The blog of author Dennis Cooper

Month: November 2019 (Page 6 of 13)

Carmelo Bene Day

—-

 

‘The filmmaking career of Carmelo Bene (1937 – 2002) lasted from 1968 to 1973, six years out of a lengthy time spent in the theater that made Bene one of the most celebrated figures of the Italian avant-garde in the second half of the 20th century. He first made a name for himself with a controversial production of Camus’ Caligula in Rome in 1959. Subsequent productions retained this sense of notoriety, and Bene (like Pasolini) quickly acquired a police record. Bene, however, would come to bemoan the controversy his work created, because it attracted an audience looking for shocks and titillation, while he himself was more concerned with reinventing the vocabulary of the theater: sets, gestures, texts.

‘Bene’s turn to cinema expanded that quest to reinvent. His films resist synopsis because, although they are often derived from narrative sources, Bene uses these sources against themselves and as a springboard for his critique of the stultifying traps of representation and interpretation. The films are wildly inventive and visually arresting on several levels: the performance styles of his actors, including eccentric movements, gestures and grimaces; the sets, costumes and makeup; the editing; and the use of the camera, with stable shots regularly punctuated by handheld camera work, extreme close ups and the occasional baroque use of zooms, dollies, cranes, elaborate pans and exaggerated camera angles. They resemble something like the work of Jack Smith crossed with the experimental Pasolini of Teorema and Pigsty.

‘At some point Bene worked closely with Gilles Deleuze and was interested in the complete annihilation of the “self”, intended as a conscious entity. He refused to “exist” and became a rather popular figure in Italy because he was controversial and every time he appeared on TV he aroused all kinds of outrage and scandal. In particular he was accused of speaking in riddles, of nothing and being just a clever trickster who kept fooling the audience with his nonsensical, artificially shocking performances, just to draw the attention. Most of everyone was against him, he was deliberately an antagonist, and had a very troubled and animated relationships with his critics, who were continuously trying to frame him, diminish him or celebrate him, depending on their credo.

‘One constant feature of Bene’s work is its satire of heterosexuality. The two sexes keep trying to communicate with each other, but always fail to do so. Bene’s work constantly deflates masculinist pretenses at mastery: his male characters tend to be hapless and often hysterical, while his female characters are alternately predatory and remote, and unknowable in either case. But this satire is merely the most visible form of Bene’s revolt against convention and communication. Over and over again in the films, everyday actions become hopelessly complicated or endlessly interrupted. His characters often end up staring quizzically offscreen or even into mirrors, as if they were no more sure than we are of the meaning of what they see. Indeed, identity and by extension agency seem to get suspended, along with meaning. What is left is glorious spectacle and enigmas for the eyes and ears: endless music; babbling, stuttering text; excessive and exciting images.’ — Harvard Film Archive

 

____
Stills















































 

______
Further

Carmelo Bene obituary @ the Guardian
Carmelo Bene @ IMDb
Carmelo Bene @ Anthology Film Archives
Carmelo Bene @ mubi
‘Retro: Carmelo Bene’
Carmelo Bene oriented Blog
‘Cosmic wonderful magic Carmelo Bene’
‘Carmelo Bene, genius’
‘Eccentric and Visionary, the Films of Carmelo Bene’
‘Surgically Imprecise Notes on the Great Carmelo Bene’
‘Carmelo Bene, Lectura Dantis’

 

_____
Extras


Compilation of Bene clips (in Italian)


Carmelo Bene’s home


SCM ‘Carmelo Bene Show’


Carmelo Bene as Pinocchio

 

_____
Quotes

from Looping Wor(l)d

 

If someone has defined the “phonè” as a dialectic of thought, then I deny being part of it. I’m looking for the emptiness, which is the end of every art, of every story, of every world. The language of the Great Theater, incomprehensible by definition, becomes completely comprehensible on a different level of understanding, being all about the signifier, and not the signified, or sense.

*

Language creates failures, it is only made of black holes and failures: (quoting Montale/ Nietzsche) “Only this we can now say: what we are not, what we do not want.” Who says “I say I exist, I say this” is two times a stupid. First because he believes in his self, secondly because he’s convinced of saying, and even a third time because he’s convinced of saying what he’s thinking. Because he believes that what he thinks is not signifier, but signified, a sense. That happens under his authority. It’s all noise. I think conscious intelligence is misery. I refuse to consider the ontology.

*

I do not speak, I am being spoken.

*

“The gods, plural is the noun, played yourself. The gods returned you to the mythical dawn of times. They carved you empty of simulation. Freed you of codes.”

*

“We are but ghost lights, representation and model. You and I, in the illusion of being. Sincerity in the lie, truth in contradiction. As truth does not exist, given only in the delirium of language.”

*

“Voice and language, delirium of omnipotence. Delirium because it’s not there. It does not exist.”

*

(talking of amplification through a microphone, in theater) The actorial machine is the consequence of the Great Actor, stripped of expressive corporeal human capabilities (vocal, facial expression, gestures, etc..) to wear an amplified attire, both visual and voiced. The voice of the actorial machine is not just a simple amplification, but an extension of the tonal range, becoming a whole. The autorial machine is a fusion between actor and machine; amplification is not a prosthesis, but a further organic extension where the voice is defined by the process. In the same way one doesn’t “have a body” but one “IS a body”, so one is or becomes amplification, equalization, etc…

This amplification is not a mere enlargement of the sound. As an example, it’s as if I’m reading this page at this distance. So I see and understand. But if I bring this page very close, the outlines begin to blur. Closer and closer till they vanish, and I see nothing. At this point, “everyone has his own visions”. What is infinitely large, as discovered in physics, corresponds to what is infinitely small. A step beyond the threshold. That’s why I make myself smaller, “so that he can augment, I have to wane”. It’s the conscious “self” that needs to get smaller. The emptying of the “I”, the abrogation of subject, and so of history. I refuse to be in history. I stepped out of thought.

*

Art has always been bourgeois, consolatory, idiotic, stupid, it has been especially blathering, whorish and pandering. Art has to be incommunicable. Art has only to overcome itself. That’s why it’s up to us, once we get outside ourselves, to become masterworks. Exit modality to reach the place where modality ceases to be. I can only try to explain my discomfort. I can’t engage with what’s real, what’s obvious, what’s rational. The darkness. Turning off the lights. I even hate symbolism as an artistic language. Poetry is shit. We’re still within words, trying to find a way and unable to come out. I have found in myself a desert, and I speak to the desert who’s the other, and not to someone else’s desert. I possess absence. That’s all. I am being honest b
ecause I am not myself.

*

Universe is one, one only. The pluriverse… is. One can’t say the pluriverse is “what’s left”. The universe is just a tiny, tiny sliver of pluriverse.

 

________________
6 of Carmelo Bene’s 8 films

__________________
Nostra signora dei turchi (Our Lady of the Turks) (1968)
Our Lady of the Turks is a film that is hard to categorize. Then again Carmelo Bene’s films are hard to define. Often beautiful, The film starts off as a sort of mocumentary about Ontranto, Italy. This is where the Turks tried to invade 100 years before; killing the Saracens. Then we are treated to Bene in front of the camera in a series of bizarre, surreal images and comical mishaps. Bene’s character is taunted by the Madonna. Wherever he goes this beautiful virgin Mary is sure to follow, making his life a real headache. She is symbolic of man’s desire and dreams. This is a film where visuals overpower story. It is quite a journey with it’s bizarre experimental style, but altogether it’s breathtaking.’ — IMDb


Excerpt


Excerpt


the entirety

 

_____________
Hermitage (1968)
Hermitage is a 1968 short film directed and performed by Carmelo Bene . The film is based on Credito Italiano, shot in the 804 suite of the Hermitage Hotel in Rome. Well he made it clear that it was a test for the lights and as a preparation for the next film Nostra Signora dei Turchi , but it still goes, in one way or another, considered a work in its own right. The film has as main and unique performer Carmelo Bene , except for the sporadic and fleeting appearance of Lydia Mancinelli , and has as its guiding line, sometimes broken, the sound of the voice (often off screen) and of music.’ — collaged


the entirety

 

______
Capricci (1969)
‘Bene’s second film, is, like its predecessor NOSTRA SIGNORELLA DEI TURCHI, a hallucinatory, non-linear, and ultimately apocalyptic look at life in “modern” Italy. CAPRICCI has no “story” to speak of, just a series of surreal vignettes. It begins with a dissatisfied Communist (played by Bene himself) getting into a dual with a superior; they fight with, appropriately enough, a hammer and a sickle. An old man lies in bed beside an alluring naked women; making noisy rasping sounds, he tries to have sex with her (and has about as much success as Bene did in NOSTRA SIGNORELLA DIE TURCHI, where he tried to screw wearing a suit of armor!). Bene and a lady companion make out furiously in the back of a smashed-up car. Bene’s pictorial sense is so striking he gets away with an approach that most Hollywood directors would love to fall back on (but can’t). Add to that a preference (evident in all his films) for sentimental arias and you’ve got one bizarrely impressionistic film, one that must simply be experienced rather than “understood.”’ — fright.com


Excerpt


Excerpt


the entirety

 

__________
Don Giovanni
(1970)
‘The third Bene film, Don Giovanni (1971), is taken from a story by 19th century author and dandy Jules Barbey D’Aurevilly, Le plus bel amour de Don Juan. Bene’s films are critical explorations of the texts they are based on. He operates by returning these stories to a sort of primordial dramatic and intellectual state of chaos where ideas, narratives and characters struggle to come into being. As Deleuze pointed out, Bene is concerned not with beginnings or endings, but with the middle, an engagement with a perpetual becoming, a world of constantly shifting potentiality. He achieves this by questioning and throwing off balance every aspect of his films. The frequently hysterical performances of his actors – or ‘actorial machines’ – are caricatures amplified to the level of the grotesque. Rather than playing characters, the actors become stylised embodiments of some of their defining characteristics, shrieking, slobbering, whispering and drooling their way through a series of events that resemble variations on certain themes or gestures rather than a developing narrative.’ — Senses of Cinema


Excerpt


Excerpt


the entirety

 

_____
Salomè
(1972)
‘The opening scenes of Bene’s claustrophobic and dreamlike 1972 Italian adaptation warn the viewer that this is going to be a strange ride. Immediately after the film starts a number of strange images appear including an animated camel passing through a needle and a bejewelled and glittering woman swimming in pitch black water. The whole film is a contrast of colours with the majority of the actors – those who are wearing clothes anyway – entirely clad in spiky neon robes and jewels and all of what constitutes the action (except the final scene) taking place on what appears to be an island floating in some kind of black lake illuminated by a mysterious light source that refuses to stay in one place. These violent colours assault the eyes as super-fast cuts jump the camera from one person to another and the disorientation is increased by the rapid overlapping conversations in stage whispers that accompany this movement.’ — Suite 101


Excerpt


Excerpt


Excerpt

 

______________
Un Amleto di meno
(One Hamlet Less) (1973)
‘Bene described his films as “music for the eyes” put together with a “surgical indiscipline of montage”. He constantly strives for a glorious visual excessiveness, with unusual camera angles, shifts between black and white and colour, interesting superimpositions and either overtly theatrical – as in One Hamlet Less – or otherwise expressionistically employed settings. This anti-naturalistic approach is further heightened by the asynchronous use of sound, which incorporates heavily amplified sounds such as breathing and coughing, shouted or stammered dialogue and sudden bursts of mainly classical music, most commonly opera. If Bene’s cinema is one of constant becoming, of repetition and incompletion, perhaps the most common recurring theme in his scenes is frustration. Yet the films that comprise his self described “cinematic parenthesis” are seldom screened or written about, especially in the English-speaking world. For a director whose work matches the visual power and representational complexity of Kenneth Anger or Derek Jarman’s best work, this a particularly unfortunate oversight.’ — Senses of Cinema


Excerpt


Excerpt


the entirety
—-

 

*

p.s. Hey. If anyone’s interested, Jeff Jackson has written a terrific thing about Permanent Green Light and a bit about Zac’s and my next film as well as my new novel that’s just up on Lit Hub. Here. ** David Ehrenstein, Hi. I’ve often thought that ‘Between the Buttons’ might be my favorite Rolling Stones album. There were definitely interesting porn films made in the theatrical days, and auteur directors experimenting a lot with the form, which you don’t really see anymore or only in a limited, slight shifting of the norms kind of way. Re: the publisher, I’ve got everything that’s remotely crossable crossed for you from this point until they hopefully send you the contract. Everyone, There’s a new FaBlog thing for you to peruse. ** Bill, Hi, Bill. London was fun. The event was curious, but it seemed to go well, and it was packed, which is good, I guess. Otherwise I just saw a few friends and a little bit of art: Mark Leckey, Steve McQueen, Bridget Riley, and an interesting survey show of Fluxus sound art. The TV meeting was not fun to say the least, but I’ll leave it at that. Otherwise I’ll rant. I saw Morton Subotnik here in Paris a while back, and it was amazing, as I think I’ve already mentioned. Oh, wow, that gig you’re readying for seems fantastic. I assume you’ll be rehearsing with the others, or … ? Is it all going to be left up to chance? ** Sypha, Well, you’re hardly the only person wishing for more fire in the recent Nick Cave stuff, if that’s consolation. ** Nik, Hey! Well, I’ve always really enjoyed the editing part of writing a novel, and going back into the new one involved mostly editing and refining and reorganising what I had written a few years before, so it was the part I love without the part I love a lot less, i.e. the writing of the first draft. Excellent that the Conjunctions gig has led to help with your own work. Huge luck re: wherever you sent your story to. Yeah, let me know what happens. You have a good one too, man. ** Afad, Hi, welcome. You never know how real the escorts’ stories and comments are. All I can say is that, having spent a long time looking at/studying those ads, there seemed to be unusual level of authenticity in his own writings at least, and his sort of tacit-seeming acknowledgement of the history the commenters laid out was interesting and might mean something. But, really, it’s impossible to know for sure. ** Misanthrope, Hi, G. London seemed to go well, and it was a fun quickie in general. Gosh, I hope Rigby is doing well. Surgery: shit. Ouchie on your bicep. Shit, man. It’s hopefully more peaceful now? Best of the best with the novel forward motion and everything else. ** Thomas, Hi. Welcome, and thank you a lot! How are you doing? What’s up? ** _Black_Acrylic, Hi, Ben. Yep. ** Steve Erickson, Hi. Hm, the Ka5sh doesn’t sound all that promising. Everyone, Mr. Erickson has interviewed director Annabelle Attanasio here, and reviewed Mati Diop’s ATLANTICS here. Lou Christie’s albums are all uneven, but, of the original releases, you would definitely want to get ‘Lightnin’ Strikes’, then, depending on how into him you are, probably a ‘greatest hits’ comp as a follow up. That early period of Glen Campbell is surprisingly very fine. He’s pretty overlooked. ** Grant Maierhofer, Hi, Grant! Man, thank you so much for that piece you wrote referencing my Cycle. I was blown away and am super appreciative. Yeah, my new novel is finished. I don’t yet know who will publish it or when. I’m in the unpleasant anxiously hoping and waiting-to-find-out phase. ** Right. Do any of you know the films of Carmelo Bene. Pretty unique and interesting work. I hope you’ve delve into what I loaded up there. See you tomorrow.

Forgotten but not gone: Bizarro pop song auteur Lou Christie, a refresher *

* (restored)
—-

 

‘While Lou Christie’s shrieking falsetto was among the most distinctive voices in all of pop music, he was also one of the first solo performers of the rock era to compose his own material, generating some of the biggest and most memorable hits of the mid-1960s. In the early 60s, he made the acquaintance of producer and arranger Jack Nitzsche, who helped sculpt the odd, distinctive sonics of Christie’s songs, and Twyla Herbert, a classically trained musician and self-proclaimed mystic some 20 years his senior; they became songwriting partners. In 1966, he scored his biggest hit — the lush, chart-topping “Lightnin’ Strikes.” Christie’s next hit, 1966’s “Rhapsody in the Rain,” was notorious for being among the more sexually explicit efforts of the period. After brief stays with Colpix and Columbia, he next moved to the Buddah label, scoring one last Top Ten hit in 1969 with “I’m Gonna Make You Mine.” Drug problems plagued Christie during the early ’70s, and after getting clean at a London rehab clinic, he dropped out of music, working variously as a ranch hand, offshore oil driller, and carnival barker.’ — allmusic

‘Lou has shared the stage with many of the greats of Rock ‘n’ Roll including The Rolling Stones, The Who, Neil Diamond, Roy Orbison, Jerry Lee Lewis, and Little Richard. Elton John, John Lennon, Madonna are among the music legends upon whom Lou has had an effect. Elton John played piano for LOU during LOU’S ‘London Period’ in the early 70’s and recorded LOU’S song, SHE SOLD ME MAGIC. John Lennon repeatedly pointed out in his interviews that “LOU CHRISTIE was one of my influences”. And, Madonna thanked LOU in the liner notes of her ten million selling Immaculate Collection LP. Over the past decade, Lou has led the resurgence of Rock ‘n’ Roll heroes performing through out the world. LOU’S fans recognize his distinctive vocal and writing performances in major motion pictures. Many distinguished directors are also fans. Films that feature Lou’s songs include Barry Levinson’s -RAINMAN, Whit Stillman’s – BARCELONA and THE LAST DAYS OF DISCO, Tony Bill’s – A HOME OF OUR OWN, Richard Linklatter’s – BEFORE SUNRISE, John Hughes – DUTCH, Michael de Avila’s – BURNZY’S LAST CALL, and Oliver Stone’s TV mini series – WILD PALMS.’ — TLCB

‘One singer/songwriter who is due a major scale rediscovery by hard core serious pop fans is Lou Christie. He made records that combined the polar opposites of bubblegum pop and a Scott Walker-esque grandeur. I can’t think of anyone else in 1965 (not even Brian Wilson or the Beatles) who made singles and album cuts that were so ahead of the game, were so inventive and packed so much into just 3 minutes as Christie did with a series jaw droppingly brilliant singles. This is a weird and wonderful, complex artist with a soaring multi-octave vocal talent.’ — Morrissey

 

___
Further

Lou Christie Official Website
Lou Christie: Lightning is Still Striking
Lou Christie International Fan Club Home Page
Lou Christie Discography
Lou Christie Interview

 

_______
Interview

 

Q – Lou, you were asked about the Rock artists of today and you said “They are so much more aware. I mean there are so many turkeys out there who are not so dumb. No one is as innocent as we were in the old days.” Are you saying that today’s rockers are more savvy when it comes to business than you were?

A – Savvy? A four year old is more savvy than we were. We came from an innocent era; a period where it really was Mom and Pop and the Catholic Church for me. Being Italian, that ethnicity was such a big part of my family, of my upbringing. Of course, I was also raised on a farm. I was raised out in the country. My Dad had about 109 acres. It was mostly crab apples and trees. But, we had the garden. Sometimes we grew soybeans and we had a big vegetable garden and corn. We had chicken and goats and pigs and pigeons and ducks. When I say we had chickens, we had 200 chickens. I was raised in an entirely different way than the kids of today are. The sophistication level was pretty much nil. (laughs)

Q – One good thing about being in the country, at least the neighbors wouldn’t call the police if your band was rehearsing.

A – I didn’t have a band. I never sang with a band until I cut the first record. That was the first time I sang with a band, when we cut “The Gypsy Cried”. I always had singing groups. I was always dragging my sister into my life to sing with me or be in one of my great productions, whatever it was. (laughs) I usually had two boys and two girls in the group, the vocal group. It was an all a cappella type thing.

Q – You actually threw away a Classical music scholarship to pursue Rock ‘n’ Roll, didn’t you?

A – Absolutely. (laughs)

Q – Where was the scholarship to?

A – Well, there were a few of them that had come by the wayside. When I was in high school I was like student conductor of the choir, because I sang almost every solo there was to sing every time there was a Christmas holiday or Easter or whatever it was. I won a couple of scholarships just to take vocal things. I wasn’t even driving then. I must’ve been about 13 or 14. The whole idea was; my mentor, Frank Cummings wanted me to obviously continue and pursue the more Classical, semi-Classical end and sing that way. My octave range is like four octaves. So, I was the lowest bass we had. I have this other voice that I really couldn’t use that much. That’s where he was pushing me, in that direction. I just kept passing on it. I wanted to get in on Rock ‘n’ Roll ’cause Bandstand was happening at the time. I had to get on American Bandstand. I wasn’t going to do it singing some Classical song. The only way I could do it was to cut a record and I did. I kept pursuing that end of it.

Q – What kind of recording equipment did you have in your basement in 1960, that allowed you to record “The Gypsy Cried”?

A – Oh, it wasn’t even in the basement. I didn’t have any recording equipment. I cut the thing on a little two track machine. That was up in someone’s place in Pittsburgh. Then we went to a four track machine…”Two Faces Have I”. That first album was on a four track. There weren’t things like punching-in and all those little terms they use today. Everyone sang and played together.

Q – It was one take or start again.

A – Yeah. That was it.

Q – How did you land a deal with Roulette Records?

A – Well, “The Gypsy Cried” was released on a small local label in Pittsburgh. They were distributing other records and one of the labels they distributed was Roulette Records. The man who owned that was Morris Levy. He had the End label, the Gone label. He had Frankie Lymon and The Teenagers, The Flamingos, The Chantels, Jimmie Rodgers and Tito Puente. This distributing company that distributed records throughout the tri-state area in Pittsburgh had a gentleman, Nick Session, who loved falsetto voices. I talked him into helping me cut this record. We cut “The Gypsy Cried” on a little label called Co and C, and it started being a hit in Pittsburgh. I was doing record hops and doing the Clark Gray Show, driving my Dad’s car out every weekend or having someone drive me to do record hops with some of the local disc jockeys. The record started taking off. It started spreading from Pittsburgh to Ohio to Cleveland to Johnstown, Pennsylvania. Then, it jumped out of San Francisco and started spreading around the country and that was it. Roulette Records picked it up and said I think we got a hit here. And that was the beginning of how I got on Roulette.

Q – How long did it take you to write “The Gypsy Cried”?

A – About 15 minutes. It was one of those things that just happened. It was so easy. Then, when it was a hit, we thought oh my God, now what do we follow up with? And we wrote “Two Faces Have I”. As you go on, you learn more and in one way you become more secure and insecure at the same time. It was like a double-edged sword. You had to write something better than the last record and then you started learning how to write songs. You kept learning as you went along. It was all self-taught. It was instinct. I went truly by my instincts and that’s always the best…for me anyhow. I guide my life by my instincts. If there’s a lesson to learn I guess it’s follow your instinct and then learn the lesson.

Q – You did the Dick Clark Cavalcade of Stars tour. From what I gather, you weren’t too fond of the touring. In fact, you were going to write a book called The Stench Of Dick’s Bus. Did you ever write that book?

A – No. I loved those tours. I had a great time on them. Are you kidding? I was sitting on the bus with Diana Ross. She was sitting on the seat next to me. She and I were bus buddies. I always put it that way. It’s best that way. Here I was, sitting next to all those people who, six months ago I bought their records and watched them on American Bandstand. Now, all of a sudden I’m one of them. There would be Brian Hyland. We roomed together. Brian and I shared our hotel rooms together. Then I was with Gene Pitney and Johnny Tillotson, The Supremes, Paul and Paula, Dick and Dee Dee, The Crystals, The Ronettes, Fabian, Frankie Avalon. To me, this was my graduating class and still is today.

Q – How long did you do those tours?

A – I did them for years. Some of them we would do for 32 one nighters in a row and see a hotel room every other night. We’d sleep on the bus every other night. So, that was grueling. It was hard, but we were young. I had nothing to compare it to. They didn’t have VCRs and televisions, even bathrooms on the bus the way they have today. We sat up the whole tour on the bus…the band, Dick Clark and all the acts.

Q – You believe that at the time of the British Invasion, the Teen Idols were going down the tubes. Tell me why you believe that.

A – Oh, they went. They started disappearing. It was so interesting that I kept going. I hit the end of that whole era. I’ve always been between the cracks of Rock ‘n’ Roll, I felt. The missing link. Someone wrote about me being the missing link of all this Rock ‘n’ Roll. We had the Teenage Idols. We had Frankie Avalon. We had Fabian. That thing was just about closing down when a lot of my records started hitting. I guess one of the last of that era between the late ’50s, early ’60s. Then, they all disappeared, but my records kept going through that English Invasion. I had the biggest record of all time with “Lightning Strikes” in the middle of the English Invasion. I remember we were on tour and Paul and Paula had just come back from England and they said there’s a group over there called The Beatles. That was 1963. They hadn’t even landed in the States. They started telling me all about this group.

Q – What did you think when they started describing The Beatles and the reaction their music was getting?

A – I didn’t think much of it. It was interesting, but we were always hearing about the new group or the new song.

Q – Did they tell you about the hair?

A – Yeah. They said they had long, shaggy hair.

Q – Did you know what they were talking about?

A – No, not really. They were using the terms Mod and Mop Tops. I thought what the hell are they talking about? Here we are traveling through the South. I was considered having long hair, but it was nothing compared to what the Beatles were. Of course, we wore these pompadours. That was our claim to fame.

Q – Did you hear their music at the time?

A – I remember hearing one of the songs…”She Loves You” or something like that and I thought it’s kind of different. And then all of a sudden it was, Oh my God, this English Invasion has started. That was pretty much the end of the people I was traveling around the country with. We were in teen magazines together. We were sort of the cat’s meow there for all those years as being teenage idols, teenage princes and princesses.

Q – You played with David Bowie. Do you recall where that was?

A – I don’t know if it was Albert Hall or the London Palladium. It was before he went into his Ziggy Stardust. It was fascinating to go over to Europe and be a success there.

Q – Were you ripped off by your record company and business team?

A – Of course. Isn’t that the old story of everyone? You know, I can tell my story of what happened. By the time I was 21, I had made a million dollars and had lost a million dollars.

Q – But, if you never had it, how then could you lose it?

A – That’s right. The same thing happened a couple of times in my life. When I was a little older, it happened again. I was 27. Only that time I had two children and a wife, so starting over at that time wasn’t easy. The ups and downs in this career have been just unbelievable and maybe someday I’ll write about it when I feel I’ve lived enough. My life has been very interesting…very interesting.

 

__
Gig


‘Cryin’ in the Streets’


‘Rhapsody in the Rain’


‘Jungle’


‘Trapeze’


‘I’m Gonna Make You Mine’


‘She Sold Me Magic’


‘If My Car Could Only Talk to Me’


‘Have I Sinned’


‘Two Faces Have I’


‘Big Time’


‘Cryin’ on My Knees’


‘Tears on My Pillow’


‘Self Expression (The Kids on the Street Will Never Give In)’


‘Shake Hands and Walk Away Crying’


‘Lightnin’ Strikes’
—-

 

*

p.s. Hey. I’m at a meeting this morning and can’t do the p.s., but I will tomorrow. Until then please explore this restored foray into the curious musical oeuvre of 60s hit maker turned latter day cult figure Lou Christie.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 DC's

Theme by Anders NorénUp ↑