The blog of author Dennis Cooper

Month: August 2020 (Page 6 of 13)

Spotlight on … Brad Gooch Zombie 00 (2001)

 

‘Zombies, as we all know, are made, not born. But in Gooch’s weirdly blasé tale of sadomasochism and bondage, the unnamed narrator appears to possess zombie qualities from a very young age. On a visit to a museum in Scranton, Pa., with his parents, he is mesmerized by grainy, gray anthropological photographs of pain and abasement on display in the voodoo room. Soon afterwards, Mark, a sadistic 15-year-old, christens the younger boy “”Zombie”” and makes him his willing personal slave. Zombie performs simple tasks like sharpening pencils, but he is also sent on dangerous assignments that result in beatings by older bullies. The ensuing tale is Zombie’s search for the “”most colorful master.””

‘In high school Zombie is put to work by a hood named Mitch and his girlfriend, Paulette, who start a small crime wave. Eventually, Zombie gets caught vandalizing a funeral home and is kicked out of the house by his dad. Making his way to New York City, he discovers the subculture of s&m; clubs, where he meets Sir Edward, M.D. Sir Edward is a drug dealer and a very willing sadist, as is his nephew, an aspiring wrestler with the improbable moniker Wseal64735. But Sir Edward goes too far one night, and Zombie moves on to a bodybuilding public access cable performer named Control Freak. Control Freak is not the “”most colorful master,”” either, but he does give Zombie a one-way ticket to Haiti, where Zombie finally gets lucky.

‘Gooch takes his hero’s search for perfect zombiehood seriously. Sexually adventurous readers might find themselves genuinely sympathetic to Zombie’s quest, and at times even amused by his search for the perfect balance between fear and worship. However, this far-from-the-mainstream saga is not for the faint of heart.’ — PW

‘Images of the Marquis de Sade’s bedchamber and Andy Warhol’s Factory will undoubtedly assail readers of this defiantly outré third novel by Gooch, the biographer of Frank O’Hara, City Poet (1993) and author of such in-your-face fiction as The Golden Age of Promiscuity (1996).

‘The narrator is a nameless youth from a small Pennsylvania town who finds an objective correlative for his compulsive self-abasement in a Scranton museum’s “sacred voodoo chamber” exhibit. Abused and exploited by schoolmates and others (to whom he is, simply, “Zombie”), he leaves his scandalized, sorrowful parents, and — in a rather blatant imitation of James Purdy’s famous first novel, Malcolm — moves on to New York City.

‘Thereafter, the story becomes a series of searches for his true “master” and encounters with unconventional reality instructors and benefactors: a drug-addicted physician who insists he be addressed as “Sir Edward,” a muscle-bound TV talk-show impresario (“Control Freak”), the Son of God Himself (as worshipped by “the Jesus Men,” who hold a rally in Washington’s RFK Stadium), genuine-article “zombie masters” met during a Haitian visit, and, after Zombie’s return to Manhattan, miscellaneous denizens of the lurid “club Crypt,” where people from his past mysteriously appear. (Perhaps — though Gooch doesn’t spell this out — he’s seeing his life pass before him, just as he’s about to leave it.)

‘The novel isn’t nearly as awful as it sounds: Gooch writes crisp, surprisingly evocative straightforward sentences, and has found a resonant, troubling metaphor for the kind of passivity and self-loathing capable of shading into the destructive recesses of sadomasochism. If you like Anne Tyler and Jan Karon, you may want to pass on Zombie 00. Still, this is, in its uniquely empathetic and perceptive way, really a rather successful exploration of a hapless life lived on the psychosexual razor’s edge.’ — Kirkus

 

___
Further

Brad Gooch Website
‘In the Gritty New York of the ’70s and ’80s, Not Exactly a Model Life’
‘PHOTOS: The Golden Age of Brad Gooch’
Brad Gooch @ Twitter
Brad Gooch @ goodreads
‘Stroking my inner boyfriend’
‘Impertinent Questions with Brad Gooch’
‘Are You Cool Enough to Read This Book?’
‘Family’, a short story by Brad Gooch
‘Club Culture’, by Brad Gooch
‘Marina Warner’s Stranger Magic Reconsiders the Arabian Nights’, by Brad Gooch
‘Carver Was the Rage’, by Brad Gooch
‘How Gossip Became History’, by Brad Gooch
‘Maugham’s Love Life’, by Brad Gooch
‘The Library of America interviews Brad Gooch about Flannery O’Connor’
‘Brad Gooch, Author of Smash Cut, Remembers Howard Brookner and Gay Culture in ’70s & ’80s NYC’
Audio: Brad Gooch on NPR’s ‘Bookworm’
Fashion Reverie Interview: Brad Gooch
‘Touched by Evil’
Brad Gooch on Philip Taaffe
Buy ‘Zombie 00’

 

___
Extras


Brad Gooch & Tim Dlugos: Public Access Poetry 8 18 77


Brad Gooch on The Mineshaft for the 6th Annual Last Address Tribute Walk


Uncle Howard clip – Date Books (Brad Gooch)


Brad Shariati


Book Talk with Brad Gooch: “Rumi’s Secret: The Life of the Sufi Poet of Love”


Brad Gooch And Kalin Sorenson

 

___
Interview

 

THE STANDARD: Most of the events of this book took place more than thirty years ago—why write about them now?
BRAD GOOCH: The love and loss story of my relationship with Howard was something that I always felt I needed to tell. Also, I often get young gay guys asking me, what was it like in the seventies?

You were once a young gay guy freshly arrived in the city—what’s it like to meet a young version of yourself?
It’s weird—it’s like being the ancient mariner or some thing. I moved with my now husband Paul to Chelsea, right across the street from the Chelsea Hotel, without it sinking in that Howard and I had lived there for three years. We opened a copy shop together right on that block. Howard had died a block away at London Terrace.

Every morning I would go walking down with my gym bag and look up and see this fifth floor window, where Howard and I had lived, where I had my 30th birthday party and things. So, it started triggering these memories. And writing this in some way relieved me of these ghosts.

With the amount of partying in the book, I imagine memories of the period aren’t totally reliable. How did you do your research?
I kept diaries and archives. It wasn’t organized, but it turns out I still had the chopsticks wrapper from when Howard wrote his phone number down for me the night we met at this gay bar, the Ninth Circle. He wrote it on the back of a chopstick wrapper and I still had it.

So, you were attracted to New York by this idea of an artistic life. When you arrived, what was the artistic and literary culture that you walked into?
The literary culture was the same as all the rest of the culture I think, which was that everybody was out of their mind all the time–partying and going to clubs. So what was absent in New York in the seventies was careers.

It’s hard to imagine, as someone who pays present-day New York City rent, what New York without careers was like. What does it do to a group of people in their twenties when you take the idea of career out of it?
Oh it’s just so much fun. But an important part of it was that rents were so little. I lived on Perry Street in the Village for $160, which seemed steep. That’s what made it possible. It seemed like people didn’t have jobs, although they sort of did.

It was great, because actually a tremendous amount of work was done in that period, and people look kind of nostalgically to all that. It was kind of done without noticing, so those Robert Mapplethorpe photographs grew out of his nightlife, a certain amount of them. He was at leather bars every night, and you wouldn’t necessarily imagine how much work was going on.

It was kind of serious fun.

You say you weren’t careerists—were you confident that the work coming out of your scene had value and would get recognized?
We were even coming out of a previous kind of generation in a way, which was the Frank O’Hara generation. When I came to New York to go to college in 1971, there were still Frank O’Hara parties. He’d been killed five years before, but there were all of these artists and poets who would get together, and they were famous enough at the time, like Allen Ginsberg and William Burroughs.

And then there was a real sense in the group that Dennis Cooper’s opinion of your poem mattered more than The New Yorker. It was mythology in a way, but we all believed it. We were living the idea that our friends were the most interesting important people. So that made it viable.

We had a backdrop fantasy to go on, which was the old bohemian idea where you don’t have any money, and you’re putting all this energy into your work and no one understands except these 12 cool people you hang with. It also helps that we actually were having all of this fun. That’s the thing that can be missing.

When did you start to take having a career more seriously?
I was writing poems and stories and I was in graduate school at Columbia. Then I got into modeling, and I was in Paris and Milan, and then I was back in New York. Then I was with Howard, and for a while we ran a copy shop in the Chelsea Hotel. I was writing porn reviews for the New York Native, and then somebody at GQ saw them, and as a joke had me write something.

Was this VHS porn?
No this was pre-VHS. This was films in theaters. A lot was going on in the theaters

So then you started working at Vanity Fair?
I had a friend who was working at something called Manhattan Inc, a new magazine, and I did a profile of Diane Abrill, who was a downtown personality. And then somehow Tina Brown saw this and got me into doing Vanity Fair. I was way over my head, as I talked about in the book, so she sent me off to do these kinds of interviews with movie stars, and cover stories, and it was very hard because I didn’t know how to write these things.

Was competition an issue in your circle?
Yes, in such a small little postage stamp size area, there was competition. It was intense, but it always seemed that art was a pretext for…getting laid and doing drugs and doing all of these kinds of things. And that turned out be the thing that lasted, the others went away. But you know, there was a party situation. So…

If everyone is getting laid, that takes the edge off, right? Sexuality democratizes things. It wasn’t like we were all only hanging out with each other, there was a relaxedness to the period.

You have written about the continuity of gay life and mentioned that one of your first boyfriends was Frank O’Hara’s last boyfriend.
J.J. Mitchell.

Do you feel like that continuity still persists in New York today, or has it been severed?
I don’t think it does. Allen Ginsberg, some time around then, traced some kind of lineage that he was six steps removed from sleeping with Walt Whitman. This kind of lineage was very important.

The six degrees of Kevin Bacon for sexual partners.

This all cracked due to AIDS more than anything. That period got flattened into history quickly.

I had my first book of stories published by a gay press. We didn’t think a regular press would ever publish these stories, and for a long time they didn’t. But the upside was that there were all of these different gay bookstores and you could go on extended book tours to all of these cities with a built in audience. People really bought books, and they were really interested.

Were you intimidated being quite young and a poet and meeting someone like Allen Ginsberg?
I met Allen Ginsberg — maybe I’m a stalker — when I was about 17. And I sent him this, you know, kind of poem that I had written. And it just was a complete imitation of him.

And then he wrote back, I still have it, “You do go on worse than I do…” It was kind of a put down, from this great, great figure.

 

___
Book

Brad Gooch Zombie 00
The Overlook Press

Zombie00 is a touching story that explores the dark recesses of human desire and offers a glimpse into how we connect.

‘Meet “Zombie,” a strange and remarkable young man, growing up in Truckstown, Pennsylvania. His earliest childhood memories of visiting the “Sacred Voodoo Chamber” in the nearby Scranton Art Museum leave him in thrall and help spark in him a process of “zombification” that will last a lifetime. Fear and worship become his guiding forces as he stumbles through life wondering if there are more of his kind or if he is alone. After a series of petty crimes, committed at the behest of his first master, Zombie is given a tiny inheritance and a one-way bus ticket to New York City. He embarks on a weird, surprisingly funny and ultimately poignant odyssey where he meets those who will be responsible for his destiny.’ — The Overlook Press

Excerpt

How Zombie passed his earliest years in Truckstown, Pa.

It all started at the Everhart Museum. The way to the museum was blocked by a huge ugly fountain. What’s the big difference between a sculpture and a fountain? The art museum was near a coal museum, where you descended into a cavern that was brightly lit. It was a wormhole. A fake coal mine. There was another mine a few miles away where they’d turn out the lights and you’d be lowered in a bucket to worship the cool blackness. I mean tour it, not worship it.

Anyway. There I was with my folks. They were nearby, in front or lagging behind. They were in their own world, I always thought. Now I realize it was I who was in my own world. The museum rose before us in a park called Nay Aug Park that never seemed quite right. The museum seemed quite right. It was made of tan stones.

The inside, though, is where the point is. The best part of the art museum was that it didn’t have much art. Instead it had artifacts. I was often scared in there. I was scared by the gigantic black-marble-and-onyx stairs. I was scared because there was no air. I was scared because of the feeling of ancient spells being released inadvertently. I knew none of the paintings on the walls had anything scary in them. So I tried the more adventurous and three-dimensional shows.

My favorite show was the glowing rocks, which you entered through heavy black drapes that hung down over the doorway. Heavy, weighted, leaden, black velvet drapes. You pushed your way in. Inside what seemed the smallest room in the world, acloset of a room, a horizontal case ran alongside the wall, low enough to view. Then there would be a trick with the lights. Either the electric lights of the chamber would be flicked off, or there never was any electric light in the chamber and the lights that would go snap would be those in the case, leaving only a phosphorescent glow of different rocks with veins made of blue chips of stars or of the green hair of moss. That’s how magical it was, I swear. Then you’d leave with the rest of the onlookers. Not feeling alienated from anybody at all. The rocks cured me. They healed me. I really felt I needed to be healed.

I tried to carry that sensation into the rest of my life. I did it by growing moon rocks in my bedroom. You brought them to life by dropping a liquid chemical from an eyedropper held up in the air. The rocks slowly began to grow and ooze with pink and orange colors. So the transformation brought them into the same area in my mind as the glowing rocks at the museum. But those in the museum were geological and were protected.

The mummy produced in me a feeling similar to that produced by the glowing rocks. Of course none of these things mean anything to you. Glowing rocks? A mummy? Inside a room on the second floor was a mummy. The mummy was lying in a coffin or boat or shadow shaped like the silhouette about it, the way cartoon monsters are given dark or bright auras that hug them. It was wrapped in bandages. I was amazed that Scranton, Pennsylvania, was important enough to be entrusted with one of the ancient Egyptian dead. That made me feel a little better about myself, since Truckstown was located near Scranton.

But nothing compared to the sacred voodoo chamber. There the movies played in my head no matter what time of day or night. It was as if I were born there. Except when particles of dust were revealed dancing away by overhead schoolroomish lights and windows. I longed to be inside the sacred voodoo chamber. It barely looked sacred to anyone else, probably. Most of it was old, gray, grainy photographs taken by anthropologists and ethnopharmacologists. One showed a dancer pierced by needles. A colored one was a photograph of a woman in red. But late in the afternoon the oozing green candles they allowed to burn for dramatic effect picked up a glow from the crossed, burnished bronze weaponry. A round straw fan was tucked into a wall as well. I can’t explain it. No one was there. The candles started talking to me. They talked without words, as in a dream. One said, Look up to heaven! I felt very special. To actually get a little bit of help and guidance from beyond.

That’s when I knelt on the cold stone floor, which was swirling with veins of white and black coloring. My little legs were trembling. My knees hurt from the unusual pressure on them. I folded my hands together in a gesture of prayer and supplication. I was begging and saying thank you. My heart felt very warm for the first time in years. I was heating up my own heart. Or the forces were heating up my own heart for me. I inhaled rapturously.

Suddenly a stupid, fumbling hand was on my shoulder. The hand of an old fainthearted guard. I imagined he would be punished for this insurrection by the forces in the room. If not now, later. He was followed by my folks. They knew I wasn’t hurt. They knew I was into one of my “acts,” as they mistakenly labeled them. But they were mortified that this time the incident was taking place in public, not just within the entrails of our house. It showed them up badly. It said that something was wrong with them, not just with me. Which they knew too well, though it was never discussed in any way.

They rushed me out of there. Stashed me in the back of a car. Their car. Their lime green mobile, a stuck-together assemblage of metal and fur. We went home without a word. Which is the way the procedure usually went. What could they say to me that they wouldn’t really be saying to themselves? It was a grisly way for a freak like myself to live. Especially now that I had been made a zombie for the first time in my life that I was conscious and fully aware of. I’m sure there were earlier slips and slides.

The zombification often started with just such a falling to the knees.

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** David Ehrenstein, Yes. Did you see her Joyce film? I thought it was strangely very, very good. I really like R-G’s films, but I don’t think anything he did beats his novels. ** Misanthrope, I read … most but not all of ‘Finnegan’s Wake’, which is, you know, unbelievable, but it fits smoothly into the kind of difficult fiction I read constantly for pleasure than I think it slides as easily into your reading habits, so I don’t know. Intimidating, yes, in any case. Yeah, normal twink porn starring cute young frolickers quickly glazes my eyes. I guess it’s sort of my attitude to fiction, visual or written, in general, i.e. show me something I don’t expect and/or already know or something. Anyway, not weird of you, yeah. Enjoy the break. ** G, Hi! Oh, cool. Her work is really special and was way ahead of its time too. Preparing for teaching, right. So, so many of my friends are in the middle doing that exact same thing while trying to figure out how to maximise the Zoom context right now. Good luck with that. Thank you about ‘Ugly Man’! The publication of ‘The Weaklings XL’ was kind of a debacle. The press was dying at the time, and they didn’t send out any review copies, and they didn’t print many books, and it went out of print quickly. I hadn’t thought about it being reprinted. I mean, yeah, if some press wanted to republish it, I’d be way into that. I think the poems in that book are my best ones. I might see a visiting friend today, so that could be blissful. I hope your day is bliss central! ** Matthew Doyle, Hi, Matt! How very awesome to see you! How nice that the post aligned with the thinking-out of your syllabus. Cool. Paris has been hanging in there, and, boy, am I grateful. Things are starting to look just a little dicey of late, but we’ll see. I don’t know Connor Willumsens ‘Anti-Gone’, no. I’ll go hunt it. And I’l hit that trailer as soon as I’m outta here. What a fascinating sounding project! I really hope I’ll get to see it. Any at least tentative plans to perform it? Is that even possible yet? You teach at PCC! My alma mater! I kind of made the final, official decision to become a writer while I was there. How cool. Are you enjoying it? Another friend of mine, Brian Tucker, is teaching there. Do you know him? Again, I’ll watch the teaching video lickety-split. Thanks for the share in advance, man. 29 Palms! I used to go to Joshua Tree quite a lot, and I often lodged in 29 Palms. I liked it. It was kind of spooky. Spooky and extreme high heat are a weird combination. The Dumont film is worth seeing, yeah. Quite different from his more familiar filmmaking style, but, yeah, fun, a watcher. Excellent to get to talk with you. Don’t be a stranger, if it suits you. That would be swell. ** Bill, My, of course, pleasure. Yeah, I saw a crazy video of SF getting bombarded with lightning strikes. Wow. ** Steve Erickson, I could, and I even should, but I suppose I fear those insane people. I’m a big Jim Steinman fan, as I think you know. Hosted a post about his stuff. I think he’s kind of a weird minor genius. ** h(now j), Hi! Uh, hm, I don’t remember the exact reason I did that post. I’m a big admirer, obviously, and I had thought about it for a while. I must have seen something written about her or something that jogged me. Yes, I agree with you. And I too think her Joyce film is amazing and strangely so overlooked. The weather here is kind of wonderful right now. A blur of dying summer heat and the first broad hints of brisk fall. All I know is that ‘I Wished’ is supposed to come out late next year, date too be determined. I haven’t heard anything newer from the publisher. I’m guessing they’ll nail a date down this fall or something. Good luck with all! ** Right. Although Brad Gooch is best known for his biographies (of Frank O’Hara, Flannery O’Connor, and Rumi), he’s a also a completely stellar fiction writer, although few seem to know that since all of his novels and fiction books (‘Jailbait’, ‘Scary Kisses’, ‘The Golden The of Promiscuity’, and today’s spotlit novel) are very out of print, criminally. ‘Zombie00’ is his most recent and probably least known novel, and it’s a super good read, and that’s why I’m foisting it on you. Give it a shot. See you tomorrow.

Mary Ellen Bute Day

 

‘In 1940 the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) Film Library actively began to document a rich international experimental cinema, and staged a show featuring the works of Hans Richter, Fernand Léger, Man Ray, Marcel Duchamp, Len Lye, Ted Nemeth and Mary Ellen Bute. Richter, Duchamp, Léger, Man Ray, and Lye – filmmakers working in Europe – have all become familiar names in any standard text of avant-garde cinema, and their films included in this show have become cinema classics. Mary Ellen Bute and her movies, however, are practically unknown today.

‘Such a fate was not unusual for prewar American experimental filmmakers. They worked in the 1930s and 1940s within a fragile support network and, after World War II, received only sporadic attention from serious film critics when a new generation of filmmakers achieved prominence. The individual filmmaker of the prewar era had to be not only a filmmaker but also a distributor, critic, and educator for an experimental cinema. The reclamation of the individual filmmaker can reveal a great deal about the definition and workings of an experimental cine- ma in the United States before World War II. Bute’s career exemplifies how the artist-filmmaker during this period successfully invented experimental cinema at both the individual and the systemic levels. She achieved an individual aesthetic style, separate and distinct from her European counterparts, and she devised strategies for the distribution, exhibition, and reception of experimental cinema in the United States.

Ten of Bute’s films, made between 1934 and 1953, belong to the category of cinema known as “abstract films,” “motion paintings,” or “experimental anima- tion.” They place Bute in a painterly-filmic tradition alongside Richter, Viking Eggeling, Oskar Fischinger, Lye, and Norman McLaren. Yet if Bute’s films today seem easily contained within a discrete aesthetic category and tradition of cinema, they were less easily situated within the contemporary avant-garde’s rigorous and exclusionary measures for film art. Unlike most experimental filmmakers before and after World War II, Bute did not explicitly claim an anti-Hollywood stance for her aesthetic principles. In- deed, she publicly situated her films not in resistance to Hollywood, but in conjunction with it, since she marketed her films as short subjects for commercial, theatrical bookings. In the 1940s and 1950s, Bute’s films opened for Hollywood features in Radio City Music hall as well as theaters across the country. It is, however, precisely this tension between the films’ elitist modernist aesthetics and their popular reception as pretty amusements that is worth further exploration.

‘Trained as a painter at the Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts in the early 1920s, Bute identified with the dominant intellectual preoccupations of the mod- ernist avant-garde. Like Richter and Eggeling in Europe, Bute tried to express movement and con- trolled rhythms in time-sequence paintings. Like Richter and Eggeling, she subsequently decided that painting itself was too limited a medium to represent time and motion. Throughout the 1920s and early 1930s, she extended painterly concerns to music and light so as to represent the kinetics of modern, fast-paced, highly technologized life. Like many other painters, she understood that such concerns were within the mainstream of contemporary art, the logi- cal outcome of a linear tradition established through Paul Cézanne’s abstractions of form and color, Cubism’s attempts to produce “surface sensations to the eye,” the Italian Futurists, the American Synchronists, and Wassily Kandinsky’s paintings of relationships between colors and music, works that Bute herself called “abstract compositions based on an arbitrary chromatic scale of senses.”

‘After she graduated from art school and moved to New York City, Bute attempted to transcend the limitations of painting through combining theatrical performance, music, colored lighting, and two dimensional pieces in stage lighting and design. She at- tended the Yale School of Drama, and following her graduation in 1925 and a subsequent trip around the world as a drama director for a “floating university,” Bute worked with the inventors of the new light organs, musical keyboard instruments that could simultaneously produce and create moving colors on a screen. From the Russian physicist and color organ inventor Leon Theremin, in particular, Bute developed a sophisticated orientation to art as an elaboration of the scientific phenomena of color and light. Theremin taught her to use light on a static surface and how not to use light haphazardly. While Bute was working with Theremin, a third person joined the team. Russian-born Joseph Schillinger ranked among America’s most sought-after composition teachers for his methodology which reduced musical elements to geometric relationships. Schillinger’s students included popular music icons Tommy Dorsey, George Gershwin, and Glenn Miller. With his application of mathematical concepts to music composition, Schillinger taught Bute a central means by which she could coordinate musical composition with painting in shared terms of light, form, time and color. Bute went on to apply concepts from her collaborative experimentations with Theremin and Schillinger in her own “absolute film” titled “Rhythm in Light” (1934).

‘Bute’s four films released between 1940 and 1950 represent a third phase of “absolute films” and the most mature of her drawn films. Textual inscriptions that introduced each of these films marked Bute’s cinema as educationally edifying by announcing the film’s intention “to present a new type of film-ballet.” Such titles presented Bute’s cinema from the outset as promoting appreciation for tunes already popularly canonized as acceptable highbrow music.

‘“Tarantella” (1940) is a five-minute color film animat- ed from more than seven thousand drawings and set to original piano music performed by Edwin Gerschefski. Bute positioned her short films in commercial movie theaters as toney introductions, “class” or “art” acts that would precede specific Hollywood prestige productions. “Tarantella” opened for “Paris Waltz” at New York City’s Paris Theatre, where Bute’s original animation art was displayed in the lobby.

‘The commercial premieres of Bute’s films often occurred a few years after their completion. But if the films did not always win immediate commercial success, they enjoyed longevity without regard for timeliness or topicality. Bute attributed their long runs to the films’ abstract nature: “It’s just like music. You can see it over and over.”’ — Lauren Rabinovitz

 

___
Stills





































 

___
Further

Mary Ellen Bute @ Light Cone
CVM’s Bute Research Pages
Mary Ellen Bute: Seeing Sound
MEB @ IMDb
The Films of Pioneering American Animator Mary Ellen Bute (1930s-1950s)
Mary Ellen Bute: “Film Pioneer”
Expressive Motion in the Early Films of Mary Ellen Bute
Mary Ellen Bute Papers @ Yale University
Book: Mary Ellen Bute, Pioneer Animator
MEB @ The Heroine Collective
MEB @ letterboxd
Seeing Sound – Mary Ellen Bute tribute.
This Animation Pioneer Turned Music into Pure Light
The River’s Roar: Mary Ellen Bute’s Passages from James Joyce’s Finnegans Wake
MEB @ Sketch Gallery
The Possibilities of Animation as demonstrated by Mary Ellen Bute
MEB @ MUBI
Mary Ellen Bute’s Synchronization of Sound and Image
Experiments In Love and Film: The Wondrous Work of Movie Explorers Mary Ellen Bute and Ted Nemeth
The visual music of Mary Ellen Bute

 

____
Extras


Mary Ellen Bute according to the BBC


Mary Ellen Bute: Mother of Animation


Mathematical Beauty: Visual Music by Mary Ellen Bute

 

____
Interview

 

For ten years or more, avant garde film maker Mary Ellen Bute sat on the front row of Society meetings. Her full-length film, Passages from ‘Finnegans Wake,‘ was adapted from the Barnard College production of Mary Manning’s work by the same name. Conceived and carried on in concert with Frances Steloff, Padraic Colum, and other Joyce Society members, it remains the most innovative cinematic interpretation of the spirit of Joyce’s last work ever attempted.

Bute addressed her response to those who questioned her apparent shift from abstract film to Joyce in the biographical note for the New York Film Association:

“I am often asked how I moved from abstract films to Finnegan’s Wake? It’s plausible…Joyce’s premise: ‘One great part of every human existence is passed in a state which cannot be rendered sensible by the use of wide-awake language, cut-and-dry grammar and go-ahead plot’ is, like abstract films, about our ‘inner’ landscape. Joyce, like Whitman, and much Art, is about the essence of our Being; so, we’re traveling on the same terrain.”

And in an interview about the film with Gretchen Weinberg for Film Culture in 1964 she described herself as:

“a Finnegans Wake girl . . . I may never do another Joyce work but I would like to make several films on different aspects of Finnegans Wake, . . Several people have already prepared treatments which could easily be adapted for this , . . Joyce
loved the movies and hoped his works would be filmed.”

In the Camera Three interview we have the opportunity to hear Bute recount her interest in the Wake directly. She explains that she was “first exposed” to the Wake at a friend’s ranch in Texas and was immediately drawn to the singular response each reader could bring to the work, and that she was immediately struck by its visual potential.

“The whole feeling that you were on your own in Finnegans Wake was very encouraging,” she says.

She took Professor Tindall’s course and eventually saw the Barnard production of Mary Manning’s play “Passages from Finnegans Wake”. Manning, a childhood friend of Samuel Beckett’s, was a founder of The Poets’ Theatre in Cambridge. Bute was attracted to the humor of the play & realized that, for copyright reasons, it would be easier to produce her film from the play than from the original Wake. Eventually Manning helped co-write the film treatment and the script.

The interview also affords a chance to see the noted scholar Tindall discuss Finnegans Wake as well as his reactions to Bute’s film. Before the start of the Joyce Society, Frances Steloff had arranged for Tindall and noted book collector James Gilvarry to offer unofficial instruction to those who were new to Joyce’s work.

When host Macandrew asks him to describe Joyce’s Finnegans Wake to the t.v. audience, Tindall replies that:

“Nothing could be easier to describe. It’s about everything and everybody at all times… Read it closely, scratch your head, and there it is.”

Bute the Joyce aficianado comes through clearly as she discusses not only the time commitment to completing the film but the nuances of Joyce’s text. When Tindall discusses Finnegans Wake as being a story about a family she explains that:

“We did take this family story that Mr. Tindall spoke of just now. . .You see, Shem and Shaun, as well as being Finnegan’s sons, are also conflicting parts of himself. He has to come to terms with these parts–realize the excesses–in order to wake up. I was very eager to do the waking up part of Finnegans Wake–you know, the part where Joyce says ‘it’s the problem passion play of the millentary going strong since creation.'”

Tindall is complimentary about Bute’s film and explains that even though Finnegans Wake “appeals to the ear,” Bute has “translated, transformed and transfigured it into visual form.” And that the problem of “selection and condensing the material took fortitude.”

But in spite of this “fortitude,” one later senses that Tindall can’t dismiss his respect for the written text so easily. In a particularly compelling part of the interview, Macandrew asks Bute if the language used in the film was a problem, because the actors were essentially ‘speaking words that had never existed before.’

Bute replies that she was delighted with the cast:

“You see it’s an Irish cast. Most had had great experience. And you know how Joyce, among other things, wrote the Irish dialect into many of the words. If they’re pronounced the way they’re spelt they come out with a bit of an Irish brogue with a Dublin lilt. And this cast was theater trained–none of them had been under the camera before and that was very nice. We took the shooting script and rehearsed it like a play from start to finish and for quite a while til they got the rhythm and the whole thing going. Then I broke it down into sequences and shots and put it under the camera.

By that time they were ordering coffee and discussing groceries in Joycean.”

When John Macandrew comments that he feels that the use of subtitles is a “tremendous bridge” for the audience, Bute pleasantly responds with:

“It makes it so much more entertaining when you see..if one of the celebrants says ’tis really the truth’ and you see ‘Tis (she spells out) ‘R,’ ‘A,’ ‘R,’ ‘E,’ ‘L,’ ‘Y’ the truth.’ It’s much funnier than if you just think it’s a British pronunciation of ‘really.’ You see?

And throughout if it’s a ‘wallstrait oldparr’ then you know that the actors are saying what you think they’re saying.”

Bute laughs delightfully, but at this point the discussion becomes a bit energized as Tindall the literary scholar objects and we perhaps get a sense of the mentor the Joyce initiates experienced at the Gotham Book Mart: “But how are you going to understand what ‘oldparr’ means? That takes 15 minutes of contemplation and this goes right by….”

Bute interrupts: “But now you know how we do that–we have him falling out of bed so it’s visual, it’s being said….”

Tindall interrupts: “Wall Street…..falling off a wall…..wall street crash….par value stocks….’oldparr?'”

Bute shakes her head: “Oh now please, we had to simplify it a little. But we did have a montage of all that.”

Tindall still objects that the viewer “cannot get more than a little fleeting part of this tremendous whole and that’s the problem.”

At this point Mary Ellen Bute concurs, but we know from watching the film with its energized editing techniques & inclusions of such modern day images as television screens & rockets that she took seriously her belief that one could come to Finnegans Wake on their own terms. In her 1964 Film Culture interview with Gretchen Weinberg she pointed out that “the film is not a translation of the book but a reaction to it.”

The interview contains other tales of her experiences with the film. She says she had one typical “Joycean” calamity after another, and describes calling Erik Barnouw of Columbia University to come down for a screening. She apologized that the film took so long to make–after all it was in preparation for 7 years. But she is obviously delighted in relating Barnouw’s response that “it would be presumptious to do Joyce too fast!”.

The interview concludes with a few segments from the film. Mary Ellen Bute must have been satisfied with the outcome of the film, because in that same year it won a prize at Cannes for best feature film debut.

 

____________
10 of Mary Ellen Bute’s 17 films

____________
w/ Ted Nemeth, Melville Webber Rhythm in Light (1935)
‘Premiered at Radio City Music Hall, 1935. In RHYTHM IN LIGHT, the artist uses visual materials as the musician uses sound. Mass and line an brilliant arabesques from the inexhaustible imagination of the artist perform a dance to the strains of Edvard Grieg’s music. The visual and aural materials are related both structurally and rhythmically – a mathematical system being used to combine the two means of expression.’ — Light Cone


the entirety

 

_____________
Synchromy No. 2 (1936)
‘Kaleidoscopic arches, classical busts, and swirling staircases drift comfortably in time with Richard Wagner’s “The Evening Star,” gently melting and flowing along with the song. Oddly (at least for this viewer), neither the music nor the imagery command your full attention. Rather, the film seems to encourage the melding of the senses: sight and sound weave together into a shared expression. When the five or so minutes are up, it’s hard to decide how to categorize what you’ve just experienced. Was it animation set to music, or music set to animation?’ — Stylus Radio


the entirety

 

__________
Dada (1936)
‘One of the livelist of Mary Ellen Bute’s abstract films, DADA was intended to be part of a Universal Newsreel segment, showing Bute and her partner Ted Nemeth at work in their tiny New York studio. No copies of the newsreel itself are known to exist at this time.’ — Cecile Starr

Excerpt

 

____________
Synchromy No. 4: Escape (1937)
‘Beginning with Escape, Mary Ellen began to work in color, and used more conventional animation for the main themes in the music, but still combining it with “special effect” backgrounds–sometimes swirling liquids, clouds or fireworks, other times light effects created with conventional stage lighting, such as imploding or exploding circles made by rising in or out a spotlight.’ — awn.com


the entirety

___________
w/ Ted Nemeth Parábola (1937)
‘Sculptor Rutherford Boyd worked in collaboration with Nemeth and Bute, whose NYC production facilities were placed at his disposal. Filmed, frame by frame, in a sequence of stills that varied the arrangement of sculptural pieces under controlled illumination, PARABOLA introduced the potential of a new design technique.’ — Douglas Dreishpoon


the entirety

 

____________
Tarantella (1940)
‘This new medium of expression is the Absolute Film. Here the artist creates a world of color, form, movement and sound in which the elements are in a state of controllable flux, the two materials (visual and aural) being subject to any conceivable interrelation and modification.’ — letterboxd


the entirety

 

_____________
w/ Norman McLaren, Ted Nemeth Spook Sport (1940)
‘Animated by McLaren, utilizing his adroit ink-on-film technique, Bute’s film visualizes Saint Säen’s music. It features colored globes, ellipses, and triangles that move ghost-like over monochromatic backgrounds, communicating the notion of spirits rising from a graveyard. Commercially Bute’s most successful animation, it ran for months at Radio City Music Hall.’ — Jan-Christopher Horak


the entirety

 

______________
Color Rhapsodie (1948)
‘Many pieces of music may share exactly the same mathematics quantities, but the qualities that make one of them a memorable classic and another rather ordinary or forgettable involves other non-mathematical factors, such as orchestral tone color, nuance of mood and interpretation. In Mary Ellen’s weakest works, like  Color Rhapsodie, she is betrayed precisely by this problem, using gaudily-colored, percussive images of fireworks explosions during a soft, sensuous passage–perfectly timed mathematically, but unsuited to mood and tone color.’ — awn.com


Trailer

 

_____________
w/ Ted Nemeth Abstronic (1952)
‘I wanted to manipulate light to produce visual compositions in time continuity much as a musician manipulates sound to produce music. It was particularly while I listened to music that I felt an overwhelming urge to translate my reactions and ideas into visual form that would have the ordered sequence of music.’ — Mary Ellen Bute


Trailer

 

____________
Passages from James Joyce’s Finnegans Wake (1965)
‘A dead man lies in a coffin. Mourners drink and dance around him. Suddenly, the man sits up. The mourners push him back down. Thunder cracks. Buildings collapse. A bride runs through the city streets. Roses float on the water. These high-contrast black-and-white images, in evocative collage, make up the texture of Mary Ellen Bute’s 1966 film Passages from James Joyce’s Finnegans Wake. Filmed in Dublin and the Ted Nemeth Studio facilities in New York, with an Irish cast, it was a labor of love for Bute, a longtime member of the James Joyce Society, who made her name as an experimental abstract animator in the 1930s. Bute collaborated on the screen treatment with Irish actress and playwright Mary Manning, who had already done an adaptation of the book for the stage. Further work on the script was done by Bute, Ted Nemeth, and Romana Javitz.

Passages is an attempt to re-create the book’s linguistic inventions through the use of montage, collage, and music. Since Finnegans Wake is about a man going to sleep, it’s almost the platonic ideal of “universal.” Bute was fascinated by the malleable quality of the text, how each reader has a unique “way in.” The text shifts, depending on your entry point. Bute’s version has aspects of a variety show: she incorporates theater, singing, magic tricks, soliloquies, a burlesque bump-and-grind. She even includes a “television commercial,” with a woman advertising cold cream while lying on a zebra-striped rug. In a 1964 interview with Film Culture, Bute said, “The film is not a translation of the book but a reaction to it.” Yet there’s not a word in the film that’s not in the book. One of her most important choices was to use subtitles, showing Joyce’s spelling of what was being said on screen. It makes the point that Finnegans Wake’s language may look incomprehensible, but when spoken out loud it’s really quite clear.

‘Bute’s film played at Cannes. Some scholars chastised her for dragging Joyce down into the muck, but such snobs ignored his love of pop culture. (Mutt and Jeff are recurring characters in Finnegans Wake, after all.) Joyce was fascinated by cinema, too. In the early 1900s, while living in Trieste, he decided to bring the exciting new art form to Ireland, and so he started the Cinematograph Volta, operating in Dublin. His involvement was short-lived, but it shows his interest in the “now,” in the future—in art for all, not just the elite few.’ — Sheila O’Malley


the entirety

 

 

*

p.s. Hey. ** JM, Hi, J. I trust your government from afar and figure they’ll sort it. Our cases are going up now, and new/old restrictions are looming ominously on our possibly immediate horizon. I agree about the word ‘slut’s’ potential affability. Ooh, Gary Lutz, yum. Take care, pal. ** Natty Soltesz, Natty! I know, how about that? (The Lucille Ball reference). Dude, how good to see you! We can meet up here, and we do, at the least for now because things are starting to downswing. Yes, good timing on the Paris visit. It’s still great Paris — at the moment at least — even under the circumstances, but fuck knows when anyone in your neck of the world will get to visit again. I didn’t know you have a Patreon. I’ll find it. I had a couple of Patreon things I was following, but I bailed on them for forgotten reasons. Yes, Aaron Brown actually directed or co-directed three short videos/films based on stories of mine in ‘Ugly Man’ for Dazed and Confused a few years ago under the moniker Focus Creeps, and they were quite good. They might still be online, I’m not sure. Yeah, scary but uninteresting fantasy seems really, really big in the States right now. Man, you take care, and I’ll go seek out your Patreon, and please come back any old time. ** Bill, If I had known in advance of the real world hotness you were going to deal with this past weekend, I would have looked for escorts with an ice water effect. Not sure how that would work. At least with the Europe escorts, I think things got chill enough that the pandemic stuff was understood, but now things are getting spooky over here again, and references to it are becoming voluminous again based on my recent hunts. Did you stay sufficiently hydrated? ** David Ehrenstein, I think you would need to pay Michelle to get him to tell. ** Misanthrope, Doesn’t seem weird to me. But if it feels weird, it’s weird, right? ** Prince S, Hi, Prince S. Oh, it’s you! Hi, G. Yes, damn good writers in some cases. I’m always making notes and outright swiping things here and there from them. How are you? Enjoying the blissful lack of high heat like me? ** JoeM, I’ll see your ‘indeed’ and raise you a ‘but of course!’. ** Steve Erickson, Were they? Unusually wordy? I wonder if those QAnon weirdos are still monitoring my blog? They would have had a field day this weekend. Congrats on your museums reopening. Very happy to have ours back at work. At least for now. Especially during the recent heatwave. ** Nick Hudson, Hi, Nick. Oslo, very nice. You gonna see Kier? That ‘UBEB’ must be quite the rarity now. I think that’s the one piece of Gisele’s and mine that will never be revived. One by each? Okay, but these are totally personal fave/subjective picks. Robbe-Grillet: (that’s tough) my fave is ‘Recollection of the Golden Triangle’. Simon: My fave is ‘Triptych’, an odd but very genius one. Pinget: That’s easy, ‘Fable’. So far the only new restrictions are that we have to wear masks outdoors in certain, more populous and touristy areas of the city. But I think harder restrictions will be coming soon. Safe trip, stay well, have fun. ** Rafael, Hi, Rafael. I find them on a number of sites, but I do certain things with the profiles to alter/obscure and protect their identities, so one would probably need to have Sherlock Holmes-level skills to actually find them out there. Thanks for coming in. Take care. ** Right. Today the blog celebrates the works of the great and undervalued (by reasons of misogyny, clearly) filmmaking pioneer Mary Ellen Bute. Please figure her out and enjoy doing so. See you tomorrow.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 DC's

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑