Mexico to Kansas City together. We jammed together quite a bit. He liked my Mexican songs. I can sing in Spanish. But Peckinpah, he was a volatile, very difficult guy. He never got on my case, but he was very hard on women. He was a drinker, you know. A real character. My theory was, he had a TV series once about an anti-hero called The Westerner, or something. The guy had a dog, and didn’t always win the gunfights. It got canceled…Sam was really trying to do good work, but my theory is he just got pissed off at the whole industry and started making violent films. I never really liked that whole genre, the western. Most were just morality plays with a good guy and bad guy…not really my bag.

What is your favorite genre?
HDS: No genre, really. Anything that’s original.

You seem to be drawn toward character-driven material and to stay away from blockbuster films with lots of pyrotechnics, explosions, and so on.
HDS: Yeah, well that stuff’s all too obvious. It’s like a circus. Circus maxiumus. It’s reminiscent of the Forum in Rome, with the lions and the Christians. (laughs)

Tell me about doing Godfather II.
HDS: Well working with (Francis) Coppola is always fun. I did three films with him. One was a television film. I played Rip Van Winkle (laughs). I love Francis. He’s a wonderful director. Respects actors. He did something on One From the Heart that was, especially for a “big time” director was really wonderful. There was a scene with Teri Garr and Fred Forrest and he came up to me and said “Harry Dean, you direct this scene.” No director has done that before, or since with me. And I did, I helped him direct it. Of course he had the final word on it, but for a director to do something like that is pretty special.

You did Farewell My Lovely with Robert Mitchum, who just died. What was he like?
HDS: Oh, he was a legendary character. Great story teller. He was good to be around. Always stoned (laughs).

You hung out with some legendary people yourself during the 60’s: Nicholson, Dennis Hopper, Peter Fonda. It must’ve been a great time.
HDS: The 60’s were great. They ought to re-run ’em. A lot people didn’t get it.

What didn’t they get?
HDS: The whole revolutionary concept is the consciousness revolution against the whole system. The state, government, religion, everything. A lot of eastern religion started having an effect on the culture, too, at that point. Alan Watts, Kerouac, Ginsberg, Leary of course, who leaned a little too heavily on LSD saving the world, but I understood exactly what he was doing. On LSD the ego just goes out the window. It’s all tied in to eastern philosophy and Bhuddism, although they certainly wouldn’t recommend LSD (laughs) because that’s not the answer to it.

It sounds like you really relate to eastern philosophy and spirituality more than western.
HDS: Oh yeah, totally. I can’t relate to the Judaic-Christian concept at all. It’s a fascistic concept. All fear-based. All about there being a boss. Someone in charge. A creator. As far as we know, infinity is a reality. There’s no beginning to this and no end. So (the Judaic-Christians) made it, ‘Okay, after you die you’re gonna live forever, but not before.’ But with a positive eternity, there’s no ending and you also have to realize there’s no beginning, which blows the creationist theory totally out the window.

When you have to go to a dark place with a character, like in Paris, Texas, does that take a toll physically?
HDS: No, not with that kind of character. There was something haunting about him, very believable. Dark characters to me are serial killers, like Dennis Hopper’s role in Blue Velvet. As a matter of fact, David Lynch wanted to meet with me to play that role originally and I turned the meeting down because I think I was afraid of it. That was a big mistake, though. I wish I’d done it and just seized the bull by the horns. The older I got, the more I didn’t want to go (to those dark places) which is a mistake for an actor. And this isn’t to say that in the end I would’ve gotten the role…this is tricky, but Dennis knows all this. There were three roles I turned down that he wound up doing: Blue Velvet, River’s Edge and Hoosiers. And Dennis was nominated for an Oscar for Hoosiers. For River’s Edge I told ’em to call Dennis (laughs). And I sincerely don’t want to sound self-serving or to rain on Dennis’ parade, although I probably have (laughs). Dennis and I have laughed about it before.

 

_______________________
23 of Harry Dean Stanton’s 206 films

___________________
Monte Hellman Ride in the Whirlwind (1966)
‘Working from a thoughtful script by Jack Nicholson, Monte Hellman fashioned this moody and tense western about a trio of cowhands who are mistaken for robbers and must outrun and hide from a posse of bloodthirsty vigilantes in the wilds of Utah. A grim yet gripping tale of chance and blind frontier justice, Ride in the Whirlwind is brought to life by a compelling cast, including Nicholson, Cameron Mitchell, Millie Perkins, and Harry Dean Stanton.’ — The Criterion Collection


Excerpt

the entirety

 

__________________
Stuart Rosenberg Cool Hand Luke (1967)
‘”If I fall, dear lord, who cares?” Stanton croons as he strums the guitar in Cool Hand Luke, the 1967 film where he plays the character of Tramp. His performance of the traditional “Just a Closer Walk With Thee” is one of several songs he can be heard singing in the movie, the others including “Midnight Special” and “Ain’t No Grave Can Keep My Body Down,” though they were not part of the soundtrack album.’ — billboard


Excerpt


Excerpt

 

____________________
Maury Dexter The Mini-Skirt Mob (1968)
‘Driven by jealousy, the jilted leader of a female motorcycle gang instigates a sadistic reign of terror against her ex-lover and his new bride.’ — The Vintagent


Trailer

 

______________________
Monte Hellman Two Lane Blacktop (1971)
‘Two-Lane Blacktop is a 1971 road movie directed by Monte Hellman, starring singer-songwriter James Taylor, the Beach Boys drummer Dennis Wilson, Warren Oates, Laurie Bird, and Harry Dean Stanton. Esquire magazine declared the film its movie of the year for 1971, and even published the entire screenplay in its April 1971 issue, but the film was not a commercial success. The film has since become a cult classic. Two-Lane Blacktop is notable as a time capsule film of U.S. Route 66 during the pre-Interstate Highway era, and for its stark footage and minimal dialogue. As such, it has become popular with fans of Route 66. Two-Lane Blacktop has been compared to similar road movies with an existentialist message from the era, such as Vanishing Point, Easy Rider, and Electra Glide in Blue.’ — collaged


Trailer

 

________________
John Milius Dillinger (1973)
‘I wanted to make a movie about Dillinger because of all the outlaws, he was the most marvelous. I look at it today and I find it very crude, but I do find it immensely ambitious. We didn’t have a lot of money, or time, and we didn’t have such things – we only had so many feet of track, stuff like that. So I couldn’t do moving shots if they involved more than, what, six yards of track. We never had any kind of crane or anything. That’s the way movies were made then.’ — John Milius, 2003


Excerpt

 

__________________
Monte Hellman Cockfighter (1974)
‘Director Monte Hellman’s Cockfighter is adapted from the novel by Charles Willeford, with the author also adapting the screenplay. It has the feel of the real thing, as it was shot on authentic Southern locations and explores with eyes wide open the lure of the subculture of the notorious but popular illegal sports business. Néstor Almendros does a beautiful job in filming, and the realistic flavor is further induced by the cockfighters being the real participants in the sport. Underneath that study the film bristles with a compelling psychological tale about repression, where competitiveness becomes a substitute for sex. This is a blood and guts art film with unforgettable intensity and stark scenes that few films have managed to capture with such fervor. It’s an obscure film highly thought of as a cult favorite, but largely neglected by the public.’ — Dennis Schwartz, Ozus


The entire movie

 

___________________
Arthur Penn The Missouri Breaks (1976)
The Missouri Breaks (1976) is not your usual Western. In fact, it’s not your usual anything. The words most commonly used in reviews at the time of its release were “bizarre” and “odd” and it must have equally confused audiences expecting something quite different from the inspired teaming of Marlon Brando and Jack Nicholson. But seen today, the film’s peculiar mixture of Western cliches, black comedy, quirky romance and revenge drama makes for a decidedly offbeat entertainment. While most critics were particularly unkind to the film when it opened, British writer Tom Milne was one of the few to assess the film’s true quality: “It’s one of the few truly major Westerns of the ’70s, with a very clear vision of the historical role played by fear and violence in the taming of the wilderness.”‘ — TCM


Excerpt

 

____________________
John Huston Wise Blood (1979)
‘A prolific writer of short stories and essays, and a traveling lecturer on both the art of writing and her own Catholic faith, Flannery O’Connor published only one more novel before her death in 1964, at the age of 39. Short listed even in life as a practitioner of “Southern Gothic,” O’Connor preferred her own label of “Christian realism.” In an essay published posthumously in 1969, the author opined that “anything that comes out of the South is going to be called grotesque, unless it is grotesque, in which case it is going to be called realistic.” When fledgling screenwriters Benedict and Michael Fitzgerald were stonewalled while peddling their own scripts in Hollywood in the late 1970s, they turned to an almost forgotten family asset – their old babysitter Flannery O’Connor. Following O’Connor’s death in 1964, their father Robert had been named her literary executor. The principal photography for Wise Blood began in January 1979, in and around Macon, Georgia, with John Huston directing and various members of both the Huston and Fitzgerald families filling out the 25-person crew. Wise Blood also marked a dynamic pre-rediscovery performance by Harry Dean Stanton, whose smaller role in Ridley Scott’s Alien (1979) got him more attention that same year.’ — collaged


Excerpt

 

____________________
Ridley Scott Alien (1979)
‘Harry Dean Stanton as Brett, the Engineering Technician. Stanton’s first words to Ridley Scott during his audition were “I don’t like sci fi or monster movies.” Scott was amused and convinced Stanton to take the role after reassuring him that Alien would actually be a thriller more akin to Ten Little Indians. Film critic Roger Ebert notes that the actors in Alien were older than was typical in thriller films at the time, which helped make the characters more convincing: None of them were particularly young. Tom Skerritt, the captain, was 46, Hurt was 39 but looked older, Holm was 48, Harry Dean Stanton was 53, Yaphet Kotto was 42, and only Veronica Cartwright at 29 and Weaver at 30 were in the age range of the usual thriller cast. Many recent action pictures have improbably young actors cast as key roles or sidekicks, but by skewing older, Alien achieves a certain texture without even making a point of it: These are not adventurers but workers, hired by a company to return 20 million tons of ore to Earth.’ — collaged


Extended scene

 

___________________
Bertrand Tavernier La Mort en direct (1980)
‘Director Bertrand Tavernier provides an unexpected feminist slant to the otherwise standard sci-fi trappings of Death Watch. Harvey Keitel plays a man of the future who has had a camera implanted in his brain. The mechanism, which is endowed with special X-ray properties, is activated by the user’s eyes. Keitel is assigned by ruthless TV producer Harry Dean Stanton to secretly probe the subconscious of a dying woman, played by Romy Schneider. Stanton is only interested in the grim spectacle of what goes on inside the brain of someone who knows she’s doomed. Keitel, on the other hand, becomes increasingly compassionate–and disgusted by the tawdriness of his assignment–as he stares into Schneider’s tortured psyche.’ — Hal Erickson, Rovi


Bertrand Tavernier à propos de “La mort en direct”

 

___________________
John Carpenter Escape from New York (1981)
Escape From New York is a very dark and moody film. There isn’t much optimism for the world and the main protagonist is a cold and uncaring anti-hero. This is established early on when Snake simply ignores a woman being assaulted by two NY inmates. Snake’s philosophy can be summed up simply: if it doesn’t effect him personally, he doesn’t give a shit. Kurt Russell is immense as the tough badass, it’s a role I can’t imagine anyone else playing, except maybe one of the inspirations for the character, Clint Eastwood. Snake Plissken is possibly the quintessential anti-hero. He’s tough, he has no respect for authority and he will shoot first and ask questions later. The film is stacked with strong performances, whether it’s Lee van Cleef as the former war hero turned police commissioner Bob Hauk, Harry Dean Stanton as the smug and arrogant “Brain”, Ernest Borgnine as the happy go lucky “Cabbie” or Isaac Hayes as the Duke of New York (he’s A#1). Female’s are thin on the ground but Adrienne Barbeau is smoking hot and deadly as Maggie, she is no shrinking violet or damsel in distress.’ — DoctorStrangeSF


Trailer

 

__________________
Wim Wenders Paris, Texas (1984)
‘The plot of Paris, Texas is disarmingly simple, focusing on the dramatic after-effects of a marriage’s breakdown on young Hunter (played by Hunter Carson, son of writer L. M. Kit Carson and actress Karen Black); his father, Travis (a name that still had sinister resonance eight years after Scorsese’s Taxi Driver, and played with shell-shocked intensity by Harry Dean Stanton); and his mother, Jane, a plain name almost willfully ill suited to the fragile, feral character embodied in the film by Nastassja Kinski. Travis is found wandering in the desert by his brother, Walt (Dean Stockwell), is reunited with Hunter, sets off with Hunter to find Jane, finds her, and disappears again. That’s about it. What turns this fairly ordinary-sounding family drama into something on the edge of epic is its use of landscape and setting—the desert Southwest, California’s San Fernando Valley (also the setting for Wenders’s 1997 The End of Violence), and the concrete canyons of Houston—reinforced by the stunning cinematography of regular early collaborator Robby Müller and a plangent slide-guitar score by Ry Cooder.’ — Nick Roddick, The Criterion Collection


Trailer


Excerpt


Excerpt

 

___________________
Alex Cox Repo Man (1984)
‘A quintessential cult film of the 1980s, Alex Cox’s singular sci-fi comedy stars the always captivating Harry Dean Stanton as a weathered repo man in a desolate Los Angeles, and Emilio Estevez as the nihilistic middle-class punk he takes under his wing. The job becomes more than either of them bargained for when they get involved in repossessing a mysterious—and otherworldly—Chevy Malibu with a hefty reward attached to it. Featuring the ultimate early eighties L.A. punk soundtrack, this grungily hilarious odyssey is also a politically trenchant take on President Reagan’s domestic and foreign policies. Arguably the defining cult film of the Reagan era, the feature debut of Alex Cox (Sid & Nancy, Walker, Straight to Hell) is a genre-busting mash-up of atomic-age science fiction, post-punk anarchism, and conspiracy paranoia, all shot through with heavy doses of deadpan humour and offbeat philosophy.’ — DVD Beaver


Excerpt


Excerpt

 

____________________
Robert Altman Fool for Love (1985)
‘I’ll come right out and say that the general consensus of Fool For Love is that it’s bad. Not terrible, just bad. When a film revolves around people exchanging dialogue for the entire film… they will tend to overact. In Fool For Love, there are two people who overact. Kim Basinger yells and screams the entire film. I cannot stand to see this in films, because the truth is nobody express themselves so audaciously. Sam Shepard has the same problem, in fact, he may even have a bigger problem with overacting in Fool For Love. This was fairly shocking since Sam Shepard and Kim Basinger are both great actors. There are also two good performances in Fool For Love. The first belongs to Harry Dean Stanton, who is quite good at the beginning slips a little in the end of the film when he joins Kim Basinger and Sam Shepard on the island of people who overact. Harry Dean Stanton’s character is an alcoholic old man, so perhaps the alcohol in his bloodstream could be to blame for his overacting at the end of the film.’ — Every Robert Altman Movie


Excerpt

 

____________________
John Hughes Pretty in Pink (1986)
‘John Hughes crafts an exemplary ’80s Brat Pack romance out of the standard Cinderella story in Pretty in Pink. Andie Walsh (Molly Ringwald) is a teenager who lives in the dingy part of town with her terminally underemployed dad (Harry Dean Stanton). She works at a record store with eccentric Ionia (Annie Potts) and is considered a misfit at her uppity high school, but somehow she rises above them all. Her oddball best friend, Duckie (Jon Cryer), is hopelessly in love with her, so he causes trouble for her romantic pursuits. When local rich kid Blaine (Andrew McCarthy) develops a fascination with her, they go out on a date together. Visiting the home bases of each social clique, they are basically ridiculed for their audacity to date one another. When Blaine eventually asks the delighted Andie to the prom, he is threatened by his rich friend Steff (James Spader). The romance versus high school social politics finally culminates at the big night of the prom.’  — Andrea LeVasseur, Rovi


Excerpt

 

___________________
David Lynch Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me (1992)
‘Easily among the most confounding broadcast-to-big screen translations ever produced, Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me completely capsized both in terms of critical and audience reception at the time of its 1992 release. To be fair, a good deal of the once large, built-in, tv fan base for the film had already fallen away during the final season of the show. Personally, I recall seeing the film on opening night at a small town, local theater with somewhere around seven other people in attendance; the film was dead upon arrival and limped out of town shortly thereafter. The reviews were brutal. The late Vincent Canby wrote that it was “not the worst film ever made; it just seems to be.” Peter Travers declared that “the impulse in the arts to build idols and smash them has found another victim in David Lynch.” My own reaction was a fairly muted response; I liked the parts I liked and remained curious about the other stuff, but it’s a film that’s difficult to be enthusiastic about on a first viewing. Time has been kind to FWWM and, unsurprisingly, given Lynch’s growing reputation as our nation’s chief surrealist, a cult audience has been erected around the film after its release on home video.’ — The Rain Falls Down on Portlandtown


Excerpt


Excerpt

 

___________________
David Lynch The Straight Story (1999)
‘What hasn’t been mentioned is this movie’s biggest flaw IMHO, the casting of Harry Dean Stanton as Alvin Straight’s brother. The entire film has been journeying towards the meeting with Lyle Straight, so it really takes you aback when the person to shamble out of the shack is not “Lyle Straight”, but actor Harry Dean Stanton. Stanton looks NOTHING like Richard Farnsworth — he’s dark and swarthy to Farnsworth’s ruddy and snow-haired. Lyle also doesn’t look anywhere near Alvin’s age (though surprisingly Stanton was born only 6 years after Farnsworth, in 1926). Lynch loves to re-use a stable of actors, and since no other major roles use his favorite actors, perhaps he felt he needed to make up for it by casting Stanton. I think it was a major mistake, however, since it wrenches the viewer out of the world of the movie at the worst time. Just a theory, but I bet if Jack Nance (may he rest in peace) had still been alive, Lynch would have cast him as Lyle Straight. Nance appeared in all of Lynch’s films until his death, and would have been able to pull off the role even better than Stanton, and had the advantage of looking MUCH more like Farnsworth. It’s truly a shame he wasn’t given that opportunity.’ — Dan Harkless, imdB


Excerpt

 

__________________
Gore Verbinski Rango (2011)
‘Harry Dean Stanton and Johnny Depp are no strangers to odd movies. Stanton was practically mute during his entire star turn in Paris, Texas, and Depp has managed, among many magic acts, to be lovable while joyfully eviscerating innocents on Fleet Street in Sweeney Todd. So it’s saying something that Stanton turned to Depp during the filming of their most recent film and … well, let Johnny tell it. “Harry says to me” — here Depp adopts the accented whisper of his fellow Kentuckian — ” ‘Hey man, this is a really weird gig, isn’t it?’ ” Weirder still is the fact that the gig wasn’t even a live-action movie but rather the animated feature Rango.— Marco R. della Cava


Trailer

 

____________________
Joss Whedon The Avengers (2012)
‘He may have made his name in some slightly more obscure/cult movies, but fans of cinema in general should be no stranger to Harry Dean Stanton. The 86 year old actor has appeared in such classics as Alien, Cool Hand Luke, Repo Man and Paris Texas to name but a few. And now he has a small, but very cool and funny cameo in Joss Whedon’s The Avengers. Stanton plays a security guard who converses with Bruce Banner (Mark Ruffalo) after his slightly greener, angrier alter ego crashes to Earth. It’s a great scene, and was originally quite a bit longer but had to be trimmed down. In an interview with Badass Digest Whedon explains why this little one on one was necessary for the character of Bruce Banner, and why Stanton was the perfect man for the job. “I sort of got him stuck in my head and I was like who is more accepting than Harry Dean Stanton? And, so I got to write this weird little scene – which when I wrote it was not little, it was about 12 pages long. I was like oh, this is great, Banner falls into a Coen Brothers movie! The fact that they even let me keep that concept and that we actually landed Harry Dean to play it was very exciting. But the idea was to put [Banner] in a slightly surreal situation with somebody who clearly had no problem with [The Hulk], just to make that little transition without milking it too much. And besides, to work with Harry Dean and to quiz him about Alien and The Missouri Breaks? What a privilege.”‘ — comicbookmovie.com


Deleted scene

 

____________________
Sophie Huber Harry Dean Stanton: Partly Fiction (2012)
‘Lensed in colour and b/w by Seamus McGarvey, the film explores Harry Dean Stanton’s enigmatic outlook on his life and his unexploited talents as a musician. “Putting the focus on the music rather than his person helped to engage him and capture a part of him that few people have seen. We wanted to create an atmosphere that is true to Harry, moving along with him, in his mind, at his pace, rather than to follow a linear or biographical order” (Sophie Huber, director). With excerpts from Alien, Paris Texas, The Straight Story, Missouri Breaks et al., and interviews with David Lynch, Wim Wenders, Sam Shepard, Kris Kristofferson and Debbie Harry.’ — SXSW


Trailer


Harry Dean Stanton and Sophie Huber discuss ‘Harry Dean Stanton: Partly Fiction’

 

______________
Martin McDonagh Seven Psychopaths (2012)
‘Besides Farrell, McDonagh had previously worked with the majority of the cast. In 2010 McDonagh directed Rockwell and Walken in his play “A Behanding in Spokane” and had met Harrelson, Cornish, and Kurylenko prior to “Seven Psychopaths.” However, McDonagh had one more top casting choice he wasn’t certain he could get—Harry Dean Stanton. “Like Walken and Waits, [Stanton’s] been a hero of mine since childhood. I told the casting person [Sarah Finn] that he was my dream choice for the role,” McDonagh said to the San Diego Reader. McDonagh recalled that Stanton was hesitant at first when he heard about the violence of the film. “When I told him he’d play a Quaker and the whole film is kind of a Buddhist take on Hollywood violence he said, ‘I’m into Eastern philosophies. Sure. I’ll do it,’ ” McDonagh said.’ — Backstage


Excerpt

 

_______________
John Carroll Lynch Lucky (2017)
‘Here is the heartrending almost-final movie performance from the then 90-year-old Harry Dean Stanton. (He actually had one more film in him after this before he died, playing a sheriff in the yet to be released Frank and Ava, about Frank Sinatra and Ava Gardner; and he was also in David Lynch’s new Twin Peaks on television.) Melancholy and faintly surreal, it’s very nearly a kind of filmic one-man-show.

‘He plays a wizened old guy, perhaps a spin on his character from Wim Wenders’s Paris, Texas – cantankerous and ornery, living all on his own, but doggedly doing his exercises every morning in his longjohns, hanging out grumpily in a local coffee shop during the day, and watching soaps at home, smoking a pack of American Spirits a day. His name is Lucky (the opening credits punningly announce: “Harry Dean Stanton is Lucky”), and it would have been interesting to see him play the character of that name in Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot.’ — The Guardian


Trailer


Excerpt

 

_____________
David Lynch Twin Peaks: The Return (2017)
‘Episode six of The Return featured one of the most moving – and shocking – sequences that David Lynch has ever created. On a quiet, sunny day in Twin Peaks, Stanton’s elderly trailer park owner Carl is sitting serenely on a park bench, enjoying the tranquillity.

‘A mother and her young son pass by, and Carl shares a smile with the pair as they play a simple game together. Then, moments later, the boy heads out into the road – only to be struck and instantly killed by the truck of detestable local thug Richard Horne, who promptly flees the scene.

‘The mother’s shrieks are haunting. But the power of the scene lies with Stanton’s Carl; the one person who steps forward from the crowd of onlookers to comfort her. As Stanton silently locks sorrowful eyes with the grieving woman, it’s arguably the most powerful moment of human connection we’ve seen in the entire series. And it’s all conveyed without words.

‘Carl’s entire role in the new Twin Peaks has largely been as a quiet, melancholy observer. A witness to terrible events. His very last scene in the season saw Stanton’s sad, world-weary eyes dwell on the boarded up windows of Steven and Becky’s trailer. Hinting at horrors inside.’ — inews.co.uk


Excerpt


Excerpt

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** David Ehrenstein, Jim Fouratt knew everybody or at least gave that impression. The kind of guy where I’d say I liked someone’s work, and he’d say, ‘I’ll introduce you’, and he usually did. One time I told him I’d had a big crush on Richard Lloyd of Television, and Jim literally tried to set us (unsuccessfully) on a date. Quite a character, and still is. ‘Lenny’s Tune’ is my favorite Tim Hardin song. His rendition is so much better than hers, IMO. ** Misanthrope, Hi. Well, yesterday the prime minister said there is a slight improvement and that maybe just maybe France will reopen a little for Xmas, but I (and everyone else) don’t believe it. ** Corey Heiferman, Hi, Corey! I’ve been wondering how and where you were. Man, I’m so very, very sorry about your dad. I hope his life is as long as it is pleasurable for all of you. Very good that you’re there, obviously. It’s weird where and how wisdom accrues, but yeah. It’s kind of a relentless thing. Big hopes on the job hunt back home. I was just watching a newscast thing from Tel Aviv, and I realised it’s the first time I’ve ever actually seen what the city looks like. It looks like … a big city. I don’t know what else I expected. Weird how one exoticizes the unknown. Thanks for the link to that album. I’ll absorb it. Very good to see you, sir! ** Steve Erickson, Actually, there’s a new music gig post coming on Monday. I haven’t really found my new music search hampered, but I search in unusual realms, I guess. Everywhere I usually look is still very active. The death of TinyMixTapes is an ongoing loss though. Have you seen the Julien Temple Pogues doc? I’m curious, no surprise. He seems like he could be a generally interesting interviewee. You guys in NYC seem to be inching in our direction, yeah, but I can’t imagine the govt. permission forms thing will ever be seriously considered there much less could take. ** Armando, Hi. No, I’m feeling about the same, which is better than feeling worse certainly. I have no ideas what’s up. It feels like a cold or something. It’s only ominous because of the context. Yeah, I went to a private boys-only school that was completely anti-creativity. No art classes or writing classes or even wood shop. My gang and I were the school’s arty guys. Most of them have disappeared into the world, and I don’t know what became of them. One of my best friends was a guitarist/singer named John Mayer. When the famous John Mayer appeared, I thought he might be my friend’s son, but he isn’t. Another friend (George Miles’ old brother) was a bass player and he eded up being a dentist. Another guitarist/songwriter friend wound up managing a sporting goods store. I have no memory of other old posts about Nico, and they’re aren’t in the archives, but there’s a bunch of the archives that I haven’t uploaded yet, so I guess it’s possible. Thanks about my poems. I’m not a huge DeLillo fan, but, yeah, that’s a nice passage. Maddening times indeed! Plans for today? Stay not sicker. Setting up a future Zoom meeting with a person/organisation who/that looks very likely to be the co-producer of Zac’s and my new film. Ideally a meeting that cements that, which will be a huge step if it happens. That should be it, today-wise. You? ** Right. The other day for whatever reason I thought about the late and lovable Harry Dean Stanton and decided to go check out what films he had appeared in over the long course of his career, and one thing lead to another resulting in a post. See you tomorrow.

If you don’t speak French, you’ve likely never read — or, if you only speak English, even heard of — Roger Laporte, so, for future reference … *

* (restored)
—-

 

Laporte, Roger (1925-2001). A philosopher by training, Laporte is primarily known as the author of a series of unusual works (including La Veille, 1963; Fugue, 1970; Moriendo, 1983) where attention focuses on the activity of writing itself, to the virtual exclusion of other subject-matter. Assembled in one volume (Une vie, 1986), the nine separate texts are experiments in a new genre, labelled ‘biographie’ (see Carnets, 1979; Lettre à personne, 1988), where the writer’s self is apprehended in its primordial relationship to language and utterance. Austere but rigorous and elevating, Laporte’s work often invokes kindred spirits such as Mallarmé, Artaud, and Blanchot, on whom he has written with penetration (Quinze variations sur un thème biographique, 1975). While a number of Laporte’s essays on contemporary philosophers have been published in periodicals and anthologies in the UK and the United States, only a very few fragments of his own vastly significant writing have been translated into English. Nonetheless, the scholar Ian Maclachlan’s brilliant and acclaimed book length study of Laporte’s work, Roger Laporte: The Orphic Text, was published by Oxford University Press in 2000. Laporte died in 2001.

 

 

‘Roger Laporte’s Fugue takes away
in advance all metalinguistic
resources and makes of this
quasi-operation an unheard
music outside of genre.’
— Jacques Derrida

 

 

a tribute to Roger Laporte by Derrida, Giraudon, Deguy, & others

 

‘A pure reading which does not call
for another writing is incomprehens-
ible to me. Reading Proust, Blanchot,
Kafka, Artaud gave me no desire to
write on these authors (not even,
I might add, like them), but to write.’
— Roger Laporte

 

_____________

 

A rare translated fragment: from ‘Fugue’ (1970)

‘Fugue is a long monologue in which a narrator proposes to write a novel that would expose his experience of writing in its immediacy, that is, as he sets his hand down to write on the blank page. The narrator states that his purpose “is to write a book that would be its own content, a book that would produce and register its own elaboration”. His project is dictated, he says, by his intention to “reveal the inner workings of the thought process”. The metafictional theme of writing is maintained throughout the novel. It is in fact its fundamental organizing principle.
—-”In the fugal structure and in the novel, a single theme is present as a unifying element. In both, it is a base element that is “searched out”. In the case of the fugue, it is the multiple entries of, and variations on, the theme that expose its musical potential. In the novel, the narrator proposes various models that he hopes will shed light on the question “What is writing?”. Thus the fugal theme or subject, as it is also called, and the novel’s theme can be projected onto each other as counterparts. Particular features — both are monothematic compositions whose themes have a unifying function and provide the potential for exploration and development — are recruited to participate in the construct of a blended space.’

from Frederique Arroyas’ ‘When is a Text like Music?’ (read the entirety)

 



 

____________

 

for our French speakers

Extrait du chapitre consacré à Marcel Proust

On peut en revanche essayer de comprendre pourquoi chez Proust les expériences de mémoire affective s’accompagnent toujours d’un tel sentiment de félicité que sa propre mort, véritable hantise, lui devient indifférente. – Une expérience majeure, constante, partagée par Swann et par le narrateur, est celle de l’oubli. Donnons un seul exemple, mais particulièrement probant on sait quelle longue et très cruelle souffrance fut pour le narrateur le départ, puis la mort d’Albertine. Le temps passe. Le narrateur est à Venise. Il reçoit un télégramme : la signature, à la suite d’une erreur de la poste, ne porte pas le prénom de Gilberte, mais celui d’Albertine…. ce que le narrateur accueille avec indifférence, car son amour pour la jeune fille en fleur est complétement mort. Proust a raison de penser que non seulement nous oublions le passé, mais que notre moi d’alors, le moi par exemple de celui qui aimait Albertine, n’existe plus, du moins en apparence. Il n’est pas question de mésestimer le temps retrouvé, mais nul mieux que Proust ne nous apprend que 1a mort ne coïncide pas avec la fin de notre existence, qu’elle ne se réduit point au trépas, mais que nous ne cessons de mourir tout an long de notre vie ». Sans doute la mémoire affective qui s’accompagne toujours d’une bouleversante félicité, ne vaut-elle que pour Proust lui-même, mais qui, plus que lui, a souffert de l’oubli! A un ami qui part pour un long voyage, Proust écrit “il est triste de leur séparation, mais qu’il est encore plus triste à la pensée que dans un certain temps il sera devenu indifférent. Si Proust avait été moins vulnérable, moins sensible à l’oubli, à la mort de soi, il n’aurait pas éprouvé une immense joie en retrouvant un moment du passé complètement oublié, perdu en apparence à jamais, en ayant ainsi la preuve que la mort, n’existe pas dans la mesure où il se retrouve lui-même tel qu’il était alors. A présent nous sommes mieux à même, non de partager l’incommunicable, mais de comprendre la félicité proustienne.

 

Extrait du chapitre consacré à Georges Bataille

S’il on est Balzac, on peut s’aventurer, avec plus ou moins de bonheur, à résumer La Chartreuse de Parme, mais aucun des trois récits majeurs de Bataille ne saurait être repris en peu de mots; même faire des citations est impossible et d’abord serait ridicule. On peut seulement dire avec Marguerite Duras:

« Edwarda restera suffisamment inintelligible des siècles durant… le sujet d’Edwarda se situant en deçà ou au-delà des acceptions particulières du langage, comment en rendrait-il compte! »

Par je ne sais quelle inconséquence, quel manque de lucidité cruel, il est arrivé à Bataille d’écrire de volumineux, d’ennuyeux ouvrages de sociologie ou d’anthropologie, par exemple L’Erotisme, Histoire de l’érotisme… sans parler de La Part maudite, mais ces ouvrages ne nous touchent guère, car ils parlent de l’érotisme, mais précisément ils ne font que parler de l’érotisme, à jamais extérieur au livre. Chez Bataille, non pas l’auteur des traités d’anthropologie (auxquels il a consacré beaucoup de temps!), mais l’auteur de textes érotiques, comme chez nul autre, même chez Sade, l’érotisme et l’écriture sont « coextensifs » pour reprendre la judicieuse remarque de Denis Hollier. Ces récits sont inséparables de leur trajet, de leur mouvement – celui d’une « crue », bien mise en lumière par Lucette Finas -, de leur caractère excessif, de plus en plus outrancier : aucune barrière ne limite la fiction. S’imaginer qu’écrire de tels récits érotiques est une partie de plaisir est une naïveté et d’abord un contresens, car l’acte d’écrire, touchant à l’extrême, rencontre le danger, que naturellement Bataille ne fuit pas, mais tout au contraire recherche. Ici encore Denis Hollier voit juste lorsqu’il écrit :

« Pour Bataille, l’écriture est une pratique réelle de déséquilibre, un risque réel pour la, santé, mentale. La folie est contamment en jeu dans ce qu’il écrit. Mais la “folie” est précisément l’inimitable écriture sans règle ni modèle . »

 

 

 

Extrait du chapitre consacré à Maurice Blanchot.

Si écrire est lié, au silence comme à son destin, si « le silence est la seule exigence qui vaille, “ on comprend que Blanchot ait pu dire : « … de cette écriture toujours extérieure à ce qui s’écrit, nulle trace, nulle preuve ne s’inscrit visiblement dans les livres. – N’arrive-t-il pas à Blanchot de nuancer cette affirrtiation ? Dans un texte dont E. Levinas souligne qu’il a été écrit « d’une façon prophétique plus de six mois avant Mai 68 », on peut lire ces lignes de Blanchot : « De cette écriture toujours exitérieure à ce qui s’écrit, nulle trace, nulle preuve ne s’inscrit visiblement dans les livres, peut-être de-ci de-là sur les murs ou sur la nuit, tout, de même qu’au début de l’hommes c’est l’encoche inutile ou 1’entaille de hasard marquée dans la pierre qui lui fit, à son insu, rencontrer l’illégitime écriture de l’avenir, un avenir non théologique qui n’est, pas encore le nôtre”. Puisque le silence doit passer par l’écriture pour s’accomplir n’est-ce pas lui qui devient impossible ? Dans La Part du feu , commentant encore une fois Mallarmé, Blanchot cite ce texte : « L’aramature du poème a lieu parmi le blanc du papier, significatif silence qu’il n’est pas moins beau de composer que le vers. » Blanchot remarque que ce blanc matériel « est peut-être le dernier vestige du langage qui s’efface, le mouvement même de sa disparition, mais il apparaît davantage encore comme l’emblème matériel d’un silence qui pour se laisser représenter doit se faire chose, ce qui reste ainsi le scandale du langage, son paradoxe insurmontable ». Blanchot résume ce paradoxe en cette formule : « Tout proférer, c’est aussi proférer le silence. C’est donc empêcher que la parole redevienne jamais silencieuse. De cette impossibilité, Mallarmé ne s’est jamais affranchi. » On peut ajouter: de cette impossibilité Blanchot ne s’est jamais affranchi. Il y a chez Blanchot une nostalgie de l’effacement, un amour de la discrétion, une passion pour le silence qui n’échappe à aucun lecteur, mais, par une contradiction insurmontable, ce désir d’une parfaite absence ne cesse de se montrer, de se dire, sans pouvoir par conséquent jamais s’accomplir. « Si le propre du langage est de rendre nulle la présence qu’il signifie », mais si le silence parfait est inaccessible, que peut faire l’écrivain ? Se tenir dans cet entre-deux, aussi près que possible du silence, et c’est pourquoi Blanchot donne la préférence, en particulier dans son oeuvre de fiction, à toutes les formes de langage qui font penser au silence. Lisons dans Au moment voulu ce que le narrateur dit de Claudia « cantatrice sublime » : « Des voix liées harmonieusement à la désolation, à la misère anonyme, j’en avais entendu, je leur avais prêté attention, mais celle-ci était indifférente et neutre, repliée en une région vocale où elle se dépouillait si complètement de toutes perfections superflues qu’elle semblait, privée d’elle-même. Cette voix, que fait-elle entendre ? Contrairement au « pathétique des registres graves », la voix de Claudia laisse très peu entendre. Son amie lui disait : « Tu as fait ta voix de pauvre » on bien « tu as chanté en blanc “.

« Lorsqu’on a commencé à faire sa part au silence, il l’exige toujours plus grande »…

Excerpt (in English from Ian Maclachlan’s Roger Laporte: The Orphic Text



 

Roger Laporte @ Wikipedia
Roger Laporte @ Editions P.O.L.
Roger Laporte @ Éditions Fata Morgana
Roger Laporte @ Gallimard

 

_____________

 


ÉCRAN DE NUIT #031 | ROGER LAPORTE


FRÉDÉRIC-YVES JEANNET – UCHRONIQUE 50: ROGER LAPORTE


Roger Laporte Heidegger

 

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** David Ehrenstein, Hi. Thank you very much for the Nico personal backgrounding. I was at that Whisky show too, and  the indifferent reaction to Hardin was painful, yeah. As I’ve said before, I met Nico once. I was at the Pyramid Club in the early 80s. Jim Fouratt brought Nico and Ari into the club. He introduced her to me. She was visibly jonesing for dope and a sweaty, unwell looking mess. She immediately started pumping me as to whether I knew where she could score heroin. I said I didn’t know, and she lost interest in me and moved on to someone else. ** _Black_Acrylic, Hi. Thanks for thanking Jane! Glad you liked the post a lot. Oh, your Maggie Broon video is beautiful! Everyone, Go watch a short psychedelic video that Ben ‘_Black_Acrylic’ Robinson made about Maggie Broon, The Broons’ glamorous daughter in the DC Thomson comic strip, back in 2008, here. It’s surely not a surprise to you that I really like your flash fiction’s inspiration and title. ** Misanthrope, Thanks for thanking Jane. Well, we need govt. permission to leave our homes here too, and a serious reason to, and only for an hour, and only with 1 km of our abodes. The vast majority of businesses and eateries and all museums and galleries, etc., etc. are closed, so it’s not that it’s all that less stringent. The main difference is that it feels less post-apocalyptic because this time Parisians are determined to get out and have some kind of life rather than staying in hiding like last time. We had our version of Veterans Day yesterday too — Armistice Day. Same occasion, same deal, a day off, wreath laying, some pomp, no big. ** Sypha, Hey. I’ve always heard vague stories about Nico’s racism, but I’ve never heard a specific example laid out, which doesn’t mean there aren’t any. I would say ‘The Marble Index’ is my favorite of hers too, but I also have a big fondness for ‘The End’. ** Ferdinand, Hi, F. I’ve only seen ‘Nico Icon’, which I didn’t think was all that great, but lots of people seem to. ** Steve Erickson, ‘Nico 1988’ does not seem like a must-see. I agree about ‘The Inner Scar’. I understand he’s bit difficult about his earliest and best work, or can be. But the restoration, etc. is inevitable. I don’t know that Julianna Barwick, but the Enya comparison is not exactly an impetus to rush towards it for me. ** Gus, Hi, Gus! Oh, have I not responded did to an email from you. I’ll go find it. I am slow, and my laptop broke, and I had no email for several days, so I am behind more than even usual. Things are okay. I’m feeling a little under the weather today, which is eerie under the circumstances, but otherwise working and hanging in there. You? Still totally down to have that chat. I’ll go find the mail from you that I seem to have missed, and let’s sort out when and how to do that. ** Armando, Good morning to you. Mm, I think I maybe did one total Nico post on my dead blog, but this is the first extant one. Of course she features in posts about related filmmakers and stuff. The zoom chat with my old friend was very nice. He’s a composer, musician and sound engineer. We’re the two members of our high school gang who succeeded at what we dreamed we would do artistically. The Rennes trip was good, good to get away, gave Gisele feedback on the current incarnation of her new theater piece and then straight back to Paris. A quickie. ‘Victoria’ sounds awfully good. I’m on it. Today my plan is reverse course on having woken up feel just slightly sickly. And buying cigarettes and food. Pretty much it. You, yours? ** Okay. Today’s restored post is quite old, and, sadly, Roger Laporte remains as overlooked now as he was all those years ago. So here’s my second attempt to do what little I can to try to reverse that neglect. See you tomorrow.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 DC's

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑